Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 4;7:10344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10531-7

Physico-chemical characterization of Antheraea mylitta silk mats for wound healing applications

G H Darshan 1,#, Dexu Kong 2,#, Julien Gautrot 2,#, Shyamkumar Vootla 1,✉,#
PMCID: PMC5583262  PMID: 28871135

Abstract

In the field of plastic reconstructive surgery, development of new innovative matrices for skin repair is in demand. The ideal biomaterial should promote attachment, proliferation and growth of cells. Additionally, it should degrade in an appropriate time period without releasing harmful substances, not exerting a pathological immune response. The materials used should display optimized mechanical properties to sustain cell growth and limit scaffold contraction. Wound healing is a biological process directed towards restoration of tissue that has suffered an injury. An important phase of wound healing is the generation of a basal epithelium wholly replacing the epidermis of the wound. Wild silk from Antheraea mylitta meets these demands to a large extent. To evaluate the effects of the treatment, Antheraea mylitta and Bombyx mori samples were characterized by SEM-EDX, FT-IR, XRD and TGA-DSC techniques. Preliminary cell growth behavior was carried out by culturing epidermal cells and proliferation was quantified via viability assay. Moreover, Antheraea mylitta possesses excellent cell-adhesive capability, effectively promoting cell attachment and proliferation. Antheraea mylitta serves as a delivery vehicle for cells. With all these unique features, it is expected that Antheraea mylitta mat will have wide utility in the areas of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Introduction

One goal in the field of biomaterials is to fabricate matrices that mimic the structure and biological function of the extracellular matrix (ECM)1. ECM is made out of two principle types of macromolecules, glycosaminoglycans and proteins such as collagen and fibronectin, which together shape a dense mesh of fibres scaffolding tissues. For example, collagen fibres organize into a three-dimensional matrix structured at multiple length scales to confer robust mechanical properties to the ECM as well as promote cell adhesion2, 3. Similarly, the scaffolds designed for tissue regeneration and wound healing need to accomplish similar functions (mechanical structure and promoting cell adhesion) in order to guide cell phenotypes such as proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, biocompatibility and biodegradability, with non-toxic and non-inflammatory degradation products during replacement in vivo by cellular ECM components are key criteria4.

Natural and synthetic polymers and a hybrid of both have been used widely for the design of biocompatible materials for applications as skin grafts. Commercialized skin grafts are mainly constructed from collagen and biodegradable polymers, such as poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL)5, poly (lactic acid) (PLA)6, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)7, and poly (glycolic acid) (PGA)8, can be manufactured reproductively on a large scale, and can also be processed into biocompatible material in a more controllable manner. The materials macro/micro structure, mechanical properties, and degradation rate can be relatively easily tuned and manipulated to address the requirements of a range of different applications9, 10.

A major drawback of synthetic polymer scaffolds is that they are not biologically active, in contrast, to naturally occurring ECM (extracellular matrix): they do not have specific motifs on their surface for specific cell targeting and binding, nor do they provide soluble factors for correct cell growth and development. RGD-containing peptide sequences and many other cell adhesive peptides, saccharides, and proteins have been successfully conjugated to the surface of biomaterials using adsorption or covalent grafting methods, in order to confer bioactivity to the polymer and promote cell adhesion. Enhanced cell adhesion and improved cell proliferation have been observed through these treatments1113.

Several research groups have focused on electrospinning for the design of fibrous matrices, with substantial progress. One of the disadvantages of the degumming procedure is that it results in detrimental changes in the mechanical properties of silk fibroin14. Furthermore, the extent to which these properties are affected may depend upon the method used15. Because of the complex and not yet fully characterized construction electrospinning silk, the design of artificial fibres with similar properties to native dragline silk proves to be still a complex challenge16, 17. An ideal biomaterial should be non-toxic, non-immunogenic and sustain cell adhesion, migration, proliferation and remodelling of the wound bed, in order to promote tissue regeneration18, 19.

Silkworm silk has long been used in the textile industry as well as for sutures in medical applications. In the last few decades, silk has also been exploited as a potential biomaterial in tissue engineering applications for its various desirable properties such as cell attachment, cytocompatibilty, biodegradability, enhanced mechanical and tensile strength, as well as versatile processing options, in order to meet tissue-specific requirements. Silk is composed of two main protein components: A water-soluble protein glue, sericin, that bonds the crystalline fibroin together to form the natural silk fiber. Sericin usually constitutes 20–30% of silk protein in cocoon20, 21. Sericin is a group of polypeptides comprised of 17–18 types of amino acids22, 23, most of which have strong polar side groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups with high serine, aspartic acid, and glycine are the three most abundant amino acids24. Sericin from non-mulberry cocoons has been investigated for their ability to support the growth of skin cells25. Fibroblast cells were grown on cross-linked sericin films which showed enhanced fibroblast attachment and viability. The membranes also exhibited slow degradation and excellent mechanical properties26, 27. Thus sericin protein membranes can open up new dimensions for skin tissue repair. Silk sericin protein from A. mylitta has also been found effective in inhibiting UVB-induced apoptosis in human skin keratinocytes28. Sericin becomes immunogenic only when it is associated with fibroin29.

Mechanical properties are important structural variants of silk fibre. As, the quality parameters of the mulberry and non-mulberry can be measured with the variation of the tensile properties including strain, tenacity, Young’s modulus, toughness etc. A. mylitta have favourable properties for tissue engineering/biomaterial offering advantages such as relative ease in fabrication into diverse morphologies, ease of processability, exceptional flexibility and porosity. The fact that A. mylitta silk is a biocompatible natural protein provides silk materials with added advantages, such as minimal immune response, good adherence and growth of cells on/in silk matrices. The main advantage of the present approach is that it provides a unique opportunity to broaden the application of Indian tasar silkworm A. mylitta for tissue regeneration.

The chemical structure of A. mylitta (Am) silk fibroin is remarkably different from that of B. mori (Bm) silk fibroin. In comparison with the amino acid composition of B. mori silk fibroin, the alanine residues content of A. mylitta silk fibroin is higher than that of B. mori silk fibroin. Additionally, it contains abundant aspartic and arginine which can form the famous sequence: Arg-Gly- Asp (RGD) sequences which favours cell attachment. There are many repeated -(Gly-Ala-Gly-X)n sequences in the crystalline region of B. mori silk fibroin where X refers to Ser or Tyr30, 31.

Much of the work has been accomplished using mulberry silk, produced by B. mori, a domesticated silkworm and has been studied for use in surgery and tissue engineering, but the use of non-mulberry silk, A. mylitta has not received much attention, despite its higher mineralization content. An important hurdle in this respect is the development of methodologies allowing the deposition of silk mats of A. mylitta, more suitable for tissue engineering applications than cocoons. This study presents a simple methodology enabling the deposition of silk mats of A. mylitta and the study of the physico-chemical as well as surface properties of the A. mylitta and B. mori silks, with the aim to determine the suitability of wild silk mats as a biocompatible potential substratum for supporting cell adhesion and proliferation.

Results and Discussion

We examined A. mylitta and B. mori silk mat in in vitro culture systems to determine whether this material supported the growth of human immortalized keratinocyte (HaCaTs) cells. The silk mats were prepared for culture with cells by cutting mats into 1 cm × 1 cm pieces32.

Surface morphology of Silk mats

The silk mats outer surface Fig. 1b–d illustrates the wide range of structures evolved by the Lepidopteran larva. Figure 1a depicts surface morphology of pure calcium oxalate monohydrate. At the most general level, both of the mats have a connected and porous fibre structure. Bm mats have a highly porous non-woven structure, while Am mats have very low porosity with the fibres densely packed and bonded by an almost continuous film of sericin. Mats of Am had a strong silk thread (peduncle) spun to attach the cocoon to the twig of a plant which is necessary during cocoon spinning33. The peduncle was composed of highly cross-linked fibers embedded with a mass of sericin gum. Calcium oxalate crystals were found on Am (Fig. 1b) surfaces34, and this feature may have a functionality role such as preferential gating of CO2 from cocoon inside to outside and temperature regulation to maintain a physiological temperature inside the cocoon irrespective of the surrounding environment35. The attachment surfaces of Bm (Fig. 1d) were smooth and plastered with large amounts of gum and crystals while Am cocoon was covered with white rectangular and cubic shaped granular crystalline materials throughout the surface except for areas of fiber intrusion. FTIR spectra showed the peaks at 1632 cm−1, 1317 cm−1 and 778 cm−1 were attributed to calcium oxalate crystal monohydrate. However, Am mats display a prominently higher level of mineralisation than Bm.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scanning electron microscopy of the materials (a) calcium oxalate monohydrate (b) Am, (c) Degummed Am and (d) Bm.

SEM images clearly show that the Am cocoon mats are intact on their surface with denser, more packed fibers compared to Bm (Fig. 1b,d). The compactness of Am cocoons can be attributed to the evolution of the corresponding species: Am silkworms undergo pupal diapause which denotes robust construction and compactness of pupa inside the cocoon for 4 months, which is not the case of Bm pupa and associated cocoons. However, the micrographs of samples degummed by alkali method show that extensively degummed fibers have a relatively smooth and clean surface as seen from Fig. 1c, but that all the sericin was not removed from the fibers. The fiber surface shows some evidence of very fine longitudinal striation attributable to the fibrillar structure of the truly degummed silk fibers36.

Composition of Silk mats

Figure 2 and Table 1 gathers elemental distributions measured for the different samples, using EDX. Apart from carbon (C), Nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O); Am, degummed Am and Bm mats reveal trace amounts of potassium (K) and chloride (Cl) could be detected (Fig. 2b–d). Calcium (Ca) is found in significant concentrations in Am mats (Fig. 2b), whereas it is found in trace amounts in degummed Am mat (Fig. 2c). Dermal excitation and inhibition are associated with the influx of calcium and chloride ions, respectively, into the skin. Activation of excitation receptors in cultured human keratinocytes similarly induces calcium ion influx and topical application of tissue recovery37. The highest concentration of calcium in Antheraea is understandable since several wild cocoon species have high concentrations of calcium oxalate crystals and trace amount of Zn and P can be detected in Am3842.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis showing the presence of elements in materials (a) Calcium oxalates (b) Am (c) Degummed Am and (d) Bm.

Table 1.

Summary of elemental analysis for different elements (wt%) present in different silk mats.

Samples C N O Na Cl Ca K
Calcium oxalate 14.79 56.52 28.70
Am 43.21 12.36 38.65 0.26 0.42 5.87 0.14
Degummed Am 51.71 20.37 27.30 0.20 0.35 0.08
Bm 51.64 19.60 28.44 0.36 0.57

In spite of the fact that these reviews exhibited the presence of calcium oxalate crystals on the surface however we are revealing that calcium oxalate is surprisingly unevenly dispersed on the surfaces A. mylitta silk mats compared to B. mori. Calcium oxalate crystals are thought to affect the thermal behaviour of silkworm cocoons, by keeping the still air trapped inside the cocoon structure and enhancing the thermal stability of the cocoon assembly35.

Structural characteristic of silk mats

FTIR spectroscopy is useful in the structural analysis of silk because the position and intensity of the amide bonds are sensitive to the molecular conformation and assembly of the corresponding protein chains. In Fig. 3a, the FTIR spectra showed absorption peaks at 1632 cm−1, 1317 cm−1 and 778 cm−1 for the calcium oxalate commercial powder. Whereas strong vibration at 1,632 cm−1 is assigned to asymmetric C=O vibration and the strong vibration at 1317 cm−1 is assigned as symmetric C=O vibration of the oxalate group35. Similarly, all three peaks are present in the Am mat (Fig. 3b). The absence of the peaks at 1632 cm−1, 1317 cm−1 and at 778 cm−1 indicates that the degummed Am and Bm mats do not contain calcium oxalate crystals. Thereby decreasing the cocoon porosity which lessen the mechanism of cocoon tensile properties. The characteristics of the IR spectra of amide I (1700–1600 cm−1), amide II (1540–1520 cm−1) and amide III (1300–1220 cm−1) of silk proteins43. Degummed Am (Fig. 3c) and Bm (Fig. 3d) are characterized by the absorption bands at 1659 cm−1 (amide I), assigned to random coil conformation, 1525 cm−1 (amide II) and 1236 cm−1 (amide III), attributed to the β-sheet structure. Similarly, the higher wavenumber broad absorption near 3446 cm−1 for Am and 3438 cm−1 for degummed Am mats indicates the presence of other functional groups in addition to O-H bonds arising from the presence of water. The weak vibration below 3000 cm−1 in all samples is attributed to CH bonds from the silk protein backbone and side chains.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

FTIR spectra of (a) Calcium oxalates, (b) Am (c) Degummed Am and (d) Bm.

Physical structure of silk mats

X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out to determine the structural changes of Am, degummed Am and Bm mats. The measured temperature ranged from room temperature to 70 °C, and diffraction profiles were collected at every rise of 1 °C and the X-ray diffraction patterns have been determined as follows: 11.8° and 22.0° for α-helix structure, and 16.5°, 20.2°, 24.9°, 30.9°, 34.59°, 40.97° and 44.12° for β-sheet structure44. Parts of the measured diffraction profiles are shown in Fig. 4. First we obtained the XRD pattern of pure calcium oxalate monohydrate and Fig. 4a shows the characteristic peaks around at 15°, 24.93°, 30.1°, 35.9°, 38.1°, 39.76° and 43.72°. There is no doubt about the identity of Am mats peaks at 14.9°, 24.93°, 30.1°, 35.9° and 38.1° (Fig. 4b) whose diffraction pattern is superimposable with the XRD pattern of pure calcium oxalate monohydrate. The X-ray diffraction intensity curves of Am reveals two peaks at 16.5° and 20.2° (Fig. 4b), and a single broad peak at 20.2° for Bm (Fig. 4d) are typical of silk fibers. Further, peaks around at 16.5° and 20.2° in XRD curve which indicate much β- sheet structure and high crystallinity when compared to Bm45. Silk degradation could be regulated by changing crystallinity and the degradability of silk can be related to the mode of processing and the corresponding content of beta sheet crystallinity. The difference in degradation was due to increased surface roughness or differences in content or distribution of crystallinity46. The diffraction patterns remained unchanged regardless of degummed Am (Fig. 4c), confirming that the crystalline structure was not directly affected by the chemical agent and further confirming the nature of the inorganic residues observed at the surface of silk fibers. The differences in diffraction peaks between Am and Bm were attributed to the differences in the unit cell dimensions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) The measured X-ray diffraction profile obtained from (a) Calcium oxalates, (b) Am, (c) Degummed Am and (d) Bm. (B) X-ray diffractogram of Calcium oxalates compared to Am mat.

DSC analysis

The thermal properties of different silk mats were first examined by standard DSC. Figure 5 depicts the standard DSC scans of Am, degummed Am and Bm mats. During the heating scans, Am mat and degummed Am first showed a peak corresponding to bound water evaporation, near 56 °C and 60 °C respectively. The bound water peaks of Bm mat started from about 40–60 °C47, 48. This indicates the silk sericin gums on the surfaces of Am mats may contain looser bound water molecules than that in degummed Am mat. In nature, this advantage could help them exchange water molecules easily with different atmospheres, while the fibers are rigid enough to protect the wild silkworm cocoons in an extremely wild environment49, 50. After the water removal, a small endothermic peak appeared at 128 °C for Am sample (Fig. 5a) attributed to a well-oriented β-sheet crystalline conformation, but which is not appearing in degummed mats or Bm mats. Meanwhile, the Bm maintained stable heat flow without any significant change in this region. Again, this highlights major differences between wild Am and domesticated Bm mats. The degradation peak temperatures of Bm mat was significantly lower than Am and degummed Am mats. With the help of heat-protective sericin layer, the Bm mat has a degradation peak around 308 °C (Fig. 5c). In comparison, the Am and degummed Am mats are much higher and are around 362 °C and 360 °C respectively (Fig. 5a and b), indicating that wild silks are more thermally stable than domesticated silks in nature.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Standard DSC scans of different mats. (a) Am (b) Degummed Am and (c) Bm.

Thermal Behaviour

To quantify the water content and study thermal degradation processes of samples, TGA was performed on the different silk mats. Generally, silk fibers degrade through three main stages: (i) starting from 70 °C, the moisture absorbed during storage will be released from the silk fibers; (ii) a second transition, from 265 °C to 380 °C, the silk fibers undergo an abrupt degradation; and (iii) from 380 °C onwards, the silk fibers start to decompose51, 52. Figure 6 reveals the mass percentage change of Am, degummed Am and Bm mats during heating from room temperature to 800 °C. During the initial heating from room temperature to about 100 °C, bound water molecules were removed from all silk samples as we demonstrated in the DSC study. However degummed Am mats still maintained water molecule as compared to Am and Bm mats. Am and degummed Am samples showed stable masses in the temperature region from 80 °C to about 310 °C and Bm from 70 °C to about 270 °C respectively53.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Thermogravimetric curves of (a) Am (b) Degummed Am and (c) Bm.

Above 314 °C, the major thermal degradation process started for Am and degummed Am samples degraded together between 312 °C–380 °C and their degradation rates slowed down above 664 °C and 626 °C respectively (Fig. 6a and b). After this, Bm samples showed the fastest weight loss 270 °C–356 °C in Fig. 6c as we predicted in the DSC study and degradation rates slowed down above 598 °C. Above this temperature, no peaks were observed in the first derivative and all traces decreased to plateau around 25 weight %. The Am and degummed silk samples, there is a significant difference of remaining mass 32. 5% & 35% at 664 °C and 622 °C respectively and thermal stability of the Am was enhanced by the sericin which acts as barriers for better heat insulation. For the Bm sample, the remaining mass (30%) at 598 °C, suggesting that the thermal stability of Bm cocoons in high-temperature regions are weaker than wild silk samples. Polymorphs of a crystalline structure and amino acid composition of Am are different from those of Bm silk fiber. Therefore, the thermal degradation behaviour is expected to be different between Am and Bm silk54.

Cell Culture

Tissue engineering allows the combination of cells with scaffolds or biomaterials in order to regenerate a tissue or organ in vivo or in vitro 55. This process not only requires the growth of relevant cells on the biomaterial but also the growth and spread of a vascular system to support the functioning and maintenance of the regenerated tissue56. The cytocompatibility of the materials is essential for their application in wound healing. Since it is the biomaterial surface that first comes into contact with the living tissue when the biomaterial is implanted, the initial response of the body to the biomaterial depends on its surface properties. Surface properties that can influence biocompatibility include surface charge, surface topography and hydrophilicity57. In our present study, cell attachment morphology and viability were studied on different silk mats. The cells appeared more spread on tissue culture plate (TCP) and A. mylitta mat than on degummed Am and B. mori mat (Fig. 7). The cell spreading on the different mats coated with collagen is comparable to that of tissue culture plastic treated with collagen as shown in Fig. 7. In the absence of collagen, cell spreading appeared restricted on all samples. Figure 8A presents the quantification of cell attachment (cell densities per surface area) and viability (Fig. 8B) on Am, degummed Am and Bm mats. All three silk types were found to be cytocompatible and did not display significant toxicity after coating with collagen. However, cell densities were significantly increased on TCP and Am than on degummed Am and Bm mats. Epi fluorescence microscopy revealed keratinocytes formed flattened cells with very tight cellular contacts both on and between individual fibroin fibers. These cells adhered poorly to native mats but adhered significantly better when the mats were first coated with collagen, consistent with their use of integrins such as α3β1 integrins to anchor to ECM and spread.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Epi fluorescence microscopy images of keratinocytes seeded on the different substrate after 24 h. Tissue culture plate (a,e), Am (b,f), Degummed Am (c,g) and Bm (d,h). (ad) Samples coated with collagen before cell seeding and (eh) no collagen. Scale bars represent 200 μm.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Keratinocytes efficiently attach on different silk mats. (A) Quantitative analysis of an adhesion assay of keratinocytes. (B) Viability assay of keratinocytes on different silk mats. The mats surface area covered by cells represented as a mean ± standard deviation of three fields studied for each type of mats. (C) denotes samples treated with collagen and N represents no collagen. Each point represents mean from three independent experiments. The error bars denote standard deviation, n = 3, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01 represent a significant statistical difference between control and different silk. The 2D image analysis was performed with ImageJ software.

The increased adhesion of cells on Am mats may be due to their high abundance in serine residues, their high mineralization level and the high content of sericin typical of these fibres Therefore, in addition to their comparatively rougher surface, such changes in physicochemical properties could make Am mats better substrates for cell attachment and growth than Bm mat. To understand the potential role of the glue-like sericin proteins that coat the non-extracted native Am, the cytocompatibility of pristine and degummed mats were compared. The % of glycine amino acid is high in A. mylitta cocoons as compared to Bombyx mori. Kaori Inoue58 reported that glycine is functionally active in human epidermal keratinocytes. We observed that pristine Am mats with sericin sustained the adhesion of higher cell densities whilst preserving excellent cytocompatibility. This occurred even after collagen treatment. This finding suggests that the Am mats and their natural sericin coating are interesting features for promoting the adhesion of keratinocytes, likely as a result of increased ECM protein deposition.

Conclusion

Wild silk mats display interesting features as a novel biomaterial for application in wound healing and tissue engineering. In particular, their unique dense morphology that mimic the dense basement membrane of epithelial tissues such as in the inter follicular epidermis of the skin, their natural ability to sustain cell adhesion, in the absence of collagen deposition, and their mineralization, which may provide useful cues for the proliferation and differentiation of stem cells. The surface morphology of Antheraea mylitta is relatively compact and rough but still displaying some micro porosity, compared to Bm silk mats. The physical properties of silk fibroin are altered by the occurrence of the β-sheet formation. Moreover, pristine Antheraea mylitta silk mats promote the adhesion of keratinocytes even in the absence of collagen coating, in contrast to Bombyx mori silk mats. Such impact on cell adhesion seems to be mediated by the natural sericin coatings of Am silk mats as this behaviour was not observed on degummed fibers. This study confirms the potential of native cocoons particularly of Indian tropical non-mulberry Antheraea mylitta origin as biomaterials for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. However, interesting challenges remain in the development of their use and fabrication. For example, Antheraea mylitta cannot be cultured in similar conditions to Bombyx mori, hence requiring the development of novel culture protocols for non-domesticated silk worms, or the genetic engineering of Bombyx mori to promote the formation of higher contents of sericin and accumulation of mineral components conferring unique physical and cytocompatibility properties to wild silks.

Methods

Materials

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, Trypsin and Versene (Thermofisher Scientific), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Labtech), L-Glutamine and Penicillin-Streptomycin (Invitrogen), Collagen type I (Corning), Calcein AM, Ethidium homodimer, Hoechst 33342 (Thermo fisher Scientific) were purchased for this experimentation. Sodium Carbonate (Na2CO3) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Tasar silk cocoons produced by Antheraea mylitta (Am) were procured from Warangal district in Telangana, India and Mulberry cocoons by Bombyx mori (Bm) silkworms were reared in our laboratory room at 22 ± 3 °C and 68 ± 7% relative humidity and fed with mulberry leaves until they spun cocoons. The cocoons were cut to separate the pupae after spinning.

Preparation of Silk mats

The silk mats were prepared as described by Armato59 and stored in sterile distilled water. Briefly, Am and Bm mats were prepared separately by degumming to remove the sericin by alkaline method (0.02 M Na2CO3) and dried in an oven at 50 °C for 3 days60. The mats of approximately 1 cm × 1 cm pieces were sterilized in 70% ethanol for 15 min followed by rinsing in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For cell culture, the individual mats were placed in 24-well cell culture plates and moistured with culture media before cells were added.

Biophysical Characterizations

Scanning electron microscopy

The surface morphologies of the Calcium oxalates, Am, degummed Am and Bm mats were obtained after gold sputtering using an S-3400N SEM; Hitachi, Japan and photographed at a voltage of 15 kV and room temperature.

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

The chemical composition of Calcium oxalates, Am, degummed Am and Bm mats were determined by EDX (INCA Penta FET 33, Oxford Instrument UK).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Measurements FTIR spectra of the Calcium oxalates, Am, degummed Am and Bm mats using KBr pellets were obtained on a NICOLET 6700, USA FTIR spectrometer with a spectral resolution from 4000 to 400 cm−1.

X- Ray Diffraction

To investigate the structure and crystallinity of the samples by XRD using a Philips XPERT-PRO with Cu-Ka radiation (λ1- 5405980 nm). Data was collected from 5 to 70 °C. The voltage and current of the X-ray source were 45 kV and 40 MA respectively, and the step size 2θ 0.001.

Differential Scanning Calorimeter measurement

DSC thermal scans were carried out on a Universal V4.5A TA instrument at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in a nitrogen flow 50 mL min−1 with the temperature ranging from 30 to 450 °C.

Thermogravimetric analysis

The changes in physical and chemical properties of materials are measured as a function of increasing temperature using a Universal V4.5A TA instrument with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 up to 800 °C.

Cell Culture

HaCaT human keratinocyte cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5 vol% CO2 and 21 vol% O2. At approximately 80–90% confluence, the cells were trypsinized for passaging. Mats were sterilized with 70% ethanol and washed with PBS. Samples were treated with collagen solution (concentration: 20 µg mL−1) for 20 min and washed with PBS and without collagen served as negative control. The mats were immersed in culture medium overnight before cell seeding. Each mat was placed in a well on a 24-well culture plate. A suspension of keratinocytes (2 × 104 cell mL−1) was seeded onto each silk mat, and cells were allowed to attach for 24 h at 37 °C. Cells cultured in a well without any material served as a control.

Cell morphology and imaging

The LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher) was used to observe the viability of keratinocytes within the silk mats constructs. After 24 h of growth, the seeded matrices were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, followed by membrane permeabilisation by 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Mats were washed with sterile PBS and immersed in PBS solution containing 2 mM calcein AM and 1 mM ethidium homodimer and incubated for 30 min. Then, Hoechst nuclear staining was performed for 5 min. Subsequently, the constructs were observed under a Leica DMI 4000B Epi fluorescence microscopy. The cell number was determined at three different locations for each sample using NIH ImageJ (1.49 V) software. At least five samples were tested for each time point and the experiments were repeated thrice.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance of differences was evaluated by one-way ANOVA with SPSS 20.0 statistical analysis package followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

Prof. Shyamkumar Vootla and Dr. Julien Gautrot thanks to Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi. India and United Kingdom India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI), British Council, United Kingdom, for funding of this project (DST/INT/UK/P-52). This work was supported by Commonwealth Academic Fellowship awarded to Prof. Shyamkumar Vootla by the Commonwealth Association of Universities, United Kingdom.

Author Contributions

D.G. has prepared silk mats and did its biophysical characterization. He contributed in ideating and writing the manuscript. D.K. performed cell culture experiments and also contributed in statistical data analysis of the manuscript. J.G. helped us in designing the experiment and in data interpretation and in the writing of the manuscript. S.V. first conceived the idea of silk mat preparation and planned the experiments and assisted in the experiments.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Darshan G. H., Dexu Kong, Julien Gautrot and Shyamkumar Vootla contributed equally to this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:613–21. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tan W, Krishnaraj R, Desai TA. Evaluation of nanostructured composite collagen-chitosan matrices for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:203–210. doi: 10.1089/107632701300062831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, Chapman JA. Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J. 1996;316:71–79. doi: 10.1042/bj3160001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stitzel JD, et al. Arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation on a novel biomimicking, biodegradable vascular graft scaffold. J Biomater Appl. 2001;16:22–33. doi: 10.1106/U2UU-M9QH-Y0BB-5GYL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Izquierdo R, et al. Biodegradable PCL scaffolds with an interconnected spherical pore network for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85(1):25–35. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marco S, Sarita RS, Jennifer LW, Antonios GM. Poly(lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2016;107:206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mario C, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of the PLGA microparticles in parotid gland. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(11):2412–2418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lisa IR, et al. Thermal and Mechanical Characterization of Electrospun Blends of Poly(lactic acid) and Poly(glycolic acid) Polymer Journal. 2006;38(11):1137–1145. doi: 10.1295/polymj.PJ2006062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Min BM, et al. Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1289–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim K, et al. Control of degradation rate and hydrophilicity in electrospun non-woven poly(D,L-lactide) nanofiber scaffolds for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4977–4985. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00407-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim TG, Park TG. Biomimicking extracellular matrix: cell adhesive RGD peptide modified electrospun Poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mesh. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:221–33. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chua KN, et al. Stable immobilization of rat hepatocyte spheroids on galactosylated nanofiber scaffold. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2537–2547. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.He W, Ma Z, Yong T, Teo WE, Ramakrishna S. Fabrication of collagen-coated biodegradable polymer nanofiber mesh and its potential for endothelial cells growth. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7606–15. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perez-Rigueiro J, Elices M, Llorca J, Viney C. Effect of degumming on the tensile properties of silkworm (Bombyx mori) silk fiber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2002;84(7):1431–1437. doi: 10.1002/app.10366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang P, et al. Tensile behavior and morphology of differently degummed silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoon silk fibres. Materials Letters. 2006;60(7):919–925. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bogush VG, Sokolova OS, Davydova LI, Klinov DV, Sidoruk KV. A novel model system for design of biomaterials based on recombinant analogs of spider silk proteins. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009;4(1):17–27. doi: 10.1007/s11481-008-9129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hardy JG, Scheibel TR. Silk-inspired polymers and proteins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:677–681. doi: 10.1042/BST0370677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Geoffrey CG, Sabine W, Yann B, Michael TL. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453:314–321. doi: 10.1038/nature07039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors Affecting Wound Healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219–229. doi: 10.1177/0022034509359125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kundu SC, Dash BC, Dash R. Natural protective glue protein, sericin bioengineered by silkworms: Potential for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2008;33:998–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kundu SC, et al. Invited review nonmulberry silk biopolymers. Biopolymers. 2012;97:455–467. doi: 10.1002/bip.22024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Masato O, et al. Interfacial behavior of fatty-acylated sericin prepared by lipase-catalyzed solid-phase synthesis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70:66–75. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takasu Y, Yamada H, Tsubouchi K. Isolation of three main sericin components from the cocoon of the silkworm, bombyx mori. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002;66:2715–2718. doi: 10.1271/bbb.66.2715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang YQ. Applications of natural silk protein sericin in biomaterials. Biotechnol Adv. 2002;20:91–100. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nayak S, Talukdar S, Kundu SC. Potential of 2D crosslinked sericin membranes with improved biostability for skin tissue engineering. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;347:783–794. doi: 10.1007/s00441-011-1269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Charu V, Kaplan DLS. as a Biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:991–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chenglong S, et al. & Hong, Xia. An antibacterial and absorbable silk-based fixation material with impressive mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Scientific Reports. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep37418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dash R, Mandal M, Ghosh SK, Kundu SC. Silk sericin protein of tropical tasar silkworm inhibits UVB-induced apoptosis in human skin keratinocytes. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;311:111–119. doi: 10.1007/s11010-008-9702-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Panilaitis B, et al. Macrophage responses to silk. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3079–3085. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou CZ, et al. Silk fibroin: structural Iimplications of a remarkable amino acid sequence. Protein Struct. Funct. Genet. 2001;44:119–122. doi: 10.1002/prot.1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Satoshi I, et al. Silk fibroin of Bombyx mori is secreted, assembling a high molecular mass elementary unit consisting of H-chain, L-chain, and P25, with a 6:6:1 molar ratio. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275(51):40517–40528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006897200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Darshan, G. H., Dexu, K., Julien, G. & Vootla, S. K. Fabrication and Characterization of Conductive Conjugated Polymer-Coated Antheraea mylitta Silk Fibroin Fibers for Biomedical Applications. Macromolecular bioscience. 17(7), 1–11 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Rupesh D, Soumen M, Kundu SC. Isolation, purification and characterization of silk protein sericin from cocoon peduncles of tropical tasar silkworm. Antheraea mylitta. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2006;38:255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Freddi G, Gotoh Y, Mori T, Tsutsui I, Tsukada M. Chemical structure and physical properties of Antheraea assama silk. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1994;52:775–781. doi: 10.1002/app.1994.070520608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Manas R, et al. Carbon Dioxide Gating in Silk Cocoon. Biointerphases. 2012;7(45):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13758-012-0045-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arai T, Freddi G, Innocenti R, Tsukada M. Biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin fibers and films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004;91(4):2383–2390. doi: 10.1002/app.13393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Denda M, Nakatani M, Ikeyama K, Tsutsumi M, Denda S. Epidermal keratinocytes as the forefront of the sensory system. Exp Dermatol. 2007;16:157–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2006.00529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dewitz J. Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung fuer All-gemeine Zoologie &. Physiologie der Tiere. 1921;38:365–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ohnishi E, Takahashi SY, Sonobe H, Hayashi T. Crystals from Cocoons of Malacosoma neustria testacea. Science. 1968;160:783–784. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3829.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Teigler DJ, Arnott HJ. Biological Sciences: X-ray Diffraction and Fine Structural Studies of Crystals in the Malpighian Tubules of Silkworms. Nature. 1972;235:166–7. doi: 10.1038/235166a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Akai H. Calcium crystals deposited in cocoons of wild silkmoths. Int. J. Wild Silkmoth & Silk. 2001;6:33–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Akai H, Nagashima T. Calcium crystals of cocoon shell from African ara Gonometa silkmoth (Lasiocampidae) Int. J. Wild Silkmoth & Silk. 2003;8:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nazarov R, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:718–26. doi: 10.1021/bm034327e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wei T, Mingzhong L, Chunxia Z. Structure and properties of regenerated Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin in aqueous solution. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2007;40:472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kundu RD, Dash SC, B. C., Dash R. Natural protective glue protein, sericin bioengineered by silkworms: Potential for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2008;33:998–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fraser, B. & MacRae, T. P. Conformation in Fibrous Proteins and Related Synthetic Polypeptides. Academic Press, New York (1973).
  • 47.Hu X, Kaplan D, Cebe P. Effect of water on thermal properties of silk fibroin. Thermochim Acta. 2007;461:137–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2006.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hu X, et al. Biomaterials from ultrasonication-induced silk fibroin-hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:3178–88. doi: 10.1021/bm1010504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang J, Rajkhowa R, Li JL, Liu SY, Wang XG. Silkworm cocoon as natural material and structure for thermal insulation. Mater Des. 2013;49:842–9. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang J, et al. Mechanical properties and structure of silkworm cocoons: a comparative study of Bombyx mori, Antheraea assamensis, Antheraea pernyi and Antheraea mylitta silkworm cocoons. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33:3206–13. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kurosaki S, Otsuka H. Fibroin allergy: IgE mediated hypersensitivity to silk suture materials. J Nippon Med Sch. 1999;66(1):41–44. doi: 10.1272/jnms.66.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Freddi G, Monti P, Nagura M, Gotoh Y, Tsukada M. Structure and Molecular Conformation of Tussah Silk Fibroin Films: Effect of Heat Treatment. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 1997;35(5):841–847. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19970415)35:5&#x0003c;841::AID-POLB13&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Haeyong K, Young HP. Dissolution and Characterization of Regenerated Antheraea pernyi Silk Fibroin. Journal of applied polymer science. 2000;82:750–758. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hoi-Yan C, Kin-Tak L, Xiao-Ming T, David H. A potential material for tissue engineering: Silkworm silk/PLA biocomposite. Composites: Part B. 2008;39:1026–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Groeber F, Holeiter M, Hampel M, Hinderer S, Schenke-Layland K. Skin tissue engineering — In vivo and in vitro applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2011;128:352–366. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hyoung-Joon J, Jingsong C, Vassilis K, Gregory HA, David LK. Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1039–1047. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tao L, Ruixin L, Yan Z, Yuxian Y, Yong G, Jing G, Jimin W, Zhihong L, Bo N, Shujie H, Xizheng Z. Preparation, Properties, and Cell Attachment/Growth Behavior of Chitosan/Acellular Derm Matrix Composite Materials. Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology. 2011;2:125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kaori I, Kentaro T, Mitsuhiro D. Functional glycine receptor in cultured human keratinocytes. Experimental Dermatology. 2015;24:296–319. doi: 10.1111/exd.12655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Armato, U., Dal, P. I., Motta, A., Migliaresi, C. & Kesenci, K. Method for the preparation of a non-woven silk fibroin fabric. Patent  US 2004/0097709 A1 (2004).
  • 60.Haesung Y, et al. Extraction conditions of Antheraea mylitta sericin with high yields and minimum molecular weight degradation. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2013;52:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES