Abstract
The occurrence of upper-extremity arterial disease is less common than that of the lower extremities. Nevertheless, exercise-induced symptoms, when present, can significantly affect functional capacity and limit quality of life. We report a case of exertional right upper-extremity pain and severe right axillary artery disease that was revascularized using an off-label drug-coated balloon technology with resolution of symptoms.
Clinical manifestations of upper-extremity arterial disease tend to be distinct from those of lower-extremity disease, given the abundance of collateral circulation (1, 2). The main focus in managing upper-extremity arterial disease is treatment of preexisting cardiovascular risk factors with aggressive medical therapy and lifestyle modification. When refractory symptoms ensue, surgical or percutaneous revascularization should be considered. Surgery with bypass grafts has been associated with improved patency compared to endovascular therapy, but with comparable complication rates (3). When endovascular therapy is considered, the preferred method remains controversial (4, 5). We present a patient with symptoms of right upper-extremity claudication and likely obstructive atherosclerotic disease of the axillary artery who underwent successful revascularization using drug-coated balloon angioplasty with subsequent resolution of symptoms.
CASE REPORT
A 66-year-old woman presented with right arm claudication. She had a prior history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pulmonary sarcoidosis, rheumatic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and a permanent pacemaker for tachy-brady syndrome. She had extensive atherosclerotic disease with known nonobstructive coronary and carotid artery disease and previous percutaneous revascularization for peripheral arterial disease. The patient had been maintained on aspirin and clopidogrel.
She presented with progressive symptoms of right arm discomfort, aggravated by exercise and heavy-object lifting. Examination disclosed a 40 mm Hg systolic blood pressure differential between the upper extremities and a diminished right radial pulse. Ultrasound of the upper extremities demonstrated severe right and moderate left axillary artery disease. Computed tomographic (CT) angiography confirmed the ultrasound findings and showed multifocal obstructive atherosclerotic lesions of the axillary arteries bilaterally. Serologic studies had been negative for an underlying inflammatory and/or autoimmune process with the exception of a mildly elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The patient underwent upper-extremity angiography, confirming the sonographic and CT angiography findings (Figure 1a). Given optimal medical therapy and refractory right arm claudication, the patient opted for endovascular therapy.
Figure 1.

Digital subtraction angiography images (a) before intervention, showing diffuse, obstructive atherosclerotic disease in the right axillary artery, and (b) after treatment with drug-coated balloon angioplasty.
A 6Fr 90 cm Cook sheath was advanced via the left common femoral artery into the right brachiocephalic trunk for endovascular intervention using standard sheath delivery techniques. Unfractionated heparin with a goal partial thromboplastin time of 250 to 300 seconds was given. The lesions in the axillary artery were crossed using a 0.018˝ gold-tip Glidewire (Terumo Medical Corp., Somerset, NJ). The 0.018˝ glidewire was exchanged for a supportive 0.035˝ SupraCore wire (Abbott, Chicago, IL). The right axillary artery lesions were subsequently predilated with a 4.0 mm × 40 mm Armada balloon (Abbott, Chicago, IL), followed by drug-coated balloon angioplasty with an IN.PACT Admiral 4.0 mm × 120 mm balloon (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). Postintervention angiography revealed excellent luminal expansion without evidence of flow-limiting dissections (Figure 1b). Postprocedurally, the patient reported resolution of her right upper-extremity symptoms, and the blood pressure differential had resolved. At 6- and 12-month follow-up, she remained asymptomatic, with 2+ right brachial, radial, and ulnar pulses.
DISCUSSION
Given the rarity of atherosclerotic axillary artery disease, most data on short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and/or stenting of focal upper-extremity atherosclerotic disease are extrapolated from subclavian artery revascularization (6) (Table 1). In a retrospective study evaluating outcomes in 274 patients treated with either a conservative (n = 165) or invasive (n = 109) approach for subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease with a median follow-up of 42 months, patients treated with PTA had a 60% risk reduction for the development of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (P < 0.01), defined as an upper-extremity blood pressure differential of ≥20 mm Hg compared with conservative treatment (7).
Table 1.
Summary of published data on patency rates of upper-extremity revascularization
| First author (Ref) | Year | Number of patients/narrowings | Follow-up in months | Narrowest artery | Revascularization | Patency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowman (11) | 1983 | 10/10 | 13 | Subclavian and innominate | PTA | 90% |
| Wilms (12) | 1987 | 22/23 | 25 | Subclavian | PTA | 82% |
| Burke (13) | 1987 | 27/30 | 36 | Subclavian, innominate, and vertebral | PTA | NA |
| Cook (14) | 1989 | 6/6 | 18 | Subclavian | PTA | 83% |
| Jaschke (15) | 1989 | 12/12 | 12 | Subclavian, innominate, and axillary | PTA | 91% |
| Qi (16) | 1991 | 125/125 | 46 | Subclavian and vertebral | PTA | 99% |
| Hebrang (17) | 1991 | 52/52 | 29 | Subclavian | PTA | 91% |
| Perrault (18) | 1993 | 11/11 | 38 | Subclavian | PTA | 100% |
| Millaire (19) | 1993 | 50/50 | 41 | Subclavian | PTA | 86% |
| Kumar (20) | 1995 | 27/31 | NA | Subclavian | Stent | NA |
| Motarjeme (21) | 1996 | 112/151 | 60 | Innominate, subclavian, carotid, and vertebral | PTA | 97% |
| Martinez (22) | 1997 | 17/17 | 19.4 | Subclavian | Stent | 81% |
| Rodriguez-Lopez (9) | 1999 | 69/70 | 13 | Subclavian | Stent | 73% |
| Körner (23) | 1999 | 37/43 | 15 | Subclavian and innominate | PTA | 72% |
| Schillinger (24) | 2001 | 115/115 | 44 | Subclavian | PTA ± stent | 59% |
| González (25) | 2002 | 9/9 | 37.4 | Subclavian | PTA | 89% |
| Angle (26) | 2003 | 21/21 | 27 | Subclavian | PTA ± stent | 79% |
| Modarai (3) | 2004 | 41/41 | 48 | Subclavian and innominate | PTA ± stent | 82% |
| Amor (27) | 2004 | 86/89 | 42 | Subclavian | Stent | 81% |
| De Vries (5) | 2005 | 110/110 | 34 | Subclavian | PTA ± stent | 88% |
| Filippo (28) | 2006 | 42/42 | 60 | Subclavian | Stent | 71% |
| Przewlocki (29) | 2006 | 75/76 | 24.4 | Subclavian and innominate | PTA ± stent | 77% |
| Sakai (30) | 2007 | 26/28 | 6 | Subclavian | Stent | 100% |
| Abu Rahma (31) | 2007 | 121/121 | 41 | Subclavian | PTA ± stent | 70% |
| Van Noord (32) | 2007 | 43/43 | 12 | Subclavian and brachiocephalic | PTA ± stent | 76% |
| Linni (33) | 2008 | 40/40 | 50.1 | Subclavian | Stent | 95% |
| Sixt (4) | 2009 | 107/108 | 12 | Subclavian and brachiocephalic | PTA ± stent | 88% |
| Yu (34) | 2010 | 14/14 | 12 | Subclavian | Stent | 93% |
| Wang (35) | 2010 | 59/61 | 40.7 | Subclavian | Stent | 85% |
| Song (36) | 2012 | 148/148 | 67 | Subclavian | Stent | 49% |
| Babic (37) | 2012 | 56/56 | 40 | Subclavian | Stent | 83% |
| Li (38) | 2013 | 71/71 | 27 | Subclavian | Stent | 85% |
| Higashimori (39) | 2013 | 59/60 | 49 | Subclavian | Stent | 86% |
| Almeida (40) | 2014 | 16/16 | 12 | Subclavian | Stent | 100% |
| Che (41) | 2016 | 167/167 | 60.6 | Subclavian | Stent | 87% |
NA indicates not available; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
Improvements in stent technology, coupled with widespread use, paved the way for studies evaluating the efficacy of stenting in upper-extremity vessels. An initial study by Sueoka et al (8) evaluated the efficacy of balloon-expandable stents in treating proximal subclavian artery stenosis causing subclavian steal syndrome after failure of an initial approach with PTA, with a procedural success rate of 100%. Subsequent studies by Rodriguez-Lopez et al (9) and Henry et al (10) demonstrated good short- and mid-term patency rates, with similar long-term patency rates compared with PTA. A recently published meta-analysis of 35 noncomparative studies with 1726 patients examining PTA and stenting in subclavian arterial occlusive disease found that technical success rates were higher in stented patients, without a statistical difference in rates of symptom resolution and long-term primary patency rates (6). We report the first case of symptomatic axillary artery disease successfully treated with off-label drug-coated balloon angioplasty and resolution of symptoms postprocedurally.
References
- 1.Capers Q, 4th, Phillips J. Advances in percutaneous therapy for upper extremity arterial disease. Cardiol Clin. 2011;29(3):351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shanmugasundaram M, Ram VK, Luft UC, Szerlip M, Alpert JS. Peripheral arterial disease—what do we need to know? Clin Cardiol. 2011;34(8):478–482. doi: 10.1002/clc.20925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Modarai B, Ali T, Dourado R, Reidy JF, Taylor PR, Burnand KG. Comparison of extra-anatomic bypass grafting with angioplasty for atherosclerotic disease of the supra-aortic trunks. Br J Surg. 2004;91(11):1453–1457. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sixt S, Rastan A, Schwarzwälder U, Bürgelin K, Noory E, Schwarz T, Beschorner U, Frank U, Müller C, Hauk M, Leppanen O, Hauswald K, Brantner R, Nazary T, Neumann FJ, Zeller T. Results after balloon angioplasty or stenting of atherosclerotic subclavian artery obstruction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(3):395–403. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Vries JP, Jager LC, Van den Berg JC, Overtoom TT, Ackerstaff RG, Van de Pavoordt ED, Moll FL. Durability of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for obstructive lesions of proximal subclavian artery: long-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(1):19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ahmed AT, Mohammed K, Chehab M, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Cloft H, Bjarnason H. Comparing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for treatment of subclavian arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(5):652–667. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schillinger M, Haumer M, Schillinger S, Mlekusch W, Ahmadi R, Minar E. Outcome of conservative versus interventional treatment of subclavian artery stenosis. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9(2):139–146. doi: 10.1177/152660280200900201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sueoka BL. Percutaneous transluminal stent placement to treat subclavian steal syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7(3):351–356. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)72865-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Werner A, Martinez R, Torruella LJ, Ray LI, Diethrich EB. Stenting for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the subclavian artery. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13(3):254–260. doi: 10.1007/s100169900254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Henry M, Amor M, Henry I, Ethevenot G, Tzvetanov K, Chati Z. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the subclavian arteries. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6(1):33–41. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0033:PTAOTS>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lowman BG, Queral LA, Holbrook WA, Estes JT, Bayly B, Dagher FJ. The correction of cerebrovascular insufficiency by transluminal dilatation: a preliminary report. Am Surg. 1983;49(11):621–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilms G, Baert A, Dewaele D, Vermylen J, Nevelsteen A, Suy R. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the subclavian artery: early and late results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1987;10(3):123–128. doi: 10.1007/BF02577985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burke DR, Gordon RL, Mishkin JD, McLean GK, Meranze SG. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of subclavian arteries. Radiology. 1987;164(3):699–704. doi: 10.1148/radiology.164.3.2956627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cook AM, Dyet JF. Six cases of subclavian stenosis treated by percutaneous angioplasty. Clin Radiol. 1989;40(4):352–354. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(89)80117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jaschke W, Menges HW, Ockert D, Huck K, Georgi M. PTA of the subclavian and innominate artery: short- and long-term results. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1989;32(1):29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qi JP, Zeitler E. Catheter dilatation of arterial stenoses of supra-aortic vessels and late results. Rofo. 1991;155(4):357–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hebrang A, Maskovic J, Tomac B. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the subclavian arteries: long-term results in 52 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(5):1091–1094. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.5.1826805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Perrault LP, Carrier M, Hudon G, Lemarbre L, Hébert Y, Pelletier LC. Transluminal angioplasty of the subclavian artery in patients with internal mammary grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(4):927–930. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90357-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Millaire A, Trinca M, Marache P, de Groote P, Jabinet JL, Ducloux G. Subclavian angioplasty: immediate and late results in 50 patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;29(1):8–17. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810290103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumar K, Dorros G, Bates MC, Palmer L, Mathiak L, Dufek C. Primary stent deployment in occlusive subclavian artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;34(4):281–285. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810340202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Motarjeme A. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of supra-aortic vessels. J Endovasc Surg. 1996;3(2):171–181. doi: 10.1177/152660289600300209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martinez R, Rodriguez-Lopez J, Torruella L, Ray L, Lopez-Galarza L, Diethrich EB. Stenting for occlusion of the subclavian arteries. Technical aspects and follow-up results. Tex Heart Inst J. 1997;24(1):23–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Körner M, Baumgartner I, Do DD, Mahler F, Schroth G. PTA of the subclavian and innominate arteries: long-term results. Vasa. 1999;28(2):117–122. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.28.2.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schillinger M, Haumer M, Schillinger S, Ahmadi R, Minar E. Risk stratification for subclavian artery angioplasty: is there an increased rate of restenosis after stent implantation? J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8(6):550–557. doi: 10.1177/152660280100800603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.González A, Gil-Peralta A, González-Marcos JR, Mayol A. Angioplasty and stenting for total symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusion of the subclavian or innominate arteries. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;13(2):107–113. doi: 10.1159/000047759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Angle JF, Matsumoto AH, McGraw JK, Spinosa DJ, Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Tribble CG. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of left subclavian artery stenosis in patients with left internal mammary-coronary bypass grafts: clinical experience and long-term follow-up. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003;37(2):89–97. doi: 10.1177/153857440303700202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amor M, Eid-Lidt G, Chati Z, Wilentz JR. Endovascular treatment of the subclavian artery: stent implantation with or without predilatation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63(3):364–370. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Filippo F, Francesco M, Francesco R, Corrado A, Chiara M, Valentina C, Giuseppina N, Salvatore N. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of left subclavian artery lesions for the treatment of patients with concomitant vertebral and coronary subclavian steal syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29(3):348–353. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-0265-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Przewlocki T, Kablak-Ziembicka A, Pieniazek P, Musialek P, Kadzielski A, Zalewski J, Kozanecki A, Tracz W. Determinants of immediate and long-term results of subclavian and innominate artery angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67(4):519–526. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sakai C, Sakai N, Kuroiwa T, Ishihara H, Adachi H, Morizane A, Yano T, Kajikawa R, Yamagami H, Kobayashi J, Kondo K, Kikuchi H. Stenting for chronic total occlusion of the proximal subclavian artery. Interv Neuroradiol. 2007;13(Suppl 1):135–140. doi: 10.1177/15910199070130S120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.AbuRahma AF, Bates MC, Stone PA, Dyer B, Armistead L, Scott Dean L, Scott Lavigne P. Angioplasty and stenting versus carotid-subclavian bypass for the treatment of isolated subclavian artery disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14(5):698–704. doi: 10.1177/152660280701400515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Van Noord BA, Lin AH, Cavendish JJ. Rates of symptom reoccurrence after endovascular therapy in subclavian artery stenosis and prevalence of subclavian artery stenosis prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(5):759–762. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Linni K, Ugurluoglu A, Mader N, Hitzl W, Magometschnigg H, Hölzenbein TJ. Endovascular management versus surgery for proximal subclavian artery lesions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008;22(6):769–775. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yu J, Korabathina R, Coppola J, Staniloae C. Transradial approach to subclavian artery stenting. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22(5):204–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang KQ, Wang ZG, Yang BZ, Yuan C, Zhang WD, Yuan B, Xing T, Song SH, Li T, Liao CJ, Zhang Y. Long-term results of endovascular therapy for proximal subclavian arterial obstructive lesions. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123(1):45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Song L, Zhang J, Li J, Gu Y, Yu H, Chen B, Guo L, Wang Z. Endovascular stenting vs. extrathoracic surgical bypass for symptomatic subclavian steal syndrome. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(1):44–51. doi: 10.1583/11-3692.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Babic S, Sagic D, Radak D, Antonic Z, Otasevic P, Kovacevic V, Tanaskovic S, Ruzicic D, Aleksic N, Vucurevic G. Initial and long-term results of endovascular therapy for chronic total occlusion of the subclavian artery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35(2):255–262. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0144-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li Y, Yin Q, Zhu W, Wang Y, Fan X, Liu D, Chen M, Wang Q, Xu G, Yan B, Liu X. Endovascular stenting for atherosclerotic subclavian artery stenosis in patients with other craniocervical artery stenosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013;35(1):107–114. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0789-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Higashimori A, Morioka N, Shiotani S, Fujihara M, Fukuda K, Yokoi Y. Long-term results of primary stenting for subclavian artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(5):696–700. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Almeida BL, Kambara AM, Rossi FH, Moreira SM, Oliveira ES, Linhares Filho FA, Metzger PB, Passalacqua AZ. Left subclavian artery stenting: an option for the treatment of the coronary-subclavian steal syndrome. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014;29(2):236–240. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Che WQ, Dong H, Jiang XJ, Peng M, Zou YB, Qian HY, Zhang HM, Wu HY, Yang YJ, Gao RL. Stenting for left subclavian artery stenosis in patients scheduled for left internal mammary artery-coronary artery bypass grafting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(Suppl 1):579–588. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
