Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 14;7:11628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12024-z

Vimentin knockout results in increased expression of sub-endothelial basement membrane components and carotid stiffness in mice

Benoit Langlois 1,#, Ekaterina Belozertseva 1,#, Ara Parlakian 2, Mustapha Bourhim 1, Jacqueline Gao-Li 2, Jocelyne Blanc 2, Lei Tian 2, Dario Coletti 2, Carlos Labat 1, Zhor Ramdame-Cherif 1, Pascal Challande 3, Véronique Regnault 1, Patrick Lacolley 1, Zhenlin Li 2,
PMCID: PMC5599644  PMID: 28912461

Abstract

Intermediate filaments are involved in stress-related cell mechanical properties and in plasticity via the regulation of focal adhesions (FAs) and the actomyosin network. We investigated whether vimentin regulates endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and thereby influences vasomotor tone and arterial stiffness. Vimentin knockout mice (Vim−/−) exhibited increased expression of laminin, fibronectin, perlecan, collagen IV and VE-cadherin as well as von Willebrand factor deposition in the subendothelial basement membrane. Smooth muscle (SM) myosin heavy chain, α-SM actin and smoothelin were decreased in Vim−/− mice. Electron microscopy revealed a denser endothelial basement membrane and increased SM cell-matrix interactions. Integrin αv, talin and vinculin present in FAs were increased in Vim−/− mice. Phosphorylated FA kinase and its targets Src and ERK1/2 were elevated in Vim−/− mice. Knockout of vimentin, but not of synemin, resulted in increased carotid stiffness and contractility and endothelial dysfunction, independently of blood pressure and the collagen/elastin ratio. The increase in arterial stiffness in Vim−/− mice likely involves vasomotor tone and endothelial basement membrane organization changes. At the tissue level, the results show the implication of FAs both in ECs and vascular SMCs in the role of vimentin in arterial stiffening.

Introduction

Intermediate filaments (IF), actin-containing microfilaments and microtubules are the three main cytoskeletal systems involved in the transfer of mechanical forces from the cell membrane to the nucleus. The IF family contains more than 70 genes that provide a versatile, tunable, self-assembled network that is interconnected strongly with the other filament types14. IF proteins are anchored at focal adhesions (FAs) to mediate integrin mechano-transduction in response to extracellular matrix stiffness57.

Vimentin (Vim), a 57 kDa type III IF protein which is found in precursor neural and mesenchymal cells during mouse embryo development, is replaced progressively by tissue-specific IF members, such as the muscle-specific IF protein, desmin (Des), in muscle cells. In adult mice, Vim is expressed mainly in mesenchyme-derived cells including fibroblasts, endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs). There exists a gradient in the Vim/Des ratio in the vascular tree of humans and mice8,9. Higher Vim content is found in larger arteries such as the aorta and the carotid artery while Des-positive cells are predominant in small-sized muscular arteries such as the mesenteric artery. A third member of IF family, synemin (Synm) co-assembles with different IF partners, in particular Des and Vim, and participates in the dynamics of FAs via its interactions with talin, vinculin and zyxin1015. Vim is a component of FAs1619 where it binds directly or indirectly to integrins via structures termed vimentin associated matrix adhesions (VAMs)18,20,21.

The main extracellular matrix components, vasomotor tone and vascular SMC-matrix interactions are thought to be major determinants of arterial stiffness2224. It has been reported also that intrinsic stiffness of vascular SMCs is increased in association with increased aortic stiffness2426. Recently, increased stiffness and adhesion properties of vascular SMCs in hypertension have been shown to accelerate age-related aortic stiffness27. Activation of the serum response factor (SRF)/myocardin transcription pathway is responsible for increased SMC stiffness and thereby plays a central role in hypertension-mediated aortic stiffening28,29. Using an inducible SMC-specific knockout mouse model of the SRF gene, we have demonstrated that SRF-related decreases in vasomotor tone and cell-matrix attachment in SMCs decreased arterial stiffness in large arteries30. Endothelial mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in stiffening of ECs due to aberrant endothelial signaling and subsequent reduction in production and bioavailability of vasoactive factors27. The endothelium exerts a regulatory effect on vascular SMC tone via NO release and shear stress31. The age-related increase in arterial stiffness is also due to the loss of endothelial regulation of vascular SMC proliferation and to the production of reactive oxygen species32.

In Des knockout mice, vascular SMCs have lost a part of their connections to the extracellular matrix, and carotid arteries from Des−/− mice had higher vascular stiffness and arterial wall viscosity compared with Des+/+ mice, without changes in arterial thickness or in elastin and collagen contents33. In contrast to Des, expressed only in SMCs, Vim and Synm are expressed in both SMCs and ECs of the artery. Contrasting reports show that Vim decreases FA size on the one hand5,34 and increases cell stiffness on the other35,36 which raises the hypothesis that Vim and/or Synm exert a complex regulating action on SMC and EC functions and are therefore involved in arterial stiffening. In the present study we exploited Vim knockout (Vim−/−) and/or Synm knockout (Synm−/−) mice to clarify the role of these IF proteins in the mechanical properties of the arterial wall. We further assessed expression of specific markers of ECs and SMCs, and the organization of basement membranes and focal adhesion complexes. We demonstrate a key role for Vim, endothelial basement membrane structure and function, and FAs in arterial stiffness. We have thus identified a targeted approach to treat arterial stiffening.

Results

Expression of vimentin in vascular cells

To examine the expression of Vim in arteries, we stained the carotid artery of adult mice with antibodies against α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) in SMCs and to CD31 in ECs. Both α-SMA-positive and CD31-positive cells stained for Vim indicating that Vim was present in SMCs and ECs (Fig. 1A,B). Western blot and immunostaining in Vim−/− mice confirmed total knockout in all Vim-expressing cells (Fig. 1C,D). To investigate whether loss of Vim affected Synm expression, carotid arteries of Vim−/−, Synm−/− and Des−/− mice were stained for Vim and Synm. Vim and Synm filaments were present in the carotids of control (CT) mice and Des−/− mice. Whereas positive staining for Vim filaments was observed in Synm−/− mice, Vim−/− arteries showed an absence of Synm (Fig. 1E). Previous studies have shown that the presence of Synm in IF is dependent on the presence of Vim but not of Des in the vessels of the mouse embryo10. We confirmed this observation in adult mice.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression of Vim and its partners in carotid artery and aorta in mice. Confocal immunofluorescence images of the carotid artery shows the presence of Vim (red) in SM-α-actin-positive (green) SMCs (A) and CD31-positive (green)ECs (B) in CT mice. (C) Western blot analysis indicates the knockout of Vim in the carotid artery of Vim−/− mice. (D) Immunofluorescence staining shows the knockout of Vim in the carotid artery and aorta of Vim−/− mice. (E) Confocal immunofluorescence images show co-localization of Vim (red) and Synm (green) in wild-type (WT) mice and Des−/− mice. Synemin intermediate filaments are absent in Vim−/− mice while Vim filaments are present in Synm−/− mice. Scale bar = 50 μm in panels A, B and D and 25 μm in panel E.

Increased expression of components of the basement membrane in Vim−/− mice

To investigate whether Vim knockout affects the micromechanical environment of ECs, we examined the vascular wall and the specific components of the basement membrane in CT and Vim−/− carotid walls using histomorphometry. In Vim−/− mice, there were no changes in carotid elastin and collagen densities compared with CT mice (Fig. 2A,B). The loss of Vim increased mRNA levels of Lama2, Lama4 and Lamb1 genes, whose products are basement membrane components, (Fig. 2C). There were no changes in the expression of the matrix genes Col1a1, Col3a1, Col8a1, Eln and Fn1. The total levels of fibronectin and laminin were increased in Vim−/− mice (Fig. 2D). Immunofluorescence staining analysis showed that these increases occurred predominantly in the subendothelial basement membrane (Fig. 2E). We saw also a marked increase in perlecan and collagen IV in the subendothelium (Fig. 3A). In Des−/− mice, only collagen IV is increased in the subendothelium (Supplementary Fig. S1). The thickness of basement membrane in Vim−/− was twice that in CT mice. To further evaluate the deposition of EC-derived proteins, we stained for specific endothelial markers VE-cadherin and von Willebrand Factor (VWF). Both markers were increased in Vim−/− mice (Fig. 3B). VWF staining differed in that deposition extended underneath perlecan, a feature not observed in CT mice.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of Vim knockout on matrix proteins in carotid artery. (A) Histomorphometry from Vim−/− and CT mice. Cross-sections of carotid artery were stained with Weigert’s resorcin-fuchsin for elastin and Sirius red for collagen. (B) Elastin and collagen density in the media. (C) Relative mRNA levels (Vim−/− vs CT) of genes encoding several ECM proteins of the carotid artery by qRT-PCR. (D) Western blot analysis of fibronectin and laminin in the carotid artery of Vim−/− mice. Results are expressed as means ± SEM (n ≥ 3 in each group). *P < 0.05 compared with CT mice by unpaired Student’s t-test. (E) Confocal immunofluorescence images show the increase in fibronectin and laminin in the subendothelial basement membrane (arrows). The thickness of basement membrane after staining by anti-fibronectin and anti-laminin antibodies is measured and expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3 in each group). *P < 0.05 compared with CT mice by unpaired Student’s t-test. Scale bars = 50 µm in panel A and 25 µm in panel E.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of Vim knockout on the structure of the carotid artery. (A) Confocal immunofluorescence images show the increased expression of basement membrane components, collagen IV and perlecan (arrows), in Vim−/− mice. The thickness of the basement membrane after staining by anti-collagen IV and anti-perlecan antibodies is measured and expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3 in each group). *P < 0.05 compared with CT mice by unpaired Student’s t-test. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence images show the increased expression (arrows) of the specific endothelial cell markers, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and VE-cadherin, in Vim−/− mice. The arrows indicate deposits of VWF underneath perlecan. (C) Electron microscopic analysis from Vim−/− and CT mice. The basement membrane of ECs contains more dense materials (orange arrows) in Vim−/− mice. Yellow arrows indicate less finger-like projections in SMCs from Vim−/− mice. The average basement membrane intensity was measured and is expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3 in each group). *P < 0.05 compared with CT mice by unpaired Student’s t-test. Scale bars = 25 µm in panels A and B and 1 µm in panel C.

Electron microscopy examination indicated that the basement membrane area between the internal elastic lamina and ECs contained more dense material in Vim−/− mice (Fig. 3C). Using morphometric analysis, we found an increase in 50% of the average basement membrane intensity in Vim−/− mice compared to CT mice. In the latter, the SMCs displayed fingerlike projections to anchor them to the elastic lamellae. In Vim−/− mice, there were less SMC fingerlike projections and they presented a dense smooth membrane profile. Taken together these data demonstrate a markedly altered expression of the components of the basement membrane surrounding ECs and SMCs in Vim−/− mice in the absence of any modification of the major extracellular proteins that are known to contribute to arterial stiffening.

Decreased expression of SMC differentiation markers in Vim−/− mice

We tested whether basement membrane changes were associated with changes in markers of the various stages of vascular SMC differentiation (early, midstage and fully differentiated). Expression of SMC-specific genes coding for α-SMA (Acta2), SM-myosin heavy chain (Myh11) and smoothelin (Smtn) was unchanged in Vim−/− mice compared with CT mice (Fig. 4A). Expression of other SMC-specific markers such as caldesmon and calponin as well as the SMC acto-myosin regulatory proteins Myl9, MYPT1, CPI-17, cofilin and RhoA was unchanged in Vim−/− mice compared with CT mice at both the mRNA and protein levels (Supplementary Fig. S2). However, a marked decrease in α-SMA, SM-myosin heavy chain and smoothelin protein levels was observed by immunofluorescence staining and/or Western blot analysis (Fig. 4B,C). This decreased expression demonstrates that the loss of Vim may have influenced the stability of the protein markers of the SM contractile phenotype, indicating a less differentiated state of vascular SMCs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Alteration of specific markers of smooth muscle cells in the carotid artery. (A) Relative mRNA levels (Vim−/− vs CT) of genes encoding α-SMA, SM-MHC and smoothelin in the carotid artery by qRT-PCR. (B) Immunofluorescence staining shows a decrease in α-SMA, SM-MHC and smoothelin in Vim−/− mice. (C) Western blot analysis shows a decrease in α-SMA, SM-MHC and smoothelin of SMCs from Vim−/− mice. Results are expressed as means ± SEM (n ≥ 3 in each group). *P < 0.05 compared with CT mice by the unpaired Student’s t-test. Scale bars = 50 µm in panel B.

Increased expression of focal adhesion proteins in Vim−/− mice

To explore whether modifications in differentiation markers of both ECs and SMCs impact FA activation, we profiled the expression of genes involved in focal adhesions. Expression of genes encoding the integrin subunits αv and β8 (Itgav, Itgb8), components of FAs including focal adhesion kinase (Ptk2), ZO-1 (Tip1), claudin (Cldn1), JAM-1 (F11r), VE-cadherin (Cdh5), VEGFR2 (Kdr), EDNRB (Ednrb) and Tie2 (Tek) receptors, the cytokines ANG1 (angpt1) and ANG2 (Angpt2), as well as the mineralocorticoid receptor (Nr3c2) was increased in Vim−/− mice compared with CT mice (Fig. 5A). Increases in the αv integrin subunit, talin and vinculin were observed at the protein level (Fig. 5B). Immunofluorescence analysis showed also an increase in vinculin and confirmed the increase in the αv integrin subunit (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Focal adhesion proteins in the carotid artery. (A) Relative mRNA levels (Vim−/− vs CT) of genes encoding components of focal adhesions by qRT-PCR. (B) Western blot analysis shows the increased expression of αv integrin subunit, talin and vinculin in Vim−/− mice. Results are expressed as means ± SEM (n ≥ 3 in each group). (C) Immunofluorescence staining shows increased αv integrin and vinculin in SMCs from Vim−/− mice. (D) Western blot analysis shows an increase in phosphorylated FAK, Src and ERK1/2 in Vim−/− mice. Results are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 7 in each group). *P < 0.05 compared with CT mice by the unpaired Student’s t-test. Scale bars = 25 µm in panel C.

To analyze whether loss of vimentin also modified the proteins involved in linking integrin adhesion molecules to the actin cytoskeleton, we quantified phosphorylation of FAK, Src, and ERK1/2. We found a higher level of phosphorylation of FAK, Src and ERK1/2 in the Vim−/− mice compared to the CT mice (Fig. 5D). Taken together, these data suggest that Vim knockout promotes increased expression of FA proteins and phosphorylation of target proteins in FA signaling.

Knockout of vimentin results in decreased endothelial relaxation and in carotid stiffening

Because changes in contractile protein expression and structural alterations of endothelium may act on vasomotor tone in opposite ways, aortic function was explored in vitro using wire myography. There was a significant increase in phenylephrine-induced contractile responses of aortic rings from Vim−/− mice compared with rings from CT mice (Fig. 6A), characterized by an increased maximal efficiency (Emax, 7.3 ± 0.8 versus 3.7 ± 0.9 mN; p < 0.05) with no change in the negative logarithms of the concentration required to produce 50% contraction (pD2, −6.7 ± 0.1 versus −6.4 ± 0.2). The vasodilatory response to acetylcholine (ACh) was decreased (Fig. 6B) in Vim−/− rings compared to CT rings, with a significant decrease in Emax (32.7 ± 4.4 versus 77.5 ± 4.6%; p < 0.05) but identical pD2 values (−6.1 ± 0.3 in each group). Indomethacin at 10−5 M in addition to Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) at 10−4 M totally abolished ACh-induced relaxation in the 2 groups (Emax = 3.2 ± 1.5 versus 1.8 ± 1.2%). The maximal relaxation induced by sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was similar (Emax = 107.9 ± 2.7 versus 101.8 ± 0.5%. pD2 = −7.7 ± 0.1 versus −7.6 ± 0.1%) between the 2 groups (Fig. 6C), indicating an endothelium-dependent alteration of relaxation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Vascular responses to vasomotor agents in the aorta from Vim−/− and CT mice. (A) Contraction induced by different concentrations of phenylephrine (PE) in intact aortic rings from CT (n = 7) and Vim−/− (n = 6) mice. (B) Endothelium-dependent relaxation in response to different concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh) in either the absence or presence of an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2, indomethacin (10−5 M) and a NO inhibitor, L-NAME (10−4 M) in PE-precontracted aortic rings from Vim−/− and CT mice (n = 7 in each group). (C) Endothelium-independent relaxation induced by different concentrations of the NO donor, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), in PE-precontracted aortic rings from Vim−/− and CT mice (n = 7 in each group).

To further identify the functional consequences of Vim knockout on hemodynamics in vivo, we studied live tissues for biomechanical parameters. Because Synm associates with Vim in arteries, we wished to assess whether knockout of Synm could also affect the hemodynamic and stiffness parameters of Vim−/− mice. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in conscious Vim−/− mice was lower than in CT mice. SAP, diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in anesthetized Vim−/− mice were significantly lower than in CT mice (Table 1). SAP, DAP and MAP were lower in anesthetized Vim−/− Synm−/− mice compared with CT mice whereas there were no differences between Synm−/− and CT mice and between Vim−/− and Vim−/− Synm−/− mice (Table 1).

Table 1.

Blood pressure, mechanical properties and composition of the carotid artery

CT Synm−/− Vim−/− Vim−/−Synm−/−
Number 7 6 6 4
Conscious mice
SAP (mmHg) 109 ± 4 107 ± 4 91 ± 4* 99 ± 4
Anesthetized mice
SAP (mmHg) 113 ± 5 109 ± 5 91 ± 2* 100 ± 4
DAP (mmHg) 79 ± 4 75 ± 5 62 ± 2* 66 ± 4
MAP (mmHg) 91 ± 4 87 ± 5 72 ± 1* 77 ± 4
PP (mmHg) 34 ± 3 34 ± 3 29 ± 3 34 ± 3
HR (beats/min) 438 ± 14 446 ± 18 397 ± 19 401 ± 17
Parameters within common range
MDia80–88 (µm) 510 ± 32 531 ± 34 531 ± 20 522 ± 49
MDist80–88 (10−3 mmHg−1) 13.5 ± 1.9 12.4 ± 2.0 6.3 ± 0.3*§ 6.9 ± 1.2*§
MWS400–800 (kPa) 250 ± 22 245 ± 18 194 ± 5*§ 174 ± 12*§
Histology of the CA
MCSA (mm2 10−3) 25 ± 2 27 ± 1 24 ± 2 31 ± 1*

Values are means ± SEM; CT, control mice; DAP, diastolic arterial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PP, pulse pressure; MDia, mean diameter; MDist, mean distensibility; MWS, mean wall stress. *P < 0.05 versus CT §P < 0.05 versus Synm−/−.

Pulse pressure and heart rate were not different between the four groups. The mean arterial diameter (MDia8088) and lumen cross-sectional area distensibility (MDist80–88) within the 80–88 mmHg common range of arterial pressure were calculated from the Diameter (Dia)/arterial pressure curves (not shown) and Distensibility (Dist)/arterial pressure curves shown in Fig. 7A. MDia80–88 was not different between groups. In Vim−/− and Vim−/− Synm−/− mice, the Dist-arterial pressure curves were significantly shifted downwards from those of Synm−/− and CT mice. The incremental elastic modulus (Einc) / circumferential wall stress (WS) curves are shown in Fig. 7B. The Einc-WS curves of Vim−/− and Vim−/− Synm−/− mice were shifted significantly leftwards compared with the 2 other groups. MDist80–88 and the mean WS within the 400–800 kPa range of Einc (MWS400–800) were decreased in Vim−/− and Vim−/− Synm−/− mice compared to Synm−/− and CT mice. Media cross sectional area (MCSA) of the carotid artery was increased in Vim−/− Synm−/− mice as compared with CT mice.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Mechanical properties of the carotid artery from CT and knockout (Synm−/−, Vim−/− and Vim−/− Synm−/−) mice. Distensibility-arterial pressure curves (A) and incremental elastic modulus (Einc)-wall stress curves (B) in CT (n = 7), Synm−/− (n = 6), Vim−/− (n = 6) and Vim−/− Synm−/− (n = 4) mice.

Thus, knockout of the Vim gene alone induced an increase in arterial stiffness with both structural and functional alterations of vascular tone.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that Vim−/− mice exhibited increased expression of components of the subendothelial basement membrane and a decreased expression of mature SMC differentiation markers. Our study also highlights increased expression of key FA-associated proteins. The main functional consequence is an increase in vascular tone and an alteration of endothelium-dependent relaxation, leading to an increase in carotid stiffness in adult Vim−/− mice, in the absence of hypertension and changes in the elastin/collagen ratio. Our data show that Synm alone has no influence on carotid stiffness. Overall, our study demonstrates that IFs located both in ECs and VSMCs act in concert to regulate cell structure and mechano-transduction pathways.

In rats and mice, most studies that have focused on cellular and molecular determinants of arterial stiffness have looked at local elastic artery distensibility and Einc to analyze directly the structure/function relationship. This is particularly useful to study the effects of genetic manipulations of molecules such as integrins or cytoskeletal proteins involved in endothelial or SMCs. Trachet et al. have shown that in mice, determination of aortic stiffness using pulse wave velocity should be avoided and replaced by local stiffness methods37. Arterial distensibility was compared at equivalent blood pressure levels within the cardiac cycle. Regarding the intrinsic mechanical properties, Einc changes are independent of geometry and blood pressure changes38.

From a functional point of view, blood pressure levels and arterial parameters of Vim−/− Synm−/− mice were not different from those of Vim−/− mice. This finding is largely explained by the fact that Synm requires an appropriate co-polymerization partner, such as Vim in smooth muscle, Des in skeletal and cardiac muscle or keratin IF to form filament networks39,40. The absence of Synm in the carotid of Vim−/− mice confirmed that Synm associates with Vim in vascular cells10,40. The slight medial hypertrophy observed in Vim−/− Synm−/− mice has been observed previously during skeletal muscle hypertrophy through regulation of protein kinase A and Akt signaling in response to mechanical load41. The slight reductions in SAP in conscious mice are likely not related to changes in vasomotor tone and arterial stiffness since our data rather predict an increase in blood pressure. Einc characterizing the stiffness of the wall material is independent of the size of the artery, its thickness and blood pressure changes. In Vim+/+ mice, knockout of Synm had no effect on mechanical properties, indicating that the role of Synm is negligible compared to the role of Vim.

The contribution of Vim to cell mechanical properties is complex and depends on substrate stiffness. It was reported in living cells in culture that Vim-deficient lymphocytes, fibroblasts and glial cells are more deformable indicating a lower cellular stiffness35,4244. However, using atomic force microscopy, it has since been revealed that Vim protects against compressive stress and preserves viscoelastic properties of mouse embryonic fibroblasts under high repetitive strain36. In support of a role for IF in compression, disruption of IFs by acrylamide decreased strain-dependent compressibility in chondrocytes45. The vascular wall is presumed to be incompressible and this assumption is integrated in the determination of the elastic modulus/wall stress curves38. Under physiological conditions, ECs and vascular SMCs are constantly submitted in vivo to pulsatile mechanical forces. Therefore, we can anticipate that pulsatility, even at low mean arterial pressure and unchanged collagen amounts, contributes to the increased stiffness in Vim−/− mice.

The current concept is that the elastin/collagen ratio and cell-matrix interactions are the main factors influencing stiffness of large arteries22,23,46. Our finding of a marked increase in fibronectin, laminin, collagen IV and perlecan in Vim−/− mice, predominantly in the basement membrane underlying the endothelium, is in accord with the role of medial fibronectin accumulation in arterial stiffness reported both in SHR and aldosterone-salt models of hypertension23,38. The higher level of global stiffness of the basement membrane compared to adjacent cells4750 argues for a physiological relevance of the basement membrane in arterial stiffness. The asymmetric organization of basement membrane proteins provides site-specific differences in the biomechanical properties of cells49,51. In the eye, it has been reported that the epithelial site is stiffer than the stromal site49,51. In large arteries, there are limitations to analyze these site-specific properties in vascular stiffness changes. However, the relevant functional marker of basement membrane stiffness is its density, which is increased in Vim−/− mice as assessed by electron microscopy. Laminin, one of the major functional components of basement membranes, is considered to provide the main cell binding activity of basement membranes, and the collagen IV network is considered as the main stabilizing structure. The increase in thickness as observed by immunofluorescence staining may be attributed to heparan sulfate proteoglycan accumulation since perlecan has been proposed to bind growth factors and to regulate the hydration status of basement membranes. When compared with previous data reported in Des−/− mice33, the 53% decrease in distensibility in Vim−/− mice is 1.8-fold more than the 29% decrease in Des−/− mice, indicating that vascular stiffness is higher in Vim−/− mice than in Des−/− mice. It should be emphasized that Des is present only in SMCs while Vim is present in both SMCs and ECs. The observation that in Des−/− mice, only collagen IV expression was increased (supplementary Fig. S1) indicates a crucial role of basement membrane laminin, fibronectin and perlecan in the stiffness of Vim−/− mice. The increase in these proteins may reflect endothelial activation, a hypothesis supported by the increase in specific markers such as VWF and VE-cadherin. In addition, location of part of VWF below perlecan staining suggests strongly an important structural reorganization leading to stiffening of the subendothelium. It has been reported that subendothelial matrix stiffening is necessary and sufficient to promote endothelial activation in vitro52. However, the increased vasoconstriction and decreased endothelium-dependent relaxation supports the hypothesis that vasomotor tone contributes to arterial stiffening in Vim−/− mice. This is also in agreement with previous studies showing that mechanical de-endothelialization in rats or knockout of Des increases the viscous behavior of the arterial wall33,53. Whether these biomechanical changes are chronically associated with endothelial basement membrane remodeling remains to be investigated.

The contribution of vascular SMCs to arterial stiffness has been assessed by the expression of specific markers of mature smooth muscle cells and cell-matrix interactions. In Vim−/− mice, the decreased expression of SM-actin, SM-MHC and smoothelin at the protein level, together with a decrease in finger-like projections, indicates a SMC phenotypic change towards a less differentiated state. Decreased SM-actin, SM-MHC and smoothelin at the protein level, but not at the mRNA level, in Vim−/− mice suggests that vimentin could influence the stability of these proteins. It has been suggested that plectin sidearms on IFs link them to the microtubules, actomyosin in stress fibres and membrane components. Cells lacking vimentin present an altered interaction of plectin-microtubule and plectin-myosin54. In Des−/− mice, deficient SMC-matrix interactions related to SMC dedifferentiation resulted in increased arterial stiffness. The increased arterial stiffness in Vim−/− mice, also exhibiting a reduction in finger-like projections, is again consistent with a role of cell-matrix interactions in arterial stiffening.

The relationship between a reduction in actomyosin content and contractility appears to be very complex. Indeed, excitation/contraction coupling is not only dependent on the degree of differentiation but also on the general molecular environment of SMCs. Recently it has been reported in cancer cells and fibroblasts that vimentin depletion induced phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated GEF-H1, and thereby increased RhoA activity, myosin light chain phosphorylation, actin stress fiber assembly and cell contractility55. In the present study, the expression of genes coding for RhoA, cofilin, calponin 1, caldesmon, myosin regulatory light polypeptide 9 and the regulators of myosin light phosphatase MYPT1 and CPI-17 remained unchanged at both the mRNA and protein levels. The thicker endothelial cell basement membrane and the increase in subendothelial matrix synthesis are unlikely to enable bioactive compounds abnormally released from non-vascular tissues due to vimentin knockout to enter the media by radial conductance from the blood. Our data are thus more in favor of intravascular mechanisms of Vim knockout-mediated arterial stiffening even though such compounds could, in theory, alter endothelial function and gene expression in SMCs.

Vim plays an important role in the turnover of FAs and in the process of formation and release of integrin endocytic vesicles. Vim, highly expressed in ECs of adult mice, is a component of junctional complexes that couple VE-cadherin to both actin and the IF cytoskeleton56 and to FAs1619 where it binds to integrins via VAMs20,21. In vascular SMCs, activation and the dynamic activity of FA are likely involved in aortic stiffness57. Changes in mRNA in Vim−/− mice support the hypothesis of an increase in FA turnover mainly in ECs. Indeed, the increased expression of genes coding for components of the angiopoietin-2/Tie2/αvβ3 integrin axis in Vim−/− mice suggests that the loss of Vim stimulates FA turnover in ECs via internalization and degradation of αvβ358. There is no specific role in FA for E-cadherin, whose mRNA level is decreased markedly, except in cancer-induced cell proliferation where its expression is associated with Vim59. The increases in mRNA of genes encoding VE-cadherin and VEGFR2 may rather limit EC permeability via enhanced formation of VE-cadherin/VEGFR2 complexes in adherent junctions60. Increased mRNA for claudin, ZO-1 and JAM-1 may participate also in the regulation of the EC barrier function. The increase in Ednrb mRNA is consistent with a role of the encoded receptor in FAK and paxillin phosphorylation, thus favoring FA formation61.

In vascular SMCs, our results show clearly an increase in the three main protein entities of FA, αvβ3 integrin, talin and vinculin. These observations are in line with the reported role of Vim in reducing FA size but not FA half-life in metastatic fibroblast cells expressing high levels of endogenous Vim34. An enlargement of FA has also been shown in cultured Vim-deficient fibroblasts independently of tension conditions5. In Vim−/− mice, the increase in phosphorylation of the major mechanosensory molecule, FAK, and its downstream targets, Src and ERK1/2, resulting from integrin engagement is consistent with an increase in FA assembly and disassembly rates. Assuming that the number of SMCs is higher than the number of ECs in the entire vascular wall, these data suggest that activation of FAs in the media, is the major contributor to the increased arterial stiffness in Vim−/− mice. One limitation of our study is that we did not measure SMC stiffness that could be increased regarding the changes of these FA proteins. However, more generally, the exact contribution of cell stiffness to that of the global arterial wall remains unclear and requires further in vivo and in vitro experiments. Taken together, our results suggest that in carotid arteries under physiological pressure and flow, Vim, but not Synm levels, control subendothelial matrix stiffening, vasoreactivity, vascular SMC differentiation and FA turnover. Hence, our study identifies a new mechanistic role of Vim IF in regulating cell-matrix interactions in arterial stiffness.

Material and Methods

Animals

Mice, knocked out for Vim (Vim−/−), synemin (Synm−/−) and desmin (Des−/−) on a C57BL/6 N background, were obtained and genotyped by PCR as described previously33,41,62. All mice were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled facility with a 12 h light/day cycle. In this study, six-month old Vim−/−, Synm−/−, and Vim−/− Synm−/− mice were used for in vivo arterial mechanical property measurements. Wild-type and heterozygous mice were used as controls (CT). Des−/− mice were used to analyze Vim and Synm colocalization in carotid arteries. For molecular and cellular analysis, age-matched (Vim−/− and CT) mice were used. All animal studies were approved by the Organ for Prevention and Wellbeing of Animals of Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) and the Comité d’Ethique Lorrain en Matière d’Experimentation Animale (CELMEA) and conducted according to French and European laws, directives, and regulations on animal care.

In vivo arterial mechanical parameters

Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured in conscious animals using a tail-cuff sphygmomanometer (Hatteras Instruments, Inc., NC, USA). With an ultrasonic echotracking device (NIUS-01, Asulab SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland), we recorded arterial diameter (Dia, left carotid artery) and arterial pressure (right carotid artery) simultaneously in isoflurane-anesthetized mice as described previously30. The relation between arterial pressure (AP) and lumen cross-sectional area (LCSA) was fitted by an arctangent function. LCSA distensibility (Dist), a derivative of this function, was used to assess global elastic behaviour of the artery. Circumferential wall stress (WS) and incremental elastic modulus (Einc), which characterizes the intrinsic mechanical properties of the wall material, were calculated with the above-mentioned parameters and the media cross sectional area (MCSA).

Vascular reactivity analysis

Vascular contractile and relaxing responses were assessed in isolated thoracic aortas from Vim−/− and CT mice as described previously30. Briefly, aortas were excised, cut into 2.5 mm segments and mounted in a wire myograph (DMT, Aarhus, DK) in an 8 mL organ bath containing oxygenated physiological salt solution (pH 7.4) maintained at 37 °C. Rings were allowed to equilibrate for 30 min at a resting tension of 1 g, changing the bath medium every 10 minutes. All preparations were contracted maximally with an isotonic KCl solution (80 mM) and then with a submaximal concentration of phenylephrine (PE, 10−5 M) to assess contractile capacity of each ring. The α-adrenergic pathway was assessed via the contraction induced by PE (10−9 to 10−5 M). To evaluate endothelium-dependent relaxation, the dose response to acetylcholine (ACh, 10−9 to 10−4 M) was determined in rings precontracted by 10−5 M PE, in the presence or absence of 10−5 M indomethacin, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 and 2 enzymes plus 10−4 M Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide (NO) inhibitor. Vascular SMC sensitivity to the NO pathway was also assessed by the dose-response to the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10−9 to 10−4 M) in rings precontracted with PE (10−5 M). The maximal response (Emax) and the concentration of agonist inducing 50% of the maximal response (EC50) were extrapolated from the individual concentration-effect curves. These latter values were transformed into pD2 values, i.e. negative logarithms of EC50 values.

Histological Procedures

Histological studies were performed on carotid arteries (CA) fixed with 10% buffered formalin under pressure in vivo. For morphological analysis, all arterial samples were embedded in paraffin and 5 μm sections were stained with Sirius red for collagen and Weigert’s resorcin-fuchsin for elastic fibres. The density was calculated by drawing boxes of equal size on each cross-section of carotid artery. The intensity of staining was averaged over 5 to 7 boxes/sample for Weigert’s resorcin-fuchsin staining and 10 boxes/sample for Sirius red staining, for each mouse artery fixed under pressure. Composition of the arterial wall and the MCSA were determined by computer-directed image analysis.

Immunohistochemistry

Seven-micrometer transverse frozen sections were prepared from carotid arteries and aortas of mice as described previously30. The sections were incubated with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 1) against fibronectin, E-cadherin, SM-MHC, laminin, Perlecan, αv integrin subunit, Collagen IV. α-SM-actin, smoothelin, Vim, Synm, Des, CD31, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and VE-cadherin. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated for 1 hour with secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, Saint Aubin, France). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI or DRAQ5. After washing in PBS, slides were mounted using fluoromount aqueous medium (Sigma). Images were captured using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss SP5, France) and basement membrane thickness was determined from 3 different mice.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNAs were extracted from carotid arteries using TRI Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and were reverse transcribed with the high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) and random hexamers to generate cDNAs. PCR analysis was then performed with SYBR green PCR technology (Roche). The Primer3 program (frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/) was used to select primers (Supplementary Table 2) and the housekeeping gene, GAPDH, was used to normalize expression levels.

Western blot analysis

Immunoblotting was carried out as described previously41 using carotid arteries or aortas from Vim−/− and control mice. Vessels were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after dissection. Frozen vessels were placed into an ice-cold homogenization buffer containing: 50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 250 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 0.5% NP40, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM glycerophosphate and 2% of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). Samples were homogenized using an ultraturrax, incubated 30 min on ice and then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin as standard. Equal amounts of protein extracts (15 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE before electrophoretic transfer onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Hybond-ECL, GE Healthcare, Velizy-Villacoublay, France).

Electron microscopy

The carotid artery was isolated from mice and fixed in a Carson solution of pH 7.2 (3.5% formaldehyde, 110 mM Na2HPO4). All samples were processed as described previously30 and embedded in Epon. Ultrathin sections were observed with a Zeiss omega TEM microscope. Quantitative analysis on TEM images was performed by using ImageJ 1.46r, developed at the National Institutes of Health, USA, and freely available at https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/. To quantify the mean intensity of the subendothelial basement membrane, arbitrarily chosen fragments underneath 6–16 cells from triplicate mice where measured along a straight line; the mean gray value obtained was subtracted from the background, corresponding to the artery lumen, and normalized as a fold induction over the control mean value (i.e. the gray value of a wt tissue) acquired with the same settings in the same microscopy session.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as means ± SEM. Differences between groups were assessed with the unpaired Student’s t-test. Dist and Einc were log transformed to generate linear relations63. The quality of the transformation was checked by calculating the R² of the linear regression obtained with the new parameters for each individual. After this transformation, we calculated the mean slopes of the curves. If the slopes were not significantly different, we compared the curves by calculating the median values of the common range of either AP for Dia, Dist or Einc for WS. AP and arterial mechanical parameters were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis multiple-comparison tests. Differences were considered significant at values of p < 0.05.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary data (6.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Pr. Denise Paulin and Cecile Denis for fruitful discussions, the IBPS platform for electron microscopy and confocal microscopy analysis, Dr. Michael Trichet for the acquisition of the images and for his helpful discussion, Dr. Mary Osborne-Pellegrin and Pr. Simon N. Thornton for the English. This work was supported by Inserm and CNRS, the Université de Lorraine, The Nancy University Hospital, the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR-13-BSV1-0026-01) and the Region Lorraine. Lei TIAN is a recipient of Chinese Scholarship Council fellowship.

Author Contributions

B.L. and E.B. contributed equally to this work as first authors. P.L. and Z.L. contributed equally to this work as last authors. B.L. and E.B. contributed significantly to the experiments; A.P. performed confocal immunofluorescence analysis; M.B. performed the functional experiments; J.G.L. and L.T. participated in the experimental work; J.B. and D.C. performed the electron microscopy analysis; E.B., C.L. and Z.R.C. performed vascular reactivity analysis. P.C., V.R., P.L. and Z.L. participated in the analysis of the data and in the writing of the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Benoit Langlois and Ekaterina Belozertseva contributed equally to this work.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22187-y.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-12024-z.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Gruenbaum Y, Aebi U. Intermediate filaments: a dynamic network that controls cell mechanics. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:54. doi: 10.12703/P6-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim S, Coulombe PA. Intermediate filament scaffolds fulfill mechanical, organizational, and signaling functions in the cytoplasm. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1581–1597. doi: 10.1101/gad.1552107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Snider NT, Omary MB. Post-translational modifications of intermediate filament proteins: mechanisms and functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:163–177. doi: 10.1038/nrm3753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Winter DL, Paulin D, Mericskay M, Li Z. Posttranslational modifications of desmin and their implication in biological processes and pathologies. Histochem Cell Biol. 2014;141:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00418-013-1148-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gregor M, et al. Mechanosensing through focal adhesion-anchored intermediate filaments. FASEB J. 2014;28:715–729. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-231829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leube RE, Moch M, Windoffer R. Intermediate filaments and the regulation of focal adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;32:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:849–854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johansson B, Eriksson A, Virtanen I, Thornell LE. Intermediate filament proteins in adult human arteries. Anat Rec. 1997;247:439–448. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199704)247:4&#x0003c;439::AID-AR1&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wede OK, Lofgren M, Li Z, Paulin D, Arner A. Mechanical function of intermediate filaments in arteries of different size examined using desmin deficient mice. J Physiol. 2002;540:941–949. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.014910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Izmiryan A, Franco CA, Paulin D, Li Z, Xue Z. Synemin isoforms during mouse development: multiplicity of partners in vascular and neuronal systems. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:769–783. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Small JV, Gimona M. The cytoskeleton of the vertebrate smooth muscle cell. Acta Physiol Scand. 1998;164:341–348. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.00441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun N, Critchley DR, Paulin D, Li Z, Robson RM. Human alpha-synemin interacts directly with vinculin and metavinculin. Biochem J. 2008;409:657–667. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sun N, Critchley DR, Paulin D, Li Z, Robson RM. Identification of a repeated domain within mammalian alpha-synemin that interacts directly with talin. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:1839–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun N, Huiatt TW, Paulin D, Li Z, Robson RM. Synemin interacts with the LIM domain protein zyxin and is essential for cell adhesion and migration. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uyama N, et al. Hepatic stellate cells express synemin, a protein bridging intermediate filaments to focal adhesions. Gut. 2006;55:1276–1289. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.078865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bhattacharya R, et al. Recruitment of vimentin to the cell surface by beta3 integrin and plectin mediates adhesion strength. J Cell Sci 122, 1390-1400. 2009 doi: 10.1242/jcs.043042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Esue O, Carson AA, Tseng Y, Wirtz D. A direct interaction between actin and vimentin filaments mediated by the tail domain of vimentin. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:30393–30399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605452200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kreis S, Schonfeld HJ, Melchior C, Steiner B, Kieffer N. The intermediate filament protein vimentin binds specifically to a recombinant integrin alpha2/beta1 cytoplasmic tail complex and co-localizes with native alpha2/beta1 in endothelial cell focal adhesions. Exp Cell Res. 2005;305:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsuruta D, Jones JC. The vimentin cytoskeleton regulates focal contact size and adhesion of endothelial cells subjected to shear stress. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:4977–4984. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gonzales M, et al. Structure and function of a vimentin-associated matrix adhesion in endothelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:85–100. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ivaska J, Pallari HM, Nevo J, Eriksson JE. Novel functions of vimentin in cell adhesion, migration, and signaling. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313:2050–2062. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Humphrey JD, Harrison DG, Figueroa CA, Lacolley P, Laurent S. Central Artery Stiffness in Hypertension and Aging: A Problem With Cause and Consequence. Circ Res. 2016;118:379–381. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lacolley P, et al. Increased carotid wall elastic modulus and fibronectin in aldosterone-salt-treated rats: effects of eplerenone. Circulation. 2002;106:2848–2853. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000039328.33137.6C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu Y, et al. Temporal analysis of vascular smooth muscle cell elasticity and adhesion reveals oscillation waveforms that differ with aging. Aging Cell. 2012;11:741–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00840.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qiu H, et al. Short communication: vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness as a mechanism for increased aortic stiffness with aging. Circ Res. 2010;107:615–619. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.221846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sehgel NL, et al. Increased vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness: a novel mechanism for aortic stiffness in hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;305:H1281–1287. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00232.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sehgel NL, Vatner SF, Meininger GA. “Smooth Muscle Cell Stiffness Syndrome”-Revisiting the Structural Basis of Arterial Stiffness. Front Physiol. 2015;6:335. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lacolley P, Li Z, Challande P, Regnault V. SRF/myocardin: a novel molecular axis regulating vascular smooth muscle cell stiffening in hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113:120–122. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou N, et al. Inhibition of SRF/myocardin reduces aortic stiffness by targeting vascular smooth muscle cell stiffening in hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113:171–182. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Galmiche G, et al. Inactivation of serum response factor contributes to decrease vascular muscular tone and arterial stiffness in mice. Circ Res. 2013;112:1035–1045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laurent S, Boutouyrie P. The structural factor of hypertension: large and small artery alterations. Circ Res. 2015;116:1007–1021. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brandes RP, Fleming I, Busse R. Endothelial aging. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;66:286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lacolley P, et al. Mechanical properties and structure of carotid arteries in mice lacking desmin. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;51:178–187. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00278-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Terriac, E. et al. Vimentin Levels and Serine 71 Phosphorylation in the Control of Cell-Matrix Adhesions, Migration Speed, and Shape of Transformed Human Fibroblasts. Cells6, doi:10.3390/cells6010002 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Eckes B, et al. Impaired mechanical stability, migration and contractile capacity in vimentin-deficient fibroblasts. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 13):1897–1907. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.13.1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mendez MG, Restle D, Janmey PA. Vimentin enhances cell elastic behavior and protects against compressive stress. Biophys J. 2014;107:314–323. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Trachet B, et al. Performance comparison of ultrasound-based methods to assess aortic diameter and stiffness in normal and aneurysmal mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bezie Y, et al. Fibronectin expression and aortic wall elastic modulus in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1027–1034. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.18.7.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Khanamiryan L, Li Z, Paulin D, Xue Z. Self-assembly incompetence of synemin is related to the property of its head and rod domains. Biochemistry. 2008;47:9531–9539. doi: 10.1021/bi800912w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xue ZG, et al. The mouse synemin gene encodes three intermediate filament proteins generated by alternative exon usage and different open reading frames. Exp Cell Res. 2004;298:431–444. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li Z, et al. Synemin acts as a regulator of signalling molecules during skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:4589–4601. doi: 10.1242/jcs.143164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brown MJ, Hallam JA, Colucci-Guyon E, Shaw S. Rigidity of circulating lymphocytes is primarily conferred by vimentin intermediate filaments. J Immunol. 2001;166:6640–6646. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lu YB, et al. Reactive glial cells: increased stiffness correlates with increased intermediate filament expression. FASEB J. 2011;25:624–631. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-163790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang N, Stamenovic D. Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279:C188–194. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.1.C188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ofek G, Wiltz DC, Athanasiou KA. Contribution of the cytoskeleton to the compressive properties and recovery behavior of single cells. Biophys J. 2009;97:1873–1882. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lacolley P, Challande P, Osborne-Pellegrin M, Regnault V. Genetics and pathophysiology of arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;81:637–648. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Candiello J, et al. Biomechanical properties of native basement membranes. FEBS J. 2007;274:2897–2908. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Candiello J, Cole GJ, Halfter W. Age-dependent changes in the structure, composition and biophysical properties of a human basement membrane. Matrix Biol. 2010;29:402–410. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Halfter W, et al. The bi-functional organization of human basement membranes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Henrich PB, et al. Nanoscale topographic and biomechanical studies of the human internal limiting membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2561–2570. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Halfter W, et al. New concepts in basement membrane biology. FEBS J. 2015;282:4466–4479. doi: 10.1111/febs.13495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang X, et al. Basement membrane stiffening promotes retinal endothelial activation associated with diabetes. FASEB J. 2016;30:601–611. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-277962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boutouyrie P, et al. In vivo/in vitro comparison of rat abdominal aorta wall viscosity. Influence of endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1346–1355. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.17.7.1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Svitkina TM, Verkhovsky AB, Borisy GG. Plectin sidearms mediate interaction of intermediate filaments with microtubules and other components of the cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 1996;135:991–1007. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.4.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jiu Y, et al. Vimentin intermediate filaments control actin stress fiber assembly through GEF-H1 and RhoA. J Cell Sci. 2017;130:892–902. doi: 10.1242/jcs.196881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kowalczyk AP, et al. VE-cadherin and desmoplakin are assembled into dermal microvascular endothelial intercellular junctions: a pivotal role for plakoglobin in the recruitment of desmoplakin to intercellular junctions. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 20):3045–3057. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.20.3045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Saphirstein RJ, et al. The focal adhesion: a regulated component of aortic stiffness. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Thomas M, et al. Angiopoietin-2 stimulation of endothelial cells induces alphavbeta3 integrin internalization and degradation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:23842–23849. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.097543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wei J, et al. Overexpression of vimentin contributes to prostate cancer invasion and metastasis via src regulation. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tian Y, Gawlak G, O’Donnell JJ, 3rd, Birukova AA, Birukov KG. Activation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Receptor 2 Mediates Endothelial Permeability Caused by Cyclic Stretch. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:10032–10045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.690487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lange K, et al. Endothelin receptor type B counteracts tenascin-C-induced endothelin receptor type A-dependent focal adhesion and actin stress fiber disorganization. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6163–6173. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Colucci-Guyon E, et al. Mice lacking vimentin develop and reproduce without an obvious phenotype. Cell. 1994;79:679–694. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90553-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Louis H, et al. Role of alpha1beta1-integrin in arterial stiffness and angiotensin-induced arterial wall hypertrophy in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293:H2597–2604. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00299.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data (6.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES