Abstract
DNA damage response has been characterized as an important mediator of senescence phenotypes induced by activated oncogenes in normal human cells. Depletion of intracellular deoxyribonucleotide pools has been recently recognized as one of the major causes for DNA damage in these cells. Cells undergoing oncogene-induced senescence display decreased expression of several rate-limiting enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of deoxyribonucleotides, including thymidylate synthase (TS) and ribonucleotide reductase (RR). Individual depletion of these enzymes leads to premature senescence. Reciprocally, ectopic expression of TS and RR or addition of deoxyribonucleosides resulted in suppression of senescence phenotypes in normal or tumor cells caused by overexpression of activated HRAS or depletion of C-MYC, respectively. Therefore, in the current chapter, we will describe the methodology for the quantitative measurement of nucleotide pools in senescent cells.
Introduction
Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) in normal cells is characterized by a set of intracellular processes ultimately resulting in suppression of proliferation of pre-malignant cells (1–3). Due to this feature, OIS is considered a major impediment to oncogenic transformation (4). Compelling data demonstrates that DNA damage response is the major factor contributing to OIS (5–7). For a long time, oncogene-induced oxidative stress and hyper-replication of genomic DNA (multiple firing of the same origin of replication) were considered the two major causes for DNA damage in oncogene-expressing senescent cells. For instance, it has been demonstrated that generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via HRASG12V-dependent induction of NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4) is an important mediator of HRASG12V-induced senescence (8). On the other hand, ectopic expression of activated HRAS in human fibroblasts caused multiple firing of the same replication origin of genomic DNA, which resulted in DNA replication fork-stalling, generation of single and double-stranded DNA breaks and ultimately, activation of the DNA damage response (7).
However, since then experimental evidence has been accumulated suggesting that suppression of nucleotide biosynthesis represents another major cause of DNA damage and OIS in normal and transformed cells. First, it has been demonstrated that upregulation of nucleotide metabolism is essential for proliferation promoting functions of oncoprotein C-MYC (9, 10). Genes encoding three major ratelimiting enzymes for nucleotide biosynthesis (thymidylate synthase (TS), inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 2 (IMPDH2) and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase 2 (PRPS2)) were identified as bonafide MYC targets (10). Moreover, proliferation of cells affected by shRNA-mediated depletion of C-MYC was partially restored by co-expression of cDNAs for these genes (10). In parallel, we demonstrated that upregulation of C-MYC is required for continuous suppression of OIS in melanocytic cells suggesting a functional connection between nucleotide metabolism and OIS (11, 12). This connection was further elaborated on in a study demonstrating the activation of the Rb-E2F pathway by HPV-16 E6 and E7 or the overexpression of cyclin E resulting in depletion of intracellular nucleotide levels and DNA damage (13). Furthermore, the overexpression of C-MYC upregulated intracellular nucleotide pools and decreased replication-dependent DNA damage (13).
In follow-up studies, we and others established that depletion of deoxyribonucleotide pools plays a causative role in induction of DNA damage in cells undergoing OIS (14–16). Overexpression of different combinations of cDNAs for enzymes required for deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis (TS, and ribonucleotide reductase subunits M1 and M2 [RRM1 and RRM2]) resulted in elevation of dNTP pools originally depleted by ectopic expression of HRASG12V in normal human fibroblasts (15). Furthermore, fibroblasts overexpressing the above enzymes demonstrated a substantial reduction in HRASG12V-dependent senescence-associated phenotypes, including DNA damage, expression of senescence-associated enescence-associated phenotypes, includi (15). Of note, proliferation arrest caused in human fibroblasts by serum deprivation (quiescence) also resulted in depletion of dNTP pools; however, no DNA damage was detected (14). Accordingly, overexpression of the same enzymes was insufficient in promoting proliferation of serum-deprived fibroblasts, suggesting that, unlike quiescence, OIS occurs in cells where DNA replication is activated in the presence of depleted dNTP pools (15). Indeed, generation of DNA strand breaks leading to activation of DNA damage response has been described as a major cytotoxicity pathway of several anti-neoplastic agents inhibiting nucleotide metabolism. These agents include inhibitors of TS (5-Fluorouracil) and RR (hydroxyurea) (17). Genetic inhibition of TS and RR also induces DNA damage and senescence-associated phenotypes in normal human fibroblasts (15). Therefore, under conditions of low nucleotide levels, an increase in the number of replication forks (due to overexpression of activated HRAS) will result in generation of higher levels of DNA damage than under normal conditions.
The molecular mechanisms governing induction or re-activation of senescence programs in tumor cells still remain poorly understood. Downregulation of oncoprotein C-MYC has been identified as one such mechanism (11, 18). Interestingly, depletion of C-MYC in tumor cells induces senescence phenotypes similar to those caused by depletion or pharmaceutical inhibition of TS or RR (11, 12). Moreover, senescence caused by downregulation of C-MYC in tumor cells can be abrogated by overexpression of TS and RR cDNAs; and similar effects can be achieved by supplementing cell media with deoxyribonucleosides (12). Additionally, exogenous deoxyribonucleosides are able to suppress senescence caused by activated HRAS in normal cells (15, 16). The latter observation may be important for prevention or early treatment of certain types of tumors such as melanomas. Approximately 30 to 50% of melanomas originate from benign melanocytic nevi, aggregates of senescent melanocytes most commonly expressing mutant BRAFV600E (~60%) or NRASQ61R (~20%) (19, 20). Therefore, melanoma must develop mechanisms overcoming OIS and upregulation of nucleotide metabolism appears to be one of the most likely candidates.
In this chapter, we will describe a comprehensive methodology for measuring the intracellular amounts of ribo- and deoxyribonucleotides in control cells and cells undergoing HRASG12V-induced senescence; however, the same methodology could be applied to any senescent cells.
2. Materials
2.1 Cells and growth media
WI38 cells (normal human lung fibroblasts).
HEK293T cells (human embryonal kidney cells transformed with the SV40 large T antigen).
DMEM supplemented with antibiotic-antimycotic and 10% fetal bovine serum).
2.2. Reagents and materials for lentiviral gene transfer
SuperFect® transfection reagent
0.45 µm syringe filters
2.3 Plasmids
FG12 lentiviral vector.
FG12-HRASG12V was generated by re-cloning HRASG12V cDNA from pcDNA3-H-Ras_V12 plasmid into FG12 lentiviral vector.
pCMV-VSV-G
pCMV delta R8.2.
2.4 Reagents for Nucleotide Extraction (see Note 1
Perchloric Acid: 70% reagent grade. Dilute with HPLC-grade water to 0.8 N.
Potassium Hydroxide: Dissolve potassium hydroxide in HPLC-grade water to make 10 N and 1 N stocks.
2.5. Reagents for Boronate Chromatography
Ammonium bicarbonate buffer, 1 M, pH 8.9: dissolve ammonium bicarbonate in HPLC-grade water, bring the pH to 8.9. Use this stock to make 0.05 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.9.
Magnesium chloride, 0.3 M: dissolve magnesium chloride in HPLC-grade water. Use an aliquot of this stock to make a stock of 0.015 M magnesium chloride.
Borate buffer, pH 8.9: dissolve borate buffer in HPLC-grade water and pH to 8.9.
Hydrate Affi-Gel Boronate Affinity Chromatography gel in 0.05 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.9, for at least 15 min with several changes of buffer. Pack the hydrated gel suspension into a 1 cc tuberculin syringe fitted with a frit (to retain the gel), and pack to a height of approximately 0.9 mL. Connect a 10 mL syringe onto the top of the Affi-Gel column as a buffer reservoir. Equilibrate the column with at least 10 mL of 0.05 M ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.9, with 0.015 M magnesium chloride. Run at least 10 mL of 0.1 M borate buffer, pH 8.9, through the column. If not using immediately, store the column at 4°C in 0.1 M borate buffer, and wrap tightly with parafilm.
2.6 HPLC buffers and solvents
HPLC-grade methanol
-
HPLC buffers should be made with HPLC-grade ammonium phosphate and dissolved in HPLC-grade water.
0.005 M ammonium phosphate, brought to a pH 2.8 with concentrated phosphoric acid
0.75 M ammonium phosphate, brought to a pH of 3.6 with concentrated phosphoric acid
After preparing the buffers, they should be filtered through a glass or Teflon filter-degasser apparatus with a 0.45 µm filter under vacuum (the apparatus has an arm to attach to the vacuum arm on a lab water faucet). This type of filter apparatus is available from several suppliers. We use a teflon filter-degasser with a cap that screws onto a standard 4 L solvent bottle. These bottles can then be used for buffer storage, or the HPLC buffer line can be placed directly into the bottle. If you choose to transfer the buffer to another glass container, pour the buffer in carefully to limit aeration (see Note 1).
EDTA: Prepare 0.1 M stock of EDTA in HPLC-grade water. Filter through a 0.22 µm filter housing.
2.7 Preparation of NTP standards
Make individual stocks of high purity rNTPs (CTP, UTP, ATP and GTP) and dNTPs (dCTP, dTTP, dATP and dGTP) separately in HPLC-grade water. Check UV absorbance for each nucleotide to ensure you have the correct concentration. (see Note 2).
Make a 10 µM stock solution for the four rNTPs, and a 10 µM stock for the four dNTPs.
2.8 HPLC Equipment
Gradient HPLC system equipped to run at least four different solvents with a 2 mL injection loop.
UV detector for gradient HPLC (photodiode array detector
Partisil 10 SAX analytical column (quaternary ammonium ion), 25 cm × 4.6 mm
Anion exchange guard column and housing
Silica pack and housing
3. Methods
3.1 Generation of human fibroblasts undergoing oncogene-induced senescence
Day 1. Plate
3.2 Extraction of nucleotides from cells
Perform all procedures with ice-cold reagents, and keep samples on ice during the entire process.
Harvest cells from culture by trypsinization, then dilute cells in complete growth medium (with serum) to stop trypsinization. Pipet cells up and down a few times to obtain a single cell suspension. Count an aliquot of cells (Coulter electronic particle counter or hemocytometer) for calculation of total number of cells extracted. Keep cells for extraction on ice. (see Note 3).
Centrifuge cells at 250 × g, 4°C, for 5 min (~1200 rpm on a centrifuge of ~16 cm radius).
Aspirate supernatant from the cell pellet. Remove as much of the cell growth medium in the supernatant as possible and discard. Keep cell pellet on ice.
Place conical tube with cell pellet on vortex, then rapidly add ice-cold 0.5 mL HPLC-grade water. Use an Eppendorf pipetter to expel water onto the cell pellet while vortexing to help resuspend cells. Vortex well to resuspend cell pellet.
While continuing to vortex cells, rapidly add 0.5 mL of ice-cold 0.8 N perchloric acid. Continue to vortex for a few seconds to mix contents. Return cell extract to ice for 5 min.
Centrifuge cell extract at 250 × g, 4°C, for 5 min.
Carefully remove supernatant from pellet and place in a fresh centrifuge tube. Keep supernatant at 4°C. Discard pellet.
Neutralize supernatant with ~40 µL 10 N KOH while vortexing. Measure approximate pH by pipetting 1 µL of supernatant onto pH paper. If the pH is less than 6, add aliquots of 1 µL each of 1 N KOH to bring final pH to ~ 7 on pH paper.
Centrifuge neutralized extract at 400 × g, 4°C, for 5 min. Remove supernatant to fresh tube. Freeze at −20°C until analysis. The extracts should be quite stable when stored frozen at neutral pH. Discard precipitate.
3.3 Separation of dNTPs from rNTPs by boronate chromatography
Bring the boronate columns to room temperature.
Equilibrate the boronate columns with at least 10 mL of 0.05 M ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.9.
To 0.9 mL of cell extract, add 50 µL of 1 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.9, and 50 µL of 0.3 M magnesium chloride. Vortex well.
Load 0.2 mL of the buffered cell extract to the top of a boronate column; discard the eluate. Load the remaining 0.8 mL onto the top of the boronate column and collect the eluate. When the sample has fully penetrated into the column matrix, add 1 mL of 0.05 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.9, with 0.015 M magnesium chloride and collect the eluate. The 1.8 mL eluate contains the dNTPs; place on ice immediately and save for HPLC analysis.
To remove the rNTPs from the boronate column, elute with at least 10 mL of 0.1 M borate buffer, pH 8.9.
Just prior to HPLC analysis, bring the pH of the dNTP eluate to ~2 to 3 with phosphoric acid. Keep the acidified eluate on ice, and analyze promptly. (see Note 4).
3.4 Separation of nucleotides by HPLC
All solvents and buffers should be HPLC grade. The HPLC column and buffers are run at room temperature. All samples should be stored on ice until they are injected onto the HPLC column.
Column setup: the SAX guard column should be inserted in its housing and attached to the SAX analytical column. The silica pack is inserted upstream from the guard and analytical column, in the tubing that carries the mixed buffer solution, so that the mobile phase will be saturated with silica prior to running on the analytical column.
The SAX column should be stored in 100% methanol. To prepare the column for running NTPs, the mobile phase must first be changed from methanol to water. Use a linear gradient from 100% methanol to 100% water over 30 min at 1 mL/min. Set the UV detector to the desired wavelength for your samples.
Continue to run 100% water through the column for another 30 min at 1 mL/min. Increase flow rate to 2 mL/min.
Change the mobile phase to 50% 0.005 M, pH 2.8, and 50% 0.75 M, pH 3.6, ammonium phosphate buffer and equilibrate the column for 15 min.
Inject 2 mL of 0.1 M EDTA. Run a linear gradient from 50% 0.75 M buffer to 100% 0.75 M buffer over 15 min, then continue to elute the EDTA with 100% 0.75 M buffer for another 15 min.
Run a linear gradient from 100% 0.75 M buffer to 20% 0.75 M and 80% 0.005 M buffer over 10 min. Equilibrate column for at least 30 min.
Inject 0.5 nmol dNTP standards and 0.25 nmol rNTP standards and elute with a linear gradient of 80% 0.005 M and 20% 0.75 M buffer to 20% 0.005 M and 80% 0.75 M buffer over 30 min, then continue to elute at this buffer concentration for another 5 min. The nucleoside triphosphates will elute between ~18 and 30 min. (see Note 5).
Run a linear gradient from 20% 0.005 M and 80% 0.75 M buffer to 80% 0.005 M and 20% 0.75 M over 10 min to return the column to the starting buffer concentration.
Allow the column to equilibrate for at least 30 min in between runs.
For sample analysis, centrifuge samples at 400 × g, 4°C, for 5 min to remove any precipitate. Carefully pipet the amount of sample needed for analysis. Inject samples using the same conditions as in steps 8 and 9.
After several runs, the baseline will begin to increase due to impurities in the buffers. Run 2 mL of EDTA using the gradient conditions in steps 6 and 7 above to decrease the baseline absorbance. Make sure to equilibrate the column well after EDTA until the absorbance has stably returned to baseline.
To store the column, change the mobile phase from buffer to water using a linear gradient from 80% 0.005 M and 20% 0.75 M to 100% water over 15 min at 2 mL/min. Equilibrate column in 100% water for at least 30 min, 2 mL/min. Change the mobile phase from 100% water to 100% methanol over 30 min at 1 mL/min. Equilibrate for at least 30 min in 100% methanol, 1 mL/min, before shutting off the machine. Be careful not to change the mobile phase abruptly from methanol to ammonium phosphate buffer, as the buffer will precipitate and clog the HPLC.
Integrate the area under the curve for the NTP standards, and then calculate the integrator units/nmol based on the known amount of each standard injected. The amount of dNTPs in each sample is then calculated based on the integrator units/nmol of the appropriate standard dNTP.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by NIH grants CA120244 and CA190533 (MAN), CA083081 (DSS).
Footnotes
HPLC grade water is more reliably free of UV-absorbing impurities than lab deionized or Millipore-purified water. All flasks and beakers used to prepare and store buffers should be used for HPLC buffers only. Immediately after use, rinse all equipment thoroughly with lab deionized water followed by a final rinse with HPLC grade water, then air dried in a clean area. If the containers need to be washed with soap, afterward rinse thoroughly with lab deionized water, and then use a final rinse with HPLC-grade water.
We check the purity of each freshly made nucleotide standard by running it on HPLC against standards of known concentration.
Cells for extraction should be centrifuged in a conical (not a round-bottom) tube so that the cells will pellet well to the bottom, and there will be better recovery of the supernatant during extraction. A 15 to 50 mL plastic conical tube works well, depending on the number of cells to be extracted. For most cultured tumor cell lines, dNTPs can be accurately measured in 10 to 20 million cells.
Add the magnesium chloride to the ammonium bicarbonate buffer just before using it. Precipitates will form with time in this buffer combination and impeded the flow through the boronate column and HPLC. Flow through the boronate columns is slow. You may wish to prepare several boronate columns so that you can run several samples simultaneously. The boronate chromatography procedure will remove 99.9% of the rNTPs, with >95% recovery of the dNTPs. Each column can process dozens of samples. When the column needs to be replaced, you will note an increase in the amount of rNTPs in the dNTP eluate during the HPLC analysis.
If any of the dNTPs coelute with the rNTPs or do not achieve baseline resolution, try altering the pH of the 0.75 M ammonium phosphate buffer in increments of 0.1 pH units. Decreasing the pH will increase the area between CTP and UTP, whereas increasing the pH will increase the area between ATP and GTP at the expense of decreasing the CTP and UTP separation. In most cases, there are no detectable rNTPs when the boronate-purified dNTP eluate is analyzed by HPLC. However, depending on the number of cells analyzed and the condition of the column, there may be slight contamination of the dNTP fraction with rNTPs. Thus it is necessary to make sure that you can separate the rNTPs from the dNTPs by HPLC analysis.
References
- 1.Courtois-Cox S, Jones SL, Cichowski K. Many roads lead to oncogene-induced senescence. Oncogene. 2008;27(20):2801–2809. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bansal R, Nikiforov MA. Pathways of oncogene-induced senescence in human melanocytic cells. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(14):2782–2788. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.14.12551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bianchi-Smiraglia A, Nikiforov MA. Controversial aspects of oncogene-induced senescence. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(22):4147–4151. doi: 10.4161/cc.22589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mooi WJ, Peeper DS. Oncogene-induced cell senescence--halting on the road to cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(10):1037–1046. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra062285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bartkova J, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;434(7035):864–870. doi: 10.1038/nature03482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bartkova J, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature. 2006;444(7119):633–637. doi: 10.1038/nature05268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Di Micco R, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature. 2006;444(7119):638–642. doi: 10.1038/nature05327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weyemi U, Dupuy C. The emerging role of ROS-generating NADPH oxidase NOX4 in DNA-damage responses. Mutat Res. 2012;751(2):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu YC, et al. Global regulation of nucleotide biosynthetic genes by c-Myc. PloS one. 2008;3(7):e2722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mannava S, et al. Direct role of nucleotide metabolism in C-MYC-dependent proliferation of melanoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(15):2392–2400. doi: 10.4161/cc.6390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhuang D, et al. C-MYC overexpression is required for continuous suppression of oncogene-induced senescence in melanoma cells. Oncogene. 2008;27(52):6623–6634. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mannava S, et al. PP2A-B56alpha controls oncogene-induced senescence in normal and tumor human melanocytic cells. Oncogene. 2012;31(12):1484–1492. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bester AC, et al. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell. 2011;145(3):435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mannava S, et al. Ribonucleotide reductase and thymidylate synthase or exogenous deoxyribonucleosides reduce DNA damage and senescence caused by C-MYC depletion. Aging. 2012 doi: 10.18632/aging.100512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mannava S, et al. Depletion of deoxyribonucleotide pools is an endogenous source of DNA damage in cells undergoing oncogene-induced senescence. The American journal of pathology. 2013;182(1):142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aird KM, et al. Suppression of nucleotide metabolism underlies the establishment and maintenance of oncogene-induced senescence. Cell reports. 2013;3(4):1252–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yarbro JW. Mechanism of action of hydroxyurea. Semin Oncol. 1992;19(3 Suppl 9):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu CH, et al. Cellular senescence is an important mechanism of tumor regression upon c-Myc inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(32):13028–13033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701953104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pollock PM, et al. High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi. Nat Genet. 2003;33(1):19–20. doi: 10.1038/ng1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Curtin JA, et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(20):2135–2147. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
