Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the second leading cause of cancer death in Western men.1 At the present time, the most commonly used imaging methods to detect sites of metastatic PCa are x-ray computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. In an effort to improve upon the sensitivity and specify of these tests, many in the field have pursued the development molecularly-targeted imaging agents that utilize positron emission tomography (PET).2,3 Currently, the most promising PET radiotracers for PCa imaging target prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a type II transmembrane glycoprotein that is highly expressed on PCa epithelial cells.4 A potential drawback of PSMA-targeted imaging of PCa, however, is that tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation do not reliably express PSMA,5 thus providing a potential source of false negative tests. Here, we report a case in which PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging results were compared with lesion-specific genomic and histologic data, advancing our understanding of this imaging modality in the context of neuroendocrine PCa.
Case Presentation
We report the case of a 69-year-old man who presented in December 2012 with persistent gross hematuria. Cystoscopy demonstrated tumor in the prostatic urethra, and digital rectal examination revealed an indurated and fixed prostate. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 0.7 ng/mL, and prostate biopsy confirmed Gleason score 5 + 4 = 9 cancer in 6 of 12 cores. Staging imaging with CT and bone scan demonstrated no evidence of metastatic disease, and thus, in April 2013 the patient underwent a robotic radical prostatectomy at an outside institution. Surgical pathology revealed adenocarcinoma with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes (pT3aN0). Initial postsurgical serum PSA was undetectable, but PSA was detected at 0.24 ng/mL 6 months following surgery. CT and bone scan in October 2013 demonstrated multiple vertebral lesions consistent with metastases, and treatment was initiated with leuprolide, bicalutamide, and sipuleucel-T. In November 2014, radium-223 was added owing to PSA progression. Subsequent imaging demonstrated multiple lesions of the spine, liver, peritoneum, and left cerebellar hemisphere. The patient underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy of the spinal lesions and initiated docetaxel, which was then substituted with carboplatin and etoposide due to neuropathy. He then developed a pathologic fracture of the left ileum requiring surgical fixation. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging in October 2015 revealed widespread metastatic disease.
The patient next elected to enroll in a study of PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Interestingly, the patient’s metastatic lesions demonstrated highly variable radiotracer uptake on this exam (Figure 1). Overall, the patient’s pattern of metastatic disease was highly atypical, with peritoneal, liver, and cerebellar parenchymal lesions. A pelvic lesion was highly avid (lean body mass corrected [maximum standardized uptake value] SUVmax = 10.2), a sternal lesion was moderately avid (SUVmax = 3.3), peritoneal lesions had moderate avidity (SUVmax = 3.1), and the liver lesions had no perceptible radiotracer uptake. A lesion in the right cerebellar hemisphere also demonstrated mild to moderate radiotracer uptake (SUVmax = 1.7, Figure 2). The patient subsequently underwent core-needle biopsy of the peritoneal and liver lesions. Histology revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma consistent with the known prostate primary and poorly differentiated metastatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine features, respectively. Owing to the patient’s poor response to conventional therapies and findings consistent with a neuroendocrine phenotype, we elected to perform genomic sequencing and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of the tissue obtained from the liver biopsy to potentially identify therapeutic targets.
Figure 1.
Axial PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Images Showing a Liver Metastasis Without Radiotracer Uptake (A, Arrowhead) and a Peritoneal Metastasis With Moderate Radiotracer Uptake (B, Arrowheads)
Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; PET = positron emission tomography; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen.
Figure 2.
Right Cerebellar Hemisphere Lesion Suspected to Represent Metastatic Prostate Cancer as Demonstrated on Axial 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Image With Focal Radiotracer Uptake That Correlates to a Lesion With Associated Vasogenic Edema (A) on an Axial T2-Weighted Fat Saturation Magnetic Resonance (MR) Image and Enhancement (B) on an Axial T1-Weighted Post-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Image (C)
Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; PET = positron emission tomography.
Genomic data revealed that the liver lesion harbored the RB1 mutation E413X (nonsense; mutant fraction 53%) and TP53 mutation I195T (missense; mutant fraction 85%); alterations consistent with neuroendocrine differentiation.6,7 Moreover, IHC staining for PSMA and the androgen receptor were negative, and staining for synaptophysin was strongly positive (Figure 3). The peritoneal lesion was also largely negative for PSMA and androgen receptor, and showed overexpression of p53 protein. In contrast, the moderately PET-avid peritoneal lesion was negative for synaptophysin and positive for NKX3.1 and CD56 (data not shown), findings consistent with a degree of neuroendocrine differentiation but with retained features of adenocarcinoma.
Figure 3.
Immunohistochemical Staining of the Patient’s Primary Tumor, Peritoneal Metastasis and Liver Metastasis. Moderate Staining for PSMA Was Observed in the Primary Tumor and Peritoneal Metastasis. In Contrast, the Liver Metastasis Had No Perceptible PSMA Staining. Both the Androgen Receptor and Cyclin D1 Were Found to Be Expressed in the Primary Tumor but Subsequently Lost in the 2 Metastases. The Pattern of Staining for CCND1 Suggests That the RB1 Gene Was Intact in the Primary Lesion and That Loss Occurred Early in the Development of Metastases. Synaptophysin (a Marker of Neuroendocrine Differentiation) Was Only Found in the Liver Metastasis. Finally, p53 Over-Expression Consistent With TP53 Mutation Was Observed in Both the Primary Tumor and Metastases, Suggesting the Possibility That the Observed Mutation Occurred as an Early Event in the Course of the Patient’s Disease
Abbreviations: AR = androgen receptor; CCND1 = cyclin D1; H&E = hematoxylin and eosin; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen.
Following imaging, the patient underwent stereotactic radiotherapy of his cerebellar lesion, radio-embolization of the liver lesions, and continued systemic therapy with carboplatin and etoposide. CT imaging in March 2016 showed mild progression of bony and liver metastases, an enlarging omental mass, and new pelvic lymphadenopathy. The patient was subsequently transitioned to low-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide.
Discussion
PSMA is overexpressed in >90% of local and distant PCa lesions,8,9 making it an ideal molecular target for imaging PCa.4 Initial clinical experience with 18F-DCFPyL, a fluorinated urea-based small molecule targeting PSMA, has yielded promising results to this point.10–13 One potential pitfall of PSMA imaging is in the setting of neuroendocrine differentiation, whereby PSMA expression is downregulated on tumor cells.5 This relationship was invoked to explain the absence of radiotracer uptake in one recent case report of imaging neuroendocrine PCa with a gallium-68-labeled PSMA-targeted PET radiotracer, although that case lacked tumor immunohistochemistry or genomic data.14 In the present case, we have demonstrated a direct relationship between radiotracer uptake on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging and the intensity of PSMA expression on IHC staining. Specifically, we obtained tissue from a peritoneal metastasis with moderate radiotracer uptake and a liver metastasis with no uptake, and we confirmed that PSMA was moderately expressed in the peritoneal metastasis and not expressed in the liver metastasis.
Genomic analysis of the liver lesion further supports the association of PSMA downregulation with neuroendocrine differentiation, as the liver lesion harbored mutations of RB1 and TP53, alterations consistent with known pathways of neuroendocrine progression.6,7 Interestingly, additional staining of the peritoneal lesion implicated these pathways as well. IHC revealed overexpression of p53 protein, likely owing to an underlying missense mutation (such as I195T) stabilizing the protein, and loss of cyclin d1 protein, likely secondary to RB1 loss-of-function (such as E413X).15 In light of this, the peritoneal metastasis appears to be clonally related to that biopsied from the liver. At the same time, the peritoneal lesion was negative for synaptophysin and positive for CD56 (data not shown), findings consistent with adenocarcinoma. Thus, features of the peritoneal lesion suggest a primary adenocarcinoma undergoing transition to the neuroendocrine phenotype.16
Although PSMA-targeted imaging has several advantages relative to conventional modalities for PCa detection, our findings support the hypothesis that neuroendocrine differentiation of PCa results in downregulation of PSMA expression and thus absence of radiotracer localization in vivo. As such, care must be taken in evaluating advanced tumors or those with neuroendocrine differentiation. Suspected cases may necessitate continued use of conventional imaging in combination with emerging modalities when expected findings are not well-established. Alternatively, heterobivalent ligands targeting both PSMA and neuroendocrine markers may prove most useful, although such radiotracers are not yet clinically available.
Clinical Practice Points.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a cell surface enzyme that is highly expressed by prostate cancer epithelial cells.
PSMA has been extensively explored as a target for prostate cancer imaging.
18F-DCFPyL is a urea-based small molecule inhibitor of PSMA that has been developed for positron emission tomography imaging.
One potential drawback of PSMA-targeted imaging of prostate cancer is that tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation do not reliably express PSMA.
In this report, we compare 18F-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging findings with lesion-specific genomic and histologic data in a patient with neuroendocrine prostate cancer.
Acknowledgments
AER is supported by a Department of Defense Physician Research Training Award (W81XWH–13–1–0445) as well as a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award and Patrick C. Walsh Investigator Grant.
Footnotes
Disclosure
MGP is a co-inventor on a US Patent covering 18F-DCFPyL and as such is entitled to a portion of any licensing fees and royalties generated by this technology. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. MAG is a paid consultant for Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, the licensee of 18F-DCFPyL. All other authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kiess AP, Cho SY, Pomper MG. Translational molecular imaging of prostate cancer. Curr Radiol Rep. 2013;1:216–26. doi: 10.1007/s40134-013-0020-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kiess A, Banerjee S, Mease R, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen as a target for cancer imaging and therapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;59:241–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Allaf ME, et al. PET imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer: current state of the art and future challenges. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016;19:223–30. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hansel DE, Nakayama M, Luo J, et al. Shared TP53 gene mutation in morphologically and phenotypically distinct concurrent primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Prostate. 2009;69:603–9. doi: 10.1002/pros.20910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou Z, Flesken-Nikitin A, Corney DC, et al. Synergy of p53 and Rb deficiency in a conditional mouse model for metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7889–98. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tan HL, Sood A, Rahimi HA, et al. Rb loss is characteristic of prostatic small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:890–903. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Minner S, Wittmer C, Graefen M, et al. High level PSMA expression is associated with early psa recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011;71:281–8. doi: 10.1002/pros.21241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ananias HJK, van den Heuvel MC, Helfrich W, de Jong IJ. Expression of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, the prostate stem cell antigen and the prostate-specific membrane antigen in lymph node and bone metastases of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2009;69:1101–8. doi: 10.1002/pros.20957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, et al. Initial evaluation of [18F]DCFPyL for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:565–74. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dietlein M, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, et al. Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:575–84. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rowe SP, Mana-Ay M, Javadi MS, et al. PSMA-based detection of prostate cancer bone lesions with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT: a sensitive alternative to 99mTc-MDP bone scan and Na18F PET/CT? Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14:e115–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rowe SP, Macura KJ, Mena E, et al. PSMA-Based [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging for lesion detection in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18:411–9. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-0957-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chakraborty PS, Tripathi M, Agarwal KK, Kumar R, Vijay MK, Bal C. Metastatic poorly differentiated prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:e163–6. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsai H, Morais CL, Alshalalfa M, et al. Cyclin D1 loss distinguishes prostatic small-cell carcinoma from most prostatic adenocarcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:5619–29. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clegg N, Ferguson C, True LD, et al. Molecular characterization of prostatic small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Prostate. 2003;55:55–64. doi: 10.1002/pros.10217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



