Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 7;5:e3788. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3788

Figure 3. Evaluation of MetaCRAST, Crass, and MinCED performance on simulated AMD (A and B) and EBPR (C and D) metagenomes.

Figure 3

The procedure used to generate the simulated metagenomes is described in Materials and Methods. All data points represent the averages of six individual simulations and are presented with error bars representing two times the standard error above and two below the average. The true number of spacers expected in each simulated metagenome is marked with a black line (138 expected in the AMD metagenomes; 219 in the EBPR metagenomes).