Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;6(7):1–10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix040

Table 3:

Shotgun metagenomic read alignment statistics

Read alignment
Sample Total reads ratea (%)
Control mix 1 replicate A 18 816 478 97.05
Control mix 1 replicate C 17 883 449 97.11
Control mix 2 replicate A 20 343 317 97.18
Control mix 1 replicate C 18 138 322 97.91
T1 D1 replicate A 20 027 063 88.15
T1 D1 replicate B 21 175 617 90.22
T2 D1 replicate A 18 173 778 90.12
T2 D1 replicate B 21 705 055 91.02
T2 D3 replicate A 21 282 134 97.12
T2 D3 replicate B 21 112 818 96.84
Y1 D1 replicate A 20 196 267 96.04
Y1 D1 replicate B 20 404 693 96.39
Y2 D1 replicate A 18 384 104 93.13
Y2 D1 replicate B 18 960 301 92.61
Y2 D3 replicate A 20 731 661 96.66
Y2 D3 replicate B 19 327 663 96.75
Y3 D1 replicate A 19 843 426 94.48
Y3 D1 replicate B 21 559 192 94.29
Y3 D3 replicate A 19 533 468 96.69
Y3 D3 replicate B 19 258 370 95.77

aSequencing reads from each sample (pre-filtered to remove grapevine matches) were aligned against the wine reference consortium (Table S3).