Abstract
Objective
To examine whether the risk of having clinically significant depressive symptoms following a heart attack or stroke varies by the presence of a close social contact.
Methods
The National Health and Aging Trends Study is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older initiated in 2011. 5,643 older adults had information on social contacts at baseline and depressive symptoms at the one-year follow-up interview. The PHQ-2 identified clinically significant depressive symptoms. Interview questions examined social contacts and the presence of self-reported heart attack or stroke during the year of follow-up.
Results
297 older adults reported experiencing a heart attack and/or stroke between their baseline and follow-up interviews. In regression analyses accounting for sociodemographics, baseline depressive symptoms, medical comorbidity, and ADL impairment, older adults with no close social contacts had increased odds of depressive symptoms at follow-up after experiencing a heart attack or stroke, while those with close social contacts had increased odds of depressive symptoms at follow-up after experiencing a stroke, but not a heart attack.
Conclusions
Older adults have increased odds of having depressive symptoms following a self-reported stroke, but only those with no close social contacts had increased odds of depressive symptoms following a heart attack. Social networks may play a role in the mechanisms underlying depression among older adults experiencing certain acute health events. Future work exploring the potential causal relationships suggested here, if confirmed, could inform interventions to alleviate or prevent depression among at risk older adults.
Keywords: Epidemiology, medical comorbidity, longitudinal, social support
Introduction
In the United States, every year approximately 1.5 million people experience a heart attack (consisting of new or recurrent coronary attacks and silent myocardial infarctions) and 800,000 have a new or recurrent stroke (Lloyd-Jones et al., 2010). Depression is also highly prevalent with 1 in 5 adults in the United States having at least mild depression symptoms (Shim et al., 2011). By 2030, unipolar depressive disorders are projected to become the second leading source of disease burden as measured by disability-adjusted life years (Mathers and Loncar, 2006).
The interrelationship that heart attacks and strokes have with depression is complex, with depression increasing the risk for heart disease (Skala et al., 2006) and strokes (Pan et al., 2011), and heart disease and strokes being associated with elevated levels of depression (Ayerbe et al., 2013; Jiang and Davidson, 2005; Ziegelstein, 2001). For example, a meta-analysis found that following a stroke there is a 39–52% five-year cumulative incidence of depression (as assessed by diagnostic criteria, symptom severity scales, or a validated question) (Ayerbe et al., 2013). There are potentially significant consequences of depression in patients with heart attacks or strokes. Following an acute coronary syndrome, there is a “preponderance of evidence” (p. 1,357) that depression is a risk factor for adverse medical outcomes such as all-cause mortality (Lichtman et al., 2014), and post-stroke depression is likewise associated with increased mortality as well as disability and worse recovery of function (Ayerbe et al., 2013; Robinson, 2003).
Social support (which can include social integration, social networks, and relational content) (Luttik et al., 2005) also may meaningfully impact physical and mental health, with social isolation and loneliness having a comparable risk for premature mortality as physical activity and obesity (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015). Small social networks and/or isolation can increase the risk of depression, heart disease, and strokes as well as potentially decrease adherence to care and engagement in healthy behaviors (Vink et al., 2008; Nagayoshi et al., 2014; Hemingway and Marmot, 1999; Boden-Albala et al., 2005). Furthermore, social support can affect the morbidity associated with physical illnesses: Higher levels of perceived social support have been linked to faster and more complete post-stroke recovery (Glass et al., 1993), while social isolation has been associated with adverse post-stroke outcomes (Boden-Albala et al., 2005). Social support also may increase resilience to stress (Ozbay et al., 2007) and could thereby buffer against the effects of an acute medical illness.
Despite all of the above, we have a relatively limited understanding of why depression may follow a heart attack or stroke. Although social support may have clinical management and prognostic implications for those experiencing a heart attack or stroke, social support measures such as social isolation are absent from many large stroke databases (Aron et al., 2015). While there is more information linking poor social support to depression post-heart attack, these studies often are relatively small, are geographically limited, and/or do not prospectively evaluate social support prior to the heart attack (Frasure-Smith et al., 2000; Dickens et al., 2004). We are unaware of prior studies that used a nationally representative sample that assessed social support and depressive symptoms at baseline and prospectively measured the occurrence of heart attacks, strokes, and depressive symptoms.
Utilizing a cohort study design, we use longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) in the United States (U.S.) to address this gap in our understanding of depressive symptoms following a heart attack or stroke. We hypothesize that older adults with no close social contacts will be at risk for clinically significant depressive symptoms following a self-reported heart attack or stroke. Given that depression following a heart attack and stroke is associated with serious adverse health outcomes, an improved understanding of how physical health, mental health, and the presence of close social contacts intersect could help inform interventions to identify those at risk of having depression and also intervene on the pathways that lead to adverse outcomes after an acute medical event.
Methods
Sample
Since 2011, NHATS has been examining a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the U.S., with participants being interviewed yearly (Kasper and Freedman, 2015). NHATS has an unweighted response rate of 70.9% in the baseline 2011 interview and a unweighted response rate of 86.1% in the second interview one year later (conditional on participating in the baseline interview) (Kasper and Freedman, 2015). The NHATS interview was administered in English and Spanish, and older age groups and Black individuals were oversampled (Kasper and Freedman, 2015). NHATS was approved by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Our cohort study consists of NHATS participants with non-missing responses to the presence of close social contacts at baseline who survived to provide information on depressive symptoms at follow-up (N=5,643).
Depression
Depressive symptoms were assessed with the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), a validated depression screening instrument that measures depressed mood and anhedonia in the prior two weeks (Kroenke et al., 2003). It is scored from 0 to 6 with scores of 3 or higher indicating the presence of clinically significant depressive symptoms. Sensitivity and specificity for major depressive disorder are 83% and 90% respectively (Kroenke et al., 2003). NHATS slightly modified the PHQ-2 to examine a four week period (Kasper and Freedman, 2015).
Close Social Contacts
The presence of close social contacts at baseline was assessed with this question: “Looking back over the last year, who are the people you talked with most often about important things?” The total number of contacts was derived from this question and ranged from 0 to 5, and participants are allowed to report a maximum of 5 close social contacts (Kasper and Freedman, 2015). We stratified participants into groups defined by those without (0) and those with (1–5) close social contacts because our primary focus is to examine the association between acute medical illnesses and depression in older adults who may be socially isolated.
Cardiovascular Events
NHATS evaluates the presence of a new onset heart attack or stroke at follow-up (Kasper and Freedman, 2015), which was determined by these questions: “We are interested in new health conditions that you have learned about this year. Since the time of the last interview in [last interview month and year], has a doctor told you that you had: 1) a heart attack or myocardial infarction? or 2) a stroke?”
Covariates
We examined covariates previously associated with late-life depression (Vink et al., 2008) and included baseline depressive symptoms, age, gender, marital status, race and ethnicity, education, medical conditions (which include hypertension, arthritis, heart disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, lung disease, dementia, and cancer), and ADL impairments in our analyses.
Statistical Analyses
Bivariate and multivariable analyses characterized the risk of having clinically significant depressive symptoms following a self-reported heart attack or stroke stratified by the presence of close social contacts. We used the Rao-Scott F adjusted chi-square statistic (National Center for Health Statistics, 2013) to examine depressive symptoms and sample characteristic differences stratified by the presence/absence of close social contacts. We conducted a series of unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses, both of which had depressive symptoms at follow-up as the outcome variable. The primary independent variables were: 1) heart attack, 2) stroke, and 3) heart attack and/or stroke. Baseline depressive symptoms, age, gender, marital status, race and ethnicity, education, medical conditions, and ADL impairment were included in the adjusted models, but not the unadjusted models; we also adjusted for history of heart attack and/or stroke when the primary independent variables were heart attack and/or stroke, respectively. Covariates were included as dummy variables and reference groups were no baseline depression, male gender, married or living with a partner, white non-Hispanic, college degree, no ADL impairment, and no history of heart attack or stroke; age and medical conditions were treated as ordinal variables in the regression analyses. Due to the complex survey design of NHATS, we employed SAS survey procedures (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) to calculate population-weighted adjusted estimates that account for sampling design and nonresponse. Per NHATS technical guidance (Kasper and Freedman, 2015), we applied the Round 1 analytic weights for our analyses. We accounted for the variability of participants with missing data (many of whom were deceased) by applying the “not missing completely at random” (i.e., nomcar) option available in SAS’s survey procedures.
Results
Cohort
Of the 7,026 older adults participating in the initial interview (there were an additional 583 proxy informant and 468 nursing home interviews that did not assess the presence of close social contacts), 250 were deceased at follow-up and 5,691 completed the one-year follow-up interview. Of these, 5,643 had information on close social contacts and depressive symptoms. At the follow-up interview, a total of 297 participants reported experiencing a heart attack and/or a stroke in the intervening year; 146 endorsed having a heart attack, 128 reported having a stroke, and 23 reported both.
Characteristics by Presence of Close Social Contacts
In the NHATS cohort of older adults, a self-reported heart attack or stroke was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms in both those with and without close social contacts. In those with close social contacts, increasing age, not being married, and a history of a heart attack and stroke were associated with depressive symptoms. Across all participants, irrespective of presence of close social contacts, minority racial/ethnicity status, not finishing high school, baseline depressive symptoms, medical conditions, and ADL impairment, on average, were associated with the presence of depressive symptoms (Table 1).
Table 1.
Sample Characteristics | 0 Close Contacts
|
p valuea | 1–5 Close Contacts
|
p valuea | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHQ-2 Positive N=69 | PHQ-2 Negative N=316 | PHQ-2 Positive N=686
|
PHQ-2 Negative N=4,572 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
N | % | SE | N | % | SE | N | % | SE | N | % | SE | |||
Age at Baseline, Years | 0.171 | 0.006 | ||||||||||||
65–69 | 13 | 17.1 | 5.2 | 58 | 25.5 | 2.8 | 120 | 25.7 | 1.7 | 932 | 30.3 | 0.6 | ||
70–74 | 12 | 23.1 | 6.8 | 70 | 26.1 | 3.5 | 134 | 23.5 | 1.7 | 1,011 | 25.9 | 0.6 | ||
75–79 | 13 | 23.2 | 6.1 | 68 | 21.0 | 2.3 | 144 | 19.7 | 1.5 | 933 | 18.9 | 0.6 | ||
80–84 | 10 | 13.5 | 4.4 | 67 | 16.0 | 2.4 | 147 | 17.0 | 1.5 | 885 | 13.8 | 0.5 | ||
85+ | 21 | 23.1 | 4.1 | 53 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 141 | 14.1 | 1.2 | 811 | 11.0 | 0.5 | ||
Gender, Female | 33 | 50.9 | 6.5 | 155 | 45.9 | 3.3 | 0.506 | 426 | 59.2 | 2.4 | 2,662 | 56.5 | 0.9 | 0.299 |
Marital Status b | 0.369 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||
Married or Living with Partner | 19 | 34.1 | 6.8 | 112 | 38.6 | 3.0 | 307 | 50.3 | 2.3 | 2,451 | 60.5 | 0.8 | ||
Separated or Divorced | 18 | 23.7 | 5.3 | 55 | 19.0 | 3.1 | 108 | 17.4 | 1.5 | 510 | 11.2 | 0.4 | ||
Widowed | 28 | 37.8 | 6.3 | 114 | 30.8 | 2.9 | 241 | 28.4 | 1.7 | 1,469 | 25.4 | 0.7 | ||
Never Married | 4 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 31 | 11.5 | 2.8 | 30 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 140 | 2.9 | 0.3 | ||
Race and Ethnicity c | 0.011 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||
White, non-Hispanic | 30 | 61.2 | 6.5 | 194 | 78.3 | 2.1 | 425 | 75.6 | 2.3 | 3,309 | 84.4 | 0.8 | ||
Black, non-Hispanic | 27 | 21.3 | 4.2 | 95 | 12.8 | 1.2 | 179 | 10.8 | 1.1 | 895 | 7.1 | 0.4 | ||
Other | 11 | 17.6 | 5.9 | 22 | 8.9 | 1.6 | 78 | 13.6 | 2.2 | 334 | 8.5 | 0.6 | ||
Education d | 0.039 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||
Did Not Finish High School | 32 | 42.5 | 6.9 | 89 | 24.3 | 2.4 | 247 | 30.5 | 2.3 | 1,013 | 17.3 | 0.9 | ||
High School Degree or Equivalent | 20 | 27.8 | 6.0 | 81 | 27.4 | 2.9 | 187 | 28.5 | 2.4 | 1,239 | 26.8 | 0.9 | ||
Some College or Vocational Training | 4 | 9.2 | 4.5 | 63 | 19.3 | 2.5 | 113 | 19.5 | 2.1 | 966 | 22.6 | 0.8 | ||
College Degree | 13 | 20.4 | 7.0 | 78 | 29.0 | 2.2 | 134 | 21.5 | 1.8 | 1,323 | 33.3 | 1.4 | ||
Depression Screen Positive at Baseline, Yes e | 22 | 32.2 | 6.5 | 45 | 11.7 | 1.8 | <0.001 | 248 | 37.2 | 2.8 | 467 | 9.4 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Heart Attack at Baseline, Yes f | 11 | 15.3 | 4.7 | 34 | 8.2 | 2.0 | 0.082 | 144 | 20.0 | 1.7 | 650 | 13.1 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Heart Attack at Follow-Up, Yes g | 5 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 6 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.012 | 31 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 127 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.017 |
Stroke at Baseline, Yes h | 11 | 16.2 | 4.3 | 36 | 9.7 | 2.0 | 0.085 | 123 | 16.7 | 1.4 | 421 | 7.8 | 0.5 | <0.001 |
Stroke at Follow-Up, Yes i | 7 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.006 | 40 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 98 | 1.8 | 0.2 | <0.001 |
Heart Attack and/or Stroke at Baseline, Yes j | 17 | 23.9 | 5.8 | 62 | 16.5 | 2.4 | 0.127 | 223 | 30.4 | 1.9 | 944 | 18.7 | 0.6 | <0.001 |
Heart Attack and/or Stroke at Follow-Up, Yes k | 12 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 11 | 3.1 | 1.0 | <0.001 | 64 | 9.2 | 1.1 | 210 | 4.1 | 0.3 | <0.001 |
Medical Conditions at Baseline l | 0.008 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||
0–25 Percentile | 17 | 23.1 | 6.1 | 116 | 44.3 | 3.1 | 145 | 22.1 | 2.0 | 1,396 | 33.2 | 0.7 | ||
25–50 Percentile | 16 | 29.5 | 6.3 | 84 | 24.1 | 2.6 | 158 | 23.9 | 1.8 | 1,315 | 28.7 | 0.8 | ||
50–75 Percentile | 18 | 23.6 | 5.0 | 67 | 19.7 | 2.0 | 169 | 23.4 | 1.9 | 1,061 | 22.0 | 0.6 | ||
75–100 Percentile | 17 | 23.8 | 5.6 | 47 | 11.9 | 1.7 | 206 | 30.6 | 1.9 | 767 | 16.1 | 0.6 | ||
ADL Impairments at Baseline, Yes m | 30 | 47.8 | 7.0 | 79 | 21.4 | 2.6 | <0.001 | 325 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 1,208 | 24.4 | 0.7 | <0.001 |
Notes: SE: standard error
p values determined by Rao-Scott F adjusted chi-square statistic.
There are missing data with the number of participants per social network grouping (without close and with close contacts, respectively) equaling:
381, 5256;
379, 5220;
380, 5222;
381, 5230;
385, 5254;
385, 5256;
385, 5252;
385, 5253;
385, 5250;
385, 5251;
382, 5217;
368, 5025.
Regression Analyses
In the logistic regression analyses that did not adjust for baseline depressive symptoms or the sociodemographic covariates, older adults with and without close social contacts had increased odds of having depressive symptoms after experiencing a heart attack and/or stroke. The odds ratio estimates for depressive symptoms at follow-up in those with a heart attack and/or stroke were 2.41 (95% CI: 1.76–3.28) and 4.87 (95% CI: 1.87–12.71) for those with and without close social contacts, respectively (Table 2). In the logistic regression analyses that included baseline depressive symptoms, age, gender, marital status, race and ethnicity, education, medical conditions, ADL impairment, and history of heart attack and/or stroke, older adults with and without close social contacts had increased odds for depressive symptoms at follow-up in those with a stroke (with social contacts, OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.76–3.59; without social contacts, OR: 4.44, 95% CI: 1.03–19.14). In the adjusted analyses, however, only those without close social contacts had increased odds for depressive symptoms following a reported heart attack (with social contacts, OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.68–2.07; without social contacts, OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.68–18.44) (Table 2).
Table 2.
0 Close Contacts | 1–5 Close Contacts | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
N | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval a | N | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval a | |
Unadjusted Analyses | 385 | 5,256 | ||||
Heart Attack at Follow-Up, Yes | 3.89 | 1.25–12.12 | 1.73 | 1.10–2.73 | ||
Stroke at Follow-Up, Yes | 4.90 | 1.41–17.09 | 3.41f | 2.38–4.89 | ||
Heart Attack and/or Stroke at Follow-Up, Yes | 4.87 | 1.87–12.71 | 2.41g | 1.76–3.28 | ||
Adjusted Analyses b | 353 | 4,925 | ||||
Heart Attack at Follow-Up, Yes c | 5.57 | 1.68–18.44 | 1.19 | 0.68–2.07 | ||
Stroke at Follow-Up, Yes d | 4.44 | 1.03–19.14 | 2.51h | 1.76–3.59 | ||
Heart Attack and/or Stroke at Follow-Up, Yes e | 5.28 | 1.60–17.41 | 1.65i | 1.13–2.40 |
Intervals based on 95% Wald confidence limits.
Analyses adjusted for baseline depression, age, gender, marital status, race and ethnicity, educational status, medical conditions, and ADL impairment. Also adjusted for history of:
heart attacks,
strokes, or
heart attacks and strokes.
There are missing data with the number of participants equaling:
5253;
5251;
4922;
4917.
We also conducted a sensitivity logistic regression analysis that controlled for baseline depressive symptoms, age, gender, marital status, race and ethnicity, education, medical comorbidity, ADL impairment, and history of a heart attack or stroke and included an interaction term between the presence of close social contacts with the occurrence of a heart attack and/or stroke with the outcome being clinically significant depressive symptoms at follow-up. The interaction term was statistically significant (N=5,270, F-value=4.2, p=0.047).
Discussion
Our hypothesis that older adults with no close social contacts at baseline will be at risk for clinically significant depressive symptoms following a self-reported heart attack or stroke was supported by our bivariate and multivariable analyses, though there was evidence of an association between depressive symptoms and stroke among older adults with close social contacts as well. Because smaller social network sizes and/or social support have been associated with an increased risk for depressive symptoms and disorders (Vink et al., 2008), coronary heart disease (Hemingway and Marmot, 1999), and strokes (Nagayoshi et al., 2014), our multivariable analyses included baseline depressive symptom status as well as a self-reported history of heart attacks and strokes.
These findings, though not causal, are consistent with prior work (Dickens et al., 2004; Frasure-Smith et al., 2000) and provide further evidence suggesting that older adults with no close social contacts may be vulnerable towards having depression following an acute medical illness. Though not examined here, the effects of having a close social contact may occur through the complicated construct of social support which is downstream of social networks/contacts (Berkman et al., 2000), and there are numerous potential pathways through which the associations that we identified here could operate. For example, social support could contribute to maintaining physical and mental health, may provide protection against the full effects of mental and physical illness, and may confer resilience to stress (Ozbay et al., 2007). As social support can have a significant impact on life expectancy and other health outcomes (Ozbay et al., 2007; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015), it is encouraging that social impairment is potentially modifiable and interventions to improve social support are increasingly well-studied (Dickens et al., 2011). Such interventions have included home visits, educational programs, group support, and intergenerational social activities (Dickens et al., 2011). While we observe that social connections may have possible protective cardiovascular implications, more explicit characterization on how the presence of close social contacts affects health is required to inform the design of possible interventions.
With regards to interventions targeting the intersection of acute medical illness, social support, and depression, we identified one study that randomized 2,481 heart attack patients to care as usual or a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention (Berkman et al., 2003). In this study, depression and perceived social support were secondary outcomes and, even though mortality and recurrent heart attacks did not improve in the CBT arm, the CBT-based intervention did improve depression and perceived social support (Berkman et al., 2003). This large randomized clinical trial provides evidence that social support is potentially dynamic and modifiable in a medically vulnerable population and could meaningfully inform future interventions.
Our study has several limitations. Our social support variable was based on a single self-reported question. Thus, while social support can be highly multifaceted and include the domains of social integration, social networks, and relational content (Luttik et al., 2005), our study examined the presence of close social contacts. We thereby did not examine whether different social support domains have differential effects on depressive symptoms at follow-up. Another limitation is that the absolute numbers of those experiencing a heart attack or stroke in a year are relatively small when stratified by the presence of close social contacts, which increases the variability of our point estimates and limits our ability to examine the roles of additional covariates in our multivariable analyses. The variability in our point estimates also limited our ability to compare the different number of social contacts point estimates to one another. While we could have pooled our social contact data and conducted analyses that tested for effect modification across the entire sample, a priori we elected to stratify our analyses to be less restrictive and enable the coefficients for the other variables to vary by the presence of close social contacts. Stratified analyses also allowed us to see how the association between a heart attack and/or stroke and subsequent depression may differ across strata in ways not captured by an interaction term (which was statistically significant in sensitivity analyses). Another limitation is that 250 participants died between the initial and follow-up interview and, given the morbidity associated with depression, heart attacks, strokes, and social isolation, it is likely that these deceased participants may have had relatively high levels of these conditions that could have further enriched our analyses; indeed, 4.8% of those without social contacts at baseline were deceased at follow-up compared to 3.2% of those with close social contacts. Unfortunately, we do not know the cause of death and our ability to examine the association of heart attacks, strokes, depressive symptoms, and close social contacts in the deceased participants is limited. An additional methodologic issue is that depression was not assessed with a diagnostic psychiatry interview such as the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (First et al., 2002). The PHQ-2, however, was validated against a structured mental health professional interview and performed well (Kroenke et al., 2003). Lastly, we do not know the temporal relationship between depressive symptoms and the occurrence of a heart attack or stroke. For instance, it is possible that a participant may have had a heart attack or stroke many months prior to the follow-up interview and, in the interim, experienced a significant life event (e.g., death of loved one, another acute illness) that may be a more proximal causal factor as to whether the older adult has clinically significant depressive symptoms.
Conclusion
Using a large nationally representative cohort sample of Medicare beneficiaries that assessed close social contacts and depressive symptoms at baseline and prospectively measured the occurrence of a heart attack, stroke, and depressive symptoms, we found that: 1) those with no close social contacts have increased odds for having depressive symptoms following a heart attack or stroke and 2) those with close social contacts have increased odds for having depressive symptoms following a stroke, but not following a heart attack. Future studies could consider examining whether different social support domains have a differential effect on outcomes in those experiencing heart attacks and strokes (or potentially other acute health events). Further exploration of the potential causal relationships suggested here could inform interventions to reduce depression and, possibly, illness-related morbidity and mortality.
Key Points.
This study examined a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the United States.
Those with no close social contacts have increased odds for having depressive symptoms following a heart attack or stroke.
Older adults with close social contacts have increased odds for having depressive symptoms following a stroke, but not following a heart attack.
Acknowledgments
The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging [U01AG032947] through a cooperative agreement with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. NHATS dataset is publicly available and is available at www.nhats.org. Dr. Simning is supported through the Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program, sponsored by the New York State Department of Health. The sponsors had no role in the manuscript’s study design and research questions, analyses and data interpretation, or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Sources of Funding: The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging [U01AG032947] through a cooperative agreement with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Dr. Simning is supported through the Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program, sponsored by the New York State Department of Health.
Footnotes
Presentation: Some of this article’s findings were presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry in Washington, D.C., March 17–20, 2016.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
- Aron AW, Staff I, Fortunato G, Mccullough LD. Prestroke living situation and depression contribute to initial stroke severity and stroke recovery. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Wolfe CD, Rudd AG. Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:14–21. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.107664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berkman LF, Blumenthal J, Burg M, et al. Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:3106–3116. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:843–857. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boden-Albala B, Litwak E, Elkind MS, Rundek T, Sacco RL. Social isolation and outcomes post stroke. Neurology. 2005;64:1888–1892. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163510.79351.AF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickens AP, Richards SH, Greaves CJ, Campbell JL. Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickens CM, Percival C, Mcgowan L, et al. The risk factors for depression in first myocardial infarction patients. Psychol Med. 2004;34:1083–1092. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704001965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders. New York: Biometrics Research: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Gravel G, et al. Social support, depression, and mortality during the first year after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000;101:1919–1924. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.16.1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke. 1993;24:64–70. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemingway H, Marmot M. Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 1999;318:1460–1467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:227–237. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang W, Davidson JR. Antidepressant therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 2005;150:871–881. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasper JD, Freedman VA. National Health and Aging Trends Study User Guide: Rounds 1, 2, 3 & 4 Final Release. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41:1284–1292. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lichtman JH, Froelicher ES, Blumenthal JA, et al. Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and recommendations: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:1350–1369. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:948–954. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luttik ML, Jaarsma T, Moser D, Sanderman R, Van Veldhuisen DJ. The importance and impact of social support on outcomes in patients with heart failure: an overview of the literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;20:162–169. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200505000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagayoshi M, Everson-Rose SA, Iso H, Mosley TH, Jr, Rose KM, Lutsey PL. Social network, social support, and risk of incident stroke: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Stroke. 2014;45:2868–2873. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Center for Health Statistics. Continuous NHANES web tutorial [Online] Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013. [Accessed January 28 2016]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/NHANES/using/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Ozbay F, Johnson DC, Dimoulas E, Morgan CA, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2007;4:35–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan A, Sun Q, Okereke OI, Rexrode KM, Hu FB. Depression and risk of stroke morbidity and mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review. JAMA. 2011;306:1241–1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson RG. Poststroke depression: prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and disease progression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:376–387. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00423-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shim RS, Baltrus P, Ye J, Rust G. Prevalence, treatment, and control of depressive symptoms in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2005–2008. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:33–38. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skala JA, Freedland KE, Carney RM. Coronary heart disease and depression: a review of recent mechanistic research. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51:738–745. doi: 10.1177/070674370605101203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vink D, Aartsen MJ, Schoevers RA. Risk factors for anxiety and depression in the elderly: a review. J Affect Disord. 2008;106:29–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ziegelstein RC. Depression in patients recovering from a myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2001;286:1621–1627. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]