Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 15;7:11687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10350-w

MAD2B acts as a negative regulatory partner of TCF4 on proliferation in human dermal papilla cells

Nanlan Yu 1,#, Zhiqiang Song 1,#, Kezhou Zhang 2, Xichuan Yang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5601462  PMID: 28916740

Abstract

Dermal papilla cells (DPCs) are important components of hair follicles and play a critical role in hair follicle development. However, the mechanisms by which DPCs induce hair follicle development remain unclear. In the present study, we identified the mitotic arrest deficient protein MAD2B as a modifier of DPCs. Overexpression of MAD2B inhibited DPC aggregative growth and proliferation induced by the Wnt signaling activator T cell factor 4 (TCF4), and decreased TCF4-induced expression and the release of hair growth-related cytokines, including hepatocyte growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor in DPCs. In contrast, knockdown of MAD2B promoted TCF4-induced DPC proliferation, but did not affect the expression and secretion of cytokines by TCF4-induced DPCs. These results suggest a functional antagonism between MAD2B and TCF4 in DPC-induced hair follicle development. Mechanistically, MAD2B physically interacted with TCF4 to repress TCF4 transcriptional activity via β-catenin mediation, leading to reduced β-catenin/TCF4-dependent transactivation and Wnt signaling activity. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that MAD2B plays a negative role in TCF4-induced DPC growth and proliferation.

Introduction

Human hair serves many functions, including thermal regulation, protection of the skin, sensory perception, as well as an aesthetic purpose1. Alopecia (hair loss) is a common chronic dermatological disorder that, although not life threatening or physically harmful, may result in psychological consequences such as anxiety and depression

2. Current medical treatments for hair loss include drug-induced hair growth promotion and hair transplantation, both of which require the formation of new hair follicles, from which hairs emerge1. Thus, a better understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the neogenesis of hair follicles is highly significant for the treatment of alopecia.

The hair follicle is structurally composed of epidermal and dermal portions3, and undergoes cyclical phases of growth (anagen), regression (catagen), and quiescence (telogen), throughout postnatal life4,5. Located at the base of the hair follicle, a population of mesenchymal cells, known as dermal papilla cells (DPCs), is characterized by aggregative behavior when cultured in vitro and the ability to induce new hair follicle formation during both embryonic and postnatal life6–8. DPCs promote hair follicle formation and development through the interplay of various signaling pathways such as Wnt, Bmp, Shh, and Notch9,10. Amongst these, Wnt/β-catenin signaling was the first identified and is considered the most important. Wnt/β-catenin signaling functions in hair follicle induction mainly through the binding of β-catenin to members of the lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF)/T cell factor (TCF) family of DNA binding proteins. This is triggered by Wnt-receptor interaction-induced β-catenin stabilization and translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus11–14.

In our previous study, TCF4, a member of the LEF/TCF family that is encoded by the Tcf7l2 gene, was found to be upregulated in DPCs in anagen hair follicles15. TCF4 and β-catenin form a complex in the nucleus, leading to transcriptional activation of downstream genes in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway16. Furthermore, TCF4 is highly expressed in in vitro cultured low-passage (1‒3) DPCs, displaying an aggregative growth pattern that facilitates hair follicle induction. However, high-passage (>10) DPCs tend to lose their inductive ability during passaging17–19, suggesting that TCF4 is closely related to DPC proliferation and hair follicle neogenesis.

The mitotic arrest deficient protein MAD2B, a homolog of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD220,21, has been identified as a TCF4-interacting partner. MAD2B blocks TCF4-mediated transactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling cascade in the epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation of colorectal cancer cells22. These findings prompted us to hypothesize that MAD2B/TCF4 interaction may suppress TCF4-induced DPC growth and proliferation by inactivating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. To test this hypothesis, we constructed adenoviral and plasmid vectors expressing MAD2B, TCF4, and short hairpin RNA against MAD2B. By transducing or transfecting these vectors, alone or in combination, into DPCs, we examined the role of MAD2B in TCF4-induced DPC growth and proliferation and explored the possible mechanisms involved.

Results

MAD2B inhibits the aggregative growth of DPCs

DPCs proliferate in a pronounced aggregative pattern in vitro, which has been shown to be important for their hair-inductive ability18,23–26. Furthermore, MAD2B plays a potential role in cell cycle arrest by inhibiting the anaphase-promoting complex (APC)27. To determine if MAD2B affects the aggregative growth of DPCs, an adenoviral vector expressing MAD2B was transfected into DPCs. As shown in Fig. 1, MAD2B-overexpressing DPCs exhibited a gradual loss of aggregative behavior in a time-dependent manner. After 48 h of transfection, the DPCs were loosely arranged and the aggregative behavior was clearly diminished (Fig. 1, middle panel). In contrast, the empty vector-transfected DPCs maintained the aggregative behavior and grew in clusters (Fig. 1, upper panel). Interestingly, MAD2 appeared to have no inhibitory effect on aggressive behavior of DPCs (Fig. 1, lower panel). These data suggest that MAD2B plays a specific role in inhibiting the aggregative growth of DPCs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

MAD2B overexpression suppresses the aggregative growth of DPCs. DPCs were transduced with a control vector (upper panels) or an adenoviral vector expressing MAD2B (middle panels) or MAD2 (lower panels) over time, as indicated. Micrographs were captured at 100 × magnification. DPCs, dermal papilla cells.

MAD2B suppresses TCF4-induced DPC proliferation

Since our previous study indicated that TCF4 promoted DPC proliferation in vitro19, we next sought to examine whether MAD2B plays a role in TCF4-induced DPC proliferation. A CCK-8 assay was performed on DPCs transfected with TCF4- and MAD2B-expressing vectors and siMAD2B, individually or in combination. As shown in Fig. 2, the viability of DPCs transduced with TCF4 alone significantly increased in a time-dependent manner compared to the empty vector-transfected control group. However, the MAD2B-overexpressing DPCs proliferated at a comparable rate to control cells, suggesting that MAD2B has a minimal effect on DPC proliferation. Interestingly, DPCs co-transduced with TCF4- and MAD2B-expressing vectors exhibited a significantly lower proliferation rate than the DPCs transduced with TCF4 alone, suggesting that MAD2B has an inhibitory effect on TCF4-induced DPC proliferation. In contrast, DPCs co-transfected with TCF4-expressing vector and siMAD2B showed a dramatically higher proliferation rate than any other group, suggesting that TCF4-induced DPC proliferation can be further enhanced by knockdown of MAD2B. Taken together, these results indicate that MAD2B antagonizes TCF4 in DPC proliferation and point to the functional interaction between TCF4 and MAD2B in DPCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effect of MAD2B on TCF4-induced DPC proliferation. DPCs were transfected with the vectors, as indicated, for 1‒7 d. The cell viability was determined through CCK-8 assays. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. control; n = 3. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; TCF4, T cell factor 4; DPCs, dermal papilla cells.

MAD2B inhibits TCF4-induced expression and release of cytokines in DPCs

To further confirm the functional interaction between MAD2B and TCF4, we examined the effects of MAD2B on the expression and release of certain hair growth-associated cytokines, including HGF, IGF-1, and VEGF, in TCF4-overexpressing DPCs. Consistent with the role of TCF4 in DPC proliferation, TCF4 overexpression promoted mRNA and protein expression of these cytokines in DPCs, which was effectively inhibited by overexpression of MAD2B (Fig. 3A and B). On the other hand, knockdown of MAD2B appeared not to markedly augment the cytokine-promoting effect of TCF4 (Fig. 3A and B), suggesting that MAD2B, while influential, is not essential to regulate TCF4 function. Furthermore, MAD2B suppressed the secretion of these cytokines by TCF4-overexpressing DPCs (Fig. 3C). Collectively, these results suggest that the function of TCF4 in cytokine production and secretion negatively correlates with MAD2B.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of MAD2B on TCF4-mediated mRNA and protein expression and secretion of cytokines in DPCs. DPCs were transfected with the vectors, as indicated, for 24 h. Q-PCR, Western blot and ELISA were performed to examine the mRNA expression (A), protein expression (B), and secretion (C) of HGF, IGF-1, and VEGF, respectively. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. control; n = 3. TCF4, T cell factor 4; DPCs, dermal papilla cells.

MAD2B physically interacts with TCF4 in DPCs

Considering that the above findings indicate a functional interaction between MAD2B and TCF4, we next sought to examine whether MAD2B and TCF4 physically interact with each other. A Co-IP assay demonstrated that MAD2B, but not MAD2, was specifically bound to TCF4 in MAD2B/TCF4-co-overexpressing DPCs (Fig. 4A). A reverse Co-IP assay showed that TCF4 was specifically bound to MAD2B (Fig. 4B). These results suggest a physical interaction between MAD2B and TCF4, which is consistent with previous findings22. Furthermore, our results confirmed that overexpression of β-catenin, an essential component of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, does not affect the interaction between MAD2B and TCF4. (Fig. 4C). Collectively, these data suggest that the ternary complex of MAD2B/TCF4/β-catenin may play an important role in DPC growth and hair follicle development.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

MAD2B physically interacts with TCF4. DPCs were transduced with the vectors, as indicated, for 24 h. Cell lysates were collected and immunoprecipitated with IgG (negative control), TCF4 antibody (A and C), or MAD2B antibody (B). The immunoprecipitates were blotted with MAD2B (A), TCF4 (B), and MAD2B/β-catenin (C). The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. IgG, Immunoglobulin G; TCF4, T cell factor 4; DPCs, dermal papilla cells.

MAD2B is involved in the β-catenin/TCF4-mediated Wnt signaling pathway

To further investigate the molecular mechanisms underpinning DPC growth and proliferation, we performed a luciferase reporter gene assay. As shown in Fig. 5A, the luciferase activity was significantly higher in TCF4-overexpressing DPCs than in the empty vector-transfected control cells, suggestive of β-catenin/TCF4-enhanced transactivation or Wnt signaling activity. MAD2B, but not MAD2, inhibited the β-catenin/TCF4-induced upregulation of Wnt signaling activity. MAD2 appeared to have no effect on Wnt signaling activity regardless of the presence or absence of TCF4, suggesting that MAD2 is not involved in Wnt signaling. On the other hand, knockdown of MAD2B upregulated Wnt signaling activity, which was further promoted by TCF4 (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that MAD2B negatively regulates DPC proliferation and hair follicle development via the β-catenin/TCF4-mediated Wnt signaling pathway.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effect of MAD2B on TCF4-mediated transactivation. (A) MAD2B suppresses TCF4-mediated transactivation through inhibiting TCF4 binding to DNA. DPCs were transfected with the vectors, as indicated. TOP-FLASH or FOP-FLASH was co-transfected into DPCs. Relative luciferase activity was determined 48 h after transfection and is shown as the TOP/FOP ratio. pRL-TK was also co-transfected as an internal control. (B) MAD2B knockdown increased TCF4-mediated transactivation. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. **P < 0.01 vs. control; n = 3. DPCs, dermal papilla cells; TCF4, T cell factor 4.

Discussion

TCF4 is an important member of the LEF/TCF family. It has been reported that disruption of either TCF4 or β-catenin disrupts the Wnt signaling pathway, resulting in a complete loss of cell proliferation28. Our previous study has demonstrated that TCF4 is highly expressed in anagen hair follicles and cultured low-passage DPCs which are characterized by an aggregative growth pattern15,19, suggesting the important role of TCF4-β/catenin complex-mediated Wnt signaling in hair follicle morphogenesis. However, it remains largely unknown how TCF4/β-catenin transactivation is regulated during hair follicle induction and growth. In this study, MAD2B was found to suppress TCF4-mediated transcriptional activity in DPCs (Fig. 5). Overexpression of MAD2B inhibited the production and secretion of cytokines by DPCs (Fig. 3). Thus, MAD2B was identified as a negative regulatory partner of TCF4. However, knockdown of MAD2B did not affect the secretory functions of TCF4-induced DPCs (Fig. 3), but further promoted TGF4-induced DPC proliferation (Fig. 2). A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that the effect of MAD2B knockdown on cytokine production in DPCs may be counteracted by other factors.

MAD2B was initially identified as an inhibitor of the APC-cell division cycle 20 (CDC20) and APC-CDC20 homologue-1 (CDH1) complexation. Through direct interaction with CDC20 or CDH1, MAD2B can prevent the onset of anaphase29. CDC20 and CDH1 are essential regulators of mitotic cell division, leading to extensive inhibition of ubiquitination, necessary for the transition from metaphase to anaphase in the cell cycle. Intriguingly, it has been reported that CDC20 silencing can block Wnt/β-catenin signaling by preventing the negative regulator conductin from ubiquitination/degradation and subsequently increasing conductin/GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation/degradation of β-catenin30. Because MAD2B functions as a negative regulator of both TCF4 and CDC20/CDH1, it is possible that MAD2B plays a key role in the modulation of TCF4/β-catenin-mediated Wnt signaling in DPC growth and HF induction. This speculation is in agreement with the findings of the present study. DPCs are situated at the base of hair follicles, where they induce hair follicle neogenesis and control the cyclical growth of hair follicles7,31. These DPC properties have been exploited to develop therapeutic strategies for alopecia, including medical treatment and the surgical implantation of cultured DPCs32,33. It has been previously demonstrated that in vitro cultured DPCs exhibit aggregative behavior that is associated with their hair-inductive ability7. However, this growth pattern disappears gradually with increasing passage number. Due to the reduced mRNA and protein levels of TCF4 in high-passage DPCs15,19, a correlation between TCF4 expression and DPC aggregation behavior appears likely. In the present study, we first demonstrated that MAD2B can suppress the aggregative growth of DPCs in vitro (Fig. 1), which indicates that TCF4 and MAD2B have opposite effects on the aggregative behavior of DPCs, and gives us a clue that MAD2B may interact with TCF4 in DPCs to regulate DPC growth and hair follicle development. Many lines of evidence show that the aggregation growth of DPC is associated with versican, an extracellular matrix proteoglycan. Feng et al. reported that both mRNA and protein levels of versican decline along with a decrease in aggregative growth of high-passage DPCs, and RNA interference targeting versican suppressed DPC aggregation34. Furthermore, versican is found to be specifically expressed in DPCs during hair anagen, but downregulated during catagen and absent during telogen35. In addition, in vascular smooth muscle cells, TCF4-β/catenin complex can bind to the TCF binding sites in the promoter region of the versican gene, and versican transcription can thus be activated by the TCF4/β-catenin complex-mediated Wnt signaling pathway36. Further studies are required to determine whether MAD2B is involved in versican regulation.

It is well established that cytokines such as HGF, IGF-1, and VEGF promote hair growth37–39. HGF was first identified as a stimulator of epithelial cell dissociation and has been reported to activate hair follicle morphogenesis during the anagen phase39,40. IGF-1, a structural homolog of insulin, exerts insulin-like effects on glucose metabolism and plays a positive role in regulating hair follicle development41. The angiogenic growth factor VEGF promotes hair growth by inducing perifollicular angiogenesis during the anagen phase42. Consistent with these findings, the mRNA and protein levels and the secretion of these cytokines increase in response to TCF4 induction. These effects were diminished by overexpression of MAD2B (Fig. 3), suggesting a negative effect of MAD2B on the production and secretion of cytokines by DPCs.

In summary, the presented findings indicate that MAD2B suppresses the aggregation behavior of DPCs and inhibits TCF4-induced DPC proliferation and cytokine production by interacting with TCF4 and subsequently downregulating the TCF4-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Thus, targeting MAD2B is a potential therapeutic strategy against alopecia.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and transfection

This study was approved by The Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Full-thickness scalp skin samples were obtained from hospitalized male patients (aged 18‒35 years) undergoing plastic surgery. All patients provided written informed consent before sample collection. Primary culture of DPCs was performed as previously described19. DPCs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/L), and streptomycin (100 U/L) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Construction of plasmid and adenoviral vectors

Total RNA was extracted from human DPCs using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The full length cDNA of MAD2B, MAD2, and TCF4 was synthesized with a reverse transcription kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) using the following primers (Sangon, Shanghai, China): 5′-GGC CCA CTC CTC CCG GTA GC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCG GGC GAT CCA CAC ACA GA-3′ (reverse) for MAD2B; 5′-CGC GTG CTT TTG TTT GTG TC-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATT TTC CTC ATG TCA TCC TCA GTC A-3′ (reverse) for MAD2; and 5′-TGG GGG TGA TTT TTT TTG GCT TT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGG TTC ACG ACG CTA AAG CTA TTC T-3′ (reverse) for TCF4. Each cDNA was then cloned into a pIRES2 expression vector.

To generate an adenoviral vector expressing TCF4 (pAdTrack-CMV-TCF4), pIRES2-TCF4 was digested with Hind III and Xba I (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), followed by ligation into pAdTrack-CMV (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) using T4 DNA ligase (Toyobo). The resulting vector was transformed into DH10B competent cells (Takara, Dalian, Liaoning, China) and plasmid DNA was prepared using an E. Z. N. A. plasmid mini kit (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA), followed by recombination into the AdEasy adenoviral vector system (Addgene). The recombinants were transfected into 293 T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) for adenoviral packaging. The supernatant was collected for the preparation of adenoviral particles. pAdeno-MCMV-MAD2B expressing MAD2B was prepared by Genemine Biotechnology, Chongqing, China.

Transduction and transfection

After DPCs were grown overnight to form a confluent monolayer, pAdTrack-CMV-TCF4 and pAdeno-MCMV-MAD2B were transduced into DPCs, individually or in combination, at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50. plRES2-TCF4, plRES2-MAD2, and siMAD2B, a vector expressing short hairpin RNA against MAD2B that was constructed previously22, were transfected, individually or in combination, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The empty vector was used as a negative control.

Evaluation of cell morphology and aggregation behavior

DPCs were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well and incubated overnight. Cells were then transduced with pAdeno-MCMV-MAD2B or the empty vector and cell morphology was observed at 0, 12, 24, and 48 h under a light microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) at 100 × magnification. The morphology and aggregation behavior of DPCs were imaged using an Olympus IX71 camera (Olympus).

Cell proliferation assay

DPCs were plated into 24-well plates and grown overnight to form a confluent monolayer. Cells were then transduced with adenoviral vectors expressing TCF4 and MAD2B, individually or in combination, and siMAD2B was co-transfected with the TCF4-expressing vector. After 48 h of incubation, the transfected cells were harvested and plated in a 96-well plate at a density of 2 × 103 cells per well. After cell attachment, 10 µL of Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) solution (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Kumamoto, Japan) was added into each well, followed by dark incubation for 1.5 h. The absorbance [optical density (OD)] was determined at a test wavelength of 450 nm against a reference wavelength of 620 nm using a Varioskan Flash microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The cell viability (%) was calculated as (1 − ODtreated/ODcontrol) × 100%.

Western blot analysis

DPCs were plated in 25-cm2 dishes at a density of 1 × 106 cells per dish. The following day, cells were transfected with TCF4- and MAD2B-expressing vectors and siMAD2B, individually or in combination. After 48 h of incubation, cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline, followed by cell lysis using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Cell lysates were collected and the protein concentration was measured using bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, proteins (20 μg) were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were subsequently blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20, and then incubated with a primary antibody against β-actin, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 1–2 h at room temperature. This was followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. After that, signals were detected using enhanced chemiluminescent substrates (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were acquired and quantified using a Bio2 Rad imaging system (Bio-Rad).

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay

Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (Beyotime) and the lysates were incubated with immunoglobulin G (IgG; negative control) or a monoclonal antibody against MAD2B or TCF4 (R&D Systems) using a Co-IP kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The immunoprecipitates were eluted and subjected to Western blot analysis, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Luciferase reporter assay

DPCs were seeded in a 24-well plate at a density of 0.5 × 105 cells per well and grown overnight. Cells were co-transfected with plRES2-TCF4, plRES2-MAD2B, and plRES2-MAD2, individually or in combination, and TOP-FLASH plasmid containing three TCF-binding sites or FOP-FLASH plasmid containing three mutated TCF-binding sites. Renilla luciferase plasmid (pRL-TK) was used as an internal control for normalization. After 48 h of incubation, cell lysates were prepared using luciferase lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The luciferase activity was measured using a Varioskan Flash microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reporter activity is presented as the TOP-FLASH/FOP-FLASH ratio.

Detection of intracellular and extracellular growth factors

DPCs were transfected with TCF4- and MAD2B-expressing adenoviral vectors and siMAD2B, individually or in combination. After 24 h of transfection, the culture medium was collected and total RNA was extracted from the cells using Trizol, followed by reverse transcription for cDNA synthesis. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) was performed with the following primers: 5′-CAG CAG TCT TCC AAC CCA AT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CAC GAA CTG AAG AGC ATC CA-3′ (reverse) for IGF-1; 5′-CAG AGG GAC AAA GGA AAA GAA G-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATG CTA TTG AAG GGG AAC CAG-3′ (reverse) for HGF; and 5′-GTC CAA CTT CTG GGC TGT CT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCC TCT CCT CTT CCT TCT CTT C-3′ (reverse) for VEGF. The concentrations of IGF-I, HGF, and VEGF in the culture medium were determined with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance (OD) was measured at 450 nm using a Varioskan Flash microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 10.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271771 and No. 81573070).

Author Contributions

Xichuan Yang and Nanlan Yu conceived and designed the experiments; Nanlan Yu performed the experiments; Kezhou Zhang analyzed the data; Zhiqiang Song contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Nanlan Yu and Zhiqiang Song wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Nanlan Yu and Zhiqiang Song contributed equally to this work.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24989-6.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

5/25/2018

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

References

  • 1.Miao Y, Sun YB, Liu BC, Jiang JD, Hu ZQ. Controllable Production of Transplantable Adult Human High-Passage Dermal Papilla Spheroids Using 3D Matrigel Culture. Tissue Eng Pt A. 2014;20:2329–2338. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hunt N, McHale S. The psychological impact of alopecia. BMJ. 2005;331:951–953. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7522.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yang CC, Cotsarelis G. Review of hair follicle dermal cells. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;57:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muller-Rover S, et al. A comprehensive guide for the accurate classification of murine hair follicles in distinct hair cycle stages. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:3–15. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schmidt-Ullrich R, Paus R. Molecular principles of hair follicle induction and morphogenesis. Bioessays. 2005;27:247–261. doi: 10.1002/bies.20184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Driskell RR, Clavel C, Rendl M, Watt FM. Hair follicle dermal papilla cells at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:1179–1182. doi: 10.1242/jcs.082446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jahoda CA, Horne KA, Oliver RF. Induction of hair growth by implantation of cultured dermal papilla cells. Nature. 1984;311:560–562. doi: 10.1038/311560a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Millar SE. Molecular mechanisms regulating hair follicle development. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:216–225. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee J, Tumbar T. Hairy tale of signaling in hair follicle development and cycling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012;23:906–916. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rishikaysh P, et al. Signaling involved in hair follicle morphogenesis and development. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:1647–1670. doi: 10.3390/ijms15011647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huelsken J, Vogel R, Erdmann B, Cotsarelis G, Birchmeier W. beta-Catenin controls hair follicle morphogenesis and stem cell differentiation in the skin. Cell. 2001;105:533–545. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00336-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alonso L, Fuchs E. Stem cells in the skin: waste not, Wnt not. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1189–1200. doi: 10.1101/gad.1086903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Millar SE, et al. WNT signaling in the control of hair growth and structure. Dev Biol. 1999;207:133–149. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149:1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang XC, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes in anagen dermal papilla by suppression subtractive hybridization. Chin Med J (Engl) 2004;117:371–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Omer CA, Miller PJ, Diehl RE, Kral AM. Identification of Tcf4 residues involved in high-affinity beta-catenin binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:584–590. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jahoda CA, Reynolds AJ, Oliver RF. Induction of hair growth in ear wounds by cultured dermal papilla cells. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;101:584–590. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12366039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Osada A, Iwabuchi T, Kishimoto J, Hamazaki TS, Okochi H. Long-term culture of mouse vibrissal dermal papilla cells and de novo hair follicle induction. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:975–982. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.0304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xiong Y, Liu Y, Song Z, Hao F, Yang X. Identification of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in dermal papilla cells of human scalp hair follicles: TCF4 regulates the proliferation and secretory activity of dermal papilla cell. J Dermatol. 2014;41:84–91. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cahill DP, et al. Characterization of MAD2B and other mitotic spindle checkpoint genes. Genomics. 1999;58:181–187. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pfleger CM, Salic A, Lee E, Kirschner MW. Inhibition of Cdh1-APC by the MAD2-related protein MAD2L2: a novel mechanism for regulating Cdh1. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1759–1764. doi: 10.1101/gad.897901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hong CF, Chou YT, Lin YS, Wu CW. MAD2B, a novel TCF4-binding protein, modulates TCF4-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:19613–19622. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.005017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Young TH, et al. The enhancement of dermal papilla cell aggregation by extracellular matrix proteins through effects on cell-substratum adhesivity and cell motility. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5031–5040. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yen CM, Chan CC, Lin SJ. High-throughput reconstitution of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in folliculoid microtissues by biomaterial-facilitated self-assembly of dissociated heterotypic adult cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4341–4352. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kang BM, Kwack MH, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. Sphere formation increases the ability of cultured human dermal papilla cells to induce hair follicles from mouse epidermal cells in a reconstitution assay. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:237–239. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Havlickova B, et al. A human folliculoid microsphere assay for exploring epithelial- mesenchymal interactions in the human hair follicle. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:972–983. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen J, Fang G. MAD2B is an inhibitor of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1765–1770. doi: 10.1101/gad.898701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Korinek V, et al. Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking Tcf-4. Nat Genet. 1998;19:379–383. doi: 10.1038/1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen J, Fang GW. MAD2B is an inhibitor of the anaphase-promoting complex. Gene Dev. 2001;15:1765–1770. doi: 10.1101/gad.898701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hadjihannas MV, Bernkopf DB, Bruckner M, Behrens J. Cell cycle control of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling by conductin/axin2 through CDC20. Embo Rep. 2012;13:347–354. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Matsuzaki T, Yoshizato K. Role of hair papilla cells on induction and regeneration processes of hair follicles. Wound Repair Regen. 1998;6:524–530. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1998.60605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.M’ikanatha NM, et al. Use of the Internet to enhance infectious disease surveillance and outbreak investigation. Biosecur Bioterror. 2006;4:293–300. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reynolds AJ, Jahoda CA. Cultured dermal papilla cells induce follicle formation and hair growth by transdifferentiation of an adult epidermis. Development. 1992;115:587–593. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.2.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Feng M, Yang G, Wu J. Versican targeting by RNA interference suppresses aggregative growth of dermal papilla cells. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011;36:77–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03917.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Soma T, Tajima M, Kishimoto J. Hair cycle-specific expression of versican in human hair follicles. J Dermatol Sci. 2005;39:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rahmani M, et al. Regulation of the versican promoter by the beta-catenin-T-cell factor complex in vascular smooth muscle cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280:13019–13028. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411766200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.R. T. Growth factors and hair growth. Korean Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1997;4:103–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ozeki, M. & Tabata, Y. Promoted growth of murine hair follicles through controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor. Biomaterials23, 2367–2373, doi:Pii S0142-9612(01)00372-6 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Lindner G, et al. Involvement of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and Met receptor signaling in hair follicle morphogenesis and cycling. Faseb J. 2000;14:319–332. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.14.2.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sato C, Tsuboi R, Shi CM, Rubin JS, Ogawa H. Comparative study of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and keratinocyte growth factor effects on human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;104:958–963. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12606221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stenn KS, et al. Hair follicle growth controls. Dermatol Clin. 1996;14:543–558. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70383-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mecklenburg L, et al. Active hair growth (Anagen) is associated with angiogenesis. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;114:909–916. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00954.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES