Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0182878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182878

Outer membrane proteins analysis of Shigella sonnei and evaluation of their antigenicity in Shigella infected individuals

Hemavathy Harikrishnan 1, Kirnpal Kaur Banga Singh 1,*, Asma Ismail 2,3
Editor: Kalimuthusamy Natarajaseenivasan4
PMCID: PMC5573271  PMID: 28846684

Abstract

Bacillary dysentery caused by infection with Shigella spp. remains as serious and common health problem throughout the world. It is a highly multi drug resistant organism and rarely identified from the patient at the early stage of infection. S. sonnei is the most frequently isolated species causing shigellosis in industrialized countries. The antigenicity of outer membrane protein of this pathogen expressed during human infection has not been identified to date. We have studied the antigenic outer membrane proteins expressed by S. sonnei, with the aim of identifying presence of specific IgA and IgG in human serum against the candidate protein biomarkers. Three antigenic OMPs sized 33.3, 43.8 and 100.3 kDa were uniquely recognized by IgA and IgG from patients with S. sonnei infection, and did not cross-react with sera from patients with other types of infection. The antigenic proteome data generated in this study are a first for OMPs of S. sonnei, and they provide important insights of human immune responses. Furthermore, numerous prime candidate proteins were identified which will aid the development of new diagnostic tools for the detection of S. sonnei.

Introduction

Shigella sonnei, the causative agent of shigellosis (also known as bacillary dysentery), is a Gram-negative human facultative pathogen where the infection acquired by faecal-oral route and enters the human body via the ingestion of contaminated food and water [1]. The bacteria are highly infectious, since as few as 10 to 100 microorganisms are capable to cause disease as they are able to survive in acidic environment in the stomach [2, 3]. Shigellosis has been reported as a disease of all age groups but it is commonly seen in pediatric patients [46]. It causes approximately 1.1 million people die each year, and 60% of diarrhea-associated mortality among children’s below five years old in developing countries [7, 8]. The pathogenesis of shigellosis includes inflammation, ulceration, haemorrhage, tissue destruction and fibrosis of the colonic mucosal. These clinical symptoms will lead to abdominal pain and diarrhea [9].

Although antibiotics are used for treatment in all cases of shigellosis but due to the global emergence of drug resistance, the choice of antimicrobial agents for treating shigellosis is limited[9]. The Shigella resistance locus (SRL) has been identified in Shigella strains which mediates resistance to antibiotics[10].

Despite all these, the presence of this organism is still detected using traditional diagnostic methods such as culture and biochemical test. This traditional method, which is time consuming and may take at least 48 to 72 hours or even longer to obtain a result. The early diagnosis and treatment are important to control the outbreak of this contagious disease. [11]. Therefore it is crucial to develop a new, fast, specific and sensitive, and economical test for rapid detection of S. sonnei infections. Development of such a test would require the identification of specific antigenic proteins and OMPs that are recognized by host antibodies [12]. OMPs of Shigella are suitable antigenic proteins due to their well-known role in the molecular pathogenesis of shigellosis [13]. Besides that, the OMPs due to their location, have been known to elicit a host immune response and are also categorized as virulence factors [14]. Some proteins in OMPs of the bacterium are exposed on the cell surface and may influence the physiological functions of the tissue, contributing to the mechanisms of pathogenicity and development of inflammatory response [15, 16].

This study was conducted to determine the presence of antigenic and specific OMPs in S. sonnei that are recognized by host antibodies and to identify the presence of specific Ig in patients’ sera against the candidate protein(s). This protein(s) can be utilized as a potential biomarker test against S. sonnei.

Materials and methods

Collection and culture of bacterial strains

The clinical strain of S. sonnei SH080, SH039 and SH040 used in this study were obtained from the Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. These clinical isolates were obtained from patients that were culture positive for S. sonnei. A reference strain, S. sonnei ATCC 25931, was used in this study and was the standard organism for protein profiling in this study. S. sonnei ATCC 25931 and the clinical isolates were maintained in trypticase soy broth with 20% glycerol and kept at -20°C [17].

Ethics statement

Samples were collected from patients of either sex admitted in the ward or patients attending the outpatient clinics at the Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, within 3 weeks of the cultural diagnosis of pathogens. The subjects ranged from 12 to 50 years of age and had feelings of illness due to diarrhea. Patients with mixed bacterial infection were excluded. The bacterial strains were identified at the species level using a commercial biochemical differentiation kit (API CAMPY, bioMe´rieux). The use of human sample was approved by the Human Ethical Committee of Universiti Sains Malaysia (USMKK/PPP/JEPeM/248.3(10)). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before participation in the study.

Outer membrane proteins preparation

Bacteria were grown at 37°C in nutrient broth for 18 hours and harvested by centrifugation. OMPs were extracted using a previously described method [12, 18]. Briefly, bacteria were grown in 2 L of nutrient broth and incubated in a shaker (Forma Orbital Shaker, Model-420, USA) at 37°C at 200 rpm for 18 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 15,900 x g for 30 minutes and resuspended in 8 ml of 0.01M HEPES (N-2 hydroxyethylpiperazine-N’-2ethanesulfonicacid) buffer (pH7.4) containing 8 μl of 10 mM DNAse (Sigma, USA), 8 μl of 10 mM RNAse (Sigma, USA) and 800 μl of 100 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (~0.2 mm in diameter, BDH Chemical Ltd., UK). Bacterial cells were disrupted by vortexing with glass beads (~0.2 mm in diameter, BDH Chemical Ltd.) for 1.5 hours with 1 minute alternate on ice until 95% lysis was achieved. The cell lysate was aspirated and the glass beads washed with 0.01 M HEPES buffer until the washings were cleared. The disrupted cells were centrifuged at 7800 x g, 4°C for 15 minutes to remove the undisrupted cells. Then, the supernatant was centrifuged with an ultracentrifuge (Hitachi, Model CP 80MX) at 145,100 x g, 4°C for 1 hour (using rotor type P40 ST) to separate the envelope fractions. The cell envelope sediment was extracted with 0.01 M HEPES containing 4% Triton X-100 (Bio-Rad, USA) to detach the cytoplasmic inner membrane from outer membrane. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The insoluble OMPs was pelleted using ultracentrifuge (Hitachi, Model CP 80MX) at 181,800 x g, 4°C for 1 hour (using rotor type P5S ST2). The pellet was resuspended with 4 ml of 30 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0. The total protein concentrations in the samples were determined using a Bradford assay method (Bio-Rad, USA).

Profiling of the OMPs of S. sonnei using sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

In this study, discontinuous SDS-PAGE protocol was used to analyse protein profiles of S. sonnei based on differences in their molecular weight. Protein samples containing 30 ug of proteins were resolved on10% polyacrylamide gel by applying 35 mA current for 3 hr using PROTEAN II xi (Bio-Rad, USA). The OMPs obtained was re-suspended with sample buffer containing 0.1% SDS and β-mercaptoethanol (10%). The OMPs profile of S. sonnei was observed via SDS-PAGE gel stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (Bio-Rad, USA).

Western blot

Western blotting was performed using standard protocol [12, 18]. OMPs were resolved via SDS-PAGE and electroblotted from the gel to a 0.45 μm pore size nitrocellulose membrane by electrophoretic transfer using Bio-Rad Transblot apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The electroblotting condition was set at 100 V for 4 hours according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The nitrocellulose membrane was then blocked with 3% skim milk for 30 min at room temperature to block the non-specific protein binding sites. The blocked nitrocellulose membranes were cut into strips and incubated overnight with 1:100 dilutions of human serum as the primary antibody. Sera used in this study as follows: from patients positive for S. sonnei infection; and patients from other enteric infections due to Salmonella spp., Aeromonas hydrophila, EPEC, Salmonella Typhi and Campylobacter jejuni. After primary antibody incubation, the strips were washed with PBS-T (0.05% Tween 20) 6 times for 10 minute each. It was then incubated with rabbit anti-human IgA and IgG (Sigma, USA) conjugated with alkaline phosphatase for 2 hours at room temperature with constant shaking. The strips were washed with PBS-T as above and then developed with AP-conjugated substrate for 30 minute. The enzyme reaction was stopped by rinsing the strips with distilled water.

Determining the presence of antigenic and specific protein(s) of S. sonnei in OMPs using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

The protein bands were determined by using image analyzer (SYNGENE Bio Imaging System, Japan) to measure the molecular weight of the bands against the reference standard. The analysis involved construction of a standard calibration curve according to the value of the standard molecular weight markers. Subsequently, the bands were located from the captured image of the SDS-PAGE profile and their corresponding molecular weight was determined. Comparison against positive control sera and elimination of the cross-reactive proteins with sera from patients with other enteric infections were performed to determine the specific and antigenic protein(s) expressed by S. sonnei.

The main aim of this study was to determine the presence of OMPs of S. sonnei that are both antigenic and specifically recognized by serum from humans infected with S. sonnei. The following 9 different types of serum were used for Western blot analysis: 4 (SS01, SS02, SS03 and SS04) from culture-positive cases of S. sonnei; 5 from patients infected with Salmonella spp. (SASP01), Aeromonas hydrophila (AH01), EPEC (E01), Salmonella Typhi (ST01) and Campylobacter jejuni (CAMPY01) respectively. Before checking the antigenicity and specificity of the OMPs of S. sonnei by Western blot, the total immunoglobulin profiles of all the sera as well as the specific immunoglobulin profiles against S. sonnei OMPs were tested. Total immunoglobulin was tested via dot enzyme immunoassay (EIA) by dotting the sera and probed with IgA and G as primary antibody and the complex was visualized using anti-human immunoglobulin A and G conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. The specific immunoglobulin profiles against the antigenic protein were determined by dotting OMPs of S. sonnei and probed individually with IgA and IgG. Since all the tested sera gave high positive reaction with OMPs of the clinical isolate, all the sera were selected for Western blot analysis in order to determine the antigenicity of each protein present in the OMPs mixture.

Results

Determination of presence of antibodies (IgA and IgG) against SH080, Shigella sonnei OMPs

Figs 1 and 2 show the immunoblot profile of all the four sera from patients infected with S sonnei against the IgA and IgG isotype respectively. A total of 13 antigenic bands were observed in the OMPs of S. sonnei when probed with shigellosis patients’ sera as shown in Table 1. Of these 13 antigenic bands, 11 proteins (molecular weight 25.6, 27.4, 29.0, 33.3, 35.0, 37.8, 43.8, 57.0, 63.2, 88.2 and 100.3 kDa) were recognized against the anti-human IgA when probed with sera SS001 and SS002. However, with SS003 serum, only seven antigenic bands (25.6, 27.4, 29.0, 37.8, 43.8, 57.0 and 100.3 kDa) were recognized against anti-human IgA, whereas, with SH004 only five antigenic bands (27.4, 29.0, 57.0, 88.2 and 100.3 kDa) were recognized. When tested with anti-human IgG, there were ten antigenic bands (25.6, 27.4, 29.0, 33.3, 38.5, 43.8, 46.3, 57.0, 88.2 and 100.3 kDa) with sera SS001 and SS002 whereas, sera SS003 and SS004 only recognized four (25.6, 27.4, 29.0 and 35.0 kDa) and six (27.4 kDa, 33.3 kDa, 35.0 kDa, 46.3 kDa, 88.2 kDa and 100.3 kDa) antigenic proteins respectively.

Fig 1. Western blot result of OMPs of S. sonnei probed with anti-human IgA.

Fig 1

Strip-1: S. sonnei (SS001), Strip-2: S. sonnei (SS002), Strip-3: S. sonnei (SS003), Strip-4: S. sonnei (SS004), Strip-5: Salmonella species (SASP01), Strip-6: EPEC (E01), Strip-7: Salmonella Typhi (ST01), Strip-8: Aeromonas hydrophila (AH01), Strip-9: Campylobacter jejuni (CAMPY01).

Fig 2. Western blot result of OMPs of S. sonnei probed with anti-human IgG.

Fig 2

Strip-1: S. sonnei (SS001), Strip-2: S. sonnei (SS002), Strip-3: S. sonnei (SS003), Strip-4: S. sonnei (SS004), Strip-5: Salmonella species (SASP01), Strip-6: EPEC (E01), Strip-7: Salmonella Typhi (ST01), Strip-8: Aeromonas hydrophila (AH01), Strip-9: Campylobacter jejuni (CAMPY01).

Table 1. Summary of cross-reacting immunogenic OMPs of S. sonnei when probed with anti-human IgA.

Molecular weight of the bands Immunogenic bands when probed with anti-human IgA Immunogenic bands that did/did not cross-reacted with non-shigellosis sera
SS001 SS002 SS003 SS004 SASP01 E01 ST01 AH01 CAMPY01
25.6 kDa + + + ND CR CR CR CR ND
27.4 kDa + + + + CR CR CR CR ND
29.0 kDa + + + + Do not cross react
33.3 kDa + + ND ND Do not cross react
35.0 kDa + + ND ND CR CR CR CR CR
37.8 kDa + + + + CR CR CR CR ND
43.8 kDa + + + ND Do not cross react
57.0 kDa + + + + ND CR CR ND ND
63.2 kDa + + ND ND ND ND CR ND ND
88.2 kDa + + ND ND Do not cross react
100.3 kDa + + + + Do not cross react

+ Indicate the observation of antigenic band. ND: Not detected; CR: Cross-reacted with non-shigellosis sera.

The study demonstrated that, some protein bands were exclusively recognized by only one subtype of antibody by all the S. sonnei sera. For example, two proteins were exclusively detected when probed with anti-human IgA (37.8 and 63.2 kDa) and another two proteins (46.3 and 38.5 kDa) were exclusively detected with anti-human IgG. The study also revealed the recognition of both isotype of antibodies (IgA and IgG) against eight protein bands of S. sonnei (25.6, 27.4, 29.0, 33.3, 43.8, 57.0, 88.2 and 100.3 kDa) when tested with sera SS001 and SS002.

Majority of the other antigenic bands were cross-reacting with most of the non-shigellosis sera tested. When evaluating for cross reactivity, among the 11 antigenic proteins seen in the shigellosis sera against IgA subtype only five bands (29.0, 33.3, 43.8, 88.2 and 100.3 kDa) did not cross-reacted with non-shigellosis sera as shown in Table 1. Another five bands (33.3, 38.5, 43.8, 57.0 and 100.3 kDa) were seen in the shigellosis sera against IgG subtype did not cross reacted with non-shigellosis sera as shown in Table 2. However, four protein bands (25.6, 29.0, 46.3 and 88.2 kDa) were only cross-reacting with only one non-shigellosis serum. The band 25.6 kDa cross-reacted with sera Aeromonas hydrophila while the band 29.0 kDa cross-reacted with sera Campylobacter jejuni. However, protein of 63.2 kDa in size was only cross-reacting with one non-shigellosis serum (ST01, Salmonella Typhi).

Table 2. Summary of cross-reacting immunogenic OMPs of S. sonnei when probed with anti-human IgG.

Molecular weight of the bands Immunogenic bands when probed with anti-human IgG Immunogenic bands that did/did not cross-reacted with non-shigellosis sera
SS001 SS002 SS003 SS004 SASP01 E01 ST01 AH01 CAMPY01
25.6 kDa + + + ND ND ND ND CR ND
27.4 kDa + + + + CR ND ND CR CR
29.0 kDa + + + ND ND ND ND ND CR
33.3 kDa + + ND + Do not cross react
35.0 kDa ND ND + + CR CR ND CR CR
37.8 kDa + + ND ND Do not cross react
43.8 kDa + + ND ND Do not cross react
57.0 kDa + + ND + CR ND ND ND ND
63.2 kDa + + ND ND Do not cross react
88.2 kDa + + ND + CR ND ND ND ND
100.3 kDa + + ND + Do not cross react

+ Indicate the observation of antigenic band. ND: Not detected; CR: Cross-reacted with non-shigellosis sera.

The study demonstrated that three specific protein bands (33.3, 43.8 and 100.3 kDa) were found to be not cross-reacting with tested non-shigellosis sera against both isotypes of antibodies (IgA and IgG). These specific and antigenic bands (33.3, 43.8, 100.3 kDa) were also present in other clinical isolate of S. sonnei and in reference strain ATCC 25931 as shown in Fig 3.

Fig 3. Expression of the specific protein bands (33.3 kDa, 43.8 kDa and 100.3 kDa) in the OMPs of S. sonnei strains.

Fig 3

Lane 1: OMPs of S. sonnei ATCC 25931, Lane 2: OMPs of clinical isolate SH039, Lane 3: OMPs of clinical isolate SH040, Lane 4: OMPs of clinical isolate SH080, Lane 5: Low molecular weight marker.

Discussion

Immunoglobulins of different classes are important effectors of specific humoral immunity. A previous study reported that acquired immunity to Shigella produced by the secretory IgA and serum immunoglobulins, which are specific to some major bacterial pathogenic factors[19]. Another study also reported that the IgM antibody titers against OMPs were not significantly increased in patients infected with Shigella [19, 20]. As such, this study was conducted to focus on both IgA and IgG isotypes.

In this study, the immunoblot profile of OMPs of S. sonnei was studied to determine the host humoral immune response in shigellosis patients against the antigens in the OMPs. The analysis of this study showed variation in the host immune response between the sera tested. For example, the sera from patients SS001 and SS002 gave the highest number of antigenic bands against anti-human IgA, in which a total of 11 antigenic bands were recognized. Whereas, with serum SS003 and SS004, seven and four antigenic bands were observed respectively. These individual variations in antibody response against the antigen in the OMPs seen in this study showed that host humoral immune system responded differentially in each infection. Studies have proven that, genetics factors play a major role to determine the susceptibility of a species to an infection with enteric pathogen [21, 22].

A study reported that high level of IgA antibody was frequently detected between 10 and 20 days after the onset of Shigella infection [23]. Studies have also demonstrated that the total IgA in serum increases between 2 to 4 days after the onset of the disease and reached its highest level within the first week [2426]. In our study, the recognition of antigens with IgA antibodies in sera will be useful in diagnosing acute cases. An earlier study also reported the serum IgG antibody responses to proteins of Shigella spp. detected by immunoblot [27]. This experiment revealed that some antigenic proteins were exclusively recognized by IgA and IgG. In OMPs of S. sonnei few protein bands were exclusively recognized by anti-human IgA (37.8 kDa and 63.2 kDa) or anti-human IgG (38.5 kDa and 46.3 kDa). These findings suggest that the detection of antibody of a single immunoglobulin isotype may not be diagnostically sufficient. The combination of biomarkers in developing diagnostic test will be useful in decreasing false negative result for accurate diagnosis of shigellosis.

Several studies have been conducted previously on the discovery of biomarkers in Shigella spp. A study conducted using major outer membrane proteins (MOMPs) showed that the protein band sized ranging from 35 to 38 kDa and few other MOMPs act as major antigens in the induction of immune response in shigellosis [28, 29]. Similarly, in our study, serum immune response against the proteins of 33.0, 35.0 and 37.8 kDa in size was detected in the tested sera.

The immunogenic profile detected with Shigella sera were compared to the profile obtained with sera from other enteric infections. This is to determine the specific antigenic protein(s) expressed by S. sonnei by eliminating the cross-reactive proteins. In this study, we found that the three protein bands (33.3, 43.8 and 100.3 kDa) were recognized by shigellosis sera did not cross reacted with sera from other enteric infections. These protein candidates have potential to be used as a diagnostic biomarker for early diagnosis of shigellosis since the sera were collected from the early stage of Shigella infected patients. This study also showed that these protein bands were also present in the clinical isolates and reference strain of S. sonnei studied when SDS-PAGE was run. The occurrence of these bands in all the clinical isolate is also an indicator that these proteins are important for the virulence of S. sonnei during infection. In summary, this study has demonstrated the presence of antigenic protein bands of S. sonnei, which may be potential candidates for further evaluation towards the development of rapid diagnostic test. Further studies with a wider range of serum samples are needed to ensure the specificity and reliability of these antigenic bands as diagnostic biomarkers.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Dot-EIA result of OMPs (clinical isolate SH080) probed with patient’s sera of S. sonnei and other related infection.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Research University Cluster Grant (1001/PSKBP/8630012) titled “Molecular approaches to fundamental studies on biomarkers and development of sustainable rapid nanobiodiagnostics to enteric diseases for low resource settings” (2011–2013). We gratefully acknowledge the Institute for Postgraduate Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, for providing the fellowship assistance and the Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, for providing facilities and specimens.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a Research University Cluster Grant (1001/PSKBP/8630012) titled “Molecular approaches to fundamental studies on biomarkers and development of sustainable rapid nanobiodiagnostics to enteric diseases for low resource settings” (2011–2013) to KK. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ozuah PO. Shigella update. Pediatrics in review / American Academy of Pediatrics. 1998;19(3):100 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warren BR, Parish ME, Schneider KR. Shigella as a foodborne pathogen and current methods for detection in food. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006;46(7):551–67. doi: 10.1080/10408390500295458 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arya D, Chitkara NL, Agarwal KC, Ganguly NK. Shigellosis in Chandigarh. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1977;20(1):15–21. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.MoezArdalan K, Zali MR, Dallal MM, Hemami MR, Salmanzadeh-Ahrabi S. Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial resistance of Shigella species among patients with acute diarrhoea in Karaj, Tehran, Iran. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21(2):96–102. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raqib R, Moly PK, Sarker P, Qadri F, Alam NH, Mathan M, et al. Persistence of mucosal mast cells and eosinophils in Shigella-infected children. Infect Immun. 2003;71(5):2684–92. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2684-2692.2003 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC153256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Livio S, Strockbine NA, Panchalingam S, Tennant SM, Barry EM, Marohn ME, et al. Shigella isolates from the global enteric multicenter study inform vaccine development. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(7):933–41. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu468 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4166982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Faruque SM, Khan R, Kamruzzaman M, Yamasaki S, Ahmad QS, Azim T, et al. Isolation of Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and S. flexneri strains from surface waters in Bangladesh: comparative molecular analysis of environmental Shigella isolates versus clinical strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(8):3908–13. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3908-3913.2002 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC124020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Niyogi SK. Shigellosis. J Microbiol. 2005;43(2):133–43. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ashkenazi S. Shigella infections in children: new insights. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2004;15(4):246–52. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Turner SA, Luck SN, Sakellaris H, Rajakumar K, Adler B. Molecular epidemiology of the SRL pathogenicity island. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(2):727–34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.727-734.2003 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC151756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ojha SC, Yean Yean C, Ismail A, Singh KK. A pentaplex PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of Shigella species. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:412370 doi: 10.1155/2013/412370 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3586438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Islam AH, Singh KK, Ismail A. Demonstration of an outer membrane protein that is antigenically specific for Acinetobacter baumannii. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;69(1):38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.09.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pore D, Mahata N, Pal A, Chakrabarti MK. Outer membrane protein A (OmpA) of Shigella flexneri 2a, induces protective immune response in a mouse model. PloS one. 2011;6(7):e22663 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022663 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3144247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lory S, Tai PC. Biochemical and genetic aspects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1985;118:53–69. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Biswas T. Role of porin of Shigella dysenteriae type 1 in modulation of lipopolysaccharide mediated nitric oxide and interleukin-1 release by murine peritoneal macrophages. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000;29(2):129–36. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sansonetti PJ. Microbes and microbial toxins: paradigms for microbial-mucosal interactions III. Shigellosis: from symptoms to molecular pathogenesis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(3):G319–23. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harikrishnan H, Ismail A, Banga Singh KK. Temperature-regulated expression of outer membrane proteins in Shigella flexneri. Gut Pathog. 2013;5(1):38 doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-38 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4029548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ismail A, Hai OK, Kader ZA. Demonstration of an antigenic protein specific for Salmonella typhi. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;181(1):301–5. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sansonetti P, Phalipon A. Shigellosis: from molecular pathogenesis of infection to protective immunity and vaccine development. Res Immunol. 1996;147(8–9):595–602. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Islam D, Wretlind B, Ryd M, Lindberg AA, Christensson B. Immunoglobulin subclass distribution and dynamics of Shigella-specific antibody responses in serum and stool samples in shigellosis. Infect Immun. 1995;63(5):2054–61. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC173264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hill AVS. THE IMMUNOGENETICS OF HUMAN INFECTIOUS DISEASES. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16(1):593–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.593 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liston A, Carr EJ, Linterman MA. Shaping Variation in the Human Immune System. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(10):637–46. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.08.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oberhelman RA, Kopecko DJ, Salazar-Lindo E, Gotuzzo E, Buysse JM, Venkatesan MM, et al. Prospective study of systemic and mucosal immune responses in dysenteric patients to specific Shigella invasion plasmid antigens and lipopolysaccharides. Infect Immun. 1991;59(7):2341–50. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC258016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kantele AM, Takanen R, Arvilommi H. Immune response to acute diarrhea seen as circulating antibody-secreting cells. J Infect Dis. 1988;158(5):1011–6. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rasolofo-Razanamparany V, Cassel-Beraud AM, Roux J, Sansonetti PJ, Phalipon A. Predominance of serotype-specific mucosal antibody response in Shigella flexneri-infected humans living in an area of endemicity. Infect Immun. 2001;69(9):5230–4. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5230-5234.2001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC98630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Robin G, Cohen D, Orr N, Markus I, Slepon R, Ashkenazi S, et al. Characterization and quantitative analysis of serum IgG class and subclass response to Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri 2a lipopolysaccharide following natural Shigella infection. J Infect Dis. 1997;175(5):1128–33. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li A, Zhao CR, Ekwall E, Lindberg AA. Serum IgG antibody responses to Shigella invasion plasmid-coded antigens detected by immunoblot. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(4):435–45. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Roy S, Das A, Biswas T. Antigenicity and antigenic relatedness of the outer membrane proteins of Shigella species. Microbios. 1993;79(318):55–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mukhopadhaya A, Mahalanabis D, Khanam J, Chakrabarti MK. Protective efficacy of oral immunization with heat-killed Shigella flexneri 2a in animal model: study of cross protection, immune response and antigenic recognition. Vaccine. 2003;21(21–22):3043–50. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Dot-EIA result of OMPs (clinical isolate SH080) probed with patient’s sera of S. sonnei and other related infection.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES