Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 11;7:11221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11767-z

Bandgap renormalization in single-wall carbon nanotubes

Chunhui Zhu 1, Yujie Liu 1, Jieying Xu 1, Zhonghui Nie 1, Yao Li 1, Yongbing Xu 1, Rong Zhang 1, Fengqiu Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC5593862  PMID: 28894285

Abstract

Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have been extensively explored as an ultrafast nonlinear optical material. However, due to the numerous electronic and morphological arrangements, a simple and self-contained physical model that can unambiguously account for the rich photocarrier dynamics in SWNTs is still absent. Here, by performing broadband degenerate and non-degenerate pump-probe experiments on SWNTs of different chiralities and morphologies, we reveal strong evidences for the existence of bandgap renormalization in SWNTs. In particularly, it is found that the broadband transient response of SWNTs can be well explained by the combined effects of Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization, and the distinct dynamics is further influenced by the different sensitivity of degenerate and non-degenerate measurements to these two concurrent effects. Furthermore, we attribute optical-phonon bath thermalization as an underlying mechanism for the observed bandgap renormalization. Our findings provide new guidelines for interpreting the broadband optical response of carbon nanotubes.

Introduction

Single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) exhibit fascinating physical properties that are highly relevant to optoelectronic and photonic applications17. One prerequisite for engineering SWNT based-optical devices is the understanding of their photophysics on an ultrafast timescale. For instance, tracking ultrafast charge transfer processes between different SWNTs or SWNT-Si heterojunctions can provide important information for designing SWTN-based photovoltaic devices8, 9. Furthermore, the ultrafast dynamics of SWNTs offers reliable optical switching mechanism for laser mode-locking3, 4, 1012. Although there are numerous reports on ultrafast carrier dynamics of carbon nanotubes in the literature1325, correlating the experimental results with the underlying physical mechanisms has proved a challenge as it is affected by a number of factors, including SWNT chirality, dielectric medium surrounding the tubes and the experimental configurations for the transient absorption spectroscopy. For example, while ample experimental evidence has confirmed the excitonic nature of optical excitation of SWNTs2628, photo-generation of free carriers has been demonstrated by broadband pump-probe experiments25, and the actual role of free carriers in the relaxation processes of SWNTs has not been well understood. In addition, theoretical studies indicate that the electron-hot optical phonon coupling can lead to bandgap renormalization effect in carbon-based materials29, 30, however this effect has been largely neglected by previous ultrafast spectroscopy investigations. Another open question concerns the physical origin of photoinduced absorption (PA) signals. By performing non-degenerate pump-probe measurements, Korovyanko et al. found a structured PA band in the spectral region between S 11 and S 22 excitonic peaks16. Recently, degenerate pump-probe experiments carried out on similar SWNTs show photoinduced bleaching (PB) signatures in the same spectral region24. Up until now, it remains a significant challenge to account for the rich photocarrier dynamics of SWNTs using a simple and self-contained physical picture.

Here, to elaborate the broadband photocarrier dynamics of SWNTs and to ensure only intrinsic optical response is probed, we performed broadband (1–2.4 μm) degenerate and non-degenerate pump-probe measurements on SWNTs of different chiralities and morphologies. It is found that the excitonic peaks are always characterized by strong PB signals, while at the red side of the exciton resonances the signals tend to form a PA band. Through spectral and temporal analysis, we conclude that the observed PA signatures originate from a transient bandgap renormalization. Furthermore, our results indicate that the bandgap renormalization is likely to be caused by electron-hot phonon interactions according to Allen, Heine and Cardona’s (AHC’s) theory2933, in contrast to the hot electron−hole plasma origin that has been identified in other low-dimensional systems3436. This work provides an important new framework for interpreting existing results on ultrafast optical response of SWNTs.

Results

Two SWNT species with different chirality and diameter distributions, as synthesized by the HiPco and the Arc-discharge method, are used to study the ultrafast photocarrier dynamics of SWNTs. We chose to study SWNT ensembles because it is the material form most widely used in emerging optical applications, e.g. saturable absorbers and photodetectors17, 37, 38. Three SWNT samples, two with polymer matrix and one without, were prepared using a solution processing method (see Methods and Table 1). No aggregates or large bundles were discernible in the SWNT-CMC films24. Figure S1 shows the linear absorption spectra for three samples. The excitonic resonance peaks are clearly visible, and can be attribute to S 11 and S 22 transitions39.

Table 1.

The details of three SWNT samples.

Sample SWNT morphology Fabrication method SWNT purity Diameter range Matrix Supplier
HiPco-CMC Ensemble HiPco 95% 0.8–1.2 nm CMC NanoIntegris Inc.
Arc-CMC Ensemble Arc-discharge 90% 1.3–1.6 nm CMC Carbon solutions Inc.
Arc-w/o-CMC Ensemble Arc-discharge 90% 1.3–1.6 nm None Carbon solutions Inc.

To gain a general broadband optical switching signature, we first performed both degenerate and non-degenerate pump-probe experiments on sample HiPco-CMC and Arc-CMC, across 1.0 and 2.4 μm (1.24–0.52 eV). As shown in Figs S2 and 1, such measurements cover the S 11 transition for sample HiPco-CMC, as well as S 11 and S 22 transitions for sample Arc-CMC. Figure 2 shows the differential transmission spectra (ΔT/T 0) at time zero for both measurements. While the excitonic peaks are always characterized by strong PB signals regardless of degenerate or non-degenerate configurations as expected from previous literature25, the PA signals are found to be more complicated. A generalizable pattern however is discernible, i.e. the PA signatures tend to form a broad band at the low-energy side of the exciton resonances. We then extract the relaxation time constants for each probe wavelength. The relaxation time constants of PB are dependent on probe wavelength and experimental configurations, while the recovery times of PA are featureless and nearly identical, with a time constant ~1.5 ps (Fig. 3). Such a unifying time constant suggests that the PA signals share a common origin.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Energy diagram showing the measurements covering S 11 and S 22 for sample Arc-CMC. (a) Degenerated configuration. (b) Non-degenerated configuration. c n/v n represent n-th conduction or valence subbands.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Differential transmission spectra (ΔT/T 0) at time zero for sample HiPco-CMC (a) and sample Arc-CMC (b) with the degenerate (upper panel) and non-degenerate (lower panel) results, pump fluence ~300 μJ/cm2. The non-degenerate measurements are performed by using 800 nm pulses excitation. For the sample HiPco-CMC (a), the degenerate measurements always exhibit PB signatures (red points) and the PB signal vanishes at a wavelength about 2.2  μm, while the non-degenerate experiments are characterised by the emerging of a PA signal (blue points) at the red-side of S 11, ~1.7 μm. For the sample Arc-CMC (b), both measurements show a PA signal at the red-side of S 11, but the non-degenerate experiment also give a PA signal at the red-side of S 22. For the same wavelength range, only PB is observed in the degenerate experiments. The linear absorption of the SWNTs are shown as a visual guide.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The fitted recovery time constants as a function of probe wavelength for sample HiPco-CMC (a) and sample Arc-CMC (b) with the degenerate (upper panel) and non-degenerate (lower panel) results. The relaxation time constants of PB (red points) are dependent on probe wavelength and experimental configurations, while the recovery times of PA (blue points) are featureless and nearly identical, with a time constant ~1.5 ps, indicating that the PA signals share a common origin.

Discussion

Probe wavelength dependent photo-bleaching and photo-absorption signatures were revealed by previous pump-probe investigations and described by different mechanisms, such as intersubband transitions16, multiple-exciton formation4042, charge induced Stark effect4345 and global redshift of the π-plasmon resonance15. However, none of these mechanisms can explain our data very well. The broad PA signature rule out intersubband transitions and multiple-exciton formation, as both should correspond to a structured PA peak16, 40. Charge induced Stark effect is generated by long-lived charge carriers4345, however no long-time PA signals were observed in our measurements. In addition, by performing a 400 nm pump-probe measurement (Fig. S3), we identify a PB-PA transition at ~2 µm wavelength, clearly within the S 11 band of sample Arc-CMC. It challenges the non-resonance framework of global redshift of the π-plasmon resonance15. A more generic mechanism for the observed features needs to be elaborated.

It is known that SWNTs present very strong many-body interactions due to the quantum confinement effect46, 47. Hence, we argue that the many-body effects should be taken into account for comprehending the optical switching properties of SWNTs. Additional photocarriers can alter the screening of the Coulomb potential, resulting in both a reduction of exciton binding energy and electronic bandgap shrinkage3436, 48. However, the reduction of exciton binding energy and electronic bandgap shrinkage usually are of similar size48, thus no shift of the absorption spectrum is observed until the excited carrier density approaching the Mott transition density, where the exciton resonance no longer exists35. However, for our experimental pump fluence, the PB signals are found following the exciton resonance (as shown in Figs 2 and S3). Hence, it is safe to conclude that there is no Mott transition in out measurements, and carrier effect should not be responsible for the observed PA signals.

Another many-body effect stem from carrier-phonon coupling4952. The hot-carrier of SWNTs cool down by emitting optical phonons that lead to very fast phonon bath thermalization with a timescale <100 fs5355. As we noticed before, the quasiparticle band structures of materials can be renormalized by increasing optical-phonon temperature2933. For example, bandgap redshift by ~60 meV and broadening parameters differing by ~30 meV was obtained for diamond29. Figure 4 depicts the idea, which illustrate transient absorption spectra based on the bandgap renormalization (redshift and linewidth broadening) as well as Pauli blocking. Good qualitative agreement with the key features of our experimental pump-probe signal was obtained. Therefore, we conclude that the observed optical switching features maybe attribute to a bandgap renormalization, caused by the electron-hot optical phonon interactions. This assignment is also supported by the following arguments. First, such an interpretation agrees with the previous Raman investigation49, 51. By increasing the laser power, Fantini et al. found that S 11 peaks are broadened and red-shifted, and S 22 energies also present an average 70 meV red-shift, although it is red-shifted for the tubes with (2n + m) mod 3 = 1 and blue-shifted for the tubes with (2n + m) mod 3 = 249. Second, the relaxation time constants of PA signals coincide with the optical phonon lifetimes about 1–2 ps5558.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Illustration of the combined effects of Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization. (a) Ground-state absorption spectrum and excited-state absorption spectrum based on bandgap renormalization effects (line broadening and redshift). (b) Bandgap renormalization induced absorption difference versus Pauli blocking. (c) Transient absorption spectrum.

It is worth pointing out that the distinct signatures obtained from degenerate and non-degenerate measurements (e.g. Fig. 2b, refs 16 and 24) may be as a result of different sensitivity to the Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization effects. The degenerate measurements more closely represent the behaviour of a two-level model depicting saturable absorption at the probe wavelength. However, the optical response from the non-degenerate experiments actually probed a combined effect of Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization, since they involve both excited states and carrier relaxation pathways24. To provide further insights into the competition mechanism between these two effects, we performed pump fluence-dependent non-degenerate measurements on sample Arc-w/o-CMC. As shown in Figs 5 and S4, at a critical wavelength (e.g. ~2.1 µm), we observe a non-trivial delay time-dependent PA-PB transition, i.e. the signal is negative (PA) immediately after pump excitation and flips to positive (PB) within about 1 ps. At slight shorter wavelength (~2.0 µm), only PB signal is detected, whereas at slight longer wavelength (2.2 µm), PA can completely override the weak PB signal. The change of transient dynamics as shown in Fig. 5 provides direct evidence for the existence of competition between Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization effects. In Fig. S5, we summarize the peak value of PA and PB extracted from the transient dynamics for a probe wavelength at 2.1 µm (Fig. 5b). The peak value of PA signal is seen to linearly increase with the increasing of pump fluence, while the PB signal readily saturates at a moderate pump fluence ~600 µJ/cm2. Such features indicate that the comparative weight between Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization is highly dependent on pump fluences, which should be used as an important control parameter in interpreting the ultrafast dynamics of SWNTs. It should be pointed out that although we have demonstrated the competition between Pauli blocking and bandgap renormalization effects, the hot-optical phonon bath build-up signature is not directly observed in our measurements. This is probably due to the limited temporal resolution of our current setup (~300 fs).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The pump fluence-dependent non-degenerate results for sample Arc-w/o-CMC with three selected probe wavelengths (a) 2.0 μm, (b) 2.1 μm, and (c) 2.2 μm. Form bottom to top, the pump fluences are 0.13, 0.3, 0.62, 1.05 and 1.7 mJ/cm2, respectively.

In summary, we have performed broadband (1–2.4 µm) pump-probe measurements on SWNTs of different chiralities and morphologies with both degenerate and non-degenerate configurations. Two common optical switching features are obtained, where photo-bleaching is found at excitonic transitions and a photoinduced absorption band tends to form at the red-side of exciton resonance. More importantly, these results have been well accounted for by considering bandgap renormalization effects, caused by the electron-hot optical phonon coupling. Our work provides a simple physical model to interpret the broadband transient optical response of carbon nanotubes.

Methods

SWNT sample preparation

Raw SWNT powers were initially dispersed in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) by an ultrasonic degradation. Then, the dispersions were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 1 hour to remove large SWNT bundles. Sample Arc-w/o-CMC was subsequently fabricated on silica substrate by dip coating followed by an overnight bake at 60 °C, while for samples Arc-CMC and HiPco-CMC, the supernatants were mixed with Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and the film samples were finally synthesized by gradually evaporating the solvent for several days.

Pump-probe measurement

An 800 nm, 1 kHz Ti: Sapphire amplifier (Libra, Coherent Inc.) was used as laser source. The 400 nm pulses were obtained by frequency doubling in a β-Barium Borate (BBO) nonlinear crystal, and the infrared (1–2.4 μm) pulses were generated by feed a portion of 800 nm pulses into an optical parametric amplifier system (OPA-SOLO, Coherent Inc.). Both degenerate and non-degenerate pump–probe setup was based on a transmission geometry. The pump pulses passed through a 334 Hz chopper so that we could record pump-induced differential transmission changes ΔT/T 0 by the lock-in amplifying technique. For all the measurements, the used pump fluence was about 300 μJ/cm2 unless specified otherwise. The time resolution of our setup was about 300 fs, and the relaxation time constants were extracted by a mono-exponential decay function fitting. All of the measurements were performed at room temperature and ambient environment.

Data availability

All important data supporting the findings of this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files). Further data sets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information (179.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0206304), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB921101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61378025, 61450110087, 61427812, 61504056, 51522201, 11474006), the Jiangsu Province Shuangchuang Team program, and the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems Networks, China.

Author Contributions

F.W. conceived the project and together with R.Z. supervised the project. Y.J.L., prepared the samples. C.Z. and J.X. performed pump-probe experiments. Z.N. carried out the linear absorption spectroscopy measurements. Y.L. and Y.X. contributed to the analysis of the experimental results. All authors contributed to discussion and preparation of the manuscript and gave their approval to the final version.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11767-z

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Avouris P, Freitag M, Perebeinos V. Carbon-nanotube photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics. 2008;2:341–350. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2008.94. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Volder MFL, Tawfick S, Baughman RH, Hart AJ. Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science. 2013;339:535–539. doi: 10.1126/science.1222453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hasan T, et al. Nanotube-polymer composites for ultrafast photonics. Adv. Mater. 2009;21:3874–3899. doi: 10.1002/adma.200901122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martinez A, Sun Z. Nanotube and graphene saturable absorbers for fibre lasers. Nat. Photonics. 2013;7:842–845. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Habisreutinger SN, et al. Carbon nanotube/polymer composites as a highly stable hole collection layer in perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 2014;14:5561–5568. doi: 10.1021/nl501982b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang D, et al. Transparent, conductive, and flexible carbon nanotube films and their application in organic light-emitting diodes. Nano Lett. 2006;6:1880–1886. doi: 10.1021/nl0608543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu Y, et al. Planar carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid films for high-performance broadband photodetectors. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8589. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mehlenbacher RD, et al. Photoexcitation dynamics of coupled semiconducting carbon nanotube thin films. Nano Lett. 2013;13:1495–1501. doi: 10.1021/nl304591w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ponzoni S, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. Hybridized C-O-Si interface states at the origin of efficiency improvement in CNT/Si solar cells; pp. 16627–16634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Going R, et al. 500 fs wideband tunable fiber laser mode-locked by nanotubes. Physica E. 2012;44:1078–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2012.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari AC. Ultrafast lasers mode-locked by nanotubes and graphene. Physica E. 2012;44:1082–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2012.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meng Y, Li Y, Xu Y, Wang F. Carbon nanotube mode-locked thulium fiber laser With 200 nm tuning range. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45109. doi: 10.1038/srep45109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen Y-C, et al. Ultrafast optical switching properties of single-wall carbon nanotube polymer composites at 1.55 μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002;81:975–977. doi: 10.1063/1.1498007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hertel T, Moos G. Electron-phonon interaction in single-wall carbon nanotubes: a time-domain study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000;84:5002–5005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lauret J-S, et al. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;90:057404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.057404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Korovyanko OJ, et al. Ultrafast spectroscopy of excitons in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92:017403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.017403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang L, Pedrosa HN, Krauss TD. Ultrafast ground-state recovery of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93:017403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.017403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ostojic GN, et al. Stability of high-density one-dimensional excitons in carbon nanotubes under high laser excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:097401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.097401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhu Z, et al. Pump-probe spectroscopy of exciton dynamics in (6, 5) carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007;111:3831–3835. doi: 10.1021/jp0669411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lüer L, et al. Size and mobility of excitons in (6, 5) carbon nanotubes. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:54–58. doi: 10.1038/nphys1149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lüer L, et al. Ultrafast dynamics in metallic and semiconducting carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;80:205411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.205411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang J, Graham MW, Ma Y, Fleming GR, Kaindl RA. Ultrafast spectroscopy of midinfrared internal exciton transitions in separated single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:177401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.177401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stich D, et al. Triplet-triplet exciton dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Photonics. 2014;8:139–144. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu S, et al. Ultrafast nonlinear photoresponse of single-wall carbon nanotubes: a broadband degenerate investigation. Nanoscale. 2016;8:9304–9309. doi: 10.1039/C6NR00652C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Soavi G, Scotognella F, Lanzani G, Cerullo G. Ultrafast photophysics of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016;4:1670–1688. doi: 10.1002/adom.201600361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O’Connell MJ, et al. Band gap fluorescence from individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science. 2002;297:593–596. doi: 10.1126/science.1072631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang F, Dukovic G, Brus LE, Heinz TF. The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons. Science. 2005;308:838–841. doi: 10.1126/science.1110265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jorio, A., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Carbon Nanotubes, (Springer Verlag, 2008).
  • 29.Giustino F, Louie SG, Cohen ML. Electron-phonon renormalization of the direct band gap of diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:265501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.265501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cannuccia E, Marini A. Effect of the quantum zero-point atomic motion on the optical and electronic properties of diamond and trans-polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:255501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.255501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Allen PB, Heine V. Theory of the temperature dependence of electronic band structures. J. Phys. C. 1976;9:2305. doi: 10.1088/0022-3719/9/12/013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cardona M. Electron–phonon interaction in tetrahedral semiconductors. Solid State Commun. 2005;133:3. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.10.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marini A. Ab initio finite-temperature excitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;101:106405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.106405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steinhoff A, Rösner M, Jahnke F, Wehling TO, Gies C. Influence of excited carriers on the optical and electronic properties of MoS2. Nano Lett. 2014;14:3743–3748. doi: 10.1021/nl500595u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chernikov A, Ruppert C, Hill HM, Rigosi AF, Heinz TF. Population inversion and giant bandgap renormalization in atomically thin WS2 layers. Nat. Photonics. 2015;9:466–470. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pogna EAA, et al. Photo-induced bandgap renormalization governs the ultrafast response of single-layer MoS2. ACS Nano. 2016;10:1182–1188. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b06488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y, et al. Charge transfer at carbon nanotube–graphene van der Waals heterojunctions. Nanoscale. 2016;8:12883–12883. doi: 10.1039/C6NR03965K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu Y, et al. Graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid films for high-performance flexible photodetectors. Nano Research. 2017;10:1880. doi: 10.1007/s12274-016-1370-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kataura H, et al. Optical properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Synth. Met. 1999;103:2555–2558. doi: 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)00278-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pedersen TG, Pedersen K. Stability and signatures of biexcitons in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2005;5:291–294. doi: 10.1021/nl048108q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Styers-Barnett DJ, et al. Exciton dynamics and biexciton formation in single-walled carbon nanotubes studied with femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112:4507–4516. doi: 10.1021/jp7099256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gao B, Hartland GV, Huang L. Transient absorption spectroscopy and imaging of individual chirality-assigned single-walled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano. 2012;6:5083–5090. doi: 10.1021/nn300753a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Soavi G, et al. Ultrafast charge photogeneration in semiconducting carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:10849–10855. doi: 10.1021/jp404009z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Crochet JJ, et al. Free-carrier generation in aggregates of single-wall carbon nanotubes by photoexcitation in the ultraviolet regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:257402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.257402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Soavi G, et al. High energetic excitons in carbon nanotubes directly probe charge-carriers. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:9681. doi: 10.1038/srep09681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin H, et al. Many-body effects in electronic bandgaps of carbon nanotubes measured by scanning tunnelling spectroscopy. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:235–238. doi: 10.1038/nmat2771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu K, et al. An atlas of carbon nanotube optical transitions. Nat. Nanotech. 2012;7:325–329. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haug, H. & Koch, S. W. Quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties of semiconductors, (World Scientific, 2009).
  • 49.Fantini C, et al. Optical transition energies for carbon nanotubes from resonant Raman spectroscopy: environment and temperature effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93:147406. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.147406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Perebeinos V, Tersoff J, Avouris P. Electron-phonon interaction and transport in semiconducting carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:086802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.086802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cronin SB, et al. Temperature dependence of the optical transition energies of carbon nanotubes: the role of electron-phonon coupling and thermal expansion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:127403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.127403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu Y, et al. Variable electron-phonon coupling in isolated metallic carbon nanotubes observed by Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99:027402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.027402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Freitag M, et al. Hot carrier electroluminescence from a single carbon nanotube. Nano Lett. 2004;4:1063–1066. doi: 10.1021/nl049607u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Manzoni C, et al. Intersubband exciton relaxation dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:207401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.207401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nesbitt JM, Smith DC. Measurements of the population lifetime of D band and G′ band phonons in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2013;13:416–422. doi: 10.1021/nl303569n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Song D, et al. Direct measurement of the lifetime of optical phonons in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100:225503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.225503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kang K, Ozel T, Cahill DG, Shim M. Optical phonon lifetimes in single-walled carbon nanotubes by time-resolved raman scattering. Nano Lett. 2008;8:4642–4647. doi: 10.1021/nl802447a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ong Z-Y, Pop E, Shiomi J. Phonon-interface scattering in multilayer graphene on an amorphous support. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:165418. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (179.5KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

All important data supporting the findings of this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files). Further data sets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES