Abstract
Purpose
Extracellular high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) acts as a damage associated molecular pattern molecule through the Toll-like receptor to promote autoreactive B cell activation, which may be involved in the pathogenesis of Sjӧgren’s syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subconjunctival administration of anti-HMGB1 on dry eye in a mouse model of Sjӧgren’s syndrome.
Methods
Ten weeks-old NOD.B10.H2b mice were subconjunctivally injected with 0.02 to 2 μg of anti-HMGB1 antibodies or PBS twice a week for two consecutive weeks. Tear volume and corneal staining scores were measured and compared between before- and after-treatment. Goblet cell density was counted in PAS stained forniceal conjunctiva and inflammatory foci score (>50 cells/focus) was measured in extraorbital glands. Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the changes in BrdU+ cells, IL-17-, IL-10-, or IFNγ-secreting cells, functional B cells, and IL-22 secreting innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) in cervical lymph nodes. The level of IL-22 in intraorbital glands was measured by ELISA.
Results
Injection of 2 μg or 0.02 μg anti-HMGB1 attenuated corneal epithelial erosions and increased tear secretion (p<0.05). Goblet cell density was increased in 0.2 μg and 2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated-mice with marginal significance. The inflammatory foci score, and the number of BrdU+ cells, IL-17-, IL-10-, IFNγ-secreting cells, and functional B cells did not significantly change following anti-HMGB1 treatment. Surprisingly, the percentage of ILC3s was significantly increased in the draining lymph nodes (p<0.05), and the expression of IL-22 was significantly increased in the intraorbital glands (p<0.05) after administration of 2 μg anti-HMGB1.
Conclusion
This study shows that subconjunctival administration of anti-HMGB1 attenuates clinical manifestations of dry eye. The improvement of dry eye may involve an increase of ILC3s, rather than modulation of B or plasma cells, as shown using a mouse model of Sjӧgren’s syndrome.
Introduction
Sjӧgren’s syndrome represents one of the most devastating examples of autoimmune dry eye, which is involved in multiple pathological mechanisms and causes severe discomfort and visual disturbance. Many studies have shown the importance of type I interferon secreted by plasmacytoid dendritic cells, B cell responses, extracellular high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and IL-17 pathways in Sjӧgren’s syndrome [1–3]. Current animal studies show that NOD.B10.H2b mice are an excellent model of primary Sjӧgren’s syndrome, and B cells, plasma cells, or T helper 17 (Th17) cells are involved in the important pathogenic mechanisms in this mouse model [4–6].
HMGB1 is a dual-function protein that has specific roles both inside and outside cells (Fig 1). HMGB1 is one of the most abundant non-histone nuclear proteins that contributes to chromatin stabilization, and contains two folded helical DNA-binding motifs, called A and B boxes. HMGB1 has three conserved redox-sensitive cysteines (C23, C45, C106), two located at positions 23 and 45 in the A box and one at position 106 in the B box. Modification of these cysteines determines the bioactivity of extracellular HMGB1 [7]. Extracellular HMGB1, which is passively released from necrotic cells or actively secreted by macrophages and dendritic cells, is a crucial cytokine that mediates the response to infection, injury, and inflammation, including autoimmune diseases such as Sjӧgren’s syndrome [2, 3, 8]. Necrosis- and pyroptosis-induced extracellular HMGB1 is usually in a disulfide-bonded form (between cysteine 23 and cysteine 45) that acts as a damage associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecule through TLR 4, TLR 2, RAGE-TLR9, or IL-1R to promote dendritic cell maturation and autoreactive B cell activation. Extracellular HMGB1, in which all cysteines are reduced, binds to CXCL12 and acts through CXCR4 to cause cellular chemotaxis (Fig 1) [9–12]. In addition, extracellular HMGB1 is reported to be involved in the activation of Th17 cells during inflammatory disease [13], and may also be involved in IL-17 or IL-22 secretion in innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). ILCs are known to coordinate or limit immune responses during autoimmune disease, depending on environmental factors [14]. Conversely, apoptosis-induced extracellular HMGB1, in which all cysteines are oxidized, or cysteine 106 is oxidized, does not exhibit pro-inflammatory or chemotactic activities [7].
Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) have emerged as a new type of immune cell with important functions in innate and adaptive immunity [14, 15]. Like natural killer (NK) cells, ILCs belong to the lymphoid lineage; however, unlike T and B cells, they lack antigen-receptors (T cell receptor or B cell receptor). ILCs are found in various tissues including the mucosa, lymphoid tissue, liver, skin, and fat. Group 1 ILCs consist of conventional NK cells and ILCs that secrete T helper (Th) 1-type cytokine IFNγ and express the transcription factor T-bet. Group 2 ILCs produce Th2-type cytokines IL-4, IL-5, or IL-13, and express the transcription factors ROR-α, Gata3, and T cell factor (TCF)-1. Group 3 ILCs include fetal lymphoid tissue-inducer (LTi) cells, and adult ILCs that either express or lack the natural cytotoxicity receptor (NCR, NKp46) (NCR+ILC3s and NCR-ILC3s, respectively). ILC3s produce the Th17-type cytokine, IL-17 or IL-22, and express the transcription factor ROR-γt. The function of ILCs in various tissues is described in Table 1, but it is not yet fully understood. In the intestine, ILC3s are known to promote epithelial wound healing and maintain epithelial barrier function.
Table 1. Functional characteristics of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs).
Type | ILC1 | ILC2 | ILC3 |
---|---|---|---|
Cells | NK, ILC1 | ILC2 | LTi, NCR+ILC3, NCR-ILC3 |
Transcription factor | T-bet | ROR-α, Gata3, TCF-1 | ROR-γt |
Tissue signal | IL-12, IL-15, IL-18 | IL-25, IL-33, TSLP | IL-1β, IL-23 |
Effector cytokine | IFNγ | IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 | IL-17, IL-22, GM-CSF |
Function |
|
|
|
NK: natural killer; LTi: lymphoid tissue inducer; NCR: natural cytotoxicity receptor (NKp46 in mice, NKp44 in human); T cell factor -1: (TCF)-1; TSLP: thymic stromal lymphopoietin
In Sjӧgren’s syndrome, the conjunctival, corneal, and lacrimal epithelial cells are damaged during inflammation, and some of them may undergo necrosis to release extracellular HMGB1. We hypothesize that extracellular HMGB1 in Sjӧgren’s syndrome may trigger strong auto-inflammatory cycles by activating an adaptive immune response and may establish a continuous pathological condition. Therefore, we investigated whether early treatment with an anti-HMGB1 blocking antibody could (1) improve the clinical manifestations of dry eye, (2) decrease the responses of autoreactive B cells or Th17 cells, and (3) affect changes in ILC3s that might be involved in modification of epithelial wound healing in NOD.B10.H2b mice.
Materials and methods
Animals
All procedures used in this study strictly adhered to the ARVO statement regarding the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee at Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute (IACUC No. 13–0162). Bilateral treatment was justified by the fact that this procedure was not visually disabling and that breeding of NOD.B10.H2b mice was limited, according to ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and was approved by the Ethics Committee. NOD.B10.H2b mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All mice were bred in a specific pathogen-free environment and maintained at 22–24°C, relative humidity 55 ± 5%, with alternating 14/10 hour light/dark cycles (light-on 6 AM; light-off 8 PM) with free access to water and food at the mouse facility at the Biomedical Research Institute of Seoul National University Hospital. Overall health was monitored twice a week (weight and hair loss). Phenol red thread tests and corneal dye staining were performed following an intraperitoneal injection of zoletil (10 mg/kg) and xylazine (14 mg/kg), and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Euthanasia was performed using compressed CO2 gas, according to the American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition.
Mouse model of Sjӧgren’s syndrome
Ten week-old male NOD. B10.H2b mice were used as an autoimmune dry eye model, because NOD.B10.H2b mice serve as a model for studying primary Sjӧgren’s syndrome without development of diabetes [5, 6, 16, 17]. To investigate inhibitory effect of triggering by HMGB1 in early stage of inflammatory cascades, 10 week-old mice were chosen based on previous preliminary data. A time course of clinical manifestations and inflammatory changes in the draining lymph nodes and intraorbital glands was evaluated between 10 and 16 weeks in BALB/C (n = 28), B6 (n = 32) and NOD.B10.H2b mice (n = 34). Clinical dry eye and early inflammation was confirmed to have begun by 10 weeks (S1 Fig). For the current study, 24 male NOD. B10.H2b mice were divided into treatment (n = 18) and control groups (n = 6).
Anti-HMGB1 treatment
A chicken anti-HMGB1 polyclonal blocking antibody (product number: 326052233, SHINO-TEST Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan; 0.02, 0.2 and 2 μg/0.1 cc, n = 6 for each concentration) was injected subconjunctivally into both eyes twice a week for 2 weeks. A subconjunctival injection of the same volume of PBS containing 0.2 μg chicken Ig Y (Product Code: 326058471; SHINO-TEST Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) served as a control. Three mice died during the experiments (two 0.02 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice and one 0.2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mouse) probably because of anesthetic overdose. Thereafter, we reduced the anesthetic dose to 20 μl.
BrdU proliferation analysis
To evaluate proliferative changes in T and B cells, mice were given 0.8 mg/ml BrdU (BD Pharmingen™, San Diego, CA) in their drinking water for 10 days, and the water was changed every two days.
Phenol red thread test for tear volume measurement
To evaluate tear production, phenol red-impregnated cotton threads (FCI Ophthalmics, Pembrooke, MA, USA) were applied to the lateral canthus for 60 seconds, and wetting of the thread was measured in millimeters. This was performed under anesthesia with zoletil (10 mg/kg) and xylazine (14 mg/kg) (n = 10–12). Twenty-four mice were included in the phenol red thread test for 10–11 weeks, and 21 mice were included in the test for 12 weeks and in the final analysis after sacrifice.
Corneal dye staining
To evaluate the degree of corneal epithelial defects, one drop of 3% Lissamine Green B (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was administered to the inferior lateral conjunctival sac. This was convenient because there was no need for cobalt light excitation [18]. The corneal surface was observed (n = 10–12), and dye staining of the cornea was scored in a blinded assay as follows: a score of 0 indicated no punctuate staining; 1 indicated less than one third of the cornea was stained; 2 indicated two thirds or less was stained; and 3 indicated more than two thirds was stained. Twenty-four mice were included in the corneal dye staining test for 10–11 weeks, and 21 mice were included in the test for 12 weeks, and in the final analysis after sacrifice.
Periodic acid schiff (PAS) staining for identification of goblet cells
The whole eyeball including the superior and inferior forniceal conjunctiva was excised and fixed in formalin. Tissues were cut into 4-μm-thick sections through the superior and inferior conjunctival fornices, and subjected to PAS staining. The total number of PAS-stained cells in the superior and inferior fornices of each eye was counted by two observers in a blind study (n = 16–24). Cell counts were averaged to determine goblet cell density in each group.
Histopathology
The extraorbital glands were excised and fixed in formalin. Samples were cut into 4 μm sections and subjected to hematoxylin-eosin, CD3 (for T cells), or B220 staining (an isoform of CD45 and pan B cell maker). For CD3 and B220 immunohistochemical staining, rabbit anti-mouse CD3 (ab16669, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and rat anti-mouse B220 (ab64100, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) primary antibodies were used. Anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked antibody (#7074, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) and goat anti-rat IgG H&L (HRP) (ab97057, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) were used as secondary antibodies for CD3 and B220 staining, respectively. The total number of inflammatory foci was counted in the CD3-stained slides (n = 7–9). A score of 1 was given when the focus contained greater than 50 CD3+ T lymphocytes [19].
Flow cytometry
Draining cervical lymph nodes were minced between the frosted ends of two glass slides in RPMI media (WelGENE, Daegu, Korea) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin—streptomycin. Cell suspensions were collected and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies: CD3 (T cells), CD4 (T helper cells, monocytes and dendritic cells), CD8 (cytotoxic T cells, natural killer, and dendritic cells), CD19 (B cells and follicular dendritic cells), B220 (B cells), CD138 (plasma cells), Nkp46 (ILCs and natural killer cells), CD45 (all leukocytes). For IFNγ, IL-10, and IL-17A intracellular staining, cells were stimulated for 5 hours with 50 ng/ml phorbol myristate acetate and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in the presence of GolgiPlug (BD Pharmingen™, San Diego, CA). For IL-22 intracellular staining, cells were stimulated for 5 hours with 10 ng/ml IL-1β and 10 ng/ml IL-23 in the presence of GolgiStop (BD Pharmingen™, San Diego, CA). Non-specific staining was blocked using purified 2.4G2 Ab (BD Fc Block ™). Color conjugation combinations and gating strategies were as follows: (1) IFNγ, and IL-17A secreting cells; CD3-PerCP cy5.5 (eBioscience, 145-2C11), CD4-APC (eBioscience, GK1.5), CD8-PE cy7 (eBioscience, 53–6.7), B220-APC cy7 (eBioscience, RA3-6B2), IL-17A-PE (BD Pharmingen™, TC11-18H10), IFNγ-FITC (eBioscience, XMG1.2); (2) Plasma cells; CD3-PerCP cy5.5 (eBioscience, 145-2C11), B220-APC cy7 (eBioscience, RA3-6B2), CD138-APC (BD Pharmingen™, 281–2); (3) IL-10 secreting B cells; CD3-PE (eBioscience, 145-2C11), CD19-PerCP cy5.5 (eBioscience, eBio 1D3), B220-APC cy7 (eBioscience, RA3-6B2), IL-10-FITC (eBioscience, JES5-16E3); (4) ILC3s; CD3-PerCP cy5.5 (eBioscience, 145-2C11), B220-FITC (eBioscience, RA3-6B2), NKp46-APC (eBioscience, 29A1.4), CD45-APC cy7 (eBioscience, 30-F11), IL-22-PE (eBioscience, 1H8PWSR). Isotype controls were as follows: rat IgG2a,k for CD138-APC; rat IgG1,k for IL-17A-PE, IFNγ-FITC and IL-22-PE; rat IgG2b,k for IL-10-FITC.
Cells were assayed using a FACSCanto flow cytometer (BD BioSciences, Mountain View, CA). Data were analyzed using Flowjo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) (n = 4–6).
For BrdU (BD Pharmingen™, San Diego, CA) staining, a BrdU FITC cell cycle assay was performed (n = 4–6). During the acquisition preview, gates were adjusted in the FSC-A vs. SSC-A plot, and the DNA 7-AAD-A voltage was adjusted to place the mean of the singlet peak (G0/G1) at 50,000 on the histogram. In addition, cell cycle gates were adjusted as needed to encompass the G0/G1, S, and G2/M populations (S2 Fig).
To evaluate changes in ILC3s, cells were negatively gated with anti-CD3-PerCP and anti-B220-FITC antibodies, then positively gated with anti-CD45-APC cy7 and anti-IL-22–PE antibodies in the presence of anti-Nkp46-APC. Subpopulations of CD3-B220-CD45+Nkp46+IL-22hi ILC3 cells (NCR+ ILC3s) and CD3-B220-CD45+Nkp46-IL-22hi ILC3s cells (NCR- ILC3s) were subsequently gated (S2 Fig). Fold changes in ILC3 percentage compared to controls were measured (n = 4–6).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Blood (800 μl– 1 ml) was obtained from the heart at the time of sacrifice. Plasma was collected after centrifugation at 2,500 rpm for 10 minutes, and used to measure the concentration of mouse anti-SSA (Ro-60, Signosis Inc. Santa Clara, CA) using an ELISA kit (Number EA-5202) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Anti-SSA in the plasma was analyzed in PBS-treated mice (n = 6), in anti-HMGB1-treated mice (n = 12), and in the positive control provided with the kit (n = 2).
Intraorbital glands were minced into small pieces, and sonicated in PRO-PREP Protein Extraction Solution (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea) on ice. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 20 minutes, and assayed for IL-22 by ELISA, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Each sample was assayed twice (n = 8–12).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Software (GraphPad Prism, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for statistical tests. To compare means from more than two groups, data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. To compare means of two groups, data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. To compare changes in ocular staining or tear secretion over time (baseline vs. post-treatment), which can be observed in vivo in living animals, data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Results
First, we looked at the effect of anti-HMGB1 treatment on the clinical manifestations of dry eye in NOD.B10.H2b mice (Fig 2). The representative photos in panel C show the surface changes, and the ocular staining score was significantly decreased in 2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice over time, compared with the pre-treatment baseline level (Fig 2A and 2C; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, 10 weeks vs. 11 weeks, p = 0.0156; 10 weeks vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.0156). The score was also decreased in 0.02 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice compared to the pre-treatment baseline score (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, 10 weeks vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.0313). The phenol red thread test (Fig 2B) showed that tear secretion was significantly reduced over time in PBS-treated control mice compared to the baseline (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, 10 weeks vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.002). This was expected because of progression of the disease. On the other hand, tear secretion was significantly increased in 0.02 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, 10 weeks vs. 11 weeks, p = 0.0273; 10 weeks vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.0078) and in 2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, 10 weeks vs. 11 weeks, p = 0.0005; 10 weeks vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.0342) compared to the pre-treatment baseline. In 0.2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice, ocular staining tended to be diminished and tear secretion tended to be increased, although neither were statistically significant. Goblet cell density was increased in 0.2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0066 vs. PBS) and 2 μg anti-HMGB1-treated mice (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.057 vs. PBS; marginal significance) 2 weeks after treatment (Fig 3).
Next, we evaluated changes in immunologic responses in the extraorbital glands, plasma, and draining lymph nodes 2 weeks after treatment (Figs 4 and 5). The percentage and number of BrdU+CD3+ T and BrdU+B220+ B cells (S phase, S2 Fig) in the draining lymph nodes of treated mice were not significantly altered compared to that in controls (Fig 4A). For effector T cell responses, the percentage of Th17 cells (CD3+CD4+IL-17hi) and Tc17 cells (cytotoxic T cells that secrete IL-17; CD3+CD8+IL-17hi) did not show any significant changes (Fig 4B). IFNγ-secreting T cells (CD3+CD4+IFNγhi or CD3+CD8+IFNγhi) were not changed following treatment (Fig 4C). For functional B cell responses, no significant changes were found in the percentage of plasma cells (CD3-B220+CD138+ cells) or IL-10-secreting B regulatory cells (CD3-CD19+B220+IL-10hi) in the draining lymph nodes (Fig 5A and 5B). Levels of anti-SSA were not significantly decreased in the plasma (Fig 5C). The infiltrating focus of CD3+ T cells was very similar to that of B220+ B cells (S3 Fig). Inflammatory foci scores in the extraorbital glands were not different among the groups (Fig 5D).
ILC3s are known to be involved in epithelial wound healing via secretion of IL-22. Therefore, we investigated changes in ILC3s in the draining lymph nodes 2 weeks after treatment (Fig 6A and 6D). Fold changes in the percentage of ILC3s (NCR-ILC3s; CD3-B220-CD45+Nkp46-IL-22hi or NCR+ILC3s; CD3-B220-CD45+Nkp46+IL-22hi) were significantly increased compared to controls (Kruskal-Wallis test, PBS vs. 2 μg anti-HMGB1, p = 0.025). NCR-ILC3s (CD3-B220-CD45+Nkp46-IL-22hi) were also increased after 2 μg anti-HMGB1 treatment (Kruskal-Wallis test, PBS vs. 2 μg anti-HMGB1, p = 0.0142). IL-22 levels were significantly increased in the intraorbital glands after 2 μg anti-HMGB1 treatment (Kruskal-Wallis test, PBS vs. 2μg anti-HMGB1, p = 0.025, Fig 6B). There are three major populations of IL-22 secreting cells, namely Th22 cells, ILC3s, and γδ T cells. The percentage of CD3+IL-22hi cells was not different among the groups, suggesting that the increase in IL-22 secretion is not related to Th22 or γδ T cells, which express CD3 (Fig 6C).
Discussion
This study indicates that subconjunctival administration of anti-HMGB1 attenuates the clinical manifestations of dry eye. Furthermore, the data also suggest that the improvement in dry eye in NOD.B10.H2b mice may involve an increase in IL-22-secreting ILC3s, rather than modulation of B or plasma cells.
The specific mechanisms that initiate inflammation in Sjӧgren’s syndrome are not fully understood, but we considered that the responses of reactive B cells and plasma cells that secrete autoantibodies could be key to maintaining the pathological condition [1]. Mouse models have clearly demonstrated the role of B and plasma cells in this process [4, 5]. We focused on extracellular HMGB1 because we believe that the chronic epithelial cell damage to the cornea or lacrimal glands may trigger the cycle of inflammation by secreting danger signals, such as HMGB1. It is plausible to assume that extracellular HMGB1 acts as an inflammatory cytokine through TLR9 signaling on B cells in this mouse model of Sjӧgren’s syndrome. Considering that TLR9 expression is abundant on B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells [20], we proposed that anti-HMGB1 treatment would reduce the effector function of B cells in these mice. However, B cell proliferation and the proportion of plasma cells, as well as anti-SSA levels, were not changed in the draining lymph nodes. We did not try to administer anti-HMGB1 systemically owing to the high cost. One reason for the failure to observe B cell modulation could be that the subconjunctival injection of anti-HMGB1 did not reach the spleen, where autoreactive B cells reside, at a sufficient therapeutic level to affect already activated B or plasma cells in the draining lymph nodes. In addition, B cell proliferation and the proportion of plasma cells were not affected following subconjunctival anti-HMGB1 treatment in the spleen (unpublished data).
It is also possible that early treatment with anti-HMGB1 did not have a measurable effect on inflammation because the epithelial damage was not sufficiently severe to secrete enough extracellular HMGB1 and induce inflammation. In addition, HMGB1 can increase Th17 cells by upregulating IL-6 or IL-23 [21–23]. Our study showed that anti-HMGB1 treatment did not affect the function of Th17 cells or Tc17 cells. Taken together, locally administered extracellular HMGB1 did not have a significant effect on adaptive immunity associated inflammation in this mouse model. We did not investigate changes in Treg cells after anti-HMGB1 treatment; therefore, further evaluation will be required to explore immune modulation following anti-HMGB1 treatment in more depth.
Despite the fact that we did not observe modulation of the effector function of B cells, the clinical manifestations of dry eye were still improved in this model. An increase in goblet cell density could indicate a protective effect due to an increase in tear secretion and a recovery of epithelial homeostasis. We therefore investigated the effect of IL-22-secreting ILC3 cells on epithelial damage in the dry eye model. This is based on the fact that ILC3 cells may play a role in epithelial homeostasis and wound healing as well as having a role in immune modulation [24–28].
ILCs are found mainly in mucosal tissues, including the intestinal tract (ILC3 and ILC2), lungs (ILC2), skin (ILC2), and tissues associated with lymphoid structures (ILC2) [29]. Emerging evidence shows that ILCs may function to maintain immune tolerance, homeostasis, or to inversely induce a T cell response by presenting foreign antigens or by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines, depending on environmental cues and ILC subtype [14, 15, 28, 30, 31]. The circumstances that determine this bidirectional role of ILCs (immune regulation versus inflammation/autoimmunity) are still unclear. The protective function of ILC3 cells on epithelial homeostasis through IL-22 is well established in the gut, but their role in epithelial homeostasis in the eye has not been investigated. Under normal conditions, ILC3 distribution is scarce in the cervical lymph nodes (unpublished data), while inflammatory conditions, such as the mouse model for Sjӧgren’s syndrome (NOD.B10.H2b) or an experimental uveitis model, show a large number of ILC3 cells in the cervical lymph nodes (unpublished data). The increase in ILC3 cells in the draining lymph nodes and the increased IL-22 expression in the intraorbital glands after anti-HMGB1 treatment suggest a possible role for ILC3s in the improvement of dry eye in this model. Although we could not discriminate between changes in Th22 and changes in γδ T cells, the fact that the changes in CD3+IL-22hi cells, including both Th22 and γδ T cells, were not significant suggests that the increase in IL-22 may be caused mainly by ILC3s. Our study showed a higher distribution of NCR-ILC3s (Nkp46-) and an increase in NCR-ILC3s (Nkp46-) in the cervical lymph nodes compared to NCR+ILC3s (Nkp46+) following treatment. These lineage-negative NCR- ILC3s (CD3-B220-Nkp46- CD45+IL-22hi cells) are a subset of ILC3s known to effectively promote epithelial wound healing in the intestine [29, 32]. Our data suggest that NCR-ILC3s, rather than NCR+ILC3s, may function during dry eye.
Many cytokines show pleiotropic effects on cellular homeostasis depending on the concentration (lower or higher than normal endogenous levels). Extracellular HMGB1 also appears to have diverse effects on different cells, depending on the concentration or redox status of cysteine. Lower levels of endogenous HMGB1 may be required for optimal wound closure [33], while a higher level of HMGB1 acts as a pro-inflammatory cytokine and does not affect epithelial wound healing [12, 33]. HMGB1 with disulfide bonded-cysteine or reduced-cysteine exhibits inflammatory activities or chemotaxis, while HMGB1 with oxidized-cysteine exhibits tolerogenic activities [7, 34, 35]. In our autoimmune dry eye model, we believe that the level of extracellular HMGB1 is higher than endogenous levels, which then provokes inflammation. This could explain why blocking HMGB1 improves dry eye, although the exact redox status of cysteine is not known.
The present study had several limitations. First, the number of the animals was small owing to limited breeding. We were not able to directly reveal a plausible mechanism for how anti-HMGB1 treatment could cause an increase in ILC3. Given the fact that HMGB1 can interact with Treg cells or directly with conventional T cells and modulate them [36], there are several possible direct or indirect pathways through which HMGB1 could communicate with ILCs, which have not yet been discovered. This study was also unable to provide direct evidence of a correlation between the increase in ILC3s and clinical improvement. We did not perform adoptive transfer because of technical difficulties, since the number of ILCs was very small. Therefore, further studies to investigate the exact role of ILCs are warranted. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report an improvement in dry eye after anti-HMGB1 treatment and to propose a possible role for ILC3s in this mouse model.
In conclusion, subconjunctival administration of anti-HMGB1 improved the clinical manifestations of dry eye in NOD.B10.H2b mice, although the anti-HMGB1 treatment did not affect B or plasma cells.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
This work was kindly advised regarding the identification of ILC3s by Yong-Oon Ahn (Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea).
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from the Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund (Project No. 03-2012-0340 and Project No. 04-2013-0510; http://bri.snuh.org). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Ambrosi A, Wahren-Herlenius M. Update on the immunobiology of Sjӧgren's syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27(5):468–475. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dupire G, Nicaise C, Gangji V, Soyfoo MS. Increased serum levels of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in primary Sjӧgren's syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(2):120–123. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2011.633099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ek M, Popovic K, Harris HE, Naucler CS, Wahren-Herlenius M. Increased extracellular levels of the novel proinflammatory cytokine high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 in minor salivary glands of patients with Sjӧgren's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(7):2289–2294. doi: 10.1002/art.21969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nguyen C, Cornelius J, Singson E, Killedar S, Cha S, Peck AB. Role of complement and B lymphocytes in Sjӧgren's syndrome-like autoimmune exocrinopathy of NOD.B10-H2b mice. Mol Immunol. 2006;43(9):1332–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Robinson CP, Yamachika S, Bounous DI, Brayer J, Jonsson R, Holmdahl R, et al. A novel NOD-derived murine model of primary Sjӧgren's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(1):150–156. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:1<150::AID-ART18>3.0.CO;2-T [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Delaleu N, Nguyen CQ, Peck AB, Jonsson R. Sjӧgren's syndrome: studying the disease in mice. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(3):217 doi: 10.1186/ar3313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang H, Antoine DJ, Andersson U, Tracey KJ. The many faces of HMGB1: molecular structure-functional activity in inflammation, apoptosis, and chemotaxis. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93(6):865–873. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1212662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lotze MT, Tracey KJ. High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(4):331–342. doi: 10.1038/nri1594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Avalos AM, Kiefer K, Tian J, Christensen S, Shlomchik M, Coyle AJ, et al. RAGE-independent autoreactive B cell activation in response to chromatin and HMGB1/DNA immune complexes. Autoimmunity. 2010;43(1):103–110. doi: 10.3109/08916930903384591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yanai H, Ban T, Wang Z, Choi MK, Kawamura T, Negishi H, et al. HMGB proteins function as universal sentinels for nucleic-acid-mediated innate immune responses. Nature. 2009;462(7269):99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature08512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsung A, Tohme S, Billiar TR. High-mobility group box-1 in sterile inflammation. J Intern Med. 2014;276(5):425–443. doi: 10.1111/joim.12276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bertheloot D, Latz E. HMGB1, IL-1alpha, IL-33 and S100 proteins: dual-function alarmins. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016. August 29 doi: 10.1038/cmi.2016.34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang F, Huang G, Hu B, Fang LP, Cao EH, Xin XF, et al. Anti-HMGB1 neutralizing antibody ameliorates neutrophilic airway inflammation by suppressing dendritic cell-mediated Th17 polarization. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:257930 doi: 10.1155/2014/257930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.von Burg N, Turchinovich G, Finke D. Maintenance of Immune Homeostasis through ILC/T Cell Interactions. Front Immunol. 2015;6:416 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eberl G, Colonna M, Di Santo JP, McKenzie AN. Innate lymphoid cells. Innate lymphoid cells: a new paradigm in immunology. Science. 2015;348(6237):aaa6566 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Doyle ME, Boggs L, Attia R, Cooper LR, Saban DR, Nguyen CQ, et al. Autoimmune dacryoadenitis of NOD/LtJ mice and its subsequent effects on tear protein composition. Am J Pathol. 2007;171(4):1224–1236. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lavoie TN, Lee BH, Nguyen CQ. Current concepts: mouse models of Sjӧgren's syndrome. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:549107 doi: 10.1155/2011/549107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen Y-T, Li S, Nikulina K, Porco T, Gallup M, McNamara N. Immune profile of squamous metaplasia development in autoimmune regulator-deficient dry eye. Molecular vision. 2009;15:563–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scardina GA, Spano G, Carini F, Spicola M, Valenza V, Messina P, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of serial sections of labial salivary gland biopsies in Sjӧgren's syndrome. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(8):E565–568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hornung V, Rothenfusser S, Britsch S, Krug A, Jahrsdorfer B, Giese T, et al. Quantitative expression of toll-like receptor 1–10 mRNA in cellular subsets of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and sensitivity to CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. J Immunol. 2002;168(9):4531–4537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Duan L, Wang CY, Chen J, Gong Q, Zhu P, Zheng F, et al. High-mobility group box 1 promotes early acute allograft rejection by enhancing IL-6-dependent Th17 alloreactive response. Lab Invest. 2011;91(1):43–53. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Su Z, Sun C, Zhou C, Liu Y, Zhu H, Sandoghchian S, et al. HMGB1 blockade attenuates experimental autoimmune myocarditis and suppresses Th17-cell expansion. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(12):3586–3595. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.He Z, Shotorbani SS, Jiao Z, Su Z, Tong J, Liu Y, et al. HMGB1 promotes the differentiation of Th17 via up-regulating TLR2 and IL-23 of CD14+ monocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Immunol. 2012;76(5):483–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02759.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nikoopour E, Bellemore SM, Singh B. IL-22, cell regeneration and autoimmunity. Cytokine. 2015;74(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goto Y, Obata T, Kunisawa J, Sato S, Ivanov II, Lamichhane A, et al. Innate lymphoid cells regulate intestinal epithelial cell glycosylation. Science. 2014;345(6202):1254009 doi: 10.1126/science.1254009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Munneke JM, Bjorklund AT, Mjosberg JM, Garming-Legert K, Bernink JH, Blom B, et al. Activated innate lymphoid cells are associated with a reduced susceptibility to graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2014;124(5):812–821. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-536888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sedda S, Marafini I, Figliuzzi MM, Pallone F, Monteleone G. An overview of the role of innate lymphoid cells in gut infections and inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:235460 doi: 10.1155/2014/235460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hepworth MR, Fung TC, Masur SH, Kelsen JR, McConnell FM, Dubrot J, et al. Immune tolerance. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells mediate intestinal selection of commensal bacteria-specific CD4(+) T cells. Science. 2015;348(6238):1031–1035. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanati G, Aryan Z, Barbadi M, Rezaei N. Innate lymphoid cells are pivotal actors in allergic, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11(8):885–895. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2015.1050382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Annunziato F, Romagnani C, Romagnani S. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(3):626–635. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mortha A, Chudnovskiy A, Hashimoto D, Bogunovic M, Spencer SP, Belkaid Y, et al. Microbiota-dependent crosstalk between macrophages and ILC3 promotes intestinal homeostasis. Science. 2014;343(6178):1249288 doi: 10.1126/science.1249288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee Y, Kumagai Y, Jang MS, Kim JH, Yang BG, Lee EJ, et al. Intestinal Lin- c-Kit+ NKp46- CD4- population strongly produces IL-22 upon IL-1beta stimulation. J Immunol. 2013;190(10):5296–5305. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Straino S, Di Carlo A, Mangoni A, De Mori R, Guerra L, Maurelli R, et al. High-mobility group box 1 protein in human and murine skin: involvement in wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(6):1545–1553. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu A, Fang H, Dirsch O, Jin H, Dahmen U. Oxidation of HMGB1 causes attenuation of its pro-inflammatory activity and occurs during liver ischemia and reperfusion. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35379 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tang D, Kang R, Zeh HJ 3rd, Lotze MT. High-mobility group box 1, oxidative stress, and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(7):1315–1335. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wild CA, Bergmann C, Fritz G, Schuler P, Hoffmann TK, Lotfi R, et al. HMGB1 conveys immunosuppressive characteristics on regulatory and conventional T cells. Int Immunol. 2012;24(8):485–494. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxs051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.