ABSTRACT
The draft whole-genome sequence of the Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 insect cell line was obtained using long-read PacBio sequence technology and Canu assembly. The final assembled genome consisted of 451 Mbp in 4,577 contigs, with 12,716× mean coverage and a G+C content of 36.53%.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Spodoptera frugiperda cell lines and their derivatives are used to produce a variety of baculovirus-expressed biological products. The Sf9 cell line is known to produce low-level reverse transcriptase (RT) activity (1, 2), which might be associated with particles. Additionally, other endogenous viral genes related to a rhabdovirus (3) are also present in the Sf9 DNA (4). The availability of the Sf9 genome sequence can help identify and characterize endogenous viral sequences of interest and aid in chromosomal mapping and investigating factors regulating their expression. This paper presents a draft of the whole-genome sequence of the Sf9 cell line, which was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (CRL-1711, lot number 58078522; ATCC, Manassas, VA). The Sf9 cell line was cloned from the parent Sf21 cell line (IPLB-Sf-21-AE), which was derived from pupal ovarian tissue of the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) (5).
Total cell DNA was extracted from Sf9 cells using the Qiagen Gentra Puregene cell kit (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD). The library was prepared by shearing DNA using g-TUBES (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA), targeting an average fragment size of 20 kb, and sequencing was done on the RSII (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA) at the Institute for Genomic Sciences (University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD). The SMRTbell template preparation kit (Pacific Biosciences) was used to ligate hairpin adapters required for sequencing to the fragmented DNA. The library was size selected using BluePippin (Sage Science, Beverly, MA) and sequenced using PacBio’s P6-C4 chemistry using 240-min movies. The total raw data generated was 47×. Reads were trimmed, corrected, and assembled using the Canu assembler version 1.2 (6). The final assembled genome consisted of 451 Mbp in 4,577 contigs, with 12.7× mean coverage. The largest contig size was 3,055,912 bp. Scaffolds (2,396) were generated using SSPACE-LongRead (7). The N50 of the contigs was 250,325 bases, and the N50 of the scaffolds was 606,288 bases. The G+C content of the Sf9 genome was 36.53%. The size of the Sf9 genome was in the range expected of lepidopteran genomes; however, it was larger than that of the Sf21 cell line (385 Mbp), which was obtained using Illumina short-read sequence technology (8).
Repeat elements were identified in Sf9 scaffolds using Repeat Masker version 4.0.7 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) using Arthropoda as the query species, with default parameters. There were 4,096 retroelements, which consisted of non-LTR elements and LTR elements (0.98% of the genome) and 390 DNA transposons (0.03%). Additional retrovirus-related and other endogenous viral sequences will be identified using BLAST (9) and HMMER (10) searches against available virus and repeat family databases. Furthermore, analysis is ongoing to predict chromosomal location and gene annotation.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. NJHR00000000. The version described in this paper is version NJHR01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This article reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent the FDA’s views and policies. Any mention of product or trade names does not constitute recommendation for use by the U.S. FDA.
We declare no conflicts of financial or personal interest.
Footnotes
Citation Nandakumar S, Ma H, Khan AS. 2017. Whole-genome sequence of the Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 insect cell line. Genome Announc 5:e00829-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00829-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cox MM, Hollister JR. 2009. FluBlok, a next generation influenza vaccine manufactured in insect cells. Biologicals 37:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lovatt A, Black J, Galbraith D, Doherty I, Moran MW, Shepherd AJ, Griffen A, Bailey A, Wilson N, Smith KT. 1999. High throughput detection of retrovirus-associated reverse transcriptase using an improved fluorescent product enhanced reverse transcriptase assay and its comparison to conventional detection methods. J Virol Methods 82:185–200. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00111-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ma H, Galvin TA, Glasner DR, Shaheduzzaman S, Khan AS. 2014. Identification of a novel rhabdovirus in Spodoptera frugiperda cell lines. J Virol 88:6576–6585. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00780-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Geisler C, Jarvis DL. 2016. Rhabdovirus-like endogenous viral elements in the genome of Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells are actively transcribed: implications for adventitious virus detection. Biologicals 44:219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vaughn JL, Goodwin RH, Tompkins GJ, McCawley P. 1977. The establishment of two cell lines from the insect Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). In Vitro 13:213–217. doi: 10.1007/BF02615077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2014. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15:211. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kakumani PK, Malhotra P, Mukherjee SK, Bhatnagar RK. 2014. A draft genome assembly of the army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Genomics 104:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eddy SR. 1998. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14:755–763. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]