Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 25;8(34):57537–57542. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15734

Table 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 4 methods in the diagnosis of TBM.

Group TBM group (n = 172) non-TBM group (n = 28) Sensitivity (%) specificity (%) positive predictive value (%) negative predictive value (%) median time to final diagnosis
LAMP positive 74 2 43.02 92.86 97.37 20.97 1h
LAMP negative 98 26 —— —— —— —— ——
RTFQ PCR positive 59 0 34.30 100 100 19.86 4h
RTFQ PCR negative 113 28 —— —— —— —— ——
Acid-fast staining positive 5 0 2.91% 100 100 14.36 1d
Acid-fast staining negative 167 28 —— —— —— —— ——
MGIT960 culture positive 22 0 12.79 100 100 15.73 41d
MGIT960 culture negative 150 28 —— —— —— —— ——