Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2017 May 4;19(10):2552–2555. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00851

P-Stereogenic Bicyclo[4.3.1]Phosphite Boranes: Synthesis and Utility of Tunable P-Tether Systems for the Desymmetrization of C2-Symmetric 1,3-Anti-Diols

Jana L Markley 1, Paul R Hanson 1,*
PMCID: PMC5595702  NIHMSID: NIHMS877366  PMID: 28471175

Abstract

The development of P-stereogenicbicyclo[4.3.1]phosphite borane tether systems for the desymmetrization of C2-symmetric dienediols is reported. This report highlights preliminary studies including tether installation and removal, as well as chemoselective functionalization of the exocyclic olefin via diimide reduction or cross metathesis. Most notably, a divergent oxidation strategy allows for the transformation of the bicyclic phosphite borane complexes to the corresponding phosphate or thiophosphate systems, highlighting the electronic attenuation of this P-tether system.


graphic file with name nihms877366u1.jpg


The development of modifiable methods that allow for the controlled, predictable, and facile functionalization of core structural motifs prevalent in a variety of biologically active natural products stands central to modern day organic synthesis and early stage drug discovery. In particular, strategies that employ tether-mediated processes, which improve substrate selectivity and reactivity through innate intramolecularity, are powerful approaches to generate advanced intermediates from simple and complex chemical fragments.1 While silicon-based tethers are the most widely used and studied systems,2their phosphorus counterparts have emerged as viable alternatives.3 In particular, we have been interested in the development of P-stereogenic, bicyclic phosphates as tripodal, temporary tether systems for the synthesis of polyketide natural products (Figure 1).3Despite the notable features of temporary phosphate-tether methods, current efforts in our group have aimed at exploring alternative tripodal tether systems in order to identify unique reactivity profiles that may be exploited in the synthesis of chemical scaffolds which would be difficult or laborious to access via previously reported methods. To this end, we herein report the development of P-stereogenic, bicyclic, P(III)-phosphiteborane systems as electronically tunable, temporary tether strategies for the desymmetrization of 1,3-anti-diol-containing dienes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bicyclic phosphite boranes, P(III)-mediated ring-closing metathesis, and P-tether-mediated desymmetrization of C2-symmetric dienediols.

The synthesis and characterization of caged, cyclic phosphite borane complexes has a rich history, dating back to the seminal work of Heitsch and Verkade in the 1960’s (Figure 1).4 Though a majority of these complexes are generated via phosphitylation of preformed polyols, several strategies involving the formation of P(III)-phosphorus-borane heterocycles via ring-closing metathesis olefination have been reported.5 In 2001, Van Boom and coworkers published the synthesis of mono- and bicyclic phosphinite borane systems using enyne RCM and tandem enyne RCM-olefin RCM, which proceeded in high yield.6

Building upon this work and the work of a handful of laboratories involving ring-closing metathesis (RCM) of olefin-containing P(III)-borane complexes,5 we first examined the use of phosphite borane triesters for the desymmetrization of 1,3-anti-dienediols through a diastereoselective ring-closing metathesis. Enantiomeric dienediols (R,R)- and (S,S)-17 were coupled with commercially available allyl tetraisopropylphosphorodiamidite, in the presence of 1H-tetrazole, to provide the intermediate phosphite, which was subsequently protected by the addition of excess BH3•THF to afford the phosphite-boranetrienes (R,R)-2 and (S,S)-3 in 73% and 72%, respectively (Scheme 1). It should be noted that these trienes were stable for storage under argon atmosphere at lower temperatures (<5 °C) for greater than 1 year; however, extended times for chromatographic separation resulted in partial triene decomposition, even when eluent was doped with triethylamine (5–10%). Thus, purification of crude triene reaction mixture via filter column chromatography (silica, 15% EtOAc in hexanes) is required to separate triene from amine by-product that inhibits the following ring-closing metathesis reaction. RCM of trienes (S,S)-2 and (R,R)-3, in the presence of Grubbs second-generation catalyst [G-II, (ImesH2)(PCy3)(Cl)2Ru=CHPh],8 afforded bicyclo[4.3.1]phosphite boranes (SP,S,S)-4 and (RP,R,R)-5 as off-white solids.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of bicyclo[4.3.1]phosphite-borane via 7-membered ring-closing metathesis.

These bicyclic phosphite boranes were stable when stored at low temperature for extended periods of time (>2 years) and were also stable to chromatographic separation without observable decomposition. X-ray crystallographic analysis9 of (RP,R,R)-5 and (SP,S,S)-4 showed that each possess concave, caged structures similar to their phosphate counterparts, suggesting that the three-dimensional orientation of these substrates may allow for stereoselective additions to the internal olefin of the bicyclic phosphite borane systems (Scheme 2). In addition to column chromatography, the bicyclic phosphite borane (SP,S,S)-4 was found to be stable to acidic conditions common to a variety of work-up procedures.10 Reductive tether removal using Red-al provided the corresponding triol 6 in excellent yield, though bicyclic (SP,S,S)-4 was stable to a variety of other reductants/hydride sources (including LiBH4, NaBH4, and DIBAL-H). Chemoselective hydrogenation of the exocyclic olefin under diimide reaction conditions11 showed that, much like with the bicyclic phosphate, selective functionalization of the terminal, exocyclic olefin in the presence of the internal olefin is achievable (7).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reactivity profile of the bicyclo[4.3.1]phosphite borane tether systems.

In addition to chemoselective hydrogenation, the exocyclic olefin of the bicyclic phosphiteborane (in this case, (RP,R,R)-5) can be further functionalized via a selective cross-metathesis reaction, as shown in Table 1. We hypothesized that the exocyclic olefin of the bicyclic phosphite-borane systems would behave as a Type II/Type III12 olefin cross-partner in Ru-catalyzed cross metathesis reactions—in a manner similar to the behavior of the corresponding bicyclic phosphate.13 Indeed, this hypothesis was consistent with experimental observation, as cross metathesis of 5 was successful with a variety of Type I and Type II olefin cross partners and attempted cross-metathesis with Type III olefin cross partners (acrylonitrile and protected secondary alcohols) were low-yielding and/or unsuccessful. Exposure of 5 to Type I or Type II olefin cross partners, in the presence of catalytic Hoveyda-Grubbs second generation catalyst,14 provided the corresponding CM products in moderate to excellent yield for the substrates screened. It should be noted that the cis-homodimers of Type I olefins allowed for higher conversions and yields than the mono-counterparts (examples 8,9, 10), and lower yields were often the result of lower conversion, as evident by improved yields based on recovered starting material—which could be re-isolated and re-used in other reactions (examples 9 and 11).

Table 1.

Chemoselective cross metathesis studies for terminal olefin functionalization.

graphic file with name nihms877366f5.jpg

Finally, in addition to olefin functionalization, we were interested in the controlled transformation of P(III) to P(V) of our bicyclic phosphiteborane systems via deprotection oxidation strategies similar to those reported for other P(III)-borane complexes.15In this regard, a divergent oxidation strategy involving deprotection of the bicyclic phosphite borane with DABCO, followed by oxidation with either tert-butyl hydrogen peroxide or elemental sulfur (S8), successfully generated both the bicyclic phosphate (P=O, 14) and thiophosphate (P=S, 15) from the phosphiteborane precursor (4, Scheme 3). Though predictable, this result was exciting as it implied that the inherent reactivity profiles of both the bicyclic phosphite borane and bicyclic phosphate tether systems could be exploited separately or in tandem in a single synthetic strategy to rapidly build molecular complexity en route to the synthesis of natural products and, thus, increase the synthetic utility of the P-tether system overall.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Divergent oxidation strategies to bicyclic phosphates and thiophosphates.

In conclusion, the development of P-stereogenic, bicyclic phosphite borane tether systems for the desymmetrization of C2-symmetric, 1,3-anti-diol-containing dienes is reported. These systems are air and acid stable and storable at low temperatures for extended periods (>2 years). These systems can be selectively functionalized—through chemoselective hydrogenation or cross-metathesis of the exocyclic olefin, to provide elaborated structures without disrupting the integrity of the P–B bond. Finally, divergent oxidation strategies to generate the corresponding bicyclic phosphate and thiophosphate from the bicyclic phosphite borane expand the potential utility of this phosphorus tether—as one synthetic strategy could include chemistries unique to both bicyclic phosphite borane and bicyclic phosphate tether systems used separately and in tandem to generate advanced intermediates en route to the total synthesis of natural products. The development of such strategies is currently ongoing in our laboratory and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

Supp Info

Acknowledgments

This investigation was financially supported by NIGMS (NIH R01GM077309). We thank the University of Kansas and the State of Kansas for support of our program. In addition, we thank Justin Douglas and Sarah Neuenswander at the University of Kansas NMR Laboratory, Todd Williams and Lawrence Seib at KU for HRMS analysis, and Victor Day of the Molecular Structure Group (MSG) at the University of Kansas for X-ray analysis (NSF-MRI grant CHE-0923449). We also thank Materia, Inc. for supplying metathesis catalysts.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Experimental details and spectroscopic data of new compounds (PDF) and X-ray crystallographic files of 4 and 5 (CIF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare the following competing financial interest: P.R.H. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Materia, Inc.

References

  • 1.For a review on reversible, covalent bonding and induced in-tramolecularity as it relates to catalysis, see: Tan KL. ACS Catal. 2011;1:877–886.For use of temporary ketal tethers in metathesis reactions see: Burke SD, Voight EA. Org. Lett. 2001;3:237–240. doi: 10.1021/ol006887l.Voight EA, Rein C, Burke SD. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:8489–8499. doi: 10.1021/jo0263014.Ghosh SK, Hsung RP, Wang J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:5505–5510.Ghosh SK, Ko C, Liu J, Wang J, Hsung RP. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:10485–10496.For use of temporary carboxylate tethers in metathesis reactions see: Schmidt B, Kunz O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012;2012:1008–1018.
  • 2.a Evans PA. In: Metathesis in Natural Product Synthesis. Cossy J, Areniyadis S, Meyer C, editors. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2010. pp. 225–259. [Google Scholar]; b Cusak A. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:5800–5824. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Evans PA, Cui J, Buffone GP. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003;42:1734–1737. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Matsui R, Seto K, Fujita K, Suzuki T, Nakazaki A, Kobayashi S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:10068–10073. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a Whitehead A, McReynolds MD, Moore JD, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2005;7:3375–3378. doi: 10.1021/ol0512886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hanson PR, Jayasinghe S, Maitra S, Markley JL. In: Phosphorus Chemistry II: Synthetic Methods. Montchamp J-L, editor. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg: 2015. pp. 253–271. Topics in Current Chemistry 361. [Google Scholar]; c Chegondi R, Hanson PR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;56:3330–3333. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.01.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Bodugam M, Javed S, Ganguly A, Torres J, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2016;18:516–519. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Maitra S, Bodugam M, Javed S, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2016;18:3094–3097. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Venukadasula PKM, Chegondi R, Suryn GM, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2012;14:2634–2637. doi: 10.1021/ol301007h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Hanson PR, Jayasinghe S, Maitra S, Ndi CN, Chegondi R. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014;10:2332–2337. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.10.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Javed S, Bodugam M, Torres J, Hanson PR. Chem. Eur. J. 2016;22:6755–6758. doi: 10.1002/chem.201601004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a Heitsche CW, Verkade JG. Inorg. Chem. 1962;2:392–398. [Google Scholar]; b Heitsche CW, King RW, Verkade JG. Inorg. Chem. 1964;3:884–889. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a Schuman M, Trevitt M, Redd A, Gouverneur V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39:2491–2493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Slinn CA, Redgrave AJ, Hind SL, Edlin C, Nolan S, Gouverneur V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003;1:3820–3825. doi: 10.1039/b306940k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wu X, O’Brien P, Ellwood S, Secci F, Kelly B. Org. Lett. 2013;15:192–195. doi: 10.1021/ol303253h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Timmer MSM, Ovaa H, Filippov DV, van der Marel GA, van Boom JH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:8231–8233. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rychnovsky SD, Griesgraber G, Powers JP. Org. Synth. 2000;77:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scholl M, Ding S, Lee CW, Grubbs RH. Org. Lett. 1999;1:953–956. doi: 10.1021/ol990909q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.All X-ray crystallographic data has been submitted to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, and the structures for this work were assigned the following deposition numbers: (RP,R,R)-5 [1484372] and (SP,S,S)-4 [1484373].
  • 10.4 was stable to 1 N HCl in MeOH, 1 M NaHSO4 (aq) in THF, vigorous stirring in EtOAc and saturated NH4Cl (aq) [1:1].
  • 11.Myers AG, Zheng B, Movassaghi M. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:7507. doi: 10.1021/jo9710137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chatterjee AK, Choi T-L, Sanders DP, Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:11360–11370. doi: 10.1021/ja0214882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Waetzig JD, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2006;8:1673–1676. doi: 10.1021/ol0602809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.a Kingsbury JS, Harrity JPA, Bonitatebus PJ, Jr, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:791–799. [Google Scholar]; b Garber SB, Kingsbury JS, Gray BL, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:8168–8179. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uziel J, Dracel C, Moulin D, Bauduin C, Juge S. Tetra-hedron: Asymmetry. 2001;12:1441–1449. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Info

RESOURCES