Abstract
Nasopharyngeal myiases are caused by larvae of bot flies (Diptera: Oestridae), which have evolved a high specificity for their hosts. Bot flies (n = 916) were collected from 137 (57.6 %) out of 238 red deer (Cervus elaphus) hunted in Vorarlberg and Tyrol (Western Austria). After being stored in 75 % ethanol, larvae were identified to species level and developmental stage using morphological and morphometric keys. Larvae were also molecularly characterized by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and partial sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. Morphological and molecular analysis allowed identification of larvae as Cephenemyia auribarbis and Pharyngomyia picta. Genetic variations were also examined within the specimens collected in both geographical locations.
Keywords: Cephenemyia auribarbis, Cervus elaphus, Cytochrome oxidase subunit I, Myiasis, Oestridae, Pharyngomyia picta
Introduction
To date, nasopharyngeal bot flies have been mostly studied in relationship to the economic damage they cause in animal husbandry (Otranto et al. 2003). Nasopharyngeal bot flies are known to be host specific and to cause obligatory myiasis in a wide range of animal species (Catts and Mullen 2002). Their development is holometabolic but (compared to other insects) is characterized by being larviparous (Catts and Mullen 2002; Colwell 2001). Soon after adult flies spray the first-stage larvae into the nostrils of the host, larvae migrate into the nasal and sinus cavities of the pharynx (Colwell 2001) therefore causing irritation, rhinitis, nasal discharge, purulent mucous exudates, and respiratory problems (Catts and Mullen 2002). Red deer (Cervus elaphus) is the main host for the nasopharyngeal bot fly species Cephenemyia auribarbis and Pharyngomyia picta (Colwell 2001; Vicente et al. 2004), both belonging to the subfamily Oestrinae (Catts and Mullen 2002; Colwell 2001). In addition, Cephenemyia stimulator, which is adapted to roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (Colwell 2001), has on occasion been diagnosed in red deer (Király and Egri 2004, 2007). While the host spectrum of P. picta is broader, as this species can be detected regularly in red deer, sika deer (Cervus nippon), fallow deer (Dama dama), and roe deer, C. auribarbis is usually found in red deer and fallow deer only (Colwell 2001). Previous studies have shown that C. auribarbis occurs less frequently in red deer compared to P. picta (summarized in Vicente et al. 2004). Mixed infections of both C. auribarbis and P. picta in the same individual host were reported in Hungary (Sugár 1974) and in Spain (Ruíz Martinez and Palomares 1993), in 71.5 and 23.1 % of examined red deer, respectively.
Molecular tools have shown to be successful and reliable for diagnostic and taxonomic studies of oestrid larvae (Otranto and Stevens 2002), and in particular, the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (coxI) mitochondrial gene has been used in several studies for the diagnosis and phylogeny of larvae within this taxon (Otranto and Stevens 2006).
Although the majority of bot fly infections occur in wildlife hosts, there is a lack of knowledge regarding these oestrids (Colwell et al. 2009). The aim of this study was not only to examine the species diversity of bot flies in Western Austrian red deer but also the use of morphometric and molecular tools for the analysis of variations (inter- and intra-species) within populations of these oestrids in a limited regional area.
Materials and methods
During the course of a regular shooting program, 238 red deer were shot in Western Austria (183 in Vorarlberg and 55 in Tyrol) from April to July 2014 and sent to the AGES Institute for Veterinary Disease Control in Innsbruck, Austria, immediately for necropsy. Sampling location, date, and sex of the red deer were collected whenever possible. Nasopharyngeal bot fly larvae were sampled at necropsy, stored in 75 % ethanol at room temperature, and sent to the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria, for further analysis. Bot fly larvae were cleaned from host nasal secretion using soft toothbrushes and microscopically identified to species level and developmental stage using identification keys by Zumpt (1965), Sugár (1974), and Draber-Monko (1975). Thirteen larval samples from ten red deer were sent to the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Italy, for blinded species identification.
A subset of the specified bot fly larvae were further analyzed by additional morphological tools and molecular techniques. Larvae (n = 48; C. auribarbis L3 = 11 and L2 = 3 and P. picta L3 = 30 and L2 = 4) were measured with regard to the following: body length, from the tip to the end of the larva; body width at the widest part of the larva; shape of posterior spiracular plates; and distance between the antennal lobes at the base of the antenna (Nikon SMZ 1270 and NIS Elements D 4.30.02-software, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
DNA was extracted from 44 larvae (10 C. auribarbis and 34 P. picta) using the DNeasy™ Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplifications were performed with dipteran-specific barcode primers (H15CuliCOIFw:5′-AGCCATTTAATCGCGACAA-3′;H15CuliCOIRv:5′-GGATGTCCAAAAAATCAAAATAAATGTT-3′) in a Mastercycler Gradient S (Eppendorf, Germany) under conditions reported previously (Zittra et al. 2016). Amplification products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis on 1.8 % agarose gels at 120 V for 70 min. Subsequently, gels were stained with Midori Green Advance (Biozym Scientific GmbH, Hess. Oldendorf, Germany), and PCR amplicons of approximately 730 bp were visualized by UV light. DNA sequencing was performed at LGC GmbH (Berlin, Germany). All phylogenetic analyses were conducted with MEGA6 (Tamura et al. 2013), and sequences were aligned with ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) including Drosophila melanogaster as the out-group. The GTR model of sequence evolution with uniform rates was chosen by scanning 24 possible models and selecting the one with the lowest Bayesian information criterion. The tree was constructed by maximum likelihood using 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Results and discussion
Overall a total of 916 bot fly larvae—49 were identified as C. auribarbis and 827 as P. picta—were retrieved in 137 out of 238 red deer (57.6 %; 95 %CI, 51.2–63.7 %; Figs. 1 and 2). For 40 larval specimens, the morphological identification was not possible due to their poor condition. P. picta was documented in 130 red deer (54.6 %; 95 %CI, 48.3–60.8 %) whereas C. auribarbis was found in 19 red deer (8 %; 95 %CI, 5.2–12.1 %). Co-infections with both bot fly species were detected in 13 individual hosts (5.5 %; 95 %CI, 3.2–9.1 %). Both prevalence and distribution varied within the provinces sampled in Vorarlberg and Tyrol. C. auribarbis was only found in animals from Vorarlberg whereas P. picta was the prominent bot fly species in red deer in both regions (Vorarlberg, 56.3 %; Tyrol, 49.1 %). The prevalence of nasal bot fly in red deer is known to vary from 41.89 % in central Spain (De la Fuente et al. 2000) to 85 % in Spain (Bueno-de la Fuente et al. 1998), 90 % in southern Spain (Ruíz Martinez and Palomares 1993), and 98.2 % in Hungary (Sugár 1974). Our findings are in general agreement with these previous studies though the sampling season may affect the prevalence of bot flies in red deer and also the co-occurrence of both C. auribarbis and P. picta in the same host (cf. Vicente et al. 2004; Ruíz Martinez and Palomares 1993). Overall, P. picta was the dominant species found in this study, whereas C. auribarbis was rarely identified in infested animals in Vorarlberg and not in Tyrol. This may be related to the different developmental periods throughout the year (cf. Vicente et al. 2004; Ruíz Martinez and Palomares 1993). Concerning the seasonal dynamics in Vorarlberg, the number of larvae per host as well as the prevalence decreases throughout the sampled period from April to June (Table 1). Similar to the findings of Ruíz Martinez and Palomares (1993), no differences in the host preference between male and female infected hosts were observed in this study. The data conflict with previous observations by Vicente et al. (2004) and Bueno-de la Fuente et al. (1998) who recorded a higher prevalence in male hosts.
Table 1.
Positive hosts | Total hosts | Prevalence (%) | Mean larvae | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vorarlberg | ||||
April | 24 | 27 | 88.9 | 9.8 |
May | 54 | 88 | 61.4 | 5.9 |
June | 32 | 68 | 47.1 | 4.1 |
Tyrol | ||||
May | 15 | 20 | 75.0 | 6.7 |
June | 8 | 20 | 40.0 | 12.3 |
July | 4 | 15 | 26.7 | 4.5 |
The retrieval of the majority of L3 and any L1 larvae might be associated with the sampling season (the percentages of larval stages which could be clearly identified were P. picta: n L2 = 9.1 %, n L3 = 90.9 %; C. auribarbis: n L2 = 8.7 %, n L3 = 91.3 %). Morphometric analysis of the bases of the antennal lobes allowed differentiation of C. auribarbis L3 (mean value = 0.187 mm, σ = 0.08) from P. picta L3 (mean value = 0.482 mm, σ = 0.07). The mean body length of C. auribarbis L3 was 29.391 mm (σ = 2.21), compared to 24.939 mm (σ = 2.59) in P. picta (Table 2). For the morphological analysis, the general shape (especially the posterior spiracles) of the larvae, but also body length, dorsal spine rows, and pigmentation allowed species differentiation (cf. Zumpt 1965; Sugár 1974; Draber-Monko 1975).
Table 2.
Body width and length (mm) | L2 | L3 |
---|---|---|
P. picta body width | 5.368 (σ = 2.50) | 7.895 (σ = 0.56) |
P. picta body length | 17.534 (σ = 5.49) | 24.939 (σ = 2.59) |
C. auribarbis body width | 5.364 (σ = 0.56) | 7.489 (σ = 0.54) |
C. auribarbis body length | 16.009 (σ = 1.75) | 29.391 (σ = 2.21) |
Nucleotide sequences of 44 bot fly larvae (10 C. auribarbis and 34 P. picta) were analyzed within the barcode region of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. C. auribarbis and P. picta could be separated clearly showing variations in 87 loci (GenBank™: KX146909-KX146953). Furthermore intra- and inter-species variations were observed within the barcode region of C. auribarbis and P. picta (Fig. 3) therefore indicating that the selected target gene is effective for the species discrimination. However, further molecular-based studies are needed to monitor genetic variation within the populations of bot flies in Austria.
Acknowledgments
Open access funding provided by University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. Parts of this study are associated with the Austrian Barcode of Life Project (ABOL).
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval
All animals were killed in the course of the regular shooting program of the particular hunting area in consideration of the game law (Landesjagdgesetz) of Vorarlberg LGBl Nr. 32/1988 and Tyrol LGBl. Nr. 41/2004.
References
- Bueno-de la Fuente MI, Moreno V, Peréz JM, Ruíz-Martínez I, Soriguer RC. Oestrosis in red deer from Spain. J Wildlife Dis. 1998;34(4):820–824. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-34.4.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catts EP, Mullen GR. Myiasis (Muscoidea, Oestroidea) In: Mullen G, Durden L, editors. Medical and veterinary entomology. San Diego: Elsevier Science Academic Press; 2002. pp. 317–348. [Google Scholar]
- Colwell DD. Bot flies and warble flies (order Diptera: family Oestridae) In: Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA, editors. Parasitic diseases of wild mammals. 2. London: Manson Publishing; 2001. pp. 46–71. [Google Scholar]
- Colwell DD, Otranto D, Stevens JR. Oestrid flies: eradication and extinction versus biodiversity. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25(11):500–504. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De la Fuente C, San Miguel JM, Santín M, Alunda JM, Dominguéz I, López A, Carballo M, Gonzáles A. Pharyngeal bot flies in Cervus elaphus in central Spain: prevalence and population dynamics. J Parasitol. 2000;86(1):33–37. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0033:PBFICE]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Draber-Monko A. Morphologie einiger fliegenlarven der familie oestridae (Diptera) Ann Zool. 1975;32(10):239–247. [Google Scholar]
- Király I, Egri B. A Tolna megyei őzállomány orrgaratbagócos-fertőzöttségől [Nasopharyngeal bot infestation of roe deer population of Tolna county] Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja. 2004;126:433–438. [Google Scholar]
- Király I, Egri B. Epidemiological characteristics of Cephenemyia stimulator (Clark, 1815) larval infestation in European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Hungary. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung. 2007;53(3):271–279. [Google Scholar]
- Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Otranto D, Stevens JR. Molecular approaches to the study of myiasis-causing larvae. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32(11):1345–1360. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00095-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otranto D, Stevens JR. Molecular phylogeny and identification. In: Colwell DD, Hall MJR, Scholl PJ, editors. The Oestrid flies—biology, host-parasite relationships, impact and management. Cambridge: Cabi Publishing; 2006. pp. 51–66. [Google Scholar]
- Otranto D, Traversa D, Guida B, Tarsitano E, Fiorente P, Stevens JR. Molecular characterization of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene of oestridae species causing obligate myiasis. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17(3):307–315. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruíz Martinez I, Palomares F. Occurrence and overlapping of pharyngeal bot flies Pharyngomyia picta and Cephenemyia auribarbis (Oestridae) in red deer of southern Spain. Vet Parasitol. 1993;47(1–2):119–127. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90182-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sugár L. The occurrence of nasal throat bot flies (Oestridae) in wild ruminants in Hungary. Parasitologia Hungarica. 1974;7:181–189. [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(22):4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vicente J, Fierro Y, Martínez M, Gortázar C. Long-term epidemiology, effect on body condition and interspecific interactions of concomitant infection by nasopharyngeal bot fly larvae (Cephenemyia auribarbis and Pharyngomyia picta, Oestridae) in a population of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) Parasitology. 2004;129:349–361. doi: 10.1017/S0031182004005578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zittra C, Flechl E, Kothmayer M, Vitecek S, Rossiter H, Zechmeister FHP. Ecological characterization and molecular differentiation of the Culex pipiens complex taxa and Culex torrentium in Eastern Austria. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1495-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zumpt F. Myiasis in man and animals in the old world. London: Butterworth; 1965. pp. 141–153. [Google Scholar]