Abstract
The interconnected PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways are commonly perturbed in cancer. Dual inhibition of these pathways by the small-molecule PI3K inhibitor pictilisib (GDC-0941) and the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib (GDC-0973) suppresses cell proliferation and induces cell death better than either single agent in several preclinical models. Using mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics, we have identified the RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF157 as a target at the intersection of PI3K and MAPK signaling. We demonstrate that RNF157 phosphorylation downstream of the PI3K and MAPK pathways influences the ubiquitination and stability of RNF157 during the cell cycle in an anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome–CDH1-dependent manner. Deletion of these phosphorylation-targeted residues on RNF157 disrupts binding to CDH1 and protects RNF157 from ubiquitination and degradation. Expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), itself a downstream target of PI3K/MAPK signaling, leads to increased phosphorylation of RNF157 on the same residues modulated by PI3K and MAPK signaling. Inhibition of PI3K and MEK in combination or of CDK2 by their respective small-molecule inhibitors reduces RNF157 phosphorylation at these residues and attenuates RNF157 interaction with CDH1 and its subsequent degradation. Knockdown of endogenous RNF157 in melanoma cells leads to late S phase and G2/M arrest and induces apoptosis, the latter further potentiated by concurrent PI3K/MEK inhibition, consistent with a role for RNF157 in the cell cycle. We propose that RNF157 serves as a novel node integrating oncogenic signaling pathways with the cell cycle machinery and promoting optimal cell cycle progression in transformed cells.
Keywords: cell cycle, cell signaling, cyclin, E3 ubiquitin ligase, melanoma, CDK2, MAPK, PIK3CA
Introduction
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and MAPK signaling cascades are involved in a wide variety of biological processes associated with cancer development, such as cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The frequent deregulation of both signaling pathways and the cross-talk between them at multiple points highlight the importance of combinatorial treatment in cancer therapy. Indeed, mounting evidence suggests co-targeting of these pathways is a promising strategy (1, 2). For example, cobimetinib (GDC-0973), a selective inhibitor of MEK, has recently been approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma in combination with the B-RAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent, selective inhibitor of class I PI3Ks, has demonstrated significant efficacy in both preclinical and clinical studies as a single agent and in combination with other inhibitors (3–5). A subset of cancers displays activation of both the PI3K and MAPK pathways; however, only a relatively small number of substrates at the interface of PI3K and MAPK signaling have been characterized.
Protein phosphorylation is one of the main control mechanisms regulating signal transduction downstream of PI3K and MAPK pathway activation. The global profiling of these networks has not been explored adequately, mainly due to technical challenges. Fortunately, recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics provide a high-throughput technology to identify and quantify phosphopeptides in complicated signaling networks (6–8). In this study, we have used label-free MS to investigate the global response of the phosphoproteome to the inhibition of PI3K, MEK, or both by the highly selective, small-molecule inhibitors pictilisib and cobimetinib in melanoma cells. This approach has uncovered the E3 ubiquitin ligase really interesting new gene (RING) finger protein 157 (RNF157)3 as a novel, common downstream phosphorylation target of both pathways. Silencing of RNF157 leads to late S and G2/M cell cycle arrest, consistent with a role for RNF157 during these cell cycle transitions in cells with PI3K/MAPK activation. Using proteomics, we have identified as putative RNF157-interacting partners several mitochondrial ribosomal and RNA-binding proteins. We demonstrate that cell cycle regulators CDK2 and CDH1 can both bind to RNF157 and regulate it in a cell cycle-dependent manner. CDK2 promotes phosphorylation of RNF157 at the same Ser660–663 residues that become phosphorylated downstream of combined PI3K and MAPK pathway activity. Phosphorylation at these same residues on RNF157 plays a promoting role for RNF157 recognition by CDH1 and its subsequent proteasomal degradation during late mitosis and early G1. These findings reveal a novel cross-talk mechanism between oncogenic signaling pathways and cell cycle components through the RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF157.
Results
Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF157 as a downstream effector of PI3K and MAPK signaling
To identify downstream effectors of the PI3K and MAPK pathways, we used the BRAFV600E mutant human melanoma cell lines A2058 and 624MEL in which both pathways are activated, and thus the combination of PI3K and MEK inhibitors maximally reduces their activity and induces cell death (supplemental Fig. S1). We measured differences in phosphorylation upon treatment of these cell lines with the PI3K inhibitor pictilisib (GDC-0941), the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib (GDC-0973), or the combination of both compounds. To this end, we used the label-free based PTMScan® method from Cell Signaling Technology (9, 10). Western blot screening of the protein lysates using AKT and MAPK phosphomotif antibodies showed evident global phosphorylation changes after treatments and confirmed the decrease of markers for PI3K or MAPK activity, including phospho-AKT, phospho-ERK1/2, and phospho-S6 (supplemental Fig. S1C). Following phosphopeptide enrichment with the MAPK and AKT phosphomotif antibodies, we applied mass spectrometric analysis as described previously (10) in the A2058 cell line (supplemental Fig. S2A) and identified 1135 phosphorylation sites from 603 proteins (supplemental Fig. S2B and supplemental Table S1).
After inhibition of both PI3K and MEK, 75 of 1045 (7%) and 105 of 1045 (10%) phosphopeptides showed up- or down-regulation, respectively (Fig. 1A). To characterize responding phosphoproteins, we applied gene set enrichment analysis using collections from the Molecular Signatures Database (11). We found that many proteins that showed increased phosphorylation after PI3K, MEK, or combination treatment were associated with the cytoskeleton (p < 0.01) (supplemental Table S2). Proteins with decreased phosphorylation after treatments were commonly involved in the cell cycle (p < 0.01), including CDK2, CDC2, and TOP2A.
Although there was a significant enrichment of phosphoproteins with known biological roles, we were more interested in phosphoproteins that had not been previously associated with PI3K or MAPK signaling. The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF157 showed substantial down-regulation of phosphorylation after MEK or PI3K inhibition and maximal blockade of phosphorylation after dual inhibition in both melanoma cell lines (Fig. 1, A–C, and supplemental Table S1). Because RNF157 is a relatively understudied E3 ubiquitin ligase belonging to the RING finger family and represents a novel effector of the PI3K and MAPK pathways, we focused on further characterizing its role. We detected several distinct RNF157 phosphopeptides by MS showing single, double, triple, or quadruple phosphorylation in the Ser660–663 region (supplemental Table S3). Western blotting with a novel phosphospecific RNF157 antibody that we generated, as described under “Materials and methods,” and validated for its specificity against pRNF157S660–663 (supplemental Fig. S2C) confirmed a rapid, time-dependent decrease in RNF157 phosphorylation after combination treatment (Fig. 1, B and C). Sequence analysis of RNF157 revealed that the identified phosphorylation sites Ser660–663 were localized adjacent to one of two putative destruction box (D-box) motifs composed of the sequence RXXLXXXXN (Fig. 1D). D-box-containing proteins play key roles in cell cycle regulation and are targeted for degradation by the APC/C E3 ligase complex. We performed siRNA knockdown of RNF157 in the presence or absence of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to evaluate the role of RNF157 in tumor cell survival and found that, whereas RNF157 knockdown modestly increased cell death compared with siControl, simultaneous treatment with siRNF157 and PI3K/MEK inhibitors led to significantly greater cell death than inhibitor treatment alone (Fig. 1E).
RNF157 is paralogous to the E3 ubiquitin ligase MGRN1 with 42.8% sequence identity, mainly in the N terminus (supplemental Fig. S3A). MGRN1 has been implicated in endosomal trafficking, prion turnover, and melanocortin-2 receptor stability (12–15). RNF157 and MGRN1 are both conserved in jawed vertebrates (supplemental Fig. S3B) and have a single co-ortholog in most eukaryotes other than fungi. Their co-ortholog in Drosophila, CG9941, interacts with the protein CG5334, whose human homolog, MKRN1, has been reported as an E3 ligase for p53 and p21 and implicated in cell cycle regulation (16). Importantly, the C-terminal tail of human RNF157, containing the Ser660–663 phosphorylation cluster we identified, is found only in eutherian mammals and not in MGRN1 (supplemental Fig. S3, A and C), suggesting a potentially unique role for this phosphorylation cluster region in mammalian RNF157. According to the secondary structure prediction programs JPred4 (17) and RONN (18), the Ser660–663 region is predicted to be a highly solvent-exposed, hydrophilic, and disordered region of RNF157 with no defined secondary structure (supplemental Fig. S3D).
Cell cycle-dependent regulation of RNF157 expression
It has been reported that RNF157 is predominantly expressed in the brain (19), but there are no reports of RNF157 expression levels in proliferating cells. Given that RNF157 contains D-box motifs characteristic of APC/C–CDH1-regulated proteins and has a distant connection to MKRN1, which is involved in cell cycle control, we wanted to evaluate the role of RNF157 in the cell cycle. We first assessed RNF157 expression via immunoblotting during cell cycle progression and observed that RNF157 levels and molecular weight fluctuate in a cell cycle-dependent manner in both A2058 and 624MEL melanoma cells (Fig. 2, A–C). Compared with unsynchronized cells, RNF157 protein levels were higher in cells arrested in G1/S and G2/M (Fig. 2A). The apparent molecular weight of RNF157 was increased in nocodazole-synchronized G2/M cells and gradually decreased as the arrested cells were released into fresh media (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the RNF157 migration pattern remained constant in nocodazole-synchronized cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 at the time of the release into fresh media (supplemental Fig. S4A). The fluctuation of RNF157 levels and migration pattern mirror those of the cell cycle regulators cyclin B1 and CDC6 during the cell cycle (Fig. 2C). Both cyclin B1 and CDC6 are substrates of the APC/C–CDH1 E3 ligase complex and are subject to phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases, including CDK2 (20, 21). Interestingly, CDK2 activation, as measured by blotting with a CDK2 Thr(P)160 antibody, was modulated with kinetics that matched RNF157 phosphorylation and protein levels (Fig. 2C). These results prompted us to hypothesize that RNF157 regulation during the cell cycle may be linked to the APC/C–CDH1 complex and to CDK2.
Role of CDH1 in RNF157 stability
As mentioned above, sequence analysis of RNF157 revealed that it contains two putative D-box motifs, one of which is localized adjacent to the identified phosphorylation sites Ser660–663 (Fig. 1D). During the cell cycle, D-box-containing proteins are regulated by the APC/C ubiquitin ligase complex via either of two substrate-recruiting proteins, CDH1 or CDC20 (22). We tested whether CDH1 or CDC20 overexpression can modulate RNF157 levels and found that overexpression of CDH1 led to a decrease in RNF157 protein levels in both A2058 and 624MEL cell lines (Fig. 3A). CDH1 overexpression in this experiment did not appear to have general effects on other cell cycle regulators, like cyclin B1, itself a APC/C–CDH1 target (supplemental Fig. S4C). Silencing of CDH1 by siRNA reduced the high levels of RNF157 ubiquitination observed in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Fig. 3B) and led to increased levels of endogenous RNF157 versus modest effects upon silencing of CDC20 (Fig. 3C). In addition, CDC20 overexpression did not affect RNF157 levels (supplemental Fig. S4B). These data support the model that CDH1, rather than CDC20, can modulate the ubiquitination and stability of RNF157, consistent with RNF157 being a putative substrate of the APC/C–CDH1 E3 ligase complex.
To identify the structural elements regulating RNF157 stability, we mutated the two canonical D-box motifs on RNF157 individually and in combination. Mutation of either D-box motif partially stabilized RNF157, whereas simultaneously mutating both D-boxes maximally enhanced RNF157 stability, making it refractory to CDH1 overexpression (Fig. 3D). Notably, D-box deficiency did not impair the interaction between RNF157 and CDH1 (supplemental Fig. S4D).
Phosphorylation of cell cycle proteins often regulates their degradation and modulates their interactions with other cell cycle components (23–25). Therefore, we explored the impact of RNF157 phosphorylation at Ser660–663 on its regulation by CDH1. We generated a phosphodeficient mutant version of RNF157 where the Ser660–663 serine cluster was deleted (Δ4S). In contrast to wild-type RNF157, the Δ4S mutant was stable in the presence of overexpressed CDH1 (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, the Δ4S mutant displayed significantly reduced ubiquitination following CDH1 overexpression (Fig. 3F) and lost the ability to interact with CDH1 (Fig. 3G). Given that these residues are predicted to lie in a disordered region (supplemental Fig. S3D), it is unlikely that their deletion would introduce a structural change that could account for these effects independently of the Ser660–663 cluster. Taken together, these data suggest that the Ser660–663 residues of RNF157 promote APC/C–CDH1-mediated RNF157 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation by promoting APC/C–CDH1/RNF157 binding, whereas RNF157 D-box motifs are dispensable for RNF157 binding to APC/C–CDH1 but are required for RNF157 degradation.
RNF157 regulation by PI3K, MEK, and CDK2 activity
Previous studies have implicated PI3K in cell cycle control through CDK2 (26–29). Because RNF157 phosphorylation coincides with CDK2 activation and downstream target regulation (Fig. 2C), we asked whether CDK2 kinase activity could modulate RNF157 Ser660–663 phosphorylation downstream of PI3K/MAPK signaling. First, we assessed the interaction between CDK2 and RNF157 in 624MEL cells overexpressing both proteins (Fig. 4A). Next, we assessed the effect of overexpressed CDK2 on the phosphorylation status of Ser660–663 in cells treated either with DMSO, two different CDK2 inhibitors, or a PI3K/MEK inhibitor combination. Compared with vector control, we detected increased phosphorylation of RNF157 upon CDK2 overexpression that was abolished by treatment with either of the CDK2 inhibitors or the PI3K/MEK inhibitor combination (Fig. 4B). This is consistent with previous reports that CDK2 activity is activated downstream of PI3K/MAPK signaling (26–29). Treatment with these inhibitors, however, also led to an apparent decrease in the total levels of RNF157, mirroring effects on CDC6, a CDK2 target and APC/C–CDH1 substrate whose stability depends on CDK2 phosphorylation (20). This may be due to the release of the negative regulation of APC/C–CDH1 by CDK2 (30) during the 6 h of inhibitor treatment. To test the effects of PI3K/MEK and CDK2 inhibitors on Ser660–663 phosphorylation in an acute system to prevent effects on total RNF157 levels, we assessed pRNF157S660–663 levels 5 min after epidermal growth factor stimulation in the absence versus presence of inhibitors. Acute EGF stimulation induced a rapid increase in pRNF157S660–663 levels, concomitant with an increase in total levels of the CDK2 substrate CDC6, whose stability is positively regulated by CDK2 phosphorylation (20) (Fig. 4C). Treatment with either the PI3K/MEK inhibitor combination or with two different CDK2 inhibitors abrogated pRNF157S660–663 levels in the absence of any change in total RNF157 levels and concomitant with a decrease in CDC6 levels as a readout for suppression of CDK2 activity (Fig. 4C). Deletion of Ser660–663 residues (Δ4S) abolished CDK2-induced RNF157 phosphorylation (Fig. 4D). These data, along with the earlier observation that CDK2 inhibition blocked pRNF157S660–663 levels upon growth factor signaling, are consistent with the conclusion that the Ser660–663 cluster that we identified as being co-regulated by the PI3K/MAPK pathways is phosphorylated downstream of CDK2 activation induced by PI3K/MEK signaling. RNF157 does not contain a consensus CDK phosphorylation motif ((S/T)PX(K/R)); therefore, the kinase phosphorylating Ser660–663 is likely a CDK2-regulated kinase rather than CDK2 itself. Interestingly, RNF157 contains a Cy (RXL) cyclin-binding motif immediately preceding Ser660 and within D-box II (Cy = 657RRL659) (31). This Cy motif is embedded within the RXXS consensus AKT motif 657RRLS660 immediately preceding the Ser660–663 cluster. The presence of a Cy motif has been shown to increase the affinity of an SPXK-containing peptide for CDK2 75–120-fold (31) and may facilitate CDK2 interaction with RNF157.
Having previously shown that the Ser660–663 cluster is required for CDH1–RNF157 complex formation and ubiquitination (Fig. 3, F and G), we tested the consequences of Ser660–663 cluster phosphorylation on the CDH1/RNF157 interaction using (a) PI3K/MEK and CDK2 inhibitors and wild-type FLAG-RNF157 and (b) a serine 660–663-to-alanine (4SA) mutant FLAG-RNF157 to block Ser660–663 phosphorylation. We found that inhibitor treatments led to decreased CDH1/RNF157 interaction, proportionally to the accompanying decreases in pRNF157S660–663 and pCDK2T160 levels; the latter is used as a readout of CDK2 activation (Fig. 4E). Serine-to-alanine substitutions of the Ser660–663 cluster led to decreased CDH1/RNF157 interaction compared with WT RNF157 (Fig. 4F), consistent with the decrease in CDH1/RNF157 binding observed after MEK/PI3K inhibitor treatment (Fig. 4E). Altogether, these data support a model in which RNF157 phosphorylation at the Ser660–663 cluster occurs downstream of CDK2 activation, induced by PI3K/MEK (26–29), and promotes RNF157/CDH1 interaction. Because some degree of RNF157/CDH1 interaction remains even when Ser660–663 phosphorylation is blocked by kinase inhibitors or Ser-to-Ala point mutations, we conclude that phosphorylation of the Ser660–663 cluster enhances the CDH1/RNF157 interaction but is not absolutely required.
Both CDH1 and CDK2 are involved in the modulation of RNF157 stability during the cell cycle
Phosphorylation of CDH1 by CDK2 blocks the binding of CDH1 to the APC/C ubiquitin ligase complex and inactivates this complex during late G1 and S phases (30). We thus investigated the binding pattern of RNF157 to both cell cycle modulators during the cell cycle. The interaction between RNF157 and CDH1 was higher in cells arrested at G2/M compared with unsynchronized cells (Fig. 5A), and both CDH1 and CDK2 could bind to RNF157 during G2/M (Fig. 5B). The binding of RNF157 to CDK2 was higher in cells arrested during G1/S compared with unsynchronized cells (Fig. 5C, left panel) and gradually decreased after cells were released into fresh media post-thymidine block (Fig. 5C, right panel). We previously showed that optimal binding of RNF157 to CDH1 requires Ser660–663 phosphorylation downstream of PI3K/MEK and CDK2 activity (Figs. 3 and 4E). However, even though RNF157 may bind to CDH1 soon after it becomes phosphorylated at Ser660–663 early on in the cell cycle and maintains high CDH1 binding during the G2/M transition, RNF157 levels appear to decrease gradually following release of melanoma cells from nocodazole-induced G2/M arrest into mitosis and G1, consistent with its degradation occurring during late mitosis and early G1 (Fig. 2C and supplemental Fig. S5). This timeline matches the reported inhibition of CDH1 activity by CDK2, occurring from G1/S until late M phase at which point CDH1 becomes active and stays active during G1 (30). Thus, we propose that CDK2 may help coordinate RNF157 stability with the cell cycle by maintaining the APC/C–CDH1 complex inactive during G1/S, S, and G2/M while at the same time promoting CDH1/RNF157 interaction via RNF157 Ser660–663 phosphorylation. As a result, RNF157 remains stable from G1/S until G2/M and able to play its role in the cell cycle but is primed to be rapidly degraded as soon as the APC/C–CDH1 complex becomes active in late M (supplemental Fig. S5).
To evaluate the role of RNF157 in the cell cycle, we next investigated the effects of RNF157 depletion on cell cycle progression. Silencing of endogenous RNF157 by two independent siRNAs increased the number of cells arrested in late S phase as well as the number of cells with a 4N DNA content, indicative of a G2/M arrest (Fig. 5, D–F). Interestingly, RNF157-depleted cell lysates showed an increase in CDK2 levels, suggesting a potentially reciprocal role of RNF157 in regulating CDK2 (Fig. 5G). This observation warrants further investigation, including the assessment of CDK2 as a potential ubiquitination target downstream of RNF157 activity.
The phenotype of RNF157 knockdown cells is consistent with a potential role for RNF157 during late S and G2/M transition. To gain a better understanding of the cellular role of RNF157, we undertook a proteomic approach to search for RNF157-interacting proteins in melanoma cells overexpressing FLAG-tagged GFP versus FLAG-tagged RNF157. As shown in supplemental Table S4, several proteins were pulled down specifically with immunoprecipitated RNF157-FLAG but not GFP-FLAG from two independent melanoma lines. Interestingly, many of these putative RNF157-interacting proteins are implicated in RNA processing and translation, including several mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (RM19, RT18B, and RT02). Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins are synthesized during G1/S, peak in abundance during S phase, subsequently get degraded during M phase (32), and therefore are expressed in the same cell cycle window as RNF157. Further validation of these putative interactive partners and the role of RNF157 in their regulation in future studies may shed light into the mechanistic role of RNF157 during cell cycle progression.
Discussion
The PI3K and MAPK pathways intersect at multiple levels (33, 34), and combined inhibition of these pathways in tumors shows a stronger effect on apoptosis induction and growth inhibition than individual pathway inhibition (3, 5). One of the key integration points between the PI3K and MAPK pathways is the cell cycle machinery, itself an attractive domain for identifying novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets. Both PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways have been reported to regulate the activation of CDK2, which plays a key role in cell cycle progression, including the regulation of the APC/C–CDH1 E3 ligase complex (26–30). Our study reveals that RNF157, a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase, acts at the interface between the PI3K and MAPK pathways and the cell cycle machinery to promote cell cycle progression and tumor cell survival.
Proper regulation of protein ubiquitination and degradation by the APC and SCF (skp1–cul1–F-box-protein) ubiquitin ligase complexes are key to maintaining the integrity of the cell cycle. Although the SCF ligases target substrates with F-box degrons during the G1/S, S, and G2 phases, APC ligases are mainly active during M phase and are required to drive progression and exit from mitosis by inducing the proteolysis of key cell cycle regulators through the recognition of D-box or KEN box motifs by the CDC20 and CDH1 APC adaptor proteins (35–40). Our work introduces the D-box-containing protein RNF157 as a candidate mitotic APC/C–CDH1 substrate. In support of RNF157 being a putative APC/C–CDH1 target, two of the four D-box motifs on RNF157 show strong correlations with the consensus D-box motif (RXXLXXXXN) recognized by the APC/C–CDH1 E3 ligase complex, and unlike wild-type RNF157, RNF157 mutants lacking one or both of these D-box motifs are stable in the presence of overexpressed CDH1 (Fig. 3D). In addition, siRNA-mediated silencing of endogenous CDH1 leads to a decrease in RNF157 ubiquitination (Fig. 3B) and to an increase in endogenous RNF157 protein levels (Fig. 3C). To definitively establish RNF157 as a direct APC/C–CDH1 target, additional in vitro experiments using recombinant RNF157 and reconstituted APC/C–CDH1 complex are needed; however, such experiments are complicated by the fact that sufficient quantities of purified APC/C–CDH1 are difficult to obtain (41).
Protein phosphorylation is a key control mechanism regulating signaling pathways downstream of PI3K and MAPK activation. In addition to phosphorylation, there is precedence for extensive cross-talk between phosphorylation and ubiquitination as part of the regulation of cell cycle progression (42). In this study, we have identified the RNF157 phosphosites Ser660–663as playing a key role in the cell cycle-dependent regulation of RNF157 stability. This does not exclude the possibility that additional phosphorylation sites of RNF157 (43–45) may also contribute to its regulation. However, it appears that the Ser660–663 region is key for regulating RNF157 interactions with the CDH1 component of the APC/C complex and thus RNF157 stability. RNF157 phosphorylation at Ser660–663 oscillates during the cell cycle in concert with CDK2 activation and downstream target CDC6 (Figs. 2C and 4). Furthermore, CDK2 inhibition blocks growth factor-stimulated increase in pRNF157S660–663 to the same degree as PI3K/MEK inhibition (Fig. 4C), supporting the model that CDK2 and the kinases it regulates act downstream of PI3K/MEK in a linear pathway to regulate RNF157 stability in concert with its other substrates and with the APC/C–CDH1 complex itself. Preliminary data showing endogenous CDK2 levels increasing in RNF157 knockdown cells (Fig. 5G) may point to a reciprocal role for RNF157 in modulating CDK2 levels, an area that warrants further investigation.
Given the scarcity of robust detection reagents for studying endogenous RNF157 levels as they are dynamically regulated and interact with the cell cycle machinery, we have had to rely on exogenous RNF157 for most of our mechanistic studies. Additional studies are needed to address the role of endogenous RNF157 and its regulation and role in the cell cycle. Despite these limitations, we have demonstrated that knockdown of endogenous RNF157 leads to cell cycle arrest during the late S phase and G2/M checkpoint in tumor cells (Fig. 5, D–F), supporting a role of RNF157 in promoting cell cycle progression. In addition, we have shown that endogenous RNF157 knockdown increases apoptosis in combination with PI3K/MAPK pathway inhibition in melanoma cells (Fig. 1E). In an effort to further characterize the role of RNF157, we have identified putative RNF157-interacting proteins by mass spectrometry-based proteomics, including several proteins involved in RNA processing and ribosome biogenesis (supplemental Table S4).
In conclusion, our data support a model in which phosphorylation of RNF157 at Ser660–663 downstream of PI3K/MEK/CDK2 activity promotes RNF157 interaction with CDH1. This interaction, however, does not lead to RNF157 degradation until the APC/C–CDH1 complex, normally under negative CDK2 control, becomes active during late mitosis and G1 (supplemental Fig. S5). We propose that such coordinated and controlled degradation of RNF157 promotes proper exit from mitosis and cell cycle progression. The fact that knockdown of RNF157 in asynchronous cells has negative consequences for the cell cycle suggests that RNF157 plays an important role during the early phases of the cell cycle. Although the precise function of RNF157 remains unclear, our data suggest that inhibition of RNF157 in combination with PI3K/MAPK inhibition may provide therapeutic benefit to patients whose tumors show coordinate activation of the PI3K and MAPK pathways.
Materials and methods
Antibodies
Total RNF157 and RNF157 Ser(P)660–663 antibodies were generated by YenZyme Antibodies, LLC. For the phosphospecific RNF157 antibody generation, rabbits were immunized with the phosphopeptide (CRNAQRRRLpSpSpSpSLED-amide where pS is phosphorylated serine) corresponding to residues 652–666 of RNF157. The phosphospecific antibody was then purified in two steps: 1) positive selection using the same phosphopeptide followed by 2) negative selection against the non-phosphopeptide to remove any cross-reactive antibody components. Antibodies against CDK2 (78B2), CDK2 Thr(P)160, CDC6 (C42F7), cyclin B1, Myc tag (9B11), AKT, AKT Ser(P)473, ubiquitin (P4D1), and HA tag (C29F4) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-actin was purchased from Invitrogen, and anti-CDH1 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
cDNAs
All cDNAs with/without any tag and modification (point mutations and deletions) used in this study were obtained from GeneCopoeia: FLAG-RNF157 full length, FLAG-RNF157Δ4SA (deletion of residues Ser660–663), FLAG-RNF157ΔRING (deletion of RING domain), FLAG-RNF157–5SA (point mutations S106A, S336A, T378A, S414A, and S572A), FLAG-RNF157-Dbox-I (point mutations R329A and L332A), FLAG-RNF157-Dbox-II (point mutations R656A and L659A), FLAG-RNF157-DDbox (double D-box mutant; R329A, L332A, R656A, and L659A), GFP-RNF157, FLAG, NIPA, FLAG-NIPA-4SA (phosphodeficient mutant), FLAG-EGFP, Myc-CDK2, Myc-CDH1, HA-ubiquitin, FLAG-EV (empty control vector), Myc-EV(empty control vector), HA-EV (empty control vector), and pReceiver-M11-FLAG-GFP.
siRNAs
All siRNAs used in this study were purchased from Dharmacon: siRNF157-1, D-022965-01; siRNF157-2, D-022965-02; siRNF157-3, D-022965-18; siRNF157-4, D-022965–04; control siRNAs, D-001206-13.
Other reagents
GDC-0941 (pictilisib; PI3K inhibitor) and GDC-0973 (cobimetinib; MEK inhibitor) were obtained from the Department of Chemistry at Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 drug concentrations for melanoma cell lines were selected based on conditions described previously (3), and dosing solutions were prepared in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich). Nocodazole (M1404) and thymidine (T1895) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Cell Extraction Buffer (FNN0011, Thermo Fisher Scientific), MG132 InSolution (474791, Calbiochem), CDK2 inhibitor III (Calbiochem), roscovitine (Cell Signaling Technology), and calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs) were obtained from the sources indicated. The Click-iT® EdU Assay kit was from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Human cell lines
Cell lines A2058, 624MEL, HeLa, and U02S were acquired from ATCC and maintained at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2 in DMEM with 10% (v/v) FBS and 2 mm l-glutamine.
Label-free phosphoproteomic screen
Proteins were extracted from each cell line and digested with trypsin. For phosphopeptide enrichment in serial immunoaffinity purifications, phosphomotif antibodies were used in the following order: PXpSP, pTP, RXRXXpS, and RXXpS where “X” represents any amino acid and “p” reflects the phosphorylation site. The samples were run in duplicate and analyzed using LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (see “Label-free phosphoproteomics”). We used a 3-fold cutoff to define regulation as 80–90% of phosphopeptide intensity changes fell within a ±3-fold change interval for most comparisons.
Microscopy-based measurement of cell death
To quantify cell survival of A2058 and 624MEL cells after PI3K and MEK inhibition (0.625 μm), we added CellEvent® caspase-3/7 green detection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions and imaged fluorescence signals at 488 nm with an IncuCyte ZOOM system (Essens Bioscience) every 90 min over 38 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Images were captured at ×20, and fluorescence signal was quantified using CellProfiler software (46).
Stable cell line generation
cDNAs were cloned into the pShuttle-CMV/TO vector and then transferred to the Retro-GW-pHUSH-Neo retroviral destination vector by a Gateway recombination reaction (Invitrogen) as described previously (47). Retroviral vectors were co-transfected with a pVSV-G plasmid into GP2-293 packaging cells (Clontech) using FuGENE transfection reagent (Promega). Viral supernatants were collected 72 h post-transfection, centrifuged, and added to 624MEL and A2058 cells in the presence of Polybrene. Stable pools were generated by selection with Geneticin (Invitrogen).
Affinity purification of FLAG fusion proteins
Cell lines stably expressing doxycycline-inducible FLAG fusion proteins were plated in 500-cm2 plates. Twenty-four hours following induction with doxycycline (1 μg/ml), cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and lysed in extraction buffer supplemented with a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science), phosphatase inhibitor mixtures (Sigma), and 1 mm PMSF. After addition of extraction buffer, samples were incubated on ice for 30 min and cleared by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. Protein levels were quantified by the BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology) and normalized to equal concentrations. Equal amounts of protein from each sample were precleared with mouse IgG-agarose beads (Sigma) for 2 h at 4 °C and then incubated with anti-FLAG M2 affinity agarose gel (Sigma) overnight at 4 °C. Samples were washed three times in ice-cold extraction buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors, resuspended in TBS-FLAG buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl) containing 5 mg/ml 3× FLAG peptide (Sigma), and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C to elute bound protein. Eluates were concentrated by TCA precipitation and resuspended in 1× lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1× reducing agent (Invitrogen).
Mass spectrometry
3 × 108 624MEL and A2058 cells transfected with 500 mg of FLAG-RNF157 for 48 h were lysed in 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 9 mm MgCl2, 92 mm NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100. FLAG-tagged RNF157 was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG M2 beads (Sigma) and washed in high-salt buffer (20 mm HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 420 mm NaCl, 0.2 mm EDTA, 25% glycerol) for 10 min and then in low-salt buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 300 mm NaCl, 0.2 mm EDTA, 20% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) for 10 min (three repetitions) and overnight. Complexes were eluted with 500 mg/ml 3× FLAG peptide (Sigma), separated by SDS-PAGE, and then digested with trypsin. Peptides were separated by reverse-phase chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometric analysis in an LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific). MS/MS data were analyzed using the search algorithm Mascot (Matrix Science) and filtered to 1% peptide false discovery rate using a linear discriminant analysis as described previously (48).
Transfection of cell lines
Transient plasmid transfections were carried out using HiPerFect transfection reagent (Qiagen), and all siRNA transfections were carried out using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturers' instructions. Cells were harvested between 24 and 48 h after plasmid transfection and between 2 and 4 days for siRNA transfection.
Cellular assays
GDC-0941 and GDC-0973 were obtained from the chemistry department at Genentech, Inc. as a 10 mm DMSO stock solution. Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mm l-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were plated in normal growth medium at 6000 cells/well in 96-well clear-bottom black plates. The following day, cells were transfected with 100 nm siRNA using DharmaFECT 3 (Dharmacon, Chicago, IL). 48 h post-transfection, cells were treated with GDC-0973 and GDC-0941. For cell proliferation assays, 10 nm GDC-0973 and 100 nm GDC-0941 were used. For cell death assays, 20 nm GDC-0973 and 200 nm GDC-0941 were used. 24 h following drug treatment, cell proliferation was measured using the Cell Proliferation ELISA BrdU assay (Roche Applied Science), and cell death was quantified using the Cell Death Detection ELISA PLUS assay (Roche Applied Science) according to manufacturer's instructions.
Cell treatments and cell synchronization
Cells were synchronized at G1/S phase by culture in 2 mm thymidine for 24 h, fresh medium for 8 h, and then 2 mm thymidine for a further 16 h. Cells were synchronized at prometaphase by culture in 2 mm thymidine for 24 h, fresh medium for 5 h, and then 100 nm nocodazole for 16 h.
Immunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed in Cell Extraction Buffer, 1 mm PMSF (P7626, Sigma-Aldrich) protease inhibitor (11836153001, Roche Applied Science), and Phosphatase Inhibitor Mixture 2/3 (Sigma-Aldrich). Two milligrams of the lysate was incubated with 2 μg of monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody (F3165, Sigma-Aldrich) or anti-Myc tag (9B11) mouse mAb (2276, Cell Signaling Technology) for 2 h at 4 °C, and immunocomplexes were precipitated using protein-G and A-Sepharose beads (17-6002-35, GE Healthcare). Beads were then washed three times with extraction buffer.
Western blotting
To prepare protein extracts, cells were washed once with cold PBS and lysed at 4 °C in 1× Cell Extraction Buffer according to the manufacturer's instructions. For Western blot analysis, proteins were resolved by 4–12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Life Technologies). Immunoblotting was performed using the indicated primary antibodies, and immunoblots were analyzed using secondary antibodies for enhanced chemiluminescence.
Cell cycle analyses
To analyze the cell cycle distribution, cells transfected with siRNAs were stained by using the Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor® 647 Flow Cytometry Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Analyses were then performed with a FACScan cytometer (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software.
Label-free phosphoproteomics
For global views of phosphorylation, cell lines were probed with four phosphomotif antibodies (KinomeView®, Cell Signaling Technology) as shown in supplemental Fig. S1. For the MS-based phosphoproteomic screen, cells were washed once with cold PBS and lysed in urea lysis buffer (20 mm HEPES, pH 8.0, 9.0 m urea, 1 mm sodium orthovanadate, 2.5 mm sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mm β-glycerol phosphate). For each sample, 10 150-mm dishes of cells grown to 70–80% confluence were lysed in 10 ml of urea lysis buffer. Sonication of resulting lysates was performed at 15-watt output power twice for 20 s and once for 15 s. Sonicated lysates were centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min to remove insoluble material, and protein extracts were reduced and carboxamidomethylated. Following normalization of total protein, proteins were digested overnight by trypsin (MAPK and tPP enrichments) or Glu-C (AKT enrichments) and subsequently trypsin-digested post-immunoaffinity purification. Resulting peptides were separated from non-peptide material by solid-phase extraction with Sep-Pak C18 cartridges. Lyophilized peptides were redissolved, and phosphopeptides were enriched by serial immunoaffinity purifications using slurries of the appropriate immobilized motif antibody and eluted from antibody–resin into a total volume of 100 μl in 0.15% TFA, and concentrated with C18 spin tips. Finally, peptides were loaded onto a 10-cm × 75-μm PicoFrit capillary column (developed with a 90-min linear gradient of acetonitrile in 0.125% formic acid delivered at 280 nl/min) packed with Magic C18 AQ reversed-phase resin. Using XCalibur 2.0.7 SP1, a “top 20” method, a dynamic exclusion repeat count of 1 and a repeat duration of 30 s were applied. Tandem mass spectra were collected with the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Real-time recalibration of mass error was applied using lock mass with a singly charged polysiloxane ion (mass-to-charge (m/z) = 371.101237). MS spectra were collected in the Orbitrap component, and MS/MS spectra were collected in the LTQ. A mass accuracy of ±50 ppm was used for precursor ions, and 1 Da was used for product ions. SEQUEST 3G and the SORCERER 2 platform from Sage-N Research (v4.0; Milpitas, CA) were used to analyze MS/MS spectra. Searches were performed against the NCBI Homo sapiens FASTA database updated on September 6, 2010 (release 43). A reverse decoy database was used to estimate false positive rates. Using the Peptide Prophet module of SORCERER 2, peptide assignments were obtained at a 5% false positive discovery rate. Up to four missed cleavages and peptides with one non-tryptic terminus (not cleaved after Lys or Arg) were allowed. Methionine oxidation and Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylation were allowed. Cysteine carboxamidomethylation was specified as a static modification. Results were further filtered for the matches with the phosphorylation motif of the respective antibodies and using mass accuracy (±5ppm) filters. The final false positive discovery rate on motif-containing peptides was lower than 1%. Changes in phosphopeptide intensities were determined by taking the ratio of averaged raw intensities between two specified conditions. We used chromatographic retention times and m/z ratios for all phosphopeptides identified in one or more samples to search for phosphopeptide ions in the ion chromatogram files. Retention time windows were variable and based on the systematic retention time deviation pattern from the extracted ion chromatograms. The m/z ranges were also variable and dependent on the mass error narrowing performed in a previous step.
Generation of phosphospecific RNF157 antibody
The rabbits were immunized with the phosphopeptide (CRNAQRRRLpSpSpSpSLED-amide). The antibody was then purified against this phosphopeptide, which yielded two antibody populations, phosphospecific and cross-reactive antibodies. To separate these populations of antibody, the purified antibody went through the affinity absorption step against the non-phosphopeptide. This absorption step was done twice to increase the antibody specificity to the phosphopeptide.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the unpaired t test with a two-tailed p value using a GraphPad software package (Prism 6.0). Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. p values are designated with asterisks as follows: * means p ≤ 0.05, ** means p ≤ 0.01, and *** means p ≤ 0.001.
Author contributions
T. D., K. P. H., and G. H. conceived the project. T. D. designed and performed most biochemical and cellular experiments. M. P. S. designed the phosphoproteomic experiment. F. G. and M. P. S. analyzed the phosphoproteomic data. T. D., J. C., L. P., A. Y., and D. S. K. performed the mass spectrometry experiments. J. C. screened the top hits from the phosphoproteomic analysis by using siRNAs and performed the cell death analysis. SD. produced cell survival data by using a caspase-3/7 detection system. M. J. C. analyzed the conservation profile of RNF157. L. S. F. and M. B. participated in the design of the study and helped to revise the manuscript. T. D., F. G., and G. H. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Gerard Manning for critical reading of the manuscript and Allison Bruce for the artwork in supplemental Fig. S5.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
This article contains supplemental Figs. S1–S5 and Tables S1–S4.
- RNF157
- really interesting new gene (RING) finger protein 157
- CDK
- cyclin-dependent kinase
- APC/C
- anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome
- D-box
- destruction box
- pRNF157
- phosphorylated RNF157
- APC
- anaphase-promoting complex
- NIPA
- nuclear-interacting partner of ALK
- EV
- empty vector
- EdU
- 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine
- LTQ
- linear trap quadrupole
- pCDK2
- phosphorylated CDK2.
References
- 1. Mendoza M. C., Er E. E., and Blenis J. (2011) The Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR pathways: cross-talk and compensation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 320–328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. De Luca A., Maiello M. R., D'Alessio A., Pergameno M., and Normanno N. (2012) The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and the PI3K/AKT signalling pathways: role in cancer pathogenesis and implications for therapeutic approaches. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 16, Suppl. 2, S17–S27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hoeflich K. P., Merchant M., Orr C., Chan J., Den Otter D., Berry L., Kasman I., Koeppen H., Rice K., Yang N. Y., Engst S., Johnston S., Friedman L. S., and Belvin M. (2012) Intermittent administration of MEK inhibitor GDC-0973 plus PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 triggers robust apoptosis and tumor growth inhibition. Cancer Res. 72, 210–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Britten C. D. (2013) PI3K and MEK inhibitor combinations: examining the evidence in selected tumor types. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 71, 1395–1409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Shelton J. G., Steelman L. S., Lee J. T., Knapp S. L., Blalock W. L., Moye P. W., Franklin R. A., Pohnert S. C., Mirza A. M., McMahon M., and McCubrey J. A. (2003) Effects of the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signal transduction pathways on the abrogation of cytokine-dependence and prevention of apoptosis in hematopoietic cells. Oncogene 22, 2478–2492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hsu P. P., Kang S. A., Rameseder J., Zhang Y., Ottina K. A., Lim D., Peterson T. R., Choi Y., Gray N. S., Yaffe M. B., Marto J. A., and Sabatini D. M. (2011) The mTOR-regulated phosphoproteome reveals a mechanism of mTORC1-mediated inhibition of growth factor signaling. Science 332, 1317–1322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kirkpatrick D. S., Bustos D. J., Dogan T., Chan J., Phu L., Young A., Friedman L. S., Belvin M., Song Q., Bakalarski C. E., and Hoeflich K. P. (2013) Phosphoproteomic characterization of DNA damage response in melanoma cells following MEK/PI3K dual inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 19426–19431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wu X., Renuse S., Sahasrabuddhe N. A., Zahari M. S., Chaerkady R., Kim M. S., Nirujogi R. S., Mohseni M., Kumar P., Raju R., Zhong J., Yang J., Neiswinger J., Jeong J. S., Newman R., et al. (2014) Activation of diverse signalling pathways by oncogenic PIK3CA mutations. Nat. Commun. 5, 4961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Stokes M. P., Farnsworth C. L., Moritz A., Silva J. C., Jia X., Lee K. A., Guo A., Polakiewicz R. D., and Comb M. J. (2012) PTMScan direct: identification and quantification of peptides from critical signaling proteins by immunoaffinity enrichment coupled with LC-MS/MS. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 187–201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gnad F., Young A., Zhou W., Lyle K., Ong C. C., Stokes M. P., Silva J. C., Belvin M., Friedman L. S., Koeppen H., Minden A., and Hoeflich K. P. (2013) Systems-wide analysis of K-Ras, Cdc42, and PAK4 signaling by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 2070–2080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Subramanian A., Tamayo P., Mootha V. K., Mukherjee S., Ebert B. L., Gillette M. A., Paulovich A., Pomeroy S. L., Golub T. R., Lander E. S., and Mesirov J. P. (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 15545–15550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Overton J. D., and Leibel R. L. (2011) Mahoganoid and mahogany mutations rectify the obesity of the yellow mouse by effects on endosomal traffic of MC4R protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 18914–18929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kim B. Y., Olzmann J. A., Barsh G. S., Chin L. S., and Li L. (2007) Spongiform neurodegeneration-associated E3 ligase Mahogunin ubiquitylates TSG101 and regulates endosomal trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 1129–1142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aguzzi A., and Steele A. D. (2009) Prion topology and toxicity. Cell 137, 994–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cooray S. N., Guasti L., and Clark A. J. (2011) The E3 ubiquitin ligase Mahogunin ubiquitinates the melanocortin 2 receptor. Endocrinology 152, 4224–4231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lee E. W., Lee M. S., Camus S., Ghim J., Yang M. R., Oh W., Ha N. C., Lane D. P., and Song J. (2009) Differential regulation of p53 and p21 by MKRN1 E3 ligase controls cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. EMBO J. 28, 2100–2113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Drozdetskiy A., Cole C., Procter J., and Barton G. J. (2015) JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W389–W394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yang Z. R., Thomson R., McNeil P., and Esnouf R. M. (2005) RONN: the bio-basis function neural network technique applied to the detection of natively disordered regions in proteins. Bioinformatics 21, 3369–3376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Matz A., Lee S. J., Schwedhelm-Domeyer N., Zanini D., Holubowska A., Kannan M., Farnworth M., Jahn O., Göpfert M. C., and Stegmüller J. (2015) Regulation of neuronal survival and morphology by the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF157. Cell Death Differ 22, 626–642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mailand N., and Diffley J. F. (2005) CDKs promote DNA replication origin licensing in human cells by protecting Cdc6 from APC/C-dependent proteolysis. Cell 122, 915–926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Petersen B. O., Wagener C., Marinoni F., Kramer E. R., Melixetian M., Lazzerini Denchi E., Gieffers C., Matteucci C., Peters J. M., and Helin K. (2000) Cell cycle- and cell growth-regulated proteolysis of mammalian CDC6 is dependent on APC-CDH1. Genes Dev. 14, 2330–2343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bassermann F., Eichner R., and Pagano M. (2014) The ubiquitin proteasome system—implications for cell cycle control and the targeted treatment of cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 150–162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Dephoure N., Zhou C., Villén J., Beausoleil S. A., Bakalarski C. E., Elledge S. J., and Gygi S. P. (2008) A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 10762–10767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nigg E. A. (2001) Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 21–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cohen P. (2000) The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation—a 25 year update. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 596–601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhou J. X., Fan L. X., Li X., Calvet J. P., and Li X. (2015) TNFα signaling regulates cystic epithelial cell proliferation through Akt/mTOR and ERK/MAPK/Cdk2 mediated Id2 signaling. PLoS One 10, e0131043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wierød L., Rosseland C. M., Lindeman B., Oksvold M. P., Grøsvik H., Skarpen E., and Huitfeldt H. S. (2007) CDK2 regulation through PI3K and CDK4 is necessary for cell cycle progression of primary rat hepatocytes. Cell Prolif. 40, 475–487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhang W., and Liu H. T. (2002) MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res 12, 9–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lents N. H., Keenan S. M., Bellone C., and Baldassare J. J. (2002) Stimulation of the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade is necessary and sufficient for activation and Thr-160 phosphorylation of a nuclear-targeted CDK2. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 47469–47475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lukas C., Sørensen C. S., Kramer E., Santoni-Rugiu E., Lindeneg C., Peters J. M., Bartek J., and Lukas J. (1999) Accumulation of cyclin B1 requires E2F and cyclin-A-dependent rearrangement of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 401, 815–818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Takeda D. Y., Wohlschlegel J. A., and Dutta A. (2001) A bipartite substrate recognition motif for cyclin-dependent kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1993–1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Aviner R., Shenoy A., Elroy-Stein O., and Geiger T. (2015) Uncovering hidden layers of cell cycle regulation through integrative multi-omic analysis. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Halilovic E., She Q. B., Ye Q., Pagliarini R., Sellers W. R., Solit D. B., and Rosen N. (2010) PIK3CA mutation uncouples tumor growth and cyclin D1 regulation from MEK/ERK and mutant KRAS signaling. Cancer Res. 70, 6804–6814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zimmermann S., and Moelling K. (1999) Phosphorylation and regulation of Raf by Akt (protein kinase B). Science 286, 1741–1744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Reed S. I. (2003) Ratchets and clocks: the cell cycle, ubiquitylation and protein turnover. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 855–864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Jackson P. K., and Eldridge A. G. (2002) The SCF ubiquitin ligase: an extended look. Mol. Cell 9, 923–925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Pfleger C. M., Lee E., and Kirschner M. W. (2001) Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 15, 2396–2407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Weissman A. M. (2001) Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 169–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pfleger C. M., and Kirschner M. W. (2000) The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 14, 655–665 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zachariae W., and Nasmyth K. (1999) Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 13, 2039–2058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jarvis M. A., Brown N. G., Watson E. R., VanderLinden R., Schulman B. A., and Peters J. M. (2016) Measuring APC/C-dependent ubiquitylation in vitro. Methods Mol. Biol. 1342, 287–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Nguyen L. K., Kolch W., and Kholodenko B. N. (2013) When ubiquitination meets phosphorylation: a systems biology perspective of EGFR/MAPK signalling. Cell Commun. Signal. 11, 52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Trinidad J. C., Barkan D. T., Gulledge B. F., Thalhammer A., Sali A., Schoepfer R., and Burlingame A. L. (2012) Global identification and characterization of both O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation at the murine synapse. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 215–229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Huttlin E. L., Jedrychowski M. P., Elias J. E., Goswami T., Rad R., Beausoleil S. A., Villén J., Haas W., Sowa M. E., and Gygi S. P. (2010) A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174–1189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Moritz A., Li Y., Guo A., Villén J., Wang Y., MacNeill J., Kornhauser J., Sprott K., Zhou J., Possemato A., Ren J. M., Hornbeck P., Cantley L. C., Gygi S. P., Rush J., et al. (2010) Akt-RSK-S6 kinase signaling networks activated by oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases. Sci. Signal. 3, ra64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kamentsky L., Jones T. R., Fraser A., Bray M. A., Logan D. J., Madden K. L., Ljosa V., Rueden C., Eliceiri K. W., and Carpenter A. E. (2011) Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 27, 1179–1180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Gray D. C., Hoeflich K. P., Peng L., Gu Z., Gogineni A., Murray L. J., Eby M., Kljavin N., Seshagiri S., Cole M. J., and Davis D. P. (2007) pHUSH: a single vector system for conditional gene expression. BMC Biotechnol. 7, 61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tran H., Bustos D., Yeh R., Rubinfeld B., Lam C., Shriver S., Zilberleyb I., Lee M. W., Phu L., Sarkar A. A., Zohn I. E., Wertz I. E., Kirkpatrick D. S., and Polakis P. (2013) HectD1 E3 ligase modifies adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) with polyubiquitin to promote the APC-axin interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 3753–3767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.