Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2017 Aug 31;8:564. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00564

Anti-fibrotic Potential of AT2 Receptor Agonists

Yan Wang 1, Mark Del Borgo 2, Huey W Lee 1, Dhaniel Baraldi 1, Baydaa Hirmiz 2, Tracey A Gaspari 1, Kate M Denton 3, Marie-Isabel Aguilar 2, Chrishan S Samuel 1, Robert E Widdop 1,*
PMCID: PMC5583590  PMID: 28912715

Abstract

There are a number of therapeutic targets to treat organ fibrosis that are under investigation in preclinical models. There is increasing evidence that stimulation of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) is a novel anti-fibrotic strategy and we have reviewed the published in vivo preclinical data relating to the effects of compound 21 (C21), which is the only nonpeptide AT2R agonist that is currently available for use in chronic preclinical studies. In particular, the differential influence of AT2R on extracellular matrix status in various preclinical fibrotic models is discussed. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that pharmacological AT2R stimulation using C21 decreases organ fibrosis, which has been most studied in the setting of cardiovascular and renal disease. In addition, AT2R-mediated anti-inflammatory effects may contribute to the beneficial AT2R-mediated anti-fibrotic effects seen in preclinical models.

Keywords: AT2 receptor, compound 21, cardiac fibrosis, renal fibrosis, inflammation

Introduction

The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is one of the most important systems to regulate hemodynamics, blood pressure, and tissue remodeling processes. The RAS is a circulating as well as a local hormonal system (Campbell, 1987) such that local generation of angiotensin occurs in many tissues including the brain, heart, kidney, and vasculature (Te Riet et al., 2015). Various components of circulating and tissue RAS that are important for regulating vascular and cardiac contractility, fluid and electrolyte homeostasis, as well as extracellular matrix (ECM) production have been reviewed elsewhere (Campbell, 1987; Te Riet et al., 2015).

There are two major subtypes of angiotensin receptors, the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor (AT1R) and angiotensin II subtype 2 receptor (AT2R) (Herichova and Szantoova, 2013; Karnik et al., 2015). It is well established that activation of AT1R by angiotensin II (Ang II) mediates pathophysiological effects such as vasoconstriction, proliferation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and inflammation (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993; Ferrario and Strawn, 2006; Whaley-Connell et al., 2013), which occurs in multiple organs including heart, kidney, liver, lungs, vascular smooth muscle, and brain (Mehta and Griendling, 2007; Karnik et al., 2015). On the other hand, activation of AT2R is thought to counter-regulate the pathophysiological effects induced by AT1R and exert vasodilator, anti-fibrotic, anti-proliferative, and anti-inflammatory effects (Widdop et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2008) as well as natriuretic and antihypertensive effects in renal disease (Carey, 2017). The AT2R is also very topical in the context of neuropathic pain as it has recently been reported that an old AT2R antagonist has been repurposed to treat neuropathic pain. For general interest, an historical account of this recent discovery is also noted (see Keppel Hesselink and Schatman, 2017). However, the current review will focus on recent evidence for an anti-fibrotic effect due to the pharmacological stimulation of AT2R in the context of cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally (Moran et al., 2014). While progress is being made in addressing CVD risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, and high cholesterol (Moran et al., 2014), less therapeutic intervention has been directed at some of the underlying pathological changes occurring in relevant organs. In particular, the ECM is now considered an important site for therapeutic intervention (Rockey et al., 2015).

In the heart, for example, hypertensive heart disease is characterized by myocardial ECM expansion due to excess collagen accumulation (Weber, 1989). Injurious stimuli such as myocardial inflammation, cardiac overload, or cardiomyocyte death may activate pro-fibrotic pathways. Several cell types are involved in this process directly by producing matrix proteins (fibroblasts) or indirectly by secreting fibrogenic mediators (macrophages, mast cells, lymphocytes, cardiomyocytes) that in turn promote fibroblast-mediated ECM production. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 is considered the main pro-fibrogenic mediator and promotes the transdifferentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts that contribute to myofibroblast-mediated collagen synthesis leading to excess collagen complex deposition in the ECM (Tomasek et al., 2002; Rockey et al., 2015). This is one of the key cellular events that drive cardiac fibrosis. The accumulation of collagen (scar tissue) replaces cardiomyocytes that leads to the loss of structural integrity of the myocardium (Weber, 1989; Weber et al., 2013). The distinction between reactive interstititial fibrosis and reparative fibrosis, as occurs following myocardial infraction (MI), is not always well defined (Schelbert et al., 2014). In any case, the consequences of ECM expansion such as increased myocardial collagen deposition in patients results in heart dysfunction (Anderson et al., 1993; Brilla et al., 2000; Diez et al., 2002; Weber et al., 2013; Schelbert et al., 2014). Indeed, it has been estimated that fibrotic diseases contributed to about 45% of mortality in Western countries and may be higher in developing countries (Rosenbloom et al., 2013).

Targeting RAS as Therapeutic Treatment for CVDs

Angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEi) are effective treatments for hypertension based on the concept of blocking the AngII–AT1R-axis mediated pathological effects (Karnik et al., 2015). Both treatments are effective in hypertensive patients and their antihypertensive effects appear equivalent (Vijan, 2009; Bavishi et al., 2016), although both ARBs and ACEi exhibit only limited capacity to improve cardiovascular outcome in hypertensive patients beyond blood pressure reductions (van Vark et al., 2012; Bavishi et al., 2016). By contrast, anti-fibrotic effects of ACEi and ARBs were clearly demonstrated in tissue biopsies in small well-controlled trials (Brilla et al., 2000; Diez et al., 2002; Querejeta et al., 2004), which were designed to measure cardiac ECM status (although this is clearly not possible in large outcome trials). Therefore, it was not surprising that many studies subsequently combined ACEi and ARBs (dual RAS inhibition) in the hope that this strategy would maximize any potential cardiovascular remodeling (such as fibrosis reduction) to improve clinical outcomes. However, the impact was in fact the opposite: there was an increased risk of adverse renal events such as hyperkalemia and acute renal failure together with symptomatic hypotension (Yusuf et al., 2008; Messerli et al., 2010; Makani et al., 2013). Indeed, dual RAS inhibition is now contraindicated in most cardiovascular guidelines. Clearly, novel treatments are needed that can exert anti-fibrotic effects alone or in combination with individual RAS inhibitors.

At2R Knock Out and Over-Expression Studies

Initially, there were conflicting reports on the anti-fibrotic effects of AT2R deletion on cardiac remodeling evoked by pressure overload, Ang II infusion, or myocardial infarction (MI) that were most likely due to the background mouse strains [see Widdop et al. (2003) for review]. Generally, there is strong evidence demonstrating the protective role of AT2R activation since AT2R knock out mice exhibited enhanced cardiac perivascular (Akishita et al., 2000), renal (Ma et al., 1998; Chow et al., 2014), and liver (Nabeshima et al., 2006) fibrosis following pro-fibrotic stimuli. Furthermore, cardiac overexpression of AT2R was protective against Ang II-induced fibrosis (Kurisu et al., 2003), cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats (Metcalfe et al., 2004), and during post-infarct remodeling (Yang et al., 2002; Bove et al., 2004; Isbell et al., 2007; Qi et al., 2012). While detrimental effects of cardiac AT2R overexpression have been reported (Nakayama et al., 2005), recent evidence suggests that there is an optimal AT2R transgene copy number required to protect against MI-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis (Xu et al., 2014).

Direct Pharmacological At2R Stimulation is Anti-Fibrotic

The development of the selective nonpeptide AT2R agonist compound 21 (C21) (Wan et al., 2004) provided another approach for the understanding of AT2R function. Compound 21 is highly AT2R-selective (Wan et al., 2004; Bosnyak et al., 2011) although some off target effects such as interference with cellular calcium transport have been reported (Verdonk et al., 2012), albeit at concentrations orders of magnitude greater than its AT2R binding affinity, as we have previously discussed (McCarthy et al., 2013). Therefore, C21 can generally be considered as a selective AT2R agonist and has been used in this context by many research groups. In a seminal study, Kaschina et al. (2008) reported that following 7 days of treatment with C21, the scarring associated with post-MI remodeling was reduced, which correlated with significantly improved cardiac function (Kaschina et al., 2008). In addition, Gelosa et al. (2009) reported that chronic treatment with C21 reduced kidney inflammation and fibrosis in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), although the main focus of this study was on stroke protection (Gelosa et al., 2009). Subsequently, there have been a handful of studies published that clearly show that AT2R stimulation using C21 exerts anti-fibrotic effects in hearts of SHRSP (Rehman et al., 2012), following chronic MI in rats (Lauer et al., 2014), in vasculature of rats treated with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME (Paulis et al., 2012), and in lungs during pulmonary hypertension (Bruce et al., 2015). While C21 is generally considered to be AT2R selective (Bosnyak et al., 2011), not all these studies used the AT2R antagonist to confirm an AT2R effect. In addition, renal anti-fibrotic effects of C21 have also been reported in kidneys insulted by doxorubicin (Hrenak et al., 2013) or different forms of diabetic nephropathy (Castoldi et al., 2014; Koulis et al., 2015). Details of all aforementioned studies are provided in Table 1. Collectively, these studies document a protective role of the C21–AT2R axis against organ fibrosis. Intriguingly, it was recently reported that the AT2R may form heterodimers with other class A G-protein-coupled receptors, such as relaxin family peptide receptor (RXFP1) to regulate fibrosis progression, as the anti-fibrotic effects of relaxin in the kidney were actually prevented by genetic or pharmacological inhibition of AT2Rs (Chow et al., 2014).

Table 1.

Summary of anti-fibrotic and related protective effects evoked by chronic treatment with C21.

CVD model Effect of AT2R stimulation by C21 Reference
Cardiac/vasculature effects
Myocardial infarction (MI) in Wistar rats: MI @ 7 days exhibited reduced cardiac function, scar formation, and peri-infarct apoptosis and inflammation C21 (0.03, 0.3 mg/kg/d IP) for 7 days post-MI: Improved MI-impaired cardiac function (echocardiography and cardiac catheterization); decreased scar (by MRI); Decreased inflammation (mRNA cytokines); and apoptosis (caspase 3, Fas ligand) in peri-infarct zone; C21 effects blocked by PD123319 Kaschina et al., 2008
Stroke-prone SHR (SP-SHR); 13 weeks old @ study end: Exhibited modest fibrosis and inflammation in heart and coronary and aortic vessels C21 (1 mg/kg/d in chow) for 6 weeks: Prevented vascular fibrosis (coronary and aorta) and stiffness (mesenteric); reduced vascular inflammation and oxidative stress (aorta); Decreased cardiac interstitial and perivascular myocardial collagen; unchanged cardiac MMP2/9; Reduced renal inflammatory/T cell infiltration Rehman et al., 2012
L-NAME-treated Wistar rat; 16 weeks old @ study end: Exhibited increased aortic wall thickness, stiffness, and fibrosis C21 (0.3 mg/kg/d PO) for 6 weeks with L-NAME: Partially prevented vascular wall stiffening and fibrosis and reduced pulse wave velocity Paulis et al., 2012
MI in Wistar rats: MI @ 6 weeks exhibited LV remodeling with increased collagen, TGF-β1, MMM2/9, and decreased TIMP1; associated with impaired function (by echo) C21 (0.03 mg/kg/d IP) for 6 weeks post-MI: Improved MI-impaired cardiac function (echocardiography); Reduced cardiac interstitial fibrosis and TGF-β1 in LV; Decreased MMP2/9; increased TIMP1 and MMP9/TIMP1 ratio Lauer et al., 2014
Pulmonary hypertension in Sprague Dawley rats; studied 4 weeks after monocrotaline (MCT): Exhibited increased RV pressure; lung fibrosis; RV fibrosis; and increased lung mRNA for TGF-β1, TNF-α, and IL-1β C21 (0.03 mg/kg/d IP) for 2 weeks; started 2 weeks after MCT: Improved MCT-impaired RV function; Reversed lung and RV fibrosis; Reversed pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines in lungs (mRNA); C21 effects blocked by PD123319 or MasR antagonist Bruce et al., 2015
Disease model Effect of AT2R activation Reference
Renal effects
SP-SHR (4 weeks old) fed high salt diet for ∼8 weeks: Exhibited early development of proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and renal fibrosis; later accompanied by brain lesions (by MRI) C21 (0.75, 5, and 10 mg/kg/d PO) for duration of high salt: Highest C21 dose was effective and delayed brain lesions and delayed proteinuria; Reduced glomerulosclerosis, renal fibrosis, and macrophage infiltration; decreased epithelium/mesenchymal differentiation Gelosa et al., 2009
Doxorubicin-induced renal toxicity in Wistar rats; studied 4 weeks later: Exhibited decreased glomerular density, increased renal oxidative stress C21 (0.3 mg/kg/d PO) for 4 weeks post-doxorubicin: Renal fibrosis unchanged; Reduced oxidative stress and restored glomerular density Hrenak et al., 2013
Zucker diabetic fatty rats; 20 weeks old @ study end: Exhibited diabetic nephropathy including glomerulosclerosis, albuminuria, and renal fibrosis C21 (0.3 mg/kg/d IP) for 15 weeks; Reduced renal glomerular, tubulointerstitial, and perivascular fibrosis; Reduced macrophage infiltration, but modest reduction in albuminuria (only for first 6 weeks of C21) Castoldi et al., 2014
Streptozotocin in ApoE-/- mice (5 weeks old); studied 20 weeks later: Exhibited diabetic nephropathy including glomerulosclerosis, albuminuria, increased pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines C21 (1 mg/kg/d PO) for 20 weeks post-STZ; Reduced glomerulosclerosis, mesangial expansion, albuminuria; inhibited many markers of oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis; increased MMP2/9 Koulis et al., 2015
Open in a new tab

Potential Anti-Fibrotic Mechanisms of At2R

A number of anti-fibrotic mechanisms are likely to be associated with the changes evoked by C21 (Table 1). The activation of the pro-inflammatory nuclear factor-κBα (NFκB) pathway is a central transcriptional effector of inflammatory signaling. Nuclear factor-κB activation triggers gene transcription of many inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and vascular adhesion molecules such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in fibrotic hearts (Torre-Amione et al., 1996; Francis et al., 1998; Plenz et al., 1998).

Rompe et al. (2010) were the first to show that C21 could exert a direct anti-inflammatory effect as C21 inhibited NFκB activation leading to reduced TNF-α-mediated IL-6 release from human dermal fibroblasts. The anti-fibrotic effect caused by C21 was consistently associated with reduced inflammatory responses and inflammatory cell infiltration in a variety of animal models/organs (Table 1) and in other studies not directly assessing fibrosis (Matavelli et al., 2011, 2015; Sampson et al., 2016). In particular, C21-mediated renal anti-inflammatory effects occurred within 4 days in hypertensive rats (Matavelli et al., 2011) and modestly protected against diabetic nephropathy in a short-term (4 week) model in rats (Matavelli et al., 2015) whereas C21 consistently evoked renal anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in a longer term model of diabetic nephropathy in rats (Castoldi et al., 2014) and mice (Koulis et al., 2015). Taken together, these studies suggest that C21 inhibits inflammatory responses during the development of fibrosis via activation of AT2R.

TGF-β1 is a major pro-fibrotic factor that plays a key role in the development of tissue fibrosis (Lijnen et al., 2000). TGF-β stimulates fibroblasts to differentiate into pro-secretory myofibroblasts that in turn enhance ECM protein synthesis (Desmouliere et al., 1993; Tomasek et al., 2002; Berk et al., 2007). At the same time, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade ECM proteins and this process is tightly controlled by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) (Weber et al., 2013). However, in an injured organ, TGF-β1 upregulates the expression of protease inhibitors such as plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 and TIMPs which contribute to ECM preservation (Schiller et al., 2004).

Given that macrophages are a source of TGF-β1, the inhibition of macrophage infiltration via AT2R activation could contribute to reduced TGF-β1 stimulation of fibrotic pathways. In addition, direct stimulation of AT2R is well known to increase nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels, particularly in the kidneys (Siragy and Carey, 1996, 1997) and vasculature (see Widdop et al., 2003), noting that decreased cGMP levels following AT2R stimulation have also been reported (Karnik et al., 2015). Importantly, in vivo treatment with C21 increased NO/cGMP levels in kidneys (Matavelli et al., 2011, 2015) in keeping with a predominant AT2R-cGMP stimulatory effect. Interestingly, cGMP was reported to inhibit TGF-β signaling (Gong et al., 2011), thereby providing another mechanism for AT2R stimulation to modify fibrosis production. Indeed, a number of the anti-fibrotic effects of C21 already described were associated with marked reductions in TGF-β1 in heart (Lauer et al., 2014), lung (Bruce et al., 2015), and kidney (Matavelli et al., 2011; Koulis et al., 2015), suggesting that the inhibition of the TGF-β1 cascade is a common mechanism of the anti-fibrotic effect caused by AT2R activation. As TGF-β1 acutely increased AT2R expression in skeletal muscle (Painemal et al., 2013), it is possible that a similar compensatory response to cardiovascular injury contributes to increased AT2R expression in CVD, although the role of such interactions on AT2R expression during chronic AT2R stimulation is not known.

In terms of collagen metabolism affecting ECM turnover, the effect of AT2R activation on collagen degradation and the regulation of the MMP/TIMP balance is likely to depend on the experimental conditions studied, such as whether the main driver for fibrosis is reparative (in the case of MI) or persistent reactive fibrosis (in the case of hypertensive heart disease). Associated with the anti-fibrotic effect of C21, MMP2/9 levels were either unchanged in SHRSP hearts (Rehman et al., 2012), increased in diabetic murine kidneys (Koulis et al., 2015), or decreased in MI-injured rat hearts (Lauer et al., 2014). These discrepant results are likely to reflect the different requirements of ECM in such models. For example, following MI, cardiac TGF-β1 and MMP levels were elevated whereas cardiac TIMP levels were reduced (Lauer et al., 2014). These somewhat opposing changes caused by MI itself, i.e., pro-fibrotic TGF-β1 activity together with increased proteolytic activity seen by raised MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio, reflects the need to repair and remodel the heart following MI. In this instance, C21 appears to protect the heart by reducing widespread collagen production (decreased TGF-β1) and attenuating volume expansion (decreased MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio). By contrast, the ability of C21 to reduce fibrosis in persistent reactive fibrotic models of CVD probably reflects both impaired collagen production (decreased TGF-β1 and collagen), as well as increased degradation due to raised MMP levels (Koulis et al., 2015), which is clearly different to abruptly developing MI-induced cardiac remodeling (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Potential mechanisms involved in the anti-fibrotic actions of AT2R stimulation based on the effects of C21 (inhibitory sites in red). AT2R stimulation consistently reduces inflammatory and pro-fibrotic factors such as TGF-β1 thereby inhibiting myofibroblast differentiation and ECM production. However, the effects of AT2R stimulation on ECM turnover may differ depending on the type of fibrosis/disease model studied. C21 inhibited the proteolytic left ventricular expansion associated with MI-induced injury (green arrows) whereas AT2R stimulation is more likely to inhibit ECM preservation (blue arrows) associated with persistent injury (e.g., hypertension), thus facilitating ECM degradation.

Conclusion and Future Directions

Collectively, these studies demonstrate that pharmacological AT2R stimulation evokes decreases in organ fibrosis, most studied in the heart and kidneys to date. The effects of C21 on cardiac ECM remodeling may differ depending on the preclinical fibrotic model studied (Figure 1), which is likely to reflect the prevailing circumstances in response to injury, i.e., replacement fibrosis following MI versus persistent reactive interstitial fibrosis seen in hypertensive heart disease. However, AT2R stimulation also usually involves an anti-inflammatory effect that may contribute to the beneficial AT2R-mediated anti-fibrotic effects. Most data related to chronic AT2R stimulation have been obtained using C21, although there are a number of other AT2R agonists beginning to emerge in the literature (Jones et al., 2011; Guimond et al., 2014; Del Borgo et al., 2015; Mahmood and Pulakat, 2015) that require rigourous in vivo testing in a similar manner to C21. Such studies will shed further light on the clinical potential of AT2R agonists in CVD.

Author Contributions

RW and CS conceived the review; YW wrote the first draft; MDB and DB provided literature searches and contributed to draft. YW, HL, BH, TG, and RW contributed and performed experiments in Figure 1. RW, CS, M-IA, and KD did major revisions to the draft manuscript and approved final submission.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Work from the authors’ laboratories was supported in part by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (GNT1045848, GNT1101552, and GNT1127792), and NHMRC Senior Research Fellowships to KD (GNT1041844) and CS (GNT1041766).

References

  1. Akishita M., Iwai M., Wu L., Zhang L., Ouchi Y., Dzau V. J., et al. (2000). Inhibitory effect of angiotensin II type 2 receptor on coronary arterial remodeling after aortic banding in mice. Circulation 102 1684–1689. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.14.1684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson K. P., Walker R., Urie P., Ershler P. R., Lux R. L., Karwandee S. V. (1993). Myocardial electrical propagation in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Clin. Invest. 92 122–140. 10.1172/JCI116540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bavishi C., Bangalore S., Messerli F. H. (2016). Renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors in hypertension: is there evidence for benefit independent of blood pressure reduction? Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 59 253–261. 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berk B. C., Fujiwara K., Lehoux S. (2007). ECM remodeling in hypertensive heart disease. J. Clin. Invest. 117 568–575. 10.1172/JCI31044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosnyak S., Jones E. S., Christopoulos A., Aguilar M. I., Thomas W. G., Widdop R. E. (2011). Relative affinity of angiotensin peptides and novel ligands at AT1 and AT2 receptors. Clin. Sci. 121 297–303. 10.1042/CS20110036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bove C. M., Yang Z., Gilson W. D., Epstein F. H., French B. A., Berr S. S., et al. (2004). Nitric oxide mediates benefits of angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression during post-infarct remodeling. Hypertension 43 680–685. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000115924.94236.91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brilla C. G., Funck R. C., Rupp H. (2000). Lisinopril-mediated regression of myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertensive heart disease. Circulation 102 1388–1393. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.12.1388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruce E., Shenoy V., Rathinasabapathy A., Espejo A., Horowitz A., Oswalt A., et al. (2015). Selective activation of angiotensin AT2 receptors attenuates progression of pulmonary hypertension and inhibits cardiopulmonary fibrosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 172 2219–2231. 10.1111/bph.13044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell D. J. (1987). Circulating and tissue angiotensin systems. J. Clin. Invest. 79 1–6. 10.1172/JCI112768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carey R. M. (2017). Update on angiotensin AT2 receptors. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens 26 91–96. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Castoldi G., di Gioia C. R., Bombardi C., Maestroni S., Carletti R., Steckelings U. M., et al. (2014). Prevention of diabetic nephropathy by compound 21, selective agonist of angiotensin type 2 receptors, in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 307 F1123–F1131. 10.1152/ajprenal.00247.2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chow B. S., Kocan M., Bosnyak S., Sarwar M., Wigg B., Jones E. S., et al. (2014). Relaxin requires the angiotensin II type 2 receptor to abrogate renal interstitial fibrosis. Kidney Int. 86 75–85. 10.1038/ki.2013.518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Del Borgo M. P., Wang Y., Bosnyak S., Khan M., Walters P., Spizzo I., et al. (2015). β-Pro7Ang III is a novel highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) agonist, which acts as a vasodepressor agent via the AT2R in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin. Sci. 129 505–513. 10.1042/CS20150077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Desmouliere A., Geinoz A., Gabbiani F., Gabbiani G. (1993). Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 122 103–111. 10.1083/jcb.122.1.103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Diez J., Querejeta R., Lopez B., Gonzalez A., Larman M., Martinez Ubago J. L. (2002). Losartan-dependent regression of myocardial fibrosis is associated with reduction of left ventricular chamber stiffness in hypertensive patients. Circulation 105 2512–2517. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000017264.66561.3D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferrario C. M., Strawn W. B. (2006). Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and proinflammatory mediators in cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 98 121–128. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Francis S. E., Holden H., Holt C. M., Duff G. W. (1998). Interleukin-1 in myocardium and coronary arteries of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 30 215–223. 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gelosa P., Pignieri A., Fandriks L., de Gasparo M., Hallberg A., Banfi C., et al. (2009). Stimulation of AT2 receptor exerts beneficial effects in stroke-prone rats: focus on renal damage. J. Hypertens. 27 2444–2451. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283311ba1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gong K., Xing D., Li P., Hilgers R. H., Hage F. G., Oparil S., et al. (2011). cGMP inhibits TGF-beta signaling by sequestering Smad3 with cytosolic beta2-tubulin in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 25 1794–1803. 10.1210/me.2011-1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guimond M. O., Hallberg M., Gallo-Payet N., Wallinder C. (2014). Saralasin and sarile are AT2 receptor agonists. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 5 1129–1132. 10.1021/ml500278g [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herichova I., Szantoova K. (2013). Renin-angiotensin system: upgrade of recent knowledge and perspectives. Endocr. Regul. 47 39–52. 10.4149/endo_2013_01_39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hrenak J., Arendasova K., Rajkovicova R., Aziriova S., Repova K., Krajcirovicova K., et al. (2013). Protective effect of captopril, olmesartan, melatonin and compound 21 on doxorubicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Physiol. Res. 62(Suppl. 1), S181–S189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Isbell D. C., Voros S., Yang Z., DiMaria J. M., Berr S. S., French B. A., et al. (2007). Interaction between bradykinin subtype 2 and angiotensin II type 2 receptors during post-MI left ventricular remodeling. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293 H3372–H3378. 10.1152/ajpheart.00997.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones E. S., Del Borgo M. P., Kirsch J. F., Clayton D., Bosnyak S., Welungoda I., et al. (2011). A single β-amino acid substitution to angiotensin II confers AT2 receptor selectivity and vascular function. Hypertension 57 570–576. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.164301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones E. S., Vinh A., McCarthy C. A., Gaspari T. A., Widdop R. E. (2008). AT2 receptors: functional relevance in cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 120 292–316. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Karnik S. S., Unal H., Kemp J. R., Tirupula K. C., Eguchi S., Vanderheyden P. M., et al. (2015). International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. XCIX. Angiotensin receptors: interpreters of pathophysiological angiotensinergic stimuli [corrected]. Pharmacol. Rev. 67 754–819. 10.1124/pr.114.010454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaschina E., Grzesiak A., Li J., Foryst-Ludwig A., Timm M., Rompe F., et al. (2008). Angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation: a novel option of therapeutic interference with the renin-angiotensin system in myocardial infarction? Circulation 118 2523–2532. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.784868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Keppel Hesselink J. M., Schatman M. E. (2017). EMA401: an old antagonist of the AT2R for a new indication in neuropathic pain. J. Pain Res. 10 439–443. 10.2147/JPR.S128520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Koulis C., Chow B. S., McKelvey M., Steckelings U. M., Unger T., Thallas-Bonke V., et al. (2015). AT2R agonist, compound 21, is reno-protective against type 1 diabetic nephropathy. Hypertension 65 1073–1081. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kurisu S., Ozono R., Oshima T., Kambe M., Ishida T., Sugino H., et al. (2003). Cardiac angiotensin II type 2 receptor activates the kinin/NO system and inhibits fibrosis. Hypertension 41 99–107. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000050101.90932.14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lauer D., Slavic S., Sommerfeld M., Thone-Reineke C., Sharkovska Y., Hallberg A., et al. (2014). Angiotensin type 2 receptor stimulation ameliorates left ventricular fibrosis and dysfunction via regulation of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1/matrix metalloproteinase 9 axis and transforming growth factor beta1 in the rat heart. Hypertension 63 e60–e67. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lijnen P. J., Petrov V. V., Fagard R. H. (2000). Induction of cardiac fibrosis by transforming growth factor-beta(1). Mol. Genet. Metab. 71 418–435. 10.1006/mgme.2000.3032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ma J., Nishimura H., Fogo A., Kon V., Inagami T., Ichikawa I. (1998). Accelerated fibrosis and collagen deposition develop in the renal interstitium of angiotensin type 2 receptor null mutant mice during ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int. 53 937–944. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.1998.00893.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mahmood A., Pulakat L. (2015). Differential effects of β-blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers and a novel AT2R agonist NP-6A4 on stress response of nutrient-starved cardiovascular cells. PLoS ONE 10:e0144824 10.1371/journal.pone.0144824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Makani H., Bangalore S., Desouza K. A., Shah A., Messerli F. H. (2013). Efficacy and safety of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 346:f360 10.1136/bmj.f360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Matavelli L. C., Huang J., Siragy H. M. (2011). Angiotensin AT(2) receptor stimulation inhibits early renal inflammation in renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 57 308–313. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.164202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Matavelli L. C., Zatz R., Siragy H. M. (2015). A nonpeptide angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist prevents renal inflammation in early diabetes. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 65 371–376. 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McCarthy C. A., Widdop R. E., Denton K. M., Jones E. S. (2013). Update on the angiotensin AT2 receptor. Curr. Hypertens Rep. 15 25–30. 10.1007/s11906-012-0321-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mehta P. K., Griendling K. K. (2007). Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 292 C82–C97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Messerli F. H., Staessen J. A., Zannad F. (2010). Of fads, fashion, surrogate endpoints and dual RAS blockade. Eur. Heart J. 31 2205–2208. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Metcalfe B. L., Huentelman M. J., Parilak L. D., Taylor D. G., Katovich M. J., Knot H. J., et al. (2004). Prevention of cardiac hypertrophy by angiotensin II type-2 receptor gene transfer. Hypertension 43 1233–1238. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000127563.14064.fd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Moran A. E., Roth G. A., Narula J., Mensah G. A. (2014). 1990-2010 global cardiovascular disease atlas. Glob. Heart 9 3–16. 10.1016/j.gheart.2014.03.1220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nabeshima Y., Tazuma S., Kanno K., Hyogo H., Iwai M., Horiuchi M., et al. (2006). Anti-fibrogenic function of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 346 658–664. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nakayama M., Yan X., Price R. L., Borg T. K., Ito K., Sanbe A., et al. (2005). Chronic ventricular myocyte-specific overexpression of angiotensin II type 2 receptor results in intrinsic myocyte contractile dysfunction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288 H317–H327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Painemal P., Acuña M. J., Riquelme C., Brandan E., Cabello-Verrugio C. (2013). Transforming growth factor type beta 1 increases the expression of angiotensin II receptor type 2 by a SMAD- and p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism in skeletal muscle. Biofactors 39 467–475. 10.1002/biof.1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Paulis L., Becker S. T., Lucht K., Schwengel K., Slavic S., Kaschina E., et al. (2012). Direct angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation in Nomega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester-induced hypertension: the effect on pulse wave velocity and aortic remodeling. Hypertension 59 485–492. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.185496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Plenz G., Song Z. F., Reichenberg S., Tjan T. D., Robenek H., Deng M. C. (1998). Left-ventricular expression of interleukin-6 messenger-RNA higher in idiopathic dilated than in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 46 213–216. 10.1055/s-2007-1010227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Qi Y., Li H., Shenoy V., Li Q., Wong F., Zhang L., et al. (2012). Moderate cardiac-selective overexpression of angiotensin II type 2 receptor protects cardiac functions from ischaemic injury. Exp. Physiol. 97 89–101. 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.060673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Querejeta R., Lopez B., Gonzalez A., Sanchez E., Larman M., Martinez Ubago J. L., et al. (2004). Increased collagen type I synthesis in patients with heart failure of hypertensive origin: relation to myocardial fibrosis. Circulation 110 1263–1268. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140973.60992.9A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rehman A., Leibowitz A., Yamamoto N., Rautureau Y., Paradis P., Schiffrin E. L. (2012). Angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist compound 21 reduces vascular injury and myocardial fibrosis in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 59 291–299. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.180158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rockey D. C., Bell P. D., Hill J. A. (2015). Fibrosis–A common pathway to organ injury and failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 372 1138–1149. 10.1056/NEJMra1300575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rompe F., Artuc M., Hallberg A., Alterman M., Stroder K., Thone-Reineke C., et al. (2010). Direct angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation acts anti-inflammatory through epoxyeicosatrienoic acid and inhibition of nuclear factor kappaB. Hypertension 55 924–931. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosenbloom J., Mendoza F. A., Jimenez S. A. (2013). Strategies for anti-fibrotic therapies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832 1088–1103. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sadoshima J., Izumo S. (1993). Molecular characterization of angiotensin II–induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes and hyperplasia of cardiac fibroblasts. Critical role of the AT1 receptor subtype. Circ. Res. 73 413–423. 10.1161/01.RES.73.3.413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sampson A. K., Irvine J. C., Shihata W. A., Dragoljevic D., Lumsden N., Huet O., et al. (2016). Compound 21, a selective agonist of angiotensin AT2 receptors, prevents endothelial inflammation and leukocyte adhesion in vitro and in vivo. Br. J. Pharmacol. 173 729–740. 10.1111/bph.13063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schelbert E. B., Fonarow G. C., Bonow R. O., Butler J., Gheorghiade M. (2014). Therapeutic targets in heart failure: refocusing on the myocardial interstitium. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63 2188–2198. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schiller M., Javelaud D., Mauviel A. (2004). TGF-beta-induced SMAD signaling and gene regulation: consequences for extracellular matrix remodeling and wound healing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 35 83–92. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2003.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Siragy H. M., Carey R. M. (1996). The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate and AT1 receptor-mediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats. J. Clin. Invest. 97 1978–1982. 10.1172/JCI118630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Siragy H. M., Carey R. M. (1997). The subtype 2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor mediates renal production of nitric oxide in conscious rats. J. Clin. Invest. 100 264–269. 10.1172/JCI119531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Te Riet L., van Esch J. H., Roks A. J., van den Meiracker A. H., Danser A. H. (2015). Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations. Circ. Res. 116 960–975. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tomasek J. J., Gabbiani G., Hinz B., Chaponnier C., Brown R. A. (2002). Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3 349–363. 10.1038/nrm809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Torre-Amione G., Kapadia S., Lee J., Durand J. B., Bies R. D., Young J. B., et al. (1996). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and tumor necrosis factor receptors in the failing human heart. Circulation 93 704–711. 10.1161/01.CIR.93.4.704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. van Vark L. C., Bertrand M., Akkerhuis K. M., Brugts J. J., Fox K., Mourad J. J., et al. (2012). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors involving 158,998 patients. Eur. Heart J. 33 2088–2097. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Verdonk K., Durik M., Abd-Alla N., Batenburg W. W., van den Bogaerdt A. J., van Veghel R., et al. (2012). Compound 21 induces vasorelaxation via an endothelium- and angiotensin II type 2 receptor-independent mechanism. Hypertension 60 722–729. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.196022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Vijan S. G. (2009). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), not angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are preferred and effective mode of therapy in high cardiovascular risk patients. J. Indian Med. Assoc. 107 178–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wan Y., Wallinder C., Plouffe B., Beaudry H., Mahalingam A. K., Wu X., et al. (2004). Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of the first selective nonpeptide AT2 receptor agonist. J. Med. Chem. 47 5995–6008. 10.1021/jm049715t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Weber K. T. (1989). Cardiac interstitium in health and disease: the fibrillar collagen network. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 13 1637–1652. 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90360-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Weber K. T., Sun Y., Bhattacharya S. K., Ahokas R. A., Gerling I. C. (2013). Myofibroblast-mediated mechanisms of pathological remodelling of the heart. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10 15–26. 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Whaley-Connell A., Habibi J., Rehmer N., Ardhanari S., Hayden M. R., Pulakat L., et al. (2013). Renin Inhibition and AT1R blockade improve metabolic signaling, oxidant stress and myocardial tissue remodeling. Metab. Clin. Exp. 62 861–872. 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.12.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Widdop R. E., Jones E. S., Hannan R. E., Gaspari T. A. (2003). Angiotensin AT2 receptors: cardiovascular hope or hype? Br. J. Pharmacol. 140 809–824. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu J., Sun Y., Carretero O. A., Zhu L., Harding P., Shesely E. G., et al. (2014). Effects of cardiac overexpression of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor on remodeling and dysfunction in mice post-myocardial infarction. Hypertension 63 1251–1259. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang Z., Bove C. M., French B. A., Epstein F. H., Berr S. S., DiMaria J. M., et al. (2002). Angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression preserves left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation 106 106–111. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000020014.14176.6D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yusuf S., Teo K. K., Pogue J., Dyal L., Copland I., Schumacher H., et al. (2008). Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 358 1547–1559. 10.1056/NEJMoa0801317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES