Abstract
Huntington’s disease develops when the polyglutamine (polyQ) repeat in the Huntingtin (Htt) protein is expanded to over 35 glutamines rendering it aggregation-prone. Here, using Htt exon-1 as a polyQ model protein in a genome-wide screen in yeast, we show that the normal and soluble Htt exon-1 is toxic in cells with defects in type-1 myosin-dependent endocytosis. The toxicity of Htt is linked to physical interactions with type-1 myosins, which occur via the Htt proline-rich region, leading to a reduction in actin patch polarization and clathrin-dependent endocytosis. An expansion of the polyQ stretch from 25 to 103 glutamines, which causes Htt aggregation, alleviated Htt toxicity in cells lacking Myo5 or other components involved in early endocytosis. The data suggest that the proline-rich stretch of Htt interacts with type-1 myosin/clathrin-dependent processes and demonstrate that a reduction in the activity of such processes may result in a positive selection for polyQ expansions.
Introduction
Huntington’s disease (HD) is one of several neurological diseases caused by polyQ expansions in specific proteins. In the case of HD, CAG trinucleotide repeats causing the polyQ expansion occurs in exon-1 in the Huntingtin (HTT) gene1. Expression of polyQ-extended exon-1 leads to the formation of intracellular aggregates/inclusion bodies (IBs) in mice and the animals develop symptoms with similar characteristics to those of patients with HD2, 3. Furthermore, IBs detected in brains of deceased HD patients contain fragments of Htt similar to exon-1. These fragments of Htt are generated through proteolytic cleavage of the full-length protein4. In yeast, the aggregation pattern of Htt exon-1 mimics that of mammalian cells; the protein with a glutamine stretch of 25 repeats is soluble in the cytoplasm, while repeat lengths of 47 or more lead to protein aggregation and the formation of typical IBs5. Initially, such IBs of exon-1 were suggested to be the cause of HD, but recent studies have suggested that smaller exon-1 oligomers/aggregates are the toxic conformers6–8. In line with this notion, chaperones, peptides, and prion-like proteins that either prevent/reduce oligomer production5, 9–12 or convert small aggregates/oligomers into IBs13, 14 can suppress the toxicity of the exon-1 fragment6, 15. Htt toxicity is also dependent on sequences flanking the polyQ repeat12, 16. For example, the removal of the proline-rich region directly C-terminal of the expanded polyQ stretch (Htt103Q) results in the formation of multiple amorphous-like aggregates rather than one or two large inclusions12. Interestingly, these amorphous aggregates of Htt103Q are severely toxic in yeast cells, whereas the inclusions of the native, proline-rich region-containing Htt103QP, are not12. However, it is not clear how this involvement of the proline-rich region in relieving Htt toxicity is pertinent to HD as the proline-rich region is supposedly always present in exon-1.
In this study, using Htt exon-1 as a model polyQ protein and yeast as a model organism, we performed a genome-wide screen for polyQ toxicity and found that soluble exon-1 interacts both genetically and physically, in a proline-rich region-dependent manner, with type-1 myosin motor proteins (Myo3/Myo5). Our analysis further revealed that soluble Htt exon-1 is highly toxic in cells with a reduced activity in early, actin- and type-1 myosin-dependent, endocytosis and that aggregation of Htts with polyQ expansions mitigates such toxicity. The results imply that in some genetic landscapes, the expansion of polyQ to aggregation-prone, disease-related, Htts might be under positive selection.
Results
Htt exon-1 is toxic in yeast cells defective in actin nucleation
The HTT constructs used in this study for ectopic expression in yeast are presented in Fig. 1a. In our toxicity studies of expanded polyQ Htts in different yeast mutants, we noticed that the typically non-toxic and soluble, wild type, Htt25QP was in fact more toxic than Htt103QP in cells lacking the formin Bni1 (Fig. 1b). Fluorescence microscopy did not reveal any Htt25QP foci (aggregates) and the expression pattern of the GFP-tagged exon-1 constructs in the bni1Δ strain was similar to that seen in wild type cells (Fig. 1c), indicating that the toxicity of Htt25QP was not due to aggregate formation or elevated expression. To determine if the Htt25QP protein in a bni1Δ strain formed toxic oligomers too small to be detected by normal fluorescence microscopy, we performed native gel electrophoresis and sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation of protein extracts from a wild type and a bni1Δ strain, each expressing HTT25QP and found that there was no discernable difference in Htt25QP oligomer composition between the two strains (Fig. 1d and e). This suggests that the toxicity of Htt25QP in bni1Δ cells is unlinked to protein aggregation/oligomer formation. As expected, the Htt103QP protein formed almost exclusively large, SDS-insoluble, inclusions (Fig. 1d).
Reduced function in actin-dependent endocytosis renders Htt25QP, but not Htt25Q, toxic
To determine if the deletion of other genes rendered soluble Htt25QP toxic, we performed a synthetic genetic array (SGA) screen to uncover processes affected by Htt. HTT25QP and HTT25Q were crossed into a yeast deletion library and genes showing negative genetic interactions with HTT25QP and HTT25Q are presented in supplementary Table S1. Gene ontology and functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that while HTT25Q displayed negative genetic interactions with genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and chromatin regulation (Fig. 2a), HTT25QP displayed many additional interactions, including negative genetic interactions with genes encoding actin cytoskeleton components (Fig. 2b). To verify the link between Htt25QP and the actin cytoskeleton, we tested the sensitivity to the actin monomer-sequestering drug Latrunculin A, which leads to depolymerization of F-actin structures (rings, cables and patches) and found that expression of HTT25QP resulted in an increased Latrunculin A sensitivity compared to the control and HTT25Q (Fig. 2c and d). Expression of HTT25QP appears to affect the actin cytoskeleton rather than the microtubule network as the microtubule depolymerizing drug benomyl, did not result in increased sensitivity to Htt25QP (Fig. S1).
Htt25QP impedes endocytosis in yeast cells deficient in type-1 myosin motor activity
Genes involved in the formation of cortical actin patches and clathrin-mediated endocytosis, including the type-1 myosin MYO5, were highly enriched among the genetic interactors of HTT25QP (Fig. 2e).
Myo5 is one of the two type-1 myosin motor proteins (Myo5 and Myo3) in yeast and is a central component in early clathrin-dependent endocytosis and actin patch formation. Therefore, we tested the effect of Htt25QP and Htt25Q on endocytosis in cells lacking MYO5, demonstrating that without Myo5, Htt25QP, but not Htt25Q, dramatically reduces endocytic uptake of FM4-64 (Fig. 3a and b) after the dye had being incorporated in the plasma membrane (Fig. S2). The myo5∆ mutation on its own did not affect cellular growth rate (Fig. S10) or the rate of endocytosis (see below). The data indicates that the proline-rich region is required for Htt to affect actin-dependent endocytosis (Fig. 3a and b). In the myo5Δ mutant cells (as was the case for bni1Δ cells), Htt25QP toxicity was not linked to increased aggregate (Fig. 3a) or oligomer (Fig. 3c and d) formation. Htt25QP did not form aggregates in the myo5∆ mutant (Fig. 3e), similar to the bni1∆ mutant (Fig. 1c).
Type-I myosins bind specifically to Htt25QP
The fact that the Htt toxicity in the cytoskeletal mutants identified was seen only for Htt25QP and not Htt25Q, suggests that the proline-rich region is important for interactions, genetic and/or physical, with proteins involved in actin/clathrin-dependent endocytosis. We therefore hypothesized that Htt25QP may sequester proteins required for actin-dependent endocytosis and when removing one component of this process, by deleting the corresponding gene, Htt25QP may become more toxic since more Htt25QP would be available for interaction with the residual components of actin/clathrin-dependent endocytosis. It is known that proline-rich regions can bind SH3 domains17, 18. Interestingly, proteins encoded by several of the negative genetic interactors of HTT25QP identified in our SGA screen contain one or several SH3 domains (Fig. 4a).
We tested these proteins in an in vitro binding assay and found that Myo5 bound to Htt25QP, whereas no specific binding to Htt25Q could be detected (Fig. 4b), suggesting that the poline-rich region is required for myosin binding. Whether the proline-rich region is sufficient for binding is not presently known, however. Other SH3 domain-containing proteins than Myo5 identified in our SGA screen, Sla1, Bzz1, and Rvs167, did not show a specific binding to Htt25QP. Similar to Myo5, the other type-1 myosin, Myo3, was also found to bind to Htt25QP but not to Htt25Q (Fig. 4c). This suggests that the interaction between type-1 myosins and the proline-rich region of Htt25QP involves either additional regions to the SH3 domain or other type-1 myosin specific regions. Cells lacking Myo3, however, did not show a negative genetic interaction with HTT25QP in the SGA screen and did not exhibit sensitivity towards Htt25QP when tested manually (Fig. S3). This can either be explained by Myo5 being more abundant than Myo319–22 or that Myo5 possesses some functions absent in Myo3 (see below)23. A double myo5 and myo3 deletion has been reported previously to cause severe defects in both growth and endocytosis24. We next tested if the polyQ extended Htt (Htt103QP) in its soluble form was still capable of binding Myo5 and found this to be the case (Fig. 4b).
Htt25QP titrates type-1 myosins leading to defects in actin polarity and endocytosis
As both Myo5 and Myo3 are important for the polarization of the actin cytoskeleton and endocytosis, these proteins were analyzed further with regard to their involvement in Htt25QP toxicity. We tested if the expression of HTT25QP is affecting the localization of Myo5 within the cell. During CME, type-1 myosins are recruited to endocytic sites (patches) at the plasma membrane to positively regulate actin polymerization24, 25. When comparing wild type yeast cells with an mRuby-tagged Myo5, either expressing HTT25QP or HTT25Q, we found that the presence of Htt25QP led to a reduction in Myo5 patches at the plasma membrane compared to Htt25Q (Fig. S4). Further, we found that overexpression of MYO3 partly suppressed the toxicity of Htt25QP in myo5Δ cells, suggesting that soluble Htt25QP is sequestering type-1 myosins, preventing them from performing their normal functions in the cell (Figs 5a,b and S5). In addition, we found that the reduced polarization (Figs 5c and d and S6) and endocytic uptake (Figs 5e and f and S7) displayed by myo5Δ cells expressing HTT25QP could be partly suppressed by overexpression of MYO3 (Fig. 5c,d,e,f and Figs S6 and S7). As described previously26, Htt103QP caused a collapse in the actin cytoskeleton and reduced endocytic uptake on its own but endocytosis was not further reduced by deleting MYO5 and could not be suppressed by overexpressing MYO3 (Fig. 5e and f). Thus, we conclude that Htt103QP is causing problems in endocytosis by a mechanism distinct from that of Htt25QP. Co-staining for Htt25QP-GFP or Htt103QP-GFP clearly showed that it was the cells with high expression of either HTT25QP or HTT103QP that had severe problems in endocytosis (Fig. S7), after FM4-64 had been incorporated into the plasma membrane (Fig. S8).
The pattern of Htt polyQ length-dependent toxicity is altered in cytoskeleton/endocytosis mutants
Similar to bni1Δ cells, the cytoskeleton/endocytosis mutants identified in the screen displayed an altered pattern of sensitivity to the different HTT exon-1 constructs, in comparison to wild type cells, as revealed by toxicity tests on both plates (Figs 6 and S9) and in liquid (Fig. S10). Apart from the fact that the proline-rich region was required for toxicity in all mutants tested, the Htt25QP protein displayed a higher degree of toxicity compared to the polyQ expanded variant Htt103QP in many of the mutants (Figs 6 and S9). There were no mutant strains among the ones tested that showed a significantly higher level of the Htt proteins compared to the wild type strain (Fig. S11), demonstrating that the growth reduction observed was not a trivial result of elevated expression.
Htt polyQ expansions may be selected in cytoskeleton/endocytosis mutants
The data presented raise the question of whether there may be an evolutionary pressure for polyQ expansion in some cells and tissues depending on the activity and/or abundance of their endocytic machinery. To address if the aggregating version of Htt (Htt103QP) is favored over the soluble one (Htt25QP) in some mutants with reduced endocytosis, we performed a competition assay where equal cell numbers of two isogenic strains expressing HTT25QP or HTT103QP, were mixed and then grown for five days with dilutions to prevent saturation of the culture (Fig. 7a). Samples were taken every 24 hours and two different techniques were used to quantify competition; a PCR-based method to distinguish the abundance of HTT103QP and HTT25QP gene copies and Western blots to determine the abundance of the corresponding proteins. Both gene copy number and protein level analysis showed clearly that in wild type cells the aggregating Htt103QP is under negative selection as cells producing Htt103QP are rapidly outcompeted by cells producing the soluble Htt25QP (Fig. 7b). In contrast, the mutants myo5Δ, rvs161Δ, and arc18Δ showed the opposite pattern, where cells producing Htt103QP were in excess after five days of cultivation (Fig. 7b). The change in ratio between the two strains over the five days is presented in Fig. 7b, where a ratio higher than 1 indicates a positive selection for HTT103QP expressing cells and ratios lower than 1 a selection for HTT25QP expressing cells. These results indicate that in genetic backgrounds displaying a low activity in actin-dependent endocytosis, there is a positive selection for polyQ expansion in Htt. Un-induced cultures (with raffinose as carbon source) were analyzed in parallel to ensure that the differences observed were due to the production of Htt proteins rather than a difference in the propagation of plasmids. No difference in the HTT103QP/HTT25QP ratio could be detected over the generations in either wild type or mutant cells in these experiments demonstrating that the selections observed were due to the production of Htt proteins (Fig. 7c).
Discussion
The SGA analysis demonstrated first, that many more functional groups of genes are required to buffer against inherent toxicity of Htt25QP than Htt25Q and second, that many of those groups of genes are functionally related to actin-dependent, clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Fig. 2). We further linked this toxicity of Htt25QP to reduced functions in endocytosis and actin patch polarity (Fig. 5) and expression of HTT25QP increases the sensitivity of yeast to Latrunculin A, suggesting a role for Htt in processes mediated by actin. Several proteins involved in actin cytoskeleton-dependent processes contain SH3 domains, a domain that has been shown to interact with specific proline-rich motifs17, 18, 27, 28. Thus, interactions between the proline-rich region of exon-1 and SH3 domains of specific proteins could lead to toxicity. However, Sla1, Bzz1, and Rvs167, which all contain SH3 domains, did not interact with Htt25QP suggesting that its interaction with type-1 myosins is more specific (Fig. 8). That Htt25QP might cause limitations in type-1 myosin activity is supported by Htt25QP binding to both Myo5 and Myo3 (Fig. 4) and that overproduction of Myo3 in cells lacking Myo5 led to a reduction of the Htt25QP-induced toxicity and partially suppressed failures in endocytosis and polarity (Fig. 5). The fact that cells lacking Myo5, but not Myo3, displayed sensitivity towards Htt25QP may be due to Myo3 being the less abundant type-1 myosin19–22 and that the residual activity provided by Myo5 in myo3Δ cells was sufficient even in the presence of interacting Htt25QP.
The toxicity of soluble Htt25QP, as opposed to the aggregating Htt103QP, in yeast mutants expected to display reduced activity in actin- and clathrin-dependent processes, raises the question of whether polyQ expansions could be under selective pressure under some genetic and/or environmental conditions also in humans. Samples from patients with HD have shown that different somatic tissues suffer from different CAG repeat instabilities within an individual, where the brain regions most affected by neuronal death show the greatest repeat size disparity29, 30. In addition, it has been suggested that such differential polyQ expansions in tissues and cells cannot be explained simply by differential cell proliferation allowing for variation by stochastic accumulation of CAG extensions29. Whether such expansions in some cases may be under positive selection needs to be investigated further.
Materials and Methods
Yeast strains and plasmids
Experiments were performed in BY4741 (MAT a his3Δ1 leu2Δ met15Δ ura3Δ) which is referred to as wild type. Deletion mutants have the gene of interest replaced by the KanMX4 cassette (EUROSCARF, Frankfurt, Germany) and strains with TAP-tagged genes were from the yeast TAP-tagged ORF library (GE Healthcare, Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO). A wild type strain with a chromosomally integrated plasmid containing pGPD GFP (pPW371) was used for binding of GFP to beads. MYO5 was C-terminally tagged with mRuby2-Leu2 (from pFA6a-link-yomRuby2-Leu2) by transformation using a PCR product with 70 bp of homology to the region of interest. The GFP-tagged HTT constructs expressed from the GAL1 promoter in the 2 µ pYES2 vector were described previously31, 32. The control plasmid is pYES2-GFP 33. The 2 µ MoBY plasmids p5587 (vector control) and p5819-MYO3 were used in MYO3 overexpression experiments.
Growth conditions
Cells were grown at 30 °C in Synthetic drop out media containing 2% raffinose. For induction of the GFP proteins, 1% or 2% galactose was added to the growing culture for 4 hours. For culturing TAP-tagged strains, SD complete media containing 2% glucose was used. For drop tests, exponentially growing cells were cultured in SD-ura or SD-ura-leu containing 2% raffinose and diluted to an optical density of 0.1 or 0.5 followed by dilutions. 5 µl of each dilution was spotted onto appropriate solid media containing 2% galactose (1% galactose and 1% raffinose for strains rvs161Δ and rvs167Δ) for induction of GFP-tagged proteins. Htt toxicity was quantified using ImageJ by calculating the sum of the pixel values in selected areas (RawIntDen) with background subtractions. The degree of toxicity was plotted as 1 - average RawIntDen without background relative to the control for each strain.
Synthetic genetic array analysis
The plasmids pYES2-HTT25QP-GFP and pYES2-HTT25Q-GFP (including the control) were transformed into yeast in Y7092 background to construct the query strains. The SGA screens of HTT25QP and HTT25Q were performed in duplicate as described before34, 35. The screens used the SINGER ROTOR HDA Robot (Singer Instrument Co. Ltd., Somerset, United Kingdom). Functional enrichment analysis was performed using the SGD online analysis software GO Term Finder with the SGA-V2 array as the background list.
Fluorescence imaging
Imaging was performed using standard fluorescence microscopy with a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), equipped with an AxioCam MRm Rev.3 camera (Zeiss) and a Plan-Apochromat 100x/1.40 objective (Zeiss).
Protein extraction
Harvested cells were washed twice in cold water before extraction of proteins. Cells were lysed either by using NaOH and β-mercaptoethanol or by using a FastPrep (MP Bioscience, United Kingdom). When using a FastPrep, 1 volume of cells was mixed with 1.3 volumes of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT and protease inhibitor), where after the cells were broken by glass beads (500 µm in diameter) by 6 rounds of beating, at speed 6.5 for 30 second intervals with 2 minute incubations on ice in between. The lysates were diluted in 4 cell volumes of lysis buffer and cleared by several rounds of centrifugation at approx. 20000 g at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were determined using the DC Protein assay kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA).
Immunoblotting
Proteins were separated by SDS or Native PAGE and transferred to either a PVDF (Immobilon FL PVDF 0.45 µm, Millipore, Billerica, MA) or a nitrocellulose (Amersham Protran 0.45 µm NC, GE healthcare, Chicago, IL) membranes using standard methods. Antibodies used were anti-GFP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and anti-CBP (Millipore). Signals were visualized using an Odyssey IR scanner (LI-CORE Biosciences, Lincoln, NE).
Native PAGE
Proteins were extracted using the FastPrep method and a total of 20 µg protein was loaded onto each well of a 3–8% Criterion™ XT Tris-Acetate protein gel (BioRad). Protein complexes were resolved on ice at 100 V for approximately 5 hours.
Sucrose density gradient fractionation
Proteins were extracted using the FastPrep method and 2 mg protein was loaded onto a 10–40% (w/v) continuous sucrose density gradient and size-fractionated by centrifugation at 85,000 g av for 18 hours at 4 °C. Fractions were mixed with SDS loading buffer, boiled and analyzed on NuPAGE (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) SDS gels.
Latrunculin A and Benomyl sensitivity tests
Exponentially growing wild type cells containing the GFP-tagged constructs were cultured in SD-ura 2% raffinose and approximately 7.5 × 105 cells were plated onto solid media containing 2% galactose. The center of the plate contained a filter disc (6 mm diameter from BD BBL (Fisher Scientific)) soaked in 10 µl of 1 mM Latrunculin A (Enzo Life Science, Farmingdale, NY). Plates were incubated at 30 °C for two to three days and the halo area of no growth measured. For Benomyl tests, exponentially growing cells were diluted to an OD of 0.1 or 0.5 followed by serial dilutions of which 5 µl was spotted onto SD-ura 2% galactose solid media containing 0.15 µg/ml benomyl or DMSO. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for three days.
Endocytosis assay
Exponentially growing cells were induced for 4 hours in 2% galactose to allow for the production of GFP and Htt-GFP proteins. Cells were washed in 5 ml cold YP, re-suspended in 250 µl cold YP containing 20 µg/ml FM4-64 (N-(3-Triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4-(Diethylamino) Phenyl) Hexatrienyl) Pyridinium Dibromide; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and stained in darkness for 30 minutes in ice/water slurry. After being re-suspended in 5 ml cold YP a 1 ml sample, corresponding to time point zero, was washed one more time in cold YP and stored on ice. The remaining cells were spun down and re-suspended in 4 ml pre-warmed YP containing 2% galactose. Endocytosis was initiated by incubating the cells at 30 °C followed by a 30 min chase. Samples (1 ml) were washed twice in cold YP and stored on ice until analysis. Z-stacks were imaged for visible FM4-64 stained vesicle(s).
In vitro binding assay
Igepal (final concentration 0.2%) was added to protein extracts and after being cleared, the extracts were incubated with 20 µl GFP-trap agarose beads (Chromotek, Planegg, Germany) for 45 minutes at 4 °C on a rotary wheel. Beads with immobilized GFP proteins were washed three times in 1 ml of lysis buffer containing 0.2% Igepal followed by a 1 hour incubation at 4 °C on a rotary wheel together with protein extracts from cells with TAP-tagged proteins. Beads were then washed and proteins bound to the beads eluted with SDS sample buffer, boiled, and resolved on NuPAGE SDS gels.
RT-PCR
Cells were grown in SD-ura with 2% glucose to an OD of ~1.0 followed by total RNA extraction using a hot acid phenol extraction protocol described in ref. 36. A second RNA isolation was performed using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). 1 µg of DNase I treated RNA was used as template for cDNA synthesis, with 3.57 µM random hexamers (Thermo scientific) and reverse transcriptase (Thermo scientific). DNA products of MYO3 and CUP1 (control) was amplified by standard real-time PCRs using appropriate primers (available on request), SYBR green (BioRad), and the Bio-Rad Q5 system.
Actin polarization assay
Cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature, washed in PBS, and stained for F-actin with Rhodamine-Phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 90 minutes at room temperature followed by washing. Mother cells having >6 cortical actin patches were scored as depolarized.
Competition assay
Cells were first grown as individual cultures to mid log in SD-ura 2% raffinose. Equal cell numbers from each culture were then combined in a new culture and samples for PCR and Western blot analysis were taken. Galactose with a final concentration of 2% was added, after which the cells were allowed to grow at 30 °C for five days. Samples were taken before a daily dilution of the culture to an OD of 0.1. For quantifying the gene ratio of HTT103QP/HTT25QP, primers were designed to anneal outside the polyQ stretch in the HTT-GFP constructs (Htt N17 fw: GGCCTTCGAGTCCCTCAAAA and int GFP rev: CTTGTAGTTGCCGTCGTCCT). PCR was performed with purified total DNA from the mixed culture as template. PCR products were subsequently run on a 1% agarose gel. Protein ratios of Htt103QP/Htt25QP were measured in parallel by making a whole cell extract.
Statistical analysis
Data in graphs are presented as mean +/− standard deviation or standard error of the mean of triplicates and were analyzed using an unpaired two tailed student’s t-test.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The HTT25QP and HTT25Q plasmid (pYES2-HTT25QP-GFP and pYES2-HTT25QP-GFP) were gifts from Dr. M. Sherman (Boston University, USA), the control plasmid pYES2-GFP was a gift from Dr. C. Forestier (CEA, France), and the MoBY plasmids p5587 (vector control) and p5819-MYO3 were gifts from Charles Boone (University of Toronto, Canada). This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Natural Research Council (VR) (T.N. and B.L.), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Wallenberg Scholar) (T.N.), ERC (Advanced grant; QualiAge) (T.N.), the Swedish Cancer Society (B.L.), the Carl Trygger Foundation (B.L. and J.G.), the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under REA grant agreement n° 608743 (B.L.), Olle Engkvist foundation (J.G.), and Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhället i Göteborg (KVVS) (L.B.).
Author Contributions
T.N. and L.B. designed the experiments and the outline of this project. J.G. and L.B. designed the physical binding assays, size fractionations and Latrunculin A assays. B.L. and X.H. designed and performed the SGA screen and analyzed the data. L.B. performed all other experiments. T.N. L.B. and J.G. wrote the manuscript with input from B.L.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11102-6
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.MacDonald ME, et al. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell. 1993;72:971–983. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mangiarini L, et al. Exon 1 of the HD Gene with an Expanded CAG Repeat Is Sufficient to Cause a Progressive Neurological Phenotype in Transgenic Mice. Cell. 1996;87:493–506. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Davies SW, et al. Formation of Neuronal Intranuclear Inclusions Underlies the Neurological Dysfunction in Mice Transgenic for the HD Mutation. Cell. 1997;90:537–548. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80513-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Landles C, et al. Proteolysis of mutant huntingtin produces an exon 1 fragment that accumulates as an aggregated protein in neuronal nuclei in Huntington disease. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:8808–8823. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.075028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krobitsch S, Lindquist S. Aggregation of huntingtin in yeast varies with the length of the polyglutamine expansion and the expression of chaperone proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97:1589–1594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arrasate M, Mitra S, Schweitzer ES, Segal MR, Finkbeiner S. Inclusion body formation reduces levels of mutant huntingtin and the risk of neuronal death. Nature. 2004;431:805–810. doi: 10.1038/nature02998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arrasate M, Finkbeiner S. Automated microscope system for determining factors that predict neuronal fate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:3840–3845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409777102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim YE, et al. Soluble Oligomers of PolyQ-Expanded Huntingtin Target a Multiplicity of Key Cellular Factors. Mol Cell. 2016;63:951–964. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Muchowski PJ, et al. Hsp70 and hsp40 chaperones can inhibit self-assembly of polyglutamine proteins into amyloid-like fibrils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97:7841–7846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.140202897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gokhale KC, Newnam GP, Sherman MY, Chernoff YO. Modulation of prion-dependent polyglutamine aggregation and toxicity by chaperone proteins in the yeast model. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:22809–22818. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500390200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Behrends C, et al. Chaperonin TRiC promotes the assembly of polyQ expansion proteins into nontoxic oligomers. Mol Cell. 2006;23:887–897. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dehay B, Bertolotti A. Critical role of the proline-rich region in Huntingtin for aggregation and cytotoxicity in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:35608–35615. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605558200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kayatekin C, et al. Prion-like proteins sequester and suppress the toxicity of huntingtin exon 1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111:12085–12090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412504111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wolfe KJ, Ren HY, Trepte P, Cyr DM. Polyglutamine-rich suppressors of huntingtin toxicity act upstream of Hsp70 and Sti1 in spatial quality control of amyloid-like proteins. PloS one. 2014;9:e95914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miller J, et al. Identifying polyglutamine protein species in situ that best predict neurodegeneration. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:925–934. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duennwald ML, Jagadish S, Muchowski PJ, Lindquist S. Flanking sequences profoundly alter polyglutamine toxicity in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:11045–11050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604547103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kay BK, Williamson MP, Sudol M. The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 2000;14:231–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mirey G, Soulard A, Orange C, Friant S, Winsor B. SH3 domain-containing proteins and the actin cytoskeleton in yeast. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:1247–1249. doi: 10.1042/BST0331247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ghaemmaghami S, et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature. 2003;425:737–741. doi: 10.1038/nature02046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Newman JR, et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature. 2006;441:840–846. doi: 10.1038/nature04785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kulak NA, Pichler G, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods. 2014;11:319–324. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chong YT, et al. Yeast Proteome Dynamics from Single Cell Imaging and Automated Analysis. Cell. 2015;161:1413–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Galletta BJ, Chuang DY, Cooper JA. Distinct roles for Arp2/3 regulators in actin assembly and endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e1. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goodson HV, Anderson BL, Warrick HM, Pon LA, Spudich JA. Synthetic lethality screen identifies a novel yeast myosin I gene (MYO5): myosin I proteins are required for polarization of the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 1996;133:1277–1291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.6.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun Y, Martin AC, Drubin DG. Endocytic internalization in budding yeast requires coordinated actin nucleation and myosin motor activity. Dev Cell. 2006;11:33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang, J., Hao, X., Cao, X., Liu, B. & Nystrom, T. Spatial sequestration and detoxification of Huntingtin by the ribosome quality control complex. Elife5, doi:10.7554/eLife.11792 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Harjes P. & Wanker, E. E. The hunt for huntingtin function: interaction partners tell many different stories. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:425–433. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00168-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao Y-G, et al. Structural Insights into the Specific Binding of Huntingtin Proline-Rich Region with the SH3 and WW Domains. Structure. 2006;14:1755–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Telenius H, et al. Somatic and gonadal mosaicism of the Huntington disease gene CAG repeat in brain and sperm. Nat Genet. 1994;6:409–414. doi: 10.1038/ng0494-409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kennedy L, et al. Dramatic tissue-specific mutation length increases are an early molecular event in Huntington disease pathogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:3359–3367. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Meriin AB, et al. Endocytosis machinery is involved in aggregation of proteins with expanded polyglutamine domains. FASEB J. 2007;21:1915–1925. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6878com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y, et al. Abnormal proteins can form aggresome in yeast: aggresome-targeting signals and components of the machinery. FASEB J. 2009;23:451–463. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-117614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Preveral S, Ansoborlo E, Mari S, Vavasseur A, Forestier C. Metal(loid)s and radionuclides cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Role of YCF1, glutathione and effect of buthionine sulfoximine. Biochimie. 2006;88:1651–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tong AH, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science. 2001;294:2364–2368. doi: 10.1126/science.1065810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tong AH, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science. 2004;303:808–813. doi: 10.1126/science.1091317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Methods in enzymology. 1991;194:3–21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.