ABSTRACT
Glacier forefield soils can provide a substantial sink for atmospheric CH4, facilitated by aerobic methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB). However, MOB activity, abundance, and community structure may be affected by soil age, MOB location in different forefield landforms, and temporal fluctuations in soil physical parameters. We assessed the spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric-CH4 oxidation in an Alpine glacier forefield during the snow-free season of 2013. We quantified CH4 flux in soils of increasing age and in different landforms (sandhill, terrace, and floodplain forms) by using soil gas profile and static flux chamber methods. To determine MOB abundance and community structure, we employed pmoA gene-based quantitative PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing. Uptake of CH4 increased in magnitude and decreased in variability with increasing soil age. Sandhill soils exhibited CH4 uptake rates ranging from −3.7 to −0.03 mg CH4 m−2 day−1. Floodplain and terrace soils exhibited lower uptake rates and even intermittent CH4 emissions. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that soil age and landform were the dominating factors shaping CH4 flux, followed by cumulative rainfall (weighted sum ≤4 days prior to sampling). Of 31 MOB operational taxonomic units retrieved, ∼30% were potentially novel, and ∼50% were affiliated with upland soil clusters gamma and alpha. The MOB community structures in floodplain and terrace soils were nearly identical but differed significantly from the highly variable sandhill soil communities. We concluded that soil age and landform modulate the soil CH4 sink strength in glacier forefields and that recent rainfall affects its short-term variability. This should be taken into account when including this environment in future CH4 inventories.
IMPORTANCE Oxidation of methane (CH4) in well-drained, “upland” soils is an important mechanism for the removal of this potent greenhouse gas from the atmosphere. It is largely mediated by aerobic, methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB). Whereas there is abundant information on atmospheric-CH4 oxidation in mature upland soils, little is known about this important function in young, developing soils, such as those found in glacier forefields, where new sediments are continuously exposed to the atmosphere as a result of glacial retreat. In this field-based study, we investigated the spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric-CH4 oxidation and associated MOB communities in Alpine glacier forefield soils, aiming at better understanding the factors that shape the sink for atmospheric CH4 in this young soil ecosystem. This study contributes to the knowledge on the dynamics of atmospheric-CH4 oxidation in developing upland soils and represents a further step toward the inclusion of Alpine glacier forefield soils in global CH4 inventories.
KEYWORDS: atmospheric-methane oxidation, glacier forefield soil, high-affinity MOB, methanotroph, methane flux, proglacial landforms, pmoA
INTRODUCTION
Aerobic oxidation of the potent greenhouse gas methane (CH4) is one of many important ecosystem services provided by soils (1, 2). It is mediated by methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB), which can utilize CH4 as a sole source of carbon and energy (3). The activity of MOB in soils can substantially attenuate CH4 emissions to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources, such as wetlands, rice paddies, and landfills (4–6). Moreover, in well-drained (upland) soils, so-called “high-affinity” MOB are capable of utilizing atmospheric CH4 at ambient concentrations (≤1.8 μl liter−1) (7). As a result, upland soils are usually a sink for atmospheric CH4. In fact, they are CH4's only known terrestrial sink, contributing ∼5 to 15% of the total loss of CH4 from the atmosphere (8–10).
As cultivation attempts with high-affinity MOB have been mostly unsuccessful, to date (Methylocystis sp. strain SC2 is the only potential high-affinity MOB isolate [11]), molecular and biochemical methods are employed for their identification in upland soils. Identification is typically based on the amplification of the pmoA gene, a widely used MOB biomarker that closely reflects phylogenies based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (e.g., see reference 12). The pmoA gene encodes a subunit of the particulate form of the enzyme methane monooxygenase (pMMO), which catalyzes the first step in the oxidation of CH4 (3, 13). Based on pmoA, high-affinity MOB have mainly been assigned to the upland soil cluster (USC) alpha and gamma clades, and it was noted that they are distantly related to two groups of cultivable MOB, i.e., type II and type I, respectively (14–16). High-affinity MOB have been studied intensively in mature upland soils (e.g., tundra, forests, grasslands, savannahs, and deserts [17–21]), but only limited information is available on their performance in young, developing upland soils (e.g., recent volcanic deposits or proglacial sediments).
Whereas developing upland soils are still excluded from national and global CH4 inventories (e.g., see references 8 and 22), recent studies indicate that they may provide a substantial sink for atmospheric CH4. For example, Hawaiian volcanic deposits (andosols [FAO soil classification]) were found to be a sink for atmospheric CH4 already 40 years after deposition. They exhibit CH4 uptake rates (expressed by convention as negative soil-atmosphere CH4 flux values) of −1.8 to −0.7 mg CH4 m−2 day−1, similar to those of mature forest and grassland soils (22). Atmospheric-CH4 oxidation was also detected in proglacial sediments from both Arctic (23) and Alpine (24, 25) environments. Specifically, young Alpine proglacial sediments, referred to here as glacier forefield soils (lithosols [FAO soil classification]), can provide a substantial sink for atmospheric CH4 already at an early stage of soil development (<15 years; up to −0.7 mg CH4 m−2 day−1) (26). As the extent of glacier forefields is expected to increase further with ongoing glacial retreat (26, 27), it is important to better understand the factors modulating community composition and activity of high-affinity MOB in this developing soil environment.
Glacier forefields are heterogeneous and dynamic environments which exhibit features that render their soils interesting but challenging systems for the study of microbial structures and functions. First, glacier forefields often feature a well-defined sequence of soil ages (soil chronosequence) (e.g., see references 28 to 30). This is a result of glacial retreat, when sediments are successively subjected to a radical shift from a subglacial to a proglacial environment, whereby soil formation is initiated. Thus, a soil chronosequence is a good model ecosystem for studies of microbial primary succession (e.g., see reference 31). Second, glacier forefield soils can be derived from diverse bedrock types. As bedrock type is a key factor determining nutrient availability, it may shape microbial communities in glacier forefield soils (31, 32). Third, the cooccurrence of different geomorphological processes (e.g., glacial erosion and deposition, debris movement, and physical and chemical weathering) can lead to the formation of numerous proglacial landforms (33, 34). Individual landforms often exhibit specific physicochemical properties, which may affect microbial community composition and activity. Finally, glacier forefield soils are also subject to dramatic short-term and seasonal variability in, e.g., physical parameters such as soil temperature and water content, which are known to affect the performance of microbial communities, including high-affinity MOB (e.g., see reference 9). Whereas such variability is usually low during the snow-covered season (35, 36), with the melting of snow the glacier forefield soils undergo sudden changes in soil water content, and they can be subject to large fluctuations in temperature and water regimens throughout the snow-free season (e.g., see references 37 to 39).
In a recent field study, we investigated atmospheric-CH4 oxidation and MOB community composition along soil chronosequences (soil age, 6 to 120 years) in two Swiss glacier forefields situated on contrasting (siliceous versus calcareous) bedrock types (39). Soil age was found to be the main factor affecting atmospheric-CH4 uptake, which increased with increasing soil age and ranged from −2.2 to −0.08 mg CH4 m−2 day−1. In contrast, observed differences in MOB community composition were related mainly to bedrock type rather than to soil age, indicating that distinct, low-diversity MOB communities provided similar ecosystem services in the two forefields. However, as field sampling was restricted to two time points during the snow-free season and a single proglacial landform, the temporal variability of and effects of different landforms on atmospheric-CH4 oxidation and MOB community composition in glacier forefield soils remained unknown.
Thus, the objectives for the present study were (i) to investigate temporal variability in atmospheric-CH4 oxidation and MOB community composition as a function of soil age along an established glacier forefield soil chronosequence, (ii) to assess the effects of different landforms on the soil CH4 sink within a single soil age class, and (iii) to provide an improved, high-resolution analysis of MOB diversity in glacier forefield soils. To this end, we conducted field campaigns to quantify soil-atmosphere CH4 flux throughout the snow-free season of 2013 (Fig. 1), and targeted amplicon sequencing was used to assess MOB diversity and community composition in soil samples collected during this period. We employed linear mixed-effects (LME) models to test the dependence of the response variables soil-atmosphere CH4 flux and MOB abundance on the model predictors soil age, landform, sampling time point, soil temperature, soil water content, and cumulative rainfall.
FIG 1.
Sampling locations at the Griessfirn Glacier forefield, mapped using Swiss square-projection coordinates (CH1903). Soil chronosequence locations are delimited according to soil age class (A, 0 to 20 years; B, 20 to 50 years; and C, 50 to 120 years). (Inset) Landform locations distinguish sandhill (S), terrace (T), and floodplain (F) landforms.
RESULTS
Soil physical parameters.
Soil water content was low at all sampling locations and time points, indicating that glacier forefield soils remained relatively dry throughout the snow-free season (Fig. 2a). Data from locations A to C indicate that topsoil was generally drier than bulk soil, with seasonal mean water contents ranging from 0.06 to 0.09 m3 m−3 for topsoil and from 0.10 to 0.12 m3 m−3 for bulk soil. Furthermore, topsoil water content increased with increasing soil age (from locations A to C) (Fig. 2a). The highest temporal variability in soil water content at individual locations was measured in soil age class A (topsoil, 0.04 to 0.09 m3 m−3; bulk soil, 0.06 to 0.19 m3 m−3) (data not shown). Among landform locations, the highest topsoil water content was observed at location F sites (Fig. 2a). Water content data for location S sites agreed reasonably well with topsoil data measured in close proximity, at location B sites, although different measurement techniques were employed.
FIG 2.
Heat maps showing median values for volumetric soil water content (a), soil temperature (b), and soil-atmosphere CH4 flux (c) measured at soil chronosequence locations (A, B, and C) and landform locations (S, T, and F). For soil temperature and water content, “t” refers to topsoil measurements, and “b” refers to averaged (bulk soil) measurements across all depths. The column at right shows seasonal mean values ± 1 SD; white areas indicate that no measurements were performed on the corresponding dates.
After an initial increase in July following snow melting, the soil temperature decreased during the remainder of the snow-free season (from August to October) (Fig. 2b). During this period, the median topsoil temperature at locations A to C decreased ∼12°C, on average, whereas the bulk soil temperature decreased ∼8°C, on average. Moreover, bulk soil temperature moderately increased with increasing soil age (from locations A to C).
Rainfall events were quite evenly distributed throughout the sampling season, with a maximum of six dry days between any two consecutive events (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Calculated cumulative rainfall rates ranged from 0.7 to 13.2 mm day−1, with a mean value of 5.1 mm day−1.
Soil-atmosphere CH4 flux. (i) Chronosequence locations A to C.
Nearly all CH4 concentrations measured in soil gas profiles were subatmospheric (example profiles are shown in Fig. S3), with a few measurements in the youngest soils falling at or slightly above the atmospheric value. As a result, soils at locations A to C exhibited mostly net CH4 uptake during the sampling season (Fig. 2c). Median fluxes on individual sampling dates ranged from −2.34 to −0.03 mg CH4 m−2 day−1, with no apparent temporal trend. However, CH4 uptake increased substantially with increasing soil age. For example, the seasonal mean uptake rate was −0.30 mg CH4 m−2 day−1 for location A sites and −1.31 mg CH4 m−2 day−1 for location C sites (Fig. 2c). Conversely, the temporal variability of soil CH4 concentrations and flux at individual locations was highest in the youngest soils (location A sites) and decreased with increasing soil age (Fig. S3). The highest spatial variability in CH4 flux was also measured at location A sites (not shown).
(ii) Landform locations S, T, and F.
The three landforms exhibited substantial differences in soil-atmosphere CH4 flux (Fig. 2c). Sites at location S exhibited substantial CH4 uptake throughout the sampling season (median CH4 flux of −0.54 to −0.11 mg CH4 m−2 day−1). However, on comparing CH4 uptake rates between adjacent locations S and B (Fig. 1), estimates for location B sites were ∼3-fold larger than the CH4 uptake measured at location S sites. This may be due in part to the different methods employed to estimate/measure CH4 flux. A slight apparent trend of decreasing CH4 uptake with the ongoing sampling season at location S sites (Fig. 2c) was refuted by the LME model (see below). Uptake of CH4 measured at locations T and F was substantially less than that at location S. In fact, positive CH4 flux values for locations T and F even indicated intermittent net CH4 emissions, particularly early in the sampling season (Fig. 2c). Similar spatial variabilities in CH4 flux were observed for all landforms (not shown).
Abundance of MOB.
High-quality genomic DNA was isolated from all samples but S1-Jul25, which was consequently excluded from all further molecular analyses. pmoA copy numbers spanned 3 orders of magnitude, ranging from 8 × 102 to 5 × 105 copies per g of dry soil (Fig. 3). At locations A to C, pmoA copy numbers increased substantially with soil age, and the highest copy numbers were detected in location C samples. The highest pmoA copy numbers among different landforms were obtained for location S samples (similar in magnitude to those for location B samples), whereas landform location F samples exhibited the lowest pmoA copy numbers, which were slightly lower than the copy numbers for location T samples. Notably, pmoA copy numbers for locations C and F differed significantly from those for other sampling locations (A, B, S, and T) (based on Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests). Whereas location F samples showed the lowest variability in pmoA copy number during the sampling season, location C samples by far exhibited the highest spatial and temporal variability (Fig. 3).
FIG 3.

Box-and-whisker plot showing the total (spatial and temporal) variabilities in MOB abundance (pmoA gene copy number per gram of dry soil) for all samples collected for molecular analyses at soil chronosequence (A, B, and C) and landform (S, T, and F) locations (Table S1). The bottom and top of each box indicate the first and third quartiles, and the horizontal line inside the box shows the second quartile (median). Whiskers indicate maximum and minimum values.
Diversity of MOB communities.
We obtained an average of ∼130,000 pmoA sequences per sample, distributed among sampling locations as follows: 87,000 ± 43,000 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) at location A sites, 115,000 ± 43,000 at location B sites, 184,000 ± 82,000 at location C sites, 131,000 ± 26,000 at location S sites, 154,000 ± 78,000 at location T sites, and 147,000 ± 66,000 at location F sites. High-throughput sequencing of pmoA genes allowed identification of 31 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Analysis of the phylogenetic distance of the protein-derived pmoA partial sequences showed that most retrieved OTUs grouped with MOB-like sequences (Fig. 4). Half of the MOB-like OTUs grouped with either type Ic (mostly USC-gamma) or type IIb (mostly USC-alpha) sequences. Twenty percent of the MOB-like OTUs clustered with type Ib, 13% with type IIa, and 7% with type Ia. The remaining 10% of OTUs clustered with the pmoA/amoA-like group, designated for sequences clustering between the pmoA gene and the homologous amoA gene of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. The applied taxonomic system for pmoA genes follows one reported previously (40). Thirty percent of the MOB-like OTUs were previously undetected pmoA sequences, which may represent novel species. Specifically, OTUs 07, 18, and 28 branched with USC-gamma but showed low nucleotide sequence identity with known pmoA sequences (79 to 86%) (Fig. 4). Similarly, OTUs 09 and 23 branched with type IIb and showed identities of 75% and 84%, respectively, with publicly available pmoA sequences. The OTUs grouping with pmoA/amoA-like sequences and OTU 31 (type IIa) also showed low identities with known pmoA sequences.
FIG 4.
Maximum likelihood tree with 100-bootstrap support showing the phylogenetic affiliation of the pmoA gene based on the derived amino acid sequence (partial sequence [150 amino acids]). Bootstrap numbers are shown for branches with bootstrap support of ≥50. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) retrieved in this study are depicted in bold. GenBank accession numbers for representative sequences deposited in the database are given in parentheses. Clusters that do not include OTUs from this study are collapsed. The scale bar represents 0.2 change per amino acid position.
The presence and relative abundances of OTUs indicated the highest variability and alpha diversity at locations A to C and S (all part of the sandhill landform) (Fig. 5), whereas the lowest variability and alpha diversity were measured at locations T and F. Among the few exceptions were the ubiquitous and most abundant OTUs 01 (type Ic) and 02 (type IIb). Thirty-five percent of the retrieved OTUs were found only in the sandhill landform, with some OTUs being further specific to location C sites.
FIG 5.
Heat map showing the presence and relative abundances of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) retrieved through targeted pmoA gene amplicon sequencing. Individual samples are displayed on the x axis for soil chronosequence (A, B, and C) and landform (S, T, and F) locations, separated by a dashed line. OTUs shown on the y axis are grouped according to their phylogenetic affiliation (40). The average alpha diversity value ± 1 SD (Simpson index [D]; one-dimensional notation) is shown for all sampling locations. Higher values indicate higher diversity.
Analysis of the beta diversity of MOB communities in glacier forefield soils revealed similar results, i.e., significant differences in community composition related to landform (permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA]; P = 0.04) (Fig. 6). Based on pairwise tests among landform locations, MOB communities in location S samples differed significantly from communities in both location F (P = 4 × 10−3) and T (P = 6 × 10−3) samples, whereas no significant differences in community composition were detected between locations S and A to C. In fact, the high total variability in MOB community composition in location S samples put these communities closer to those at locations A to C than to those at locations T and F (Fig. 6). Total variability was comprised of both spatial and temporal variabilities; the latter was particularly noticeable at locations A and B (Fig. S4). Conversely, MOB community compositions at locations T and F were almost identical (with T and F data points plotting in the same region in space [Fig. 6]) and showed little variability.
FIG 6.
Principal coordinate analysis of MOB community beta diversity calculated with the weighted UniFrac metric. Average MOB community beta diversity values are shown for chronosequence (A, B, and C) and landform (S, T, and F) locations, with error bars (± 1 SD) representing total, i.e., spatial and temporal, variability. Together, the PCoA 1 and PCoA 2 axes explain 94.3% of the total variance. Average MOB community dissimilarities between and within sampling locations (A, B, C, S, T, and F) are displayed in the inset.
Linear mixed-effects model.
Several trends perceived in the soil physical data were confirmed to be significant by the LME model. For example, topsoil water content at locations A to C increased significantly with increasing soil age, whereas soil water content at locations S, T, and F was significantly influenced by the predictors sampling time point and landform (Table 1). On the other hand, soil temperature significantly decreased over the sampling season at all locations, whereas it significantly increased with increasing soil age at locations A to C.
TABLE 1.
P values of LME models fitted to sample time series of chronosequence (A to C) and landform (S, T, and F) locationsa
| Predictor | Correlation, P value for response variableb |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil-atmosphere CH4 fluxc |
MOB abundance |
Soil water content |
Soil temp |
|||||||
| Locations A to C | Locations S, T, and F | Locations A to C | Locations S, T, and F | Locations A to C |
Locations S, T, and F |
Locations A to C |
Locations S, T, and F |
|||
| b | t | t | b | t | t | |||||
| Soil age | −, 5.7 × 10−3 | NA | +, 7.5 × 10−3 | NA | NS | +, 5.3 × 10−3 | NA | +, 2.5 × 10−5 | +, 4.9 × 10−3 | NA |
| Landformd | NA | 2.8 × 10−5 | NA | 1.3 × 10−4 | NA | NA | 0.013 | NA | NA | NS |
| Sampling time point | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | −, 1.8 × 10−3 | −, 2.2 × 10−16 | −, 2.2 × 10−12 | −, 1.86 × 10−5 |
| Cumulative rainfall | −, 0.015 | +, 0.032 | +, 0.039 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NA | NA | NA |
We tested the dependence of the response variables soil-atmosphere CH4 flux and MOB abundance on the predictors soil age, landform, sampling time point, cumulative rainfall, soil temperature, and volumetric soil water content (the data for the predictors soil temperature and soil water content are not shown, as individual P values were not significant). In addition, we also tested the dependence of bulk soil (b) and topsoil (t) temperature and water content on soil age, landform, sampling time point, and cumulative rainfall.
+, positive correlation; −, negative correlation; NS, not significant (P ≥ 0.05); NA, not applicable.
Note that CH4 uptake is expressed by convention as a negative soil-atmosphere flux value. Thus, a negative correlation of soil-atmosphere flux with a predictor (e.g., soil age) indicates a positive correlation of CH4 uptake with these predictors, and vice versa.
The direction of correlation is not applicable.
Soil CH4 uptake significantly increased with increasing soil age (locations A to C) (Table 1). In addition, CH4 flux was significantly affected by landform (locations S, T, and F). The results of the LME model further revealed that other than soil age and landform, the only predictor significantly influencing CH4 flux was cumulative rainfall, whereas soil temperature and soil water content were not significant (P ≥ 0.05) predictors (not shown). The perceived trend of decreasing CH4 uptake with the ongoing sampling season for location S sites was refuted as not significant by the LME model.
The results of the LME model fits further indicated that the observed increase in MOB abundance with soil age at locations A to C was statistically significant and that MOB abundance was also significantly affected by landform (locations S, T, and F) (Table 1). As in the case of CH4 flux, soil temperature and soil water content did not significantly influence MOB abundance (not shown).
DISCUSSION
Temporal variability of the soil CH4 sink as a function of soil age.
Soil-atmosphere CH4 flux exhibited substantial temporal variability at locations A to C during the snow-free season. This variability was clearly attenuated with increasing soil age (Fig. 2c; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Thus, not only is soil age the main factor affecting the strength of the soil CH4 sink (39), but increasing soil age also contributes to the stability of atmospheric-CH4 uptake in these developing soils. In this context, soil age serves as a proxy for all edaphic factors that change with soil development. The importance of soil age in modulating the soil CH4 sink was corroborated by our LME model, in which soil age was the main environmental factor (P = 5.7 × 10−3) (Table 1) explaining CH4 flux.
Temporal variability in soil physical parameters (Fig. 2a and b) appeared to have little effect on CH4 flux in glacier forefield soils. A weak dependence on soil temperature was previously explained by gas diffusion being the main, but only mildly temperature-dependent, factor limiting atmospheric-CH4 uptake (9, 18). Low soil water content and thus a high CH4 availability in these fast-draining glacier forefield soils (39) may partially explain the lack of an expected dependence of CH4 flux on soil water content (e.g., see reference 9). In addition, small but potentially important variations in soil water content may have been masked by the measurement uncertainty (0.04 m3 m−3), which was often large compared to measured values, in particular for topsoils (0.038 to 0.12 m3 m−3) (Fig. 2a).
Conversely, atmospheric-CH4 uptake at locations A to C showed a significant, positive dependence on cumulative rainfall (P = 0.015) (Table 1). At first glance, this result appears to be at odds with our findings for soil water content. However, it may indicate that atmospheric-CH4 uptake in these soils was at least occasionally limited by water availability, i.e., when the latter dropped below the lower limit of favorable conditions (∼20% water saturation) (41, 42). At a low soil water content, water exists primarily in small pores and as films coating mineral particles (43, 44). Through continued evaporation, water films may disappear and soil water be present only in the form of small pendular rings between particles (45, 46). Under these conditions, microorganisms inhabiting particle surfaces will be faced with highly unfavorable conditions, which can lead to cessation of their primary metabolism. Cumulative rainfall can be seen as an integrative parameter accounting for recent rainfall events, which replenish water films (47) and thus contribute to maintaining or reestablishing microbial activity. Therefore, MOB survival and activity may strongly depend on cell distribution among microhabitats and, potentially, small changes in soil water content (e.g., see reference 48).
Total variability in MOB community composition at locations A to C (Fig. 6) included a substantial amount of temporal variability (Fig. S4), which is in agreement with previous findings on the variability of total microbial community composition in other glacier forefields (e.g., see reference 49). In particular, MOB communities sampled at locations B1 and B2 during our first campaign (June 18) markedly differed from communities sampled at later time points at these locations. This shift in MOB community composition may be a consequence of changes in environmental conditions that occurred during and immediately after snow melting (50). Although high-affinity MOB are thought to be slow-growing microorganisms (51), the observed temporal variability in community composition indicated that they are capable of promptly adapting to changes in environmental conditions. This may be facilitated, for instance, by the ubiquitous Methylocystis-like MOB (Fig. 4 and 5), which may switch to a dormant stage (cysts) under unfavorable conditions and rapidly initiate excystation once conditions become favorable, thus bypassing the growing phase (e.g., see reference 52).
Effect of landform on the soil CH4 sink.
Our measurements indicated substantial differences between landforms in their contributions to the overall soil CH4 sink of glacier forefields; seasonal mean CH4 uptake at locations F and T was significantly lower than that at location S (Fig. 2). As our measurements represent net fluxes, i.e., the sum of simultaneous CH4 transport, production, and consumption (53), differences in any of these processes may explain differences in CH4 flux between the landforms. Although we were unable to distinguish between individual processes, occasionally observed CH4 emissions at locations F and T support the presence of a CH4 source of as yet unknown origin in these calcareous glacier forefield soils (54). We found no evidence of microbial CH4 production on screening of the top 15 cm of soils at locations S, F, and T for presence of the mcrA gene, a biomarker for methanogenic Archaea (data not shown). However, we cannot fully exclude the possibility of microbial CH4 production in deeper, water-logged soils at locations F and T. Alternatively, the CH4 source may be related to slow dissolution of carbonate rock or particle aggregates in water-logged soils, thereby releasing entrapped CH4 (54).
Low CH4 uptake at locations F and T may also have resulted from low CH4 availability due to gas diffusion limitation, particularly at location F (9), or from lower MOB abundances at locations F and T than at location S. The latter may be related to differences in soil texture between landforms. A particle size analysis of the <2-mm fraction of soils from locations S, F, and T showed that the clay and silt contents were significantly higher in the location S samples (E.-M. Rainer, E. Chiri, and M. H. Schroth, unpublished data). Bacterial biomass associated with mineral particles has been shown to be substantially higher in clay-silt minerals than in sand (55, 56), likely because microhabitats in fine mineral aggregates provide more favorable conditions for bacterial functioning (e.g., see reference 57). Fine mineral aggregates may have been washed out of soils at locations F and T as a result of flash floods during snow melting or summer rainstorms.
Diversity of glacier forefield MOB communities.
Our study employed a high-throughput sequencing technique (amplicon sequencing on a MiSeq platform [Illumina]) to investigate pmoA gene-based MOB diversity in young, developing glacier forefield soils. Using this technique, the number of identified OTUs was ∼6-fold larger than that in MOB diversity studies based on pmoA gene sequencing of clone libraries (25, 58).
Functional gene diversity can be low in extreme environments, such as glacier forefields (59). Nonetheless, we retrieved 31 OTUs (of which 30% were previously undetected pmoA sequences), which embrace all phylogenetic affiliations identified in previous studies. The USC-gamma clade was most prominent in all samples in terms of presence and relative abundance, as reported in a previous study of Alpine glacier forefield soils (25). These data confirm that high-affinity, USC-gamma MOB are widespread in Alpine soil environments (12, 39, 60). In addition, high-affinity MOB belonging to USC-alpha were prominently detected in the Griessfirn Alpine glacier forefield, likely as a result of using a high-throughput sequencing technique. Three other OTUs grouped with the Methylocystis-like cluster, including the ubiquitous and second most abundant OTU, OTU 02. This agrees with previous findings in which a well-represented Methylocystis-like OTU was exclusively retrieved from glacier forefield soils on calcareous bedrock (25). It may indicate that Methylocystis-like MOB possess an ecological advantage in calcareous glacier forefield soils, which may be linked to the existence of two pMMO isoenzymes, with different affinities for low (2 to 600 μl liter−1) and high (>600 μl liter−1) CH4 concentrations, previously detected in cultures of a Methylocystis strain (11). Thus, Methylocystis-like MOB may profit from transient release of CH4 (at elevated concentrations) entrapped in calcareous soil aggregates (54).
Conclusions.
This study contributes to our knowledge on the dynamics of atmospheric-CH4 oxidation and MOB communities in developing soils and provides supporting evidence to include mountainous lithosols in global CH4 inventories. Different landforms and their relative extents in a glacier forefield clearly modulate the overall CH4 sink strength. We confirmed that the soil CH4 sink and the MOB community driving the latter are subject to temporal and spatial variability during the snow-free season. Further work is needed to elucidate the underlying cause of this variability. Hence, to fully characterize atmospheric-CH4 oxidation in this heterogeneous environment, an integrative approach will be required, combining, e.g., areal imagery and landscape classification maps with eddy covariance measurements of CH4 flux. Finally, field studies of CH4 oxidation during the snow-covered season, as well as investigations of interannual changes in CH4 oxidation, are still needed to give more comprehensive knowledge on atmospheric-CH4 oxidation dynamics in Alpine environments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field site.
We performed sampling and measurements in the forefield of Griessfirn Glacier (Canton Uri, Switzerland), which has been described extensively elsewhere (39, 54). Sampling locations were positioned along two transects (Fig. 1). For the first transect, eight locations were selected along a well-defined soil chronosequence with increasing distance from the glacier terminus, on a band of lateral debris deposits (a landform referred to here as a sandhill). They represent a subset of sampling locations previously installed and categorized into three soil age classes (location A, 0 to 20 years; location B, 20 to 50 years; and location C, 50 to 120 years) (39). In the present study, each soil age class comprised 2 or 3 sampling locations.
The second transect was located in soil age class B and comprised five sampling locations each in floodplain (F), terrace (T), and sandhill (S) landforms (Fig. 1, inset), which were identified based on topographical features. Floodplains may be described as streamlined bed forms parallel to the glacial stream, which feature a shallow groundwater table. In contrast, terraces are elevated, ancient floodplains that present dryer conditions with a deeper groundwater table, but otherwise they exhibit a structure similar to that of floodplains. Finally, sandhills are depicted as an unoriented hummocky landform exhibiting a disorganized deposition pattern and the deepest groundwater table among the three landforms (34).
Sampling and measurement procedures.
At locations A to C, we employed the soil gas profile method to determine soil-atmosphere CH4 flux (milligrams of CH4 per square meter per day) (e.g., see reference 19). To this end, depth-resolved soil gas samples were collected using a polyuse multilevel sampling system (61). Details of the installation, sampling, and measurement procedures were described previously (54). Soil gas sampling was performed under dry weather conditions during nine sampling campaigns in 2013 (June to October) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Sampling started on June 18, when most of the glacier forefield was still snow covered, followed by more frequent sampling shortly after the snow melted (July 2 to 18). The sampling frequency was reduced toward the end of the snow-free season. Concurrent with soil gas sampling, we measured the depth-resolved volumetric soil water content (cubic meters per cubic meter of soil) (PR2/6 capacitance probe; Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom) at each location, and we recorded the depth-resolved soil temperature (iButton temperature loggers; Maxim Integrated, San Jose, CA) in 1-h intervals throughout the sampling season for one location per soil age group (Table S1). We report topsoil water content and temperature by using the uppermost measurement points (7.5 to 10 cm in depth) and bulk soil values by using the mean for all measured depths (7.5 to 97.5 cm).
For locations S, T, and F, we used the static flux chamber method to quantify CH4 flux (e.g., see reference 62). Deployment of polyvinyl chloride chambers (31-cm diameter × 27-cm height) took place shortly after the snow melted (July 9 and 10). Chambers comprised a base collar inserted ∼15 cm into the ground. To allow soil consolidation around the collars, an idle phase of 8 days (which included several rainfall events) followed chamber installation. Flux chamber measurements were performed during six sampling campaigns (July 18 to September 19) (Table S1). For measurements, collars were fitted with gaskets and detachable lids, resulting in chamber headspace volumes ranging from 9.2 to 11.4 liters. Each lid featured an aluminum foil cap, to minimize temperature increases in the headspace from solar irradiation, and a port connected to a three-way valve, which allowed extraction of 20-ml gas samples from the headspace by use of a gastight syringe. Measurement periods lasted 90 min, with four gas samples collected at regular time intervals. Gas samples were immediately transferred to serum bottles capped with butyl rubber stoppers for subsequent analysis of the CH4 concentration. Concurrent with flux chamber measurements, topsoil water content was quantified by time domain reflectometry (TDR100; Campbell Scientific, Loughborough, United Kingdom) at 2 or 3 spots per landform in the close vicinity of the flux chambers, using pairs of 30-cm-long brass rods permanently installed in the ground. Nearby, the topsoil temperature was measured at a depth of 11 cm at 1-h intervals, using iButton temperature loggers mounted on wooden rods.
A total of 56 soil samples were collected for molecular analyses on 6 days over the course of the sampling season (Table S1). Soil was collected from all eight sampling sites at locations A to C and from a total of nine sampling sites at locations S, T, and F. Details of the soil-sampling procedure were described previously (39). Individual samples and measurements are referred to by sampling location (A, B, C, S, F, or T) and number (1 to 5) and by sampling time point (date), e.g., A1-Jul02 or F5-Jul25.
Data for daily rainfall (millimeters per day) were obtained from the nearest automated weather station of the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss). Cumulative rainfall (millimeters per day) for each sampling date was calculated as the weighted sum of daily rainfall within 4 days prior to sampling, using an exponential decay function with a decay constant of 1 day−1 for weighting (i.e., the effect of preceding rainfall was halved every 16.6 h).
Determination of soil-atmosphere CH4 flux.
Methane concentrations in all soil gas samples were quantified on a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (63). To determine soil-atmosphere CH4 flux at locations A to C, analytical solutions to a steady-state diffusion-reaction model were fitted to individual soil CH4 profiles in the R v3.2.1 software environment (64). Analytical solutions assumed CH4 oxidation to be governed either by a single first-order reaction over the entire profile (65) (referred to here as the one-layer model) or by individual first-order reactions in two distinct (top and bottom) soil layers (39) (referred to here as the two-layer model). Applying Fick's first law of diffusion, we then computed the flux from the CH4 concentration gradient at the soil-atmosphere boundary and best-fit parameters of that model, which yielded better agreement with measured soil CH4 profiles. In cases where model convergence failed, CH4 concentration gradients and fluxes were approximated by linear regression (39). For locations S, T, and F, flux values were obtained from the slope of CH4 concentrations in the flux chambers plotted against measurement time by linear regression analysis (e.g., see reference 66).
pmoA gene marker-based molecular analyses of the MOB community. (i) Total DNA isolation and pmoA gene amplification.
Genomic DNA was isolated using a FastDNASpin kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH) according to the manufacturer's instructions, with minor modifications. Recovery and purity of the DNA extracts were tested prior to further molecular analyses. Applied protocols for DNA extraction and quality control were described previously (39). Amplification of the pmoA gene was the first step for all subsequent molecular techniques applied in this study. Primer sequences and amplification procedures are reported in Table S2.
(ii) qPCR.
To determine MOB abundance, copies of pmoA genes in DNA extracts were quantified by quantitative PCR (qPCR) on an ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems [now Thermo Fischer Scientific], Waltham, MA). Quantification of pmoA copy numbers followed a previously described procedure (67) and the assay specifications shown in Table S2. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. The efficiencies of the three assays performed were always ∼100%, with R2 values above 0.99.
(iii) Targeted amplicon sequencing.
For each sample, we prepared, indexed, and paired-end sequenced amplicon libraries of the pmoA gene from genomic DNA extracts according to the targeted amplicon sequencing method (68). Primer sequences and amplification procedures are reported in Table S2. Amplicon library preparation, high-throughput amplicon sequencing, and sequence data processing are described in detail in the supplemental material.
Statistical analyses. (i) Linear mixed-effects models.
Using lme4 v1.1-10 (69) in R v3.2.1, LME models were fitted to sample time series, with random effects included for individual sampling locations. The drop1 function was used to find the optimal LME model for each response variable, based on the Akaike information criterion. We tested the dependence of the response variables CH4 flux and MOB abundance on the model predictors soil age, landform, sampling time point, cumulative rainfall, soil temperature, and water content. Initial checks indicated a correlation between soil temperature and sampling time point, and thus an additional interaction term between these variables was included. Where residual diagnostics indicated nonlinearity and/or nonnormality, variables were log transformed (soil age, MOB abundance, cumulative rainfall, and sampling time point) or arcsine transformed (all water content data). Missing values were replaced with the mean for the respective soil age group or landform.
(ii) Diversity and structure of MOB communities.
Phylogenetic distances of the assigned operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were assessed through nucleotide sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building on the derived-protein level, using the software Seaview v4.5.4 (70). To identify the best evolution model, we tested 96 amino acid substitution models by using the software ModelGenerator v0.851 (71) and selected the one showing the lowest value for the Akaike information criterion. A phylogenetic tree was built according to the maximum likelihood method, with 100-bootstrap support, using the phylogeny software PhyLM v3.1 (72).
To assess the alpha diversity of MOB communities, we computed Simpson indices (D) and visualized the results in one-dimensional notation, in which alpha diversity ranges from 0 (low diversity) to 1 (high diversity). We further employed Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests to assess differences in alpha diversity between sample locations (A, B, C, S, T, and F). To identify factors explaining differences in community structure, we analyzed the beta diversity of MOB communities (defined as the variation in composition between a set of communities) coupled with standard multivariate statistics (73, 74). Alpha and beta diversity calculations, as well as read count normalization of the pmoA sequences, were performed with the package phyloseq v1.12.2 (75) from the open source software Bioconductor. We applied a read count threshold of ≥35,000 counts per sample. To account for differences in numbers of reads between samples, we used rarefied OTU counts to an even sampling depth. The resulting data set was used for all subsequent analyses. Phylogenetic beta diversity was calculated using the tree-based unique fraction (UniFrac) metric weighted by the abundances of individual OTUs (76). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) ordination of the distance metric was used to identify community grouping (77). To determine whether the observed between-group distances were statistically significant, we performed permutational multivariate analysis of variance of the distance metric by using the PERMANOVA+ package of the software PRIMER-E v7 (PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom).
Nucleotide sequence accession number(s).
Sequence reads of pmoA genes obtained from targeted amplicon sequencing and representative pmoA sequences of identified OTUs were deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under study number PRJEB20489.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to I. Erny, M. Folini, and other helpers during field trips. We acknowledge J. Walser, M. Kaestli, and C. Renaux for bioinformatics and statistical support and R. Henneberger for a critical reading of the manuscript. High-throughput amplicon sequencing and quantitative PCR analyses were performed at the Genetic Diversity Center, ETH Zurich. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions.
This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 200021-13772); additional financial support was provided by ETH Zurich.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01139-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dominati E, Patterson M, Mackay A. 2010. A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econ 69:1858–1868. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J-F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhan H. 2013. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, p 659–740. In Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (ed), Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hanson RS, Hanson TE. 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 60:439–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Qiu Q, Noll M, Abraham W-R, Lu Y, Conrad R. 2008. Applying stable isotope probing of phospholipid fatty acids and rRNA in a Chinese rice field to study activity and composition of the methanotrophic bacterial communities in situ. ISME J 2:602–614. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Graef C, Hestnes AG, Svenning MM, Frenzel P. 2011. The active methanotrophic community in a wetland from the High Arctic. Environ Microbiol Rep 3:466–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Henneberger R, Chiri E, Bodelier PEL, Frenzel P, Lüke C, Schroth MH. 2015. Field-scale tracking of active methane-oxidizing communities in a landfill cover soil reveals spatial and seasonal variability. Environ Microbiol 17:1721–1737. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bender M, Conrad R. 1992. Kinetics of CH4 oxidation in oxic soils exposed to ambient air or high CH4 mixing ratios. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 101:261–270. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dutaur L, Verchot LV. 2007. A global inventory of the soil CH4 sink. Global Biogeochem Cycles 21:1–9. doi: 10.1029/2006GB002734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dunfield PF. 2007. The soil methane sink, p 152–170. In Reay D, Hewitt K, Smith K, Grace J (ed), Greenhouse gas sinks. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bridgham SD, Cadillo-Quiroz H, Keller JK, Zhuang Q. 2013. Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob Chang Biol 19:1325–1346. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baani M, Liesack W. 2008. Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10203–10208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702643105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Knief C. 2015. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front Microbiol 6:1346. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Semrau JD, Chistoserdov A, Lebron J, Costello A, Davagnino J, Kenna E, Holmes AJ, Finch R, Murrell JC, Lidstrom ME. 1995. Particulate methane monooxygenase genes in methanotrophs. J Bacteriol 177:3071–3079. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.11.3071-3079.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Henckel T, Jäckel U, Schnell S, Conrad R. 2000. Molecular analyses of novel methanotrophic communities in forest soil that oxidize atmospheric methane. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1801–1808. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1801-1808.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Holmes AJ, Roslev P, McDonald IR, Iversen N, Henriksen K, Murrell JC. 1999. Characterization of methanotrophic bacterial populations in soils showing atmospheric methane uptake. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3312–3318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Knief C, Lipski A, Dunfield PF. 2003. Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6703–6714. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6703-6714.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Whalen SC, Reeburgh WS. 1990. Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soils. Nature 346:160–162. doi: 10.1038/346160a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Adamsen APS, King GM. 1993. Methane consumption in temperate and subarctic forest soils: rates, vertical zonation, and responses to water and nitrogen. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:485–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Born M, Dörr H, Levin I. 1990. Methane consumption in aerated soils of the temperate zone. Tellus B 42:2–8. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Livesley SJ, Grover S, Hutley LB, Jamali H, Butterbach-Bahl K, Fest B, Beringer J, Arndt SK. 2011. Seasonal variation and fire effects on CH4, N2O and CO2 exchange in savanna soils of northern Australia. Agric For Meteorol 151:1440–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hiller RV, Bretscher D, DelSontro T, Diem T, Eugster W, Henneberger R, Hobi S, Hodson E, Imer D, Kreuzer M, Künzle T, Merbold L, Niklaus PA, Rihm B, Schellenberger A, Schroth MH, Schubert CJ, Siegrist H, Stieger J, Buchmann N, Brunner D. 2014. Anthropogenic and natural methane fluxes in Switzerland synthesized within a spatially explicit inventory. Biogeosciences 11:1941–1959. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-1941-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.King GM, Nanba K. 2008. Distribution of atmospheric methane oxidation and methanotrophic communities on Hawaiian volcanic deposits and soils. Microbes Environ 23:326–330. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME08529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bárcena TG, Yde JC, Finster KW. 2010. Methane flux and high-affinity methanotrophic diversity along the chronosequence of a receding glacier in Greenland. Ann Glaciol 51:23–31. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hofmann K, Reitschuler C, Illmer P. 2013. Aerobic and anaerobic microbial activities in the foreland of a receding glacier. Soil Biol Biochem 57:418–426. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nauer PA, Dam B, Liesack W, Zeyer J, Schroth MH. 2012. Activity and diversity of methane-oxidizing bacteria in glacier forefields on siliceous and calcareous bedrock. Biogeosciences 9:2259–2274. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-2259-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Paul F, Frey H, Le Bris R. 2011. A new glacier inventory for the European Alps from Landsat TM scenes of 2003: challenges and results. Ann Glaciol 52:144–152. https://www.igsoc.org/annals/52/59/a59A054.html. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haeberli W, Paul F, Zemp M. 2013. Vanishing glaciers in the European Alps, p 1–9. In Haeberli W, Paul F, Zemp M (ed), Fate of mountain glaciers in the Anthropocene. Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, Vatican City, Vatican. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stevens P, Walker T. 1970. The chronosequence concept and soil formation. Q Rev Biol 45:333–350. doi: 10.1086/406646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nemergut DR, Anderson SP, Cleveland CC, Martin AP, Miller AE, Seimon A, Schmidt SK. 2007. Microbial community succession in an unvegetated, recently deglaciated soil. Microb Ecol 53:110–122. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9144-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sigler WV, Crivii S, Zeyer J. 2002. Bacterial succession in glacial forefield soils characterized by community structure, activity and opportunistic growth dynamics. Microb Ecol 44:306–316. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-2025-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lazzaro A, Abegg C, Zeyer J. 2009. Bacterial community structure of glacier forefields on siliceous and calcareous bedrock. Eur J Soil Sci 60:860–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01182.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two Alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–1934. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mavris C, Egli M, Plötze M, Blum JD, Mirabella A, Giaccai D, Haeberli W. 2010. Initial stages of weathering and soil formation in the Morteratsch proglacial area (Upper Engadine, Switzerland). Geoderma 155:359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gregory KJ, Goudie AS. 2011. The SAGE handbook of geomorphology. SAGE Publications, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sokratov SA. 2002. Intraseasonal variation in the thermoinsulation effect of snow cover on soil temperatures and energy balance. J Geophys Res 107:ACL 13-1–ACL 13-6. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bartlett MG. 2004. Snow and the ground temperature record of climate change. J Geophys Res 109:F04008. doi: 10.1029/2004JF000224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lipson DA, Schadt CW, Schmidt SK. 2002. Changes in soil microbial community structure and function in an alpine dry meadow following spring snow melt. Microb Ecol 43:307–314. doi: 10.1007/s00248-001-1057-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lazzaro A, Hilfiker D, Zeyer J. 2015. Structures of microbial communities in Alpine soils: seasonal and elevational effects. Front Microbiol 6:1330. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chiri E, Nauer PA, Henneberger R, Zeyer J, Schroth MH. 2015. Soil-methane sink increases with soil age in forefields of Alpine glaciers. Soil Biol Biochem 84:83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dumont MG, Lüke C, Deng Y, Frenzel P. 2014. Classification of pmoA amplicon pyrosequences using BLAST and the lowest common ancestor method in MEGAN. Front Microbiol 5:34. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Von Fischer JC, Butters G, Duchateau PC, Thelwell RJ, Siller R. 2009. In situ measures of methanotroph activity in upland soils: a reaction-diffusion model and field observation of water stress. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 114:1–12. doi: 10.1029/2008JG000731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Khare E, Arora NK. 2015. Effects of soil environment on field efficacy of microbial inoculants, p 381 In Arora NK. (ed), Plant microbes symbiosis: applied facets. Springer India, New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Or D, Tuller M. 2000. Flow in unsaturated fractured porous media: hydraulic conductivity of rough surfaces. Water Resour Res 36:1165–1177. doi: 10.1029/2000WR900020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bachmann J, van der Ploeg RR. 2002. A review on recent developments in soil water retention theory: interfacial tension and temperature effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:468. doi:. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tokunaga TK. 12 June 2009. Hydraulic properties of adsorbed water films in unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 45:W06415. doi: 10.1029/2009WR007734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lebeau M, Konrad J-M. 2010. A new capillary and thin film flow model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 46:12. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bear J, Cheng AH-D. 2010. Modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ebrahimi A, Or D. 2015. Hydration and diffusion processes shape microbial community organization and function in model soil aggregates. Water Resour Res 51:9804–9827. doi: 10.1002/2015WR017565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lazzaro A, Brankatschk R, Zeyer J. 2012. Seasonal dynamics of nutrients and bacterial communities in unvegetated Alpine glacier forefields. Appl Soil Ecol 53:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lazzaro A, Wismer A, Schneebeli M, Erny I, Zeyer J. 2015. Microbial abundance and community structure in a melting Alpine snowpack. Extremophiles 19:631–642. doi: 10.1007/s00792-015-0744-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Priemé A, Sitaula JIB, Klemedtsson ÅK, Bakken LR. 1996. Extraction of methane-oxidizing bacteria from soil particles. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 21:59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00333.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dunfield PF, Yimga MT, Dedysh SN, Berger U, Liesack W, Heyer J. 2002. Isolation of a Methylocystis strain containing a novel pmoA-like gene. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 41:17–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00962.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bouwman AF. 1999. Approaches to scaling of trace gas fluxes in ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nauer PA, Chiri E, Zeyer J, Schroth MH. 2014. Technical note: disturbance of soil structure can lead to release of entrapped methane in glacier forefield soils. Biogeosciences 11:613–620. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-613-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kanazawa S, Filip Z. 1986. Distribution of microorganisms, total biomass, and enzyme activities in different particles of brown soil. Microb Ecol 12:205–215. doi: 10.1007/BF02011205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Brussaard L, Kooistra MJ. 1993. Soil structure/soil biota interrelationships, 1st ed Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang G, Or D. 2012. A hydration-based biophysical index for the onset of soil microbial coexistence. Sci Rep 2:881. doi: 10.1038/srep00881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bárcena T, Finster K, Yde J. 2011. Spatial patterns of soil development, methane oxidation, and methanotrophic diversity along a receding glacier forefield, Southeast Greenland. Arct Antarct Alp Res 43:178–188. doi: 10.1657/1938-4246-43.2.178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bakermans C. 2015. Microbial evolution under extreme conditions. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zheng Y, Yang W, Sun X, Wang S-P, Rui Y-C, Luo C-Y, Guo L-D. 2012. Methanotrophic community structure and activity under warming and grazing of Alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:2193–2203. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3535-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nauer PA, Chiri E, Schroth MH. 2013. Poly-use multi-level sampling system for soil-gas transport analysis in the vadose zone. Environ Sci Technol 47:11122–11130. doi: 10.1021/es401958u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Livingston GPP, Hutchinson GLL. 1995. Enclosure-based measurement of trace gas exchange: applications and sources of error, p 14–51. In Matson PA, Harriss RC (ed), Biogenic trace gases: measuring emissions from soil and water. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nauer PA, Schroth MH. 2010. In situ quantification of atmospheric methane oxidation in near-surface soils. Vadose Zone J 9:1052–1062. doi: 10.2136/vzj2009.0192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dörr H, Münnich KO. 1990. 222Rn flux and soil air concentration profiles in West-Germany. Soil 222Rn as tracer for gas transport in the unsaturated soil zone. Tellus B 42:20–28. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schroth MH, Eugster W, Gómez KE, Gonzalez-Gil G, Niklaus PA, Oester P. 2012. Above- and below-ground methane fluxes and methanotrophic activity in a landfill-cover soil. Waste Manag 32:879–889. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Henneberger R, Lüke C, Mosberger L, Schroth MH. 2012. Structure and function of methanotrophic communities in a landfill-cover soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81:52–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bybee SM, Bracken-Grissom H, Haynes BD, Hermansen RA, Byers RL, Clement MJ, Udall JA, Wilcox ER, Crandall KA. 2011. Targeted amplicon sequencing (TAS): a scalable next-gen approach to multilocus, multitaxa phylogenetics. Genome Biol Evol 3:1312–1323. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2010. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27:221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Keane T, Creevey C, Pentony M, Naughton T, Mclnerney J. 2006. Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. BMC Evol Biol 6:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH. 2006. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9:683–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R. 2011. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J 5:169–172. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–8235. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd ed Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





