Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 Jul 18;491(3):773–779. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.07.100

Discovery of small molecule inhibitors for the C. elegans caspase CED-3 by high-throughput screening

Scott J Brantley a,1, Steven W Cotten a,1, David R Lamson b, Ginger R Smith b, Rihe Liu a,c,*, Kevin P Williams b,d,*
PMCID: PMC5590106  NIHMSID: NIHMS896163  PMID: 28733033

Abstract

C. elegans has been widely used as a model organism for programmed cell death and apoptosis. Although the CED-3 caspase is the primary effector of cell death in C. elegans, no selective inhibitors have been identified. Utilizing high-throughput screening with recombinant C. elegans CED-3 protein, we have discovered and confirmed 21 novel small molecule inhibitors. Six compounds had IC50 values < 10 μM. From these, four distinct chemotypes were identified. The inhibitor scaffolds described here could lead to the development of selective molecular probes to facilitate our understanding of programmed cell death in this model organism.

Keywords: C. elegans, caspase, CED-3, high-throughput screening, small molecule inhibitor, apoptosis

1. Introduction

Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death necessary for development and cellular homeostasis [1]. The most downstream elements of this highly regulated and conserved process are a class of cysteinyl aspartate proteinases called caspases. [2]. The first caspase family member to be associated with apoptosis was the cell death protein CED-3 of C. elegans [3]. Since the cloning of ced-3 in 1993, a number of caspases have been identified from various mammalian and non-mammalian species, including those from human, mouse, zebrafish, Drosophila melanogaster, and C. elegans [4]. It appears that the number of caspases in C. elegans is significantly less than that in mammals. Only four caspase-like genes have been identified in C. elegans, including ced-3, csp-1, csp-2, and csp-3 [5]. Among these four caspases, CED-3 is expressed in most cells throughout C. elegans development and is the only caspase that has been shown to be required for apoptosis in C. elegans. CED-3 is highly homologous to mammalian caspase-3 [3].

The simplicity of the caspase family in C. elegans makes it an ideal model organism to study apoptosis and cell death mechanisms [6]. In C.elegans, cell death is modulated by anti-apoptotic CED-9, caspase activator CED-4 and the executioner caspase CED-3 [7], with activation of CED-3 being the final step triggering apoptosis [8]. The onset of programmed cell death in C. elegans relies on a delicate interaction between CED-3, CED-4, CED-9, and EGL-1. In addition, CSP-3 has been identified as a negative regulator of CED-3 [9]. CED-3 has also been shown to cleave the Dicer RNase to generate a fragment possessing DNAse activity which promotes apoptosis through chromosome fragmentation [10].

Structurally, CED-3 is a CARD-containing caspase that appears to serve both as an initiator and effector caspase. CED-3 is expressed as an inactive form that undergoes autocatalytic processing to remove the pro-domain and generate two active subunits of 10 kDa and 20 kDa, respectively [11, 12]. The resulting large and small subunits form a heterodimer with an active site comprised of residues from both subunits. Two heterodimers then align to form the active tetrameric caspase with two catalytic centers. Like other caspases, CED-3 possesses a catalytic cysteine residue embedded within a highly conserved QACRG pentapeptide motif. This cysteine serves as a nucleophile to first form a covalent thioacyl intermediate between the caspase and substrate, followed by hydrolysis of the amide bond catalyzed by the imidazole ring of a conserved histidine residue [13]. Detailed analyses of CED-3 reveal that its physiological function is to cleave vital substrates such as CED-9 in the cell to induce cell death. As a highly specific protease, CED-3 recognizes a tetrapeptide motif and cleaves its substrates carboxyl to an aspartate residue [12, 14]. Using combinatorial peptide libraries as the substrates, the optimal tetrapeptide substrate for CED-3 was found to be DEXD, similar to that of mammalian caspase-3 and -7 [12].

The conserved cleavage motif (DEVD) for caspase 3 enzymes has allowed the development of fluorogenic based assays [15, 16] to identify inhibitors. For example, human caspase-3 (HCASP3) has been associated with neurodegenerative disease [17] and inhibitors to this target have been identified (reviewed in [18]). Peptides and peptidomimetic compounds based on the recognition motif are potent caspase inhibitors but their use has been limited because of their poor bioavailability [19]. RNA aptamers targeting CED-9 have been shown to promote cell killing via a CED-3-dependent mechanism [20]. Carcinogenic benzenoid compounds have been shown to act as inhibitors of apoptosis in C.elegans [21], with some reports of direct binding to CED-3 [22]. Selective small molecule inhibitors of CED-3 that may serve as molecular probes [23, 24] to further elucidate the apoptotic cascade in C.elegans have not been reported.

In this study, we describe the high-throughput screening of CED-3 with a 28,800-compound library of small molecules and the identification of several potent inhibitors with a subset having selectivity over the closely related HCASP3.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Reagents

Human Caspase 3 (HCASP3) (catalog # 1083-5) was purchased from Biovision Inc. (Mountain View, CA). Fluorogenic substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC and caspase-3 inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO were purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Costar 384-well, flat-bottom, black plates were from Corning Incorporated (Corning, NY).

2.2 Recombinant C. elegans CED-3 expression and purification

C. elegans CED3 full-length cDNA was cloned into the pET-3a FLAG vector and transformed into E.coli B21 cells. Cells were grown at 37 °C in LB media and when in log phase CED3 expression was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM IPTG for 3 h. Cells were harvested, lysed and the resulting supernatant cleared by centrifugation to obtain lysate (termed CED-3L). FLAG-CED-3 was purified from bacterial cell lysate by capture on anti-FLAG antibody agarose resin (Sigma) followed by elution using free FLAG peptide (Sigma). The purity of soluble recombinant FLAG-CED-3 was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (data not shown). The proteolytic activities of CED-3L and purified CED-3 were characterized by using the CED-3 assay.

2.3 CED-3 assay

The enzymatic activity of CED-3 was measured by following cleavage of the fluorogenic substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC at room temperature. The assay buffer contained CED-3 (1 μL CED-3L lysate or 0.5 nM purified CED-3), 50 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% CHAPS, 10 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 10 mM DTT. Reactions were initiated by adding 20 μM Ac-DEVD-AMC substrate and reading the increase in fluorescence over time using the Ex360/Em460 filter set on a Pherastar Plus microplate reader (BMG LABTECH Inc., Cary, NC). The same conditions were used for the assay for HCASP3.

2.4 Chemical libraries and compound handling

A small molecule library of 28,800 compounds was purchased from Asinex Corp (Moscow, Russia). All compounds adhere to Lipinski’s rule of 5 [25], were registered in ActivityBase (IDBS Inc., Guildford UK) and could be identified in bar-coded 384-well plates with associated SD file data. Compounds were stored at −20°C in 100% DMSO.

2.5 High-throughput screening of CED-3

A high-throughput screen for small molecule inhibitors of CED-3 activity was adapted from the fluorogenic CED-3 assay described above. All steps were carried out at room temperature. Compounds (1 mM in DMSO) were spotted (0.5 μL) into columns 3–22 of dry Costar black flat bottom 384-well assay plates using a Biomek® NX (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA). Columns 1, 2, 23, and 24 were spotted with 0.5 μL of DMSO for use as controls. For primary screening, CED-3L (25 μL) was added to the plates using a 384-well Multidrop liquid dispenser (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and after a 15 min incubation with compounds, the reaction was initiated by the addition of Ac-DEVD-AMC substrate (25 μL) to yield the following final concentrations: 20 μM Ac-DEVD-AMC and 10 μM compound for single-point screening. Minimum (columns 1 and 2; + Ac-DEVD-CHO at 10-fold its IC50 value) and maximum (columns 23 and 24; DMSO only) signal controls were included on every plate. After 60 min, reactions were halted with SDS (0.05% final) and fluorescence measured as above. Inhibition data was analyzed in ActivityBase using Excel.

For dose-response measurements, 10 point 2-fold serial dilutions of the compounds of interest (10 mM stock concentrations in DMSO) were carried out in DMSO using the Biomek NX. Compounds (0.5 μL) were spotted from the dose response plates into 384-well plates and the assay carried out as above. IC50 values were determined as a function of relative fluorescence units versus inhibitor concentration. Compounds were tested in at least two independent experiments. For the CED-3 assay, the maximum concentration of DMSO is 1% and this concentration of DMSO did not affect the activity of CED-3 (data not shown).

2.6 Estimation of Assay Quality

As an estimate of assay quality, a Z’ factor [26, 27] was determined from the means and standard deviations of whole 384-well plates of maximum (Max) signal (enzyme and substrate) and minimum (Min) signal (enzyme, substrate and inhibitor). Z’ factor was calculated using the formula: Z’ = 1 − (3SDMax + 3SDMin)/(MeanMax − MeanMin), where 3SD = three standard deviations. Excel and Prism 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) were used to perform the calculations and statistical analyses needed to determine the Z’ factor. Acceptable criteria for HTS were Z’ scores > 0.5 and coefficient of variation (CV) < 10% [27].

2.7 Statistical analysis

Prism 5 software was used for nonlinear regression analysis. IC50 values and Hill slopes were determined using a four-parameter dose-response (variable slope) fit.

3. Results

3.1 CED-3 HTS assay optimization and validation

We expressed recombinant C. elegans CED-3 in E. coli as a FLAG-tagged fusion protein. However, yields of purified FLAG-CED-3 from the lysate using anti-FLAG affinity capture were low and insufficient for HTS. Therefore, we assessed whether the crude lysate (termed CED-3L) would provide a suitable source of active CED-3 for HTS by testing cleavage of a specific caspase-3 substrate. CED-3L activity was measured using a fluorogenic assay monitoring the cleavage of Ac-DEVD-AMC in the presence and absence of the potent and selective caspase-3 inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO. Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibited CED-3L with an IC50 value of 1.90 nM and a calculated Hill slope = −0.994 (Fig. 1A). Sufficient purified CED-3 was obtained to allow assay validation and for confirmation studies of HTS actives. A comparable IC50 value of 2.7 nM was obtained for inhibition of purified CED-3 by Ac-DEVD-CHO (Fig. 1B) indicating that the crude lysate fraction could be used as the source for CED-3 enzymatic activity. Further, a comparable IC50 value of 1.98 nM was determined for Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibition of commercially available human caspase-3 (HCASP3) (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1. Dose response analysis of the caspase inhibitor DEVD-CHO on C.elegans CED-3 and human caspase-3 using a fluorogenic assay.

Fig. 1

Caspase activity was determined in a fluorogenic assay using the substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC. (A) The gene for C. elegans, CED-3, was expressed in E. coli and the crude lysate used as the source for CED-3 enzymatic activity (CED-3L). Data points represent the average CED-3 activity (RFU) per concentration of the inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO and error bars show SD (n = 16). (B) Normalized dose response inhibition curves for purified CED-3 and human caspase-3 (HCASP3) by Ac-DEVD-CHO.

The CED-3 inhibition assay was adapted to 384-well format with a final assay volume of 50 μL. To facilitate HTS, the assay was simplified into two steps and CED-3L activity measured as an end point assay after 60 mins by halting the reaction with SDS (the final automation protocol is detailed in Supplementary Table 1). For HTS validation, the CED-3 assay was run in full automation with whole 384-well plates of maximum (CED-3 + substrate with DMSO only) and minimum (CED-3 + substrate with Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibitor at 10-fold its IC50 value) signal controls (Supplementary Fig. 1). To assess assay variability, the Z’-factor computation incorporates both the dynamic range of the assay and well-to-well variability and measures both assay quality and performance [26]. The Z’ for individual plates was 0.60, with CVs of <10% (Supplementary Fig. 1) demonstrating a suitable assay window and acceptable variability for HTS [27].

3.2 CED-3L HTS for inhibitor identification

To identify inhibitors of CED-3 an Asinex compound library of 28,880 small molecules was screened at 10 μM single point concentration. CED-3 inhibition values (%) were plotted for each compound (Fig. 2A). Seventy-five (75) active compounds exhibiting CED-3 inhibition at or above a 50% threshold were identified, corresponding to a primary hit rate of 0.26%. Compounds identified as single-point actives were first confirmed using the assay with CED-3 lysate (CED-3L) for dose response/IC50 determination. Dose-response data was loaded in ActivityBase and plots assessed for IC50 and Hill slope values. IC50 values were determined for the 34 compounds that achieved ≥ 50% inhibition of both crude CED-3L and purified CED-3 (data not shown). Of the 34 active compounds, 21 exhibited sigmoidal inhibitor dose-response curves with purified CED-3 (summarized in Fig. 2B). Among the 21 confirmed compounds (28% of the original 75 hits), IC50 values on purified CED-3 ranged from 0.75 to 31 μM. Six compounds had IC50 values < 10 μM and the 10 most potent inhibitors are listed in Table 1 with their Asinex IDs, IC50 values on CED-3L and purified CED-3, and Hill slope values. Fig. 3A shows the dose-response inhibition curves for the three most potent inhibitors of purified CED-3, including BAS 01202237 (IC50 = 0.75 μM); BAS 00519146 (IC50 = 1.5 μM) and BAS 05223612 (IC50 = 3.9 μM).

Fig. 2. High-throughput CED-3 inhibitor screening.

Fig. 2

(A) Compounds from the Asinex set were screened at single point 10 μM concentration versus CED3-L. The scatterplot shows percent inhibition for all compounds screened. Compounds showing >50% inhibition were selected for confirmation. (B) Summary of CED-3 inhibitor screening.

Table 1.

Inhibitory activity of the 10 most potent confirmed inhibitors from chemical library screen of C. elegans CED-3

Asinex Identifiera CED-3L IC50 (μM)b Purified CED-3 IC50 (μM)c Purified CED-3 Hill Slope Valued
BAS 01202237 11.1 0.75 1.5
BAS 00519146 19.6 1.5 1.6
BAS 05223612 24.5 3.9 1.7
BAS 00835000 30 4.9 1.38
BAS 02712220 13.5 7.7 0.9
BAS 00253468 21 9 1.79
BAS 02859639 27.1 10.9 0.69
BAS 01988614 43.1 13.6 0.62
BAS 02712108 41.5 13.6 1.21
BAS 00187854 34.7 14.6 1.27
a

Chemical identifier number provided by Asinex Corporation. Compounds are listed by potency on purified CED-3.

For IC50 determinations, serial dilutions of compounds were tested starting at a high concentration of 80 μMb or 20 μMc.

d

Hill slope values determined by XLfit in Activity base.

Fig. 3. Dose response curves for select hits and chemotypes.

Fig. 3

(A) Dose response curves and IC50 values for the top three hit compounds on purified CED-3. (B) Chemical structures for the four chemotypes and associated CED-3 versus HCASP3 IC50 values for chemotype 4. (C) Dose response curves and IC50 values for representative compound from chemotype 4 on purified CED-3 and HCASP3. Values represent the mean of at least two independent assays.

3.3 CED-3 chemotype identification and activity versus HCASP3

We evaluated structural features of the 21 confirmed compounds by performing K-means clustering in order to group compounds with at least 60% similarity. Eight of the 21 compounds were grouped into one of four chemotype classes based on their structural similarity (Fig. 3B). The remaining thirteen confirmed inhibitors were structurally unrelated and had IC50 values ranging from 3.9 to 43.4 μM. For all 21 confirmed CED-3 inhibitors, Supplementary Table 2 summarizes Asinex IDs, molecular structures, IC50 values for purified CED-3 and HCASP3, Hill slope values and chemotype.

To assess selectivity of the C.elegans CED-3 hits versus the human caspase-3 (HCASP3), the CED-3 hits were tested for dose-response in a comparable assay using commercially available purified HCASP3. The assay for human CASP3 was first validated using procedures previously described for the CED-3 assay with Ac-DEVD-CHO inhibiting purified HCASP3 with an IC50 value of 1.98 nM (see Fig. 1B). The corresponding IC50 values versus the HCASP3 are shown in Supplementary Table 2. Of the 21 confirmed CED-3 hits, seven compounds were active on HCASP3 with the remainder showing no inhibition of HCASP3 at the concentrations tested. Interestingly, BAS 00519146, the second most potent cluster 4 inhibitor, is more potent against CED-3 than HCASP3 (IC50 CED-3 = 1.5 μM versus IC50 HCASP-3 = 10.8 μM) (Fig. 3C). Differences in binding affinity to HCASP-3 versus CED-3 are likely due to the fact these two enzymes share only 50% sequence identity.

4. Discussion

The nematode C.elegans has long been utilized as a model organism to understand programmed cell death and apoptosis. Activation of the caspase CED-3 is the final step in the apoptotic cascade in C.elegans and the availability of selective small molecule inhibitors to the apoptotic machinery in C.elegans would be invaluable as molecular probes to dissect apoptotic signaling pathways. The current study describes how novel small molecule inhibitors targeting the C.elegans caspase CED-3 were identified from high-throughput screening. First, as it proved challenging to generate sufficient purified CED-3 for HTS, we demonstrated that crude lysate from E.coli expressing the recombinant CED-3 could be used as the source of active enzyme for the screen. Typically purified enzyme would be the optimal choice for any assay [28]. The availability of both a highly selective substrate that we hypothesized only CED-3 but not bacterial proteases can cleave, and a selective inhibitor, allowed us to validate the assay using the crude lysate as a source for active CED-3. IC50 values obtained from the crude lysate matched closely with those using the limited amount of the purified CED-3 we produced. Further, a Hill slope of very close to 1.0 was obtained with the crude lysate preparation of CED-3 demonstrating enzymatic purity. A Hill slope vastly different from 1.0 would be indicative of the presence of other enzyme activities [27]. These findings demonstrate the utility of the fluorogenic assay format for HTS [15, 2932].

Developing inhibitors to caspases using peptides and peptidomimetic compounds has been challenging because of their poor bioavailability [19]. Therefore, we screened a library of small molecules with drug-like properties [25] for their effectiveness in inhibiting the enzymatic cleavage of the fluorogenic caspase-3 substrate Ac-DEVD-AMC as a means to identify potential CED-3 inhibitors. Out of the compound library of 28,800 small molecules, we initially identified 75 actives; 21 of which were confirmed by dose-response with the purified CED-3 enzyme. The relatively low confirmation rate may indicate a number of false positives interfering with this fluorogenic assay or the challenges with using crude lysate for HTS. Potentially for the latter, if additional HTS is undertaken, this could be addressed by using either a “negative lysate control” (i.e. lysate with no CED-3 expression) or testing the compounds in the presence of lysate expressing a catalytically inactive CED-3 mutant. In general, the hit compounds were more potent on the purified CED-3 versus the crude lysate preparation suggesting potential compound stability or solubility issues with using crude lysate. The identification of four distinct chemotypes shows the ability of the assay to mine structurally related compounds from a diverse set of molecules.

Benzenoid chemicals, in particular benzoquinones, have been shown to directly inhibit caspase-3 by oxidation of the catalytic cysteine [21]. From the 21 confirmed hits, we identified several that may potentially lead to a benzoquinone-like state via common metabolic transformation in vivo (e.g. by demethylation or hydroxylation), including members of clusters 1, 2 and 4 that have p-substituted aromatics. In particular, of the hits, BAS 05223612 already includes a benzoquinone structural motif. In contrast, because some hits that have the p-substituted aromatic substructure also have a fluorine substitution at this position, they are not reasonably anticipated to form a benzoquinone-like metabolite (e.g. BAS 02559443 of cluster 2) and these might present an alternate mechanism of inhibition. Further, structurally, chemotype 3 is distinct from the benzoquinone motif and would potentially inhibit CED-3 by a unique mechanism.

CED-3 shares sequence homology and function in terms of active site inhibitor binding residues with the HCASP3 [33]. Hence, we also assessed the confirmed CED-3 hits for inhibition of HCASP3. We identified CED-3 inhibitors with >10-fold selectivity over HCASP3 and some that were equally potent or more so on the human enzyme. For example, inhibitors from chemotype 4 inhibited both CED-3 and HCASP3 whereas those from chemotypes 1 and 2 only inhibited CED-3. As might be expected the compound possessing the benzoquinone motif (BAS 05223612) inhibited both CED-3 and HCAPS3. Two compounds, BAS01847186 and BAS0261429, were as potent or more so on HCASP3 compared to CED-3. These data suggest that the CED-3 inhibitors we identified have potentially differing modes of binding.

Small molecule probes to CED-3 would have utility in dissecting the various mechanistic roles of CED-3. Interestingly, CED-3 has been shown to also have non-apoptotic functions in C.elegans [34], including a role in axon regeneration [35]. Further, targeting caspases in pathogenic nematodes with selective small molecules may have therapeutic utility [36]. In summary, using a validated high-throughput screen we have identified novel small molecule inhibitors of CED-3, that in the future, have the potential to be developed as molecular probes.

Supplementary Material

1

Supplementary Fig. 1. CED-3 assay validation. CED-3 assay variability was assessed at maximum signal (CED-3L + Ac-DEVD-AMC +DMSO; top trace ■), mid signal (CED-3L + Ac-DEVD-AMC + 3 nM Ac-DEVD-CHO; middle trace ◆) and minimum signal (CED-3L + Ac-DEVD-AMC + 30 nM Ac-DEVD-CHO; bottom trace▲). Z’-factors, standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variance (CV) calculations were performed in Excel.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Highlights.

  • The validation of crude lysate as a source for active recombinant CED-3 in HTS.

  • 21 confirmed hits and 4 distinct chemotypes inhibiting CED-3 were identified.

  • A subset of CED-3 hits had selectivity over human caspase-3.

  • Several of the CED-3 hits differ structurally from the benzoquinone motif.

  • These CED-3 hits have the potential to be developed as selective molecular probes.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Chun Zhan (ESOP, UNC-CH) for optimization of caspase assays, Jonathan Sexton and Christopher Laudeman (BRITE, NCCU) with help on data analysis and Susan Yeyeodu for assistance with manuscript writing. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01NS047650) to R.L. and funding from Golden LEAF Foundation and the BIOIMPACT Initiative of North Carolina state through the BRITE Center for Excellence (K.P.W.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Galluzzi L, López-Soto A, Kumar S, Kroemer G. Caspases connect cell-death signaling to organismal homeostasis. Immunity. 2016;44:221–231. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Riedl SJ, Shi Y. Molecular mechanisms of caspase regulation during apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:897–907. doi: 10.1038/nrm1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yuan J, Shaham S, Ledoux S, Ellis HM, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans cell death gene ced-3 encodes a protein similar to mammalian interleukin-1β-converting enzyme. Cell. 1993;75:641–652. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90485-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boyce M, Degterev A, Yuan J. Caspases: an ancient cellular sword of Damocles. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:29–37. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shaham S. Identification of multiple Caenorhabditis elegans caspases and their potential roles in proteolytic cascades. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:35109–35117. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.52.35109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lettre G, Hengartner MO. Developmental apoptosis in C. elegans: a complex CEDnario. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:97–108. doi: 10.1038/nrm1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conradt B, Wu YC, Xue D. Programmed cell death during Caenorhabditis elegans development. Genetics. 2016;203:1533–1562. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.186247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen X, Wang Y, Chen YZ, Harry BL, Nakagawa A, Lee ES, Guo H, Xue D. Regulation of CED-3 caspase localization and activation by C. elegans nuclear-membrane protein NPP-14. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:958–964. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brady GF, Duckett CS. A caspase homolog keeps CED-3 in check. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nakagawa A, Shi Y, Kage-Nakadai E, Mitani S, Xue D. Caspase-dependent conversion of Dicer ribonuclease into a death-promoting deoxyribonuclease. Science. 2010;328:327–334. doi: 10.1126/science.1182374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xue D, Shaham S, Horvitz HR. The Caenorhabditis elegans cell-death protein CED-3 is a cysteine protease with substrate specificities similar to those of the human CPP32 protease. Genes Dev. 1996;10:1073–1083. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.9.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thornberry NA, Rano TA, Peterson EP, Rasper DM, Timkey T, Garcia-Calvo M, Houtzager VM, Nordstrom PA, Roy S, Vaillancourt JP, Chapman KT, Nicholson DW. A combinatorial approach defines specificities of members of the caspase family and granzyme B. Functional relationships established for key mediators of apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:17907–17911. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.29.17907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Earnshaw WC, Martins LM, Kaufmann SH. Mammalian caspases: structure, activation, substrates, and functions during apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:383–424. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xue D, Horvitz HR. Inhibition of the Caenorhabditis elegans cell-death protease CED-3 by a CED-3 cleavage site in baculovirus p35 protein. Nature. 1995;377:248–251. doi: 10.1038/377248a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gurtu V, Kain SR, Zhang G. Fluorometric and colorimetric detection of caspase activity associated with apoptosis. Anal Biochem. 1997;251:98–102. doi: 10.1006/abio.1997.2220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu J, Bhalgat M, Zhang C, Diwu Z, Hoyland B, Klaubert DH. Fluorescent molecular probes V: a sensitive caspase-3 substrate for fluorometric assays. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;9:3231–3236. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(99)00566-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yuan J, Ren J, Wang Y, He X, Zhao Y. Acteoside Binds to Caspase-3 and Exerts Neuroprotection in the Rotenone Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. PloS one. 2016;11:e0162696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seneci P. Small molecules as pro-apoptotic anticancer agents. Pharmaceutical patent analyst. 2012;1:483–505. doi: 10.4155/ppa.12.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bruno BJ, Miller GD, Lim CS. Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery. Therapeutic delivery. 2013;4:1443–1467. doi: 10.4155/tde.13.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang C, Yan N, Parish J, Wang X, Shi Y, Xue D. RNA aptamers targeting the cell death inhibitor CED-9 induce cell killing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:9137–9144. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511742200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kokel D, Xue D. A class of benzenoid chemicals suppresses apoptosis in C. elegans. Chembiochem. 2006;7:2010–2015. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kokel D, Li Y, Qin J, Xue D. The nongenotoxic carcinogens naphthalene and paradichlorobenzene suppress apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature chemical biology. 2006;2:338–345. doi: 10.1038/nchembio791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Y, Qian L, Yuan J. Small molecule probes for cellular death machines. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2017;39:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schreiber SL, Kotz JD, Li M, Aubé J, Austin CP, Reed JC, Rosen H, White EL, Sklar LA, Lindsley CW. Advancing biological understanding and therapeutics discovery with small-molecule probes. Cell. 2015;161:1252–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 1997;23:3–25. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang JH, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4:67–73. doi: 10.1177/108705719900400206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Williams KP, Scott JE. Enzyme assay design for high-throughput screening. In: Janzen WP, Bernasconi P, editors. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, NJ) Springer; New York: 2009. pp. 107–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scott J, Williams K. Validating Identity, Mass Purity and Enzymatic Purity of Enzyme Preparations. In: Sittampalam GS, Gal-Edd N, Arkin M, Auld D, Austin C, Bejcek B, Glicksman M, Inglese J, Lemmon V, Li Z, editors. Assay Guidance Manual [Internet] Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Bethesda (MD): 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Irvine J, Luft C, Pressley D, Hodge C, Janzen B. Assay development and high-throughput screening of caspases in microfluidic format. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2003;6:303–312. doi: 10.2174/138620703106298554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.O’Brien MA, Daily WJ, Hesselberth PE, Moravec RA, Scurria MA, Klaubert DH, Bulleit RF, Wood KV. Homogeneous, bioluminescent protease assays: caspase-3 as a model. Journal of Biomolecular Screening. 2005;10:137–148. doi: 10.1177/1087057104271865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van Noorden CJ. The history of Z-VAD-FMK, a tool for understanding the significance of caspase inhibition. Acta Histochem. 2001;103:241–251. doi: 10.1078/0065-1281-00601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang ZQ, Liao J, Diwu Z. N-DEVD-N′-morpholinecarbonyl-rhodamine 110: novel caspase-3 fluorogenic substrates for cell-based apoptosis assay. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2005;15:2335–2338. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.02.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Azim MK, Grossmann JG, Zaidi ZH. Homology modeling of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans CED3 protein–inhibitor complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;281:115–121. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weaver BP, Zabinsky R, Weaver YM, Lee ES, Xue D, Han M. CED-3 caspase acts with miRNAs to regulate non-apoptotic gene expression dynamics for robust development in C. elegans. Elife. 2014;3:e04265. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pinan-Lucarre B, Gabel CV, Reina CP, Hulme SE, Shevkoplyas SS, Slone RD, Xue J, Qiao Y, Weisberg S, Roodhouse K. The core apoptotic executioner proteins CED-3 and CED-4 promote initiation of neuronal regeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mohapatra AD, Kumar S, Satapathy AK, Ravindran B. Caspase dependent programmed cell death in developing embryos: a potential target for therapeutic intervention against pathogenic nematodes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Supplementary Fig. 1. CED-3 assay validation. CED-3 assay variability was assessed at maximum signal (CED-3L + Ac-DEVD-AMC +DMSO; top trace ■), mid signal (CED-3L + Ac-DEVD-AMC + 3 nM Ac-DEVD-CHO; middle trace ◆) and minimum signal (CED-3L + Ac-DEVD-AMC + 30 nM Ac-DEVD-CHO; bottom trace▲). Z’-factors, standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variance (CV) calculations were performed in Excel.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

RESOURCES