Abstract
Background/Aims
Neurosarcoidosis is a rare condition with serious health consequences. However, little is known about clinical characteristics and outcome of neurosarcoidosis in the community setting.
Methods
Patients with neurosarcoidosis were identified from a previously described cohort of patients with incident sarcoidosis from Olmsted County, Minnesota, United States from 1976 – 2013 using individual medical record review. Data on clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome were collected.
Results
Neurological involvement by sarcoidosis occurred in 11 patients (3% of all patients with sarcoidosis). Cranial neuropathy was the most common type of neurological disease (5 patients; 45%) followed by peripheral neuropathy (3 patients; 27%) and meningitis (3 patients; 27%). CSF pleocytosis and elevated CSF protein levels were observed in patients with meningitis, intra-medullary spinal cord sarcoidosis, intra-cranial mass lesion and some patients with cranial neuropathy, but were normal in patients with peripheral neuropathy. All patients received high-dose glucocorticoids as initial treatment and almost all responded to this therapy. Relapse after glucocorticoid dose reduction necessitated subsequent treatment with steroid-sparing agents in 4 patients.
Conclusion
Neurosarcoidosis is an uncommon manifestation of sarcoidosis. Neurosarcoidosis manifestations generally responded well to high-dose glucocorticoids in the majority of patients, but relapse was common.
Keywords: Sarcoidosis, Neurosarcoidosis, Epidemiology, Outcome
Introduction
Sarcoidosis is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by the presence of non-caseating granuloma. The exact pathogenesis of sarcoidosis is not known but is believed to be a dysregulated immunologic response to environmental trigger(s) [1, 2]. The reported incidence of sarcoidosis ranges from 1 to 70 new cases per 100,000 person-years, depending on the ethnic background of the population [3-5]. Sarcoidosis can affect any organ with lung and mediastinal lymph node being the most frequently affected sites. Involvement of the nervous system by sarcoidosis is relatively uncommon with a reported prevalence of 4% to 9% [3, 6-8] but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The current study used a previously identified cohort of patients with sarcoidosis from Olmsted County, Minnesota (MN), United States (US), to characterize the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with neurosarcoidosis [9].
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study that identified potential cases of incident sarcoidosis from 1976 to 2013 from the medical record-linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) using the diagnosis codes related to sarcoid, sarcoidosis and non-caseating granuloma. The REP medical record-linkage system collects diagnostic codes of all clinical encounters (hospitalization, outpatient visit and emergency room visit) of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with local providers (the Mayo Clinic, the Olmsted Medical Center and their affiliated hospitals, local nursing homes and few private practitioners). Thus, virtually all clinically recognized cases of sarcoidosis in the community can be identified from the database. History, methodology and clinical application of the REP medical record-linkage system have been described in detail elsewhere [10].
Medical records of the identified cases were individually reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis which required the presence of non-caseating granuloma on histopathology, radiologic features of intrathoracic sarcoidosis, compatible clinical presentation and exclusion of other possible causes of granulomatous inflammation such as tuberculosis and fungal infection. The only exception to the histopathology requirement was stage I pulmonary sarcoidosis that required only the presence of symmetric bilateral hilar adenopathy on thoracic imaging studies after excluding other alternative diagnoses. Isolated extra-thoracic sarcoidosis (including isolated neurosarcoidosis) without pulmonary sarcoidosis was diagnosed by the presence of non-caseating granuloma, compatible clinical presentation and exclusion of other granulomatous diseases, similar to the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis. However, diagnosis of all cases of extra-thoracic sarcoidosis required histopathologic confirmation. Patients who were diagnosed with sarcoidosis prior to residency in Olmsted County (i.e., prevalent cases) were not included.
Confirmed cases of sarcoidosis were then reviewed for neurologic involvement. Data on demographic characteristics, neurological manifestations, imaging study of the brain/spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, laboratory investigations, treatment and outcome were collected. Follow-up was continued until death, migration out of system or April 1, 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic and the Olmsted Medical Center Institutional Review Boards and the need for inform consent was waived.
Result
Between 1976 and 2013, 345 residents of Olmsted County, MN were diagnosed with sarcoidosis. Demographics and clinical characteristics of this cohort were previously described in detail [9]. Neurological involvement was observed in 11 patients (3% of all patients with sarcoidosis; 95% confidence interval: 2-6%). Among these 11 patients, 55% were female, 73% Caucasian, 18% African-American and 9% Asian with average age of 44.8 years [standard deviation 10.7 years] at diagnosis) (table 1). Most patients fulfilled the criteria for probable neurosarcoidosis as proposed by Zajicek et al. [11]. A total of 3 patients fulfilled the criteria for definite neurosarcoidosis and 1 patient fulfilled the criteria for possible neurosarcoidosis. Cranial neuropathy was the most common type of neurological disease (5 patients; 45%) followed by peripheral neuropathy (3 patients; 27%) and meningitis (3 patients; 27%). Intra-medullary spinal cord sarcoidosis and intra-cranial mass lesion were present in 1 patient. Extra-neurologic involvement by sarcoidosis was also seen in all but 1 patient. Lung was by far the most commonly affected extra-neurologic site (73%) followed by skin (18%). Involvement of skin, joint, lacrimal gland and extra-thoracic lymph node was seen in 1 patient.
Table 1. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of patients with neurosarcoidosis in this study.
Case | Sex, and age (years) |
Duration of follow up (years) |
Neurological manifestations |
Neurological diagnosis |
Onset of neurological symptoms |
Other involved organs |
Imaging study at diagnosis |
CSF analysis at diagnosis | Serum ACE level |
Biopsy | Level of diagnosis* |
Treatment | Outcome | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cells (per mm3) |
Protein (mg/dL) |
Glucose | Oligo-clonal bands |
|||||||||||||
1 | M, 44 | 7.3 | Facial palsy | Cranial nerve VII | 6 years after the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung | Not done | Not done | Not done | Not done | Not done | Not done | Lung: non-caseating granulomas | Possible | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered a course of 1 week). | Good response. No recurrence after stopping prednisone. No residual neurological deficit. |
2 | F, 41 | 35.8 | Facial palsy and paresthesia in all 4 extremities | Cranial nerve VII neuropathy and peripheral neuropathy | 2 weeks before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung | Not done | Normal (2) | High (62) | Normal (52) | Not done | High | Lung: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered a course of 1.5 years). | Good response. No recurrence after stopping prednisone. No residual neurological deficit. |
3 | F, 55 | 14.3 | Facial palsy, ataxia and dysphonia | Cranial nerve VII neuropathy and intra-cerebellar mass | 2 weeks before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | None | MRI brain: Large solitary enhancing intra-cerebellar mass lesion | High (13; 99% L) | High (57) | Normal (79) | No | Normal | Intra-cerebellar mass lesion: non-caseating granulomas | Definite | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered a course of a year). | Good response but the mass recurred 6 months after stopping prednisone. |
Prednisone was reinitiated at 60 mg along with AZA but developed hepatitis. HCQ 400 mg daily was later added. | Good response. Able to taper off prednisone in 9 months. No recurrence. Remained on HCQ until death from lymphoma. No residual neurological deficit. |
|||||||||||||||
4 | M, 51 | 13.0 | Subacute painless visual loss left eye (VA 20/25) | Optic neuritis of left eye | 3 months before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung and extra-thoracic lymph node | MRI brain: Non-specific white matter lesions | High (11; 70% L) | High (65) | Normal (60) | No | Normal | Extra-thoracic lymph node: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | Prednisone (40 mg/day; tapered a course of a year). | Good response. No recurrence after stopping prednisone. Last eye exam showed VA of 20/20 both eyes. |
5 | F, 42 | 7.5 | Subacute painless visual loss both eyes (VA 20/40 right eye and 20/25 left eye) | Optic neuritis of both eyes | 8 years after the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung and skin | MRI brain: Enhancement and swelling of both optic nerves | Normal (1) | Normal (24) | Normal (53) | No | Normal | Lung: normal lung tissue Skin: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | IV methyl-prednisolone 1,000 mg IV for 5 days and prednisone at 60 mg/day were initiated | No response. VA continued to decline. |
Infliximab 5 mg/kg IV monthly and HCQ at 400 mg/day were added. | Good response. No recurrence after stopping infliximab at 6 months and prednisone at 12 months. Last eye exam showed VA of 20/25 right eye and 20/20 left eye. Remained on HCQ to date. |
|||||||||||||||
6 | M, 48 | 7.4 | Headache | Meningitis | 4 months before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Eye | MRI brain: Diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement | High (107; 91% L) | High (206) | Low (30) | Yes | Normal | Lepto-meninges: non-caseating granulomas | Definite | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered over 2 years). | Good response but meningitis recurred when prednisone tapered to 15-20 mg/day. |
MTX was added. | Still unable to taper prednisone lower than 15-20 mg/day. | |||||||||||||||
Currently on MMF. | Prednisone taper is underway. | |||||||||||||||
7 | M, 47 | 28.2 | Headache and ataxia | Meningitis with communicating hydrocephalus | 1 month before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung | CT brain: communicating hydrocephalus | High (37; 89% L) | High (130) | Normal (61) | No | High | Mediastinal lymph node: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered a course of a year). | Headache decreased but ataxia persisted. |
8 | F, 26 | 15.5 | Headache and fever | Meningitis | 1 month before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung and lacrimal gland | CT brain: normal | High (39; 85% L) | High (47) | Normal (49) | Not done | Normal | Lung: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | Prednisone (40 mg/day; tapered over 10 months). | Good response but meningitis recurred 5 month after stopping prednisone. |
Prednisone was reinitiated at 20 mg | Good response. Able to taper off prednisone in 9 months. No recurrence. No residual neurological deficit. | |||||||||||||||
9 | F, 44 | 5.3 | Mid-back pain and paresthesia around chest wall | Spinal cord sarcoidosis | 1 month before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung | MRI spinal cord: normal PET scan: moderate FDG avid activity within the spinal canal from T9-T12 | High (26; 89% L) | High (41) | Normal (52) | No | Normal | Lung: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered over 1.5 years). | Good response. No recurrence after stopping prednisone. No residual neurological deficit. |
10 | F, 65 | 4.1 | Weakness of all 4 extremities | Peripheral neuropathy | 22 years after the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Lung and joint | MRI brain and spinal cord: normal | Normal (1) | Normal (35) | Normal (47) | Not done | Normal | Lung: non-caseating granulomas | Probable | Prednisone (60 mg/day; tapered over 1 years). | Good response but the weakness recurred 1 month after stopping prednisone. |
Prednisone was reinitiated at 20 mg/day along with MMF 2 g/day. | Good response the weakness still recurred after stopping prednisone. Patient thereafter maintained on prednisone 10 mg/day and MMF 2 g/day until her death from MDS. |
|||||||||||||||
11 | M, 30 | 1.5 months | Decreased sensation of lateral aspect of left foot | Peripheral neuropathy | 4 years before the diagnosis of sarcoidosis | Skin | Not done | Normal (1) | Normal (29) | Normal (60) | No | Normal | Sural nerve: granulomatous endoneurial inflammation Skin: non-caseating granulomas |
Definite | Prednisone was initiated at 60 mg/day, the patient then migrated out of the county. No further follow-up information was available. | N.A. |
M, male; F, female; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computerized tomography; AZA, azathioprine; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MTX, methotrexate; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; N.A., not available; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; VA, visual acuity
Level of diagnosis per Zajicek et al.[11]
Neurological abnormalities were part of the presenting symptoms that led to the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in 7 of the 11 patients (64%). The median time from onset of neurological symptoms to diagnosis of sarcoidosis was 1 month (range 2 weeks to 4 months). Neurosarcoidosis occurred after the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was established in the other 4 patients. In 1 patient, neurosarcoidosis developed 22 years after the initial diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was performed in all but 1 patient. All of those with meningitis had CSF pleocytosis (cell count ranged from 37 to 107 cell/mm3, predominately lymphocytes; normal range 0 to 5 cells/mm3) and elevated CSF protein level (range 47 to 206 mg/dL; normal range 14 to 45 mg/dL) but hypoglycorrhachia was seen in only 1 patient. CSF pleocytosis and high CSF protein level were also observed in the patient with intra-medullary spinal cord sarcoidosis, the patient with intra-cranial mass lesion and some patients with cranial neuropathy, but not in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Oligoclonal bands were present in the CSF of only 1 patient (14% of testes patients). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) level was obtained in 10 patients and was elevated in 2 patients (20%).
All patients, except for 1 with isolated cranial nerve VII neuropathy, were treated with prolonged courses of glucocorticoids of 1 year or more. Almost all patients had a good response to initial treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids, often initially 1 gram methylprednisolone daily for 3 to 5 days, or prednisone, 1 mg/kg body weight as initial dose. However, relapse of neurosarcoidosis was common (4 patients) after the treatment was discontinued or the glucocorticoid dose was reduced. Several disease-modifying anti-rheumatic disease drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine, were used in this cohort as glucocorticoid-sparing agents after failure of glucocorticoids taper. The disease progressed in one patient despite high-dose glucocorticoids. Infliximab was added as rescue therapy with good response.
Discussion
Similar to previous studies, the prevalence of neurosarcoidosis was low in the current cohort (3% of all patients with sarcoidosis). However, the prevalence observed in this study is slightly lower than the reported prevalence of 4% to 9% from previous referral-based cohorts [3, 6-8]. The difference in methodology is possibly responsible for the lower prevalence as the current study utilized a population-based cohort of patients with sarcoidosis which may be able to capture a more complete spectrum of sarcoidosis in the community, unlike referral-based studies that may have selection bias and include more severe cases. The frequency of specific types of neurological abnormalities in this cohort was similar to previous studies with cranial neuropathy being the most common neurological abnormality, present in almost half of patients, followed by meningitis and peripheral neuropathy [12, 13].
The diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is often challenging as the neurologic abnormalities due to neurosarcoidosis can be seen in myriad of neurologic disorders. Demonstration of non-caseating granuloma in neural tissue remains the gold standard for the diagnosis. However, biopsy of the nervous system is often prohibitively invasive [13]. In addition, false negative results are common, with up to 30%-40% of brain parenchymal and meningeal biopsies failing to demonstrate the presence of non-caseating granuloma [14]. Zajicek et al. [11] proposed a set of criteria for diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis that allows a “probable” diagnosis to be made by biopsy of an extra-neurologic organ and evidence of inflammation in the central nervous system (from CSF analysis and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) without the requirement of nervous system histopathology. None of the patients in this cohort had isolated neurosarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis affected at least 1 additional organ in all patients in this cohort, with lung being the most commonly affected organ.
The high frequency of extra-neurologic sarcoidosis among patients with neurosarcoidosis has been consistently demonstrated in several cohorts [11, 13, 15]. Thus, careful physical examination and imaging study of the thorax should be performed to identify affected organs that may be eligible as alternative sites for biopsy. Histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis was available in all patients, including the biopsy of nervous system tissues in 3 patients. Identification of the extent of sarcoidosis is also important for monitoring of progression and response to treatment of the disease in each organ.
CSF analysis can be helpful to identify central nervous system inflammation, as most patients with neurosarcoidosis involving the central nervous system in this cohort had CSF pleocytosis and elevated CSF protein level. However, the degree of CSF abnormality was generally mild (highest protein level in this cohort was 206 mg/dL; highest cell count was 107 cell/mm3). In general, more profound CSF abnormalities including neutrophil-predominant pleocytosis and hypoglycorrhachia are not characteristics of neurosarcoidosis and are more suggestive of bacterial infection. Oligoclonal bands were detected in the CSF in only 1 patient in this cohort. This observation is line with the low prevalence of oligoclonal bands in other neurosarcoidosis cohorts [11, 16]. CSF analysis for oligoclonal bands may have a diagnostic value for differentiating neurosarcoidosis from multiple sclerosis with their presence is suggestive of multiple sclerosis whereas their absence is suggestive of neurosarcoidosis.
A high rate of relapse after initial response to high-dose glucocorticoids was observed in this cohort despite prolonged duration (1 to 2 years) of glucocorticoids treatment in almost all patients. A high recurrence rate was described in previous studies as well [16, 17]. Several DMARDs were used as steroid-sparing agents in the present study, but only 2 patients were able to discontinue glucocorticoids and both received hydroxychloroquine. Another study reported stabilization and/or improvement of neurological symptoms in 10 out of 12 patients who could not tolerate or elected not to take glucocorticoids and were treated with hydroxychloroquine mono-therapy [18]. Given the significant morbidity associated with relapse, use of concomitant DMARD therapy could be considered from the outset of treatment along with glucocorticoids, similar to treatment of other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus [19, 20]. The potential benefits of DMARD therapy must be weighed against their potential risks. Controlled studies are required to establish the role of combination therapy in neurosarcoidosis.
The efficacy of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against tumor-necrosis factor alpha, for pulmonary sarcoidosis has been demonstrated in randomized-controlled clinical trials [21, 22]. In this cohort, infliximab was successfully used in 1 patient as a rescue therapy after glucocorticoids failure. The efficacy of infliximab as a rescue therapy for neurosarcoidosis was previously described in a few case reports and case series [23, 24] but no controlled study is available.
The current study has some limitations related to its retrospective nature, as patients were not systematically evaluated for neurologic involvement of sarcoidosis. Therefore, the burden of unrecognized disease is not known. In addition, some recognized cases may not have been captured in this cohort if they were not correctly coded as sarcoidosis in the medical-linkage system. There was no standard follow-up or documentation protocol and, thus, some of the pertinent data were not available. Generalizability of the observations is another limitation as the clinical characteristics and outcome of sarcoidosis vary considerably between ethnic groups [5]. The population of Olmsted County, MN as well as the patients in this cohort are predominately of northern European ancestry.
Conclusion
Neurosarcoidosis is an uncommon manifestation of sarcoidosis that was seen in only 3% of patients in this cohort. Cranial neuropathy, meningitis and peripheral neuropathy were the most common types of neurological diseases. Neurosarcoidosis manifestations generally responded well to high-dose glucocorticoids in the majority of patients, but relapse was common.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This study was made possible using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, which is supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG034676, and CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Disclosure statement for all authors: The authors have no financial or non-financial potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Author contribution: Patompong Ungprasert: 1. Conception and design 2. Acquisition and interpretation of data 3. Drafting of the manuscript 4. Statistical analysis
Eric L. Matteson: 1. Conception and design 2. Acquisition and interpretation of data 3. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content 4. Statistical analysis 5. Supervision
Cynthia S. Crowson: 1. Conception and design 2. Analysis and interpretation of data 3. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content 4. Statistical analysis
References
- 1.Hu Y, Yibrehu B, Zabini D, Kuebler WM. Animal model of sarcoidosis. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;367:651–661. doi: 10.1007/s00441-016-2526-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sanchez M, Haimovic A, Prystowsky S. Sarcoidosis. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:389–416. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morimoto T, Azuma A, Abe S, Usuki J, Kudoh S, Sugisaki K, Oritsu M, Nukiwa T. Epidemiology of sarcoidosis in Japan. Eur Resp J. 2008;31:372–379. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00075307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cozier YC, Berman JS, Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Serlin DM, Rosenberg L. Sarcoidosis in black women in the United States: Data from the black women's health study. Chest. 2011;139:144–150. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rybicki BA, Major M, Popovich J, Jr, Maliarik MJ, Iannuzzi MC. Racial differences in sarcoidosis incidence: A 5-year study in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:234–241. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Judson MA, Boan AF, Lackland DT. The clinical course of sarcoidosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment in a large white and black cohort in the United States. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2012;29:119–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baughman RP, Teirstein AS, Judson MA, Rossman MD. Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis (ACCESS) research group: clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1885–1889. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2104046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharma SK, Mohan A, Guleria JS. Clinical characteristics, pulmonary function abnormalities and outcome of prednisolone treatment in 106 patients with sarcoidosis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001;49:697–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ungprasert P, Carmona EM, Utz JP, Ryu JH, Crowson CS, Matteson EL. A population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;191:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rocca WA, Yawn BP, St. Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Melton LJ., 3rd History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: Half a century of medical records linkage in a U.S. population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:1202–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zajicek JP, Scolding NJ, Foster O, Rovaris M, Evanson J, Moseley IF, Scadding JW, Thompson EJ, Chamoun V, Miller DH, McDonald WI, Mitchell D. Central nervous system sarcoidosis – diagnosis and management. Q J Med. 1999;92:103–117. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/92.2.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stern BJ, Krumholz A, Johns C, Scott P, Nissim J. Sarcoidosis and its neurological manifestations. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:909–917. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060080095022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nozaki K, Judson MA. Neurosarcoidosis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment. Presse Med. 2012;41:e331–348. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2011.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stern BJ, Aksamit A, Clifford D, Scott TF. Neurologic presentation of sarcoidosis. Neurol Clin. 2010;28:185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2009.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Allen RKA, Sellars RE, Sandstrom PA. A prospective study of 32 patients with neurosarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2003;20:118–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Joseph FG, Scolding NJ. Neurosarcoidosis: a study of 30 new cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:297–304. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.151977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Terushkin V, Stern BJ, Judson MA, Hagiwara M, Pramanik B, Sanchez M, Prystowsky S. Neurosarcoidosis. Presentations and management. Neurologist. 2010;16:2–15. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181c92a72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharma OP. Effectiveness of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in treating selected patients with sarcoidosis with neurological involvement. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1248–1254. doi: 10.1001/archneur.55.9.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cipriani P, Ruscitti P, Carubbi F, Liakouli V, Giacomelli R. Methotrexate: an old new drug in autoimmune disease. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014;10:1519–1530. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2014.962996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;6:411–419. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1269168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baughman RP, Drent M, Kavuru K, Judson MA, Costabel U, du Bois R, Albera C, Brutsche M, Davis G, Donohue JF, Müller-Quernheim J, Schlenker-Herceg R, Flavin S, Lo KH, Oemar B, Barnathan ES. Infliximab therapy in patients with chronic sarcoidosis and pulmonary involvement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:795–802. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200603-402OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rossman MD, Newman LS, Baughman RP, Teirstein A, Weinberger SE, Miller W, Jr, Sands BE. A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of infliximab in subjects with active pulmonary sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2006;23:201–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Toth C, Martin L, Morrish W, Coutts S, Parney I. Dramatic MRI improvement with refractory neurosarcoidosis treated with infliximab. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;116:259–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cohen Aubart F, Bouvry D, Galanaud D, Dehais C, Mathey G, Psimaras D, Haroche J, Pottier C, Hie M, Mathian A, Devilliers H, Nunes H, Valeyre D, Amoura Z. Long-term outcomes of refractory neurosarcoidosis treated with infliximab. J Neurol. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8444-9. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]