Chronic dialysis, NAT2 polymorphisms, and the risk of isoniazid-induced encephalopathy – case report and literature review

Abstract

Background

Isoniazid is the most widely used anti-tuberculosis agent, yet it may lead to life-threatening complications.

Case presentation

Here we report the case of a chronic hemodialysis patient who developed severe encephalopathy after the start of isoniazid. Blood levels of isoniazid were elevated, and acetyl-isoniazid over isoniazid ratio was decreased 3 h after intake of the medication, suggesting that a slow acetylator phenotype may have contributed to drug toxicity, in addition to pyridoxal phosphate removal by dialysis. This hypothesis was confirmed by sequencing of NAT2, the gene responsible for isoniazid elimination, and identification of NAT2 polymorphisms compatible with a slow acetylator phenotype. Isoniazid withdrawal along with supplementation using high doses of pyridoxine successfully reversed the drug toxicity. Isoniazid toxicity occurs in populations at risk, including patients with chronic kidney failure or NAT2 polymorphisms, who have a disturbed metabolism of pyridoxine or isoniazid, respectively, and those on renal replacement therapies, in whom pyridoxal phosphate – the active metabolite of pyridoxine – is inadvertently removed by dialysis.

Conclusions

Physicians should be aware of the increased risk of isoniazid toxicity in patients on dialysis and in those with a slow acetylator phenotype conferred by NAT2 polymorphisms. Adaptation of prescription – either with higher doses of pyridoxine or decreased doses of isoniazid, respectively – has been suggested to reduce the risk of potentially life-threatening toxicity of isoniazid.

Background

Despite recent advances and the fact that nearly all cases can be cured, tuberculosis remains one of the world’s biggest threats. In 2014, 9.6 million people developed tuberculosis and 1.5 million died from the disease [1]. Isoniazid is one of the oldest but also the most widely used anti-tuberculosis agent; it is easily administered, inexpensive, and exerts a high bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

However, isoniazid may lead to serious adverse events, including hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy and encephalopathy, especially in populations at risk [2]. The following case illustrates the impact of end-stage renal disease and NAT2 polymorphisms on the risk of isoniazid toxicity, and discusses how these life-threatening complications may be prevented and managed.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old African woman on chronic dialysis was referred to our institution because of unexplained lethargy and altered state of consciousness. Hemodialysis – using high-efficiency/high-flux membranes - had been initiated 5 years earlier because of end-stage nephrosclerosis. No significant complication occurred since the onset of dialysis. Her neurological status was normal until 6 weeks before her transfer, when she developed confusion and, over a few days, unresponsiveness. An extensive workup had been performed at another university hospital and found no evidence for a metabolic or vascular etiology, nor meningo-encephalitis; the electroencephalogram showed severe generalized abnormalities in keeping with a diagnosis of encephalopathy. The patient was transferred to our hospital for further investigation, upon request of the family.

At admission, blood pressure was 120/70 mmHg and heart rate regular at 86 bpm. She was somnolent, opened her eyes to verbal stimuli, uttered only sounds and had an avoiding response to pain. She scored 9/15 on the Glasgow coma scale. Two months before her transfer, she had undergone a workup for a chronic dry cough, including chest computed tomography-scan, positron emission tomography, bronchoalveolar lavage and interferon-gamma release assay. The results suggested latent tuberculosis infection, and the patient was prescribed isoniazid 300 mg o.d. along with weekly pyridoxine 250 mg. Altered mental status with somnolence then unresponsiveness developed two weeks after the start of isoniazid. Three hours after intake of isoniazid, blood level of the drug was 2.89 mg/l (normal range 1–2 mg/l), and the ratio of inactive acetyl-isoniazid to isoniazid was 0.33, a result compatible with a slow acetylator phenotype (<0.48, slow acetylators; >0.77, fast acetylators) [3]. Slow acetylator phenotype was confirmed by sequencing of NAT2 – the gene encoding the human isoenzyme arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) (NM_000015.2) – which showed a heterozygous status for the variants c.282C > T(rs1041983), c.341 T > C(rs1801280), c.481C > T(rs1799929), c.590G > A(rs1799930) and c.803G > A(rs1208), compatible with a NAT2*5B/*6A genotype (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Structure of the NAT2 gene and polymorphisms identified in our patient. The relative position of Exon 1, as well as the first (+1) and last (+873) positions of the open reading frame of Exon 2 are indicated. Vertical dotted lines show the positions of the single nucleotide polymorphisms identified in our patient. Haplotypes arising from the combinations of SNPs are shown in the table, with their associated acetylation activity

Isoniazid was discontinued soon after admission in our unit, and the patient was given high doses of oral pyridoxine (250 mg daily, equivalent to 1750 mg weekly). A remarkable improvement of the patient’s condition ensued, and Glasgow coma scale was 15/15 ten days later. She was discharged two weeks after admission and was prescribed physical therapy at home, in addition to continuing maintenance hemodialysis. Three months after discharge she had returned to her previous condition, being again able to have a full conversation and walk on her own. The life-threatening complication of isoniazid therapy, along with the debatable indication of treatment, prompted watchful waiting rather than reintroduction of any anti-tubercular treatment. Clinical follow-up was excellent, and a computed tomography of the chest performed one year later did not show any sign suggestive of tuberculosis infection.

Discussion

The present case illustrates the risk of potentially life-threatening toxic side effects of isoniazid in patients at risk, including end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis and/or those harboring a slow acetylator phenotype conferred by NAT2 polymorphisms.

More than 2 million people worldwide have end-stage renal disease and require dialysis as a life-saving therapy [4]. In the dialysis population, Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has a high prevalence, ranging between 5 and 25%, and isoniazid is frequently used to prevent reactivation [5]. Latent tuberculosis is frequently diagnosed in renal transplant candidates, who all should be screened during pre-transplantation evaluation, as the risk of active tuberculosis in transplant recipients is estimated to be 20–74 times higher than in the general population [6]. Patients on dialysis are at risk for isoniazid toxicity, because of altered pyridoxine metabolism resulting in severe deficiency in pyridoxal phosphate (the active form of pyridoxine), and extensive removal of pyridoxal phosphate (a small molecule of 247 Da) by renal replacement therapies [7]. While the recommended dose of pyridoxine supplementation in case of isoniazid treatment is usually 10–25 mg per day, [8] it needs to be increased to >100 mg/day to prevent drug toxicity among patients on dialysis [7]. Patients on high-flux high-efficiency hemodialysis – as our patient – are particularly at risk of pyridoxal phosphate depletion because of higher clearances during dialysis sessions [9].

Isoniazid is primarily metabolized by the polymorphic arylamine NAT2. NAT2 activity is genetically determined and basically relies on the number of active alleles in NAT2 gene (NAT2*4 and *12), thereby providing a molecular mechanism for the large inter-individual variability in toxicity and efficacy of isoniazid [10]. Individuals are therefore classified as rapid metabolizers if they have one or more NAT2*4 alleles, and slow metabolizers only if they carry two slow metabolizer variants, as our patient (Fig. 1). During treatment with the standard regimen, slow acetylators carry a higher risk of drug toxicity, while rapid acetylators are prone to treatment failure, due to insufficient exposure to isoniazid. As a result, it has been suggested that NAT2 genotype may help determining the dose of isoniazid in individual patients [11]. The appropriateness of such a pharmacogenetics-based has been recently validated in a large randomized controlled trial. NAT2 genotype-guided regimen significantly reduced the risk of both toxicity and treatment failure, in slow and rapid acetylators, respectively [12]. In our patient, the combination of increased isoniazid and decreased acetyl-ionazid levels pointed towards a slow acetylator phenotype, an hypothesis that was further verified by the identification of NAT2*5B/*6A genotype. Intriguingly, Sub-Saharan populations show a high prevalence (>70%) of slow acetylator phenotype related to NAT2 polymorphisms, possibly as a consequence of selective pressure related to the chemical environment, climate, biome, and dietary habits [13].

Conclusions

In conclusion, the combination of end-stage renal disease, removal of pyridoxal phosphate by hemodialysis, and deleterious NAT2 polymorphisms, contributed to the severe toxicity of isoniazid in our patient. Drug withdrawal and administration of high doses of pyridoxine rapidly reversed drug toxicity. Physicians should be aware of the increased risk of isoniazid toxicity in patients on dialysis and in those with a slow acetylator phenotype conferred by NAT2 polymorphisms. Adaptation of prescription – either with higher doses of pyridoxine or decreased doses of isoniazid, respectively – has been suggested to effectively reduce the risk of potentially life-threatening toxicity of isoniazid, while avoiding treatment failure. Future studies will need to validate NAT2 genotype-guided drug dosage of isoniazid as a safe and appropriate alternative to standard dose regimen.

Abbreviation

NAT-2

N-acetyltransferase 2

Authors’ contributions

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. SMC, BB, MJ and JM took clinical care of the patient. VH and FB performed genetic sequencing and interpreted findings of genetic analyses. SMC and JM wrote a draft of the manuscript that was reviewed and approved by all authors.

Consent for publication

The patient provided written informed consent to its publication.

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.