Abstract
Background
A solitary fibrous tumour is a rare, mainly benign spindle cell mesenchymal tumour most commonly originating from the pleura. An intrapericardial location of a solitary fibrous tumour is extremely unusual. We present a case of an asymptomatic patient with a slow-growing massive benign cardiac solitary fibrous tumour.
Case presentation
A 37-year-old asymptomatic female patient was referred to our hospital with an enlarged cardiac silhouette found on her screening chest X-ray. The echocardiographic examination revealed pericardial effusion and an inhomogeneous mobile mass located in the pericardial sac around the left ventricle. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MRI) examination showed an intrapericardial, semilunar-shaped mass attached to the pulmonary trunk with an intermediate signal intensity on proton density-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted spectral fat saturation inversion recovery images. First-pass perfusion and early and late gadolinium-enhanced images showed a vascularized mass with septated, patchy, inhomogeneous late enhancement. Coronary computed tomography angiography revealed no invasion of the coronaries. Based on the retrospectively analysed screening chest X-rays, the mass had started to form at least 7 years earlier. Complete resection of the tumour with partial resection of the pulmonary trunk was performed. Histological evaluation of the septated, cystic mass revealed tumour cells forming an irregular patternless pattern; immunohistochemically, the cells tested positive for vimentin, CD34, CD99 and STAT6 but negative for keratin (AE1-AE3), CD31 and S100. Thus, the diagnosis of an intrapericardial solitary fibrous tumour was established. There has been no recurrence for 3 years based on the regular MRI follow-up.
Conclusion
Intrapericardial SFTs, showing slow growth dynamics, can present with massive extent even in completely asymptomatic patients. MRI is exceedingly useful for characterizing intrapericardial masses, allowing precise surgical planning, and is reliable for long-term follow up.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3574-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Solitary fibrous tumour, Intrapericardial localization, Multimodality imaging, Long term follow-up, Case report
Background
A solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) is a rare primary tumour most commonly originating from mesenchymal tissue of the pleura. Complete surgical resection is the main treatment if possible. Histological appearance shows spindle-shaped cells and collagen fibres. Immunohistochemical features are vimentin, CD34, CD99 positivity and S-100 protein negativity [1]. Although the majority of SFTs generally exhibit clinically benign behaviour, 10–30% of SFTs have been associated with local recurrence or histologic malignancy [2, 3]. We have only limited data regarding the manifestation and behaviour of rare extrapleural forms such as cardiac SFT [4].
Case presentation
A 37-year-old asymptomatic female patient was referred to our hospital with an enlarged cardiac silhouette found on her screening chest X-ray (Fig. 1, panel d). She had no history of cardiovascular disease. She had a spontaneous abortion 3 years previously, and she is a mother of three children. She has a positive family history of cardiovascular diseases and cancer (lung adenocarcinoma and brain tumour). Physical examination revealed distant heart sounds, a regular rate and rhythm. The echocardiographic examination revealed pericardial effusion and an inhomogeneous mobile mass located in the pericardial sac around the left ventricle (Fig. 2, Additional file 1). Subsequently, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, which showed an intrapericardial, semilunar-shaped mass with a size of 10 × 4 × 9 cm attached to the pulmonary trunk surrounding the aortic root, left atrium and left ventricle (Fig. 3). The tumour had well-demarcated margins and did not invade the blood vessels or myocardium. The caudal part of the tumour was mobile, while its cranial part was fixed to the pulmonary trunk (Additional file 2). The MRI scan detected intermediate signal intensity on proton density-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted spectral fat saturation inversion recovery (SPIR) images (Fig. 3, panel e, f). Both first-pass perfusion and early and late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) images showed that the mass was vascularized and showed septated, patchy, inhomogeneous LGE (Fig. 3, panel g, h). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed to see whether the coronary arteries were affected. The coronary CTA proved that coronaries were not invaded by the tumour (Fig. 4). We have evaluated the previous screening chest X-rays of the patient that were acquired during the past 10 years. Based on these chest X-rays, we can conclude that the mass had started to form at least 7 years ago (Fig. 1). No abnormalities were found by the abdominal ultrasound examination, the results of hormone tests were normal, and a hormone-secreting nature of the tumour was excluded. Open heart surgery was indicated through median sternotomy (Fig. 5, panel a, b). The intraoperative findings confirmed the MRI and coronary CTA results. The tumour was intrapericardial, attached to the lateral wall of the pulmonary trunk, 2 cm distal from the commissures of the pulmonary valve. The tumour did not invade any other structures of the heart. Complete resection of the tumour with partial resection of the pulmonary trunk was performed (Fig. 5, panel c) using cardiopulmonary bypass. The pulmonary trunk was reconstructed with a round-shaped bovine pericardial patch (Fig. 5, panel b). The intra- and postoperative course were uneventful. Histological evaluation of the septated, cystic mass revealed tumour cells forming an irregular pattern, the so-called “patternless pattern” (Fig. 6, panel a, b). Immunohistochemically, the cells tested positive for vimentin, CD34, CD99 and STAT6 (Fig. 6, panel c-f) but negative for keratin (AE1-AE3), CD31 and S100. Thus, the diagnosis of a primary cardiac solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) was established. The tumour was classified as non-malignant because of the lack of increased mitotic activity, an intact capsule and no sign of vascular invasion. Regular and long-term clinical and MRI follow-up were indicated (every 6 months in the first year, later annually) because of the risk of late local recurrence. At the 3-year follow-up, the patient had no symptoms, and MRI did not show recurrence of the tumour (Fig. 7). The patient’s clinical history is summarized in a timeline, prepared in accordance with CARE guideline (Additional file 3).
Discussion and conclusions
A solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) is a rare spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasm that most commonly originates from the pleura, but for which extrapleural anatomic locations have also been reported (e.g., intraabdominal, meningeal, extracranial of the head and neck, and soft tissue SFT) [3, 5]. Primary cardiac SFTs are extremely rare; so far, there are only 11 cases reported in the English literature [6–16]. Additionally, primary pericardial SFT was mentioned in four publications without any specific information regarding the exact location, clinical data, patient symptoms or prognosis [17–20]. The case reports of primary intrapericardial SFTs reported in the literature are summarized in Table 1. Based on limited data about intrapericardial SFTs, it usually affects middle-aged patients, showing no gender-specific difference in incidence. Only two of them were diagnosed as malignant; in two cases, no information was available about the malignancy. Other than two asymptomatic patients with an incidental diagnosis, all of the reported patients with primary cardiac SFTs were symptomatic. Symptoms may depend on the extent and anatomic location of the tumour, most commonly dyspnoea, fatigue, chest discomfort/distress, palpitation, syncope or peripheral oedema.
Table 1.
Authors | Year | Age | Sex | Symptoms | Origin | Tumour imaging | Malignancy | Follow-up length (imaging modality) | Immuno-histochemical marker | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bortolotti U et al. [6] | 1992 | 60 | M | fatigue, chest discomfort, dyspnoea | AAo, PT | X-ray, echo, CT | Benign | 9 m (X-ray, echo) | vimentin+ |
2 | Seqawa D et al. [7] | 1995 | 50 | F | dyspnoea, palpitation | RV | X-ray, CT, MRI |
NA | 19 m (NA) | vimentin+ |
3 | Flemming P et al. [8] | 1996 | 53 | F | NA | LV | NA | NA | died port HTX | CD34 + vimentin + |
4 | Andreani SM et al. [9] | 1998 | 60 | M | exertional dyspnoea | NA | X-ray, CT | Benign | 4 y (NA) | NA |
5 | Corgnati G et al. [10] | 2004 | 30 | M | peripheral oedema | AAo, PT | X-ray, echo CT, MRI |
Benign | 18 m (NA) | NA |
6 | Bothe W et al. [11] | 2005 | 39 | F | palpitation | RA | echo | Benign | 12 m (echo) | CD34 + vimentin + |
7 | Croti UA et al. [12] | 2008 | 5 m | M | asymptomatic | LA | X-ray, echo | Benign | non-CV death after 6 m (NA) | CD34 + |
8 | Zhao XG et al. [13] | 2012 | 55 | M | chest distress, dyspnoea | RA | X-ray, CT | Malignant | died after surgery | CD34 + |
9 | Taguchi S et al. [14] | 2013 | 49 | F | asymptomatic | LV | CT, MRI | Malignant | NA | CD34 + vimentin + CD99 + |
10 | Bianchi G et al. [15] | 2013 | 68 | F | dyspnoea, fatigue | LV | echo, CT, MRI | Benign | 12 m (echo) | CD34 + vimentin + Bcl2 + |
11 | Tamenishi A et al. [16] | 2013 | 30 | F | syncope | left PA | X-ray, CT | Benign | 6y (NA) | CD34 + |
12 | Our case | 2017 | 37 | F | asymptomatic | PT | X-ray, echo, CT, MRI |
Benign | 3y (MRI) | CD34 + vimentin + CD99 + STAT6 + |
M male, F female, NA no data available, AAo Ascending aorta, PT pulmonary trunk, RA right atrium, LA left atrium, LV left ventricle, PA pulmonary artery, m months, y years
As a first-line imaging modality, chest X-ray typically shows marked cardiomegaly, and echocardiography could verify an intrapericardial mass and pericardial effusion. MRI can provide additional information about the morphology, location and extent of intrapericardial masses, and it can help to further characterize the tumour tissue. In general, MRI characteristics of SFT vary because of the altering degree of vascularity, cystic degeneration, haemorrhage and necrosis. SFTs usually show intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and variable signal intensity on T2-weighted images [2]. In our case, the detailed assessment of the tumour using various MRI sequences and contrast administration showed specific characteristics of extrapleural SFTs including septated, patchy, inhomogeneous LGE. Coronary CT angiography also has an added value in the precise evaluation of the relation with the coronary arteries.
SFT shows characteristic CD34 expression in 95% of the cases, and CD99 can also be positive [5]. However, these markers are not specific. According to recent studies, STAT6 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker of SFT [21]. Most of the intrapericardial SFTs confirmed vimentin and CD34 positivity; specific STAT6 immunostaining was not yet revealed in intrapericardial SFTs.
Our case confirms the conjecture that intrapericardial SFTs are typically slow-growing masses because, according to the consecutive X-ray images, the intrapericardial mass started to form at least 7 years ago.
Although the majority of SFTs of the thorax are benign and are cured by complete resection, 10–20% are locally aggressive or malignant [22]. Malignant histology is strongly associated with recurrence, but some benign SFTs still behave aggressively. The literature data imply a higher risk for the recurrence of extrapleural than that for pleuropulmonary SFT [23]; many recurrent SFTs do not respond to treatment. This underscores the need for continued long-term follow-up using a high-resolution, non-invasive imaging technique. In the reported cases, X-ray or echocardiography was used during follow-up, and only two intrapericardial SFT cases were reported with a follow-up longer than 2 years [9, 16]. An international registry would be needed to have more detailed information based on long-term follow-up regarding the recurrence tendency of intrapericardial SFTs.
Although intrapericardial SFT is an extremely rare condition, the slow-growth, considerable size of the tumour, and its typical MRI appearance can raise the suspicion of SFT. The “patternless pattern” histopathological finding, vimentin, CD34 and CD99 positivity and specific STAT6 immunostaining can be valuable indicators of this rare mesenchymal tumour. Owing to the high recurrence rate of extrapleural SFTs, long-term follow-up is crucial, and magnetic resonance imaging is a reliable method for the early detection of local recurrence.
Additional files
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
There was no funding for this paper.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Abbreviations
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- SFT
Solitary fibrous tumour
Authors’ contributions
CC was the primary author of the text and provided the images. HV was the primary physician during the patient’s inpatient stay, conceived the report, provided the images and acted as the chief editor. PMH and BM conceived the report and provided the images. MP, EB, NS, AT, IC, DB, ZS and ZSz were involved in the patient’s care as well as the editing and overseeing of the text. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable as this is not a study.
Consent for publication
Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. The case report was written according to the CARE guideline. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3574-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Contributor Information
Csilla Czimbalmos, Email: csilla.czimbalmos@gmail.com.
Ibolya Csecs, Email: ibolyacsecs@gmail.com.
Miklos Polos, Email: miklospolos@gmail.com.
Elektra Bartha, Email: bartha_elektra@index.hu.
Nikolette Szucs, Email: szucs@bel2.sote.hu.
Attila Toth, Email: atoth@atoth.sote.hu.
Pal Maurovich-Horvat, Email: maurovich.horvat@gmail.com.
David Becker, Email: becdavid@gmail.com.
Zoltan Sapi, Email: sapi.zoltan.dr@gmail.com.
Zoltan Szabolcs, Email: sziv.szabolcs@gmail.com.
Bela Merkely, Email: merkely.bela@gmail.com.
Hajnalka Vago, Phone: +36-20-825-8058, Email: vagoha@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Geramizadeh B, Marzban M, Churg A. Role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor, a review. Iran J Pathol. 2016;11(3):195–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sung SH, Chang JW, Kim J, Lee KS, Han J, Park SI. Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura: surgical outcome and clinical course. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(1):303–307. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Demicco EG, Park MS, Araujo DM, Fox PS, Bassett RL, Pollock RE, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathological study of 110 cases and proposed risk assessment model. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1298–1306. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taguchi S. Primary Cardiac Solitary Fibrous Tumors. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:329–331. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.15-00193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hasegawa T, Matsuno Y, Shimoda T, Hasegawa F, Sano T, Hirohashi S. Extrathoracic solitary fibrous tumors: their histological variability and potentially aggressive behavior. Hum Pathol. 1999;30(12):1464–1473. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90169-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bortolotti U, Calabro F, Loy M, Fasoli G, Altavilla G, Marchese D. Giant intrapericardial solitary fibrous tumor. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1219–1220. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90106-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Segawa D, Yoshizu H, Haga Y, Hatori N, Tanaka S, Aida S. Successful operation for solitary fibrous tumor of the epicardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:1246–1248. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70210-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Flemming P, Maschek H, Werner M, Kreft A, Graeter T, Georgii A. Solitary fibrous tumor of the epicardium. Pathologe. 1996;17:139–144. doi: 10.1007/s002920050147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Andreani SM, Tavecchio L, Giardini R, Bedini AV. Extrapericardial solitary fibrous tumour of the pericardium. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:98–100. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(98)00133-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Corgnati G, Drago S, Bonamini R, Trevi GP, Carra R, Di Summa M. Solitary fibrous tumor of the pericardium presenting itself as a pericardial effusion and right ventricular obstruction. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;45:393–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bothe W, Goebel H, Kunze M, Beyersdorf F. Right atrial solitary fibrous tumor - a new cardiac neoplasm? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4:396–397. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.108068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Croti UA, Braile DM, Moscardini AC, Cury PM. Solitary fibrous tumor in a child’s heart. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2008;23:139–141. doi: 10.1590/S0102-76382008000100025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao XG, Wang H, Wang YL, Chen G, Jiang GN. Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the right atrium. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344(5):422–425. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318259b317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Taguchi S, Mory A, Yamabe K, Suzuki R, Nishizawa K, Hasegawa I, et al. Malignant Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Left Ventricular Epicardium. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1447–1450. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bianchi G, Ferrarini M, Matteucci M, et al. Giant solitary fibrous tumor of the epicardium causing reversible heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:49–51. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tamenishi A, Matsumura Y, Okamoto H. Solitary fibrous tumor causing cardiac tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:319–321. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roggli VL, Kolbeck J, Sanfiliippo F, Shelburne JD. Pathology of human mesothelioma. Etiologic and diagnostic considerations. In: Rosen PP, Fecher RE, editors. Pathology annual. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1987. pp. 91–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.El-Naggar AK, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Ward R, Ordonez NG. Localized fibrous tumor of the serosal cavities. Immunohistochemical, electron-microscopic, and flow-cytometric DNA study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;92:561–565. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/92.5.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Odim J, Reehal V, Laks H, Mehta U, Fishbein MC. Surgical pathology of cardiac tumors. Two decades at an urban institution. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2003;12:267–270. doi: 10.1016/S1054-8807(03)00087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burke A, Virmani R. Classification and incidence of cardiac tumors. Tumors of the heart and great vessels. In: Burke A, Virmani R, editors. Atlas of tumor pathology. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1996. pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Doyle LA, Vivero M, Fletcher CD, Mertens F, Hornick JL. Nuclear expression of STAT6 distinguishes solitary fibrous tumour from histologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(3):390–395. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chick JF, Chauhan NR, Madan R. Solitary fibrous tumours of the thorax: nomenclature, epidemiology, radiologic and pathologic findings, differential diagnoses, and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):238–248. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wilky BA, Montgomery EA, Guzzetta AA, Ahuja N, Meyer CF. Extrathoracic location and "borderline" histology are associated with recurrence of solitary fibrous tumors after surgical resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(13):4080–4089. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3241-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.