Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1992 Sep;11(9):3449–3455. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05424.x

Binding of the IS903 transposase to its inverted repeat in vitro.

K M Derbyshire 1, N D Grindley 1
PMCID: PMC556880  PMID: 1324175

Abstract

We have purified the transposase of IS903 in three different ways. We find that transposase expressed as a fusion protein with either glutathione-S-transferase or maltose-binding protein is soluble and can be purified rapidly using affinity chromatography. The third purification requires extracting the native transposase from an insoluble pellet using an alkaline pH buffer. All three proteins bind specifically to the ends of IS903 and give identical patterns of protection when challenged with DNase I. We have used the more stable fusion proteins to examine transposase--DNA interactions in vitro. Methylation interference experiments have identified critical bases for transposase binding; methylated purines that inhibit binding all lie within the inner part of the 18 bp inverted repeat (bp 7-16). Moreover, the positions and identities of these purines suggest that the transposase interacts with base pairs in adjacent major and minor grooves. Binding assays with mutant inverted repeats confirm that transposase binding is sensitive to sequence changes only within this inner region. We propose that the transposase binding site is limited to this domain of the inverted repeat. These data are consistent with our previous analysis of the behaviour of mutant ends in vivo, from which we postulated that the inverted repeat was composed of two functional domains; an inner binding domain (bp 6-18), which included a region of minor groove interactions, and an outer domain that was involved in a step subsequent to transposase binding.

Full text

PDF
3449

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amemura J., Ichikawa H., Ohtsubo E. Tn3 transposition immunity is conferred by the transposase-binding domain in the terminal inverted-repeat sequence of Tn3. Gene. 1990 Mar 30;88(1):21–24. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90055-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arciszewska L. K., Craig N. L. Interaction of the Tn7-encoded transposition protein TnsB with the ends of the transposon. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Sep 25;19(18):5021–5029. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.18.5021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bedouelle H., Duplay P. Production in Escherichia coli and one-step purification of bifunctional hybrid proteins which bind maltose. Export of the Klenow polymerase into the periplasmic space. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Feb 1;171(3):541–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craigie R., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):387–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Derbyshire K. M., Hwang L., Grindley N. D. Genetic analysis of the interaction of the insertion sequence IS903 transposase with its terminal inverted repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(22):8049–8053. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.8049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Derbyshire K. M., Kramer M., Grindley N. D. Role of instability in the cis action of the insertion sequence IS903 transposase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(11):4048–4052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falvey E., Grindley N. D. Contacts between gamma delta resolvase and the gamma delta res site. EMBO J. 1987 Mar;6(3):815–821. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04824.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frankel S., Sohn R., Leinwand L. The use of sarkosyl in generating soluble protein after bacterial expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1192–1196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Germino J., Bastia D. Rapid purification of a cloned gene product by genetic fusion and site-specific proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4692–4696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glasgow A. C., Bruist M. F., Simon M. I. DNA-binding properties of the Hin recombinase. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jun 15;264(17):10072–10082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grindley N. D., Joyce C. M. Analysis of the structure and function of the kanamycin-resistance transposon Tn903. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1981;45(Pt 1):125–133. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1981.045.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harrison S. C. A structural taxonomy of DNA-binding domains. Nature. 1991 Oct 24;353(6346):715–719. doi: 10.1038/353715a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huisman O., Errada P. R., Signon L., Kleckner N. Mutational analysis of IS10's outside end. EMBO J. 1989 Jul;8(7):2101–2109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03619.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kans J. A., Casadaban M. J. Nucleotide sequences required for Tn3 transposition immunity. J Bacteriol. 1989 Apr;171(4):1904–1914. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.4.1904-1914.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim J., Zwieb C., Wu C., Adhya S. Bending of DNA by gene-regulatory proteins: construction and use of a DNA bending vector. Gene. 1989 Dec 21;85(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90459-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kissinger C. R., Liu B. S., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90453-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuo C. F., Zou A. H., Jayaram M., Getzoff E., Harshey R. DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1585–1591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07679.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lavoie B. D., Chan B. S., Allison R. G., Chaconas G. Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3051–3059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee D. K., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G. Interaction of TFIID in the minor groove of the TATA element. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90300-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu-Johnson H. N., Gartenberg M. R., Crothers D. M. The DNA binding domain and bending angle of E. coli CAP protein. Cell. 1986 Dec 26;47(6):995–1005. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90814-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mizuuchi M., Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. DNase protection analysis of the stable synaptic complexes involved in Mu transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):9031–9035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nagai K., Thøgersen H. C. Generation of beta-globin by sequence-specific proteolysis of a hybrid protein produced in Escherichia coli. 1984 Jun 28-Jul 4Nature. 309(5971):810–812. doi: 10.1038/309810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rimphanitchayakit V., Hatfull G. F., Grindley N. D. The 43 residue DNA binding domain of gamma delta resolvase binds adjacent major and minor grooves of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Feb 11;17(3):1035–1050. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.3.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Seeman N. C., Rosenberg J. M., Rich A. Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):804–808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Siebenlist U., Gilbert W. Contacts between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and an early promoter of phage T7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):122–126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sluka J. P., Horvath S. J., Bruist M. F., Simon M. I., Dervan P. B. Synthesis of a sequence-specific DNA-cleaving peptide. Science. 1987 Nov 20;238(4830):1129–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.3120311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith G. E., Summers M. D., Fraser M. J. Production of human beta interferon in insect cells infected with a baculovirus expression vector. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Dec;3(12):2156–2165. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.12.2156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Starr D. B., Hawley D. K. TFIID binds in the minor groove of the TATA box. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90299-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Studier F. W., Rosenberg A. H., Dunn J. J., Dubendorff J. W. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Surette M. G., Harkness T., Chaconas G. Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations. J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 15;266(5):3118–3124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Thompson J. F., Landy A. Empirical estimation of protein-induced DNA bending angles: applications to lambda site-specific recombination complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9687–9705. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weinert T. A., Derbyshire K. M., Hughson F. M., Grindley N. D. Replicative and conservative transpositional recombination of insertion sequences. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:251–260. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wiater L. A., Grindley N. D. Uncoupling of transpositional immunity from gamma delta transposition by a mutation at the end of gamma delta. J Bacteriol. 1990 Sep;172(9):4959–4963. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.9.4959-4963.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang C. C., Nash H. A. The interaction of E. coli IHF protein with its specific binding sites. Cell. 1989 Jun 2;57(5):869–880. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90801-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Young J. F., Desselberger U., Palese P., Ferguson B., Shatzman A. R., Rosenberg M. Efficient expression of influenza virus NS1 nonstructural proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(19):6105–6109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.19.6105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zerbib D., Prentki P., Gamas P., Freund E., Galas D. J., Chandler M. Functional organization of the ends of IS1: specific binding site for an IS 1-encoded protein. Mol Microbiol. 1990 Sep;4(9):1477–1486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. di Guan C., Li P., Riggs P. D., Inouye H. Vectors that facilitate the expression and purification of foreign peptides in Escherichia coli by fusion to maltose-binding protein. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):21–30. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES