Abstract
The Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation factor-2 (MD-2) complex is essential for LPS recognition and induces innate immune responses against Gram-negative bacteria. As activation of TLR4/MD-2 is also critical for the induction of adaptive immune responses, TLR4/MD-2 agonists have been developed as vaccine adjuvants, but their efficacy has not yet been ascertained. Here, we demonstrate that a funiculosin (FNC) variant, FNC-RED, and FNC-RED and FNC derivatives are agonists for both murine and human TLR4/MD-2. FNC-RED induced nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation via murine TLR4/MD-2, whereas FNC had no TLR4/MD-2 stimulatory activity. Biacore analysis revealed that FNC-RED binds to murine TLR4/MD-2 but not murine radioprotective 105 (RP105)/myeloid differentiation factor-1 (MD-1), another LPS sensor. FNC-RED induced CD14-independent expressions of pro-inflammatory cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules in murine macrophages and dendritic cells. In contrast, FNC-RED stimulation was reduced in CD14-dependent LPS responses, including dimerization and internalization of TLR4/MD-2 and IFN-β expression. FNC-RED-induced IL-12p40 production from murine dendritic cells was dependent on NF-κB but not MAPK pathway. In addition, fetal bovine serum augmented lipid A-induced NF-κB activation but blocked FNC-RED-mediated responses. Two synthetic phosphate group-containing FNC-RED and FNC derivatives, FNC-RED-P01 and FNC-P01, respectively, activated human TLR4/MD-2, unlike FNC-RED. Finally, computational analysis revealed that this species-specific activation by FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 resulted from differences in electrostatic surface potentials between murine and human TLR4/MD-2. We conclude that FNC-RED and its synthetic derivative represent a novel category of murine and human TLR4/MD-2 agonist.
Keywords: dendritic cell, innate immunity, macrophage, NF-κB (NF-KB), toll-like receptor (TLR), TLR4/MD-2, adjuvant
Introduction
The innate immune system quickly recognizes and responds to microbial products to provide a first line of defense against pathogens. Mediators of these innate responses include Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 family proteins that recognize many pathogen products, and they are characterized by extracellular leucine-rich repeat motifs and intracellular Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domains (1). TLR4 was the first TLR to be identified, and its extracellular domain forms a heterodimeric complex with myeloid differentiation factor-2 (MD-2) (2). Neither Tlr4−/− nor Ly96−/− (MD-2−/−) mice respond to LPS (3, 4), so both members of the TLR4/MD-2 complex are essential for LPS responses. Crystal structure analysis revealed that MD-2 has a large hydrophobic cavity that could accommodate lipid A, a bioactive moiety of LPS (5). LPS binding to MD-2 induces homodimerization of a 1:1 TLR4/MD-2 complex, in a tail-to-tail orientation with two TLR4 molecules (6). Formation of the LPS-TLR4/MD-2 complexes then causes the recruitment of intracellular adaptor proteins, TIR domain-containing adaptor protein, and myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) (7). MyD88 leads to early activation of MAPKs and the transcriptional factor nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) to induce inflammatory cytokine genes such as IL-6 and TNF-α (1). TLR4 signals via another adaptor protein TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-β (TRIF) to NF-κB and interferon regulatory factor (IRF)1 and IRF3 transcriptional factors (8).
Upon ligand recognition, TLRs not only initiate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but they also activate antigen-presenting cells (APC) to modulate adaptive immune responses against pathogens (8). Therefore, TLR agonists have been the focus of attempts to develop new-generation vaccines. Many preclinical and clinical studies have used purified TLR agonists to enhance adaptive immune responses during vaccination (9). Among these agonists, monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), an artificially detoxified derivative of lipid A, is one of the most used adjuvants in human licensed vaccines (10). Previous studies revealed that MPL is much weaker than lipid A in inducing TLR4/MD-2 dimerization and MyD88-dependent immune responses (11, 12). Nonetheless, MPL can induce stronger T-helper cell type 1 responses than classical adjuvants such as aluminum salt precipitates (13). This ability is due to a signaling bias toward the TRIF pathway, resulting in the safe stimulation of adaptive immune responses without excessive production of inflammatory cytokines (14). Based on these characteristics, lipid A analogs represent attractive candidates for adjuvants, and other lipid A mimetics are under development (15–19).
TLRs also recognize endogenous ligands called danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Intriguingly, DAMPs can enhance adjuvanticity when co-immunized with inactivated vaccines or synergize with exogenous TLR ligands to induce efficient cellular immune responses (20, 21). Additionally, a chemical compound with no structural similarity to lipid A engages the TLR4/MD-2 complex and triggers pro-inflammatory responses (22). These facts suggest that non-lipid A ligands of natural origin may activate TLR4/MD-2.
We have now screened synthetic and natural products to discover new non-endotoxin-derived TLR4/MD-2 agonists. Stimulatory activity was detected as NF-κB activation in Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 by flow cytometry. Here, we identify a funiculosin (FNC) variant, FNC-RED, as a novel ligand for murine TLR4/MD-2 through this screen. Furthermore, we synthesized derivatives with a phosphate group that activated human TLR4/MD-2. Responses induced by FNC-RED and derivatives were then investigated in vitro on murine and human immune cells to explore structure-function relationships.
Results
Reduced compound of funiculosin induces NF-κB activation via murine TLR4/MD-2
To identify non-endotoxin-derived TLR4/MD-2 agonists, we prepared Ba/F3 transfectant cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2, murine CD14, and an NF-κB-GFP reporter construct. Using this, we could screen thousands of compounds in a relatively short time and easily detect TLR4/MD-2-induced NF-κB activation by flow cytometry (23). Among 1,320 compounds and natural products from a commercially available compound library and pharmaceutical companies (see “Experimental procedures”) screened for their abilities to activate NF-κB, we identified only one sample, termed TΙK-139, that was as active as lipid A and taxol (supplemental Fig. 1A). TIK-139 was obtained from reduced products of FNC extracted from the soil bacterium Penicillium funiculosum (24, 25). HPLC analysis revealed that at least five compounds were contained in TIK-139 (supplemental Fig. 1B). We fractionated these compounds and tested their abilities in Ba/F3 transfectant cells. Among five fractions, fraction 4 induced the strongest ability to activate NF-κB (supplemental Fig. 1C). The MTS510 mAb specifically recognizes the murine TLR4/MD-2 complex (26). NF-κB activation induced by fraction 4 was completely blocked by this mAb (supplemental Fig. 1D), although it only partially inhibited lipid A- or taxol-induced NF-κB activation (supplemental Fig. 1D).
We then investigated the structure of the active compound contained in fraction 4. The fraction was separated by HPLC, and an acetylated sample was analyzed by high-resolution MS (ESI-QTOF MS) and NMR (supplemental Fig. 2, A–C). With this indirect strategy, the chemical structure was determined (Fig. 1A). Because the active molecule was a reduced compound of FNC, we termed it FNC-RED. It was composed of a hydrophilic region, an acidic hydroxy group, and an alkyl chain, which are structurally and chemically analogous to lipid A (supplemental Fig. 3).
Figure 1.
FNC-RED induces NF-κB activation via murine TLR4/MD-2 in Ba/F3 transfectant cells. A, chemical structure of FNC-RED determined by NMR spectroscopy. B, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 were treated with anti-mouse TLR4/MD-2 mAb (clone MTS510) (20 μg/ml) or isotype control antibody (Ct. Ab) (20 μg/ml) for 1 h and subsequently stimulated with the indicated concentration of FNC-RED for 18 h. The cells were harvested, and GFP expression was monitored by flow cytometry. Dashed lines and open histograms depict those cultured with medium alone and FNC-RED, respectively. Filled histograms depict those cultured with FNC-RED in the presence of anti-mouse TLR4/MD-2 mAb or isotype control antibody. Black and gray values depict mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of GFP expression in cultured cells stimulated with FNC-RED and FNC-RED with indicated Abs, respectively. C, chemical structure of FNC (left). Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 were stimulated with FNC (50 μg/ml) for 18 h. The cells were harvested, and GFP expression was monitored by flow cytometry. Open and filled histograms depict those cultured with medium alone and FNC, respectively (right). Black and gray values depict the MFI of GFP expression in cultured cells stimulated with medium alone and FNC, respectively. D, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 were treated with polymyxin B (1 μg/ml) for 1 h and subsequently stimulated with the indicated concentration of lipid A or FNC-RED for 18 h. The cells were harvested, and GFP expression was monitored by flow cytometry. Filled and open histograms depict those cultured with lipid A or FNC-RED in the presence and absence of polymyxin B, respectively. Dashed lines depict those cultured with medium alone. Black and gray values depict MFI of GFP expression in cultured cells stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED and medium, lipid A, or FNC-RED with polymyxin B, respectively. E, Biacore sensorgrams of FNC-RED or FNC (0, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/ml, from bottom to top) binding to and dissociation from murine TLR4/MD-2 immobilized on the sensor chip are depicted in RU after subtracting the control signal. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
We then synthesized FNC-RED from FNC (see “Experimental procedures”). The NF-κB activation potential of the synthesized FNC-RED was similar to that of fraction 4 in Ba/F3 transfectant cells (Fig. 1B), whereas FNC had no such ability (Fig. 1C). Upon FNC-RED stimulation, the levels of NF-κB-GFP were increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). We confirmed that FNC-RED induced NF-κB activation via TLR4/MD-2 using the MTS510 mAb (Fig. 1B). Polymyxin B has been used to detect and clear LPS contamination (27). Polymyxin B treatment clearly suppressed lipid A-induced NF-κB activation (Fig. 1D). In contrast, FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation was not affected by polymyxin B treatment, suggesting that neither lipid A nor LPS contaminated the FNC-RED preparation.
To examine whether FNC-RED binds to murine TLR4/MD-2, we performed surface plasmon resonance (SPR) using a Biacore instrument. The murine TLR4 protein forms a complex with murine MD-2 in solution (28). Furthermore, in the presence of LPS, this 1:1 TLR4/MD-2 complex forms a dimeric structure of the LPS-binding 2:2 TLR4/MD-2 complex in solution and crystal (28). The binding of FNC-RED or FNC to murine TLR4/MD-2 was detected (Fig. 1E). Although the binding rates and affinities were unable to be determined, we observed differences in SPR sensorgrams between FNC-RED and FNC. The dissociation rate for the binding of FNC-RED to murine TLR4/MD-2 was 0.038 s−1, similar to that of LPS to murine TLR4 or MD-2 alone, as reported previously (29). In contrast, the dissociation rate for the binding of FNC to murine TLR4/MD-2 was 0.961 s−1, 25-fold higher than that of FNC-RED (Fig. 1E). This suggests that FNC binds to TLR4/MD-2, but its binding might be unstable. A TLR4 homologue, radioprotective 105 (RP105), forms a complex with myeloid differentiation factor-1 (MD-1) (30, 31). RP105- or MD-1-deficient B cells were hyporesponsive to LPS (32, 33), suggesting that the RP105/MD-1 complex cooperates with the TLR4/MD-2 complex in LPS responses. The resonance unit (RU) values for the bindings of FNC-RED and FNC to murine RP105/MD-1 were much lower than those for murine TLR4/MD-2 (supplemental Fig. 4). These results clearly demonstrate that FNC-RED is a novel agonist of murine TLR4/MD-2.
To explore a structure-based mechanism for the binding and stimulatory effect of FNC-RED, the radius of gyrations (Rg) of FNC and FNC-RED was calculated by taking into account their conformational change (1,000 conformations) in solution phase. FNC had Rg values of 4.8 Å at the highest frequency (supplemental Fig. 5A). As shown in a representative structure of FNC with this Rg value, the pyran ring contributed to make an intramolecular hydrogen bond with the acidic hydroxy group (supplemental Fig. 5B). In contrast, FNC-RED had Rg values of more than 5.2 Å (supplemental Fig. 5, A and C). Rg values of less than 4.4 Å were also observed in FNC-RED (supplemental Fig. 5, A and D). These findings indicate that lack of the pyran ring leads to the acquisition of mobility. Therefore, the alkyl chain of FNC-RED may have enhanced its accessibility to the hydrophobic cavity of MD-2, as is well known in lipid A whose acyl chains are deeply inserted into the cavity (5, 6).
FNC-RED induces expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines via MyD88 and TRIF pathways in murine macrophages
TLR4 activation induces expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and type 1 IFN (1). Therefore, we examined whether FNC-RED had this activity and required MD-2 for responses in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). A high concentration of FNC (100 μg/ml) decreased cell viability of BMDMs, whereas FNC-RED had no such adverse effect (supplemental Fig. 6). Expression levels of TNF-α mRNA were increased by lipid A, MPL, or FNC-RED stimulation within 4 h in BMDMs from WT mice (Fig. 2A, left), and these responses did not occur with BMDMs from TLR4- or MD-2-deficient mice (Fig. 2B, left). We obtained similar results with IL-12p40 mRNA expression (Fig. 2B, right). Lipid A or MPL stimulation increased expression levels of IFN-β mRNA within 2 h (Fig. 2A, right). However, we found no significant increase in IFN-β mRNA in FNC-RED-stimulated WT BMDMs (Fig. 2A, right).
Figure 2.
FNC-RED induces inflammatory gene expression via TLR4/MD-2 and its adaptor molecules in mouse macrophages. A, BMDMs from WT mice were stimulated with lipid A (1 μg/ml), MPL (1 μg/ml), or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml) for the indicated time periods. Total RNA was extracted, and expression levels of TNF-α and IFN-β were measured by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D. N.S., not significant. *, p < 0.05; §, p < 0.001 versus 0 h. B, BMDMs from WT, Tlr4−/−, or Ly96−/− mice were stimulated with lipid A (1 μg/ml), MPL (1 μg/ml), or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml) for 2 h. Total RNA was extracted, and expression levels of TNF-α and IL-12p40 were measured by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D. §, p < 0.001 versus WT. C, BMDMs from WT, Myd88−/−, or Ticam1−/− mice were stimulated with lipid A (1 μg/ml), MPL (1 μg/ml), or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml) for 4 h. Total RNA was extracted, and expression levels of TNF-α and IL-12p40 were measured by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D. §, p < 0.001 versus WT. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.
We also evaluated the requirements for MyD88 and TRIF in FNC-RED-induced responses. Lipid A- or MPL-induced TNF-α and IL-12p40 mRNA expressions were impaired in MyD88- or TRIF-deficient (Ticam1−/−) BMDMs compared with those from WT mice (Fig. 2C). Additionally, TRIF-deficient BMDMs showed better TNF-α expression than those lacking MyD88. Thus, FNC-RED activates the TLR4/MD-2 complex on murine macrophages and its treatment increases expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines via MyD88- and TRIF-dependent pathways. However, FNC-RED has no significant stimulatory effect on IFN-β expression.
FNC-RED induces adaptive immune responses in murine dendritic cells
Adaptive immune responses, including CD86 up-regulation and IL-12p40 expression, are key reactions on APCs, such as dendritic cells (34, 35). Therefore, we investigated the activity of FNC-RED on adaptive immune responses. Up-regulation of CD86, a co-stimulatory molecule for T cells, and MHC class II, is induced by TLR4/MD-2 stimulation on the cell surface via the TRIF pathway (11, 36). Lipid A or MPL stimulation induced CD86 and MHC class II up-regulation on murine bone marrow-derived conventional dendritic cells (BM-cDCs) from WT mice (Fig. 3A and supplemental Fig. 7). FNC-RED stimulation also induced up-regulation of CD86 and MHC class II, but high concentrations were required compared with lipid A and MPL. These responses were slightly attenuated in MyD88-deficient BM-cDCs (Fig. 3A and supplemental Fig. 7). In contrast, TRIF-deficient BM-cDCs were greatly impaired in these responses induced by not only lipid A or MPL but also FNC-RED stimulation (Fig. 3A and supplemental Fig. 7). Additionally, FNC-RED as well as MPL increased expression levels of IL-12p40 and TNF-α mRNA in WT BM-cDCs (Fig. 3B, left and middle). However, expression levels of IFN-β in FNC-RED-stimulated BM-cDCs were modest compared with those stimulated with lipid A or MPL (Fig. 3B, right). Thus, FNC-RED can elicit adaptive immune responses in dendritic cells.
Figure 3.
FNC-RED induces adaptive immune responses in mouse dendritic cells. A, BM-cDCs from WT, Myd88−/−, or Ticam1−/− mice were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of lipid A, MPL, or FNC-RED for 20 h. The cells were harvested, and CD86 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Open and filled histograms depict those stained with isotype-matched antibody or anti-CD86 antibody, respectively. Percentages of CD86-positive cells were depicted in each histogram. B, BM-cDCs from WT mice were stimulated with lipid A (1 μg/ml), MPL (1 μg/ml), or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml) for 2 h. Total RNA was extracted, and expression levels of IL-12p40, TNF-α, and IFN-β were measured by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D. #, p < 0.01; §, p < 0.001 versus medium (Med.). Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.
FNC-RED activates NF-κB but not MAPK pathway
NF-κB and MAPKs are key molecules for TLR4-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (1). We then investigated whether FNC-RED stimulation activates these pathways. An IκB kinase inhibitor BAY11-7082 and a MAPK inhibitor PD98059 significantly inhibited lipid A-induced IL-12p40 production in BM-cDCs from WT mice (Fig. 4A, left). In contrast, FNC-RED-induced IL-12p40 production was suppressed by BAY11-7082 but not PD98059 (Fig. 4A, right), suggesting that MAPKs may not be involved in FNC-RED-stimulated signaling pathways. We confirmed that FNC-RED activates NF-κB pathway by detecting IκBα degradation in WT BMDMs (Fig. 4, B and C). In contrast, FNC-RED stimulation did not induce Erk1/2 phosphorylation (Fig. 4, B and C). Thus, lipid A and FNC-RED stimulations may utilize different signaling pathways to induce pro-inflammatory cytokine production.
Figure 4.
FNC-RED activates NF-κB but not MAPK pathway. A, BM-cDCs from WT mice were treated with the indicated concentration of BAY11-7082 (BAY) or PD98059 (PD). After 30 min, the cells were stimulated with medium alone (Med.), lipid A (10 ng/ml), or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml). After 24 h, culture supernatants were collected, and IL-12p40 production was examined by ELISA. Data are shown as means ± S.D. N.D., not detected. N.S., not significant. *, p < 0.05; #, p < 0.01; §, p < 0.001 versus vehicle (Veh.). B, BMDMs from WT mice were stimulated with lipid A (1 μg/ml) or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml) for the indicated time periods. Expression of IκBα, ERK1/2 and p-Erk1/2 was examined by Western blotting in triplicate. Similar results were obtained in two independent experiments. C, optical density of the bands (B) was quantified by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). Data are presented as means ± S.D. normalized to actin or total ERK1/2 expression. N.S., not significant. *, p < 0.05; #, p < 0.01; §, p < 0.001 versus medium (Med.).
FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation does not require LBP or soluble/membranous CD14
LBP is a soluble protein mainly produced by the liver and augments LPS responses (37, 38). CD14 exists on cell membranes and in serum in membranous and soluble forms, respectively (39). CD14 has a key role in sensitizing cells to LPS by delivering it to the TLR4/MD-2 complex (40). To determine the role of LBP and CD14 for FNC-RED responses, we first examined whether FBS was required for FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation, because FBS contains bovine LBP and the soluble form of bovine CD14. In contrast to lipid A stimulation, low concentrations of FNC-RED (0.1 or 0.5 μg/ml) induced NF-κB activation in the absence but not in the presence of FBS (supplemental Fig. 8A). This NF-κB activation was significantly blocked by MTS510 mAb (supplemental Fig. 8B). Additionally, high concentrations of BSA blocked FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation in the absence of FBS (supplemental Fig. 9). These results indicate that albumin or some factors in FBS block FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation.
We then treated Ba/F3 transfectant cells with a recombinant mouse LBP (rmLBP) or recombinant mouse CD14 (rmCD14) in the absence of FBS. The rmLBP and rmCD14 augmented NF-κB activation induced by lipid A in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). In contrast, these recombinant proteins had no effect on FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation. We also examined whether an anti-mouse CD14 mAb (clone 4C1) blocked FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation in the presence of FBS on Ba/F3 transfectant cells. The CD14 mAb blocked NF-κB activation induced by a low dose of lipid A (0.3 ng/ml) (Fig. 5B). However, this was not seen in the FNC-RED-stimulated cells (Fig. 5B), suggesting that membranous CD14 may be dispensable for FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation. These results suggest that LBP and soluble/membranous CD14 may not be involved in FNC-RED-induced responses.
Figure 5.
FNC-RED-induced TLR4/MD-2 activation does not require LBP and CD14. A, indicated concentrations of rmLBP and rmCD14 were pre-incubated with lipid A or FNC-RED in the absence of FBS for 30 min. Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 were then treated with the recombinant protein/ligand mixtures in the absence of FBS for 18 h. The cells were harvested, and GFP expression was monitored by flow cytometry. Dashed lines depict those cultured with medium alone. Open histograms depict those stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED. Filled histograms depict those stimulated with the recombinant protein/ligand mixtures. Black and gray values depict MFI of GFP expression in cultured cells stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED and medium, lipid A, or FNC-RED with indicated recombinant proteins, respectively. B, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 were treated with anti-mouse CD14 mAb (10 μg/ml) or isotype control antibodies (Ct. IgG2b) (10 μg/ml) for 30 min and subsequently stimulated with the indicated concentration of lipid A or FNC-RED in the presence of FBS (10% v/v) for 18 h. The cells were harvested, and GFP expression was monitored by flow cytometry. Dashed lines depict those cultured with medium alone. Open histograms depict those stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED. Filled histograms depict those stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED in the presence of anti-mouse CD14 mAb or Ct. IgG2b. Black and gray values depict MFI of GFP expression in cultured cells stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED and lipid A or FNC-RED with indicated Abs, respectively. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
FNC-RED stimulation is impaired in the dimerization and internalization of TLR4/MD-2
Membranous CD14 has a key role in the formation of tight dimerization of TLR4/MD-2 to initiate MyD88-dependent pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and the internalization of TLR4/MD-2 toward endosome, where TRIF signaling induces type 1 IFN production (11, 41). To confirm that membranous CD14 is dispensable for FNC-RED-induced responses (Fig. 5B), we studied the formation of TLR4/MD-2 dimerization using Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4-GFP, murine TLR4-FLAG, murine MD-2-FLAG, and murine CD14 (42). After lipid A stimulation, TLR4-FLAG was co-precipitated with TLR4-GFP, suggesting that lipid A-induced TLR4/MD-2 dimerization (Fig. 6A). In contrast, FNC-RED did not have this effect.
Figure 6.
FNC-RED stimulation is impaired in CD14-dependent TLR4/MD-2 activation. A, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4-FLAG, murine TLR4-GFP, murine MD-2-FLAG, and murine CD14 were stimulated with medium alone, LPS (0.03 or 1 μg/ml), or FNC-RED (50 μg/ml) for 60 min. The cultured cells were then subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-GFP and immunoblotting (IB) with anti-FLAG or anti-GFP as described under the “Experimental procedures.” B, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 were stimulated with medium (Med) alone or the indicated concentration of lipid A or FNC-RED in the presence of FBS (10% v/v) for 1 h. The cells were harvested and stained with control antibodies Ct. Ab or anti-mouse TLR4/MD-2 mAb (clone MTS510). Open and filled histograms depict those stained with Ct. Ab and MTS510, respectively. Percentages of TLR4/MD-2-positive cells are depicted in each histogram. C, BM-cDCs from WT mice were stimulated with medium alone or the indicated concentration of lipid A or FNC-RED in the presence of FBS (10% v/v) for 1 or 18 h. The cells were harvested and stained with Ct. Ab or MTS510. Open and filled histograms depict those stained with Ct. Ab and MTS510, respectively. Percentages of TLR4/MD-2-positive cells were depicted in each histogram. D, BM-cDCs from WT and Cd14−/− mice were stimulated with medium alone or indicated concentration of lipid A or FNC-RED in the absence of FBS for 1 or 18 h. The cells were harvested and stained with Ct. Ab or MTS510. Open and filled histograms depict those stained with Ct. Ab and MTS510, respectively. Percentages of TLR4/MD-2-positive cells were depicted in each histogram. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Then we focused on the internalization of TLR4/MD-2. After lipid A stimulation, TLR4/MD-2 rapidly internalized (Fig. 6B), and this response persisted for 18 h in Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 (data not shown). However, FNC-RED had a defect in inducing TLR4/MD-2 internalization even at 18 h of stimulation (Fig. 6B and data not shown). Similar results were obtained when BM-cDCs were stimulated with lipid A or FNC-RED (Fig. 6C). To confirm the importance of membranous CD14 in TLR4/MD-2 internalization, we stimulated CD14-deficient BM-cDCs with lipid A or FNC-RED. To eliminate the effect of soluble bovine CD14, we set up the cultures without FBS. CD14-dependent TLR4/MD-2 internalization was observed when stimulated with lipid A at a longer interval (18 h) (Fig. 6D). In contrast, CD14 dependence was not seen in FNC-RED-stimulated BM-cDCs. This was consistent with the result that the anti-CD14 mAb did not inhibit FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation (Fig. 5B). These results demonstrate that FNC-RED does not induce membranous CD14-dependent TLR4/MD-2 activation, including its tight dimerization and internalization.
Derivatives of FNC-RED and FNC activate human TLR4/MD-2
Our experiments then focused on potential activity for FNC-RED on human TLR4/MD-2. To explore this, we stimulated Ba/F3 cells expressing human TLR4/MD-2 and human CD14 with either lipid A or FNC-RED. Although lipid A stimulation induced NF-κB activation in Ba/F3 transfectant cells, such a response was not observed with FNC-RED even at a high concentration (50 μg/ml) (supplemental Fig. 10).
To increase affinity of FNC-RED with human TLR4/MD-2, we synthesized two derivatives, which have a phosphate group in FNC-RED and FNC, designated FNC-RED-P01 and FNC-P01, respectively (Fig. 7A). FNC-RED-P01 and FNC-P01 showed weak NF-κB activation in Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 (Fig. 7B). Likewise, FNC-RED-P01 and FNC-P01 induced low levels of TNF-α expression in BMDMs compared with FNC-RED (supplemental Fig. 11A, left). However, these derivatives did not induce IFN-β expression in BMDMs (supplemental Fig. 11A, right). Intriguingly, both derivatives acquired potency for NF-κB activation in Ba/F3 transfectant cells expressing human TLR4/MD-2 and human CD14 (Fig. 7B). To examine whether these activities were dependent on human TLR4/MD-2, we stimulated naive Ba/F3 cells expressing NF-κB-GFP reporter construct alone, with them, and with other stimuli. Because naïve Ba/F3 cells express murine TLR2 (data not shown), a TLR2 ligand Pam2CSK4 induced NF-κB activation (supplemental Fig. 11B). In contrast, lipid A, FNC-RED, and the derivatives did not induce this response, suggesting that the derivatives activate NF-κB via human TLR4/MD-2. Because FNC-RED-P01 had a much more potent activity than FNC-P01 (Fig. 7B), the former was utilized in the following experiments. Because polymyxin B treatment suppressed lipid A-induced but not FNC-RED-P01-induced NF-κB activation in Ba/F3 transfectant cells, lipid A or LPS was unlikely to contaminate the FNC-RED-P01 preparation (supplemental Fig. 11C). In contrast to FNC-RED, FNC-RED-P01-induced NF-κB activation was not affected by the addition of FBS (supplemental Fig. 11D).
Figure 7.
Derivative of FNC-RED with a phosphate group activates human TLR4/MD-2. A, chemical structures of FNC-RED-P01 and FNC-P01. B, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14 (mTLR4/mMD-2/mCD14) or human TLR4/MD-2 and human CD14 (hTLR4/hMD-2/hCD14) were stimulated with the indicated concentration of FNC-RED-P01 or FNC-P01 for 18 h. The cells were harvested, and GFP expression was monitored by flow cytometry. Open and filled histograms depict those cultured with medium alone and FNC-RED-P01 or FNC-P01, respectively. Black and gray values depict MFI of GFP expression in cultured cells stimulated with medium alone and FNC-RED-P01 or FNC-P01, respectively. C, THP-1 cells were cultured as described under “Experimental procedures.” Total RNA was extracted, and expression levels of TNF-α, MCP-1, and IFN-β were measured by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as means ± S.D. N.S., not significant. §, p < 0.001 versus medium (Med.). Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.
Next, we examined whether FNC-RED-P01 activated human macrophages. Expression levels of TNF-α and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNA were increased by lipid A stimulation in human THP-1 macrophages (Fig. 7C, left and middle). FNC-RED-P01 stimulation increased expression levels of these genes in THP-1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. These responses did not occur in FNC-RED-stimulated THP-1 cells. As FNC-RED did not induce IFN-β expression in BMDMs (Fig. 2A), FNC-RED-P01 had no stimulatory effect on IFN-β expression in THP-1 cells (Fig. 7C, right). Taken together, FNC-RED-P01 induces innate immune responses via human TLR4/MD-2.
Docking of FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 to murine or human TLR4/MD-2
To elucidate a structure-based mechanism for the species-specific activation of TLR4/MD-2 by FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01, we performed a computational analysis. Because up to four FNC-RED molecules can be accommodated in the hydrophobic cavity of MD-2 (supplemental Fig. 12), we utilized lipid IVa, which has four acyl chains, as a reference for our docking study of FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01. The data suggest that the differences in electrostatic surface potentials between murine and human TLR4/MD-2 may be important for the species-specific discrimination of FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 (supplemental Fig. 13, A–D). Additionally, the binding affinities of FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 for murine or human TLR4/MD-2 were calculated as the gain of free energy (ΔΔG, FNC-RED-human TLR4/MD-2 as reference (ΔΔG = 0 kcal/mol)) (supplemental Fig. 13E). The differences between FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 in the binding affinity for human or murine TLR4/MD-2 were consistent with our findings in their stimulatory effects and the docking models.
Discussion
Recent advances in our understanding of innate immunity now permit a rational approach for designing and selecting compounds with stimulatory properties. In this study, we identified a reduced compound of FNC, termed FNC-RED, as a specific agonist for the murine TLR4/MD-2 complex. In contrast to lipid A-induced TLR4/MD-2 activation (Fig. 8A), FNC-RED induces CD14-independent TNF-α production and CD86 up-regulation but failed to activate CD14-dependent tight dimerization and internalization of TLR4/MD-2 (Fig. 8B). These features reduce excessive innate immune responses, including IFN-β expression, but augment CD86 and MHC class II expression. Although FNC-RED-P01, a derivative of FNC-RED, induced weak NF-κB activation in Ba/F3 expressing murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine CD14, it potently activated human THP-1 macrophages compared with mouse BMDMs. FNC-RED-P01 induced TNF-α and MCP-1 mRNA expression but not IFN-β mRNA expression in THP-1 macrophages. Therefore, our study revealed a novel category of murine and human TLR4 agonists.
Figure 8.
Schematic models of lipid A- or FNC-RED-stimulated TLR4/MD-2 activation. A, lipid A first binds to LBP and is transferred to the TLR4/MD-2 complex via either CD14 (membranous or soluble CD14)-dependent or CD14-independent manner. In CD14-dependent manner, lipid A induces tight dimerization of TLR4/MD-2 at the plasma membrane leading to TNF-α production via MyD88-dependent pathway. Furthermore, membranous CD14 (mCD14) is required for the internalization of TLR4/MD-2 to endosomes, where TRIF induces IFN-β production. In CD14-independent manner, TLR4/MD-2 is weakly dimerized by lipid A stimulation but can initiate MyD88- and TRIF-dependent pathways, leading to TNF-α production and CD86 up-regulation, respectively. B, FNC-RED stimulation induces CD14-independent but not CD14-dependent TLR4/MD-2 activation. Because CD14 or LBP is not involved in FNC-RED-stimulated activation, FNC-RED does not induce tight dimerization and internalization of TLR4/MD-2. Although the dimerization of TLR4/MD-2 is not detected in FNC-RED-stimulated Ba/F3 transfectant cells by immunoprecipitation assay, it may induce weak dimerization of TLR4/MD-2 at the plasma membrane to promote TNF-α production and CD86 up-regulation.
In this study, we utilized Ba/F3 transfectant cells to screen TLR4/MD-2 agonists. Through this cell-based assay, we can easily detect activation of the NF-κB pathway by flow cytometry. Moreover, the screening time is significantly less compared with other assays, including ELISA, Western blotting, etc. This new approach allowed us to identify a rare class of bioactive compounds that activate murine and human TLR4/MD-2.
FNC was first identified as an antibiotic (24, 25) and effects on innate immunity were not suspected. We infer from this study that FNC-RED and its derivatives are novel agonists for TLR4/MD-2. FNC was not developed for clinical use as an antibiotic due to its mitochondrial toxicity by inhibiting cytochrome bc1 complex (43). We found that FNC-RED showed lower cytotoxicity compared with FNC in BMDMs (supplemental Fig. 6). In addition, cytotoxicity of FNC-RED-P01 was not detected at a concentration of 10 μg/ml in THP-1 macrophages (data not shown). These facts suggest that reduction of or addition of a phosphate group to FNC can lower its cytotoxicity.
LBP and CD14 are key accessory molecules that make efficient transfer of LPS to TLR4/MD-2 and increase the sensitivity of LPS detection (44). Recent studies have identified the LPS-binding sites of CD14 and the key charged residues in LBP and CD14 for LPS transfer (45–47). In addition, CD14 mediates LPS-induced endocytosis of TLR4, which induces TRIF-dependent responses in endosomes (41). We found that these molecules are not required for FNC-RED-induced murine TLR4/MD-2 activation. This may also be the case with FNC-RED-P01, because it has no effect on type 1 IFN expression (Fig. 7C). Thus, it is likely that FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 bind to neither LBP nor CD14, whereas these molecules form a high-affinity complex with LPS (44). Intriguingly, Neoseptin-3 also does not require CD14 for its stimulatory effect on TLR4 signaling (22).
Intriguingly, FNC-RED stimulation does not activate MAPK signaling (Fig. 4, A and B). A previous paper reported that sCD14 increased LPS-induced phosphorylation of MAPKs in endothelial cells (48). Furthermore, LPS-induced phosphorylation of MAPKs but not NF-κB in macrophages was dependent on CD14 (49). Therefore, NF-κB and MAPK signaling under TLR4/MD-2 can be dissociable by CD14. As CD14 is not involved in FNC-RED-mediated TLR4/MD-2 activation, this may explain why FNC-RED does not activate MAPKs.
Our data indicate that some factors in serum inhibit FNC-RED-induced murine TLR4/MD-2 activation. It has been reported that LPS binds to various serum proteins, including albumin and hemoglobin (50–52). We found that BSA inhibited FNC-RED-induced NF-κB activation in the serum-free culture (supplemental Fig. 9), indicating that albumin binds to FNC-RED. Notably, the designing of FNC-RED-P01 resolved this problem (supplemental Fig. 11D). This suggests that a hydroxy group in pyridine ring may allow FNC-RED to bind albumin.
There is much evidence for a critical role of TLR4 in the induction of non-infectious chronic inflammation by recognizing DAMPs (53). In addition, it was reported that TLR4 signaling caused influenza infection to be lethal (54), and a synthetic TLR4 antagonist protected this lethality (55). Therefore, our structure-function and computational analyses may be useful for the synthesis of a new TLR4 antagonist that blocks TLR4-associated inflammation. Furthermore, our screening system should be applicable to searches for new TLR4 antagonists.
In conclusion, we have identified novel TLR4/MD-2 agonists, and we dissected mechanisms through which FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 can activate the receptor.
Experimental procedures
Mice
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan) and were used at 8–12 weeks of age. C57BL/6, Tlr4−/− (3), Ly96−/− (4), Myd88−/− (56), Ticam1−/− (36), and Cd14−/− (41) mice were maintained in microisolator cages under specific pathogen-free conditions and maintained in the animal facility of University of Toyama and the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo. The experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Studies Committees at University of Toyama (Approval No. A2016MED-9) and the Institute of Medical Science and the University of Tokyo (Approval No. A13-20), and all experiments were performed according to the guidelines for the care and treatment of experimental animals at University of Toyama and the University of Tokyo.
Reagents
Tested compounds were obtained from ICCB Known Bioactives Library (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan) and kindly provided from pharmaceutical companies. Lipid A from Escherichia coli F583 (Rd mutant), taxol from Taxus brevifolia, and BSA were purchased from Sigma. MPL from Salmonella minnesota R595, Pam2CSK4, polymyxin B, and BAY11-7082 were purchased from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA). PD98059 was purchased from Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). FBS was purchased from GE Healthcare. Recombinant mouse LBP and recombinant mouse CD14 were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). TIK-139 was provided from Teika Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Toyama, Japan). To obtain TIK-139, an extract from P. funiculosum was catalytically reduced in the presence of a palladium-carbon catalyst. Funiculosin was provided from Novartis (Basel, Switzerland) to synthesize FNC-RED.
Cell culture
Ba/F3 cells, an IL-3-dependent murine pro-B cell line, were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 100 mm 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 ng/ml recombinant mouse IL-3 (R&D Systems). Ba/F3 cells expressing murine or human TLR4, MD-2, CD14, and NF-κB-GFP were established by electroporation, as described previously (23). BaF/3 cells expressing TLR4F (the C terminus of TLR4 was tagged with the FLAG epitope), TLR4G (the C terminus of TLR4 was tagged with the GFP epitope), MD-2, and CD14 were described previously (42).
Bone marrow cells were plated at 1 × 106 cells/ml in 24-well plates with FBS (10% v/v) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml recombinant murine GM-CSF (R&D Systems) as described (57). At day 6, loosely adherent cells were collected by gentle pipetting and used as BM-cDCs. For macrophages, bone marrow cells from C57BL/6 mice were plated in 10-cm bacteriological plastic plates with FBS (10% v/v) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml recombinant murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) (R & D Systems). At day 7, adherent cells were harvested and used as BMDMs. All cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
THP-1 was purchased from DS Pharma Biomedical (Osaka, Japan). THP-1 cells were treated with phorbol myristate acetate (500 ng/ml) for 48 h and then washed with PBS twice. The cells were further cultured for 12 h and then stimulated with the indicated concentrations of lipid A, FNC-RED, or FNC-RED-P01 for 4 h.
Antibodies and flow cytometry
Purified anti-mouse CD14 (clone 4C1), purified rat IgG2b, and rat IgG1 were purchased from BD Biosciences. Purified anti-mouse LBP (clone 749405) was purchased from R&D Systems. Purified anti-mouse TLR4/MD-2 (clone MTS510) was purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA).
PE-conjugated anti-mouse TLR4/MD-2 (clone MTS510) was purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). The following antibodies were purchased from BioLegend: PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD86 (clone GL-1) and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse HMC class II (clone M5/114.15.2).
The cells (1 × 105) were incubated with purified anti-mouse FcγR (clone 2.4G2) to block binding of the labeled Abs to FcγR. After 15 min, the cells were stained with predetermined optimal concentrations of the respective Abs. 7-Amino-actinomycin D (BD Biosciences) was used to exclude dead cells. Flow cytometry analyses were conducted on a FACSCanto (BD Biosciences), and the data were analyzed with Flowjo software (Treestar, San Carlos, CA).
Preparation of FNC-RED
To a stirred solution of funiculosin (25.0 mg, 50.9 μmol) in THF (400 μl), water (40 μl), and acetic acid (20 μl) was added palladium(OH)2/carbon (15.0 mg, palladium 20%, wetted with ∼50% water), and the mixture was stirred under H2 (3 MPa) for 6 days at room temperature. After the reaction, palladium catalyst was removed by membrane filtration. The filtrate, after addition of toluene, was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by HPLC to give FNC-RED (12.0 mg, 24.9 μmol). Column was Cosmosil 5C18-AR-300, 10 × 250 mm (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan); mobile phase was as follows: A = H2O and B = CH3CN (B concentration, 0–30 min at 70–100%, 30–55 min at 100%); flow rate was as follows: 3.5 ml/min; detection 220 nm; retention time (FNC-RED) was 27.3 min. A full description of the syntheses of FNC-RED-P01 and FNC-P01 will be published elsewhere.
SPR
Biacore T200, research-grade carboxymethyl dextran chip (CM5), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), N-ethyl-N′-(3-diethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), ethanolamine-HCl, HBS-EP buffer, and BiaEvaluation software were obtained from GE Healthcare. Recombinant murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine RP105/MD-1 were purified as described previously (28, 58). To prepare the SPR assay, the purified proteins were immobilized onto the CM5 sensor chip by amine coupling. The surface was activated with NHS and EDC, and the purified proteins were injected at a concentration of 50 μg/ml in 10 mm sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0). The values of murine TLR4/MD-2 and murine RP105/MD-1 immobilized onto the sensor chip were 13,251.4 and 13,932.4 RU, respectively, and these values were stable during the experiments. Remaining activated groups were then blocked with 1 m ethanolamine-HCl (pH 8.5). For kinetics experiments, the various concentrations of FNC-RED or FNC were injected. After 120 s, the dissociation phase was monitored for 180 s. Regeneration step was not conducted because the bindings were completely abolished during the dissociation phase. All kinetics experiments were performed at 25 °C in HBS-EP containing 5% (v/v) DMSO at a flow rate of 20 μl/min. Binding and dissociation kinetics were evaluated with BiaEvaluation software. Dissociation data were fitted to a 1:1 binding model using non-linear least squares regression.
Preparation of RNA and cDNA
Total RNA was isolated with RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was reverse-transcribed with a TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions.
RT-PCR
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with a TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with a CFX96 TouchTM RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's instructions. Relative transcript abundance was normalized for that of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase mRNA. The information for primers used for RT-PCR is listed in supplemental Table 1.
Western blotting
Cells were washed and lysed for 60 min in iced lysis buffer containing 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mm NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor mixture (Nacalai Tesque), and phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Nacalai Tesque). Lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analysis. The following antibodies for immunoblotting were purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA): anti-IκBα, anti-ERK1/2, anti-p-ERK1/2, and goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase. Anti-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma. Donkey anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase was purchased from Chemicon International Inc. (Temecula, CA). The reactive bands were visualized by ECL Prime or ECL Select (GE Healthcare).
Immunoprecipitation and immunoprobing
To examine homodimerization of TLR4, Ba/F3 cells expressing murine TLR4-FLAG, murine TLR4-GFP, murine MD-2-FLAG, and murine CD14 were incubated with lipid A or FNC-RED. After 60 min, the cells were washed and lysed with lysis buffer consisting of 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mm NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor mixture (Nacalai Tesque). After 30 min of incubation on ice, nuclei were removed by centrifugation. Beads coupled with a rabbit anti-GFP (Invitrogen) were added to cell lysates and rotated for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed with lysis buffer, and bound proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma) or rabbit anti-GFP (MBL, Nagoya, Japan), followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody (Cell Signaling). The reactive bands were visualized by ECL Prime (GE Healthcare).
Cell viability assay
Cell viability assay was conducted by using a Cell Titer 96® Aqueous One Solution cell proliferation assay (Promega, Madison, WI).
Conformational analysis of ligand flexibility
Conformational samplings of FNC and FNC-RED were performed using 100-ns molecular dynamics simulations using program Desmond version 4.7 (59). The OPLS3 force field was used for the simulations. Initial model structures were placed into a TIP3P water molecule solvated with 0.15 m NaCl occupying up to 50 Å from ligand molecules. After minimization and relaxation of model, the production of molecular dynamics phase was performed for 100 ns in the isothermal-isobaric (NPT) ensemble at 300 K and 1 bar using the Langevin dynamics. Long-range electrostatic interactions were computed. After simulation, 1,000 conformations were extracted from trajectory with 0.1-ns interval. Conformational flexibility of ligands was analyzed with the Rg for all conformations calculated by MOE (Chemical Computing Group, Inc., Montreal, Canada).
Computational modeling of ligand-bound model of human and murine TLR4/MD-2
Our approach for docking of FNC-RED and FNC-RED-P01 to the lipid A-binding sites of human and murine TLR4/MD-2 utilized four main steps as follows: (i) molecular modeling of FNC-RED-P01 bound to human TLR4/MD-2 model by docking with the positional and hydrogen-bonding constraints; (ii) molecular modeling of FNC-RED-human TLR4/MD-2, FNC-RED-P01-murine TLR4/MD-2, and FNC-RED-murine TLR4/MD-2 complexes based on the FNC-RED-P01-human TLR4/MD-2 model; (iii) minimization of all models by molecular dynamics simulations; and (iv) estimation of ligand-binding free energy. For a small molecule, ionization and energy minimization were performed by the OPLS3 force field in the LigPrep Script in the Maestro (Schrödinger LLC, New York). These minimized structures were employed as input structures for docking simulations. Initial atomic coordinates of human and murine TLR4/MD-2 were derived from the crystal structures of lipid A-human TLR4/MD-2 complex (PDB code 3fxi) (6) and lipid IVa-murine TLR4/MD-2 complex (PDB code 3vq1) (28), respectively. First, we utilized the computational model of lipid IVa-human TLR4/MD-2 complex for docking of FNC-RED-P01 because the lipid IVa scaffold is more suitable for reference position of the docking of FNC-RED-P01 than lipid A. To incorporate the lipid IVa onto human TLR4/MD-2, the lipid IVa-murine MD-2 complex was superposed to human MD-2. The human TLR4/MD-2 structure with lipid IVa was refined for docking simulations using the Protein Preparation (60) Wizard Script within Maestro. Docking simulations were performed using the Glide (61, 62) SP docking program (Schrödinger LLC) with hydrogen bonding constraints and positional restraint to acyl chains of lipid IVa. Hydrogen bonding constraints among the side chain charged groups of Lys-341, Lys-362 of human TLR4, Lys-388 of human TLR4*, and Lys-122 of human MD-2 were introduced because these charged residues are not conserved in the murine TLR4/MD-2 sequences. Up to 100 docking poses of FNC-RED-P01 were generated in a grid box defined by each acyl chain position (R2, R3, R2′, and R3′) of lipid IVa. In this work, docking of FNC-RED-P01 based on R2′ acyl chain position of lipid IVa was omitted from candidates due to the lack of probable poses. After the docking simulations were completed, three representative poses of FNC-RED-P01 from R2, R3, and R3′ position on the lipid A-binding site were selected by docking score and manual inspection using Maestro. Molecular modeling of FNC-RED-P01 murine TLR4/MD-2 was modeled from FNC-RED-P01 human TLR4/MD-2 model by superposition of the murine TLR4/MD-2 structure. FNC-RED-bound models for human and murine TLR4/MD-2 were generated from each FNC-RED-P01-bound model by the deletion of the phosphate group of FNC-RED-P01. All initial complex models were subjected to 1-ns molecular dynamics-based energy minimization using program Desmond version 4.7 (59), giving rise to the final three-dimensional model. The OPLS3 force field was used for the simulations. Initial model structures were placed into a TIP3P water molecules solvated with 0.15 m NaCl occupying up to 10 Å from protein molecules. After minimization and relaxation of model, the production of molecular dynamics phase was performed for 1 ns in the isothermal-isobaric (NPT) ensemble at 300 K and 1 bar using the Langevin dynamics. Long-range electrostatic interactions were computed. Finally, ligand-binding free energy of the minimized models was calculated using the MM-GBSA (Schrödinger LLC).
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance followed by post-hoc Tukey test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significance.
Author contributions
Y. N. conceived and designed the experiments. N. O. conducted the experiments, collected data, and analyzed data. H. H. and Y. W. conducted the experiments. K. Mizote, A. S., Y. F., and K. F. contributed the NMR and Mass analysis, and the synthesis of FNC-RED, FNC-RED-P01, and FNC-P01. R. F., N. T., Y. M., and K. Miyake contributed to establish the Ba/F3 transfectant cells, and provided Ly96−/− mice and Cd14−/− mice. S. A-T. contributed to establish the Ba/F3 transfectant cells. T. Y-M., U. O., and T. S. contributed to the Biacore analysis. T. Kato, S. F., and T. Kimura contributed to screen TIK-139. T. H. contributed the computational analysis. Y. N. and N. O. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. K. T. was involved in project planning and supervision. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank all members of our laboratories at the University of Toyama and Toyama Prefectural Institute for Pharmaceutical Research for helpful discussions. We are grateful to Dr. Shizuo Akira (IFRec, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) for providing us Tlr4−/−, Myd88−/−, and Ticam1−/− mice. We thank Novartis for providing us funiculosin. We also thank Dr. Paul W. Kincade (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK) for critical review of the manuscript. We sincerely thank Toyama Prefecture for supporting our laboratory.
This work was supported by Hokuriku Life Science Cluster, MEXT Regional Innovation Strategy Support Program (to K. T.); Hokuriku Innovation Cluster for Health Science, MEXT Regional Innovation Cluster Program, Toyama/Ishikawa Region (to K. T.); Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JSPS KAKENHI JP16K19596 (to N. O.), JP16K19532 (to Y. W.), and JP15K07960 (to H. H.); NEXT Program (LR025 to Y. F.); and JST, PRESTO (JPMJPR13M1 to Y.N.). This work supported in part by the Platform Project for Supporting in Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (to T. H.). Our laboratory (Dept. of Immunobiology and Pharmacological Genetics, University of Toyama) has Grant/Research support from Teika Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. N. O., T. Kato, S. F., and T. Kimura are employees of Teika Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
This article contains supplemental Figs. S1–S13 and Table S1.
- TLR
- toll-like receptor
- APC
- antigen-presenting cell
- BM-cDC
- bone marrow-derived conventional dendritic cell
- BMDM
- bone marrow-derived macrophage
- DAMP
- damage-associated molecular pattern
- EDC
- N-ethyl-N′-(3-diethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide
- FNC
- funiculosin
- FNC-RED
- reduced compound of FNC
- LBP
- LPS-binding protein
- MPL
- monophosphoryl lipid A
- NF-κB
- nuclear factor-κB
- NHS
- N-hydroxysuccinimide
- qRT-PCR
- quantitative RT-PCR
- rmLBP
- recombinant mouse LBP
- RU
- resonance unit
- SPR
- surface plasmon resonance
- TIR
- Toll/IL-1 receptor
- TRIF
- TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-β
- PDB
- Protein Data Bank
- Ct. Ab
- control antibody
- MFI
- mean fluorescence intensity
- PE
- phycoerythrin
- Ab
- antibody.
References
- 1. Kawai T., and Akira S. (2010) The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 11, 373–384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shimazu R., Akashi S., Ogata H., Nagai Y., Fukudome K., Miyake K., and Kimoto M. (1999) MD-2, a molecule that confers lipopolysaccharide responsiveness on Toll-like receptor 4. J. Exp. Med. 189, 1777–1782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hoshino K., Takeuchi O., Kawai T., Sanjo H., Ogawa T., Takeda Y., Takeda K., and Akira S. (1999) Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene product. J. Immunol. 162, 3749–3752 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nagai Y., Akashi S., Nagafuku M., Ogata M., Iwakura Y., Akira S., Kitamura T., Kosugi A., Kimoto M., and Miyake K. (2002) Essential role of MD-2 in LPS responsiveness and TLR4 distribution. Nat. Immunol. 3, 667–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ohto U., Fukase K., Miyake K., and Satow Y. (2007) Crystal structures of human MD-2 and its complex with antiendotoxic lipid IVa. Science 316, 1632–1634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Park B. S., Song D. H., Kim H. M., Choi B. S., Lee H., and Lee J. O. (2009) The structural basis of lipopolysaccharide recognition by the TLR4/MD-2 complex. Nature 458, 1191–1195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kagan J. C., and Medzhitov R. (2006) Phosphoinositide-mediated adaptor recruitment controls Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell 125, 943–955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Medzhitov R. (2007) Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 449, 819–826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Duthie M. S., Windish H. P., Fox C. B., and Reed S. G. (2011) Use of defined TLR ligands as adjuvants within human vaccines. Immunol. Rev. 239, 178–196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Baldridge J. R., McGowan P., Evans J. T., Cluff C., Mossman S., Johnson D., and Persing D. (2004) Taking a Toll on human disease: Toll-like receptor 4 agonists as vaccine adjuvants and monotherapeutic agents. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 4, 1129–1138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tanimura N., Saitoh S., Ohto U., Akashi-Takamura S., Fujimoto Y., Fukase K., Shimizu T., and Miyake K. (2014) The attenuated inflammation of MPL is due to the lack of CD14-dependent tight dimerization of the TLR4/MD2 complex at the plasma membrane. Int. Immunol. 26, 307–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Casella C. R., and Mitchell T. C. (2013) Inefficient TLR4/MD-2 heterotetramerization by monophosphoryl lipid A. PLoS ONE 8, e62622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Vernacchio L., Bernstein H., Pelton S., Allen C., MacDonald K., Dunn J., Duncan D. D., Tsao G., LaPosta V., Eldridge J., Laussucq S., Ambrosino D. M., and Molrine D. C. (2002) Effect of monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) on T-helper cells when administered as an adjuvant with pneumocococcal-CRM197 conjugate vaccine in healthy toddlers. Vaccine 20, 3658–3667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mata-Haro V., Cekic C., Martin M., Chilton P. M., Casella C. R., and Mitchell T. C. (2007) The vaccine adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A as a TRIF-biased agonist of TLR4. Science 316, 1628–1632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bohannon J. K., Hernandez A., Enkhbaatar P., Adams W. L., and Sherwood E. R. (2013) The immunobiology of Toll-like receptor 4 agonists: from endotoxin tolerance to immunoadjuvants. Shock 40, 451–462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bowen W. S., Minns L. A., Johnson D. A., Mitchell T. C., Hutton M. M., and Evans J. T. (2012) Selective TRIF-dependent signaling by a synthetic toll-like receptor 4 agonist. Sci. Signal. 5, ra13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Baldridge J. R., Cluff C. W., Evans J. T., Lacy M. J., Stephens J. R., Brookshire V. G., Wang R., Ward J. R., Yorgensen Y. M., Persing D. H., and Johnson D. A. (2002) Immunostimulatory activity of aminoalkyl glucosaminide 4-phosphates (AGPs): induction of protective innate immune responses by RC-524 and RC-529. J. Endotoxin. Res. 8, 453–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Airhart C. L., Rohde H. N., Bohach G. A., Hovde C. J., Deobald C. F., Lee S. S., and Minnich S. A. (2008) Induction of innate immunity by lipid A mimetics increases survival from pneumonic plague. Microbiology 154, 2131–2138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lembo A., Pelletier M., Iyer R., Timko M., Dudda J. C., West T. E., Wilson C. B., Hajjar A. M., and Skerrett S. J. (2008) Administration of a synthetic TLR4 agonist protects mice from pneumonic tularemia. J. Immunol. 180, 7574–7581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wu M., Wang H., Shi J., Sun J., Duan Z., Li Y., Li J., Hu N., Wei Y., Chen Y., and Hu Y. (2014) Gene expression profiles identify both MyD88-independent and MyD88-dependent pathways involved in the maturation of dendritic cells mediated by heparan sulfate: a novel adjuvant. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 10, 3711–3721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Julier Z., de Titta A., Grimm A. J., Simeoni E., Swartz M. A., and Hubbell J. A. (2016) Fibronectin EDA and CpG synergize to enhance antigen-specific Th1 and cytotoxic responses. Vaccine 34, 2453–2459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wang Y., Su L., Morin M. D., Jones B. T., Whitby L. R., Surakattula M. M., Huang H., Shi H., Choi J. H., Wang K. W., Moresco E. M., Berger M., Zhan X., Zhang H., Boger D. L., and Beutler B. (2016) TLR4/MD-2 activation by a synthetic agonist with no similarity to LPS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E884–E893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Honda H., Nagai Y., Matsunaga T., Saitoh S., Akashi-Takamura S., Hayashi H., Fujii I., Miyake K., Muraguchi A., and Takatsu K. (2012) Glycyrrhizin and isoliquiritigenin suppress the LPS sensor toll-like receptor 4/MD-2 complex signaling in a different manner. J. Leukocyte Biol. 91, 967–976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ando K., Suzuki S., Saeki T., Tamura G., and Arima K. (1969) Funiculosin, a new antibiotic. I. Isolation, biological and chemical properties (studies on antiviral and antitumor antibiotics. 8). J. Antibiot. 22, 189–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ando K., Matsuura I., Nawata Y., Endo H., Sasaki H., Okytomi T., Saehi T., and Tamura G. (1978) Funiculosin, a new antibiotic. II. Structure elucidation and antifungal activity. J. Antibiot. 31, 533–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Akashi S., Shimazu R., Ogata H., Nagai Y., Takeda K., Kimoto M., and Miyake K. (2000) Cutting edge: cell surface expression and lipopolysaccharide signaling via the toll-like receptor 4-MD-2 complex on mouse peritoneal macrophages. J. Immunol. 164, 3471–3475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Cooperstock M. S. (1974) Inactivation of endotoxin by polymyxin B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 6, 422–425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ohto U., Fukase K., Miyake K., and Shimizu T. (2012) Structural basis of species-specific endotoxin sensing by innate immune receptor TLR4/MD-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 7421–7426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Shin H. J., Lee H., Park J. D., Hyun H. C., Sohn H. O., Lee D. W., and Kim Y. S. (2007) Kinetics of binding of LPS to recombinant CD14, TLR4, and MD-2 proteins. Mol. Cells 24, 119–124 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Miyake K., Yamashita Y., Hitoshi Y., Takatsu K., and Kimoto M. (1994) Murine B cell proliferation and protection from apoptosis with an antibody against a 105-kD molecule: unresponsiveness of X-linked immunodeficient B cells. J. Exp. Med. 180, 1217–1224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Miyake K., Shimazu R., Kondo J., Niki T., Akashi S., Ogata H., Yamashita Y., Miura Y., and Kimoto M. (1998) Mouse MD-1, a molecule that is physically associated with RP105 and positively regulates its expression. J. Immunol. 161, 1348–1353 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ogata H., Su I., Miyake K., Nagai Y., Akashi S., Mecklenbräuker I., Rajewsky K., Kimoto M., and Tarakhovsky A. (2000) The toll-like receptor protein RP105 regulates lipopolysaccharide signaling in B cells. J. Exp. Med. 192, 23–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nagai Y., Shimazu R., Ogata H., Akashi S., Sudo K., Yamasaki H., Hayashi S., Iwakura Y., Kimoto M., and Miyake K. (2002) Requirement for MD-1 in cell surface expression of RP105/CD180 and B-cell responsiveness to lipopolysaccharide. Blood 99, 1699–1705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Banchereau J., and Steinman R. M. (1998) Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392, 245–252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rescigno M., Winzler C., Delia D., Mutini C., Lutz M., and Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. (1997) Dendritic cell maturation is required for initiation of the immune response. J. Leukocyte Biol. 61, 415–421 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Yamamoto M., Sato S., Hemmi H., Hoshino K., Kaisho T., Sanjo H., Takeuchi O., Sugiyama M., Okabe M., Takeda K., and Akira S. (2003) Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science 301, 640–643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fenton M. J., and Golenbock D. T. (1998) LPS-binding proteins and receptors. J. Leukocyte Biol. 64, 25–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wurfel M. M., Monks B. G., Ingalls R. R., Dedrick R. L., Delude R., Zhou D., Lamping N., Schumann R. R., Thieringer R., Fenton M. J., Wright S. D., and Golenbock D. (1997) Targeted deletion of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein gene leads to profound suppression of LPS responses ex vivo, whereas in vivo responses remain intact. J. Exp. Med. 186, 2051–2056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wright S. D., Ramos R. A., Tobias P. S., Ulevitch R. J., and Mathison J. C. (1990) CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 249, 1431–1433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Akashi S., Saitoh S., Wakabayashi Y., Kikuchi T., Takamura N., Nagai Y., Kusumoto Y., Fukase K., Kusumoto S., Adachi Y., Kosugi A., and Miyake K. (2003) Lipopolysaccharide interaction with cell surface Toll-like receptor 4-MD-2: higher affinity than that with MD-2 or CD14. J. Exp. Med. 198, 1035–1042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zanoni I., Ostuni R., Marek L. R., Barresi S., Barbalat R., Barton G. M., Granucci F., and Kagan J. C. (2011) CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4. Cell 147, 868–880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Saitoh S., Akashi S., Yamada T., Tanimura N., Kobayashi M., Konno K., Matsumoto F., Fukase K., Kusumoto S., Nagai Y., Kusumoto Y., Kosugi A., and Miyake K. (2004) Lipid A antagonist, lipid IVa, is distinct from lipid A in interaction with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-MD-2 and ligand-induced TLR4 oligomerization. Int. Immunol. 16, 961–969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Brasseur G., and Brivet-Chevillotte P. (1994) Specificities of the two center N inhibitors of mitochondrial bc1 complex, antimycin and funiculosin: strong involvement of cytochrome b-asparagine-208 in funiculosin binding. FEBS Lett. 354, 23–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hailman E., Lichenstein H. S., Wurfel M. M., Miller D. S., Johnson D. A., Kelley M., Busse L. A., Zukowski M. M., and Wright S. D. (1994) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein accelerates the binding of LPS to CD14. J. Exp. Med. 179, 269–277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ryu J. K., Kim S. J., Rah S. H., Kang J. I., Jung H. E., Lee D., Lee H. K., Lee J. O., Park B. S., Yoon T. Y., and Kim H. M. (2017) Reconstruction of LPS transfer cascade reveals structural determinants within LBP, CD14, and TLR4-MD2 for efficient LPS recognition and transfer. Immunity 46, 38–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kim J. I., Lee C. J., Jin M. S., Lee C. H., Paik S. G., Lee H., and Lee J. O. (2005) Crystal structure of CD14 and its implications for lipopolysaccharide signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11347–11351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kelley S. L., Lukk T., Nair S. K., and Tapping R. I. (2013) The crystal structure of human soluble CD14 reveals a bent solenoid with a hydrophobic amino-terminal pocket. J. Immunol. 190, 1304–1311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Arditi M., Zhou J., Torres M., Durden D. L., Stins M., and Kim K. S. (1995) Lipopolysaccharide stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases p44, p42, and p41 in vascular endothelial cells in a soluble CD14-dependent manner. Role of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in lipopolysaccharide-induced stimulation of endothelial cells. J. Immunol. 155, 3994–4003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Perera P. Y., Mayadas T. N., Takeuchi O., Akira S., Zaks-Zilberman M., Goyert S. M., and Vogel S. N. (2001) CD11b/CD18 acts in concert with CD14 and toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 to elicit full lipopolysaccharide and taxol-inducible gene expression. J. Immunol. 166, 574–581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Jürgens G., Müller M., Garidel P., Koch M. H., Nakakubo H., Blume A., and Brandenburg K. (2002) Investigation into the interaction of recombinant human serum albumin with Re-lipopolysaccharide and lipid A. J. Endotoxin Res. 8, 115–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Esparza G. A., Teghanemt A., Zhang D., Gioannini T. L., and Weiss J. P. (2012) Endotoxin-albumin complexes transfer endotoxin monomers to MD-2 resulting in activation of TLR4. Innate Immun. 18, 478–491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kaca W., Roth R. I., and Levin J. (1994) Hemoglobin, a newly recognized lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein that enhances LPS biological activity. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25078–25084 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Rock K. L., Latz E., Ontiveros F., and Kono H. (2010) The sterile inflammatory response. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 321–342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Nhu Q. M., Shirey K., Teijaro J. R., Farber D. L., Netzel-Arnett S., Antalis T. M., Fasano A., and Vogel S. N. (2010) Novel signaling interactions between proteinase-activated receptor 2 and Toll-like receptors in vitro and in vivo. Mucosal Immunol. 3, 29–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Shirey K. A., Lai W., Scott A. J., Lipsky M., Mistry P., Pletneva L. M., Karp C. L., McAlees J., Gioannini T. L., Weiss J., Chen W. H., Ernst R. K., Rossignol D. P., Gusovsky F., Blanco J. C., and Vogel S. N. (2013) The TLR4 antagonist Eritoran protects mice from lethal influenza infection. Nature 497, 498–502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kawai T., Adachi O., Ogawa T., Takeda K., and Akira S. (1999) Unresponsiveness of MyD88-deficient mice to endotoxin. Immunity 11, 115–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Inaba K., Inaba M., Romani N., Aya H., Deguchi M., Ikehara S., Muramatsu S., and Steinman R. M. (1992) Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176, 1693–1702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ohto U., Miyake K., and Shimizu T. (2011) Crystal structures of mouse and human RP105/MD-1 complexes reveal unique dimer organization of the toll-like receptor family. J. Mol. Biol. 413, 815–825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bowers K. J., Chow E., Xu H., Dror R. O., Eastwood M. P., Gregersen B. A., Klepeis J. L., Kolossvary I., Moraes M. A., Sacerdoti F. D., Salmon J. K., Shan Y., and Shaw D. E. (2006) in Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06), Tampa, FL (Horner-Miller B., ed) Abstr. 84, Association for Computing Machinery; New York [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sastry G. M., Adzhigirey M., Day T., Annabhimoju R., and Sherman W. (2013) Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J. Comput. Aid Mol. Des. 27, 221–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Friesner R. A., Banks J. L., Murphy R. B., Halgren T. A., Klicic J. J., Mainz D. T., Repasky M. P., Knoll E. H., Shelley M., Perry J. K., Shaw D. E., Francis P., and Shenkin P. S. (2004) Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1739–1749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Halgren T. A., Murphy R. B., Friesner R. A., Beard H. S., Frye L. L., Pollard W. T., and Banks J. L. (2004) Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1750–1759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








