Abstract
β-lactam antibiotics act as suicide substrates of transpeptidases responsible for the last cross-linking step of peptidoglycan synthesis in the bacterial cell wall. Nucleophilic attack of the β-lactam carbonyl by the catalytic residue (Ser or Cys) of transpeptidases results in the opening of the β-lactam ring and in the formation of a stable acyl-enzyme. The acylation reaction is considered as irreversible due to the strain of the β-lactam ring. In contradiction with this widely accepted but poorly demonstrated premise, we show here that the acylation of the L,D-transpeptidase Ldtfm from Enterococcus faecium by the β-lactam nitrocefin is reversible, leading to limited antibacterial activity. Experimentally, two independent methods based on spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry provided evidence that recyclization of the β-lactam ring within the active site of Ldtfm regenerates native nitrocefin. Ring strain is therefore not sufficient to account for irreversible acylation of peptidoglycan transpeptidases observed for most β-lactam antibiotics.
Introduction
β-lactams remain the corner stone of antibacterial chemotherapy 76 years after the first therapeutic use of an antibiotic, namely penicillin, in 1941. β-lactams kill bacteria by inactivating the D,D-transpeptidases responsible for the last cross-linking step of peptidoglycan synthesis1. The latter cell wall polymer is a giant macromolecule of 109 to 1010 daltons that completely surrounds bacterial cells and plays an essential role in counteracting the osmotic pressure of the cytoplasm during the entire cell cycle including cell division2. β-lactams are structure analogues of the peptidoglycan precursors and act as suicide substrates of the transpeptidases3. The enzymes catalyze formation of peptidoglycan cross-links in a two-step reaction4. In the first step, the D,D-transpeptidases interact with an acyl donor containing a pentapeptide stem ending in D-Ala4-D-Ala5, leading to the release of D-Ala5 and to the formation of an ester bond between the carbonyl of D-Ala4 and the catalytic Ser residue of the enzymes. In the second step, nucleophilic attack of the resulting acyl-enzyme by the acyl acceptor generates the peptidoglycan cross-link. Similar to the first step of the transpeptidation reaction, nucleophilic attack of the carbon carbonyl of β-lactams by the catalytic Ser leads to rupture of the amide bond of the β-lactam ring and inactivation of the D,D-transpeptidases. The resulting acyl-enzymes are highly stable, with typical half-lives in the order of several hours, due to low hydrolysis rates. For this reason, the inactivation reaction is considered as irreversible since recovery of enzyme activity through hydrolysis of the drug-enzyme adduct occurs at a timescale that is too large to compromise antibacterial activity.
The D,D-transpeptidases have been historically referred to as penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) since these enzymes were routinely identified by covalent labeling with radioactive penicillin followed by gel electrophoresis1. PBPs belong to a super family of mechanistically and structurally related active-site serine enzymes that also comprise D,D-carboxypeptidases, endopeptidases, and most β-lactamases responsible for β-lactam resistance by drug detoxification3, 5. The acyl-enzymes formed by the acylation of the Ser residue of β-lactamases are rapidly hydrolyzed leading to turnover and drug detoxification. More recently, the family of β-lactam-interacting enzymes has been enriched by the detection of active-site cysteine L,D-transpeptidases that by-pass the D,D-transpeptidase activity of PBPs in β-lactam-resistant mutants of Enterococcus faecium and Escherichia coli 6, 7. These L,D-transpeptidases were also found to be the main peptidoglycan cross-linking enzymes in Clostridium difficile and in mycobacteria8. The L,D-transpeptidases are structurally unrelated to active-site Ser PBPs and cleave the L-Lys3-D-Ala4 or diaminopymelate3-D-Ala4 peptide bond of an acyl donor containing a tetrapeptide stem9, 10. In spite of this difference in substrate specificity, L,D-transpeptidases interact with β-lactams belonging to the carbapenem class11 (Fig. 1) that are currently being evaluated for the treatment of tuberculosis12 and of pulmonary infections due to Mycobacterium abscessus in cystic fibrosis patients13. The L,D-transpeptidases are also acylated by β-lactams belonging to the cephalosporin and penam classes but this does not lead to target inactivation and antibacterial activity since the corresponding adducts are prone to hydrolysis14.
Due to the strain of the four-membered ring of β-lactams, the acylation reaction is considered as irreversible in the sense that re-sealing of the scissile amide bond of the β-lactam ring is not thought to occur at any significant rate15, 16. In this study, we have critically evaluated this postulate by studying the acylation of the L,D-transpeptidase Ldtfm from E. faecium by nitrocefin, a chromogenic cephalosporin. We show that this drug-enzyme combination displays high acylation and low hydrolysis rates leading to acyl-enzyme accumulation. This offered the possibility to assay for recyclization of the β-lactam ring by two approaches based on the use of a competing β-lactam or a competing enzyme. We provide evidence that recyclization of the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin in the acyl-enzyme regenerates the native drug that can freely diffuse out of the Ldtfm active site. These data indicate that the irreversible nature of the acylation reaction is not exclusively driven by the strain of the four-membered ring of β-lactams.
Results
Modification of the absorbance spectrum of nitrocefin following acylation of the L,D-transpeptidase Ldtfm
Hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin (50 µM) by the β-lactamase BlaC (1 µM) in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) produced the expected large increase in the absorbance at 486 nm (Fig. 2A). Under these conditions, the variation in the molar extinction coefficient (Δε) was 15,200 M−1 cm−1 (1,400 M−1 cm−1 versus 16,600 M−1 cm−1 for native and hydrolyzed nitrocefin, respectively). Incubation of Ldtfm (22 µM) with increasing concentrations of nitrocefin (0 to 56 µM) also led to an increase of the absorbance at 486 nm (Fig. 2B). The increase in the absorbance was linear until the concentration of nitrocefin exceeded that of the enzyme. This result indicates that the increase in the absorbance at 486 nm is due to the rupture of the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin upon acylation of the catalytic Cys residue of Ldtfm. In agreement, a covalent adduct was detected by mass spectrometry (Fig. 2C). The spectra of nitrocefin hydrolyzed by BlaC and of nitrocefin linked to Ldtfm in the acyl-enzyme were similar with two minor differences. Nitrocefin in the acyl-enzyme absorbed less than hydrolyzed nitrocefin (ε = 9,900 M−1 cm−1 versus 16,600 M−1 cm−1 at 486 nm, respectively). A minor red shift might occur in the absorbance maximum (λmax of 501 nm versus 486 nm, respectively). Thus, nitrocefin provides a sensitive assay to titrate the active site of Ldtfm.
Kinetic analyses of Ldtfm acylation by nitrocefin
Stopped-flow kinetics were performed to assess the efficacy of acylation of Ldtfm (11 µM) by nitrocefin (25, 50, 75, and 100 µM; Fig. 3A). The concentration of the acyl-enzyme (EI*) was determined based on the difference in the molar extinction coefficient (Δε486 nm = 8,500 M−1 cm−1) between native nitrocefin (ε = 1,400 M−1 cm−1) and nitrocefin in the acyl-enzyme (ε = 9,900 M−1 cm−1) (Fig. 2). To determine the value of k obs, as defined in equation 1 (Fig. 3), exponential rise to maximum was fitted to kinetic data. Full acylation of Ldtfm was observed at all the concentrations of nitrocefin that were tested and the value of k obs increased linearly with the concentration of nitrocefin (Fig. 3B). The slope provided an estimate of the efficacy of the acylation reaction (24,000 ± 700 M−1 s−1).
Hydrolysis of the acylenzyme
Incubation of nitrocefin (50 µM) with various concentrations of Ldtfm (0 to 22 µM) for an extended time period (14 hours) revealed an increase in the absorbance at 486 nm (Fig. 3C), which was proportional to the enzyme concentration (Fig. 3D). The concentration of hydrolyzed nitrocefin was determined using the value of Δε of 15,200 M−1 cm−1 obtained above with BlaC at 486 nm (Fig. 2). In these experiments, data were acquired between 1 min and 14 hours due to the lag time required to charge an automatic sample changer. Thus, Ldtfm was fully acylated at the beginning of the recording of the data (see above, Fig. 3A). The initial absorbance was subtracted to generate the kinetics presented in Fig. 3C. In these conditions, the increase in absorbance was due to enzyme turnover resulting in nitrocefin hydrolysis (Scheme 1 in Fig. 3). The observed turnover (5.29 ± 0.05 × 10−5 s−1) corresponds to the value of the kinetic parameter k 3 since the bulk of Ldtfm is acylated under these conditions (Fig. 3A). The value of k 3 implies a half-life of 218 min for the acyl-enzyme. The high efficacy of acylation coupled to the low value of k 3 accounts for the steady-state presence of EN* as the main form of Ldtfm in the presence of nitrocefin.
Competitive acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin and the carbapenem imipenem
Ldtfm (22 µM) was simultaneously exposed to nitrocefin (50 µM) and imipenem (64 µM) (Fig. 4A). The kinetics without imipenem was determined as a control. Imipenem had little impact on the initial rate of acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin, as determined by the increase in the absorbance at 486 nm. Thus, imipenem did not significantly interfere with acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin. Full acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin was observed in ca. 3 s but a longer incubation in the presence of imipenem resulted in a decrease in the absorbance at 486 nm (Fig. 4B). This decrease could not be attributed to the hydrolysis of the acyl-enzyme that would result in an increase rather than a decrease in the absorbance of 486 nm. At this wavelength, reactions involving hydrolysis of imipenem or acylation of Ldtfm by this drug had no impact on the absorbance (data not shown). We therefore concluded that native nitrocefin and nitrocefin bound to the catalytic Cys of Ldtfm in the acyl-enzyme were in equilibrium and that imipenem displaced this equilibrium in favor of the native drug. In the competing acylation step, Ldtfm was initially fully acylated by nitrocefin but imipenem gradually replaced nitrocefin in the enzyme active site since the acylation reaction was irreversible with imipenem but reversible with nitrocefin (Scheme 2). In the control experiment without imipenem, slow hydrolysis of nitrocefin was observed as expected from the kinetics displayed in Fig. 3C.
In the above experiments involving incubation of Ldtfm with imipenem and nitrocefin, the recyclization reaction generates the native form of Ldtfm, which is expected to be competitively acylated by imipenem and nitrocefin. Recyclization followed by acylation with nitrocefin contributes to a futile cycle with no net impact on the concentration of nitrocefin. This implies that the net rate of nitrocefin recyclization should increase with the concentration of the competing imipenem. Testing recyclization of nitrocefin (50 µM) in the presence of various concentrations of imipenem (64, 128, 256, and 512 µM) revealed the expected increase in the net rate of nitrocefin recyclization (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Competitive acylation of two forms of Ldtfm by nitrocefin
Since the reversibility of the acylation reaction was unprecedented for any β-lactam, our next objective was to demonstrate the reversibility of the acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin using a second independent method. We surmise that resealing of the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin should regenerate the native form of the drug that could leave the Ldtfm active site, diffuse in the medium, and competitively acylate another molecule of Ldtfm (Fig. 5A). To bring these reactions to light, we prepared uniformly13C- and15N-labeled Ldtfm. The unlabeled and labeled forms of Ldtfm, which were readily identified by mass spectrometry, were expected to have similar catalytic properties since they only differ by their isotopic content. To test for the reversibility of the acylation reaction, a limiting amount of nitrocefin (1.5 nmole) was first incubated with labeled Ldtfm (2.2 nmole) in 100 µl of 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). The extent of acylation (ca. 82%) indicated that the bulk of nitrocefin had reacted with Ldtfm (Fig. 5B). Then, unlabeled Ldtfm (2.2 nmole) was added and the partition of nitrocefin between the two forms of Ldtfm was determined by mass spectrometry. After 600 s of incubation an equilibrium was reached and 40% of the labeled and unlabeled forms of Ldtfm were acylated by nitrocefin. This result indicates that the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin was resealed within the active site of labeled Ldtfm since this was the only source of native nitrocefin for acylation of unlabeled Ldtfm.
Antibacterial activity of nitrocefin and imipenem resulting from inhibition of Ldtfm
We have previously reported activation of the L,D-transpeptidase pathway in a mutant of Enterococcus faecium (M512), which was selected in laboratory conditions on media containing increasing concentrations of ampicillin11. Depending upon the growth conditions, the peptidoglycan of the mutant M512 is exclusively cross-linked by the PBPs or by Ldtfm. In the presence of ampicillin (32 µg/ml), the D,D-transpeptidase activity of all PBPs produced by the mutant M512 is inhibited and Ldtfm is the only functional transpeptidase. Antibiotic susceptibility testing in media containing ampicillin (32 µg/ml) was therefore used to assay for inhibition of Ldtfm by nitrocefin. The broth microdilution assay revealed a 64-fold difference between the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of nitrocefin (4 µg/ml) and that of imipenem (0.0625 µg/ml). Thus, nitrocefin was less active than imipenem in spite of a higher rate of acylation of Ldtfm.
Discussion
In conclusion, we provide evidence for reversible acylation of the L,D-transpeptidase Ldtfm by nitrocefin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that reversible acylation is documented for a β-lactam antibiotic. This conclusion is based on two independent approaches. First, we show that the deacylation (recyclization) reaction regenerates the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin based on spectrophotometry, a technique that provided access to kinetic evaluation (Fig. 3). Second, we show that the deacylation reaction regenerates a native molecule of nitrocefin that eventually leaves the Ldtfm active site and acylates another enzyme molecule. This was established by using two preparations of Ldtfm that only differ by their isotopic content.
The irreversibility of the acylation step is generally attributed to the strain of the β-lactam ring although this has not yet been explored by computational investigations15. In agreement, compounds containing a γ-lactam ring reversibly react with nucleophilic serine enzymes. For example, recyclization has been extensively documented for the 5-membered cyclic urea group of avibactam16, 17, a β-lactamase inhibitor recently approved for clinical use in combination with the β-lactam ceftazidime18.
Our experimental design provides direct evidence that acylation is reversible for certain β-lactams (e.g. nitrocefin) but not for others (e.g. imipenem) since simultaneous incubation of Ldtfm with the two drugs led to the rapid formation of the Ldtfm-nitrocefin acyl-enzyme, which was then slowly replaced by the Ldtfm-imipenem acyl-enzyme. The basis for this difference remains unknown, but it is tempting to speculate that it involves the fate of the negative charge that develops on the β-lactam nitrogen upon rupture of the β-lactam ring (Fig. 1). The determination of the NMR structure of the ertapenem-Ldtfm acyl-enzyme has shown that the nitrogen atom of this carbapenem is protonated19. In the case of nitrocefin, protonation of the nitrogen atom is not expected to be required for stabilization of the acyl-enzyme since the negative charge is delocalized by the very strong electron withdrawing power of the dinitrophenyl substituent. This could account for reversible acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin but not by imipenem. Of note, resealing of the β-lactam ring is thermodynamically more favorable for L,D-transpeptidases than for classical PBPs since the thioester formed with cysteine-containing L,D-transpeptidases has a much higher potential than the corresponding ester formed with serine-containing β-lactamases and D,D-transpeptidases.
The efficacy of acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin (24,000 ± 700 M−1 s−1) (Fig. 3) was higher than that observed for any carbapenem-L,D-transpeptidase combination in previous studies14, 20–22. The efficacy of acylation of Ldtfm was found to be lower for cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone (50 ± 5 M−1 s−1) and cephalotin (8.3 ± 3.3 M−1 s−1) or penams such as ampicillin (8.7 ± 0.3 M−1 s−1)14. Since cephalotin and nitrocefin are two cephalosporins harboring the same side-chain at positionC7 (Fig. 1), the 2,900-fold difference in the acylation efficacy observed between the two drugs is due to the side-chain at position C3. The NMR structure of Ldtfm acylated by ertapenem indicates that there is little interaction, if any, between the side-chain at C3 and the enzyme23. In agreement, the efficacy of acylation mainly varies with the β-lactam class (carbapenem, cephalosporin, or penam), with a lesser impact originating from differences in their side-chains14, 21. These observations suggest that the high efficacy of acylation of Ldtfm by nitrocefin depends upon an effect of the side-chain on the reactivity of the β-lactam ring, as opposed to a direct interaction of the side-chain with the enzyme. This effect of the side-chain may involve the polarization of the carbon-nitrogen bond of the β-lactam ring of nitrocefin.
In spite of the unexpected high efficacy of acylation, the antibacterial activity of nitrocefin was less than that of imipenem. This observation suggests that the irreversibility of the acylation reaction, rather than its efficacy, is important for antibacterial activity. Optimum antibacterial activity may therefore involve an additional reaction step that follows the acylation and prevents its reversibility. For carbapenems, this additional reaction step could be the protonation of the nitrogen of the β-lactam ring, as discussed above23. For most cephalosporins, irreversibility could result from the loss of a leaving group in the C3 side-chain (Fig. 1)14, 22. Of note, other types of rearrangements are instrumental to the inhibition of β-lactamases by clavulanate5.
In summary, our study shows that the strain of the β-lactam ring is not sufficient to prevent recyclization following acylation of Ldtfm. Drug efficacy may in part rely on a secondary modification of the drug in the active site to prevent the reversibility of the acylation step. These observations illustrate the complexity of parameters that should be taken into account for the optimization of β-lactams.
Methods
Materials
Stock solutions (25 mg/ml) of nitrocefin (Calbiochem) were prepared in 100% DMSO and stored at −20 °C. Dilutions were extemporaneously prepared in water. Stock solutions of imipenem (provided by Merck) were prepared extemporaneously in water.
Protein purification
The plasmid constructs for production of the catalytic domain of Ldtfm (residues 341 to 466) and of a soluble fragment of the β-lactamase BlaC from M. tuberculosis (residues 39 to 306) have been previously described14, 24. BlaC and Ldtfm were produced in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells grown in brain heart infusion broth (BHI)14, 24. Labeling of Ldtfm was obtained in M9 minimal medium containing 13C glucose and 15N NH4Cl14. Ldtfm and BlaC were purified from clarified lysates by affinity and size-exclusion chromatography in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.4) and in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 300 mM NaCl, respectively24, 25. The purified enzymes were concentrated by ultrafiltration (Amicon Ultra-4 centrifugal filter devices, Millipore) and stored at −65 °C in the same buffers.
Spectrophotometry
All kinetics were performed at 20 °C in 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.0) either in a spectrophotometer (Cary 100; Varian SA) coupled to a stopped-flow apparatus (RX-2000; Applied Photophysics) or in a spectrophotometer (Cary 300) equipped with an automatic sample changer (Varian SA).
Mass spectrometry
The formation of Ldtfm-β-lactam adducts was tested by incubating Ldtfm with β-lactams at 20 °C in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). Five µl of acetonitrile and 1 µl of 1% formic acid were extemporaneously added, and the reaction mixture was directly injected into the mass spectrometer (Qstar Pulsar I; Applied Biosystem) at a flow rate of 0.05 ml/min (acetonitrile, 50%, water, 49.5%, and formic acid, 0.5%; per volume). Spectra were acquired in the positive mode, as previously described11.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The microdilution assay was performed in BHI broth containing 32 µg/ml of ampicillin (Euromedex) in 96-well plates. Each well (200 µl) was inoculated with overnight cultures to obtain 5 × 105 cfu/ml. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and the minimal inhibitory concentration was defined as the minimal concentration that prevented visible growth.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank L. Dubost and A. Marie for technical assistance in the collection of mass spectra. This work was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM grant number ECO20160736080 to ZE), the French National Research Agency (grant CARBATUB, ANR-2011-BSV5-024-04), and by the European Commission Seventh Framework Program (ORCHID project No. 261378).
Author Contributions
Z.E. performed the experiments. J-.E.H. and M.A. designed the study. All authors participated to data analysis and to the writing of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09341-8
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Michel Arthur, Email: michel.arthur@crc.jussieu.fr.
Jean-Emmanuel Hugonnet, Email: Jean-emmanuel.hugonnet@crc.jussieu.fr.
References
- 1.Zapun A, Contreras-Martel C, Vernet T. Penicillin-binding proteins and beta-lactam resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008;32:361–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Typas A, Banzhaf M, Gross CA, Vollmer W. From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;10:123–136. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tipper DJ, Strominger JL. Mechanism of action of penicillins: a proposal based on their structural similarity to acyl-D-alanyl-D-alanine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1965;54:1133–1141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.4.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sauvage E, Kerff F, Terrak M, Ayala JA, Charlier P. The penicillin-binding proteins: structure and role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008;32:234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Drawz SM, Bonomo RA. Three decades of beta-lactamase inhibitors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010;23:160–201. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00037-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mainardi JL, et al. Balance between two transpeptidation mechanisms determines the expression of beta-lactam resistance in Enterococcus faecium. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:35801–35807. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204319200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hugonnet, J. E. et al. Factors essential for L,D-transpeptidase-mediated peptidoglycan cross-linking and beta-lactam resistance in Escherichia coli. Elife5 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Lavollay M, et al. The peptidoglycan of Mycobacterium abscessus is predominantly cross-linked by L,D-transpeptidases. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:778–782. doi: 10.1128/JB.00606-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mainardi JL, et al. A novel peptidoglycan cross-linking enzyme for a beta-lactam-resistant transpeptidation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:38146–38152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507384200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Biarrotte-Sorin S, et al. Crystal structure of a novel beta-lactam-insensitive peptidoglycan transpeptidase. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;359:533–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mainardi JL, et al. Unexpected inhibition of peptidoglycan LD-transpeptidase from Enterococcus faecium by the beta-lactam imipenem. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:30414–30422. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704286200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Diacon AH, et al. beta-lactams against tuberculosis-new trick for an old dog? N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:393–394. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1513236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lefebvre, A. L. et al. Inhibition of the beta-lactamase BlaMab by avibactam improves the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of imipenem against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Triboulet S, et al. Kinetic features of L,D-transpeptidase inactivation critical for beta-lactam antibacterial activity. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Choi H, Paton RS, Park H, Schofield CJ. Investigations on recyclisation and hydrolysis in avibactam mediated serine beta-lactamase inhibition. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14:4116–4128. doi: 10.1039/C6OB00353B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang DY, Abboud MI, Markoulides MS, Brem J, Schofield CJ. The road to avibactam: the first clinically useful non-beta-lactam working somewhat like a beta-lactam. Future Med. Chem. 2016;8:1063–1084. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2016-0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ehmann DE, et al. Avibactam is a covalent, reversible, non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:11663–11668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205073109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Papp-Wallace KM, Bonomo RA. New beta-lactamase inhibitors in the clinic. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am. 2016;30:441–464. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lecoq, L. et al. Structure of Enterococcus faeciuml,d-transpeptidase acylated by ertapenem provides insight into the inactivation mechanism. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 1140–1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Cordillot M, et al. In vitro cross-linking of Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptidoglycan by L,D-transpeptidases and inactivation of these enzymes by carbapenems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5940–5945. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01663-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dubée V, et al. Kinetic Analysis of Enterococcus faecium L,D-transpeptidase Inactivation by carbapenems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56:3409–3412. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06398-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dubee V, et al. Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis L,D-transpeptidase LdtMt1 by carbapenems and cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4189–4195. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00665-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lecoq L, et al. Structure of Enterococcus faecium L,D-transpeptidase acylated by ertapenem provides insight into the inactivation mechanism. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013;8:1140–1146. doi: 10.1021/cb4001603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Soroka D, et al. Characterization of broad-spectrum Mycobacterium abscessus class A beta-lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014;69:691–696. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Triboulet S, et al. Inactivation kinetics of a new target of beta-lactam antibiotics. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:22777–22784. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.239988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bhattacharjee N, Field MJ, Simorre JP, Arthur M, Bougault CM. Hybrid potential simulation of the acylation of Enterococcus faecium L,D-transpeptidase by carbapenems. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2016;120:4767–4781. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.