Abstract
Nannochloropsis oculata is a marine-water microalgae that is considered to be a good source of omega-3 fatty acids, specifically eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), utilized in the production of an omega-3 oil for use as a dietary supplement. This study investigates the safety of N. oculata in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats administered a 0 or 10 mL/kg bw/rat N. oculata (10E8 viable cells/mL) suspension by oral gavage once daily for 14 consecutive days. No mortalities occurred and no signs of toxicity were observed during the study. No treatment-related effects were seen for body weight, food consumption, urinalysis, clinical chemistry, hematology, gross pathology, organ weights, or histopathology. Although statistically significant effects were noted for some endpoints, none were considered to be of toxicological significance. The N. oculata suspension was concluded to have no toxicity in rats, confirming that the algal strain used in the production of omega-3 oil is not pathogenic when administered orally to rats.
Keywords: Nannochloropsis oculata, Omega-3, Eicosapentaenoic acid, Algae, EPA, Rat
1. Introduction
Nannochloropsis oculata is a marine-water single-celled algae of the Eustigmatophyceae class. It is one of six species of algae found in the genus Nannochloropsis and was originally isolated off the coast of Scotland [1]. Nannochloropsis sp. has been utilized as a food source in aquaculture, providing a source of omega-3 fatty acids [2]. Recently a N. oculata-derived oil has been determined safe for use in dietary supplements [3]. Furthermore, the nutritional evaluation of a Nannochloropsis sp. found it to have high levels of protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and antioxidant pigments [4]. The algae is described as a phototrophic unicellular, non-zoospore producing, free-floating algae having a diameter of 2–4 μm, growing non-axenically in a temperature of 11–16 °C. The cells contain yellow-green parietal chloroplasts [1], [2].
The 14-day toxicity study was performed under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) conditions according to the OECD [5] guidelines for the testing of chemicals. The suspension containing N. oculata was tested orally in rats to assess its toxicity and/or pathogenicity according to a modified study of the guidelines of OPPTS 885.3050.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Test item
N. oculata suspension (Lot No. 91020140001; Qualitas Health Inc.) is a green-colored suspension of microalgae. The source biomass, N. oculata, was grown in shallow, open-air, plastic-lined ponds in a proprietary growth medium consisting of food grade plant fertilizers and nutrients [4]. The algae was harvested and suspended in deionized water resulting in a live algal biomass (w/w%) of <0.2% in deionized water. Toxin analyses conducted on N. oculata indicated that no natural product toxins were detected above detection limits including microcystins/nodularin, anatoxin-a, cylindrospermopsin, paralytic shellfish toxin/saxitoxins, okadaic acid and brevetoxins & domoic acid [6]. The N. oculata suspension was prepared by Qualitas Health Inc. and supplied to the lab for testing as viable cultures. The suspension was stored by refrigeration (2–8 °C).
2.2. Animals and housing
A total of 40 (20 male and 20 female) 7–8 week old Sprague-Dawley rats bred in-house by Advinus Therapeutics Ltd. (Bangalore, India) were housed in standard polysulfone cages (2/cage) with stainless steel top grills. Steam sterilized corn cob was used as bedding and changed along with the cage twice a week. Cages were placed on five-tier rack. The animals were acclimatized for 5 days prior to the start of treatment. Initial mean group body weights ranged from 189 to 191 g for the male rats and 153 to 155 g for the female rats. Room temperature was maintained at 20–24 °C with a relative humidity of 65–67%, a minimum of 13.7 air changes/h and a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle. Filtered deep-bore well water and Teklad Global 14% protein rodent maintenance diet (Harlan Laboratories, An Venray, The Netherlands) were provided ad libitum. Animal handling was performed according to the requirements of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC).
2.3. Experimental design
The potential toxicity or pathogenicity of a microorganism is generally assessed in accordance with the US Environmental Protection Agency Microbial Pesticide Test Guidelines OPPTS 885.3030 during which the survival and propagation of the microorganism in the rat are evaluated by culturing tissue samples, blood, and feces following a single high exposure and an adequate post-exposure observation period [7]. For the current study, the purpose was not only to determine whether or not the microorganism was toxic in its natural state, but to also determine its toxicity in the rat following ingestion. Furthermore, the current study was designed to determine if the organism could manage to replicate itself in organs and tissue of the host and eventually become a danger to the health of the animal. However, since N. oculata is a phototropic vegetable species and typically does not replicate without the presence of light, a modified version of the OPPTS study protocol is used that removed the steps to culture algae in tissue samples by using a 14-day oral administration of the test item to rats to provide information on its toxicity and pathogenicity.
Two groups of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10 rats/sex/group) were administered (via oral gavage) 0 and 10 mL/kg N. oculata suspension (providing a minimum of 10E8 viable cells/animal) respectively, once daily for 14 days. Vehicle control animals were administered by purified water. In order to determine the concentration of viable algal cells, 1 mL of the test material was evaluated daily and the algal cell counts were determined using a haemocytometer. Dead cells were identified by their loss of chlorophyll and were excluded from the cell count. There were no dead cells observed during the cell counts. The concentrations of viable algal cells in the N. oculata suspension were in the range of 1.10 × 10E8 to 1.32 × 10E8 viable algal cells/mL throughout the study (Table 1). Doses were administered using disposable plastic syringes, attached with a stainless steel metal feeding cannula. Following the treatment period, all animals were sacrificed on day 15.
Table 1.
Treatment day | Cell count (viable algal cells/mL) |
---|---|
1 | 1.21 × 10E08 |
2 | 1.28 × 10E08 |
3 | 1.32 × 10E08 |
4 | 1.25 × 10E08 |
5 | 1.27 × 10E08 |
6 | 1.14 × 10E08 |
7 | 1.18 × 10E08 |
8 | 1.23 × 10E08 |
9 | 1.12 × 10E08 |
10 | 1.15 × 10E08 |
11 | 1.10 × 10E08 |
12 | 1.16 × 10E08 |
13 | 1.20 × 10E08 |
14 | 1.16 × 10E08 |
Rats were observed twice daily for signs of morbidity and mortality and clinical signs until study termination. The food was analyzed and found to be below established maximum levels for heavy metals, mycotoxins (Aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2), chlorinated hydrocarbons and organophosphates. The food was composed mainly of 14% protein, 4% fat and 4% fiber, as is typical for diets for this species and strain of rat. Drinking water was analyzed and found acceptable as a potable water source for the area (Bangalore, India). Body weights were recorded on day 1 prior to the test item administration and on days 4, 7, 11, and 14. Fasting body weights were recorded prior to necropsy on day 15. Food consumption was measured on days 4, 7, 11, and 14. At the end of the study, rats were fasted overnight (water allowed), anaesthetized with isoflurane, and exsanguinated.
Blood was collected from the retro-orbital sinus plexus with fine capillary tubes. An aliquot of blood was collected in tubes containing 3.2% sodium citrate solution for determination of coagulation parameters and the remaining blood was collected into k2EDTA and lithium heparinized tubes for hematology and clinical chemistry examinations.
Prior to sacrifice, urine was collected in urine collection tubes for all rats. Each rat was placed in specially fabricated cages overnight (water allowed) and the next morning (day 18) the urine was collected for analysis. Urinalysis parameters examined in the collected samples included color, clarity, bilirubin, glucose, ketone bodies, nitrite, proteins, pH, specific gravity, urobilinogen, and volume. Urine was also subjected to microscopic examination for sediments such as crystals, epithelial cells, erythrocytes, leukocytes and casts.
All animals were fasted overnight prior to terminal sacrifice on day 19. At the scheduled termination, all rats were euthanized by exsanguination under isoflurane anesthesia. The organs identified in Table 2 were removed, weighed and/or examined for gross pathological anomalies. Histopathological examinations were carried out on the preserved organs of both treated and control rats.
Table 2.
Organ/tissue | Organ/tissue | Organ/tissue |
---|---|---|
Adrenal glandsa | Ileum with Peyer's patches | Seminal vesicles and |
All gross lesions | Jejunum | coagulating glandsa |
Aorta | Kidneysa | Skeletal muscle |
Bone marrow smear | Livera | Skin |
Brain (cerebrum, cerebellum and medulla oblongata/pons)a | Lungs | Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic, lumbar |
Cecum | Mammary gland | Spleena |
Colon | Mesenteric lymph nodes | Sternum with marrow |
Duodenum | Esophagus | Stomach |
Epididymidesa | Ovariesa | Testesa |
Esophagus | Pancreas | Thymusa |
Eyes with optic nerve | Pituitarya | Thyroid with Parathyroidsa |
Femur bone with joint | Prostatea | Trachea |
Hearta | Rectum | Urinary bladder |
Salivary glands | Uterus with cervix |
Weighed organs.
Data were captured using Provantis™, a toxicology data capture system. Parameters such as body weight, net bodyweight gains, food consumption, organ weights and their ratios data, clinical pathology data including hematology and clinical chemistry were analyzed using Provantis™ built-in statistical tests. All analyses and comparisons were evaluated at the 5% (P ≤ 0.05) level for significance. The data of both groups were subjected to pair-wise comparisons. Before performing the pair-wise comparison between the two groups, data were evaluated for normality and homogeneity. During the conduct of these analyses, when the data were found to be heterogeneous, suitable transformations were made by the inbuilt Provantis™ software and ANOVA was performed before proceeding with pair-wise tests using Student's t-test.
3. Results
No mortalities or treatment related clinical signs were observed during the treatment period. No treatment-related changes were observed in food consumption for the treated group as compared to the control group (Table 3). A statistically significant decrease in food consumption was seen in treated males during days 1–4 but returned to normal by days 4–7. The change was considered incidental and not treatment related. No treatment-related changes were observed in body weights at the tested dose in either sex during the entire treatment period (Fig. 1).
Table 3.
Group | Males |
Females |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | 0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | |
Days 1–4 | 23.97 ± 0.46 | 22.73 ± 0.83* | 15.29 ± 0.93 | 15.66 ± 0.47 |
Days 4–7 | 23.65 ± 1.10 | 23.59 ± 0.96 | 15.10 ± 0.75 | 16.08 ± 0.89 |
Days 7–11 | 22.90 ± 0.75 | 23.31 ± 1.15 | 16.26 ± 1.04 | 16.40 ± 0.65 |
Days 11–14 | 22.68 ± 0.62 | 22.49 ± 0.48 | 15.88 ± 0.91 | 15.85 ± 0.43 |
All data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations with N = 5.
* Statistically significant from the vehicle control group (P ≤ 0.05).
Data from the hematology, coagulation, and clinical chemistry analyses performed on day 15 are presented in Table 4. Statistically significant changes in hematology included increased absolute monocytes in treated males and increased neutrophils (%) and decreased white blood cells and absolute lymphocytes in treated females. These changes were considered incidental due to the minor magnitude of the changes and/or the changes being within the physiological range (historical control data for the statistically significant parameters are provided in Table 5). For coagulation parameters, an increase in prothrombin time (5%) was seen in treated females and was considered an incidental finding. No other changes in coagulation parameters were seen. Clinical chemistry values including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), total protein, inorganic phosphorous, calcium, albumin, globulin, and A/G ratio were statistically different in treated males and/or females when compared to controls. All of the changes that reached statistical changes were of a low magnitude and within the physiological range of the rat model, and therefore were considered toxicologically insignificant. No statistically significant changes were seen in any of the urine parameters analyzed in terminally sacrificed animals.
Table 4.
Parameter | Males |
Females |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | 0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | |
Hematology | ||||
WBC (109/L) | 8.37 ± 1.27 | 9.22 ± 1.44 | 7.85 ± 1.30 | 6.70 ± 1.14* |
RBC (1012/L) | 8.39 ± 0.20 | 8.52 ± 0.29 | 8.31 ± 0.21 | 8.22 ± 0.21 |
HGB (g/L) | 157 ± 5 | 156 ± 4 | 156 ± 5 | 154 ± 4 |
HCT (L/L) | 0.526 ± 0.011 | 0.529 ± 0.014 | 0.514 ± 0.017 | 0.510 ± 0.015 |
MCV (fL) | 62.7 ± 0.8 | 62.1 ± 0.8 | 61.8 ± 0.9 | 62.1 ± 1.2 |
MCH (pg) | 18.7 ± 0.6 | 18.3 ± 0.5 | 18.8 ± 0.3 | 18.7 ± 0.2 |
MCHC (g/L) | 298 ± 7 | 295 ± 5 | 304 ± 4 | 302 ± 4 |
Plat (109/L) | 1088 ± 73 | 1071 ± 91 | 1036 ± 95 | 1110 ± 124 |
Neut (%) | 10.0 ± 3.2 | 10.8 ± 2.9 | 7.8 ± 1.3 | 9.5 ± 1.9* |
Lymp (%) | 86.0 ± 3.7 | 85.0 ± 3.0 | 87.5 ± 2.8 | 86.2 ± 2.1 |
Mono (%) | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 2.2 | 2.1 ± 1.6 |
Eosi (%) | 0.6 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
Baso (%) | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
Neut A (109/L) | 0.81 ± 0.16 | 1.01 ± 0.34 | 0.62 ± 0.15 | 0.65 ± 0.22 |
Lymp A (109/L) | 7.23 ± 1.34 | 7.83 ± 1.24 | 6.85 ± 0.95 | 5.77 ± 0.97* |
Mono A (109/L) | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.04* | 0.22 ± 0.25 | 0.14 ± 0.08 |
Eosi A (109/L) | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
Baso A (109/L) | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
Coagulation | ||||
PT (s) | 16.9 ± 1.2 | 17.2 ± 0.6 | 17.7 ± 0.5 | 18.5 ± 0.6* |
APTT (s) | 14.2 ± 2.2 | 13.7 ± 2.8 | 12.2 ± 1.5 | 11.6 ± 2.9 |
Clinical chemistry | ||||
Glu (mmol/L) | 7.44 ± 0.73 | 7.16 ± 0.60 | 6.87 ± 0.54 | 7.12 ± 0.32 |
BUN (mmol/L) | 3.94 ± 0.36 | 4.58 ± 0.94* | 5.92 ± 0.81 | 5.11 ± 0.65* |
Creat (μmol/L) | 24 ± 9 | 21 ± 4 | 25 ± 8 | 21 ± 6 |
AST (U/L) | 93 ± 17 | 92 ± 11 | 94 ± 9 | 94 ± 6 |
ALT (U/L) | 61 ± 11 | 55 ± 6 | 49 ± 6 | 50 ± 4 |
GGT (U/L) | 0 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
ALP (U/L) | 177 ± 10 | 180 ± 16 | 117 ± 17 | 120 ± 15 |
T. Bil (μmol/L) | 1.70 ± 0.78a | 1.50 ± 0.54 | 1.25 ± 0.58b | 0.91 ± 0.28b |
T. Chol (mmol/L) | 3.34 ± 0.15 | 3.41 ± 0.27 | 3.49 ± 0.17 | 3.49 ± 0.20 |
Trig (mmol/L) | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 0.71 ± 0.08 | 0.66 ± 0.16 | 0.59 ± 0.06 |
T. Pro (gL) | 64.1 ± 1.8 | 69.4 ± 4.8* | 70.8 ± 1.6 | 66.9 ± 1.2* |
Alb (g/L) | 41.0 ± 1.3 | 40.4 ± 1.2 | 40.2 ± 2.8 | 41.7 ± 0.8* |
Pi (mmol/L) | 2.95 ± 0.11 | 2.78 ± 0.19* | 2.44 ± 0.17 | 2.37 ± 0.10 |
Ca (mmol/L) | 2.47 ± 0.11 | 2.32 ± 0.11* | 2.43 ± 0.21 | 2.48 ± 0.10 |
Na (mEq/L) | 149.4 ± 1.7 | 150.5 ± 0.7 | 148.4 ± 1.5 | 149.3 ± 1.8 |
K (mEq/L) | 3.90 ± 0.21 | 3.86 ± 0.24 | 3.47 ± 0.26 | 3.47 ± 0.21 |
WBC, white blood corpuscles; RBC, red blood corpuscles; HGB, haematoglobin; HCT, haematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; Plat, platelets; Neut, neutrophils; Lymp, lymphocytes; Mono, monocytes; Eosi, eosinophils; Baso, basophils; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; Glu, glucose; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Creat, creatine; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; T. Bil, total bilirubin; T. Chol, total cholesterol; Trig, triglycerides; T. Pro, total plasma protein; Alb, albumin; Pi, inorganic phosphorous; Ca, calcium; Na, sodium; K, potassium.
Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations with N = 10.
* Statistically significant from the vehicle control group (P ≤ 0.05).
N = 8 (two values below the lower limit of Quantification for T. Bil (0.40 μmol/L) were not considered for analysis).
N = 9 (one value below the lower limit of Quantification for T. Bil (0.40 μmol/L) was not considered for analysis).
Table 5.
Parameter | Historical control values (mean values) | Historical control (ranges) |
---|---|---|
Hematology and coagulation | ||
Monocyte absolute – males (G/L) | 0.63 | 0.04–6.60 |
White blood cells (WBC) – females (G/L) | 8.44 | 3.76–13.87 |
Neutrophil % – females (%) | 8.36 | 0.67–17.60 |
Lymphocyte absolute – females (G/L) | 13.18 | 2.91–83.20 |
Prothrombin time – females (s) | 16.50 | 13.20–19.20 |
Clinical chemistry | ||
Blood urea nitrogen – males (mmol/L) | 4.81 | 1.97–8.04 |
Total protein – males (g/L) | 61.93 | 47.50–72.90 |
Inorganic phosphorous – males (mmol/L) | 2.86 | 2.25–3.70 |
Calcium – males (mmol/L) | 16.07 | 2.32–154.30 |
Blood urea nitrogen – females (mmol/L) | 5.62 | 3.11–9.18 |
Total protein – females (g/L) | 64.51 | 48.00–79.00 |
Albumin – females (g/L) | 39.56 | 9.60–60.70 |
Organ weights | ||
Kidneys – absolute wt – females (g) | 1.33 | 0.74–1.97 |
When compared to the control groups, no significant changes attributed to treatment were seen in organ weights or organ to body weight ratios for treated males or females (Table 6, Table 7). A marginal but statistically significant increase in absolute kidney weights was seen in treated females (7%). This increase was not statistically significant in relative kidney weights. In addition, no correlating changes in clinical observations or histopathological changes were seen. Therefore, the kidney weight change was considered to be incidental.
Table 6.
Group | Males |
Females |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | 0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | |
Terminal fasting BW (g) | 242.47 ± 7.85 | 241.55 ± 8.90 | 175.73 ± 11.93 | 179.52 ± 8.19 |
Adrenals (g) | 0.0494 ± 0.0057 | 0.0504 ± 0.0050 | 0.0635 ± 0.0039 | 0.0635 ± 0.0063 |
Brain (g) | 1.7788 ± 0.0721 | 1.7615 ± 0.0479 | 1.6966 ± 0.0495 | 1.6655 ± 0.0635 |
Epididymides (g) | 0.7626 ± 0.0656 | 0.7815 ± 0.0693 | – | – |
Heart (g) | 0.9614 ± 0.0661 | 0.9400 ± 0.0542 | 0.7365 ± 0.0728 | 0.7516 ± 0.0689 |
Kidneys (g) | 1.7076 ± 0.1248 | 1.7031 ± 0.1289 | 1.1664 ± 0.0970 | 1.2517 ± 0.0825* |
Liver (g) | 7.8023 ± 0.6408 | 7.9786 ± 0.3449 | 5.7662 ± 0.6303 | 5.8339 ± 0.4218 |
Ovaries | – | – | 0.0829 ± 0.0151 | 0.0903 ± 0.0123 |
Pituitary (g) | 0.0106 ± 0.0011 | 0.0102 ± 0.0009 | 0.0119 ± 0.0016 | 0.0123 ± 0.0009 |
Prostate (g) | 0.6334 ± 0.1241 | 0.6051 ± 0.0892 | – | – |
Seminal vesicles & coagulating glands (g) | 0.9122 ± 0.1593 | 0.9074 ± 0.1118 | – | – |
Spleen (g) | 0.6686 ± 0.0491 | 0.6749 ± 0.0606 | 0.5584 ± 0.0940 | 0.5802 ± 0.0760 |
Testes (g) | 3.2168 ± 0.1936 | 3.2735 ± 0.2095 | – | – |
Thymus (g) | 0.5265 ± 0.0494 | 0.5356 ± 0.0921 | 0.4463 ± 0.1134 | 0.4184 ± 0.1130 |
Thyroid with parathyroids (g) | 0.0287 ± 0.0060 | 0.0299 ± 0.0049 | 0.0268 ± 0.0060 | 0.0249 ± 0.0029 |
Uterus with cervix (g) | – | – | 0.4234 ± 0.0523 | 0.5206 ± 0.2208 |
All data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations with N = 10.
* Statistically significant from the vehicle control group (P ≤ 0.05).
Table 7.
Group | Males |
Females |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | 0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | |
Adrenals (%) | 0.0204 ± 0.0027 | 0.0209 ± 0.0025 | 0.0363 ± 0.0033 | 0.0354 ± 0.0037 |
Brain (%) | 0.7337 ± 0.0219 | 0.7300 ± 0.0289 | 0.9704 ± 0.0846 | 0.9301 ± 0.0660 |
Epididymides (%) | 0.3151 ± 0.0320 | 0.3235 ± 0.0242 | – | – |
Heart (%) | 0.3968 ± 0.0287 | 0.3892 ± 0.0177 | 0.4186 ± 0.0208 | 0.4181 ± 0.0249 |
Kidneys (%) | 0.7040 ± 0.0405 | 0.7053 ± 0.0495 | 0.6646 ± 0.0469 | 0.6985 ± 0.0520 |
Liver (%) | 3.2141 ± 0.1737 | 3.3056 ± 0.1533 | 3.2772 ± 0.2061 | 3.2481 ± 0.1504 |
Ovaries (%) | – | – | 0.0473 ± 0.0091 | 0.0504 ± 0.0075 |
Pituitary (%) | 0.0044 ± 0.0005 | 0.0042 ± 0.0004 | 0.0068 ± 0.0009 | 0.0069 ± 0.0006 |
Prostate (%) | 0.2612 ± 0.0498 | 0.2500 ± 0.0315 | – | – |
Seminal vesicles & coagulating glands (%) | 0.3770 ± 0.0698 | 0.3761 ± 0.0481 | – | – |
Spleen (%) | 0.2757 ± 0.0180 | 0.2794 ± 0.0236 | 0.3161 ± 0.0350 | 0.3227 ± 0.0340 |
Testes (%) | 1.3264 ± 0.0606 | 1.3562 ± 0.0903 | – | – |
Thymus (%) | 0.2169 ± 0.0163 | 0.2216 ± 0.0370 | 0.2521 ± 0.0500 | 0.2311 ±0.0524 |
Thyroid with parathyroids (%) | 0.0118 ± 0.0025 | 0.0124 ± 0.0019 | 0.0152 ± 0.0031 | 0.0139 ± 0.0017 |
Uterus with cervix (%) | – | – | 0.2419 ±0.0323 | 0.2909 ± 0.1259 |
All data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations with N = 10.
* Statistically significant from the vehicle control group (P ≤ 0.05).
Compared to their respective control groups, no test item-related gross pathological lesions were evident in male or female rats at terminal necropsy (day 15). No incidental findings were seen in females. In treated males a single incidence of unilateral testis focal reddish discoloration was seen. No correlating changes were seen microscopically. The discoloration was determined to be incidental. No other incidental findings were seen in males. Microscopic findings (accessory cortical tissue in adrenal glands, esophageal inflammatory foci, cardiac inflammatory focus, renal basophilic or cystic tubules, hepatocellular inflammatory focus, pulmonary inflammatory focus, pancreatic acinar cell apoptosis, prostate lymphocytic infiltration, spinal cord keratin cyst, stomach dilated gland glandular mucosa, thymus hemorrhage, inflammation or epithelial cyst with eosinophilic crystals, thyroid gland ectopic thymus, and uterine dilation) occurred at low frequencies in the control and treated animals and were not considered treatment related (Table 8).
Table 8.
Group | Males |
Females |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | 0 mL/kg | 10 mL/kg | |
Number of animals per group | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Adrenal glands | ||||
Accessory cortical tissue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Esophagus | ||||
Inflammatory focus; muscularis (minimal) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Heart | ||||
Inflammatory focus (minimal) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Kidneys | ||||
Basophilic tubules (minimal) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Cystic tubule – solitary | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Liver | ||||
Inflammatory focus (minimal) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Lungs | ||||
Inflammatory focus (minimal) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Pancreas | ||||
Increased acinar cell apoptosis (minimal) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Pituitary gland | ||||
Cyst; pars distalis | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Prostate | ||||
Lymphocytic infiltration (minimal) | 2 | 1 | – | – |
Rectum | ||||
Nematode | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Spinal cord | ||||
Keratin cyst | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Stomach | ||||
Dilated gland – solitory; glandular mucosa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Thymus | ||||
Hemorrhage (minimal) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Inflammation (mild) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Epithelial cysts with eosinophilic crystals | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Thyroid gland | ||||
Ectopic thymus | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Uterus with cervix | ||||
Dilation (mild) | – | – | 0 | 2 |
All data are presented as number of animals affected.
Under the conditions of this study, oral gavage administration of viable N. oculata suspension at the dose volume of 10 mL/kg (providing at least 1 × 10E8 viable cells) to male and female rats for 14 days did not cause any treatment-related effects.
4. Discussion
Prior to this study, the toxicity of Nannochloropsis species algae has been assessed in rats following acute and subchronic (up to 60 days) administration [8], [9], [10] as well as in pregnant rats during mating and through pregnancy and lactation [11]. Acute toxicity tests in rats administered biomass of N. oculata by oral gavage revealed no effects (LD50 ≥ 12 g/kg) [8], [9]. Similarly, no treatment-related effects were seen in rats treated with 3000 or 6000 mg/kg/day N. oculata biomass by oral gavage daily for 60 days (NOAEL ≥ 6000 mg/kg/day) [8]. However, this previously conducted study only focused on the potential nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity of a nonviable N. oculata biomass, not to the potential pathogenicity of the viable organism. No treatment-related effects were seen in rats fed 10,000 mg/kg/day whole freeze-dried Nannochloropsis (species not stated), algal lipid extract (3500 mg/kg/day) or algal residue (6500 mg/kg/day) daily for 30 days [10]. However, Nuno et al., [9] reported weight loss in hyperglycemic male rats treated with a freeze-dried culture of N. oculata by oral gavage (250 mg/kg/day) daily for 8 weeks. Examination of intestinal tissue sections revealed the presence of intestinal atrophy and gastrointestinal damage. The authors noted that the adverse effects may have been due to the algae's cellular structure, as the cell wall of N. oculata is rigid and relatively thick, and when freeze-dried could adversely impact the epithelium, lactic acid bacteria counts, and nutrient absorption [9]. No reproductive or developmental effects were seen following the treatment of pregnant and lactating rats with 2000 mg/kg/day Nannochloropsis algae in the diet [11].
Here we describe the nonclinical toxicity of viable N. oculata in rats following daily administration in rats by oral gavage for 14 days. No treatment-related effects were seen in male or female rats following daily oral treatment with 10 mL/kg, providing at least 1 × 10E8 viable algal cells to each animal. A transient decrease in food consumption occurred at days 1–4 in the male rats, but returned to the control range for the remainder of the study. Non-viable N. oculata biomass has been provided to Sprague-Dawley rats for 60 days with significant increases in body weight gains, compared to control rats [8]. However, it was not stated that the diets in this study were isocaloric. Statistically significant changes seen in the hematological parameters were not indicative of a response to infection, as the changes were both increased (i.e., absolute monocytes in the males and increased neutrophils in the females) and decreased (i.e., white blood cells and absolute lymphocytes), and were minor in magnitude. In the same manner, the clinical chemistry value changes that reached significance were not consistent between the male and female groups, were within the physiological range of the Sprague-Dawley rat for the laboratory, and did not correlate with any histological changes in the organs. This is the first known study which evaluated the potential toxicity or pathogenicity of the microalgae N. oculata. Other microalgae are known to produce algal toxins that can cause animal and human toxicity. Administration of the viable N. oculata cells shows that this species of microalgae does not produce toxins that hinder the growth of this rat model when consumed over a 14-day period.
Because it is a rich source of eicosapentaeneoic acid (EPA), the microalgae N. oculata is being utilized in the production of Almega PL™ (Qualitas Health, Ltd.), an EPA-rich omega-3 oil isolated for use as a dietary supplement ingredient. In addition to the 14-day study on N oculata presented here, a battery of nonclinical studies indicating the safety of the algal oil at levels up to 2000 mg/kg/day has recently been published [12]. As shown in several published preclinical studies, consumption of N. oculata biomass for up to 60 days did not cause any adverse effects. However, one study did indicate that gavage administration of freeze-dried N. oculata biomass caused gastrointestinal damage most likely due to the rigid cell wall of N. oculata. Because EPA supplements derived from N oculata would consist of oil extracted from the algae, and not the algae itself, the rigid cell wall would not be a safety issue.
In conclusion, treatment with viable N. oculata suspension at a dose volume of 10 mL/kg (providing at least 1 × 10E8 viable algal cells/animal) to male and female rats for 14 days did not cause any treatment-related effects. Based on the available data, N. oculata used in the development of an EPA-delivering dietary supplement is not toxigenic or pathogenic when administered orally to rats.
Conflict of interest
Michael L. Kagan is an employee of Qualitas Health Ltd. Ray A. Matulka declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Transparency document
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the Gad Consulting Services, Cary, North Carolina, USA, for help in drafting this manuscript. This work was supported by Qualitas Health Ltd.
References
- 1.Guiry M.D., Guiry G.M. National University of Ireland; Galway: 2014. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication.http://www.algaebase.org (searched on 27.05.14) [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sukenik A., Carmeli Y., Berner T. Regulation of fatty acid composition by irradiance level in the eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis sp. J. Phycol. 1989;25:686–692. [Google Scholar]
- 3.FDA . 2015. US Food and Drug Administration New Dietary Ingredient Notification Report #826.http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2014-S-0023-0041 (searched on 25.02.15) [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kent M., Welladsen H.M., Mangott A., Li Y. Nutritional evaluation of Australian microalgae as potential human health supplements. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0118985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.OECD . 1997. OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (as Revised in 1997): Council Decision [C(97) 186/Final] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aubel M. 2013. Microcystin/Nodularin, Anatoxin-a, Cylindrospermopsin, Paralytic Shellfish Toxins (Saxitoxins), Okadaic Acid, Brevetoxins & Domoic Acid Data Report, Palatka, Florida; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 7.USEPA . 1996. Microbial Pesticide Test Guidelines, OPPTS 885.3050, Acute Oral Toxicity/Pathogenicity. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kafaie S., Loh S.P., Mohtarrudin N. Acute and sub-chronic toxicological assessment of Nannochloropsis oculata in rats. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012;7(7):1220–1225. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nuno K. Effects of the marine microalgae Isochrysis galbana and Nannochloropsis oculata in diabetic rats. J. Funct. Foods. 2013;5:106–115. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Werman M.J., Sukenik A., Mokady S. Effects of the marine unicellular alga Nannochloropsis sp. to reduce the plasma and liver cholesterol levels in male rats fed on diets with cholesterol. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003;67(10):2266–2268. doi: 10.1271/bbb.67.2266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mokady S., Sukenik A. A marine unicellular alga in diets of pregnant and lactating rats as a source of omega-3 fatty acids for the developing brain of their progeny. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1995;68:133–139. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kagan M.L., Sullivan D.W., Jr., Gad S.C., Ballou C.M. Safety assessment of EPA-rich polar lipid oil produced from the microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata. Int. J. Toxicol. 2014;33(November–December (6)):459–474. doi: 10.1177/1091581814553453. 10.1177/1091581814553453. Epub 9 October 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.