Abstract
Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated signaling are critical for host defense against pathogen invasion. However, excessive responses would cause harmful damages to the host. Here we show that deficiency of the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM32 increases poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced transcription of downstream genes such as type I interferons (IFNs) and proinflammatory cytokines in both primary mouse immune cells and in mice. Trim32-/- mice produced higher levels of serum inflammatory cytokines and were more sensitive to loss of body weight and inflammatory death upon Salmonella typhimurium infection. TRIM32 interacts with and mediates the degradation of TRIF, a critical adaptor protein for TLR3/4, in an E3 activity-independent manner. TRIM32-mediated as well as poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced degradation of TRIF is inhibited by deficiency of TAX1BP1, a receptor for selective autophagy. Furthermore, TRIM32 links TRIF and TAX1BP1 through distinct domains. These findings suggest that TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated immune responses by targeting TRIF to TAX1BP1-mediated selective autophagic degradation.
Author summary
TLR3/4-mediated signaling needs to be effectively terminated to avoid excessive immune responses and harmful damages to the host. In this study, we provide genetic evidence to show that the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses. Trim32-/- mice are more sensitive to the inflammatory death upon Salmonella typhimurium infection. We found that TRIM32-TAX1BP1-dependent selective autophagic degradation of the adaptor protein TRIF effectively turned off TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses. Our findings reveal a novel mechanism for terminating innate immune and inflammatory responses mediated by TLR3/4.
Introduction
The innate immune system is the first line of host defense against pathogen invasion. After detection of structurally conserved components of the invading pathogens by so-called pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), the host cells initiate a series of signaling cascades which ultimately induce the transcription of downstream antiviral genes, such as type I interferons (IFNs) and inflammatory cytokines, to induce innate immune and inflammatory responses as well as facilitate adaptive immunity [1,2,3,4]. However, excessive immune and inflammatory responses cause tissue damages and serious diseases such as septic shock [5].
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are evolutionarily conserved PRRs that play critical roles in host defense against various pathogens. TLRs contain an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and a conserved cytoplasmic toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain. Upon ligand stimulation, the TIR domains of TLRs mediate their homo- or hetero-dimerization [6], and act as platforms to recruit downstream TIR domain-containing adaptor proteins and other signaling molecules, leading to the activation of transcription factors such as IRF3 and NF-κB. These transcription factors collaborate to induce the transcription of a series of downstream antiviral genes [7]. Most TLRs except TLR3 and TLR4 signal through the TIR-containing adaptor MyD88. TLR3, which recognizes viral dsRNA and plays important roles in innate antiviral responses, signals through the TIR-containing adaptor TRIF but not MyD88 [8]. TLR4, which recognizes LPS of bacteria and is essential for innate and inflammatory responses to infected bacteria, signals through MyD88 to activate NF-κB and TRIF to activate NF-κB and IRF3 [9]. Double knockout of TRIF and MyD88 results in completely abolishment of LPS-induced activation of NF-κB, whereas TRIF-deficiency results in abolishment of LPS-induced activation of IRF3 [9].
Protein degradation is one of the main strategies which have been employed by host cells to inactivate proteins in biological processes. Autophagy is an essential homeostatic process by which damaged organelles, protein aggregates, and invading cytoplasmic microbes are sequestered in double-membraned autophagosomes and delivered to the lysosome for degradation [10]. There are growing evidences that autophagy can be highly selective [11]. Selective autophagy depends on the cargo receptors, including p62, TAX1BP1, NDP52 and so on, which are able to bind to special cargoes and dock onto the forming phagophores [11]. Certain selective autophagy receptors have been reported to be involved in regulation of immune responses. For examples, the cytosolic DNA viral sensor cGAS and intracellular Salmonella typhimurium can be degraded via p62- and TAX1BP1-dependent selective autophagy respectively [12,13]. Whether selective autophagy is involved in the regulation of other immune processes are unknown.
The tripartite motif-containing proteins (TRIMs) of E3 ubiquitin ligase families have been demonstrated to play critical regulatory roles in regulation of immune responses [14,15]. TRIM32 has been reported to mediate K63-linked polyubiquitination of MITA/STING and regulates innate immune responses to RNA and DNA viruses in human cell lines [7]. In this study, we generated TRIM32-deficient cells and Trim32 knockout mice, and found that TRIM32 negatively regulated TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses. Biochemical and cellular analysis revealed that TRIM32 mediated selective autophagic degradation of TRIF through TAX1BP1. Our findings suggest that TRIM32-TAX1BP1-dependent selective autophagic degradation of TRIF is an important negative regulatory mechanism of TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses.
Results
TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated signaling in primary mouse cells
Previously, it has been demonstrated that TRIM32 mediates K63-linked polyubiquitination of MITA/STING and regulates virus-triggered induction of downstream antiviral genes in human cell lines [7]. To investigate the functions of TRIM32, we utilized TRIM32 gene knockout mice (S1A & S1B Fig). We found that TRIM32-deficiency had no marked effects on the mRNA levels of downstream antiviral genes Ifnb1 and Isg56 as well as inflammatory cytokine genes Tnfa and Il6 induced by Sendi virus (SeV) or herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and dendritic cells (BMDCs) (S1C Fig), suggesting that TRIM32 does not regulate virus-triggered signaling in primary mouse cells. However, we found that TRIM32-deficiency potentiated poly(I:C) (a synthetic dsRNA ligand for TLR3)- and LPS (a ligand for TLR4)- but not PGN (a ligand for TLR2)- or R848 (a ligand for TLR7)-induced transcription of downstream genes Ifnb1, Isg56, Tnfa and Il6 in BMDMs, BMDCs and mouse lung fibroblasts (MLFs) (Fig 1A). Consistently, poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced phosphorylation of IRF3 and IκBα (hallmarks for IRF3 and NF-κB activation respectively) was dramatically increased in Trim32-/- MLFs in comparison to their wild-type counterparts (Fig 1B). LPS has been reported to induce both MyD88- and TRIF-dependent signaling, which usually results in serious harmful inflammation in vivo. Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA), a derivate of LPS, mainly induces TRIF- but not MyD88-dependent signaling, leading to some protective immune responses in vivo instead [16,17,18]. Interestingly, TRIM32-deficiency also increased MPLA-induced transcriptions of these genes in BMDMs (Fig 1C). These results suggest that TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4- but not TLR2/7-mediated signaling in primary mouse cells. Consistently, overexpression of TRIM32 markedly inhibited poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced activation of the IFN-β promoter, ISRE and NF-κB in human HEK293-TLR3 and HEK293-TLR4 cells respectively in reporter assays (Fig 1D). In similar experiments, TRIM32 did not inhibit IFNγ-induced activation of the IRF1 promoter (Fig 1E).
TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses in vivo
To investigate the role of TRIM32 in TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses in vivo, age- and sex-matched Trim32+/+ and Trim32−/− mice were intraperitoneally injected with poly(I:C) plus D-galactosamine or LPS. D-galactosamine is an agent usually used to enlarge inflammatory damage of liver, since poly(I:C) alone is insufficient to cause inflammatory death of mice. As shown in Fig 2A, poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced production of IFN-β, TNFα, and IL-6 was significantly increased in the sera of Trim32−/− compared to Trim32+/+ mice. Consistently, more serious inflammation was observed in the lungs of Trim32−/− mice injected with poly(I:C) plus D-galactosamine or LPS (Fig 2B). Trim32−/− mice showed an early death onset and a significantly higher percentage of lethality within 40 hours in comparison with their wild-type counterparts after injection of poly(I:C) plus D-galactosamine (Fig 2C) or LPS (Fig 2D). It has been reported that poly(I:C) and LPS are able to induce TRIF-dependent cell death which might contribute to poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced death of mice [19,20]. Therefore, we also explored whether TRIM32 is involved in TLR3/4-mediated and TRIF-dependent cell necrosis. The results showed that TRIM32-deficiency had no marked effects on poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced cell death in cell viability assays (S2 Fig). We have also explored the role of TRIM32 in MPLA-induced TRIF-dependent protective immune response in mice. Unlike LPS, MPLA does not cause much inflammatory response, and MPLA alone is insufficient to cause inflammatory death of mice. Therefore, we used D-galactosamine to enlarge the inflammatory response induced by MPLA. Interestingly, though MPLA-induced increased transcriptions of type I IFNs and inflammatory genes in Trim32-/- cells (Fig 1C), MPLA plus D-galactosamine-induced serum inflammatory cytokine levels and inflammatory death were markedly decreased in Trim32-/- mice (Fig 2E & 2F), suggesting that TRIM32 plays an important role in MPLA-induced TRIF-dependent protective immune response in vivo.
We have also explored the role of TRIM32 in immune and inflammatory responses to Salmonella typhimurium infection. As shown in Fig 3A, Trim32-/- mice carried less Salmonella typhimurium in their livers and spleens compared with that of their wild-type littermates at 8 days post oral administration of Salmonella typhimurium, suggesting that Trim32-/- mice exhibited more efficient clearance of invaded Salmonella typhimurium than the wild-type mice. Consistently, a larger number of viable immune cells existed in the spleens of Trim32-/- mice (Fig 3B). Trim32-/- mice produced much higher levels of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IL-6 (Fig 3C) and showed much more serious inflammatory damage of their small intestinal villus (Fig 3D) after oral adiminstration of Salmonella typhimurium, which led to a higher sensitivity to Salmonella typhimurium-induced loss of body weight and inflammatory death of Trim32-/- mice (Fig 3E & 3F). These results suggest that TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses in vivo.
TRIM32 destablizes TRIF independent of its E3 ligase activity
We next investigated the molecular mechanisms of TRIM32 in the regulation of TLR3/4-mediated signaling. Reporter assays showed that TRIM32 inhibited TRIF-, but not TBK1- and IRF3-mediated activation of ISRE (Fig 4A). Furthermore, both overexpression and endogenous coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that TRIM32 interacted with TRIF (Fig 4B and 4C). In addition, we routinely found that TRIM32 dramatically destabilized TRIF but not TRAF3, TBK1 or IRF3 in our co-transfection experiments (Fig 4D). Endogenous experiments indicated that TRIM32-deficiency markedly attenuated poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF in MLFs (Fig 4E). These results suggest that TRIM32 mediates the down-regulation of TRIF, which is an adaptor protein specifically utilized by TLR3/4 but not other TLRs.
Since TRIM32 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase, we examined whether TRIM32 destabilizes TRIF via the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway. Unexpectedly, the E3 enzyme-inactive mutants of TRIM32, TRIM32(C40S) and TRIM32(ΔRING), destabilized TRIF as efficient as the wild-type TRIM32 (Fig 4F). Furthermore, TRIM32 failed to catalyze polyubiquitination of TRIF (Fig 4G). Consistently, reconstitution of either wild-type TRIM32 or TRIM32(ΔRING) in Trim32-/- cells could inhibit poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced transcription of Ifnb1, Tnfa and Il6 genes to similar levels (Fig 4H). These data suggest that TRIM32 mediates the down-regulation of TRIF independent of its E3 ligase activity.
TRIM32 mediates autophagic degradation of TRIF
Protein degradation is one of the main strategies involved in inactivating proteins in biological processes. Two major systems exist for protein degradation, including the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome pathways. We found that TRIM32-mediated degradation of TRIF could be inhibited by the lysosomal inhibitor NH4Cl and the autophagic inhibitor 3MA but not the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (Fig 5A), suggesting that TRIM32 probably mediates degradation of TRIF via an autophagic pathway. Confocal microscopy experiments showed that poly(I:C) stimulation caused aggregation of GFP-LC3 (a marker of autophagy) in HEK293-TLR3 cells (Fig 5B). Poly(I:C) stimulation also caused colocalization of TRIF with GFP-LC3 in HEK293-TLR3 cells (Fig 5C). To further confirm that autophagic degradation pathway is involved in TRIF degradation upon stimulation, we used MG132 and 3MA to pre-treat Trim32+/+ and Trim32-/- BMDMs for 2 hours before poly(I:C) stimulation. The results showed that 3MA pre-treatment had no marked effects on TRIF level in both un-stimulated Trim32+/+ and Trim32-/- cells, but attenuated poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF in Trim32+/+ but not Trim32-/- cells (Fig 5D). MG132 pre-treatment markedly increased TRIF level in un-stimulated cells and also attenuated poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF in both Trim32+/+ and Trim32-/- cells (Fig 5D). TRIF has been reported to be degraded by TRIM38 via the ubiquitin-proteasome dependent pathway, and TRIM38-deficiency increases TRIF level in un-stimulated cells and attenuates poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF [21]. Consistently, knockdown of TRIM38 increased TRIF level in un-stimulated Trim32-/- cells, and also attenuated poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF to a larger extent in these cells (Fig 5E). Taken together, these results suggest that TRIM32 is involved in the autophagic degradation of TRIF induced by poly(I:C) stimulation. Additional experiments showed that knockdown of LC3B, which is an important marker of autophagy and is required for fusion to the lysosomes, markedly inhibited TRIM32-mediated degradation of TRIF (Fig 5F), whereas overexpression of TRIM32 dramatically enhanced the interaction of TRIF with LC3B-II (Fig 5G), which is a basic membrane component of autophagesomes and derived from LC3B-I during autophagy [22]. In similar experiments, overexpression of TRIM32 did not cause the conversion of LC3B-I to LC3B-II (Fig 5H). Moreover, deficiency of ATG7, which is an essential E1 ligase for LC3B-II formation, inhibited poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced degradation of TRIF (Fig 5I). These results suggest that TRIM32 mediates degradation of TRIF through the autophagy-lysosome pathway. Consistently, pre-treatment of cells with balifomycin, an inhibitor for fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, markedly attenuated poly(I:C)-induced down-regulation of TRIF (Fig 5J). Endogenous TRIM32 constitutively associated with TRIF in un-stimulated cells, and their association slowly decreased following poly(I:C) stimulation (Fig 5J), suggesting that TRIM32 disassociates from TRIF-containing autophagosomes at the later stage of stimulation.
TRIF is degraded by TRIM32-TAX1BP1-mediated selective autophagy
The autophagic pathways can be distinguished as the canonical or the selective autophagic pathway. The selective autophagy receptors deliver cargoes to the autophagosomes for selective degradation [23]. It has been shown that ULK1/2, FIP200 and ATG13 are critical for initiation of the classical autophagic pathway [23]. We found that deficiency of ULK1/2, FIP200 or ATG13 had no marked effects on the degradation of TRIF induced by poly(I:C) or LPS treatment (Fig 6A–6C), suggesting that poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced degradation of TRIF is not via the canonical autophagic pathway. It has been shown that NDP52 serves as a selective receptor for TRIF and TRAF6 for their selective autophagic degradation [24]. However, in our experiments, we observed that NDP52 failed to interact with and promote degradation of TRIF (Fig 6D & 6E). In similar experiments, NDP52 promoted the degradation of TRAF6 (Fig 6D). Instead, we found that TRIF interacted with other selective receptors including TAX1BP1, OPTN and p62 (Fig 6E), but only overexpression of TAX1BP1, but not OPTN or p62 down-regulated the level of TRIF (Fig 6F). Consistently, knockdown of TAX1BP1 inhibited TRIM32-mediated degradation of TRIF (Fig 6G). In addition, knockdown of TAX1BP1 but not NDP52 attenuated poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF (Fig 6H). Furthermore, knockdown of TAX1BP1 markedly impaired endogenous association of TRIF with LC3 induced by poly(I:C) stimulation (Fig 6I). These results suggest that TAX1BP1 but not NDP52 mediates the selective autophagic degradation of TRIF. Consistent with the biochemical results, qPCR experiments showed that knockdown of TAX1BP1 potentiated poly(I:C)-induced transcription of Ifnb1, Cxcl10 and Il6 genes (Fig 6J).
To explore the mechanism of TRIM32- and TAX1BP1-mediated autophagic degradation of TRIF, we tested a straightforward hypothesis that TRIM32 acts as a bridge protein for TRIF-TAX1BP1 interaction. Confocal microscopy indicated that overexperssion of TRIM32 promoted colocolization of TRIF and TAX1BP1 in certain aggregates that were positive for the autophagosome marker GFP-LC3 (Fig 7A) or lysosome marker GFP-LAMP1 (Fig 7B). Endogenous coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that TRIM32-deficiency abolished poly(I:C)-induced association of TRIF with TAX1BP1 as well as attenuated poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF (Fig 7C). These results suggest that TRIM32 acts as a bridge protein for TRIF-TAX1BP1 interaction following poly(I:C) stimulation.
Domain mapping experiments indicated that the NHL (aa360-655) and BBOX (aa66-139) domains of TRIM32 are required for its interaction with TAX1BP1 and TRIF respectively (Fig 7D). Similar experiments indicated that TRIM32 interacted with the middle TIR domain (aa386-475) of TRIF (Fig 7E), whereas TAX1BP1 interacted most strongely with the C-terminal domain (aa476-732) of TRIF (Fig 7E). These results suggest that TRIM32 links TAX1BP1 and TRIF through distinct domains (Fig 7F).
Additionally, we have also explored whether TRIM32 and TAX1BP1 are recruited to lipid rafts of membrane where TLR3/4 recruits TRIF for signaling. Cellular fractionation experiments indicated that membrane-associated TRIF was increased at 0.5 hour after poly(I:C) treatment and then decreased at 1 hour probably because of the degradation of TRIF (S3 Fig). TRIM32 constitutively existed in both cytosol and membrane franction, and poly(I:C) treatment had no marked effects on its distribution. Interestingly, TAX1BP1 only existed in the cytosol either before or after poly(I:C) treatment. Furthermore, TRIF-deficiency had no marked effects on the subcellular location of TRIM32 and TAX1BP1 either before or after poly(I:C) treatment (S3 Fig). These results suggest that TAX1BP1 is not recruited to lipid rafts of membrane, and TRIM32-TAX1BP1-TRIF association occurs in the cytosol after TRIF is dis-associated from the TLR3/4 receptor complexes on the membrane.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the role of TRIM32 in TLR3/4-mediated signaling in mouse primary immune cells and in vivo by genetic and biochemical studies. TRIM32-deficiency potentiated poly(I:C)- and LPS- but not R848- or PGN-induced transcription of downstream genes Ifnb1, Isg56, Tnfa and Il6 in BMDMs, BMDCs and MLFs. TRIM32-deficiency also elevated the serum cytokine levels induced by poly(I:C) and LPS, and renders the mice more susceptible to death triggered by administration of poly(I:C) and LPS or Salmonella typhimurium infection. These findings suggest that TRIM32 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses.
It has been shown that TRIM32 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase which regulates both DNA- and RNA viruses-triggered induction of type I IFNs in several human cell lines [7]. The current study indicates that TRIM32 is not required for induction of downstream antiviral genes induced by both DNA and RNA viruses in primary mouse cells or in mice. It is possible that TRIM32 functions in different cellular processes between human and mouse cells. TRIM proteins belong to the largest E3 ubiquitin ligase family in mammals, and it has been previously shown that some TRIM family members have distinct functions between human and mouse [25]. In contrast with the observations that the E3 ligase activity of TRIM32 is required for its roles in virus-triggered signaling in human cell lines [7], several results from the current study suggest that the E3 ligase activity of murine TRIM32 is not required for its negative regulatory roles in TLR3/4-mediated signaling. Firstly, the E3 enzyme-inactive mutants of TRIM32 destabilized TRIF as efficiently as the wild-type protein. Second, reconstitution of both the wild-type and E3 enzyme-inactive TRIM32 into Trim32-/- cells inhibited the transcription of downstream genes induced by poly(I:C) and LPS. TRIF is a critical adaptor protein for TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses. Poly(I:C) or LPS stimulation causes a rapid and dramatic degradation of TRIF to avoid sustained activation of TRIF and expression of type I IFNs and inflammatory cytokines. Previous studies demonstrate that the E3 ubiquitin ligases WWP2 and TRIM38 target TRIF for degradation and inhibit TLR3/4-mediated innate immune responses [21,26]. Both WWP2 and TRIM38 catalyze K48-linked polyubiquitination of TRIF and promote TRIF degradation via the well-established ubiquitin-proteasome system. Instead, TRIM32 promotes TRIF degradation via the autophagic pathway, since the autophagy inhibitor 3MA and lysosome inhibitor NH4Cl but not the ubiquitin-proteasome inhibitor MG132 impaired TRIM32-mediated degradation of TRIF. In addition, TRIM32 promoted the interaction of TRIF with LC3B-II, which is the critical component for autophagosome formation. Interestingly, TRIM32 promotes TRIF degradation via the selective instead of the classical autophagic pathway, since deficiency of components of the selective but not classical autophagic pathway inhibited TRIM32-mediated, as well as poly(I:C)- and LPS-induced degradation of TRIF. Our results also indicated that TRIM38 but not TRIM32 down-regulated TRIF level in un-stimulated cells, whereas TRIM32 contributed to ligand-induced degradation of TRIF. Therefore, TRIM38 and TRIM32 regulate TRIF-mediated signaling through distinct mechanisms.
Several experiments suggest that the selective autophagic receptor TAX1BP1 but not NDP52 is involved in TRIM32-mediated autophagic degradation of TRIF. TAX1BP1 but not NDP52 interacted with TRIF. Overexpression of TAX1BP1 but not NDP52 promoted degradation of TRIF, whereas knockdown of TAX1BP1 but not NDP52 impaired TRIM32-mediated as well as poly(I:C)-induced degradation of TRIF. Furthermore, knockdown of TAX1BP1 markedly impaired poly(I:C)-induced endogenous association of TRIF with LC3.
Our experiments suggest that TRIM32 acts as a link for TRIF and TAX1BP1. Confocal microscopy showed that TRIM32 promoted colocalization of TRIF and TAX1BP1 in certain aggregates which are positive for the autophagosome marker GFP-LC3 or the lysosome marker GFP-LAMP1, while TRIM32-deficiency abolished endogenous association of TRIF with TAX1BP1 induced by poly(I:C). Domain mapping experiments indicated that the BBOX and NHL domains of TRIM32 were required for its interaction with the TIR domain of TRIF and TAX1BP1 respectively, whereas TAX1BP1 interacted with the C-terminal domain of TRIF. These results suggest that TRIM32 links TRIF to the TAX1BP1 autophagosomes through distinct domains.
Based on our data, we propose a working model on the regulatory role of TRIM32 in TLR3/4-mediated innate immune responses (Fig 7G). Ligand binding to TLR3/4 leads to the recruitment of the critical adaptor protein TRIF. TRIF in turn recruits downstream components, leading to activation of several transcription factors and ultimate induction of downstream innate immune and inflammatory genes. Upon activation, TRIF is recruited by TRIM32 to TAX1BP1-containing and LC3-associated autophagosomes for degradation, contributing to termination of TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses. Our findings suggest that selective autophagic degradation is an important regulatory mechanism for timely termination of innate immune and inflammatory responses mediated by TLR3/4.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Wuhan University animal care and use committee guidelines.
Reagents and antibodies
Mouse monoclonal antibodies against Flag (Sigma), HA (Origene), β-actin (Sigma), p-IκBα (CST), p-IRF3 (CST) and p-TBK1 (Abcam); poly(I:C) (Invivogen), LPS (Sigma), R848 (Invivogen), PGN (Invivogen), human IFN-γ (PeproTech), Bafilomycin (Sigma), Monophosphoryl lipid A (Sigma), Z-KAD-FMK (MCE) were purchased from the indicated companies. Luminescent cell viability assay kit (G7570) was purchased from Promega. Mouse antisera to TRIM32 and TRIF were raised against recombinant human TRIM32 and murine TRIF(1–475) respectively. Rabbit antisera to TAX1BP1 and NDP52 were raised against recombinant murine TAX1BP1 and NDP52(1–160) respectively.
Constructs
Mammalian expression plasmids for Flag- or HA-tagged murine TRIM32 and its mutants, TRIF and its mutants, TRAF6, TRAF3, TBK1, IRF3, TAX1BP1 and NDP52 were constructed by standard molecular biology techniques.
Mice and genotyping
Trim32 gene knockout mice with a CL7/B6 background were provided by Dr. Hong-Liang Li [27]. Genotyping by PCR was performed using the following two pairs of primers: WT-1: GGAGAGACACTATTTCCTAAGTCA;WT-2: GTTCAGGTGAGAAGCTGCTGCA; MT: GGGACAGGATAAGTATGACATCA.
Amplification of the wild-type allele with primers WT-1 and WT-2 results in a 250-bp fragment, whereas amplification of the disrupted allele with primers WT-1 and MT results in a 300-bp fragment.
Generation of BMDMs and BMDCs
BMDMs and BMDCs were generated as described [28]. The bone marrow cells (1×107) were cultured in RPMI medium 1640 containing 10% FBS and 10 ng/mL recombinant murine M-CSF (Peprotech) or GM-CSF-containing conditional medium in a 100-mm dish for 5 or 9 days for generation of BMDMs or BMDCs respectively.
Isolation of MLFs
Primary lung fibroblasts were generated as described [29]. Primary lung fibroblasts were isolated from approximately 4- to 6-week-old mice. Lungs were minced and digested in calcium and magnesium free HBSS containing 10 μg/ml type II collagenase (Worthington) and 20 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 hours at 37°C with shaking. Cell suspensions were filtered through progressively smaller cell strainers (100 and 40 μm) and then centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 4 min. The cells were then plated in culture medium (1:1 [v/v] DMEM/Ham’s F-12 containing 10% FBS, 15 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin). After 1 hour, adherent fibroblasts were rinsed with HBSS and cultured in media.
Mouse poly(I:C) and LPS injection
Age- and sex-matched Trim32+/+ and Trim32-/- mice were injected intraperitoneally with poly(I:C) (5 μg/g body weight) plus D-galactosamine (1 mg/g body weight) or with LPS (10 μg/g body weight). The survival of the injected mice was monitored every 2 hours.
Mouse infection with Salmonella typhimurium
Age- and sex-matched Trim32+/+ and Trim32-/- mice were orally administrated with Salmonella typhimurium (1×107 pfu per mouse). The body weight and survival of the infected mice were monitored every day.
Measurement of cytokines
Blood from mice injected with poly(I:C) plus D-galactosamine or LPS was collected at the indicated times and the serum concentration of TNFα (Biolegend), IL-6 (Biolegend), and IFN-β (PBL) were measured by ELISA kits from the indicated manufactures.
Transfection and reporter assays
Transfection and reporter assays were performed as previous described [30,31,32,33]. HEK293 cells were seeded on 24-well plates and transfected on the following day by standard calcium phosphate precipitation. Where necessary, empty control plasmid was added to ensure that each transfection receives the same amount of total DNA. To normalize for transfection efficiency, pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase) reporter plasmid (0.01 μg) was added to each transfection. Luciferase assays were performed using a dual-specific luciferase assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Firefly luciferase activities were normalized based on Renilla luciferase activities.
Coimmunoprecipitation, immunoblotting and ubiquitination assays
Coimmunoprecipitation, immunoblotting and ubiquitination assays were performed as previous described [34,35,36]. For ubiquitination assays, the immunoprecipitates were re-extracted in lysis buffer containing 1% SDS and denatured by heating for 5 min. The supernatants were diluted with regular lysis buffer until the concentration of SDS was decreased to 0.1%, followed by re-immunoprecipitation with the indicated antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting with the ubiquitin antibody.
qPCR
qPCR assays were performed as previously describe [37,38,39,40]. Total RNA from mouse or human cells was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). After reverse-transcription with oligo(dT) primer using a RevertAidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas), aliquots of products were subjected to qPCR analysis to measure mRNA levels of the tested genes. Gapdh was used as a reference gene. Gene-specific primer sequences were previously described [33,41].
Immunohistochemistry analysis
Lungs or intestines from mice were fixed in formalin and embedded into paraffin blocks. The paraffin blocks were sectioned (5 μm) for H&E staining. The immunohistochemistry analysis was performed on the 5-μm sections. The sections were placed on polylysinecoated slides, deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through graded ethanol, quenched for endogenous peroxidase activity in 3% hydrogen peroxide, and processed for antigen retrieval by microwave heating for 7 min in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (Zymed Laboratories) for 5 min and coverslipped. Pictures were acquired using a HistoFAXS system.
Subcellular fractionation
TRIF+/+ and TRIF-/- HEK293-TLR3 cells (5×107) were treated with poly(I:C) for the indicated times, and then cells were harvested and lysed by douncing for 20 times in 2 ml homogenization buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, and 250 mM sucrose). The homogenate was centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min for removal of the crude nuclei. The supernatant (S5) was centrifuged at 100, 000 g for 2 hours for cytosol (S100K) and membrane (P100K) generation.
Statistical analysis
Differences between averages were analyzed by Student’s t-test. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Hong-Liang Li for providing Trim32 gene knockout mice, Dr. Lin Guo for providing Salmonella typhimurium.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFA0502100, 2014CB910103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31630045, 31521091, and 91429304), and the National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX201600116). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O (2006) Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124: 783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carpenter S, Ricci EP, Mercier BC, Moore MJ, Fitzgerald KA (2014) Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 361–376. doi: 10.1038/nri3682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hiscott J (2007) Convergence of the NF-kappaB and IRF pathways in the regulation of the innate antiviral response. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 18: 483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gurtler C, Bowie AG (2013) Innate immune detection of microbial nucleic acids. Trends Microbiol 21: 413–420. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Negishi H, Yanai H, Nakajima A, Koshiba R, Atarashi K, et al. (2012) Cross-interference of RLR and TLR signaling pathways modulates antibacterial T cell responses. Nat Immunol 13: 659–666. doi: 10.1038/ni.2307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jin MS, Lee JO (2008) Structures of the toll-like receptor family and its ligand complexes. Immunity 29: 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang J, Hu MM, Wang YY, Shu HB (2012) TRIM32 protein modulates type I interferon induction and cellular antiviral response by targeting MITA/STING protein for K63-linked ubiquitination. J Biol Chem 287: 28646–28655. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.362608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA (2001) Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413: 732–738. doi: 10.1038/35099560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, et al. (2003) Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science 301: 640–643. doi: 10.1126/science.1087262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ma Y, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G (2013) Autophagy and cellular immune responses. Immunity 39: 211–227. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mijaljica D, Nazarko TY, Brumell JH, Huang WP, Komatsu M, et al. (2012) Receptor protein complexes are in control of autophagy. Autophagy 8: 1701–1705. doi: 10.4161/auto.21332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen M, Meng Q, Qin Y, Liang P, Tan P, et al. (2016) TRIM14 Inhibits cGAS Degradation Mediated by Selective Autophagy Receptor p62 to Promote Innate Immune Responses. Mol Cell 64: 105–119. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tumbarello DA, Manna PT, Allen M, Bycroft M, Arden SD, et al. (2015) The Autophagy Receptor TAX1BP1 and the Molecular Motor Myosin VI Are Required for Clearance of Salmonella Typhimurium by Autophagy. PLoS Pathog 11: e1005174 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ozato K, Shin DM, Chang TH, Morse HC, 3rd (2008) TRIM family proteins and their emerging roles in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 849–860. doi: 10.1038/nri2413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nisole S, Stoye JP, Saib A (2005) TRIM family proteins: retroviral restriction and antiviral defence. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 799–808. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mata-Haro V, Cekic C, Martin M, Chilton PM, Casella CR, et al. (2007) The vaccine adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A as a TRIF-biased agonist of TLR4. Science 316: 1628–1632. doi: 10.1126/science.1138963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Embry CA, Franchi L, Nunez G, Mitchell TC Mechanism of impaired NLRP3 inflammasome priming by monophosphoryl lipid A. Sci Signal 4: ra28 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schulke S, Flaczyk A, Vogel L, Gaudenzio N, Angers I, et al. MPLA shows attenuated pro-inflammatory properties and diminished capacity to activate mast cells in comparison with LPS. Allergy 70: 1259–1268. doi: 10.1111/all.12675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.He S, Liang Y, Shao F, Wang X Toll-like receptors activate programmed necrosis in macrophages through a receptor-interacting kinase-3-mediated pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 20054–20059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116302108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kaiser WJ, Sridharan H, Huang C, Mandal P, Upton JW, et al. Toll-like receptor 3-mediated necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J Biol Chem 288: 31268–31279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.462341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hu MM, Xie XQ, Yang Q, Liao CY, Ye W, et al. (2015) TRIM38 Negatively Regulates TLR3/4-Mediated Innate Immune and Inflammatory Responses by Two Sequential and Distinct Mechanisms. J Immunol 195: 4415–4425. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuma A, Matsui M, Mizushima N (2007) LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization. Autophagy 3: 323–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boyle KB, Randow F (2013) The role of 'eat-me' signals and autophagy cargo receptors in innate immunity. Curr Opin Microbiol 16: 339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Inomata M, Niida S, Shibata K, Into T (2012) Regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling by NDP52-mediated selective autophagy is normally inactivated by A20. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 963–979. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0819-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shi M, Deng W, Bi E, Mao K, Ji Y, et al. (2008) TRIM30 alpha negatively regulates TLR-mediated NF-kappa B activation by targeting TAB2 and TAB3 for degradation. Nat Immunol 9: 369–377. doi: 10.1038/ni1577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang Y, Liao B, Wang S, Yan B, Jin Y, et al. (2013) E3 ligase WWP2 negatively regulates TLR3-mediated innate immune response by targeting TRIF for ubiquitination and degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 5115–5120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220271110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen L, Huang J, Ji Y, Zhang X, Wang P, et al. (2016) Tripartite motif 32 prevents pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Clin Sci (Lond) 130: 813–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun Q, Sun L, Liu HH, Chen X, Seth RB, et al. (2006) The specific and essential role of MAVS in antiviral innate immune responses. Immunity 24: 633–642. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hu MM, Yang Q, Xie XQ, Liao CY, Lin H, et al. (2016) Sumoylation Promotes the Stability of the DNA Sensor cGAS and the Adaptor STING to Regulate the Kinetics of Response to DNA Virus. Immunity 45: 555–569. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang J, Hu MM, Shu HB, Li S (2014) Death-associated protein kinase 1 is an IRF3/7-interacting protein that is involved in the cellular antiviral immune response. Cell Mol Immunol 11: 245–252. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2013.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lei CQ, Zhong B, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang S, et al. (2010) Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta regulates IRF3 transcription factor-mediated antiviral response via activation of the kinase TBK1. Immunity 33: 878–889. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu LG, Wang YY, Han KJ, Li LY, Zhai Z, et al. (2005) VISA is an adapter protein required for virus-triggered IFN-beta signaling. Mol Cell 19: 727–740. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hu MM, Yang Q, Zhang J, Liu SM, Zhang Y, et al. (2014) TRIM38 inhibits TNFalpha- and IL-1beta-triggered NF-kappaB activation by mediating lysosome-dependent degradation of TAB2/3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 1509–1514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318227111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhong B, Zhang L, Lei C, Li Y, Mao AP, et al. (2009) The ubiquitin ligase RNF5 regulates antiviral responses by mediating degradation of the adaptor protein MITA. Immunity 30: 397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhong B, Yang Y, Li S, Wang YY, Li Y, et al. (2008) The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. Immunity 29: 538–550. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhong B, Zhang Y, Tan B, Liu TT, Wang YY, et al. (2010) The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF5 targets virus-induced signaling adaptor for ubiquitination and degradation. J Immunol 184: 6249–6255. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luo WW, Lian H, Zhong B, Shu HB, Li S (2014) Kruppel-like factor 4 negatively regulates cellular antiviral immune response. Cell Mol Immunol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ran Y, Liu TT, Zhou Q, Li S, Mao AP, et al. (2011) SENP2 negatively regulates cellular antiviral response by deSUMOylating IRF3 and conditioning it for ubiquitination and degradation. J Mol Cell Biol 3: 283–292. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjr020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.He X, Li Y, Li C, Liu LJ, Zhang XD, et al. (2013) USP2a negatively regulates IL-1beta- and virus-induced NF-kappaB activation by deubiquitinating TRAF6. J Mol Cell Biol 5: 39–47. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjs024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yan J, Li Q, Mao AP, Hu MM, Shu HB (2014) TRIM4 modulates type I interferon induction and cellular antiviral response by targeting RIG-I for K63-linked ubiquitination. J Mol Cell Biol 6: 154–163. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mju005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou Q, Lin H, Wang S, Wang S, Ran Y, et al. (2014) The ER-associated protein ZDHHC1 is a positive regulator of DNA virus-triggered, MITA/STING-dependent innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe 16: 450–461. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.