ABSTRACT
The optimal radiation dose and fractionation to induce anti-tumor immunity remain elusive. We recently found that the exonuclease TREX1 abrogates the immunogenicity of irradiated cancer cells by degrading interferon-stimulatory cytosolic dsDNA. TREX1 upregulation by radiation dose per fraction beyond a threshold of 10–12 Gy results in poor synergy with immune checkpoint blockers.
KEYWORDS: abscopal effect, cGAS, immune checkpoint blockers, nucleic acids sensing, radiotherapy, STING, type I interferon
Radiation therapy (RT) has been recognized to convey immunogenicity to an irradiated neoplastic lesion by inducing pro-inflammatory signals amenable to the immune system recognition.1 The ability of RT to jumpstart systemic immune responses provides a putative explanation for the rare, but well established clinical observation that occasional patients with metastatic disease experienced responses of metastasis outside the irradiated field (abscopal effect). How radiation should be administered in terms of dose and fractionation to facilitate such abscopal responses, particularly when combined with modern immunotherapy, is currently being debated.
In our recent publication in Nature Communications, we performed side-by-side comparisons of different radiation doses and fractionation in mice bearing bilateral TSA murine breast carcinoma to evaluate the mechanisms by which tumor-targeted RT synergizes with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-12 immune checkpoint blockade. In line with our previous report,3 we found that in terms of in field control of the irradiated tumor a single high dose of 30 Gy was comparable to radiation administered in 3 fractions of 8 Gy given in consecutive days (8 Gy X 3); however, only the fractionated regimen (8Gy X 3) but not a single 30 Gy dose induced abscopal responses when combined with anti-CTLA-4. Gene expression analysis of the irradiated tumors revealed that 8Gy X 3 induced the interferon type I (IFN-I) genes signature while single high dose RT failed to do so. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this difference we then performed a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments, which revealed that RT activated the production of IFNb and expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) in the cancer cells, which was mediated by cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS aka Mab-21 domain containing 1 – MB21D1) and its adaptor protein named stimulator of interferon genes (STING aka transmembrane protein 173 – TMEM173). Findings were confirmed in murine TSA, 4T1 and MCA-38 and human MDA-MB-231 carcinoma cells. Conditional silencing of cGAS or STING in the cancer cells at the irradiated tumor site demonstrated that cancer-cell cGAS/STING pathway activation was essential for the RT-driven initiation of systemic anti-tumor immunity via the recruitment of BATF3-dependent dendritic cells (DCs) to the tumor, a DC subset well-known to be critical for cross-priming of anticancer CD8+ T cells.4, 5
Because cGAS is a nucleiotidyltransferase that selectively binds cytosolic double stranded (ds) DNA6 to initiate IFN-I responses upon STING stimulation, we investigated dsDNA content in the cytosol of cells subjected to radiation doses ranging from 0 Gy to 30 Gy. Strikingly, as the radiation dose increased, more cytosolic dsDNA accumulated to a critical thereshold when it abruptly decreased, generally with doses that varied between 12 to 18 Gy in different carcinoma murine and human cells.
In a series of distinct experiments we then demonstrated that the main reason as of to why doses above this threshold did not confer immunogenicity was the dose-dependent upregulation of the 3 prime repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1). TREX1 is a DNA nuclease whose main role is to degrade cytoplasmic ds- and single stranded (ss) DNA.7 We found in TSA cells that at RT single doses above 12 Gy cytosolic dsDNA was cleared by TREX1, precluding the activation of cGAS pathway to induce IFN-1, therefore abolishing RT-induced abscopal effect. During immune checkpoint blockade with either anti-PD1 or anti CTLA-4 enforced TREX1 expression in TSA cells completely abrogated the immunogenicity of a regimen of 8 Gy X 3 whereas knockdown of TREX1 restored the immunogenicity of a single dose of 20 Gy, hence confirming the critical role of TREX1 as a regulator of RT immunogenicity. Interestingly, to achieve robust abscopal effects repeated doses were important, as demonstrated in vitro by the marked upregulation of IFNb production by carcinoma cells treated with 8 Gy X 3 versus 8 Gy single dose, and in vivo by the requirement for repeating the dose 2 to 3 times, even when 20 Gy was used in a setting of TSA cells with TREX1 knockdown.
While the mechanisms leading to TREX1 upregulation upon RT treatment are currently under investigation, our results clearly identify TREX1 as an upstream regulator of radiation-induced anti-tumor immunity, and provide a candidate biomarker to guide the selection of the radiation dose and fractionation in the clinic (Fig. 1). Importantly, in the mouse and human carcinoma cells tested, the radiation dose threshold for TREX1 upregulation sufficient to clear cytoplasmic dsDNA was consistently above 10 Gy, while exhibiting some variation, with some cells lines preserving their immunogenicity up to doses of 15 Gy in a single fraction.2 The relationship between intrinsic radiosensitivity of the cancer cells and TREX1 induction remains to be determined. Likewise, it is unknown if in vivo, the presence of tumor hypoxia may shift the threshold for TREX1 induction.
Figure 1.

Radiation doses accumulate cytosolic dsDNA amenable to cGAS sensing and the subsequent STING stimulation to induce type-I interferon, hence jumpstarting anti-tumor immunity and turning on immune rejection and abscopal responses. Above a radiation dose threshold of 12–18Gy, the DNA exonuclease TREX1 is upregulated therefore turning off RT-driven immune responses by degrading dsDNA and the subsequent cGAS/STING activation.
Interestingly, DNA derived from cancer cells has been shown to stimulate IFNb production via the cGAS/STING pathway not only in cancer cells but also in DC infiltrating the tumor, by gaining access to their cytoplasm via undefined mechanisms.8 It is also possible that TREX1 upregulation may also reduce the amount of DNA taken up by DCs, further decreasing the activation of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells.
Despite the many open questions remaining, including the mechanisms that control dsDNA accumulation in the cytoplasm of irradiated cells, the new mechanisms identified advance the current understanding of dose-dependency of radiation immunogenicity, and provides information critical to the design of clinical trials testing the combination of radiation with immunotherapy.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
This study was supported by NIH R01 CA201246 to SD, and S10 RR027619 to SCF. Additional funding was provided by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (to SCF and SD; BCRF-16–054) and the Chemotherapy Foundation (to SD). CVB is supported, in part, by a Post-doctoral fellowship from the DOD BCRP (W81XWH-13–1–0012) and by the 2017 Kellen Junior Faculty Fellowship from the Anna-Maria and Stephen Kellen Foundation.
References
- 1.Demaria S, Golden EB, Formenti SC. Role of local radiation therapy in cancer immunotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1:1325-32; PMID:26270858; https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vanpouille-Box C, Alard A, Aryankalayil MJ, Sarfraz Y, Diamond JM, Schneider RJ, Inghirami G, Coleman CN, Formenti SC, Demaria S. DNA exonuclease Trex1 regulates radiotherapy-induced tumor immunogenicity. Nat Commun 2017; 8:15618 in press; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms15618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dewan MZ, Galloway AE, Kawashima N, Dewyngaert JK, Babb JS, Formenti SC, Demaria S. Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an immune-mediated abscopal effect when combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:5379-88; PMID:19706802; https://doi.org/ 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fuertes MB, Kacha AK, Kline J, Woo SR, Kranz DM, Murphy KM, Gajewski TF. Host type I IFN signals are required for antitumor CD8+ T cell responses through CD8a+ dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2011; 208:2005-16; PMID:21930765; https://doi.org/ 10.1084/jem.20101159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Diamond MS, Kinder M, Matsushita H, Mashayekhi M, Dunn GP, Archambault JM, Lee H, Arthur CD, White JM, Kalinke U, et al.. Type I interferon is selectively required by dendritic cells for immune rejection of tumors. J Exp Med 2011; 208:1989-2003; PMID:21930769; https://doi.org/ 10.1084/jem.20101158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gao P, Ascano M, Wu Y, Barchet W, Gaffney BL, Zillinger T, Serganov AA, Liu Y, Jones RA, Hartmann G, et al.. Cyclic [G(2′,5′)pA(3′,5′)p] is the metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase. Cell 2013; 153:1094-107; PMID:23647843; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stetson DB, Ko JS, Heidmann T, Medzhitov R. Trex1 prevents cell-intrinsic initiation of autoimmunity. Cell 2008; 134:587-98; PMID:18724932; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woo SR, Fuertes MB, Corrales L, Spranger S, Furdyna MJ, Leung MY, Duggan R, Wang Y, Barber GN, Fitzgerald KA, et al.. STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing mediates innate immune recognition of immunogenic tumors. Immunity 2014; 41:830-42; PMID:25517615; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
