Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2017 Jul 11;175(1):392–411. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01509

Enhanced Secondary- and Hormone Metabolism in Leaves of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Medicago truncatula1,[OPEN]

Lisa Adolfsson a,2, Hugues Nziengui a,2, Ilka N Abreu b,3, Jan Šimura c,3, Azeez Beebo a,3, Andrei Herdean a, Jila Aboalizadeh a, Jitka Široká c, Thomas Moritz b, Ondřej Novák c, Karin Ljung b, Benoît Schoefs d, Cornelia Spetea a,4
PMCID: PMC5580739  PMID: 28698354

Mycorrhization and phosphate fertilization share cytokinin-improved shoot growth, while enhanced abscisic acid biosynthesis and jasmonate-regulated secondary metabolism are specific to mycorrhization.

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM) are the most common symbiotic associations between a plant’s root compartment and fungi. They provide nutritional benefit (mostly inorganic phosphate [Pi]), leading to improved growth, and nonnutritional benefits, including defense responses to environmental cues throughout the host plant, which, in return, delivers carbohydrates to the symbiont. However, how transcriptional and metabolic changes occurring in leaves of AM plants differ from those induced by Pi fertilization is poorly understood. We investigated systemic changes in the leaves of mycorrhized Medicago truncatula in conditions with no improved Pi status and compared them with those induced by high-Pi treatment in nonmycorrhized plants. Microarray-based genome-wide profiling indicated up-regulation by mycorrhization of genes involved in flavonoid, terpenoid, jasmonic acid (JA), and abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis as well as enhanced expression of MYC2, the master regulator of JA-dependent responses. Accordingly, total anthocyanins and flavonoids increased, and most flavonoid species were enriched in AM leaves. Both the AM and Pi treatments corepressed iron homeostasis genes, resulting in lower levels of available iron in leaves. In addition, higher levels of cytokinins were found in leaves of AM- and Pi-treated plants, whereas the level of ABA was increased specifically in AM leaves. Foliar treatment of nonmycorrhized plants with either ABA or JA induced the up-regulation of MYC2, but only JA also induced the up-regulation of flavonoid and terpenoid biosynthetic genes. Based on these results, we propose that mycorrhization and Pi fertilization share cytokinin-mediated improved shoot growth, whereas enhanced ABA biosynthesis and JA-regulated flavonoid and terpenoid biosynthesis in leaves are specific to mycorrhization.


Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi colonize the root system of over 80% of land plants through the development of an extensive hyphal network. AM fungi predominantly belong to the phylum Glomeromycota (Gehrig et al., 1996; Schussler et al., 2001). They enhance water uptake and mineral nutrition (mostly inorganic phosphate [Pi]) of the host plant, which, in return, provides photosynthates to the fungus through hyphal structures called arbuscules (Baier et al., 2010; Doidy et al., 2012). The major advantage to plants is enhanced biomass production in a Pi-limiting environment (Rooney et al., 2009; Adolfsson et al., 2015), although some studies reported a lack of positive effects on biomass or Pi status in AM plants (Smith et al., 2011; Schweiger et al., 2014b). Moreover, AM fungi provide nonnutritional benefits to the host, including resistance against pathogens and pests as well as tolerance to abiotic stress (Nadeem et al., 2014). These benefits make mycorrhization an attractive alternative to the use of costly fertilizers and harmful pesticides, which are incompatible with environmentally and economically sustainable development.

Phosphorous is a critical element for plant growth. Pi is the form taken up by the plant from the soil, where it can be poorly available owing to its low concentration and/or to its low solubility when bound to iron, aluminum, or calcium (Schachtman et al., 1998). This situation can be overcome by the interaction between the plant’s root system and AM fungi, which accommodate an effective pathway, alternative to the direct root-epidermis uptake, by which soil Pi is absorbed in large amounts by the fungus and delivered to root cortical cells (Smith et al., 2011). However, some studies have suggested that the contribution of the AM-related Pi uptake pathway can be hidden due to the repression of direct uptake (Smith et al., 2004; Schnepf et al., 2008). In these cases, subsequent changes in AM plants cannot be attributed entirely to an improved Pi content.

During the beginning of the last decade, pioneer transcriptomic studies revealed significant hints of the molecular basis of changes induced in mycorrhized roots. Changes were reported in the pathways related to cell wall modification, protein degradation, plant defense, and primary, secondary, and hormone metabolism in mycorrhized roots of Medicago truncatula (Journet et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2003; Hohnjec et al., 2005; Siciliano et al., 2007; Schliemann et al., 2008), Oryza sativa (Güimil et al., 2005), Lotus japonicas (Deguchi et al., 2007; Guether et al., 2009), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Fiorilli et al., 2009; López-Ráez et al., 2010). The alterations in various types of metabolism are important for the establishment of the symbiosis and/or of interest for either of the partners, as exemplified below. Plant-synthesized sugars are transported to roots and supplied to the fungal symbiont. Flavonoids are thought to stimulate hyphal growth and branching (Scervino et al., 2005). Similarly, oxylipins regulate AM colonization and development (Isayenkov et al., 2005; Stumpe et al., 2005; León Morcillo et al., 2012). Finally, the coordinated action of auxins and strigolactones impacts root architecture (Cheng et al., 2013), whereas abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA) are well known for priming tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress (Luo et al., 2009; Song et al., 2014).

Although AM symbiosis is restricted to the root, alterations also occur in the shoot, suggesting the existence of signaling pathways responsible for the induction of systemic responses throughout the plant (Cameron et al., 2013). Hormones involved in plant growth (auxins, cytokinins [CKs], and strigolactones) and in stress responses (ethylene, ABA, JA, and SA) are signals thought to mediate alterations in the roots as well as in the shoots of AM plants (Miransari et al., 2014).

M. truncatula is a well-established model plant for legume genomics (Cook, 1999). It has been broadly used for studies of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic changes induced by AM symbiosis in either roots or leaves (Liu et al., 2007; Schliemann et al., 2008; Abdallah et al., 2014; Schweiger et al., 2014b; Daher et al., 2017). Previous microarray-based transcriptional analyses in leaves of M. truncatula during AM symbiosis revealed systemic induction of genes involved in plant defense (Liu et al., 2007). Phenolic compounds such as flavonoids and triterpenoids of the saponin type are well-known major groups of secondary metabolites in leaves of M. truncatula (Gholami et al., 2014), but it is not clear how their production is affected by mycorrhization. Furthermore, AM-induced changes in secondary metabolism that are not driven by improved Pi status have not been investigated in M. truncatula.

In this study, we undertook a combination of microarray-based gene expression, metabolomic, and hormone analyses in leaves of M. truncatula plants in symbiosis with the AM fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and compared the observed alterations with those in Pi-treated nonmycorrhized plants. Using previously established conditions (Adolfsson et al., 2015), we could distinguish the specific effects of mycorrhization (i.e. not driven by Pi status) from those of Pi fertilization. We show that changes in secondary metabolites in leaves of AM plants correlate with the transcriptional regulation of related biosynthetic pathways. These modifications coincide with the specific modulation by mycorrhization of ABA biosynthesis and JA-regulated secondary metabolism. As common modifications of mycorrhization and Pi fertilization in leaves, we found the down-regulation of iron homeostasis genes and enhanced production of CKs, resulting in improved shoot growth.

RESULTS

Experimental Design to Dissect the Effects of Mycorrhization and Pi Fertilization

In this work, we cultivated M. truncatula with fungal inoculum (AM plants), mock inoculum (control plants), or mock inoculum treated with 5 mm Pi (Pi plants) under previously established conditions (Adolfsson et al., 2015). Representative photographs of control, AM-, and Pi-treated plants are shown in Supplemental Figure S1 at 4 weeks post inoculation (wpi), when the degree of mycorrhization and the arbuscular abundance in AM plants were, on average, 72% and 51%, respectively (Table I; Supplemental Table S1). At this age, the AM symbiosis significantly increased shoot biomass as compared with the control without affecting the concentration of total P (expressed per shoot dry weight; Table I; Supplemental Table S1). In some experiments, we also included 1 mm Pi; however, this concentration appeared to be insufficient to induce a significantly high total P concentration in the shoot, whereas the biomass was only slightly higher than in control and AM plants (Supplemental Table S1), making it inappropriate to assess the effect of Pi fertilization. In 5 mm Pi-treated plants, the shoot total P concentration was significantly higher than in the control and AM plants (Table I; Supplemental Table S1), in agreement with our previous observations (Adolfsson et al., 2015). We also determined the concentration of soluble P (Pi) in shoots as well as in leaves and found that it followed a similar pattern to the total P (i.e. similar concentration in control and AM plants and significantly higher in the 5 mm Pi-treated plants; Supplemental Table S1). These experimental conditions allowed us to distinguish the specific effects of mycorrhization from those common with Pi fertilization in shoots of M. truncatula.

Table I. Root mycorrhization, shoot dry weight, and total P concentration.

Parameter Control AM Pi
Degree of mycorrhization (%) 0 72 ± 7 0
Arbuscular abundance (%) 0 51 ± 3 0
Shoot dry weight (g) 0.33 ± 0.04 0.50 ± 0.03* 0.60 ± 0.13**
Shoot total P (mg P g−1 dry weight ) 1.5 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.3 13.2 ± 2.1***

M. truncatula plant material was harvested 4 wpi from control plants, plants infected with R. irregularis (AM), or plants treated with 5 mm Pi (Pi). Values are averages ± sd of three independent experiments, with four to six plants used in each experiment. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treatments and the control (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05 [*], P < 0.01 [**], and P < 0.001 [***]; GraphPad Prism).

AM Symbiosis Induces Systemic Transcriptional Changes in Leaves Largely Different from Pi Fertilization

To advance our understanding of the molecular basis of AM-improved shoot growth, we carried out a microarray-based gene expression profiling in leaves from control, AM-, and Pi-treated M. truncatula plants at 4 wpi using a 60,000-feature oligonucleotide array. We considered to be significantly regulated only those genes showing a transcript ratio of treatment versus control with a threshold of 2 (Student’s t test P value of 0.01 and false-positive error correction Q of 0.05), calculated using the false discovery rate method of Benjamin and Hochberg (1995). The RNA microarray data set from leaves of AM plants exhibited 297 significantly regulated genes as compared with the leaves of control plants (Fig. 1A). Among them, 183 genes were up-regulated (Supplemental Table S2), while 114 were down-regulated (Supplemental Table S3). A rough analysis of these genes revealed 143 whose predicted proteins are already annotated (http://plantgrn.noble.org/LegumeIP; Li et al., 2012). Through in silico searches in public databases using gene symbols (http://www.genome.jp/) and primary accession numbers (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/unigene/) as well as through EST BLAST searching (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), we could assign a molecular function to predicted proteins of an additional 68 genes differentially regulated in AM leaves. A total of 86 genes encode proteins with either a yet uncharacterized function or without a known homolog and, therefore, were listed as unknown function/no homology. The most remarkable changes among AM-regulated genes were observed for those coding for a protein with unknown function (76-fold up-regulated; Supplemental Table S2) and for a vacuolar iron transporter/Nodulin-like protein (83-fold down-regulated; Supplemental Table S3). Pi treatment induced a significant transcript ratio (ratio > 2, P < 0.01, Q < 0.05) for 401 genes (Fig. 1A): 141 genes were up-regulated (Supplemental Table S4), whereas 260 genes displayed decreased transcript levels (Supplemental Table S5). The gene with the highest up-regulation (19-fold) encodes a mannitol transporter, whereas the strongest repressed (60-fold) was a Pi starvation-inducible gene.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Overview of AM- and Pi-regulated genes in M. truncatula leaves. RNAs were extracted from leaves of M. truncatula plants inoculated with the fungus R. irregularis (AM) or fertilized with Pi. Significantly regulated genes have a transcript ratio of at least 2 and Q < 0.05 as compared with control plants. A, Venn diagram of common and specific genes regulated by AM and Pi treatments. B, Distribution of AM- and Pi-regulated genes into functional categories according to Journet et al. (2002). Values to the right in red and blue represent the proportion of genes in each functional category for AM and Pi treatment, respectively.

When comparing gene expression profiles, 32 genes were found to be regulated by both AM symbiosis and Pi treatment, among which 21 were coregulated and 11 were conversely regulated (Fig. 1A; Supplemental Table S6). In each case, this represents about 5% of the total numbers of regulated genes in AM and Pi plants (297 and 401, respectively), suggesting that only a minor proportion of genes (and pathways) are affected by both treatments, whereas most genes (and pathways) altered by AM symbiosis are different from those altered by the Pi treatment.

Transcriptional Changes by AM Symbiosis and Pi Fertilization Involve Diverse Biological Processes

To get an overview of the functional relevance of transcriptional changes in leaves of AM and Pi plants, we conducted a functional process enrichment analysis through manual inspection and annotation of putative proteins according to Journet et al. (2002). Fifteen functional classes were identified within both sets of AM- and Pi-regulated genes, with the class of unknown function/no homology being the most represented (Fig. 1B). For genes coding for proteins with a known function, the most represented functional classes in AM plants stand for secondary and hormone metabolism (16.8%), gene expression and RNA metabolism (10.4%), primary metabolism (5.4%), and defense and cell rescue (6.4%). In leaves of Pi-treated plants, gene expression and RNA metabolism (13.2%), secondary and hormone metabolism (8.2%), membrane transport (3.7%), primary metabolism (6.2%), and defense and cell rescue (6%) are the most represented classes. Notably, shared classes such as primary, secondary, and hormone metabolism and defense and cell rescue were dominated by up-regulated genes in AM and repressed genes in Pi-treated plants (Fig. 1B).

To confirm the microarray results, we carried out a quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis of 14 genes selected from various functional categories using RNA samples from the same experiment as the microarray as well as from an independent experiment (Supplemental Table S1). Overall, the results are in good agreement with the microarray-based gene expression analysis (Supplemental Table S7).

AM Symbiosis and Pi Fertilization Differently Regulate Genes Involved in the Biosynthesis of Phenylpropanoid Derivatives

From the list of up- and down-regulated genes in AM plants (Supplemental Tables S2 and S3), we selected genes belonging to the same metabolic pathway. One of the most represented was phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, with enzymes coded by 10 AM-up-regulated genes (Table II). 4-Coumarate-CoA ligase5-like (4CL) is involved in early steps of this pathway, whereas dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR) and leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX; also called anthocyanidin synthase) are key enzymes in later steps of this pathway, yielding anthocyanins (Gholami et al., 2014). The other seven enzymes, namely caffeate 3-O-methyltransferase, isoflavonoid glycosyltransferase, isoflavonoid malonyl transferase, isoliquiritigenin 2′-O-methyltransferase, also called chalcone O-methyltransferase (CHMT), anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase, anthocyanin 3′-O-β-glucosyltransferase (3′GT), and anthocyanin 5-aromatic acyltransferase, are implicated in the qualitative modification of phenylpropanoids (glycosylation and methylation), resulting in anthocyanins, isoflavonoids, flavones, and ferulates (Jaakola, 2013).

Table II. List of selected altered genes in leaves of AM- and Pi-treated plants compared with controls.

Probe Set Gene Identifier Gene Name AM Versus Control Q Pi Versus Control Q
Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
 A_27_P157881 MTR_3g087640 Anthocyanin 5-aromatic acyltransferase 9.84 0.019 −1.22 0.481
 A_27_P066691 Mtr.24857 Isoflavonoid glycosyltransferase 4.88 0.005 −2.38 0.242
 A_27_P073091 MTR_5g016660 Anthocyanin 3′-O-β-glucosyltransferase (3′GT) 6.09 0.015 −1.03 0.537
 A_27_P071811 Mtr.17854 Anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase 3.39 0.017 −1.96 0.227
 A_27_P138561 MTR_4g090560 Isoflavonoid malonyl transferase 2.04 0.040 −1.18 0.407
 A_27_P017915 MTR_3g031650 Dihydroflavanol reductase (DFR) 2.03 0.032 −1.46 0.209
 A_27_P252062 MTR_7g011990 Isoliquiritigenin 2′-O-methyltransferase (CHMT) 2.14 0.032 −1.14 0.334
 A_27_P262294 MTR_4g038440 Caffeate 3-O-methyltransferase 2.09 0.038 1.13 0.438
 A_27_P041421 MTR_8g039720 4-Coumarate-CoA ligase5-like (4CL) 2.73 0.003 −2.37 0.016
 A_27_P075601 MTR_3g070860 Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) 2.55 0.043 −5.47 0.006
 A_27_P025011 MTR_7g100510 Transparent testa glabra2 (TTG2) −2.06 0.017 −1.18 0.206
Terpenoid biosynthesis
 A_27_P071866 Mtr.6785 Terpene synthase1 8.52 0.007 −1.26 0.376
 A_27_P095966 MTR_5g091050 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) 7.95 0.049 −2.54 0.081
 A_27_P319642 MTR_8g072640 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) 3.27 0.039 −4.50 0.060
 A_27_P249272 MTR_4g031800 Triterpene UDP-glucosyl transferase (UGT73K1) 3.54 0.050 −1.01 0.551
 A_27_P060581 MTR_4g031820 Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP72A61) 3.21 0.009 −1.03 0.534
 A_27_P280972 Mtr.3401 Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP72a67v2) 3.19 0.022 −4.91 0.110
 A_27_P012095 MTR_4g005190 β-Amyrin synthase 3.08 0.023 −2.50 0.233
 A_27_P060566 Mtr.15375 Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP93E2) 2.82 0.008 −1.71 0.180
 A_27_P098361 NA Squalene epoxidase3 (SQE3) 2.81 0.005 −1.44 0.069
Lipid biosynthesis, metabolism, and transfer
 A_27_P099341 MTR_5g017260 Triacylglycerol lipase 3.70 0.002 −1.63 0.166
 A_27_P248717 MTR_4g124080 Diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) 2.87 0.050 3.51 0.001
 A_27_P084651 MTR_7g087190 GDSL-motif esterase/lipase −3.49 0.050 1.46 0.141
 A_27_P355817 NA GDSL-motif esterase/lipase −2.77 0.045 −2.28 0.066
Oxylipin/JA signaling
 A_27_P258482 MTR_5g013530 Jasmonate zim-domain (JAZ) protein 5.44 0.004 1.13 0.506
 A_27_P238868 MTR_5g024020 9S-Lipoxygenase (9-LOX) 4.66 0.006 −1.69 0.273
 A_27_P062321 MTR_8g018730 9S-Lipoxygenase (9-LOX) 4.29 0.003 −1.47 0.327
 A_27_P110056 MTR_8g107300 Jasmonate zim-domain (JAZ) protein 3.41 0.033 2.23 0.338
 A_27_P057826 MTR_8g067280 MYC2 transcription factor 3.38 0.032 −3.51 0.025
 A_27_P330397 MTR_5g053950 Allene oxide cyclase (AOC) 3.05 0.019 −1.34 0.257
 A_27_P097056 NA 13S-Lipoxygenase, similar to AtLOX2 2.84 0.020 −1.39 0.337
 A_27_P091546 Mtr.22358 9S-Lipoxygenase 2.32 0.032 −1.77 0.173
 A_27_P344712 NA 13S-Lipoxygenase, similar to AtLOX2 2.25 0.049 −1.57 0.284
 A_27_P094741 NA Lipoxygenase5 (LOX5) 2.18 0.034 −2.56 0.065
 A_27_P013630 MTR_4g068550 Allene oxide synthase (AOS) 2.01 0.025 −1.11 0.415
ABA
 A_27_P320287 NA 9-cis-Epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3.76 0.005 −1.19 0.406
 A_27_P243492 NA Zeaxanthin epoxidase 3.65 0.000 1.17 0.333
 A_27_P258127 MTR_5g017330 Zeaxanthin epoxidase 2.22 0.003 1.11 0.260
 A_27_P047556 MTR_8g026960 Homeobox-Leu zipper protein ATHB-7 2.16 0.039 1.39 0.266
Ethylene
 A_27_P047216 Mtr.12275 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase 2.48 0.035 −1.62 0.240
 A_27_P074801 MTR_2g025120 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase −2.51 0.032 1.63 0.324
 A_27_P009606 MTR_7g020980 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor −2.94 0.035 −2.16 0.058
CK
 A_27_P005847 MTR_2g035020 Cytokinin-O-glucosyltransferase 3.51 0.032 −1.23 0.467
Auxin
 A_27_P199111 MTR_5g005670 Trp synthase β-chain 2.12 0.030 1.72 0.010
 A_27_P287213 MTR_104s0003 Auxin-responsive AUX/IAA-gene family member −2.34 0.010 1.26 0.120
Iron homeostasis
 A_27_P065276 MTR_5g083170 Ferritin2 (FER2) −3.03 0.032 −2.32 0.037
 A_27_P065856 MTR_4g014540 Ferritin3 (FER3) −6.30 0.015 −4.92 0.006
 A_27_P249542 MTR_1g099010 Vacuolar iron transporter/Nodulin-like protein (VIT) −6.74 0.022 −2.18 0.065
 A_27_P326777 MTR_7g069980 Ferritin1 (FER1) −35.53 0.003 −21.61 0.001
 A_27_P311167 MTR_6g034975 Vacuolar iron transporter/Nodulin-like protein (VIT) −83.29 0.007 −10.26 0.002

Values in boldface represent significant alterations in AM or Pi plants versus controls (transcript ratio of at least 2, Q < 0.05). Positive and negative ratios indicate up- and down-regulated genes, respectively. NA, Not annotated. Complete data sets for alteration in gene expression are presented in Supplemental Tables S2 to S5.

Among the genes of the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway found to be up-regulated by AM symbiosis, 4CL and LDOX were significantly down-regulated by Pi treatment (Table II). In addition, no change by mycorrhization but down-regulation by Pi was observed for the genes coding for cinnamoyl CoA reductase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, involved in early steps of the phenylpropanoid pathway, and TRANSPARENT TESTA5/chalcone isomerase, involved in flavonoid biosynthesis (Supplemental Table S5; Gholami et al., 2014). In contrast, a gene coding for flavanol synthase/flavanone 3-hydroxylase, responsible for the biosynthesis of flavanols, was specifically up-regulated by Pi (Supplemental Table S4). TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2 (Nesi et al., 2001), which encodes a WRKY transcription factor that influences the biosynthesis of proanthocyanidins (PAs) and their derivatives, was specifically down-regulated by AM symbiosis (Table II).

AM Symbiosis Up-Regulates Genes Involved in Terpenoid Biosynthesis

Table II lists nine genes of the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway that were found to be significantly up-regulated by mycorrhization but not affected by Pi fertilization. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) is a rate-controlling enzyme catalyzing the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate, one of the first steps in terpenoid biosynthesis. Other affected genes were TERPENE SYNTHASE1, coding for a sesquiterpene synthase (Gomez et al., 2005), and SQUALENE EPOXIDASE3, coding for an enzyme helping in the first oxygenation step in sterol biosynthesis (Chugh et al., 2003). β-Amyrin synthase is committed to the first step in the biosynthesis of saponins, which are glycosylated triterpenoids protecting plants against pathogens and pests (Morita et al., 2000; Suzuki et al., 2002; Thimmappa et al., 2014). In addition, we found three genes for cytochromes P450: CYP76A61 and CYP93E2 (β-amyrin hydrolase), catalyzing the formation of the nonhemolytic sapogenin soyasapogenol B (Soya_B), and CYP72a67v2, which is a putative β-amyrin oxidase (Fukushima et al., 2013). Finally, UGT73K1 encodes a triterpene UDP-glucosyl transferase dedicated to linking a sugar moiety to the triterpene aglycones hederagenin and soyasapogenols B and E to produce saponins (Achnine et al., 2005).

AM Symbiosis Activates Genes Involved in Lipid and Hormone Biosynthesis

AM symbiosis up-regulated the expression of two lipid biosynthetic genes, namely DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE (DGAT), which helps in the processing of diacylglycerol (DAG) to triacylglycerol, and TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE, dedicated to the conversion back to DAG (Table II). In contrast, two genes coding for GDSL-motif esterase/lipase acting as lipid hydrolases were found to be down-regulated in AM leaves. Pi treatment also up-regulated DGAT but did not significantly alter any other gene involved in lipid metabolism.

We also observed an increase in transcripts of genes involved in the biosynthesis of JA and other oxylipins, including the JA precursor 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA). Genes encoding 9- and 13-lipoxygenases (9-LOXs and 13-LOXs, depending on where the oxygenation takes place), allene oxide synthase (AOS) and allene oxide cyclase (AOC), which successively convert the α-linolenic acid to OPDA, were all found to be up-regulated in leaves of AM plants. Besides this, the MYC2 gene, known as a key positive regulator of JA signaling (Kazan and Manners, 2013), and two genes encoding jasmonate zim-domain (JAZ) proteins, acting as negative regulators of JA signaling, also were up-regulated (Table II). Furthermore, the gene coding for the homeobox-Leu zipper ATHB-7 as well as two isoforms of zeaxanthin epoxidases and 9-cis-epoxy-carotenoid dioxygenase, involved in ABA biosynthesis (Xiong and Zhu, 2003), were found to be up-regulated. Taken together, these results highlight the activation in AM leaves of oxylipin/JA- and ABA-regulated pathways, also known to promote systemic defense mechanisms in mycorrhized roots (Cameron et al., 2013). In addition, one gene coding for cytokinin-O-glucosyltransferase was up-regulated in AM leaves (Table II). Auxin- and ethylene-related genes were found to be either up- or down-regulated. In contrast to mycorrhization, Pi fertilization down-regulated the expression of MYC2 and one LOX gene and did not significantly alter any other genes involved in hormone biosynthesis or signaling (Table II).

AM Symbiosis and Pi Fertilization Down-Regulate Genes Involved in Iron Homeostasis

Iron (Fe) is an essential mineral nutrient for plants and serves as a cofactor for enzymes involved in respiration, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and chloroplast development (Nishio et al., 1985; Kobayashi and Nishizawa, 2012). However, excess free Fe(II) is toxic for cells due to the formation of hydroxyl radicals, causing deleterious effects to cellular constituents (Orino et al., 2001). Well-known Fe homeostasis genes were found to be down-regulated in leaves of both AM- and Pi-treated plants (Table II). These include genes coding for FERRITIN1 (FER1), FER2, and FER3, which serve in the storage of Fe (Arosio et al., 2009), and two vacuolar iron transporters (VITs) whose Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) counterpart promotes the influx of Fe into vacuoles (Kim et al., 2006).

AM Symbiosis and Pi Fertilization Decrease Total Iron, Whereas AM Specifically Increases Flavonoid and Anthocyanin Contents

Because Fe homeostasis genes were down-regulated by AM and Pi, we assumed that leaf Fe content was altered by these treatments. To verify this hypothesis, we used the Ferrozine-based assay (Stookey, 1970) and determined available Fe(II) and Fe(III), two stable and interconvertible forms of Fe. As expected, both Fe(II) and Fe(III) levels were lower in AM and Pi plants as compared with control plants (Fig. 2A), suggesting that the down-regulation of Fe homeostasis genes might be the consequence of the reduction in available Fe.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Quantification of available Fe, total flavonoids, and anthocyanins in M. truncatula leaves. A, Content of (Fe)II and Fe(III). B, Total flavonoids expressed as quercetin equivalent (QE). C, Total anthocyanins expressed as cyanindin 3-O-glucoside equivalent (C3-O-G). Bars represent means ± sd from four plants. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treatments and the control (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05 [*], P < 0.01 [**], and P < 0.001 [***]; GraphPad Prism). DW, Dry weight; FW, fresh weight.

Next, we verified whether transcriptional changes of phenylpropanoid-related genes impacted flavonoid and anthocyanin contents in leaves. As expected, both contents were increased significantly in AM plants, while those of Pi-treated plants were unchanged compared with control plants (Fig. 2, B and C), in line with the up-regulation by mycorrhization of genes involved in flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis (Table II).

AM Symbiosis Regulates the Levels of Phenylpropanoid, Lipids, and Terpenoid Metabolites

To get information about metabolite changes in AM leaves as compared with 5 mm Pi-treated and control leaves, we carried out an untargeted metabolomic analysis at 4 wpi. With the purpose of testing our experimental setup for this type of analysis, we also included in this experiment plants treated with 1 mm Pi, knowing that they display nonsignificantly different P concentrations in leaves from control and AM plants (Supplemental Table S1). From the metabolite profile (Supplemental Table S8), an orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA; Trygg and Wold, 2002) was performed, and individual comparison was performed between the control and the AM or the two Pi treatments (Supplemental Fig. S2A). Indeed, no valid statistical models could discriminate between the profiles of control and 1 mm Pi treatment. The SUS (Shared and Unique Structures) plot (see “Materials and Methods”) between the two valid statistical models was used to select similar metabolite trends between 5 mm Pi-treated and AM leaves. Student’s t test was performed between control × 5 mm Pi and control × AM plants, and multiple testing correction was performed according to Benjamin and Hochberg (1995; Supplemental Table S9). Metabolites displaying significant differences (Q < 0.05) are listed in Table III. We discovered that major changes in leaves from AM plants compared with control plants fell mainly into the categories of phenylpropanoid derivatives (flavonoids and other phenylpropanoids), carotenoid derivatives, glycerolipids, saponin-type terpenoids, and glucoside conjugates.

Table III. List of metabolites increased or decreased in leaves of AM- and Pi-treated plants compared with controls.

m/z Retention Time Metabolite Class AM Versus Control Q Pi Versus Control Q
min
Flavonoids
 355.1 1.848 Prenylchalcone −1.89 0.000 −1.17 0.442
 353.1 1.909 Prenylchalcone −1.93 0.000 −1.21 0.383
 613.2 1.249 Proanthodelphinidin 2.09 0.027 1.35 0.725
 575.2 3.030 Fromosin-7-O-glucoside-6′′-O-malonate 1.35 0.026 1.20 0.554
 575.2 3.181 Fromosin-7-O-glucoside-6′′-O-malonate 1.23 0.027 1.16 0.561
 649.3 3.394 Apigenin glucuronic glucoside −3.23 0.026 −2.41 0.205
 991.2 3.598 Luteolin glucuronic 5OH-coniferyl alcohol 1.59 0.028 1.37 0.776
Other phenylpropanoids
 344.1 2.702 Coumaroyl-glucoside 1.55 0.028 1.58 0.117
 439.2 2.797 1′-O-Benzyl-l-rhamnopyranosyl 1.35 0.039 1.12 0.762
 439.2 3.050 1′-O-Benzyl-l-rhamnopyranosyl −1.53 0.026 −1.18 0.115
 476.2 3.450 N-Feruloyltyramine glucoside −1.59 0.008 −1.15 0.130
 353.1 3.174 Ferulic acid-GlcA −0.70 0.011 −1.71 0.012
 445.1 3.174 Ferulic acid-GlyA-glycerol −1.69 0.011 −1.74 0.012
 314.1 3.451 N-Feruloyltyramine −1.57 0.022 −1.17 0.113
 314.1 3.940 N-Feruloyltyramine −1.70 0.009 −1.17 0.352
 561.2 3.170 Dilignol glucoside 1.21 0.020 1.33 0.227
Carotenoid derivatives and lipids
 433.2 4.298 Dihydroxy blumenol glucoside −30,090 0.000 1.28 0.332
 465.2 4.198 Blumenol B malonylglucoside −2.17 0.001 −1.97 0.101
 285.2 3.566 Dihydroxyphaseic acid-like −3.07 0.028 −2.30 0.117
 487.2 3.479 Tributyrin glucoside (triacylglycerol) −3.11 0.028 −1.95 0.131
 537.3 6.021 MGMG (18:3) 1.97 0.027 1.79 0.306
 799.5 7.715 MGDG (36:5) 1.40 0.042 1.38 0.401
Saponins
 1383.6 4.420 Medicagenic acid derived 1.29 0.044 1.43 0.115
 1385.6 4.088 Zhanic acid derived 1.38 0.031 1.23 0.612
 1564.7 4.098 3-Glc-Glc-Glc, 23-Ara, 28-Ara-Rha-Xyl zhanic acid 1.73 0.005 1.33 0.621
 1254.6 4.192 Hederagenin derived −1.37 0.009 1.04 0.630
 953.5 4.225 Oleanolic acid derived −1.48 0.014 −1.05 0.437
 957.5 4.690 dHex-Hex-HexA-Hederagenin −2.13 0.011 −1.49 0.101
 1117.5 4.732 Hederagenin derived −2.27 0.022 −1.55 0.323
 999.5 5.200 Soya_B derived −2.46 0.024 −1.54 0.115
 1029.5 5.202 Soya_B derived −2.24 0.045 −1.47 0.115
 867.5 5.203 Soya_B derived −2.54 0.025 −1.66 0.115
 1011.5 5.218 Soya_B derived −2.12 0.037 −1.48 0.118
 1029.5 5.447 Soya_B derived −2.37 0.041 −1.69 0.115
 1131.6 5.235 Sophoradiol derived −2.34 0.032 −1.45 0.182
Glucoside conjugates
 342.1 1.599 6-(α-d-Glucosaminyl)-1D-myoinositol 1.19 0.032 1.05 0.721
 289.2 3.747 1-O-Hexyl-d-glucitol 1.23 0.006 1.33 0.127
 361.1 1.821 Syringaldazine 1.39 0.020 1.21 0.700
 267.2 3.116 1-O-Hexyl-d-Mannitol −1.26 0.028 1.00 0.628
 223.2 2.916 2-Benzyl-2-hydroxybutanedioate −1.38 0.000 1.10 0.428
 317.1 2.676 Glc-l-rhodinose −1.36 0.014 −1.28 0.205
 207.1 3.181 2-Benzylsuccinate −1.72 0.089 −1.36 0.023

Values marked in boldface represent significant alterations presented as metabolite ratios in AM or Pi plants versus controls (Q < 0.05). Positive and negative ratios indicate increased and decreased levels, respectively. The values presented are based on peak area normalized against leaf fresh weight and are means of seven to eight plants. m/z is the mass-to-charge ratio of the molecular ion. Complete data sets of metabolites are presented in Supplemental Tables S8 and S9.

Among flavonoids, the levels of proanthodelphinidin, a luteolin derivative, and the isoflavonoid fromosin-7-O-glucoside-6′′-O-malonate were increased in AM leaves, contrasting with the decreased levels of prenylchalcone and an apigenin glucoside. Furthermore, the levels of other phenylpropanoid-conjugated forms either decreased (ferulates) or increased (glycosylates) in AM plants, whereas two ferulates also decreased in Pi-treated plants.

Blumenol B malonylglucoside, dihydroxyphaseic acid-like, and tributyrin glucoside decreased in leaves of AM plants. Surprisingly, a metabolite tentatively annotated as dihydroxy blumenol glucoside (Supplemental Fig. S3) decreased about 30,000-fold in AM plants. Galactolipids (mono and diacyl forms) were enhanced in AM plants, whereas the saponin derivatives and several glucoside conjugates responded in different ways in AM plants. No saponins or glucoside conjugates were affected in leaves of Pi-treated plants, but 2-benzyl succinate was found to be down-regulated.

AM Symbiosis and Pi Fertilization Stimulate the Production of CKs, Whereas AM Specifically Stimulates ABA Production

The plant hormones CKs and auxins are the main players in leaf development and nutrient allocation (Spíchal, 2012; Vanstraelen and Benková, 2012), whereas SA, JAs, and ABA are well known for their roles in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (Rivas-San Vicente and Plasencia, 2011; Finkelstein, 2013; Yan et al., 2013). Therefore, we expected that the influence of AM symbiosis on host metabolism also would be reflected in the hormonal composition and levels when compared with control plants. Highly sensitive methods utilizing mass spectrometry were used for the detection of compounds from CKs, auxins, JAs, ABA, and SA families (Novák et al., 2012; Svačinová et al., 2012; Floková et al., 2014).

Thirty compounds from targeted plant hormone families were detected (Supplemental Table S10), quantified, and statistically evaluated in leaf samples from the control, AM-, and Pi-fertilized plants. A principal component analysis (PCA) plot shows clear separation of all groups and clustering of samples of the same group (Fig. 3A). From OPLS-DA S-plots, hormones with the highest correlation and covariance were selected (top right corner and bottom left corner of the S-plot; Supplemental Fig. S4). When comparing AM treatment versus control, cytokinin species (dihydrozeatin [DHZ], trans-zeatin riboside [tZR], trans-zeatin 9-glucoside [tZ9G], dihydrozeatin 9-glucoside [DHZ9G], trans-zeatin [tZ], and dihydrozeatin riboside [DHZR]) and ABA (increased concentrations in AM) and SA and JA-Ile (decreased concentrations in AM) can be selected (Supplemental Fig. S4A). When comparing Pi treatment versus control, tZR and DHZ9G (increased concentrations in Pi) and SA and JA-Ile (decreased concentrations in Pi) can be selected (Supplemental Fig. S4B). Further statistical analysis of selected metabolites with ANOVA followed by Fisher’s lsd test for multiple comparisons highlights that ABA and the CK metabolite DHZ were increased specifically in AM leaves, whereas the other hormone species were altered similarly by mycorrhization and Pi fertilization (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Quantification of hormones in M. truncatula leaves. A, PCA score plot (explained variance R2 = 0.722 and predicted variance Q2 = 0.0801; ellipse, Hotelling’s T2 [95%]). B, Content of cytokinin species (tZR, trans-zeatin riboside; tZ9G, trans-zeatin 9-glucoside; DHZ, dihydrozeatin; DHZ9G, dihydrozeatin 9-glucoside) and the stress-related hormones JA-Ile, ABA, and SA. Bars represent means ± sd from six plants. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treatments and the control (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05 [*], P < 0.01 [**], and P < 0.001 [***]; GraphPad Prism). FW, Fresh weight.

JA But Not ABA Application Activates Genes Involved in Flavonoid and Terpenoid Biosynthesis

The up-regulation of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis (Table II) coincided with the enhanced level of ABA specifically in leaves of AM plants (Fig. 3B). Based on the up-regulation of genes involved in JA biosynthesis (Table II), we also expected an enhanced level for this hormone in AM plants. Since this was not confirmed by our measurements (Fig. 3B), we hypothesized that JAs might have increased initially in AM leaves and, thereafter, were transported toward distal tissues such as roots, resulting in a reduced steady-state level of JAs in leaves. Alternatively, increased JAs could be present in leaves in forms not detectable by the method used. Furthermore, genes involved in ABA and JA signaling as well as genes involved in phenylpropanoid and terpenoid biosynthesis were up-regulated specifically in leaves of AM plants (Table II).

To investigate whether increased ABA and JA levels in leaves can affect secondary metabolism, we analyzed the expression of involved genes in nonmycorrhized plants whose leaves were treated with either methyl jasmonate (MeJA) or ABA at two concentrations. After 24 h of treatment at the higher concentrations (1 mm MeJA and 100 μm ABA), the expression of ATHB-7, used as a positive control for ABA-responsive genes, was indeed enhanced significantly in leaves by ABA but not by MeJA application as compared with leaves of control-treated plants (Fig. 4). The expression of MYC2, the master regulator of JA signaling, was significantly and similarly enhanced by 1 mm MeJA and 100 μm ABA. The expression of AM-regulated genes involved in JA biosynthesis (AOS) and signaling (JAZ/MTR_5g013530), in the production of flavonoids (LDOX and 3′GT), and in the biosynthesis of saponin-type terpenoids (UGT73K1) was significantly up-regulated by MeJA but not by ABA treatment of leaves. Interestingly, expression of the CHMT gene, which is involved in the methylation of isoflavonoids, was not found to be altered by either MeJA or ABA application. This observation, together with the fact that the expression of this gene was found to be up-regulated by AM symbiosis (Table II), suggests that factors other than ABA and JAs may be involved in isoflavonoid production. The lower concentrations of hormones (100 μm MeJA and 10 μm ABA) were not sufficient in our conditions to significantly alter the expression of the above AM-regulated genes (Supplemental Table S11). The insignificant expression change of MYC2 by the lower concentration of MeJA could be explained by the fact that this is an early JA-induced gene (Ding et al., 2011; An et al., 2016), so that its expression levels may be down again at 24 h after the application of MeJA. Taken together, these data suggest that the treatment of leaves from nonmycorrhized plants with 1 mm MeJA can induce a similar pattern of alterations in JA biosynthesis and signaling pathways as well as flavonoid and terpenoid biosynthesis to that in AM plants, most likely via MYC2-regulated pathways. Although treatment with 100 μm ABA up-regulates MYC2 expression, this does not activate either the JA pathways or the biosynthesis of flavonoids and terpenoids in leaves.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Relative expression of genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in leaves of nonmycorrhized M. truncatula plants in response to 100 μm ABA and 1 mm MeJA treatments. Total RNA was isolated after 24 h of treatment, and changes in transcript abundance were determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. The relative expression of MtATHB-7 (MTR_8g026960), MtMYC2 (MTR_8g067280), MtAOS (MTR_4g068550), MtJAZ (MTR_5g013530), MtLDOX (MTR_3g070860), Mt3′GT (MTR_5g016660), MtUGT73K1 (MTR_4g031800), and MtCHMT (MTR_7g011990) genes was calculated as 2−ΔCq and normalized using MtTef-1a as an internal reference gene. Bars represent means ± sd from six plants. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treatments and the control (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05 [*], P < 0.01 [**], and P < 0.001 [***]; GraphPad Prism).

DISCUSSION

As compared with the knowledge available about transcriptomic and metabolomic changes in roots of mycorrhized M. truncatula plants, little attention has been paid to corresponding alterations occurring in shoots, their underlying cellular pathways, as well as their interconnections. In this study, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of the genome and metabolic changes in shoots of AM plants with similar P status to control plants and compared them with those induced by treatment with high Pi (5 mm) using a previously established experimental system (Adolfsson et al., 2015). Our choice of concentration for the Pi treatment arose from similar studies in legumes comparing control, AM, and Pi treatments. Schliemann et al. (2008) followed the kinetics of the accumulation of primary and secondary metabolites in M. truncatula and found distinct profiles for AM, nonmycorrhized, and 13.3 mm Pi-treated roots. Grunwald et al. (2009) studied transcriptional changes in control, AM- (three Glomus spp.), and Pi-fertilized (1.3 mm) M. truncatula roots containing 6-fold more Pi than the control. Hence, we assumed that fertilization with 5 mm Pi, yielding 7-fold more Pi than in control and AM plants, was an appropriate treatment in our experimental conditions to distinguish the AM-specific changes from those shared with Pi fertilization in M. truncatula leaves.

The microarray-based gene expression analysis revealed a minor overlap of transcriptional changes in leaves of AM- and Pi-fertilized plants (21 out of 297 genes; i.e. approximately 7%). A low overlap between AM- and high-Pi-induced gene expression also was reported for M. truncatula roots (4%; Hohnjec et al., 2005). This, together with our observations, strengthens the view that systemic transcriptional responses in leaves and roots of AM plants are largely due to mycorrhization and not shared with Pi fertilization. In line with the transcriptional pattern, OPLS-DA of the metabolomic analysis showed largely distinct metabolite profiles for AM- and Pi-treated plants (Supplemental Fig. S2A). Of the secondary metabolites that were significantly different in AM leaves as compared with control leaves, only two out of 41 were altered in a similar manner in the Pi treatment (Table III). Some discordance observed between transcriptomic and metabolomic results could be explained by posttranslational modifications regulating the activity of enzymes as well as metabolite fluxes (Fernie and Stitt, 2012). A previous metabolomics study on Plantago major leaves under mycorrhization with R. irregularis (Schweiger et al., 2014a) found 40% of the AM metabolites (mostly primary metabolites) in Pi-treated plants, which was explained on the basis of similar Pi concentrations in leaves of the two treatments.

AM Symbiosis Regulates Flavonoid/Anthocyanin and Terpenoid Biosynthesis

The RNA microarray data sets from AM leaves revealed the up-regulation of several transcripts involved in the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid derivatives, especially flavonoids including anthocyanins (Table II; Fig. 5A). Determination of the total anthocyanin and flavonoid contents also suggests an increase in the biosynthesis of phenolic metabolites compared with the control (Fig. 2, B and C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Scheme summarizing transcriptional regulation and metabolite changes. A, The phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway. B, The terpenoid and apocarotenoid biosynthetic pathway. Names of metabolites and their derivatives are written in black, whereas those of the enzymes involved are written in blue. Plus (+) and minus (−) in front of AM and/or Pi indicate increase or decrease, respectively, in expression of the corresponding genes or in metabolite levels.

Previous studies have shown changes in transcript levels of flavonoid biosynthetic genes in roots of M. truncatula infected with AM fungi (Wulf et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2007). In roots, flavonoids are believed to stimulate fungal spore germination and hyphal growth and branching (Scervino et al., 2005). In our study, we observed one luteolin glucoside and proanthodelphinidin (a subset of PAs) increased in leaves of mycorrhized plants, while prenylchalcone and an apigenin glucoside decreased (Fig. 5A; Table III). Similarly, an improvement of luteolin-7-O-glucoside was observed in shoots of mycorrhized willow (Salix purpurea; Aliferis et al., 2015).

The glycosylation of flavonoids is important for their stability and solubility during transport and storage into the vacuole (Jiang et al., 2008; Plaza et al., 2014). The conversion of anthocyanidin to anthocyanin is driven by glycosyltransferases, whose expression was found to be stimulated in leaves during AM symbiosis (Table II; Fig. 5A). Anthocyanins are known to protect plants from excess light and prevent oxidative stress; similarly, PAs, which are also antioxidants, are involved in plant protection against insects and pathogens (Mouradov and Spangenberg, 2014).

A significant number of genes from the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway were found to be up-regulated by mycorrhization (Fig. 5B). Although we observed an overall decrease in terpenoids, a glycosylated zhanic acid derivative was increased significantly in AM leaves compared with controls. This could be explained based on the reduction in hederagenin derivative, which might have favored zhanic acid production, a parallel branch in the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway (Fig. 5B). All these changes could reflect the notion that terpenoids have a wide range of basic functions in growth and also are involved in defense against abiotic and biotic stress (Tholl, 2015).

ABA is the most studied member of plant apocarotenoids, which are cleavage products from a C40 carotenoid precursor. The hormone and microarray analyses indicate correlation between the increased ABA levels and the up-regulation of related biosynthetic genes in leaves of AM plants (Fig. 5B). This does not exclude the possibility proposed by Cameron et al. (2013) that ABA synthesized in mycorrhized roots is transported and may act as a long-distance signal for defense responses in leaves. Furthermore, the metabolomic analysis indicates significant decreases in the apocarotenoids blumenol B malonyl glucoside and dihydroxyphaseic acid-like in leaves of AM plants. Intriguingly, a dihydroxy blumenol glucoside almost completely disappeared in AM leaves (Table III). Cyclic C13 cyclohexenone-/α-inono- (e.g. blumenol) glucosides as well as yellow linear C14 mycorradicines have been associated with the establishment of mycorrhiza in roots (Floss et al., 2008; Schliemann et al., 2008) and are suggested to play a role in arbuscule turnover (Walter et al., 2010). Both ABA and blumenol are derived from all-trans-lycopene (for review, see Hou et al., 2016). The strong reduction of the dihydroxy blumenol glucoside in mycorrhized leaves could be due to either competing biosynthesis with ABA (Fig. 5B) or the long-distance transport to mycorrhized roots.

AM Symbiosis and Pi Fertilization Modulate Iron Homeostasis

Well-known Fe homeostasis genes such as VIT, FER1, FER2, and FER3 were remarkably down-regulated by AM symbiosis and Pi treatment (Table II). Repression of these genes correlated with the observed decrease of both Fe(II) and Fe(III) (Fig. 2A). It is worthy of note that an excess of available Fe(II) is toxic for cells due to the formation of hydroxyl radicals (Orino et al., 2001). To prevent this, cells orchestrate strategies to regulate Fe homeostasis by means of either oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III), the nontoxic form of Fe, chelation, sequestration by ferritins in plastids, or its transport into vacuoles through VIT (Arnaud et al., 2006; Ravet et al., 2009).

Pi acts as a strong chelator of Fe(II) (Rasmussen and Toftlund, 1986), so that a reduced available Fe content in leaves of Pi-treated plants was expected. Flavonoids also are well known as Fe chelators (Mira et al., 2002; Takeda, 2006). Hence, it is tempting to speculate that increased levels of flavonoids/anthocyanins/PAs in AM leaves favor Fe binding, thereby resulting in the down-regulation of Fe homeostasis genes. Because AM symbiosis also enhances flavonoid biosynthesis in the root (Harrison and Dixon, 1994; Larose et al., 2002), it is possible that flavonoids also modulate Fe homeostasis in this tissue, although contradictory results about the effect of mycorrhization on root Fe status were reported (Jin et al., 2014).

Increase of CKs May Promote Shoot Growth in AM- and Pi-Treated Plants

CKs are well-known signaling molecules promoting plant growth. Based on our data, increased levels of CKs in leaves of AM- and Pi-fertilized plants were not accompanied by transcriptional changes in CK biosynthesis (Table II). This can be explained by the fact that CKs also are synthesized in the root and translocated to the shoot (Sakakibara, 2006). The major transport form of CKs from root to shoot tissues is believed to be the conjugated CK form tZR (Kudo et al., 2010), which was found to be up-regulated in both AM- and Pi-fertilized plants as compared with controls. This hypothesis is in line with several studies reporting increased levels of CKs in both roots and shoots of AM plants (Fusconi, 2014). In addition, another conjugated form, tZ9G, was found to be up-regulated by both AM symbiosis and Pi fertilization, whereas AM specifically increased the free form DHZ (Fig. 3B).

We reported previously that AM- and Pi-fertilized M. truncatula plants had more and longer branches with larger and thicker leaflets and that only AM plants had a larger number of chloroplasts per cell section as compared with control plants (Adolfsson et al., 2015). CKs are known to promote cell division and branching as well as to support the development of chloroplasts (Cortleven and Schmülling, 2015). Hence, the observed increase of most CK metabolites may be the factor involved in remodeling the shoot architecture in AM and Pi plants, whereas the specific increase in DHZ may affect the chloroplast number.

JA Signaling May Play a Role in the AM-Induced Flavonoid and Terpenoid Biosynthesis

AM symbiosis, in contrast to Pi fertilization, stimulated the expression of genes involved in oxylipin biosynthesis in leaves (e.g. 9- and 13-LOX, AOS, and AOC; Table II). 13-LOX isoforms, which share a strong similarity with the chloroplast-localized AtLOX2, are dedicated to the biosynthesis of JA and its late precursor OPDA, while 9-LOXs are involved in the synthesis of JA-like molecules. Based on the observed AM-mediated transcriptional stimulation of the JA biosynthetic pathway, an increased content of JAs in AM leaves was expected. Instead, the content of the active conjugate JA-Ile was significantly lower in leaves of AM compared with control plants (Fig. 3B). It is reasonable to suggest that a transient increase of JA level in AM leaves could be sufficient to activate JA-responsive genes and downstream biosynthetic pathways. Indeed, the 24-h MeJA treatment of leaves of nonmycorrhized plants enhanced the expression of genes involved in JA biosynthesis (AOS) and signaling (MYC2 and JAZ/MTR_5g013530) as well as the expression of genes involved in flavonoid (LDOX and 3′GT) and terpenoid (UGT73K1) biosynthesis (Fig. 4), thus mimicking the effects of mycorrhization (Table II).

The lower level of JA-Ile in leaves of AM plants may be due to transport to distal tissues. Experimental evidence in Arabidopsis revealed the movement of JAs from wounded shoots toward roots, where they could affect defense gene expression (Gasperini et al., 2015). Such a long-distance transport of JAs has not yet been demonstrated for mycorrhized plants such as M. truncatula. Nevertheless, an increase in AM colonization was shown upon repeated wounding of M. truncatula leaves (a condition inducing JA biosynthesis) or following JA application to the shoot (Landgraf et al., 2012). In addition, many studies reported increases of JA levels in mycorrized roots of M. truncatula, which were accompanied by the up-regulation of JA biosynthesis and JA-induced responses, resulting in the establishment and maintenance of arbuscular mycorrhizas (for review, see Wasternack and Hause, 2013). Genes involved in JA biosynthesis also were found to be up-regulated in leaves of mycorrhized maize (Zea mays) plants (Gerlach et al., 2015). The previous works together with our observations (Table II; Fig. 4) support enhanced JA biosynthesis and signaling in both shoots and roots of mycorrhized plants and may involve the long-distance transport of JAs to ensure sufficient levels of root fungal colonization. In Pi-treated plants, the lower JA-Ile content coincides with the down-regulation of a few JA-responsive genes, including MYC2 (Table II). This suggests that high Pi also affects JA signaling, but to lesser extent compared with mycorrhization.

AM symbiosis, in contrast to Pi fertilization, enhanced the level of ABA in leaves (Fig. 3B), in agreement with the up-regulation of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and response (Table II). It has been reported that MYC2 functions as a transcriptional activator of ABA signaling in Arabidopsis leaves under abiotic stress (Abe et al., 2003; Takagi et al., 2016). The crosstalk between ABA and JA has been shown to be regulated by MYC2 (Kazan and Manners, 2013). The mechanism behind this may involve the interaction between MYC2 and an ABA receptor in the presence of ABA, which could modify transcription driven by MYC2 in JA signaling pathways (Aleman et al., 2016). This could explain why, in our study, the 24-h ABA treatment of leaves did not alter the expression of AOS, JAZ/MTR_5g013530, or the JA-regulated flavonoid and terpenoid biosynthetic genes, despite the enhanced expression of MYC2 (Fig. 4).

Based on our data, we propose a model of interactive pathways that modulate hormone levels, secondary metabolism, oxidative/iron stress, and ultimately growth in leaves of AM and Pi plants (Fig. 6). In this model, AM symbiosis promotes growth directly by enhancing CK levels and indirectly by stimulating MYC2-regulated JA and ABA signaling pathways in leaves. The JA signaling pathway for the biosynthesis of flavonoids, in turn, helps to chelate free Fe, thus improving fitness in oxidative stress. Possible ABA signaling pathways could be defense mechanisms for stomatal closure, induction of reactive oxygen species, and cell wall reinforcement during abiotic and biotic stress (Cameron et al., 2013). Pi fertilization also promotes growth via CKs and alleviates oxidative stress by a direct binding of free Fe to Pi. The proposed model contributes to enhanced functional insights into the AM fungus-plant interaction as well as the Pi-plant interaction at the shoot level and should be fully validated in future studies.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Proposed model of AM-regulated pathways in M. truncatula leaves. Mycorrhization enhances the level of ABA and possibly transiently the level of JA. Both JA and ABA activate the expression of the transcription factor MYC2. Only the JA-mediated activation in turn stimulates the expression of flavonoid-related genes. The resulting increase in flavonoids (including anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins) improves the scavenging of available iron. In Pi-fertilized plants, Pi binds directly to iron. Both mycorrhization and Pi fertilization increase the levels of CKs, which stimulate plant growth. Red and green colors indicate increase and decrease, respectively.

The results of MeJA and ABA application on leaves from nonmycorrhized plants (Fig. 4) demonstrate the role of these hormones in regulating flavonoid/anthocyanin production through MYC2-regulated pathways in M. truncatula and are in line with previous findings in the same and other plant species. Elicitor-induced transcription factors or JA application resulted in the reprogramming of secondary metabolism in M. truncatula (Naoumkina et al., 2008). In Arabidopsis, it has been shown that MeJA enhances anthocyanin content through the up-regulation of late biosynthetic genes including DFR and LDOX (Shan et al., 2009), a process in which the transcription factor AtMYC2 is the key regulator (Dombrecht et al., 2007). On the other hand, experiments in tomato fruits revealed the induction of early flavonoid biosynthesis genes in response to ABA application (Mou et al., 2015). Another work reported that ABA application on different organs of Vitis vinifera affects differently the expression of genes involved in different steps of flavonoid biosynthesis, which increased significantly only in berries (Rattanakon et al., 2016). In our study, although ABA treatment of leaves of nonmycorrhized plants up-regulated the expression of MYC2, it did not affect the expression of late flavonoid biosynthetic genes (Figs. 4 and 5). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that ABA produced in leaves of mycorrhized plants may interact with AM-induced JA pathways to regulate the expression of these genes. Therefore, it is reasonable to propose that MYC2 from M. truncatula might play a determinant role in the AM-mediated regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis. Taken together, AM-induced, JA- and ABA-regulated MYC2 expression and CK production are beneficial for the growth and fitness of mycorrhized plants.

CONCLUSION

In this report, we show that AM symbiosis induces a secondary metabolism response in leaves of M. truncatula, mainly in phenylpropanoid and terpenoid biosynthesis. These pathways also were affected by Pi treatment, although some metabolites were altered in a converse manner compared with mycorrhization. The AM-mediated changes in leaves might have been triggered by MYC2 in a JA- and ABA-dependent manner. The use of a multilevel methodology, including transcriptomics, metabolomics, and phytohormone analysis, provided an overview of the changes in secondary and hormone metabolism occurring in leaves during root colonization by AM fungi. Detailed functional analyses using mutants affected in the respective biosynthetic pathways should further validate our hypotheses and might reveal additional factors involved in the signaling and regulation of growth in shoots of AM plants. Some of the identified regulated genes could serve as possible markers for such metabolic changes as those observed in our study.

In fine, the prospective question is the endogenous signal that stimulates ABA production. Such a chemical switch could be reactive oxygen species, whose inductive effect on ABA biosynthesis has been reported in leaves (Mittler et al., 2011). Further studies are needed to decipher in detail the sequential steps in the mycorrhiza-induced secondary and hormone metabolic responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biological Material and Growth Conditions

We used the growth conditions and protocols described previously by Adolfsson et al. (2015). Two-day-old Medicago truncatula ‘Jemalong J5’ seedlings that had germinated on agar plates were transplanted to soil consisting of Agsorb (24/48 LVMGA; Oil-Dri) and 30% (v/v) inoculum or mock inoculum. The inoculum consisted of a mixture of Agsorb and Allium porum (leek) roots either infected with the fungus Rhizophagus irregularis (syn. Glomus intraradices; Redecker et al., 2013) BEG 141 (AM plants) or not infected (control plants). The plants were grown in a CLF PlantMaster chamber (Plant Climatics) using a daily cycle of 16 h of light (400 μmol photons m−2 s−1) at 25°C and 8 h of dark at 19°C and a relative humidity of 40%. Plants were watered once per week with a modified Long Ashton Nutrient Solution (Medicago-LANS; Hewitt, 1966), containing twice the amount of nitrate and no phosphate. Modified LANS medium supplemented with 5 mm NaH2PO4 was used for the Pi treatment, which was included to study the effects induced by high Pi supply, resulting in significantly increased (7-fold) leaf P content as compared with control and AM treatment (Table I). In some experiments, 1 mm Pi yielded nonsignificantly higher P levels than in control and AM plants (Supplemental Table S1).

Assessment of Root Mycorrhization

Young roots of AM plants were placed in 10% (w/v) KOH and incubated at 90°C for 45 min and thereafter incubated in black ink (90°C for 5 min; Vierheilig et al., 1998). The roots were then washed with tap water, dried, incubated in 8% (v/v) acetic acid at room temperature for 20 min, and finally rinsed with water. Afterward, the roots were cut in 30 pieces, mounted between slide and coverslide with glycerol at a distance of 0.5 to 1 mm, and analyzed with the Alphaphot-2 YS2 microscope (Nikon). The mycorrhizal colonization and the arbuscule abundance were estimated at 4 wpi using the formulas found on the Web page http://www2.dijon.inra.fr/mychintec (Trouvelot et al., 1986). This method was used to estimate the quality of plant-fungus symbiosis. In this study, plants were used at 4 weeks of age, when the mycorrhization was at maximum.

Phosphorus Determination

Dry shoot or leaf material was ground with a mortar. Soluble Pi content was measured after incubation in 1% (v/v) acetic acid at 42°C for 30 min. Total P (Pi and organic P) was measured after oxidizing organic P to Pi by incubating samples in an autoclave at 120°C for 1 h with an oxidation solution described by Valderrama (1981). Pi content was determined by colorimetric analysis using ammonium molybdate (Ames, 1966) and recalculated as mg of P.

Hormone Treatments

M. truncatula seeds were scarified and sterilized as described above. Sterilized seeds were sown on plates and transplanted into pots containing the same soil mixture and grown under the same conditions as described for nonmycorrhized plants. At the age of 4 wpi, plants were sprayed with either MeJA (Sigma-Aldrich) at concentrations of 100 µm and 1 mm or with ABA (Sigma-Aldrich) at concentrations of 10 and 100 µm in a solution also containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 1% (v/v) ethanol. Control plants for both hormone treatments were sprayed with a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 1% (v/v) ethanol. Approximately 10 mL of solution was evenly sprayed over six plants. After spraying, pots were covered with lids. The middle lobe of the latest fully developed leaf of six replicate plants was harvested 24 h posttreatment and used for RNA extraction.

RNA Extraction

For microarray analyses, total RNA was extracted from leaflets of the latest fully developed leaf from M. truncatula control, AM-, and Pi-treated plants using the E.Z.N.A. Plant RNA Kit Standard protocol following the manufacturer’s instructions (Omega Bio-Tek). The quality of RNA preparations was verified using the Agilent 2200 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Both aforementioned RNA extraction and bioanalysis methods also were employed for experiments with ABA and MeJA treatments.

Microarray Analysis and Data Deposition

Total RNAs of control, Pi-, and AM-treated plants at 4 wpi were sent to the affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Three biological replicates with one to two technical replicates per treatment were used. Total RNA was used to synthesize cyanine 3 labeled using Low Input Quick Amp Labeling according to the Agilent One-Color Gene Expression protocol. Labeled cRNA was purified, fragmented, and hybridized on Agilent Medicago Oligoarrays (8x60k) at 65°C under rotation in a hybridization oven. Array slides were washed with Gene Expression Wash buffers prior to drying. Fluorescent signals were measured with the G2505 C Micro Array Scanner (Agilent Technologies). Hybridization, washing steps, staining, and scanning were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Scanned images were analyzed with the Agilent Feature Extraction Software version 7.2. Resulting raw data were normalized (75th quantile, median to baseline of all samples).

Microarray data analysis was performed using Analyst software (Genedata). Raw data were normalized using the Lowess algorithm to identify regulated genes. A threshold of 2 for transcript ratio in treatment versus control, P < 0.01 (Student’s t test), and Q < 0.05 (false discovery rate multiple-test correction [Benjamin and Hochberg, 1995] as an indicator of false-positive significant genes) were set as criteria for the selection of regulated genes in AM- and Pi-fertilized plants as compared with control (nonmycorrhized) plants. The genes following a common pattern of expression (up-regulated/down-regulated) were grouped together. Further gene annotation was performed through the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). After the statistical analysis, when more than one significant probe sets matched the same gene identifier, redundant probe sets were randomly removed for simplicity. We did not observe opposite trends (both up- and down-regulation) within significant redundant probe sets. Classification of candidate genes was implemented according to Journet et al. (2002) and by manual inspection. Common features were determined with the Venny program (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html). The full data set is publicly available from the Gene Expression Omnibus repository at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Barrett et al., 2007) with accession number GSE80610.

Quantitative RT-PCR

To confirm the microarray results, the expression levels of 13 selected genes were investigated using quantitative RT-PCR. In addition, MtTef-1a, whose expression was found to be constant in all treatments (control, Pi, and AM), was used as a reference gene for normalization of expression data for the selected genes. Sequences of primers designed using Primer 3 software (flypush.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu/primer/primer3_www.cgi) are given in Supplemental Table S12.

Total RNA was used as a template to synthesize cDNA using the iScript cDNA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Next, cDNAs served as probes for quantitative PCR gene expression analysis using the Perfecta SYBR Green SuperMix kit (Roxtm). Three to four biological replicates and two technical replicates for each gene of interest were investigated. The cycle threshold values of quantitative PCR were used to normalize the expression levels of target genes with the expression level of the reference gene from M. truncatula (Kakar et al., 2008). The gene expression levels in leaves of AM- and Pi-treated plants were compared with the control condition.

Determination of Available Fe

Fe was extracted according to Everett et al. (2014) as follows. Dried leaf samples (20–60 mg) were soaked in 1 m HCl overnight at room temperature under gentle shaking; extracted Fe is referred to as available Fe. Then, samples were allowed to stand for 10 min, and the liquid phase was centrifuged at 400g and filtered. For the determination of available Fe(II), 150 µL of the samples was mixed with 150 µL of the extraction solution. Fe(III) was determined after reduction to Fe(II) with 50% (v/v) hydroxylamine hydrochloride. Both reduced and nonreduced samples were added to 2 mm Ferrozine in 50 mm potassium acetate buffer (pH 5.5). For each sample, the background was determined in the potassium acetate buffer and subtracted from the Ferrozine-based values. Equivalent volumes of 1 m HCl and hydroxylamine hydrochloride in 1 m HCl were used as blanks for nonreduced and reduced samples, respectively.

Total Flavonoid and Anthocyanin Content Analyses

Frozen leaves (30–60 mg) were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and ground using a pestle. After adding 1 mL of acidic methanol (3% [v/v] formic acid), samples were homogenized, and the tubes were incubated at 4°C overnight with continuous gentle shaking in the dark. Then, samples were centrifuged, the supernatant was transferred into a 15-mL Falcon tube, and the pellet was resuspended with 500 µL of acidic methanol twice and incubated for 10 min in the dark to fully extract anthocyanins. Combined supernatants were mixed with 1 mL of deionized water and 2 mL of chloroform. After centrifugation at 4,000g for 5 min, the upper organic phase enriched in anthocyanins was collected. The experiments were carried out in four replicates. Total flavonoid content was determined by the chloride colorimetric assay (Jia et al., 1999) and expressed according to the standard curve of quercetin at an absorbance of 510 nm. Anthocyanin content was measured by reading the A530 with a spectrophotometer using the pH differential method (buffers of 0.025 m KCl [pH 1] and 0.4 m sodium acetate [pH 4.5]). A standard curve of purified cyanidin 3-O-glucoside chloride (Sigma-Aldrich), one of the major anthocyanins in M. truncatula, was used as a reference.

Metabolomic Analysis

Metabolites were extracted from 20 mg of leaves for each treatment in 1 mL of methanol, chloroform, and water (20:60:20, v/v) including internal standards (Gullberg et al., 2004). A total of 200 μL of each sample was dried, dissolved in 20 μL of methanol, and then diluted with 20 μL of water.

The chromatographic separation was performed using an Agilent 1290 Infinity UHPLC system, where 2 µL of shoot extract was injected onto an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm C18) at 40°C. The gradient elution was A (water, 0.1% formic acid (v/v)) and B (75:25 acetonitrile:2-propanol, 0.1% formic acid v/v) as follows: 0.1% to 10% B (v/v) over 2 min, B was increased to 99% (v/v) over 5 min, and then held at 99% (v/v) for 2 min, returning to 0.1% (v/v) for 0.3 to 0.9 min; the flow rate was 0.5 mL min−1. The compounds were detected with an Agilent 6540 Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source operating in positive ion mode. A reference interface was connected for accurate mass measurements; the gas temperature was set to 300°C, the drying gas flow to 8 L min−1, and the nebulizer pressure to 40 psig. The sheath gas temperature was set to 350°C and the sheath gas flow to 11 L min−1. The capillary voltage was set to 4,000 V and the nozzle voltage was 0 V. The fragmentor voltage was 100 V, the skimmer was 45 V, and the octopole RF (OCT 1 RF Vpp) was 750 V. The collision energy was set to 0 V. The m/z range was 70 to 1,700, and data were collected in centroid mode with an acquisition rate of four scans per second. The tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra were obtained in the same conditions, with the collision energy from 10 to 40 V. The generated mass files were processed using Profinder B.06.00 (Agilent Technologies) using mass feature extraction and find-by-ion algorithms for peak detection. Mass Profiler Professional 12.5 (Agilent Technologies) was used to compile the extracted data into a data table for statistical analysis. The generated data were normalized against the internal standard and weight of each sample (Supplemental Table S8).

The metabolites were identified by manual interpretation of the high mass accuracy of fragments produced by MS/MS experiments and/or metabolite and mass spectra library database search. The OPLS-DA (Trygg and Wold, 2002) were performed using SIMCA 13.0 software comparing control with AM and Pi treatments. Valid statistical models consisted of Q2 ≥ 0.05 (Supplemental Fig. S2A). The VIP plot (Variable Importance for the Projection) in a confidence level of 95% was used to summarize how many variables explain the models. Valid models discriminate control from AM or 5 mm Pi, and the SUS (Shared and Unique Structures) plot (Wiklund et al., 2008) between them was used to select metabolites with similar or unique trends under 5 mm Pi and AM conditions. Based on the Q2, the comparison between control and 1 mm Pi did not result in a valid model. However, by selecting 17% of the metabolites (164 out of 988) on the basis of the VIP plot, a significant model was produced. The low percentage of variable metabolites in the 1 mm Pi model (contrasting with 28% for 5 mm Pi or 32% for AM) suggests minor changes in secondary metabolites under such low-Pi concentration, which make it indistinguishable from the control. Instead, the main changes under such low-Pi concentration might be in the primary rather than in the secondary metabolites. In this case, techniques other than liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) could be more appropriate.

The significant metabolites from the discriminant analyses as well as their respective P (Student’s t test) and Q (false discovery rate multiple-test correction calculated according to Benjamin and Hochberg [1995]) values are listed in Supplemental Table S9 for evaluation of the goodness of the results, and those exhibiting significant changes in treatments versus control (Q < 0.05) are presented in Table III.

Plant Hormone Analysis by Ultra-HPLC Tandem Electrospray Mass Spectrometry

The extraction and purification of plant hormones were carried out in six biological replicates. Samples were homogenized under liquid N2, and the amount corresponding to 20 mg fresh weight of material per sample was used for the analyses of CKs, JAs, ABA, and SA. The amount of sample corresponding to 10 mg fresh weight was used for the analysis of auxins.

CKs were extracted in modified Bieleski buffer (methanol:water:formic acid, 15:4:1, v/v/v) and then purified using two solid-phase extraction columns, a C18 octadecylsilica-based column (500 mg of sorbent; Applied Separations) and, after that, an Oasis MCX column (30 mg of mixed-mode sorbent with reversed-phase/cation-exchange properties; Waters; Dobrev and Kamínek, 2002). Auxins were extracted in 1 mL of cold 50 mm sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 1% diethyldithiocarbamic acid sodium salt (w/v). After extraction, samples were divided in half, using one-half for derivatization of labile indole-3-pyruvic acid by 0.25 m cysteamine (pH 8). Both fractions of the extract were purified by solid-phase extraction using Oasis HLB columns (30 mg mL−1; Waters). JAs, ABA, and SA were extracted using an aqueous solution of methanol (10% methanol:water, v/v) and purified using Oasis HLB columns (30 mg mL−1; Waters).

Levels of the CKs, auxins, and JAs together with SA and ABA were determined by the isotope dilution method using ultra-HPLC tandem electrospray mass spectrometry with stable isotope-labeled internal standards used as a reference (Novák et al., 2012; Svačinová et al., 2012; Floková et al., 2014).

The determined absolute concentrations of analytes (pmol g−1 fresh weight) were used to create a data set. The variables with more than 50% of missing values (values below the limit of detection) were removed from the data set. The variables containing up to 50% of missing values were replaced by two-thirds of the minimum of a group. The data were treated and statistically evaluated by SIMCA software (version 14; Umetrics). Pareto scaling and logarithmic transformation were applied to all data variables. Multivariate statistical analysis such as PCA and OPLS-DA were performed. Unsupervised PCA was used to give a general overview and observe trends of the data structure. To discriminate variables responsible for group separation, always two groups (control versus AM or control versus Pi treated) were compared by supervised OPLS-DA. An OPLS-DA S-plot was used for visualization. It combines covariance (p1; the farther the distance from zero, the higher the contribution to the difference between two groups) and correlation (pcorr1; the farther the distance from zero, the higher the reliability).

Statistics

All statistical analyses, except when stated, were conducted using one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s lsd as a posterior test in GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). Student’s t test and multiple-test correction were conducted using Mass Profiler Professional 13.0 (Agilent Technologies and Strand Life Sciences). Supplemental Table S1 provides an experimental overview with the types of analyses performed, conditions, and number of replicates.

Supplemental Data

The following supplemental materials are available.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis core facility at Novum, affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, for the microarray analyses; the Swedish Metabolomic Centre (www.swedishmetabolomicscentre.se) for access to the LC-MS instrumentation; and Jarmila Greplová, Eva Hirnerová, and Ivan Petřík for technical support and sample preparation during the plant hormone analyses.

Glossary

AM

arbuscular mycorrhizal

ABA

abscisic acid

JA

jasmonic acid

SA

salicylic acid

CK

cytokinin

wpi

weeks post inoculation

RT

reverse transcription

PAs

proanthocyanidins

OPLS-DA

orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis

PCA

principal component analysis

MeJA

methyl jasmonate

MS/MS

tandem mass spectrometry

LC-MS

liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

tZR

trans-zeatin riboside

tZ9G

trans-zeatin 9-glucoside

DHZ

dihydrozeatin

DHZ9G

dihydrozeatin 9-glucoside

Footnotes

1

This work was funded by the Carl Tryggers Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, the Foundation Olle Engkvist Byggmästare, the Adlebertska Foundation, and the University of Gothenburg (C.S.), the Herbert and Karin Jacobsson Foundation and the Hvitfeldska Foundation (L.A.), the Ministry of Research and Education of the Republic of France and the University of Le Mans (B.S.), the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) and the Swedish Research Council (K.L.). H.N. was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Carl Tryggers Foundation. A.H. was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Foundation Olle Engkvist Byggmästare. The metabolomics analysis was financed via a strategic grant from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (T.M.). The plant hormone analysis was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport of the Czech Republic (the National Program for Sustainability I, grant no. LO1204) and the internal Grant Agency of Palacký University (IGA_PrF_2017_010; Ja.S., Ji.S., and O.N.).

[OPEN]

Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

References

  1. Abdallah C, Valot B, Guillier C, Mounier A, Balliau T, Zivy M, van Tuinen D, Renaut J, Wipf D, Dumas-Gaudot E, et al. (2014) The membrane proteome of Medicago truncatula roots displays qualitative and quantitative changes in response to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. J Proteomics 108: 354–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15: 63–78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Achnine L, Huhman DV, Farag MA, Sumner LW, Blount JW, Dixon RA (2005) Genomics-based selection and functional characterization of triterpene glycosyltransferases from the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J 41: 875–887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adolfsson L, Solymosi K, Andersson MX, Keresztes Á, Uddling J, Schoefs B, Spetea C (2015) Mycorrhiza symbiosis increases the surface for sunlight capture in Medicago truncatula for better photosynthetic production. PLoS ONE 10: e0115314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aleman F, Yazaki J, Lee M, Takahashi Y, Kim AY, Li Z, Kinoshita T, Ecker JR, Schroeder JI (2016) An ABA-increased interaction of the PYL6 ABA receptor with MYC2 transcription factor: a putative link of ABA and JA signaling. Sci Rep 6: 28941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aliferis KA, Chamoun R, Jabaji S (2015) Metabolic responses of willow (Salix purpurea L.) leaves to mycorrhization as revealed by mass spectrometry and 1H NMR spectroscopy metabolite profiling. Front Plant Sci 6: 344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ames BN. (1966) Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. Methods Enzymol 8: 115–118 [Google Scholar]
  8. An JP, Li HH, Song LQ, Su L, Liu X, You CX, Wang XF, Hao YJ (2016) The molecular cloning and functional characterization of MdMYC2, a bHLH transcription factor in apple. Plant Physiol Biochem 108: 24–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arnaud N, Murgia I, Boucherez J, Briat JF, Cellier F, Gaymard F (2006) An iron-induced nitric oxide burst precedes ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation for Arabidopsis AtFer1 ferritin gene expression. J Biol Chem 281: 23579–23588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Arosio P, Ingrassia R, Cavadini P (2009) Ferritins: a family of molecules for iron storage, antioxidation and more. Biochim Biophys Acta 1790: 589–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baier MC, Keck M, Gödde V, Niehaus K, Küster H, Hohnjec N (2010) Knockdown of the symbiotic sucrose synthase MtSucS1 affects arbuscule maturation and maintenance in mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 152: 1000–1014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barrett T, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Soboleva A, Tomashevsky M, Edgar R (2007) NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D760–D765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Benjamin Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57: 289–300 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cameron DD, Neal AL, van Wees SCM, Ton J (2013) Mycorrhiza-induced resistance: more than the sum of its parts? Trends Plant Sci 18: 539–545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng X, Ruyter-Spira C, Bouwmeester H (2013) The interaction between strigolactones and other plant hormones in the regulation of plant development. Front Plant Sci 4: 199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chugh A, Ray A, Gupta JB (2003) Squalene epoxidase as hypocholesterolemic drug target revisited. Prog Lipid Res 42: 37–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook DR. (1999) Medicago truncatula: a model in the making! Curr Opin Plant Biol 2: 301–304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cortleven A, Schmülling T (2015) Regulation of chloroplast development and function by cytokinin. J Exp Bot 66: 4999–5013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Daher Z, Recorbet G, Solymosi K, Wienkoop S, Mounier A, Morandi D, Lherminier J, Wipf D, Dumas-Gaudot E, Schoefs B (2017) Changes in plastid proteome and structure in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots display a nutrient starvation signature. Physiol Plant 159: 13–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Deguchi Y, Banba M, Shimoda Y, Chechetka SA, Suzuri R, Okusako Y, Ooki Y, Toyokura K, Suzuki A, Uchiumi T, et al. (2007) Transcriptome profiling of Lotus japonicus roots during arbuscular mycorrhiza development and comparison with that of nodulation. DNA Res 14: 117–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ding L, Xu H, Yi H, Yang L, Kong Z, Zhang L, Xue S, Jia H, Ma Z (2011) Resistance to hemi-biotrophic F. graminearum infection is associated with coordinated and ordered expression of diverse defense signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 6: e19008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dobrev PI, Kamínek M (2002) Fast and efficient separation of cytokinins from auxin and abscisic acid and their purification using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr A 950: 21–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Doidy J, van Tuinen D, Lamotte O, Corneillat M, Alcaraz G, Wipf D (2012) The Medicago truncatula sucrose transporter family: characterization and implication of key members in carbon partitioning towards arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mol Plant 5: 1346–1358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dombrecht B, Xue GP, Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Ross JJ, Reid JB, Fitt GP, Sewelam N, Schenk PM, Manners JM, et al. (2007) MYC2 differentially modulates diverse jasmonate-dependent functions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 2225–2245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Everett J, Céspedes E, Shelford LR, Exley C, Collingwood JF, Dobson J, van der Laan G, Jenkins CA, Arenholz E, Telling ND (2014) Ferrous iron formation following the co-aggregation of ferric iron and the Alzheimer’s disease peptide β-amyloid (1-42). J R Soc Interface 11: 20140165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fernie AR, Stitt M (2012) On the discordance of metabolomics with proteomics and transcriptomics: coping with increasing complexity in logic, chemistry, and network interactions scientific correspondence. Plant Physiol 158: 1139–1145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Finkelstein R. (2013) Abscisic acid synthesis and response. The Arabidopsis Book 11: e0166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fiorilli V, Catoni M, Miozzi L, Novero M, Accotto GP, Lanfranco L (2009) Global and cell-type gene expression profiles in tomato plants colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol 184: 975–987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Floková K, Tarkowská D, Miersch O, Strnad M, Wasternack C, Novák O (2014) UHPLC-MS/MS based target profiling of stress-induced phytohormones. Phytochemistry 105: 147–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Floss DS, Hause B, Lange PR, Küster H, Strack D, Walter MH (2008) Knock-down of the MEP pathway isogene 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase 2 inhibits formation of arbuscular mycorrhiza-induced apocarotenoids, and abolishes normal expression of mycorrhiza-specific plant marker genes. Plant J 56: 86–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fukushima EO, Seki H, Sawai S, Suzuki M, Ohyama K, Saito K, Muranaka T (2013) Combinatorial biosynthesis of legume natural and rare triterpenoids in engineered yeast. Plant Cell Physiol 54: 740–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fusconi A. (2014) Regulation of root morphogenesis in arbuscular mycorrhizae: what role do fungal exudates, phosphate, sugars and hormones play in lateral root formation? Ann Bot (Lond) 113: 19–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gasperini D, Chauvin A, Acosta IF, Kurenda A, Stolz S, Chételat A, Wolfender JL, Farmer EE (2015) Axial and radial oxylipin transport. Plant Physiol 169: 2244–2254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gehrig H, Schüssler A, Kluge M (1996) Geosiphon pyriforme, a fungus forming endocytobiosis with Nostoc (cyanobacteria), is an ancestral member of the Glomales: evidence by SSU rRNA analysis. J Mol Evol 43: 71–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gerlach N, Schmitz J, Polatajko A, Schlüter U, Fahnenstich H, Witt S, Fernie AR, Uroic K, Scholz U, Sonnewald U, et al. (2015) An integrated functional approach to dissect systemic responses in maize to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1591–1612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gholami A, De Geyter N, Pollier J, Goormachtig S, Goossens A (2014) Natural product biosynthesis in Medicago species. Nat Prod Rep 31: 356–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gomez SK, Cox MM, Bede JC, Inoue K, Alborn HT, Tumlinson JH, Korth KL (2005) Lepidopteran herbivory and oral factors induce transcripts encoding novel terpene synthases in Medicago truncatula. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 58: 114–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Grunwald U, Guo W, Fischer K, Isayenkov S, Ludwig-Müller J, Hause B, Yan X, Küster H, Franken P (2009) Overlapping expression patterns and differential transcript levels of phosphate transporter genes in arbuscular mycorrhizal, Pi-fertilised and phytohormone-treated Medicago truncatula roots. Planta 229: 1023–1034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Guether M, Neuhäuser B, Balestrini R, Dynowski M, Ludewig U, Bonfante P (2009) A mycorrhizal-specific ammonium transporter from Lotus japonicus acquires nitrogen released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Physiol 150: 73–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Güimil S, Chang HS, Zhu T, Sesma A, Osbourn A, Roux C, Ioannidis V, Oakeley EJ, Docquier M, Descombes P, et al. (2005) Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 8066–8070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gullberg J, Jonsson P, Nordström A, Sjöström M, Moritz T (2004) Design of experiments: an efficient strategy to identify factors influencing extraction and derivatization of Arabidopsis thaliana samples in metabolomic studies with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 331: 283–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Harrison MJ, Dixon RA (1994) Spatial patterns of expression of flavonoid/isoflavonoid pathway genes during interactions between roots of Medicago truncatula and the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme. Plant J 6: 9–20 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hewitt EJ. (1966) Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition, Ed 2 Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK [Google Scholar]
  44. Hohnjec N, Vieweg MF, Pühler A, Becker A, Küster H (2005) Overlaps in the transcriptional profiles of Medicago truncatula roots inoculated with two different Glomus fungi provide insights into the genetic program activated during arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol 137: 1283–1301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hou X, Rivers J, León P, McQuinn RP, Pogson BJ (2016) Synthesis and function of apocarotenoid signals in plants. Trends Plant Sci 21: 792–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Isayenkov S, Mrosk C, Stenzel I, Strack D, Hause B (2005) Suppression of allene oxide cyclase in hairy roots of Medicago truncatula reduces jasmonate levels and the degree of mycorrhization with Glomus intraradices. Plant Physiol 139: 1401–1410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jaakola L. (2013) New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci 18: 477–483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jia Z, Tang MC, Wu JM (1999) The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64: 555–559 [Google Scholar]
  49. Jiang JR, Yuan S, Ding JF, Zhu SC, Xu HD, Chen T, Cong XD, Xu WP, Ye H, Dai YJ (2008) Conversion of puerarin into its 7-O-glycoside derivatives by Microbacterium oxydans (CGMCC 1788) to improve its water solubility and pharmacokinetic properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81: 647–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jin CW, Ye YQ, Zheng SJ (2014) An underground tale: contribution of microbial activity to plant iron acquisition via ecological processes. Ann Bot (Lond) 113: 7–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Journet EP, van Tuinen D, Gouzy J, Crespeau H, Carreau V, Farmer MJ, Niebel A, Schiex T, Jaillon O, Chatagnier O, et al. (2002) Exploring root symbiotic programs in the model legume Medicago truncatula using EST analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 5579–5592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kakar K, Wandrey M, Czechowski T, Gaertner T, Scheible WR, Stitt M, Torres-Jerez I, Xiao Y, Redman JC, Wu HC, et al. (2008) A community resource for high-throughput quantitative RT-PCR analysis of transcription factor gene expression in Medicago truncatula. Plant Methods 4: 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kazan K, Manners JM (2013) MYC2: the master in action. Mol Plant 6: 686–703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim SA, Punshon T, Lanzirotti A, Li L, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Kaplan J, Guerinot ML (2006) Localization of iron in Arabidopsis seed requires the vacuolar membrane transporter VIT1. Science 314: 1295–1298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kobayashi T, Nishizawa NK (2012) Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 131–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kudo T, Kiba T, Sakakibara H (2010) Metabolism and long-distance translocation of cytokinins. J Integr Plant Biol 52: 53–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Landgraf R, Schaarschmidt S, Hause B (2012) Repeated leaf wounding alters the colonization of Medicago truncatula roots by beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms. Plant Cell Environ 35: 1344–1357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Larose G, Chenevert R, Moutoglis P, Gagne S, Piche Y, Vierheilig H (2002) Flavonoid levels in roots of Medicago sativa are modulated by the developmental stage of the symbiosis and the root colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. J Plant Physiol 159: 1329–1339 [Google Scholar]
  59. León Morcillo RJ, Ocampo JA, García Garrido JM (2012) Plant 9-LOX oxylipin metabolism in response to arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Signal Behav 7: 1584–1588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Li J, Dai X, Liu T, Zhao PX (2012) LegumeIP: an integrative database for comparative genomics and transcriptomics of model legumes. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D1221–D1229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Liu J, Blaylock LA, Endre G, Cho J, Town CD, VandenBosch KA, Harrison MJ (2003) Transcript profiling coupled with spatial expression analyses reveals genes involved in distinct developmental stages of an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell 15: 2106–2123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu J, Maldonado-Mendoza I, Lopez-Meyer M, Cheung F, Town CD, Harrison MJ (2007) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is accompanied by local and systemic alterations in gene expression and an increase in disease resistance in the shoots. Plant J 50: 529–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. López-Ráez JA, Verhage A, Fernández I, García JM, Azcón-Aguilar C, Flors V, Pozo MJ (2010) Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway. J Exp Bot 61: 2589–2601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Luo ZB, Janz D, Jiang X, Göbel C, Wildhagen H, Tan Y, Rennenberg H, Feussner I, Polle A (2009) Upgrading root physiology for stress tolerance by ectomycorrhizas: insights from metabolite and transcriptional profiling into reprogramming for stress anticipation. Plant Physiol 151: 1902–1917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mira L, Fernandez MT, Santos M, Rocha R, Florêncio MH, Jennings KR (2002) Interactions of flavonoids with iron and copper ions: a mechanism for their antioxidant activity. Free Radic Res 36: 1199–1208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Miransari M, Abrishamchi A, Khoshbakht K, Niknam V (2014) Plant hormones as signals in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Crit Rev Biotechnol 34: 123–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Suzuki N, Miller G, Tognetti VB, Vandepoele K, Gollery M, Shulaev V, Van Breusegem F (2011) ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci 16: 300–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Morita M, Shibuya M, Kushiro T, Masuda K, Ebizuka Y (2000) Molecular cloning and functional expression of triterpene synthases from pea (Pisum sativum) new alpha-amyrin-producing enzyme is a multifunctional triterpene synthase. Eur J Biochem 267: 3453–3460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mou W, Li D, Luo Z, Mao L, Ying T (2015) Transcriptomic analysis reveals possible influences of ABA on secondary metabolism of pigments, flavonoids and antioxidants in tomato fruit during ripening. PLoS ONE 10: e0129598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mouradov A, Spangenberg G (2014) Flavonoids: a metabolic network mediating plants adaptation to their real estate. Front Plant Sci 5: 620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Javaid A, Ashraf M (2014) The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol Adv 32: 429–448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Naoumkina MA, He X, Dixon RA (2008) Elicitor-induced transcription factors for metabolic reprogramming of secondary metabolism in Medicago truncatula. BMC Plant Biol 8: 132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nesi N, Jond C, Debeaujon I, Caboche M, Lepiniec L (2001) The Arabidopsis TT2 gene encodes an R2R3 MYB domain protein that acts as a key determinant for proanthocyanidin accumulation in developing seed. Plant Cell 13: 2099–2114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Nishio JN, Abadía J, Terry N (1985) Chlorophyll-proteins and electron transport during iron nutrition-mediated chloroplast development. Plant Physiol 78: 296–299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Novák O, Hényková E, Sairanen I, Kowalczyk M, Pospíšil T, Ljung K (2012) Tissue-specific profiling of the Arabidopsis thaliana auxin metabolome. Plant J 72: 523–536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Orino K, Lehman L, Tsuji Y, Ayaki H, Torti SV, Torti FM (2001) Ferritin and the response to oxidative stress. Biochem J 357: 241–247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Plaza M, Pozzo T, Liu J, Gulshan Ara KZ, Turner C, Nordberg Karlsson E (2014) Substituent effects on in vitro antioxidizing properties, stability, and solubility in flavonoids. J Agric Food Chem 62: 3321–3333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rasmussen L, Toftlund H (1986) Phosphate compounds as iron chelators in animal cell cultures. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 22: 177–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rattanakon S, Ghan R, Gambetta GA, Deluc LG, Schlauch KA, Cramer GR (2016) Abscisic acid transcriptomic signaling varies with grapevine organ. BMC Plant Biol 16: 72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ravet K, Touraine B, Boucherez J, Briat JF, Gaymard F, Cellier F (2009) Ferritins control interaction between iron homeostasis and oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant J 57: 400–412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Redecker D, Schüssler A, Stockinger H, Stürmer SL, Morton JB, Walker C (2013) An evidence-based consensus for the classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). Mycorrhiza 23: 515–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rivas-San Vicente M, Plasencia J (2011) Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. J Exp Bot 62: 3321–3338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rooney DC, Killham K, Bending GD, Baggs E, Weih M, Hodge A (2009) Mycorrhizas and biomass crops: opportunities for future sustainable development. Trends Plant Sci 14: 542–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sakakibara H. (2006) Cytokinins: activity, biosynthesis, and translocation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 431–449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Scervino JM, Ponce MA, Erra-Bassells R, Vierheilig H, Ocampo JA, Godeas A (2005) Flavonoids exhibit fungal species and genus specific effects on the presymbiotic growth of Gigaspora and Glomus. Mycol Res 109: 789–794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM (1998) Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol 116: 447–453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Schliemann W, Ammer C, Strack D (2008) Metabolite profiling of mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Phytochemistry 69: 112–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Schnepf A, Roose T, Schweiger P (2008) Impact of growth and uptake patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant phosphorus uptake: a modelling study. Plant Soil 312: 85–99 [Google Scholar]
  89. Schussler A, Schwarzott D, Walker C (2001) A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution. Mycol Res 105: 1413–1421 [Google Scholar]
  90. Schweiger R, Baier MC, Müller C (2014a) Arbuscular mycorrhiza-induced shifts in foliar metabolism and photosynthesis mirror the developmental stage of the symbiosis and are only partly driven by improved phosphate uptake. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 27: 1403–1412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Schweiger R, Baier MC, Persicke M, Müller C (2014b) High specificity in plant leaf metabolic responses to arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nat Commun 5: 3886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shan X, Zhang Y, Peng W, Wang Z, Xie D (2009) Molecular mechanism for jasmonate-induction of anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 60: 3849–3860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Siciliano V, Genre A, Balestrini R, Cappellazzo G, deWit PJGM, Bonfante P (2007) Transcriptome analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal roots during development of the prepenetration apparatus. Plant Physiol 144: 1455–1466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Smith SE, Jakobsen I, Grønlund M, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 156: 1050–1057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Smith SE, Smith FA, Jakobsen I (2004) Functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: the contribution of the mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal responses in growth or total P uptake. New Phytol 162: 511–524 [Google Scholar]
  96. Song YY, Ye M, Li C, He X, Zhu-Salzman K, Wang RL, Su YJ, Luo SM, Zeng RS (2014) Hijacking common mycorrhizal networks for herbivore-induced defence signal transfer between tomato plants. Sci Rep 4: 3915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Spíchal L. (2012) Cytokinins: recent news and views of evolutionally old molecules. Funct Plant Biol 39: 267–284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Stookey LL. (1970) Ferrozine: a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem 42: 779 [Google Scholar]
  99. Stumpe M, Carsjens JG, Stenzel I, Göbel C, Lang I, Pawlowski K, Hause B, Feussner I (2005) Lipid metabolism in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Phytochemistry 66: 781–791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Suzuki H, Achnine L, Xu R, Matsuda SPT, Dixon RA (2002) A genomics approach to the early stages of triterpene saponin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant J 32: 1033–1048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Svačinová J, Novák O, Plačková L, Lenobel R, Holík J, Strnad M, Doležal K (2012) A new approach for cytokinin isolation from Arabidopsis tissues using miniaturized purification: pipette tip solid-phase extraction. Plant Methods 8: 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Takagi H, Ishiga Y, Watanabe S, Konishi T, Egusa M, Akiyoshi N, Matsuura T, Mori IC, Hirayama T, Kaminaka H, et al. (2016) Allantoin, a stress-related purine metabolite, can activate jasmonate signaling in a MYC2-regulated and abscisic acid-dependent manner. J Exp Bot 67: 2519–2532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Takeda K. (2006) Blue metal complex pigments involved in blue flower color. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 82: 142–154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Thimmappa R, Geisler K, Louveau T, O’Maille P, Osbourn A (2014) Triterpene biosynthesis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65: 225–257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Tholl D. (2015) Biosynthesis and biological functions of terpenoids in plants. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 148: 63–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Trouvelot A, Fardeau JC, Plenchette C, Gianinazzi S, Gianinazzapearson V (1986) Nutritional balance and symbiotic expression in mycorrhizal wheat. Physiol Veg 24: 300 [Google Scholar]
  107. Trygg J, Wold S (2002) Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J Chemometr 16: 119–128 [Google Scholar]
  108. Valderrama JC. (1981) The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in natural waters. Mar Chem 10: 109–122 [Google Scholar]
  109. Vanstraelen M, Benková E (2012) Hormonal interactions in the regulation of plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28: 463–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Vierheilig H, Coughlan AP, Wyss U, Piche Y (1998) Ink and vinegar, a simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 5004–5007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Walter MH, Floss DS, Strack D (2010) Apocarotenoids: hormones, mycorrhizal metabolites and aroma volatiles. Planta 232: 1–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wasternack C, Hause B (2013) Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot (Lond) 111: 1021–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjöström L, Mellerowicz EJ, Edlund U, Shockcor JP, Gottfries J, Moritz T, Trygg J (2008) Visualization of GC/TOF-MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Anal Chem 80: 115–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wulf A, Manthey K, Doll J, Perlick AM, Linke B, Bekel T, Meyer F, Franken P, Küster H, Krajinski F (2003) Transcriptional changes in response to arbuscular mycorrhiza development in the model plant Medicago truncatula. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16: 306–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Xiong L, Zhu JK (2003) Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 133: 29–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Yan Y, Borrego E, Kolomiets MV (2013) Jasmonate biosynthesis, perception and function in plant development and stress responses. In Baez PRV, ed, Lipid Metabolism. InTech Rijeka, pp. 393–442 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES