Abstract
Many methods have been developed to produce bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) for industrial application. However, huge challenges still remain in synthesizing whole length BsAbs, including their assembly, stability, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics. Here we present for first time a generic technology platform of generating bispecific IgG antibodies, “Bispecific Antibody by Protein Trans-splicing (BAPTS)”. Different from published methods, we assembled two parental antibody fragments in the hinge region by the protein trans-splicing reaction of a split intein to generate BsAbs without heavy/heavy and light/heavy chain mispairing. Utilizing this simple and efficient approach, there have been several BsAbs (CD3×HER2, CD3×EGFR, EGFR×HER2) synthesized to demonstrate its broad applicability. Correctly paired mAb arms were assembled to form BsAbs that were purified through protein A affinity chromatography to demonstrate industrial applicability at large scale. Further, the products were characterized through physical-biochemistry properties and biological activities to confirm expected quality of the products from “BAPTS”. More importantly, correct pairing was confirmed by mass spectrum. Proof-of-concept studies with CD3×HER2 BsAb (T-cell recruitment) demonstrated superior bioactivity compared with trastuzumab. The results of undetectable mispairing and high biological activity have indicated that this method has the potential to be utilized to manufacture BsAbs with high efficiency at industrial scale.
Introduction
Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are important therapeutic proteins1. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have demonstrated enhanced biological functions in many cases2–5. While natural antibodies are a ‘Y’ shape formed by two identical antigen-binding Fab arms connected to Fc domains, BsAbs are engineered to have two different antigen-binding Fab arms. As such, BsAbs may facilitate recruitment of cytotoxic T cells to tumor cells2, simultaneously inhibit two signaling pathways3, increase specificity for cells that express both antigens6, shuttle an antibody across the blood-brain barrier7, and neutralize HIV-14. Over the past two decades, structure modification of BsAbs by genetic engineering resulted in a range of recombinant BsAb formats8. However, the methods producing BsAbs with high efficiency and without mispairing still need further improvement. Up to now, catumaxomab and blinatumomab are the only two BsAbs approved on the market, partly due to the challenges in producing BsAbs.
BsAbs may present as bearing or lacking an Fc region. The BsAbs without Fc contain only two VL and two VH regions with artificial linkers, such as tandem scFv2 and diabodies9. These types of molecules cannot bind to the neonatal FcRn receptor, leading to rather rapid renal elimination in vivo. For example, the half-life of blinatumomab is only 1.25 ± 0.63 h10. In addition, the artificial linker could be potentially immunogenic11. The Fc region in a full-length antibody molecule facilitates purification through protein A binding and contributes to its solubility and stability. Additionally, Fc mediates effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), and extends in vivo half-life due to the increased size and FcRn-mediated recycling processes. Therefore, BsAbs with an Fc domain would be more desirable in many therapeutic applications.
Efforts to create bispecific antibodies with an Fc region resulted in dual variable domain IgGs (DVD-Ig)5 and IgG-scFv12, which are tetravalent unnatural formats, different in size and geometry from conventional IgG antibodies and may create potential immunogenicity13. Clinical applications prefer monovalent antigen recognition and natural IgG structure without potentially immunogenic linkers13, 14. Catumaxomab, containing complete nonhuman sequences, had immunological responses that accelerate clearance and inhibit its function in humans15. The “Dual Acting Fab (DAF)” approach can develop BsAb with human sequences, but is highly dependent on structural properties. It may be impossible to identify an ideal dual specific candidate that exhibits all desired properties16.
Chain mispairing is a major problem in making BsAbs. The “knobs-into-holes (KiH)” technology offers a way to minimize the heavy/heavy chains mispairing17, but not light/heavy chains mispairing. As the Fab domain is responsible for binding affinity, correct pairing of light/heavy chains is crucial. Solution with “common light chain”18 may not be optimal in binding specificity or possible for all BsAbs. A better approach was provided by CrossMab technology19. Correct pairing of the light chains is achieved by exchanging the CH1 domain of one heavy chain with the CL domain of the corresponding light chain. This approach has been used to create therapeutic BsAbs for anti-virus applications4, 20, 21. But in “CrossMab” technology, unnatural domain junctions were generated and natural antibody architecture was replaced. Another approach is to express mAbs separately22–24, then combine the two mAbs under mild refolding conditions to form a hybrid BsAb molecule. However, its application is largely limited due to product instability and potential immunogenicity24. A similar strategy was presented by Spiess et al., who co-cultured two E. coli strains expressing corresponding half of each mAb that was refolded to synthesize BsAb. Lacking post-translational modification may result in differences in biological functions, stability and in vivo half-life25, 26. Lewis et al. reported an “orthogonal interface mutation” strategy to minimize light/heavy chains mispairing. It requires 15 – 20 mutations that might create immunogenicity26. So far, it is only applicable to kappa but not lambda variable domains26, 27.
“Protein Trans-splicing (PTS)” has been developed in research laboratories for protein splicing and ligation. In PTS, split inteins are used to create a new peptide bond between their flanking exteins. Split inteins comprise N-terminal fragment (IntN) and C-terminal fragment (IntC). Fragment complementation leads to reconstitution of the canonical intein fold, recovery of protein splicing activity, and ligation of the exteins28. Split inteins have been used for various practical applications, including protein ligation or labeling29, 30, protein reconstitution31, 32 and protein purification33.
We report a platform for synthesizing BsAbs with natural human IgG architecture and elimination of mispaired chains. In this method, two antibody fragments carrying different target-specificities are separately expressed in mammalian cells and subsequently fused to form BsAbs by utilizing the trans-spliced property of the split intein Npu DnaE. Three BsAbs were synthesized with this method. The products have been confirmed for their dual binding affinities and expected biochemical-physical properties, as well as associated biological activities.
Results
Design of bispecific antibody molecule assembly
Antibody is composed of two Fab domains and one dimer Fc domain for biological functions. During maturation of an antibody in nature, heavy chains go through dimerization first, followed by light chains pairing with heavy chains34. Due to the criticality of antibody molecular assembly, it is preferable to maintain this process, i.e., the pairing of heavy/heavy and light/heavy chains as it occurs naturally. Therefore, we chose to synthesize two antibody arms, one arm with dimer Fc domain and the other without, and both separately expressed in two mammalian cells, so eliminated light/heavy chains mispairing. The hinge region, a region with less functional impact, was selected for conjugating the two arms. The conjugation can be accomplished either chemically or enzymatically. In our method, we chose a split intein for its capability of conjugating two peptides by autocatalytic “PTS”. The two parts of mAbs arms carrying necessary intein components were connected through “PTS” to form a BsAb (Fig. 1). We called this molecular approach “BAPTS” (“Bispecific Antibody by Protein Trans-Splicing”), which solved the light/heavy chain mispairing problem. The “Knobs-into-Holes” or other Fc engineering methods could also be adopted in our molecular construction to enhance correct pairing of the heavy chains. We demonstrated, by characterizing the BsAbs generated from the “BAPTS”, that no differences were expected or detected in antigen-binding behavior of the BsAbs compared to parental mAbs.
Generation of bispecific antibody by “BAPTS”
The BsAb fragments A and B (CD3xHER2) were produced by transient expression in HEK293E cells from three expression plasmids (coding CD3-Lc, CD3-HK and IntCFcH respectively) for fragment A and two expression plasmids (coding HER2-HN and HER2-Lc) for fragment B (Supplementary Table 1). All antibody fragments were purified via standard protein L affinity chromatography. The fragment A could be reduced into three peptides CD3-Lc, CD3-HK and IntCFcH. Likewise, the fragment B could be reduced into two peptides, HER2-HN and HER2-Lc (Fig. 2a). The expression titers for both fragments were in the range between 10–100 mg/L, which is quite normal as for a conventional IgG1 recombinant antibody expressed by transient gene expression system. Fragments A and B were fused by in vitro protein trans-splicing reaction. After the reaction, a new band was observed on the SDS-PAGE at the position corresponding in size to the expected splice product BsAb (CD3×ER2). DTT concentration range of 0 – 5 mM was used to facilitate the trans-splicing reaction. The reaction reached the plateau at 0.5 mM DTT, as no further obvious increase of trans-spliced product from 0.5 mM to 5 mM (Fig. 2b,c). A concentration of 0.5 mM DTT did not have an impact on antibody structure. We also observed some other impure bands showing increase or decrease besides of disappearance of reaction substrate fragments A and B (Fig. 2b), IntCFcH and HN (Fig. 2c). The band between 40 KDa and 55 KDa represented dimeric light chain and the band at 25 KDa represented the monomeric light chain (Fig. 2b). In the process of reaction, light chain dimer was formed after re-oxidation while the monomer was decreased correspondingly since DTT could reduce exposed cysteine of free monomeric light chain. The band of 15 KDa was formed due to cleaved IntN and it was increased as the process going (Fig. 2b). As shown in time course experiments at 37°C, 90% of raw material was consumed within 25 min after the reaction started (Fig. 2d). Even at low temperature 4°C, the reaction was nearly completed to generate the product within 2 hours, indicating overall low activation energy required for the reaction (data not shown). The low reaction activation energy confirmed that the “BAPTS” approach is feasible for industrial application.
The product BsAb was purified from the system efficiently through affinity purification steps. Unreacted fragment A was removed by capturing on Sepharose affinity column through the His-tag. The product was isolated from the rest of reaction mixture by protein A affinity chromatography to remove fragment B (Fig. 3). Besides CD3×HER2, two other BsAbs (EGFR×HER2 and CD3×EGFR) were also produced through “BAPTS” with similar outcome, indicating that the “BAPTS” could be used as a generic technology platform for BsAb production.
Characterization of the bispecific antibodies
Purified BsAb (CD3×HER2) was characterized through standard physical and biochemical methods, including mass spectrometry, DSF and SPR. Ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight (IMS Q-Tof) mass spectrometry was utilized to identify molecular mass and chains assembly of the BsAbs (Fig. 4a–d, Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 2). The theoretical molecular mass of the BsAb (CD3×HER2) was confirmed by IMS Q-Tof. The intact antibody was the main peak that exhibited a molecular mass closely matching the predicted mass of the heterodimeric BsAb (CD3×HER2). After deglycosylation, the measured masses of the BsAb (CD3×HER2) were 146,174 Da, 146,302 Da and 146,336 Da, which were agreed with the theoretical molecular masses of the intact molecular C-terminal lysine variants and oxidative modification variants. There was no evidence of knob/knob or hole/hole homodimer formation, indicating that heavy chain mispairing was below limit of detection (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Figure 2a,b and Supplementary Table 2). After deglycosylation and reduction, the BsAb (CD3×HER2) clearly showed the presence of two different light chains (23,330.0 Da and 23,440.0 Da) and two different heavy chains (49,465.0 Da and 49,649.0 Da) (Fig. 4b,c, Supplementary Figure 2c,d and Supplementary Table 2). Sample of Fig. 4a was deglycosylated without reducing, and hole/hole dimer was modified with 2 GSH, leading to higher hole/hole dimer comparing to knob/knob dimer. Sample of Fig. 4c was deglycosylated and reduced, and the MW of knob is higher than hole due to removal of GSH after reduction. Further more, the BsAb (CD3×HER2) also maintained the correct pairing of the light chains to cognate heavy chains along with trans-splicing reaction, as confirmed by papain digestion (which hydrolyzes Fab domains from Fc) followed by mass spectrometry analysis (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Figure 2e,f and Supplementary Table 2). DSF study was performed to assess the overall stability of the BsAbs. While the two parental IgGs (trastuzumab and anti-CD3 mAb) have different onset temperatures of 60.9°C and 57.6°C and different Tm of 69.6°C and 66.8°C, the BsAb (CD3×HER2) exhibited an onset temperature of 58.5°C and Tm of 67.5°C (Fig. 4e and Table 1). The affinities (monovalent) for the BsAb (CD3×HER2) and the parental antibodies were determined by SPR to confirm that the affinities of the BsAb to their respective ligands were consistent with those of the parental antibodies (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 3). In addition, the BsAb (EGFR×HER2) binding to both targets were demonstrated by a sandwich SPR assay (Fig. 4f). The results of characterization are consistent with our design expectations, i.e., the BsAbs stably maintained target binding affinities, likely due to the natural maturation of Fab. Our results also indicated that “BAPTS” is an efficient approach to overcome chain mispairing problems.
Table 1.
Antibody | Onset | Tm |
---|---|---|
CD3×HER2 BsAb | 58.5°C | 67.5°C |
Trastuzumab | 60.9°C | 69.6°C |
Anti-CD3 mAb | 57.6°C | 66.8°C |
Table 2.
Antibody | Ka (1/Ms) | Kd (1/s) | KD (nM) |
---|---|---|---|
CD3×HER2 BsAb (CD3) | 7.723E+4 | 1.202E-3 | 15.56 |
Monovalent anti-CD3 mAb (CD3) | 1.455E+5 | 3.331E-3 | 22.81 |
CD3×HER2 BsAb (HER2) | 4.894E+5 | 5.976E-5 | 0.1221 |
Monovalent Trastuzumab (HER2) | 4.466E+5 | 9.046E-5 | 0.2026 |
In vitro biological activity
One panel of cancer cell lines with predetermined numbers of HER2 and EGFR molecules on the cell surface membrane were selected for cytotoxicity studies of the BsAb (CD3×HER2) (Supplementary Figure 4a). The bispecific antibody can induce tumor cell lysis. Typically the T-cell-receptor–associated CD3ε component on T cells is engaged with one arm of the BsAb, whereas the other arm engages with a tumor-specific HER2 antigen. HER2 amplified cell lines were significantly more sensitive to the BsAb (CD3×HER2) than those with low levels of HER2. Notably, cancer cell lines such as McF-7 and HepG2 appeared insensitive to trastuzumab were sensitive to BsAb (CD3×HER2). Additionally, signs of T-cell activation (expressing CD69 and secreting IL-2) were detectable after the BsAb (CD3×HER2) treatment (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Figure 4b,c). Only in the presence of target cells, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells could be fully activated by BsAb (CD3×HER2), while slightly activated by anti-CD3 mAb. In addition, after the treatment of BsAb (CD3×HER2), T cells were apparently redirected to tumor cells (Fig. 5c). FACS analysis results also showed a higher ratio of CFSE+/PKH26+ cells after the treatment of BsAb than trastuzumab, which indicated that BsAb could efficiently bind CD3+ Jurkat cells and HER2+ NCI-N87 cells together (Fig. 5d). “BAPTS” not only maintained BsAbs’ affinity but also appeared to have better in vitro bioactivity than the parental mAb.
In vivo biological activity
In vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the BsAb (CD3×HER2) and trastuzumab were analyzed in male Balb/c mice. Mice were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) a single dose of 5 mg/kg. The BsAb (CD3×HER2) displayed a biphasic disposition, which was a typical display of an IgG1 with a short distribution and slow elimination phases. PK parameters were consistent with those of the parental antibodies (Fig. 6a,b). In addition, in vivo tumor inhibition by BsAb (CD3×HER2) and trastuzumab was evaluated in female NOD/SCID mice. NCI-N87 cells were grafted together with non-activated human PBMCs from healthy donors to the mice subcutaneously. Mice were dosed intraperitoneally on a weekly schedule with 0.33 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg of BsAb (CD3×HER2) and 1.5 mg/kg of trastuzumab control or negative control PBS 10 mL/kg as placebo, starting on the 1st day after inoculation. As data shown, low dose BsAb (CD3×HER2) had much stronger inhibitory effect on tumor growth compared with trastuzumab (Fig. 6c,d). The BsAb produced by “BAPTS” maintained expected PK the same as parental mAb, indicating that hinge region minor modification caused minimum alteration in metabolic profile. “PTS” introduced stable peptide bond effectively held the integrity of BsAb in vivo.
Discussion
Several methods have been developed to produce BsAbs at industrial scale. However, synthesis of full length BsAbs without misfolding or chain mispairing has not been completely achieved. Compared with mAb, manufacturing BsAb has been suboptimal in not only the production yield but also product quality, mainly caused by chain mispairing. In this report, BsAbs were synthesized efficiently by taking advantage of the protein fusion function of a split intein. With this approach, several BsAbs were synthesized at feasible productivity. The BAPTS is a platform that allows correct assembly of two heavy chains and two light chains, derived from possibly any existing or new antibodies, to form bispecific bivalent IgG antibodies without use of any linkers.
The “BAPTS” is a thermodynamically favored reaction, illustrating feasible application of the approach. In addition, a couple of amino acids including one cysteine residue fused with IntC may facilitate the intein trans-splicing reaction as previously reported35. Cysteine residues may serve as an additional modification site for connecting either a bioactive peptide or a peptide toxin that may provide additional biological activities in this platform. Furthermore, additional residues could be inserted to increase the distance and the flexibility between the two arms of the BsAbs, which might be needed in optimizing connections between two cells, such as a tumor cell and a T cell. Optimization of the space between cells might further increase biological activity of the BsAbs, which is under further study.
The applicability of this approach has been confirmed by several combinations of mAb arms, including CD3×HER2, EGFR×HER2, and CD3×EGFR, indicating this approach may be broadly suitable for similar molecules (data not shown). Besides of conjugation in the Fab region using “BAPTS”, this approach could also be used for conjugating either bio-active peptides or peptide toxins/drugs to form BsAb drug conjugates or BsAb immunotoxins.
One manufacturing challenge in producing BsAbs is purification of the final product. Most of reported methods have shown that removal of those product-related impurities is particularly difficult. In “BAPTS” system, a His-tag was fused with starting antibody fragments, so both starting fragments as expressed precursors remaining after processing could be removed in the end of production through highly efficient affinity chromatography. The product BsAb was purified through protein A chromatography step to reach excellent yield and good quality (Fig. 3). Purified products were characterized intensively through physical and biochemical methods, in vitro bio-activities (T-cell based anti-tumor profiling and T-cell activation), and in vivo animal tumor inhibition experiments. Data consistently suggested that the BsAbs generated through “BAPTS” contain bi-affinity towards either CD3×HER2 or CD3×EGFR or EGFR×HER2 with similar KD as reference molecules36, 37. Using a comparable dose as trastuzumab to the NOD/SCID mice, tumors were inhibited significantly more by the BsAb molecule than by trastuzumab, which is consistent to the previous reports36, 38. The final product was intensively characterized by utilizing mass spectrometry to confirm mispairing product-related impurities were under limit of detection.
Although the “BAPTS” platform generated three correctly assembled BsAbs, further work is needed to determine whether this approach can be applicable to all IgG types (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, κ light chain and λ light chain) and to demonstrate production at large scale. One can also utilize the system for stocking one mAb arm as a generic partner for a series of products. For example, an anti-CD3 antibody could be a common partner used for conjugating with several other antibody fragments to form a number of BsAbs. This platform technology could become a highly efficient methodology to develop many BsAbs.
In summary, “BAPTS” allowed correct assembly of heavy/heavy chains and light/heavy chains, derived from existing antibodies tested in this report and potentially any other antibodies, to form bispecific bivalent natural architecture IgG antibodies without the use of any synthetic linkers. With the use of this platform, no chain mispairing was observed in the product.
Methods
Plasmid construction
All antibody genes and Npu DnaE genes were ordered as gene syntheses and cloned via unique restriction sites using standard cloning procedures into separate expression vectors pCEP4 (Invitrogen) enabling secretory expression in HEK293E cells growing in suspension. Npu DnaEN was cloned behind the CH1 domain of Fab, and CD40 extracellular region fused Npu DnaEC was cloned before the Fc domain. A detailed description of the expression plasmids used in this study can be found in the Supplementary Table 1. The construct number 1, 2 and 3 were used to express fragment A, and the construct 4 and 5 were used to express fragment B.
Transient antibody expression in HEK293E
Each plasmid was prepared using the TM Endo-free Plasmid Maxi Kit (Omega Bio-Tek) following manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were centrifuged prior to transfection and re-suspended at a cell density of 6 million cells/mL in freestyle 293 medium. The DNA was diluted with freestyle 293 medium containing supplements to a concentration of 40 μg/mL and mixed with 25-KD polyethyleneimine (PEI; Polysciences) (DNA:PEI = 1:5, w:w) for an incubation at room temperature for 10 – 15 minutes. Half microgram of plasmid DNA (with an equal ratio of each plasmid) was used in one milliliter of transfection volume. Then the mixture of DNA and PEI was added to the cell culture. Four hours after transfection, cells were diluted with SFM4 HEK293 medium to a cell density of 3 million cells/mL, and valproic acid (VPA, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to a final concentration of 3.8 mM. Twenty four hours post-transfections, 20% TN-1 was added to the culture to a final concentration of 0.5% (w:v). Supernatant either at the time of one week post-transfection or with the cell viability under 50% was taken for analysis or processing39, 40.
Antibody isolation and purification
A simplified expression and purification schematic was developed in Fig. 3a. Briefly, Antibody fragments were purified by protein L affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare) from filtered cell culture supernatants referring to standard protocols. The supernatants were loaded and equilibrated with binding buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Elution of antibodies was achieved at pH 2.8 (0.1 M sodium citrate) with a 20 CV linear gradient from 0% to 100%, followed by immediate neutralization of the sample. The samples were dialyzed overnight to splicing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.9), followed by splicing reaction of the antibody fragments catalyzed by the split intein. Imidazole were added into the splicing product at 30 mM final concentration, then the reaction mixture went into the Ni Sepharose affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare) and flowthrough containing the BsAb was collected. The flowthrough collect was further purified through protein A affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare). Antibody was eluted at pH 2.8 (0.1 M sodium citrate) with an elution of 20 CV linear gradient from 0% to 100%. The eluates were neutralized immediately, dialyzed overnight to PBS, and filter-sterilized over 0.22 μM dead-end filters. The protein concentration of the samples was measured by BCA protein assay kit.
Intein catalyzed antibody splicing
For DnaE mediated protein trans-splicing, 10 μM fragment A was mixed with 10 μM fragment B in splicing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.9). DTT was added to a final concentration of 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 mM. After incubation at 37°C for 2 hours, the splicing reaction was stopped by removing reducing agents (DTT) through dialysis overnight at 4°C.
Mass spectrometric determination of bispecific antibody assembly
The total mass of deglycosylated and reduced as well as papain digested bispecific antibodies were determined by ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight (Acquity VION IMS Q-Tof, waters). Briefly, the purified BsAb samples (1.5 mg/mL) were concentrated into 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate by a factor of 10 (15 mg/mL) by filtration through 30 KDa MWCO membranes. The concentrated sample (0.5 – 1 mg) was deglycosylated with 500 U PNGase F (NEB) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, at 37 °C for 24 h at a protein concentration of up to 15 mg/mL. The deglycosylated sample was diluted with 5% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid to obtain 0.5 mg/mL, and used for LC/MS analysis (1 μL). Sample was divided into two equal aliquots. The deglycosylated sample was diluted with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate to obtain 0.5 mg/mL, and then diluted sample was incubated with 20 mM DTT (Sigma) for 60 min at 50°C. The deglycosylated and reduced sample was used for LC/MS analysis (1 μL). The bispecific antibody was partially digested with papain (no cysteine system). For the digestions, stock BsAb was diluted with cysteine free papain digestion buffer (1 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.3) to obtain 0.5 mg/mL. Papain was activated by adding one papain suspension (10 mg/mL, sigma) to nine parts freshly prepared activation buffer (1 mM EDTA, 10 mM cysteine, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0), and incubating at 37°C for 15 min. The excess cysteine was removed by buffer exchange against 6 volume of cysteine free digestion buffer. The activated papain was then added to the BsAb solution at enzyme: BsAb ratio of 1% (w/w), and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Followed, the papain digested sample was diluted with 5% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid to obtain 0.5 mg/mL, and used for LC/MS analysis (1 μL). All of three sample were subsequently separated by RP-UPLC (Acquity I-Class, waters) on ACQUITY UPLC Protein BEH C4 column (300 Å, 1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm, waters); eluents were 0.1% FA in water (eluent A) and 0.1% FA in acetonitrile (eluent B) and the flow rate was 300 μL/min. The column was heated at 80°C to enhance separation. The UPLC was directly coupled with the Waters Acquity VION IMS Q-Tof mass spectrometer. The MS signals were collected and deconvoluted with UNIFI 1.8 software of Waters.
Affinity measurement of the bispecific antibodies
Affinity of the antibodies (bispecific antibodies and monovalent antibody fragments) was determined using surface plasmon resonance (Biacore T200, GE). The Fragments A and B are monovalent for CD3 and HER2, they are used as monovalent controls. Human HER2-Fc and CD3D×CD3E heterodimer were immobilized to a CM5 chip surface using standard 1-ethyl-3 (3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) amine coupling protocols. The running buffer (and dilution buffer) was PBS + 0.1% Tween 20. The chip surface was regenerated by 0.1 M glycine, pH1.5. The concentration series were fit to a 1:1 binding model to determine the binding (Ka) and dissociation (Kd) rate constants and the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD). To demonstrate simultaneous binding, human Her2-Fc was coupled to a CM5 sensor chip as described above. The bispecific antibody (EGFR×HER2) was injected for 1 min followed by 1-min injection of EGFR-Fc (at a concentration of 10 μg/mL). Surfaces were regenerated using 10 s injections of 0.1 M glycine, pH 1.5. Trastuzumab was injected as controls.
Differential scanning fluorimetry analysis
Thermal stability of the product was measured by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) using the Prometheus NT. 48 instrument. For this, 10 μL of 200 μg/mL antibody was loaded onto nanoDSF grade standard capillaries. Thermal unfolding of antibody was analyzed in a thermal ramp from 20°C to 95°C with a heating rate of 1°C/min.
In vitro cytotoxicity assays
Target cells (1 × 104 cells/well) were seeded on 96-well cell culture plates (Corning). Second day antibodies were pre-incubated for 30 minutes in 37 °C in culture medium(no phenol RPMI 1640 + 10% FBS + 2 mM L-glutamine) before adding the human PBMCs in a 10:1 E/T ratio. The cells were incubated for an additional 20 hours before detecting death by measuring the lactate dehydrogenase activity from the medium using CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (LDH; Promega). All measurements were done in triplicate. The percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated as follows: cytotoxicity% = (experimental lysis – spontaneous effector lysis − spontaneous target lysis)/(maximum target lysis − spontaneous target lysis) × 100.
Analysis of T-cell activation
Early signs of T-cell activation (CD69) were detectable after bispecific antibody treatment was initiated. CD3+ positive T cells were isolated by dynabeads (11365D, Invitrogen) according the standard protocol. Purified CD3+ T Cells were stimulated by 100 ng/mL BsAbs, mAbs and isotype control, then cultural supernatant and cells were collected. The stimulated CD3+ cells were stained with CD8-FITC (BD Biosciences; 555634) and CD69-APC (BD Biosciences; 560967) followed by FACS analysis. Secreted IL-2 in cell cultural supernatant was measure by IL-2 immunoassay kit (R&D Systems; 876970).
Analysis of T-cell redirection
HER2 positive NCI-N87 cells were labeled with CFSE (Invitrogen; C34554) and CD3 positive Jurkat cells were labeled with PKH26 (Sigma; PKH26GL) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The labeled cells were mixed at equal ratio, then treated with BsAb (CD3 × HER2) or trastuzumab for 30 minutes at 4°C. FACS analysis was performed to detect CFSE+/PKH26+ cell assembly.
Pharmacokinetic study in mice
All animal studies were conducted under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Pharmacy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Male Balb/c (6 – 8 weeks old) mice (N = 5/group) were dosed intraperitoneally (i.p.) with either BsAb (CD3×HER2) or trastuzumab at 5 mg/kg. Serum samples were assayed for human IgG by ELISA and PK parameters were determined with a non-compartmental analysis model using WinNonlin.
Xenograft tumor studies
Dosing and monitoring were performed in accordance with guidelines from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Pharmacy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Female NOD/SCID (6 – 8 weeks, Charles River) mice (N = 8/group) were implanted with NCI-N87 cells and human PBMCs. On day 0, 5 million NCI-N87 cells and 1.67 million inactivated human PBMCs in PBS were inoculated subcutaneously. The first treatment was administered 1 day after inoculation. All treatments were administered once a week by intraperitoneal injection.
Animal experiment statement
All methods were conducted in accordance with guidelines from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Pharmacy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and all experimental protocols were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Pharmacy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants donating blood.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Jecho laboratories, Inc. Authors would like to thank Qianqian Zhang, Lankun Song, and Hui Wang of Waters Technology (Shanghai) Company Limited for their analytical support with mass spectrometry analysis. We would thank Dr. Jianrong Xu of Basic Medicine faculty at Shanghai JiaoTong University for his assistance in affinity analysis by Biacore T200. Thanks to Dr. Cedric Cagliero at Jecho Laboratories, Inc for his critical review and comments for the manuscript. In particular we would like to thank Jingjing Li and Yuexian Zhou for help in assessing in PK study of the bispecific antibodies. This work has been supported by a grant to Jianwei Zhu from Natural Science Foundation #81473127, and a grant to Jianwei Zhu from Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission: #15DZ0503700.
Author Contributions
Lei Han: strategic design, methodology development, implementation of experiments, manuscript preparation and revision. Junsheng Chen: strategic discussion, assistance in HPLC analysis, sequencing data analysis. Kai Ding: experimental implementation, reagent preparation. Huifang Zong: experimental implementation, reagent preparation. Yueqing Xie: strategic discussion, review and revision of the manuscript. Hua Jiang: strategic discussion, review and revision of the manuscript. Baohong Zhang: data discussion, review and revision of manuscript. Huili Lu: data discussion, review and revision of manuscript. Weihan Yin: reagent preparation, assistance in experiments. John Gilly: strategic discussion, review and revision of the manuscript. Jianwei Zhu: project initiation, strategic design, direction and critical data review, manuscript preparation, revision, and reviewing.
Competing Interests
Y.X., H.J., and J.Z. are employees of Jecho 566 Laboratories Inc.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08641-3
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Zhu J. Mammalian cell protein expression for biopharmaceutical production. Biotechnology advances. 2012;30:1158–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bargou R, et al. Tumor regression in cancer patients by very low doses of a T cell-engaging antibody. Science. 2008;321:974–977. doi: 10.1126/science.1158545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schaefer G, et al. A two-in-one antibody against HER3 and EGFR has superior inhibitory activity compared with monospecific antibodies. Cancer cell. 2011;20:472–486. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huang Y, et al. Engineered Bispecific Antibodies with Exquisite HIV-1-Neutralizing Activity. Cell. 2016;165:1621–1631. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu C, et al. Simultaneous targeting of multiple disease mediators by a dual-variable-domain immunoglobulin. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1290–1297. doi: 10.1038/nbt1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Metz S, et al. Bispecific digoxigenin-binding antibodies for targeted payload delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:8194–8199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018565108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu YJ, et al. Boosting brain uptake of a therapeutic antibody by reducing its affinity for a transcytosis target. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beck A, Wurch T, Bailly C, Corvaia N. Strategies and challenges for the next generation of therapeutic antibodies. Nature reviews. Immunology. 2010;10:345–352. doi: 10.1038/nri2747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chames P, Baty D. Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: the light at the end of the tunnel? mAbs. 2009;1:539–547. doi: 10.4161/mabs.1.6.10015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Klinger M, et al. Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell-engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood. 2012;119:6226–6233. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-400515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Demarest SJ, Glaser SM. Antibody therapeutics, antibody engineering, and the merits of protein stability. Current opinion in drug discovery & development. 2008;11:675–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Coloma MJ, Morrison SL. Design and production of novel tetravalent bispecific antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15:159–163. doi: 10.1038/nbt0297-159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Klein C, et al. Progress in overcoming the chain association issue in bispecific heterodimeric IgG antibodies. mAbs. 2012;4:653–663. doi: 10.4161/mabs.21379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jin H, et al. MetMAb, the one-armed 5D5 anti-c-Met antibody, inhibits orthotopic pancreatic tumor growth and improves survival. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4360–4368. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ruf P, et al. Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and bioactivity of the therapeutic antibody catumaxomab intraperitoneally administered to cancer patients. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2010;69:617–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03635.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bostrom J, et al. Variants of the antibody herceptin that interact with HER2 and VEGF at the antigen binding site. Science. 2009;323:1610–1614. doi: 10.1126/science.1165480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carter P. Bispecific human IgG by design. Journal of immunological methods. 2001;248:7–15. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(00)00339-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Merchant AM, et al. An efficient route to human bispecific IgG. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16:677–681. doi: 10.1038/nbt0798-677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schaefer W, et al. Immunoglobulin domain crossover as a generic approach for the production of bispecific IgG antibodies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108:11187–11192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019002108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Montefiori DC. Bispecific antibodies against HIV. Cell. 2016;165:1563–1564. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bournazos S, et al. Bispecific Anti-HIV-1 Antibodies with Enhanced Breadth and Potency. Cell. 2016;165:1609–1620. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Labrijn AF, et al. Efficient generation of stable bispecific IgG1 by controlled Fab-arm exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:5145–5150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220145110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shatz W, et al. Knobs-into-holes antibody production in mammalian cell lines reveals that asymmetric afucosylation is sufficient for full antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. mAbs. 2013;5:872–881. doi: 10.4161/mabs.26307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Strop P, et al. Generating bispecific human IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies from any antibody pair. J Mol Biol. 2012;420:204–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Spiess C, et al. Bispecific antibodies with natural architecture produced by co-culture of bacteria expressing two distinct half-antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:753–758. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rouet R, Christ D. Bispecific antibodies with native chain structure. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:136–137. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lewis SM, et al. Generation of bispecific IgG antibodies by structure-based design of an orthogonal Fab interface. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:191–198. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vila-Perello M, Muir TW. Biological applications of protein splicing. Cell. 2010;143:191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Züger S, Iwai H. Intein-based biosynthetic incorporation of unlabeled protein tags into isotopically labeled proteins for NMR studies. Nature biotechnology. 2005;23:736–740. doi: 10.1038/nbt1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Borra R, et al. In-cell fluorescence activation and labeling of proteins mediated by FRET-quenched split inteins. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:6344–6353. doi: 10.1021/ja300209u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ozawa T, et al. A genetic approach to identifying mitochondrial proteins. Nature biotechnology. 2003;21:287–293. doi: 10.1038/nbt791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Subramanyam P, et al. Manipulating L-type calcium channels in cardiomyocytes using split-intein protein transsplicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:15461–15466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308161110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guan D, Ramirez M, Chen Z. Split intein mediated ultra-rapid purification of tagless protein (SIRP) Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110:2471–2481. doi: 10.1002/bit.24913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Feige MJ, Hendershot LM, Buchner J. How antibodies fold. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2010;35:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cheriyan M, Pedamallu CS, Tori K, Perler F. Faster protein splicing with the Nostoc punctiforme DnaE intein using non-native extein residues. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288:6202–6211. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.433094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Junttila TT, et al. Antitumor efficacy of a bispecific antibody that targets HER2 and activates T cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5561–5571. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3622-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reusch U, et al. A tetravalent bispecific TandAb (CD19/CD3), AFM11, efficiently recruits T cells for the potent lysis of CD19(+) tumor cells. mAbs. 2015;7:584–604. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2015.1029216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jager M, et al. The trifunctional antibody ertumaxomab destroys tumor cells that express low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4270–4276. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ding, K. et al. Production process reproducibility and product quality consistency of transient gene expression in HEK293 cells with anti-PD1 antibody as the model protein. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Zhu, J. Update on Production of Recombinant Therapeutic Protein: Transient Gene Expression (ed. Zhu, J.) (Smithers Rapra Technology Ltd, 2013).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.