Skip to main content
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences logoLink to Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
. 2016 Dec 22;16(2):91–92. doi: 10.2463/mrms.ci.2016-0082

Synthetic MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis

Christina Andica 1,*, Akifumi Hagiwara 1,2, Misaki Nakazawa 1,3, Kanako K Kumamaru 1, Masaaki Hori 1, Mitsuru Ikeno 4, Toshiaki Shimizu 4, Shigeki Aoki 1
PMCID: PMC5600066  PMID: 28003620

In infancy, the clinical presentation of meningitis is usually nonspecific and cerebrospinal fluid analysis is less useful.1 Contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging technique for detecting meningitis and CE T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) is the preferred sequence at many institutions.2 However, CE fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) reportedly has a higher sensitivity than CE T1WI.2

Synthetic MRI is a method based on quantification of the T1 and T2 relaxation times, the proton density (PD), and the amplitude of the local radio frequency B1 field by a single scan.3 With this technique, tailored contrast-weighted images can be acquired with a significant reduction in examination time.

A seven-week-old female infant was hospitalized with a diagnosis of probable bacterial meningitis. Lumbar puncture was performed unsuccessfully. Blood examination showed elevated CRP and blood culture was positive for group B streptococcus.

A 3T MR system (Discovery MR750w, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) with a twelve-channel head coil was used for all imaging. Synthetic images were created using SyMRI StandAlone software (SyntheticMR AB, Linköping, Sweden). The patient underwent conventional and quantitative imaging before and after intravenous administration of contrast agent (Gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight). CE conventional T1 weighted inversion recovery (T1IR), FLAIR, and quantitative MRI were performed 3, 8 and 16 minutes after contrast agent administration, respectively. In our institution, quantitative MRI was performed routinely in pediatric patients because of its usefulness.4

Parameters of synthetic non-CE and CE T1IR (TR 2020 ms, TE 17 ms, TI 840 ms) and FLAIR (TR 9000 ms, TE 122 ms, TI 2320 ms) were adjusted retrospectively to be the same as conventional T1IR (TR 2023.4 ms, TE 17.4 ms, TI 832 ms), and FLAIR (TR 9000 ms, TE 121.74 ms, TI 2472.6 ms). Non-CE conventional (Fig. 1A and B) and synthetic (Fig. 2A and B) MRI showed bilateral subdural effusion. Conventional CE T1IR (Fig. 1C) did not show enhancement but CE FLAIR (Fig. 1D) showed a subtle enhancement in the subdural effusion area that represents a contrast agent leakage into the effusion secondary to meningitis. Formation of the vascularized outer membrane of subdural effusion and extravasation of plasma from the blood vessels causes higher gadolinium (Gd) concentration in the effusion.5 Synthetic CE T1IR (Fig. 2C) also showed a subtle enhancement, but more obvious than conventional CE T1IR MR Image. More apparent enhancement on the synthetic MRI might have been caused by higher concentrations of Gd that leakage into the effusion due to longer duration time after contrast material administration. However, synthetic CE FLAIR (Fig. 2D) showed enhancement more clearly. Moreover, synthetic double IR (DIR) images also can be acquired with any combination of TI. In this case, synthetic CE DIR (TR 15000 ms. TE 100 ms, TI 260 ms, TI2 3100 ms) (Fig. 2E) showed enhancement even more clearly by nulling the CSF and minimizing the signal of fat.3

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Conventional MRI. (A) T1IR and (B) FLAIR show subdural effusion (arrowheads). CE (C) T1IR does not show enhancement but (D) FLAIR shows a subtle enhancement in the subdural effusion area (arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery; T1IR, T1 weighted inversion recovery.

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Synthetic MRI. (A) T1IR and (B) FLAIR show subdural effusion (arrowheads). CE (C) T1IR shows subtle enhancements (arrows). CE (D) FLAIR and (E) DIR show a clear enhancement in the subdural effusion area (arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; T1IR, T1 weighted inversion recovery; DIR, double IR; CE, Contrast-enhanced.

Bacterial meningitis is a potentially life threatening neurological emergency requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment.2 CE FLAIR has a high sensitivity to meningeal pathology even with low concentrations of gadolinium,2 but is not performed routinely. In synthetic MRI, CE FLAIR images can be easily made after the image acquisition. This case showed that synthetic CE FLAIR appears superior to conventional CE T1-IR and FLAIR in the diagnosis of meningitis.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Barkovich AJ. Pediatric Neuroimaging. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011; 814–821. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Splendiani A, Puglielli E, De Amicis R, Necozione S, Masciocchi C, Gallucci M. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR in the early diagnosis of infectious meningitis. Neuroradiology 2005; 47:591–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hagiwara A, Nakazawa M, Andica C, et al. Dural enhancement in a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome revealed by double inversion recovery image using synthetic MRI. Magn Reson Med Sci 2016; 15:151–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Andica C, Hagiwara A, Nakazawa M, et al. The advantage of synthetic MRI for the visualization of early white matter change in an infant with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Magn Reson Med Sci 2016; 15:347–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mori K, Maeda M. Delayed Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gd-DTPA differentiates subdural hygroma and subdural effusion. Surg Neurol 2000; 53:303–310; discussion 310–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

RESOURCES