Abstract
Chloroma refers to the extramedullary proliferation of immature myeloid precursors occurring in a gamut of myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic conditions; acute myeloid leukaemia being the commonest. With non-specific clinical and imaging manifestations, it runs a high risk of misdiagnosis which may significantly affect the outcome of an otherwise treatable lesion. Also with these lesions heralding impending blast crises, awareness of the imaging findings becomes imperative. Imaging not only helps raise the suspicion but also guides further confirmation by demonstration of specific immunohistochemistry markers, ensuring timely institution of chemotherapy. In general, solid enhancing lesions in any haematological disorder could be chloromas, especially if multifocal with mass effect.
INTRODUCTION
Chloroma is a solid tumour composed of mass-like extramedullary proliferation of primitive cells of myeloid lineage causing effacement of the native tissue architecture. The first case of chloroma was observed by a British physician Burns1 in 1811 in his observations on the surgical anatomy of the head and neck. Later in 1853, King2 coined the term “chloroma” as the tumour was frequently of greenish hue due to the presence of myeloperoxidase enzyme. However, it was noted that up to one-third of these tumours can be white or grey. Hence, Rappaport3 proposed the term granulocytic which is preferred and used interchangeably with chloroma.4
Chloroma may develop at any age. However, nearly 60% of cases are seen in children less than 15 years of age with no specific gender predilection. It is a rare manifestation of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with a reported incidence of 2.5–9%. Occasionally, it may be seen in other myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic conditions such as myeloid metaplasia, polycythemia vera, hypereosinophilic syndrome or essential thrombocytosis. Rare case reports suggest its occurrence in lymphoid leukaemia also.5–8
Chronology of occurrence of chloroma in myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic disorder is variable; accordingly, the following patterns may be seen (Audouin et al9):
(a) Concurrent with AML: commonest, manifesting at the time of initial presentation or any time during the active phase of AML.
(b) Relapse: presenting months to years later in AML remission, especially in recipients of Bone Marrow transplant. Chloroma developing during remission is considered as systemic disease despite normal blood counts and marrow findings.
(c) Precursor of blast phase transformation: in non-leukaemic myeloproliferative conditions, heralding blast crisis and subsequent AML transformation.
(d) Primary chloroma: a rare non-leukaemic form, occurring in otherwise healthy population in the absence of marrow abnormality. Primary chloroma precedes any haematological abnormality in nearly 35% of cases. Usually undergoes leukaemic transformation in months to years, average interval being 10 months.
Certain risk factors which increase the likelihood of developing chloroma in AML include M4 or M5 (French–American–British classification), myeloblasts-expressing specific T-cell markers CD13 and CD14, high peripheral total leukocyte count and certain chromosomal abnormalities t(8;21) or inv(16). On the contrary, chloroma in AML relapse may be due to certain biological peculiarities of leukaemic blasts cells such as molecular expression of markers responsible for increased tissue infiltration (CD87) and adhesion (CD56 and CD138). Frequent predilection of these lesions for certain sites propounds the hypothesis of suboptimal response to chemotherapy or graft-vs-leukaemia response.
Most common sites of chloroma are the bone and periosteum which is explained by the direct spread from the adjoining infiltrated marrow. Other frequently involved sites are skin (leukaemia cutis), lymph nodes and orbit, although any site may be potentially affected. Chloroma has high propensity for recurrence with varying spatial and temporal distribution.4–11
DIAGNOSTIC MODALITIES
Chloroma usually remains asymptomatic (approximately 50%) or may have non-specific manifestations pertaining to the mass effect, organ dysfunction or pain at the involved site. Cross-sectional imaging is indispensable to delineate the sites and extent of involvement besides characterizing these lesions. The role of plain radiography is restricted to the evaluation of skeletal manifestations and preliminary evaluation of lung lesions or bowel obstruction. Ultrasound is expedient for assessing superficial structures such as skin, testis or during the follow-up of abdominal lesions.
Chloroma is a soft-tissue tumour which may be either circumscribed or diffusely infiltrating. CT findings are variable, which to some extent depend on the site of involvement. Usually craniospinal lesions are hyperdense on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and show intense homogeneous enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). On the contrary, lesions in the abdominal viscera and orbit are frequently hypodense and mildly enhancing. MRI is helpful for evaluation of craniospinal and musculoskeletal involvement, especially in indeterminate cases. On MRI, it is iso-/hypointense on T1 and mildly hyperintense on T2 weighted images. MRI is also apt in follow-up imaging due to the lack of radiation concerns. Nuclear imaging such as fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and gallium-67 is of value to look for multiplicity and response evaluation after chemotherapy. On 18F-FDG-PET/CT and gallium-67 scans, chloroma shows avid uptake. 18F-FDG-PET is imperative in radiotherapy planning. Despite all these imaging modalities, findings on sonography, CT, MRI or 18F-FDG-PET remain generic, being indistinguishable from other malignancies and is frequently mistaken for lymphoma, a much commoner haematological malignancy.8,9
Diagnostic confirmation of chloroma is essentially established on immunohistochemistry (IHC) by demonstration of monoclonal antibodies against certain specific surface antigens. Most widely expressed markers are CD43, CD 68 and lysozyme. As per the World Health Organization classification (2008), specific cytochemical stains for diagnosing chloroma should include chloroacetate esterase, myeloperoxidase and non-specific esterase. A horde of other markers which may be expressed include CD4, CD33, CD34, CD56, CD117 or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase depending on the lineage and maturation of myeloid cells. There is a high likelihood of misdiagnosis on pathology, in as high as 47% of cases for the lack of specific IHC markers application, if chloroma is not suspected pre-emptively on imaging, especially in the non-leukaemic form.8–11
TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS
Owing to its rarity, there is limited availability of data to establish the exact bearing of chloroma in the prognosis of leukaemia or other myeloproliferative conditions. In AML, prognosis largely remains unchanged; however, studies do suggest refractoriness to therapy and increased likelihood of relapse. On the contrary, primary myeloid sarcoma or chloroma in AML remission is labelled as systemic disease and treated on the lines of leukaemia even with normal peripheral leukocyte counts or Bone Marrow (BM). Similarly, chloroma in various other myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic conditions suggests leukaemic transformation and warrants systemic anti-leukaemic chemotherapy. Localized treatment such as surgery or radiotherapy is highly effective in relieving compressive symptoms particularly in spinal chloroma and may provide immediate survival benefits in some cases; however, overall survival or prognosis remains unaffected and is determined by the systemic disease.12,13
On an average, the median survival after the diagnosis of chloroma is 7.5 months. Prognosis is unfazed by the age, gender or the underlying myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic condition. By and large, prognosis is independent of the site of involvement; however, lesions at uncommon sites may prove detrimental primarily due to delayed recognition, although the lesions may not necessarily be more aggressive than their counterparts elsewhere.12–14
A recent surge in the incidence of chloroma is likely due to prolonged longevity in leukaemia consequent upon the availability of newer treatment options (e.g. allogenic Bone Marrow transplantation, repeated donor lymphocyte infusion, second transplantation). Nevertheless, diagnosing chloroma, especially the non-leukaemic form, is quite challenging and is essentially a holistic approach involving clinical, laboratory and imaging findings. Radiologists are often the standard bearer in arriving at the diagnosis by raising its suspicion on imaging which guides the haematopathologist to execute flow cytometry, IHC and immunophenotyping accordingly. For the impact on prognosis and overall survival, radiologists should be aware of the possible imaging manifestations, potential sites of involvement particularly in known haematological malignancy to alarm its suspicion, facilitating early diagnosis which may alter the management and halt further disease progression. Few series have also reported a lower rate of leukaemic transformation if primary MS is recognized and treated timely. Despite aggressive and extensive involvement, these lesions are highly responsive to induction chemotherapy; furthermore, stressing the need of timely recognition.7
A systemic review of imaging findings in chloroma is presented here (Table 1) along with site-specific common differential considerations.
Table 1.
Site | Pattern of involvement |
---|---|
CNS | Extra-axial: dura, periosteum, lepto-/pachymeninges (leukaemic meningitis) |
Intra-axial: nodules or masses (rare) | |
Spine | Epidural: intra-/extraspinal (commonest) |
Thecal sac/nerve root thickening | |
Intramedullary (rare) | |
Neck | Involvement of any neck space |
Transcompartmental spread ± | |
Orbit | Extraconal (common) |
Bony orbit/periosteum | |
Extra-ocular muscles | |
Optic nerve | |
Intraconal | |
Intra-ocular (sclera/choroid/retina) | |
Thorax | Mediastinum |
Any compartment may be involved | |
Trans-compartmental spread ± | |
Lung | |
Alveolar involvement: nodules, masses | |
Interstitial involvement: septal thickening | |
Pleura and pericardium | |
Nodules | |
Effusion | |
Hepatobiliary | Discrete masses (solitary/multiple) |
Peribiliary chloroma | |
Gastrointestinal | Nodule, polyp, ulcer, diffuse segmental thickening of the involved bowel |
Peritoneal, omental deposits ± | |
Mesenteric lymphadenopathy/ascites | |
Genitourinary tract | MC site in |
Male: testis and adnexa | |
Female: ovary | |
Breast | Solitary or multiple masses |
Muscles | Primary or secondary to contiguous spread from the adjacent bone |
MC site: pelvic muscles | |
Skin, lymph node | Skin: papulonodular eruptions (leukaemia cutis) |
Lymph node: solitary or multiple lymphadenopathy; may be discrete or conglomerate | |
Bone | MC site of involvement |
Lytic or mixed lytic–sclerotic lesion |
CNS, central nervous system; MC, most common.
Central nervous system
Intracranial
Central nervous system (CNS) chloroma is postulated to originate secondary to the calvarial marrow infiltration with subsequent transgression of leukaemic infiltrates through the haversian canal and further extramedullary proliferation in the subperiosteum. This accounts for the frequent epidural location of these lesions, in concordance with the calvarial proximity. Subarachnoid space involvement is believed to result from the perivenular arachnoid spread of leukaemic infiltrates along the dural or subarachnoid veins. Intracranial chloroma is further categorized into intra- or extra-axial depending upon its location.5,7,8,15–19
Extra-axial
Epidural/subdural deposits (Figure 1) may be discrete or contiguous and usually propogate along the cerebral venous sinus with propensity for causing venous infarction.
Meningeal involvement (Figure 2): plaque-like involvement of lepto- or pachymeninges also called carcinomatosis or leukaemic meningitis. Ependymal spread may lead to intraventricular deposits.
Intra-axial
Intra-axial chloroma is extremely rare (Figure 3) and is usually due to parenchymal invasion by the extra-axial deposits following breach of the pia–glial membrane. Rarely, it may be primary intra-axial in the form of circumscribed masses with occasional intralesional haemorrhage and disproportionate perilesional oedema causing mass effect. There is no specific lobar predilection.
On NCCT, cranial chloroma is usually hyperdense solid masses of soft-tissue attenuation which is attributed to the compact cellular packing. On MRI, these lesions are usually iso-/hypointense to grey matter on T1 and is likely due the presence of myeloperoxidase enzyme. On T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), lesions are mildly hyperintense. Usually, these lesions show intense homogeneous enhancement. Rarely, ring enhancement may be encountered especially in larger lesions or during treatment which is due to the central necrosis. Ancillary features may include bone erosion and venous sinus thrombosis. Although tissue sampling is required for diagnostic confirmation, which may be obviated in a known myeloproliferative disorder with these classical imaging findings, and is reserved only for indeterminate cases.
A rare but essential contemplation in CNS chloroma is the subdural deposits with its clinical and imaging findings being strikingly similar to the subdural haematoma (SDH); latter being relatively common due to coagulopathy in haematological malignancies. Furthermore, concomitant occurrence of subdural deposits with SDH fuels the complexity which needs to be distinguished for their antipodal management (Figure 4). SDH requires surgical drainage, whereas subdural chloroma is managed conservatively with systemic chemotherapy and adjunctive radiotherapy; surgery is rarely required in CNS chloroma to relieve mass effect. Contrast study [CECT/contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI)] is invaluable in this distinction as subdural deposits are intensely enhancing as opposed to SDH which lacks enhancement.20,21
Spine
Similar to cranial chloroma, spinal involvement is usually secondary to the leukaemic marrow infiltration with further transgression of myeloid cells through the haversian canal in the extra-osseous location. Accordingly, chloroma of the spine is usually extramedullary in location, commonly epidural and is either within the spinal canal or may track along the nerve roots in the paraspinal location (Figures 5–7). Pre-/paravertebral chloroma may also be due to the spread from retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Intramedullary chloroma of the cord is extremely rare (Figure 8).
Spinal chloroma frequently leads to compressive myelopathy/neuronopathy regardless of the site of involvement. MRI is the modality of choice for evaluation of spinal deposits. It presents as multiple extramedullary masses which may be either contiguous or discrete involving different vertebral levels. These deposits are usually isointense on T1, intermediate on T2 and show homogeneous enhancement. Furthermore, there is diffuse leukaemic infiltration of the vertebral marrow. Combined intra-extraspinal form of chloroma may mimic nerve sheath tumour on imaging; however, lack of profound T2 hyperintensity with no secondary bony changes (destruction or remodelling) favours chloroma. Accurate and timely diagnosis of chloroma is imperative as local control of the disease with focused radiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy helps in relieving cord compression besides obviating unnecessary surgery. Such directed therapies improve the quality of life with immediate survival benefits, although overall prognosis remains bleak.5,7–11,22–24
Head and neck
Orbit is the commonest site to be involved in the head and neck region. Prevalence of orbital chloroma is higher in children than in adults. Orbital involvement may be uni- or bilateral and may result in proptosis, venous congestion or blindness. Virtually, any structure of the orbit whether intra- or extraconal may be affected (Figure 9); the commonest site being the subperiosteum of the roof of the orbit. Rarely, optic nerve deposits may occur especially during the leukaemic relapse as the retrobulbar optic nerve is a sanctuary site for the leukaemic infiltrates due to suboptimal penetration of the chemotherapy drugs.
On NCCT, orbital chloroma is usually iso-/hypodense with mild homogeneous enhancement. It molds along the bony contour without causing its destruction; however, the medial orbital wall remains an exception through which it contiguously extends into the paranasal sinus. Nonetheless, with extensive disease, orbital chloroma may spread to the paranasal sinuses and vice versa with resultant cortical destruction and periosteal reaction (spiculated or “hair on end”).
Intra-ocular chloroma may involve various coats of the eyeball such as the sclera, uvea or retina. On CT, due to poor contrast resolution, differentiation of these deposits from the adjoining normal tissue may be difficult which is essential if surgical debulking is planned. MRI is of paramount utility in such cases, especially to delineate scleral involvement for the relative iso-/hyperintense signal intensity of these lesions as against the hypointense sclera.
Paranasal sinus involvement may vary from mucoperiosteal thickening, focal circumscribed masses or opacification of the entire sinus with bone destruction in advanced stages. Other sites to be involved in the head and neck region include mucosa of the lips, gingiva, nose and skin (Figure 10). Cervical involvement frequently manifests as lymphadenopathy which may be discrete or conglomerate. Occasionally, there may be infiltrating mass-like deposit lacking compartmental localization. Owing to the superficial location, these deposits are usually detected early. However, if undiagnosed, it may further spread to adjacent structures such the orbit or paranasal sinuses. Orbital and neck chloroma are highly liable to intracranial extension through the skull base foramina.5,7,11,25,26
Thorax
Intrathoracic chloroma is an infrequent site, and of the various potential sites, mediastinum is the commonest to be affected (Figures 11 and 12).
Mediastinum
Mediastinal chloroma can be in the form of discrete masses or more commonly as diffusely infiltrating soft tissue which may have transcompartmental involvement and is frequently mistaken for lymphoma on imaging. Symptoms result from compression of various mediastinal structures. Cardiac chloroma is an extremely rare entity which may involve any cardiac chamber or valve.5,7,9
Lung
Lung chloroma is extremely rare and may involve interstitium or alveoli. The various morphological patterns include consolidation, nodules, masses (solitary or multiple) or interstitial thickening. Lung involvement usually manifests as interstitial thickening which is indistinguishable from interstitial pneumonitis or fluid overload. Consolidation and masses are extremely rare. In the early stages, air bronchogram may be present; however, in advanced disease, large masses may compress the lung parenchyma with frequent pleural and mediastinal involvement.
Nodules may undergo cavitation with surrounding ground-glass attenuation giving rise to the classical “reversed halo sign” on CT, making it virtually indistinguishable from the fungal infection. Although exceptional, radiologists should be aware of the possibility of chloroma and offer tissue sampling, especially in the wake of non-resolving or progressive disease, despite antifungal treatment. Interstitial involvement leads to septal thickening which may be smooth or nodular. Lung chloroma, in general, has dismal prognosis despite intensive chemotherapy, perhaps due to its late recognition.5,7,27,28
Pleura and pericardium
Pleural or pericardial deposits may be nodular or plaque-like and usually result in concomitant effusion.5,7
Abdomen
Hepatobiliary
Myeloid cells may infiltrate hepatic sinusoids or peribiliary venous plexus resulting in circumscribed lesions or periportal infiltration also referred as “peribiliary chloroma” (Figure 13). On CT, these nodules are usually hypodense with mild or no contrast enhancement. These nodules mimic infection/abscess or more commonly lymphoma. Unlike lymphoma which lacks mass effect, myeloid deposits commonly lead to obstructive jaundice. Obstructive jaundice resulting from peribiliary chloroma usually proves detrimental for its frequent ascription to cholangitis or adverse effect of chemotherapy.
Although pancreatic chloroma is extremely rare, pancreatic head deposit may lead to obstructive jaundice. Similar to hepatic deposits, these lesions are iso- or hypodense on CT with mild enhancement, making it indistinguishable from pancreatic adenocarcinoma or lymphoma on imaging.6,11,15
Gastrointestinal tract (bowel, omentum and peritoneum)
Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) chloroma is extremely rare and is believed to stem from haematopoietic cell rests. It frequently leads to calamitous manifestations such as bowel necrosis, obstruction, perforation or torrential haemorrhage, unlike their counterparts elsewhere. Analogous to bowel lymphoma, the small intestine is the commonest site to be involved (Figures 14 and 15). Isolated involvement of colon or rectum is even rarer and is usually secondary to the peritoneal involvement. Morphologically, different patterns of GIT chloroma include nodules (solitary/multiple), polyps, ulceration or segmental mural thickening resembling a stricture. Bowel chloroma has a high tendency for extraluminal spread into the mesentery or omentum. In advanced cases, there may be peritoneal involvement which resembles peritoneal carcinomatosis or lymphomatosis on imaging.
Of the abdominal viscera, the spleen is the commonest site to be involved followed by the liver. However, whether or not splenic involvement is considered extramedullary, relapse remains controversial as many authors propound the spleen to be a medullary organ.5,7–11,15
Genitourinary tract
Although rare, any part of the genitourinary tract may be involved. Of the reproductive and urinary tract, the former is more commonly involved.
Urinary tract
Similar to GIT, chloroma of the genitourinary tract is also postulated to originate from the haematopoietic cell rests. According to the site of involvement, urinary tract chloroma may manifest with abdominal pain, haematuria or hydronephrosis.
Ante-mortem diagnosis of non-leukaemic renal chloroma is extremely unusual. Renal involvement is usually diffusely infiltrating resulting in nephromegaly with variable extension to the perinephric space. Pelvicalyceal or ureteric involvement may be suggested by plaque-like mucosal thickening which is indistinguishable from transitional cell carcinoma. Urinary bladder chloroma usually results in mural thickening which may be focal or diffuse.
Reproductive tract
In females, chloroma commonly involves the ovary. Ovarian chloroma may have different morphological patterns varying from solid and homogeneously enhancing to solid–cystic or, less commonly, multiseptated. Although less common, there may be involvement of the uterus and cervix. Vagina and vulval deposits are extremely rare.
In the male reproductive tract, the testis is the commonest site to be affected, and being a sanctuary site for leukaemic infiltrates, testicular deposits may be the first manifestation of relapse. Like elsewhere, myeloid deposits may be either diffusely infiltrating or circumscribed masses resulting in testicular enlargement (Figure 16). Ancillary features include involvement of the epididymis and hydrocele.5,7,11
Retroperitoneum
Retroperitoneal chloroma stems from prevertebral/paraspinal deposits continuous with vertebral marrow infiltration or from involvement of lymph nodes. For its frequent asymptomatic occurrence, retroperitoneal masses tend to be large at presentation.
These deposits are either poorly marginated conglomerate lobulated masses (Figure 17) encasing the kidneys or ureters with variable infiltration into the paraspinal muscles or extension to the neural foramina. Less commonly, chloroma may deposit as plaque-like soft tissue which is indistinguishable from the retroperitoneal fibrosis on imaging. As elsewhere, retroperitoneal masses resemble lymphoma on imaging but the presence of compressive symptoms with leukaemic background suggests its diagnosis.5,11
Musculoskeletal system
Bone
The bone is the commonest site of extramedullary deposits particularly during leukaemic relapse. The axial skeleton is preferentially involved due to the persistence of haematopoietic marrow. In the appendicular skeleton, there is predilection for the involvement of the metadiaphyseal region. Radiographically, these lesions are commonly lytic with permeative bone destruction (Figure 18). Mixed-lytic sclerotic form has also been reported. There is proclivity for further ligamentous and periosteal spread consequent on the transgression of myeloid cells through the haversian canal. If unhalted, there may be infiltration into the surrounding muscles. MRI findings are non-specific; lesion is usually hypo-/isointense on T1 and mildly hyperintense on T2WI with intense enhancement. Diagnostic certainty rises if it is isointense on both T1 and T2, making imaging distinction possible from other common bone lesions such as lymphoma, bone tumours or osteomyelitis which have higher signal intensity on T2WI.5,7,29
Muscle
Muscle deposits may be either primary or secondary to the involvement of the adjacent bone. Myeloid cells diffusely infiltrate the muscle causing enlargement. Of the various muscle groups, pelvic muscles are the most frequently affected. These deposits are isodense to the adjacent muscle on NCCT and show intense enhancement (Figure 19). There may be involvement of adjacent bone causing cortical erosion. On MRI, these lesions are isointense on T1 and mildly T2 hyperintense with intense enhancement.5,7
Subcutaneous tissue
Skin
Skin chloroma also called “leukaemia cutis” is fairly common, with reported incidence of 20–50%. It usually manifests as firm papulonodular lesions which may be solitary or multiple. These lesions may be painful and hence mistaken for abscesses or fat necrosis, especially in the background of immunosuppression.5,7
Breast
Breast chloroma, although unusual, is relatively common in adult females. Lesions may be solitary or multiple with involvement of single or bilateral breasts (Figure 20). These masses lack calcification and may have either circumscribed or more frequently spiculated margins, making them indistinguishable from carcinoma on imaging. On ultrasound, it is hypoechoic and intensely enhancing on CECT or CEMRI. Imaging findings are indistinguishable from other breast malignancies such as carcinoma, lymphoma and metastasis7–9
Differential diagnosis
Few site-specific common differential considerations are enlisted (Table 2) which may mimic chloroma on imaging. These lesions have relatively common occurrence compared with chloroma and are frequently mistaken as second malignancy even in known cases of AML. Nevertheless, chloroma should always be suspected in masses with unusual imaging features (Figure 21). The key to correct interpretation is corroboration with clinical and Bone Marrow findings to accordingly direct the pathologist for diagnostic confirmation.
Table 2.
Site | Imaging appearance of chloroma | Differential diagnosis | Distinguishing feature to suggest chloroma |
---|---|---|---|
(1) (a) Intracranial (extra-axial) |
Hyperdense mass on NCCT MRI: T1-hypo/isointense T2-isointense/mildly hyperintense Marked and intense contrast enhancement |
Lymphoma Meningioma Metastasis (neuroblastoma, Ewing's Sarcoma) Haematoma |
–Usually bone destruction not a feature –Absence of bony hyperostosis and calcification, usually lack dural tail (c.f. meningioma) –High propensity for superficial venous sinus infiltration –Presence of enhancement (c.f. haematoma) |
(b) Leptomeningeal involvement | Patchy or continuous meningeal enhancement | Non-neoplastic: infective, sarcoid Neoplastic: primary meningeal infiltration by lymphoma and metastasis |
–Meningeal infiltration usually contiguous with dural forms –Leptomenigeal thickening may be hyperdense on NCCT |
(2) Spine | Marrow infiltration with multiple extramedullary masses which are T1-isointense T2–intermediate signal intensity Homogeneous enhancement |
Lymphoma Multiple myeloma EMH Metastasis nerve sheath tumour |
–Lack of demonstrable fat (c.f. extra medullary haematopoiesis) –Intermediate T2 signal intensity (c.f. T2 hyperintensity in nerve sheath tumour) |
(3) Orbit | Enhancing soft-tissue masses, may affect any orbital component MC site: subperiosteum |
Haemangioma/lymphovenous malformation Rhabdomyosarcoma Ewing's sarcoma Lymphoma Neuroblastoma |
Moulds along the confines of bony orbit, bone destruction usually lacking |
(4) Hepatobiliary | Hypovascular nodules (solitary/multiple) Peribiliary chloroma |
Lymphoma Abscess (cholangitis) Granulomatous disease (tuberculosis, sarcoid) |
Compressive symptoms present (c.f. lymphoma) |
(5) Gastrointestinal | Bowel involvement may be nodular, polypoidal, diffuse thickening Ancillary features: Lymphadenopathy, peritoneal and omental deposits, ascites |
Lymphoma Adenocarcinoma |
May have bowel obstruction (c.f. lymphoma) |
(6) Skeletal | Lytic Mixed lytic-sclerotic |
Lymphoma Histiocytic disorders Metastasis (neuroblastoma) Multiple myeloma/plasmacytoma Osteomyelitis |
– |
(7) Muscle | Isodense/isointense to muscle Homogeneous enhancement |
Haematoma, myositis, focal nodular myositis, lymphoma | Homogeneous enhancement (c.f. hematoma, abscess) |
c.f., refer; EMH, extramedullary haematopoiesis; MC, most common; NCCT, non-contrast CT.
CONCLUSION
Chloroma, classically described in AML, may be seen in a horde of myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic conditions with non-specific clinical manifestations and imaging findings; diagnosing chloroma poses a challenge especially in the initial stages.
Exact prognostic implication of chloroma in AML remains uncertain, and the overall survival may remain unaffected; however, there may be increased refractoriness to treatment. Chloroma occurring in myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic conditions herald the onset of blast crisis, whereas primary myeloid sarcoma suggests an imminent leukaemic transformation. Irrespective of the site or Bone Marrow status, chloroma is treated by systemic chemotherapy. Localized treatment such as focused radiotherapy or surgery is performed at selected sites to relieve compressive symptoms. Radiologists play the central role in its management, hence familiarity with imaging features of chloroma is imperative to eye a suspicion for redirecting specific histopathological studies besides performing guided tissue sampling and obviating unnecessary surgery. Nonetheless, diagnosing chloroma is a holistic approach, taking into consideration the clinical background, imaging findings and eventual confirmation by IHC. Prompt and precise diagnosis is the key to successful management, as failure to institute treatment early leads to an inexorably aggressive downhill course with rapid mortality.
Contributor Information
Anuradha Singh, Email: anuradha.lhmc@gmail.com.
Pawan Kumar, Email: 0141pawan@gmail.com.
Atin Kumar, Email: dratinkumar@gmail.com.
REFERENCES
- 1.Burns A. Observations of surgical anatomy: head and neck. Edinburgh, UK: Thomas Royce and Company; 1811. pp. 364–6. [Google Scholar]
- 2.King A. Case of chloroma. Mon J Med Sci 1853; 7: 97. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rappaport H. Atlas of tumor pathology. Sec. III, Fasicle 8, Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.
- 4.Wilson CS, Medeiros LJ. Extramedullary manifestations of myeloid neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 144: 219–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpo58ywibubesx [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guermazi A, Feger C, Rousselot P, Merad M, Benchaib N, Bourrier P, et al. Granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma): imaging findings in adults and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 319–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lengerke C, Wirths S, Kanz L. Unusual leukemia presentations. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5837–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fritz J, Vogel W, Bares R, Horger M. Radiologic spectrum of extramedullary relapse of myelogenous leukemia in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 209–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.06.1500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yilmaz AF, Saydam G, Sahin F, Baran Y. Granulocytic sarcoma: a systematic review. Am J Blood Res 2013; 3: 265–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Audouin J, Comperat E, Le Tourneau A, Camilleri-Broët S, Adida C, Molina T, et al. Myeloid sarcoma: clinical and morphologic criteria useful for diagnosis. Int J Surg Pathol 2003; 11: 271–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/106689690301100404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shinagare AB, Krajewski KM, Hornick JL, Zukotynski K, Kurra V, Jagannathan JP, et al. MRI for evaluation of myeloid sarcoma in adults: a single-institution 10-year experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 1193–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ooi GC, Chim CS, Khong PL, Au WY, Lie AK, Tsang KW, et al. Radiologic manifestations of granulocytic sarcoma in adult leukemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 1427–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bisschop MM, Révész T, Bierings M, van Weerden JF, van Wering ER, Hählen K, et al. Extramedullary infiltrates at diagnosis have no prognostic significance in children with acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 2001; 15: 46–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cheng CL, Li CC, Hou HA, Fang WQ, Chang CH, Lin CT, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukaemia with central nervous system involvement in adults. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1376-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kobayashi R, Tawa A, Hanada R, Horibe K, Tsuchida M, Tsukimoto I. Extramedullary infiltration at diagnosis and prognosis in children with acute myelogenous leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; 48: 393–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pomeranz SJ, Hawkins HH, Towbin R, Lisberg WN, Clark RA. Granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma): CT manifestations. Radiology 1985; 155: 167–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.155.1.3856292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ginsberg LE, Leeds NE. Neuroradiology of leukemia. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 525–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.165.3.7645463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Algharras AA, Mamourian A, Coyne T, Mohan S. Leukostasis in an adult with AML presenting as multiple high attenuation brain masses on CT. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 3020–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/6638.3893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vázquez E, Lucaya J, Castellote A. Neuroimaging in pediatric leukemia and lymphoma: differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2002; 22: 1411–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.226025029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parker K, Hardjasudarma M, Mcclellan RL, Fowler MR, Milner JW. MR features of an intracerebellar chloroma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 1592–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smidt MH, De bruin HG, van Veer MB, van den Bent MJ. Intracranial granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma) may mimic a subdural hematoma. J Neurol 2005; 252: 498–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0680-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mallory GM, Van Gompel JJ, Rabinstein AA, Fugate JE, Lanzino G. Wolf in sheep's clothing: acute chloroma disguised as a subdural hematoma. Neurocrit Care 2012; 16: 148–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9631-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freedy RM, Miller KD. Granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma): sphenoidal sinus and paraspinal involvement as evaluated by CT and MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12: 259–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Seok JH, Park J, Kim SK, Choi JE, Kim CC. Granulocytic sarcoma of the spine: MRI and clinical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 485–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.3086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anqi X, Siqing H, Zhenlin L, Chao Y. Sacral canal myeloid sarcoma as initial manifestation of granulocytic leukemia: MRI features and differential diagnosis (with a case report). Turk Neurosurg 2014; 24: 281–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.7125-12.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Noh BW, Park SW, Chun JE, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lim MK. Granulocytic sarcoma in the head and neck: CT and MR imaging findings. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 2: 66–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.3342/ceo.2009.2.2.66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zimmerman LE, Font RL. Ophthalmic manifestations of granulocytic sarcoma (myeloid sarcoma or chloroma). Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80: 975–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90326-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kovalski R, Hansen-Flaschen J, Lodato RF, Pietra GG. Localized leukemic pulmonary infiltrates. Diagnosis by bronchoscopy and resolution with therapy. Chest 1990; 97: 674–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.97.3.674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Prayongratana K, Kulpraneet M, Panichchob P, Tantisiriwat W. Acute monoblastic leukemia with t(10;11)(p12;q23) presenting with pulmonary involvement: a case report and literature review. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91: 559–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hermann G, Feldman F, Abdelwahab IF, Klein MJ. Skeletal manifestations of granulocytic sarcoma (chloroma). Skeletal Radiol 1991; 20: 509–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]