Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1984 Jun;3(6):1227–1234. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01957.x

Localization of the ribosomal genes in Caenorhabditis elegans chromosomes by in situ hybridization using biotin-labeled probes.

D G Albertson
PMCID: PMC557503  PMID: 6378619

Abstract

The site of the ribosomal gene cluster on embryonic metaphase chromosomes of Caenorhabditis elegans has been mapped by in situ hybridization using probe DNAs that have been nick-translated to incorporate biotin-labeled UTP. The hybridized probe DNA was detected by a double-layer fluorescent antibody technique. Since chromosomes from wild-type C. elegans embryos are indistinguishable, in situ hybridization was carried out with chromosomes from C. elegans strains carrying cytologically distinct translocation or duplication chromosomes in order to identify the right end of linkage group I as the site of the ribosomal genes. Chromosomes carrying a lethal mutation, let-209 I displayed smaller hybridization signals than wild-type, suggesting that these chromosomes carried a partial deficiency of the ribosomal gene cluster. A duplication of the ribosomal genes, eDp20(I;II) rescued let-209 homozygotes. Chromosomes carrying the alterations in the ribosomal genes were combined with mnT12(IV;X) to facilitate the mapping of genes in C. elegans by in situ hybridization. Linkage groups I and II are then labeled by the distinctive hybridization signals from the ribosomal probes, linkage groups IV and X are together distinguishable morphologically and linkage group V is labeled by hybridization to a 5S gene probe.

Full text

PDF
1227

Images in this article

1228Fig. 1.
on p.1228
1228Fig. 2.
on p.1228
1229Fig. 3.
on p.1229
1229Fig. 4.
on p.1229
1230Fig. 5.
on p.1230
1230Fig. 6.
on p.1230
1231Fig. 7.
on p.1231
1232Fig. 8.
on p.1232
1232Fig. 9.
on p.1232
1233Fig. 10.
on p.1233

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albertson D. G., Thomson J. N. The kinetochores of Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma. 1982;86(3):409–428. doi: 10.1007/BF00292267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Emmons S. W., Klass M. R., Hirsh D. Analysis of the constancy of DNA sequences during development and evolution of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1333–1337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Files J. G., Carr S., Hirsh D. Actin gene family of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol. 1983 Mar 5;164(3):355–375. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Files J. G., Hirsh D. Ribosomal DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jun 25;149(2):223–240. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90299-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henderson A. S. Cytological hybridization to mammalian chromosomes. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;76:1–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henikoff S., Meselson M. Transcription at two heat shock loci in Drosophila. Cell. 1977 Oct;12(2):441–451. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herman R. K., Kari C. K., Hartman P. S. Dominant X-chromosome nondisjunction mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):379–400. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herman R. K., Madl J. E., Kari C. K. Duplications in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):419–435. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Langer-Safer P. R., Levine M., Ward D. C. Immunological method for mapping genes on Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(14):4381–4385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.14.4381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Langer P. R., Waldrop A. A., Ward D. C. Enzymatic synthesis of biotin-labeled polynucleotides: novel nucleic acid affinity probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6633–6637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.6633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Livak K. J., Freund R., Schweber M., Wensink P. C., Meselson M. Sequence organization and transcription at two heat shock loci in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Nov;75(11):5613–5617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller L., Knowland J. Reduction of ribosomal RNA synthesis and ribosomal RNA genes in a mutant of Xenopus laevis which organizes only a partial nucleolus. II. The number of ribosomal RNA genes in animals of different nucleolar types. J Mol Biol. 1970 Nov 14;53(3):329–338. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90069-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ritossa F. M., Atwood K. C., Spiegelman S. A molecular explanation of the bobbed mutants of Drosophila as partial deficiencies of "ribosomal" DNA. Genetics. 1966 Sep;54(3):819–834. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.3.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L., Candido E. P., Beckenbach K. A., Nelson D. The linkage mapping of cloned restriction fragment length differences in Caenorabditis elegans. Mol Gen Genet. 1982;188(2):286–291. doi: 10.1007/BF00332689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sulston J. E., Brenner S. The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):95–104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES