Skip to main content
PMC home page
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2016 Nov 4;95(44):e5210. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005210

Can Aidi injection restore cellular immunity and improve clinical efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy? A meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials following the PRISMA guidelines

Zheng Xiao a,b, Chengqiong Wang a,b, Yongping Sun c, Nana Li a,b, Jing Li a,f, Ling Chen a,b, Xingsheng Yao d, Jie Ding g, Hu Ma e
Editor: Alfons Lawen
PMCID: PMC5591112  PMID: 27858864

Abstract

Background:

Aidi injection is an adjuvant chemotherapy drug commonly used in China. Can Aidi injection restore the cellular immunity and improve the clinical efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy? There is a lack of strong evidence to prove it. To further reveal it, we systematically evaluated all related studies. We collected all studies about the clinical efficacy and cellular immunity of Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy for NSCLC in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, China national knowledge infrastructure database (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Full-Text Database (VIP), Wanfang, China biological medicine database (CBM) (established to June 2015), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT) (June 2015), Chinese clinical trial registry, and US-clinical trials (June 2015). We evaluated their quality according to the Cochrane evaluation handbook of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (5.1.0), extracted data following the patient intervention control group outcomes principles and synthesized the data by meta-analysis. Seventeen (RCTs) with 1390 NSCLC patients were included, with general methodological quality in most trials. The merged relative risk (RR) values and their 95% CI of meta-analysis for objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were as follows: 1.26 (1.12, 1.42) and 1.11(1.04, 1.17). The merged standardized mean difference (SMD) values and their 95% CI of meta-analysis for the percentage of CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio were as follows: 1.41, (0.89, 1.92), 1.59, (1.07, 2.11), 0.85, (0.38, 1.33), 1.64 (0.89, 2.39) and 0.91, (0.58, 1.24). Compared with platinum-based chemotherapy alone, all differences were statistically significant. These results might be overestimated or underestimated.

Conclusions:

Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy can improve the clinical efficacy of patients with NSCLC. Aidi injection could significantly restore the cellular immunity damaged by platinum-based chemotherapy. It may be an important tumor immune modulator and protector for patients with NSCLC treated with chemotherapy.

Keywords: adjuvant chemotherapy, Aidi injection, cellular immunity, meta-analysis, non-small-cell lung cancer, platinum-based chemotherapy

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both more and less developed countries.[1–2] Approximately 80% of lung cancers are non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Over 50% of patients with NSCLC have advanced local invasion and metastasis and therefore lose the opportunity for surgery.[3] Hence, they are forced to accept the systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy.[4–5] Platinum-based chemotherapy is an important treatment strategy for advanced stage and metastasis of NSCLC.[6–7] The systemic chemotherapy can damage the host immune cells and impair the antitumor response.[8–9] All these lead to poor clinical efficacy and substandard quality of life (QOL) for patients. Therefore, finding a way to restore host immunity and improve clinical efficacy is consequential.

Aidi injection (Z52020236, China food and Drug Administration) is an adjuvant chemotherapy drug commonly used in China, which is composed by the extracts of Astragalus (Astragalus membranaceus), Eleutherococcus senticosus (Acanthopanax senticosus), ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Mey), and cantharidin (Lytta vesicatoria). Most studies[10–13] had shown that Astragalus, Eleutherococcus senticosus, cantharidin, and ginseng appear to improve host immunity through relieving immunosurveillance and restoring T-cell function damaged by chemotherapy. Can Aidi injection restore the cellular immunity and improve the clinical efficacy in NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy? Related studies [14–15] had shown that Aidi injection might restore cellular immunity and improve the clinical efficacy in NSCLC patients. Unfortunately, these conclusions were different in different studies with lower sample size. There is a lack of strong evidence to prove it. To reveal whether Aidi injection can restore the cellular immunity and improve the clinical efficacy in NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, we systematically evaluated all related studies.

2. Methods

This article followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

2.1. Literature search strategy

Two reviewers (Cheng-qiong Wang and Yongping Sun) independently searched articles in electronic databases using the search strategy (aidi or aidi injection) and (“Lung neoplasms” [Mesh] or pulmonary neoplasms or lung neoplasm or pulmonary neoplasm or lung cancer or lung cancers or pulmonary cancer or pulmonary cancers or lung carcinoma or pulmonary carcinoma or NSCLC). The published studies were retrieved in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Full-Text Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, China Biological Medicine Database (CBM) (established to June 2015), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT, Issue 6 of 12, June 2015). Unpublished studies were retrieved in Chinese clinical trial registry and US-clinical trials (established to June 2015). All retrievals were implemented by the Mesh and free word. No language restrictions were placed on the search. Ethical approval was not required, as our study is a meta-analysis of published studies.

2.2. Studies inclusion and exclusion criteria

2.2.1. Inclusion criteria

Included studies must meet the following criteria: the disease was diagnosed and confirmed with NSCLC (III-IV stage) in accordance with histopathological and cytological diagnostic criteria; there were randomized controlled trials (RCTs); the experimental group was Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy including vinorelbine and cisplatin (NP), cisplatin and docetaxel (DP), or cisplatin and gemcitabine (GP), control group was platinum-based chemotherapy alone; subjects before being included in the study did not receive other therapies including other Chinese herbs and intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy; there were no severe damages in liver or kidney function in any of the patients; according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines[16] for solid tumor responses, indicators were complete response (CR), partial response (PR), no change (NC), progressive disease (PD), objective response rate (ORR) equals CR + PR and disease control rate (DCR) equals CR + PR + NC, clinical efficacy was evaluated by objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), cellular immunity was evaluated by the percentage of CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells and natural killer cells (NK cells) and the CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio in peripheral blood, all cells were detected with immunocytochemistry or flow cytometry; time and settings: no restrictions were set on the duration of follow-ups or types of settings.

2.2.2. Exclusion criteria

Excluded studies must meet the following criteria: duplicated articles; unrelated studies including other themes, and animal and in-vitro studies; nonrandomized controlled studies; abstracts and reviews without specific data; studies with inaccurate information or non-usable statistical data.

2.3. Study quality evaluation

We evaluated the quality of all included studies according to the Cochrane evaluation handbook of RCTs (5.1.0).[17] The bias parameters were the random sequence generation (selection bias), the allocation concealment (selection bias), the blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), the blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), the incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), the selective report (reporting bias), and the other bias. We judged each item on 3 levels (“Yes” for low bias, “No” for high risk of bias and “Unclear”). Then, we assessed the trials and categorized them into three levels: low risk of bias (all the items were categorized “Yes”), high risk of bias (at least one item ranked “No”) and unclear risk of bias (at least one item was “Unclear”).

2.4. Selection and evaluation of articles

Two reviewers (Jing Li and Cheng-qiong Wang) independently selected and evaluated articles according to the above standards. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion between themselves or with Xingsheng Yao.

2.5. Data extraction and statistical analysis

Two reviewers (Nana Li and Cheng-qiong Wang) independently extracted all data including: publishing time and country; study design including the randomization methods, demographic characteristics and blinding implementation; the sample size of experimental and control group, clinical efficacy and cellular immunity. Meta-analysis was done by two reviewers (Jing Li and Zheng Xiao) with Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The relative risk (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Statistical heterogeneity across trials was assessed by χ2-based Q-statistic test and the consistency was calculated by I2. If the homogeneity (P ≥ 0.1, I2 ≤ 50%) was not rejected, the fixed-effects model was used to calculate the summary RR or SMD and the 95% CI. The results were analyzed by random-effects model if the heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I2 > 50%) was higher and the results of the fixed-and random-effect model had good consistency. The clinical heterogeneity was handled by strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and subgroup analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was reduced by random-effects model if the results of the fixed- and random-effect model had good consistency. Otherwise, the results were analyzed by descriptive analysis. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots if there were more than 10 included studies. The sensitivity was evaluated through deleting the studies with high weight and significant differences.

3. Results

3.1. Search results

The initial database search identified 1730 published studies using our search strategies and unpublished studies were not retrieved (Fig. 1). After successively applying the study exclusion criteria, 17 RCTs were included.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Articles retrieved and assessed for eligibility. After successively applying the study exclusion criteria, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.

3.2. Characteristics of the included studies

Seventeen RCTs with 1390 NSCLC patients (III-IV stage) in China were included in this meta-analysis (Table 1). The cases of Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone were 701 and 689, respectively. The males and females were 814 and 460, respectively, with age range between 27 and 78 years. The dosage of Aidi injection was 40–100 mL/day and treatment time was 10 days to 28 days. Clinical efficacy and cellular immunity were evaluated at 2 weeks to 12 weeks.

Table 1.

The characteristics of the included studies.

3.2.

Open in a new tab

3.3. Methodological bias of the included studies

In 17 trials, the methods of random allocation were described clearly in only 3 trials. This indicated that there was selectivity bias in the included studies. The random allocation concealment was implemented by envelope and was open by hospitalization orders respectively in 2 trials. Not all the included studies were described as blinding to patients and doctors. Therefore, it indicated that there was selection bias. All data were complete and selective report did not appear in all of the studies. Other bias was not clear. Characteristics and quality of all included studies are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Risk of methodological bias of the included studies. There was general methodological quality in most trials.

3.4. Clinical efficacy

Seventeen RCTs with 1390 cases were included (Fig. 3A). There was homogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis showed that the ORR was statistically different between the 2 groups [RR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.12, 1.42), P = 0.0001] by fixed-effects model. Sixteen RCTs with 1344 cases were included (Fig. 3B). There was homogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis showed that the DCR was statistically different between the 2 groups [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.04, 1.17), P = 0.0005] by fixed-effects model. All results showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy could significantly improve the ORR and DCR of patients with NSCLC.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Meta-analysis of the ORR between 2 groups. Meta-analysis showed that the ORR was statistically different between the 2 groups [RR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.12, 1.42), P = 0.0001] by fixed-effects model. (B) Meta-analysis of the DCR between 2 groups. Meta-analysis showed that the DCR was statistically different between the 2 groups [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.04, 1.17), P = 0.0001] by fixed-effects model. DCR = disease control rate, ORR = objective response rate, RR = relative risk.

3.5. Cellular immunity

3.5.1. CD3+T cells

In 17 RCTs, 14 trials with 1194 cases were included (Fig. 4). There was statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 94%). Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of CD3+T cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 1.41, 95% CI (0.89, 1.92), P < 0.00001] by random-effect model.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of the CD3+T cells. Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of CD3+T cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 1.41, 95% CI (0.89, 1.92), P<0.00001] by random effect model. SMD = standardized mean difference.

3.5.2. CD4+ T cells

In 17 RCTs, 16 trials with 1320 cases were included (Fig. 5). There was statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 94%). Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of CD4+ T cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 1.59, 95% CI (1.07, 2.11), P < 0.00001] by random-effect model.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of the CD4+T cells. Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of CD4+ T cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 1.59, 95% CI (1.07, 2.11), P<0.00001] by random effect model. SMD = standardized mean difference.

3.5.3. CD8+T cells

In 17 RCTs, 16 trials with 1320 cases were included (Fig. 6). There was statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 94%). Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of CD8+T cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 0.85, 95% CI (0.38, 1.33), P = 0.0004] by random-effect model.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of CD8+T cells. Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of CD8+T cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 0.85, 95% CI (0.38, 1.33), P = 0.0004] by random effect model. SMD = standardized mean difference.

3.5.4. CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio

In 17 RCTs, 14 trials with 1071 cases were included (Fig. 7). There was statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 85%). Meta-analysis showed that the CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 0.91, 95% CI (0.58, 1.24), P < 0.00001] by random-effect model.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio. Meta-analysis showed that the CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 0.91, 95% CI (0.58, 1.24), P<0.00001] by random effect model. SMD = standardized mean difference.

3.6. NK cells

In 17 RCTs, 8 trials with 763 cases were included (Fig. 8). There was statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 95%). Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of NK cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 1.64, 95% CI (0.89, 2.39), P < 0.0001] by random-effect model. All results showed that Aidi injection could significantly improve the percentage of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells, and the CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio in the peripheral blood of patients with NSCLC.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Meta-analysis of NK cells. Meta-analysis showed that the percentage of NK cells was statistically different between the 2 groups [SMD = 1.64, 95% CI (0.89, 2.39), P<0.0001] by random effect model. NK = natural killer, SMD = standardized mean difference.

3.7. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis

The funnel plots were symmetric in the studies about ORR and DCR (Fig. 9A and B). This indicated that there was no publication bias in these studies which objectively reported the results. The funnel plots were significantly asymmetric in the studies about the CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, and CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio (Fig. 9C–F). Results showed that all points were asymmetric and some points were distributed outside of the funnel. This indicated that there was publication bias in the included studies which influenced the results of our analysis. In all, these results might be overestimated or underestimated. After excluding the over- or underestimated studies, meta-analysis showed that the results before and after exclusion had a good consistency (Table 2).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Funnel plot. There was a publication bias in included studies which influenced the results of our analysis.

Table 2.

Publication bias and sensitivity analysis.

3.7.

Open in a new tab

3.8. Sensitivity analysis

There was high statistical heterogeneity between studies in the meta-analysis of CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio, and NK cells. These results of the fixed- and random-effect model had good consistency. Therefore, these results were analyzed by random-effects model. After deleting the studies with high weight and significant differences, all results before and after deleting had good consistency. All results showed that the stability was good in this meta-analysis.

4. Discussion

In this study, 17 RCTs were finally included. There were 1390 NSCLC (III-IV) patients which included 814 male and 460 female patients between 27 and 78 years of age. The dosage of Aidi injection was 40–100 mL/day and treatment time was 10–28 days. According to the WHO guidelines, meta-analysis showed that Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy could significantly improve the ORR and DCR of patients with NSCLC. There was no publication bias in any of these studies. Other similar meta-analysis[35] showed that Aidi injection plus TP also could significantly improve the clinical efficiency of patients with NSCLC. This provided indirect evidence for the above conclusions. So far, there was no reliable evidence to confirm the long-term efficacy. Cantharidin and Astragalus are important components of Aidi injection. Animal studies[36–37] also showed that cantharidin could significantly inhibit the growth of liver cancer cells and prolong the median survival time of tumor-bearing mice by enhancing the immune function. In vitro studies[37] showed that cantharidin could inhibit the tumor cells proliferation and induce the tumor cells apoptosis. Many studies[10–13,38–39] also showed that Astragalus, Eleutherococcus senticosus and ginseng had important anti-tumor activity. These results provided evidences for the anti-tumor mechanisms of Aidi injection in NSCLC. In summary, we believe that Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy can improve the clinical efficacy of patients with NSCLC.

Immune function damage is a serious adverse reaction, including lower anti-tumor and anti-infective immunity induced by platinum-based chemotherapy. This meta-analysis showed that Aidi injection could significantly increase the percentage of CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, and NK cells, and the CD4+/CD8+ T cells ratio of peripheral blood. But, there was publication bias in the included studies and these results might be overestimated or underestimated. After excluding the over or underestimated studies, meta-analysis showed that the results before and after exclusion had a good consistency. Therefore, these results are scientific and reliable. Zhang et al[15,40–41] found that Aidi injection could reduce the apoptosis rate of peripheral blood lymphocytes and decrease the number of CD4+CD25+T cells in patients with advanced lung cancer. This study suggests that Aidi injection may enhance cellular immunity through protecting immune cells from apoptosis and reducing Treg cells induced by chemotherapeutics. Xu et al[42] showed that the serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) was increased and the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were decreased after Aidi injection plus chemotherapy. This study suggests that Aidi injection may enhance cellular immunity by non-specific immune pathway. Many studies[43–45]also showed that Astragalus, Eleutherococcus senticosus, and ginseng were important immunoregulators which could activate the anti-tumor immunity through promoting the tumor immunity-related cytokines and decreasing the chance for the tumor to evade treatment- or metastasis-related cytokines. These studies provided evidences for the mechanisms that Aidi injection could restore the cellular immunity damaged by platinum-based chemotherapy. On the whole, Aidi injection may be an important immune modulator and protector for NSCLC through inspiring the non-specific immune pathway, protecting immune cells from apoptosis, and reducing Treg cells.

5. Limitations

There were some limitations in this study. Firstly, Chinese and English databases were retrieved, but not Japanese and Korean databases; all studies were published in China. These might lead to ethnical bias. Secondly, in 17 included trials, only 3 trials described the random allocation method. The allocation concealment was open or implemented in 2 trials and blinding was not described in all of the included trials. These indicated that there were selection bias and implementation bias and therefore led to the overestimation of the efficacy of the treatment group. There was no selective report and other bias was unclear. Thirdly, the long-term efficacy has not been evaluated. This might lead to an inadequate assessment. Fourthly, all immune indicators were detected by different methods in different studies. This might lead to detecting bias or insufficient assessment to cellular immunity. All together, the quality of the included studies is inadequate and the results need to be further confirmed by standardized studies including RCT or real-world studies.

6. Conclusions

Aidi injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy can improve the clinical efficacy of patients with NSCLC. Aidi injection could significantly restore the cellular immunity damaged by platinum-based chemotherapy. It may be an important tumor immune modulator and protector for patients with NSCLC treated with chemotherapy. The quality of the included studies is inadequate. The results need to be confirmed by further large sample RCT or real-world studies.

6.1. Supporting information

S1 PRISMA Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, Figure 1.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AD = Aidi injection, CBM = China biological medicine database, CCRCT = Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CI = confidence interval, CNKI = China national knowledge infrastructure database, CR = complete response, DCR = disease control rate, DO = docetaxel and oxaliplatin, DP = docetaxel and cisplatin, FDH = cisplatin plus hydroxycamptothecin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, GO = gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, GP = gemcitabine and cisplatin, IL-6 = interleukin-6, NC = no change, NK cells = natural killer cells, NP = vinorelbine and cisplatin, NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer, ORR = objective response rate, PC = paclitaxel and cisplatin, PD = progressive disease, PP = pemetrexed and cisplatin, PR = partial response, PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, RCTs = randomized controlled trials, RR = relative risk, SMD = standardized mean difference, TGF-β = transforming growth factor-β, TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-α, VIP = Chinese Scientific Journals Full-Text Database, WHO = World Health Organization.

Authors’ contributions: ZX conceived and designed the experiments. CW, YS, JL, and NL performed the experiments. JL and ZX analyzed the data. ZX wrote the manuscript. LC, XY, and HM proofread the manuscript. All authors reviewed the PRISMA criteria for authorship and agreed with manuscript results and conclusions. All authors contributed to the content of the manuscript, reviewed, and approved the final version, and contributed to the decision to publish the manuscript.

Funding/support: This work was funded by grants from development fund of evidence-based transformation in Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College (No. 2016), doctoral fund of Zunyi Medical College (No. F-617), planning fund of philosophy and social science in Guizhou (No. 14GZYB58) and The Fifth Science and Technology Innovation Team for “Basic and Clinical Studies of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in Guizhou Province” (No. 2012 4011).

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:87–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61:69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grilli R, Oxman AD, Julian JA. Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how much benefit is enough? J Clin Oncol 1993; 11:1866–1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hsia TC, Tu CY, Fang HY, et al. Cost and effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for non-operated localized lung cancer: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7:1643–1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anagnostou VK, Brahmer JR. Cancer immunotherapy: a future paradigm shift in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:976–984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lin H, Jiang J, Liang X, et al. Chemotherapy with cetuximab or chemotherapy alone for untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2010; 70:57–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goffin J, Lacchetti C, Ellis PM, et al. First-line systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5:260–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gebremeskel S, Johnston B. Concepts and mechanisms underlying chemotherapy induced immunogenic cell death: Impact on clinical studies and considerations for combined therapies. Oncotarget 2015; 6:41600–41619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rebe C, Ghiringhelli F. Cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy on cancer and immune cells: how can it be modulated to generate novel therapeutic strategies? Future Oncol 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chu DT, Lepe-Zuniga J, Wong WL, et al. Fractionated extract of Astragalus membranaceus, a Chinese medicinal herb, potentiates LAK cell cytotoxicity generated by a low dose of recombinant interleukin-2. J Clin Lab Immunol 1988; 26:183–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chu DT, Wong WL, Mavligit GM. Immunotherapy with Chinese medicinal herbs. II. Reversal of cyclophosphamide-induced immune suppression by administration of fractionated Astragalus membranaceus in vivo. J Clin Lab Immunol 1988; 25:125–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kormosh N, Laktionov K, Antoshechkina M. Effect of a combination of extract from several plants on cell-mediated and humoral immunity of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Phytother Res 2006; 20:424–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shao BM, Xu W, Dai H, et al. A study on the immune receptors for polysaccharides from the roots of Astragalus membranaceus, a Chinese medicinal herb. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 320:1103–1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun XF, Pei YT, Yin QW, et al. Application of Aidi injection in the bronchial artery infused neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III A non-small cell lung cancer before surgical operation. Chin J Integr Med 2010; 16:537–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang B, Yang L, Yue Q, et al. Effect of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy on CD4+ CDhi25CDlow127 regulatory T cells in peripheral blood of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Res Clinic 2011; 23:512–514,521. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981; 47:207–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://www.handbook.cochrane.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen W, Ma L, Jin C, et al. Clinical observation of Aidi injection plus hydroxyl based chemotherapy in treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res Clinic 2003; 15:199–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gao P. Aidi injection plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical observation. Henan J TCM 2003; 23:45–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang D, Chen Y, Ren J, et al. A randomized clinical study on efficacy of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Lung Cancer 2004; 7:247–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang H, Wang C, Wang R. Clinical observation on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with combination of chemotherapy and Aidi injection. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil 2004; 11:358–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cui Y, Wang W. Clinical observation of Aidi injection combining vinorelbine and cisplation in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Cancer Prev Treatment 2005; 12:456–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang A, Sun Z, Shu Q, et al. Treatment of terminal non-small cell lung cancer by Aidi injection and chemical therapy. Pract Clin J Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 2005; 5:26–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li H, Dong L, Li Y, et al. Aidi injection combined with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin for treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer. Zhejiang J ITCWM 2008; 18:473–475. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang X, Wang C, Lu Q, et al. Aidi injection combining vinorelbine and cisplation in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical observation of 60 cases. J ETCM 2008; 17:20–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang H, Zhang X. Clinical observation of Aidi injection combined chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. J TCM Univof Hunan 2009; 29:65–66,80. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan M. Clinical observation of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer. China Pract J Med 2010; 37:17–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jiang S, Mao X, Hong J. Aidi injection combining chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical observation of 32 cases. Zhejiang J ITCWM 2011; 21:24–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang T. Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae 2011; 17:261–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dong J, Ye X, Lu N, et al. Aidi injection combining pemetrexed plus cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical observation of 42 cases. Zhejiang J TCM 2013; 48:335–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ge C, Luo Z. Aidi injection combining docetaxel and cisplatinn in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical observation of 41 cases. Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy 2013; 19:47–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu S, Xu S. Clinical observation on the effect of Aidi injection in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Chin J Medicinal Guide 2013; 15:116–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li J, Wang J, Zhu Y, et al. Clinical observation of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy in treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer. Hainan Med J 2014; 25:3444–3447. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xing H, Wang L, Lv H, et al. Aidi combined with NP in treatment of elderly patients with non small cell lung cancer. Chin J Prim Med Pharm 2014; 21:280–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang Q, He X, Tian J, et al. A meta analysis of Aidi Injection plus taxotere and cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung Cancer. Chin J Lung Cancer 2010; 13:1027–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Han J-j, Yu J-m, Wu H-y, et al. Inhibitory effect of compound cantharides capsule on the proliferation of xenografts of human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG(2)215 in mice. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese Journal of Oncology] 2012; 34:821–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu X, Li Y, Wang F, et al. Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of new norcantharidin-conjugated hydroxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride chitosan derivatives as polymer therapeutics. Int J Pharm 2013; 453:610–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cichello SA, Yao Q, Dowell A, et al. Proliferative and Inhibitory Activity of Siberian ginseng (Eleutherococcus senticosus) Extract on Cancer Cell Lines; A-549, XWLC-05, HCT-116, CNE and Beas-2b. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16:4781–4786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang HC, Tseng YH, Wu HR, et al. Anti-proliferation effect on human breast cancer cells via inhibition of pRb phosphorylation by taiwanin E isolated from Eleutherococcus trifoliatus. Nat Prod Commun 2014; 9:1303–1306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang W, Zhu J. Significance and effect of apoptosis of peripheral blood lymphocyte and Treg cell change after addie injection treated patients with advanced lung cancer. Jilin Medical Journal 2012; 33:4056–4058. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tian J, Jia M, He Y, et al. Clinical observation on Aidi injection to reduce the CD4+ CD25 Treg+ cells in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehab 2011; 18:462–463. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu Y, Li P, Jiang Z, et al. Clinical efficacy and cytokines of Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy for lung cancer. Shanxi J TCM 2014; 35:388–390,391. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Amedei A, Prisco D, MM DE. The use of cytokines and chemokines in the cancer immunotherapy. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2013; 8:126–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Clement-Kruzel S, Hwang SA, Kruzel MC, et al. Immune modulation of macrophage pro-inflammatory response by goldenseal and Astragalus extracts. J Med Food 2008; 11:493–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee JM, Hah JO, Kim HS. The effect of red ginseng extract on inflammatory cytokines after chemotherapy in children. J Ginseng Res 2012; 36:383–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES