Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Sep 14;5(37):e00877-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00877-17

Draft Genome Sequence of Corynebacterium kefirresidentii SB, Isolated from Kefir

Sonja Blasche 1, Yongkyu Kim 1, Kiran R Patil 1,
PMCID: PMC5597753  PMID: 28912312

ABSTRACT

The genus Corynebacterium includes Gram-positive species with a high G+C content. We report here a novel species, Corynebacterium kefirresidentii SB, isolated from kefir grains collected in Germany. Its draft genome sequence was remarkably dissimilar (average nucleotide identity, 76.54%) to those of other Corynebacterium spp., confirming that this is a unique novel species.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Kefir grains are traditionally used as starters in the production of kefir fermented milk. They contain a stable consortium composed of 40 to 50 different species, both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (1). Among the bacterial species, acetic acid bacteria and lactic acid bacteria, including Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Leuconostoc spp., are dominant and play important roles in milk fermentation and kefir flavor (2). So far, the functional role of other low-abundance species remains unknown. Here, we isolated Corynebacterium kefirresidentii SB from a kefir grain collected from a private source in Offenberg, Germany.

C. kefirresidentii SB (internal stock no. 285) was isolated from ground kefir grains (internal name, Kefir OG2), plated in serial dilutions on tomato juice agar (TJA), and grown for 2 days at 30°C. The isolated clone was suspended in TES buffer (25 mM Tris, 10 mM EDTA, and 10 mM sucrose) and digested with lysozyme for 30 min at 37°C, followed by two bead-beating steps (30 s, 6.5 m/s) with an intermediate break of 1 min. Cells were lysed by addition of 3% SDS for 5 min at room temperature, followed by proteinase K (0.2 mg/ml final concentration) digestion for 30 min at 37°C. Digested protein was precipitated for 15 min on ice in 1 M potassium acetate (final concentration) and centrifuged for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was purified using standard phenol-chloroform extraction. DNA was precipitated by the addition of 2 volumes of ice-cold isopropanol and washed with 70% ethanol at 4°C.

DNA library creation and sequencing were done at the EMBL Genomics Core Facility (Heidelberg, Germany). It was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 100-bp paired-end reads. A total of 3,941,660 read pairs were generated. The raw reads were assessed for the quality-based trimming and filtering by PRINSEQ (3). The qualifying read pairs were assembled using SPAdes 3.10.0 (4). Contigs shorter than 500 bp were discarded. The total number of contigs in the scaffold is 81, with the largest contig of 579,517 bp and an N50 value of 94,942 bp. The draft genome size is 2,522,639 bp, with a G+C content of 58.47%.

The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) identified the genome as harboring 2,642 protein-coding genes, 51 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes (2, 1, and 1, respectively, for 5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA) (5).

Accession number(s).

The NCBI accession number of this whole-genome sequence is NGUZ00000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (grant number 031A601B) as a part of the ERASysAPP project SysMilk.

DNA sequencing libraries were created and sequenced at the EMBL Genomics Core Facility.

Footnotes

Citation Blasche S, Kim Y, Patil KR. 2017. Draft genome sequence of Corynebacterium kefirresidentii SB, isolated from kefir. Genome Announc 5:e00877-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00877-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Marsh AJ, O’Sullivan O, Hill C, Ross RP, Cotter PD. 2013. Sequencing-based analysis of the bacterial and fungal composition of kefir grains and milks from multiple sources. PLoS One 8:e69371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walsh AM, Crispie F, Kilcawley K, O’Sullivan O, O’Sullivan MG, Claesson MJ, Cotter PD. 2016. Microbial succession and flavor production in the fermented dairy beverage kefir. mSystems 1(5):e00052-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00052-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmieder R, Edwards R. 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES