Abstract
The golden jackal (Canis aureus) is a species under significant and fast geographic expansion. Various parasites are known from golden jackals across their geographic range, and certain groups can be spread during their expansion, increasing the risk of cross-infection with other carnivores or even humans. The current list of the golden jackal parasites includes 194 species and was compiled on the basis of an extensive literature search published from historical times until April 2017, and is shown herein in synoptic tables followed by critical comments of the various findings. This large variety of parasites is related to the extensive geographic range, territorial mobility and a very unselective diet. The vast majority of these parasites are shared with domestic dogs or cats. The zoonotic potential is the most important aspect of species reported in the golden jackal, some of them, such as Echinococcus spp., hookworms, Toxocara spp., or Trichinella spp., having a great public health impact. Our review brings overwhelming evidence on the importance of Canis aureus as a wild reservoir of human and animal parasites.
Keywords: Golden jackal, Canis aureus, Parasites
Background
The golden jackal, Canis aureus (Carnivora: Canidae) is a medium-sized canid species [1] also known as the common or Asiatic jackal [2], Eurasian golden jackal [3] or the reed wolf [4]. Traditionally, Canis aureus has been regarded as a polytypic species (Table 1), with 14 subspecies distributed across a vast geographical territory in Europe, Asia and Africa [5, 6]. Recently, phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that at least two of the African subspecies need a formal recognition as distinct species. Koepfli et al. [3] suggested that C. aureus anthus forms a distinct monophyletic lineage to C. aureus and should be recognized as a separate species. Similarly, the phylogenetic comparison of the Egyptian jackal (C. aureus lupaster) with other wolf-like canids showed a close relationship with the gray wolf species complex rather than with other subspecies of golden jackals [7]. Nevertheless, because most of the studies dealing with parasites of golden jackals do not mention the subspecies, for the purpose of this review we have considered the entire group, without excluding the two former subspecies.
Table 1.
Subspecies and geographical distribution of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Subspecies | Common name | Range | Synonyms |
---|---|---|---|
Canis a. aureus Linnaeus, 1758 | Common jackal | Middle Asia; Afghanistan; Iran; Iraq; Arabian Peninsula; Baluchistan; northwestern India | C. balcanicus; C. caucasica; C. dalmatinus; C. hadramauticus; C. hungaricus; C. kola; C. lanka; C. maroccanus; C. typicus; C. vulgaris |
Canis a. algirensis Wagner, 1841 | Algerian wolf | Algeria; Morocco; Tunisia | C. barbarus; C. grayi; C. tripolitanus; |
Canis a. anthus Cuvier, 1820 | Senegalese wolf; grey jackal; slender jackal | Senegal | C. senegalensis |
Canis a. bea Heller, 1914 | Serengeti wolf; Serengeti jackal | Kenya; northern Tanzania | |
Canis a. cruesemanni Matschie, 1900 | Siamese jackal; South East Asian jackal | Thailand; Myanmar; East India | |
Canis a. ecsedensis Kretzoi, 1947 | Pannonian jackal | Pannonian Basin | C. minor; C. balcanicus; C. hungaricus |
Canis a. indicus Hodgson, 1833 | Indian jackal; Himalayan jackal | Pakistan; India; Nepal; Bhutan; Burma | |
Canis a. lupaster Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1833 | African wolf; Egyptian wolf; Egyptian jackal | Egypt; Algeria; Mali; Ethiopian Highlands; Senegal | C. lupaster; C. lupus lupaster; C. sacer |
Canis a. moreoticus Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1835 | European jackal; Caucasian jackal; Reed wolf | Southeastern Europe; Asia Minor; Caucasus | C. graecus |
Canis a. naria Wroughton, 1916 | Sri Lankan jackal | Southern India; Sri Lanka | C. lanka |
Canis a. palaestina Khalaf, 2008 | Palestine; Israel | ||
Canis a. riparius Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1832 | Somali wolf | Somalia; Ethiopia; Eritrea | C. hagenbecki; C. mengesi; C. somalicus |
Canis a. soudanicus Thomas, 1903 | Variegated wolf; Nubian wolf | Sudan; Somalia | C. doederleini; C. nubianus; C. thooides; C. variegatus |
Canis a. syriacus Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1833 | Syrian jackal | Israel; Lebanon; Jordan |
The distribution of golden jackals is limited to the Old World [8]. Molecular evidence supports an African origin for all wolf-like canids including the golden jackal [8]. It is considered that the colonization of Europe by the golden jackal took place during the late Holocene and early Neolithic, through the Balkan Peninsula [9]. During the last century, the species has recorded at least two geographic expansion events. A notable expansion started in the 1950s, with a second one following during the 1980s. This is particularly evident in Europe. Stable reproductive populations have been recorded in about 20 European countries, while in other nine, vagrant specimens were observed [10]. The factors that facilitate the territorial expansion of golden jackals are unclear, but land use [11], climate change [12, 13], and the lack of intra-genus competition have been suggested [12–14].
Golden jackals have an opportunistic nutritional behaviour with an extremely varied diet [15]. They prey or scavenge on small mammals, birds and their eggs, amphibians, reptiles, even invertebrates, and they take carrion when available. Occasionally, jackals also feed on vegetables or fruits. Additionally, their relatively broad home range, varying from 1.1 to 20.0 km2 [16, 17], increases the chance of contact with various parasites but also with other hosts.
All these biological and behavioural features create premises for their infection with a broad range of pathogens, including parasites. Golden jackals are known to host a large spectrum of viral, bacterial and parasitic pathogens [18–20]. The literature survey indicates that the studies published on golden jackal parasites are usually limited to a country or, more commonly to a region, and there is no synoptic overview on this potentially important topic. The aim of the present work was to review all the published data on the parasite fauna of golden jackals in a comprehensive and updated list. The goal is consistent with the demographic and territorial expansion tendency of this species and increased contact with domestic animals and humans.
Literature survey methodology
The list of the golden jackal parasites was compiled on the basis of an extensive literature search published from historical times until April 2017. Abstracts in conference proceedings and theses were also considered. The search queries were performed in the several databases: Pub Med [21], Science Direct [22], Web of Science [23], Helminthological Abstracts [24], Biological Abstracts [25], BioOne [26], Host-Parasite Database of the Natural History Museum (London) [27] and the web search engine Google Scholar [28]. Additionally, two Russian databases, namely the Russian Scientific Electronic Library [29] and the Scientific Library Earth Papers [30] were also used as sources of information.
The parasites are listed in tables, organized according to their taxonomic rank, and species within families are alphabetically listed. Taxonomy follows Adl et al. [31] for protists; Gibson et al. [32], Jones et al. [33], and Bray et al. [34] for trematodes; Kahlil et al. [35] and Nakao et al. [36] for cestodes; De Ley & Blaxter [37] for nematodes; Amin [38] for acanthocephalans; and the database “Catalogue of Life: 2016 Annual Checklist” by Roskov et al. [39] for arthropods. The names of the species were updated according to the current taxonomy, but synonyms used by different authors are also indicated. Each species is indexed together with the country of the report, the method of examination and reference. The records within a species are listed according to the alphabetical order of the country name. If two or more reports for the same country are registered, the ranking was made chronologically, according to the year publication. The prevalence, frequency and intensity of infection are also given, when available. The prevalence was provided or calculated only when the sample size was at least 10. In the case of experimental infection studies, the country has not been specified. Articles that report infections in captive jackals and doubtful records are mentioned and/or discussed accordingly.
Protists
Eight families with 21 species were reported in golden jackals in 23 countries. Additionally, several protists were identified only to the generic level or were doubtfully considered as parasites of golden jackals (Table 2) [40–85].
Table 2.
Protist parasites of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Family | Species | Origin | Prevalence (%) | Frequency | Method | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phylum Apicomplexa | ||||||
Class Aconoidasida | ||||||
Babesiidae | Babesia canis (syn. Piroplasma canis) | na (as P. canis) | na | na | EI | [40] |
Nigeriaa | na | 1/6 | BS | [41] | ||
Romania | 9.2 | 5/54 | MI | [42] | ||
Babesia gibsoni | na | na | na | EI | [43] | |
India | na | na | BS | [44] | ||
Theileriidae | “Theileria annae” | Romania | 3.7 | 2/54 | MI | [42] |
Class Conoidasida | ||||||
Eimeriidae | Eimeria sp.b | Bulgaria | 5.8 | 3/56 | CO | [45] |
Eimeria aurei b | India | na | na | CO | [46] | |
Isospora sp. | Bulgaria | 5.8 | 3/56 | CO | [45] | |
Indiaa | case report | CO | [47] | |||
Iran | 7.1 | 4/56 | CO | [48] | ||
Serbia | 6.6 | 4/60 | CO | [49] | ||
Isospora dutoiti | former USSR | na | na | CO | [50] | |
Turkmenistan | na | na | CO | [51] | ||
Isospora kzilordiniensis | Kazakhstan | na | 2/9 | CO | [52] | |
Isospora neorivolta | Russia | 9.3 | 14/150 | CO | [53] | |
Isospora ohioensis | Russia | 5.3 | 8/150 | CO | [53] | |
Isospora theileri | Azerbaijan | na | na | CO | [54] | |
Turkmenistan | na | na | CO | [51] | ||
Hepatozoidae | Hepatozoon sp. | Algeria | na | 2/5 | MI | [55] |
Mauritania | 25.0 | 4/16 | MI | [55] | ||
Hepatozoon canis | Austria | case report | MI | [56] | ||
case report | MI | [42] | ||||
Croatia | 30.4 | 14/46 | MI | [57] | ||
Czech Republic | na | 1/1 | MI | [42] | ||
Hungary | 57.9 | 33/57 | MI | [57] | ||
60.0 | na | MI | [58] | |||
Israel | 2.1 | 1/46 | BS | [19] | ||
Montenegro | na | 2/2 | MI | [57] | ||
Romania | 72.2 | 39/54 | MI | [42] | ||
Serbia | 67.5 | 140/206 | MI | [57] | ||
Sarcocystidae | Cystoisospora canis | Hungary | 15.0 | 3/20 | CO | [59] |
Neospora caninum | Israel | 1.7 | 2/114 | IFAT | [60] | |
Sarcocystis sp. | Bulgaria | 1.9 | 1/56 | CO | [45] | |
Sarcocystis cruzi (syn. S. bovicanis) | Russia (as S. bovicanis) | 20.0 | 30/150 | CO | [53] | |
Sarcocystis tenella (syn. S. ovicanis) | Russia (as S. ovicanis) | 34.0 | 51/150 | CO | [53] | |
Sarcocystis tropicalis (syn. Isospora tropicalis) | India (as I. tropicalis) | case report | CO | [61] | ||
India | case report | CO | [62] | |||
Toxoplasma-type oocysts | Hungary | 5.0 | 1/20 | CO | [59] | |
Toxoplasma gondii | Iran | 33.3 | na | LAST | [63] | |
77.5 | 31/40 | ELISA | [64] | |||
“Flagellates”c | ||||||
Hexamitidae | Giardia sp. | Iraqa | 100 | 4/4 | CO | [65] |
Giardia duodenalis (syn. G. canis) | Croatia | 12.5 | 1/8 | IF, MI | [66] | |
Iran | 7.1 | 4/56 | CO | [48] | ||
Russia (as G. canis) | 1.3 | 2/150 | CO | [53] | ||
Trichomonadidae | Pentatrichomonas hominis (syn. P. canis auri) | India (as P. canis auri) | case report | CO | [67] | |
Trypanosomatidae | Leishmania sp. | Iran | 2.5 | 4/161 | SIO | [68] |
12.5 | 6/48 | IFA | ||||
Serbia | 6.9 | 15/126 | MI | [69] | ||
Spaina | case report | H | [70] | |||
Leishmania donovani | Bangladesh | 5 cases | na | MI | [71] | |
Georgia | na | 1/4 | SIO | [72] | ||
Kazakhstan | na | na | na | [73] | ||
Iran | 5.0 | 1/20 | SIO | [74] | ||
na | na | na | EI | [75] | ||
Leishmania infantum | Algeria | case report | IFI, MI | [76] | ||
Georgia | 2.5 | 1/39 | IA | [77] | ||
Iran | 10.0 | 1/10 | DAT, ELISA, IFAT | [78] | ||
11.6 | 7/60 | DAT | [78] | |||
1.6 | 1/60 | SIO | ||||
Iraq | 59.6 | 90/151 | SIO, Cult, IFAT, ELISA | [79] | ||
Israel | 7.6 | 4/53 | ELISA | [80] | ||
6.5 | 3/46 | ELISA | [19] | |||
1.3 | 1/77 | MI | [81] | |||
Kazakhstan | na | na | na | [82] | ||
Romania | 2.7 | 1/36 | MI | [42] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [83] | ||
Turkmenistan | 2 specimens | na | na | [84] | ||
Leishmania major | na | na | na | EI | [85] | |
Leishmania tropica | Israel | 6.5 | 5/77 | na | [81] |
Abbreviations: BS blood smear May-Grünwald-Giemsa stained, CO coprological examination, Cult cultures from the viscera, blood and other tissues, DAT direct agglutination test, EI experimental infection, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, H histopathology, IA immunochromatographic assay, IF immunofluorescence assay, IFAT indirect fluorescent antibody test, IFI indirect fluorescent immunoassay, LAST latex agglutination slide test, MI- molecular identification, SIO smears from internal organs stained with standard Giemsa, na not applicable/unknown
aAnimals kept in captivity
bDoubtful record
cVarious opinions on the higher taxonomy of these groups are available, hence we keep the generic term “flagellates”
Leishmania
The sand fly-borne kinetoplastids of the genus Leishmania were reported in golden jackals from 13 countries (Table 2), showing a large geographical distribution in Asia, Africa and Europe. At least three species of Leishmania have been identified by molecular methods in naturally infected golden jackals (L. donovani, L. infantum and L. tropica). Additionally, golden jackals were experimentally shown to be receptive for the infection with L. major [85], but this species has never been found in naturally infected specimens. The multiple records of Leishmania spp. in golden jackals suggest a reservoir role for this carnivore, for both visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis in humans, as well as for canine leishmaniasis. Infected jackals have been found also at the margin of the endemic area for canine leishmaniasis (i.e. Romania), where this finding has been temporally correlated with the re-emergence of the disease in domestic dogs [86]. Although there is no clear link between the emergence of leishmaniasis in dogs and the spreading of jackals, this is an issue to be further investigated, mainly as the jackal continues to spread into areas at the margin of canine leishmaniasis endemicity. This was previously demonstrated when infected dogs were newly introduced to non-endemic areas in Europe [87].
Tick-borne protists (Babesiidae, Theileriidae and Hepatozoidae)
Experimental evidence showed that golden jackals are receptive to the infection with Babesia canis [40] and B. gibsoni [43]. However, there are surprisingly few records of natural infections with piroplasms in golden jackals (Table 2) despite the large variety and number of studies on ticks (see below). In Europe, the only Babesia species molecularly confirmed in golden jackals is B. canis, recently reported in Romania [42]. The other report of B. canis in jackals is from Nigeria [41], but the species identification was based on blood smears and in captive animals. We consider this record doubtful, as the typical vector for B. canis, Dermacentor reticulatus, does not occur in Nigeria. Probably the species in this case belongs to the same complex group of large canine Babesia known in this area, B. rossi or B. vogeli [88]. Babesia gibsoni, which is widely distributed in Asia, has been reported only once in golden jackals, in India. Although Babesia rossi is common in domestic and wild carnivores in Africa [89], so far there are no records of this species in golden jackals. The scarcity of reports of Babesia spp. in this wild canid is probably related to the low number of studies and the lack of more sensitive/specific methods, as the typical vector ticks [D. reticulatus for B. canis, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (sensu lato) for B. vogeli and Haemaphysalis leachi for B. rossi] have been reported on various occasions on these hosts.
An interesting recent report indicates the presence of “Theileria annae” in golden jackals from Romania [42]. Currently, the taxonomic status of this species is debated and it is most commonly referred to as “Babesia microti-like”. This group has been reported predominantly in red foxes, but also in several other wild carnivores in North America, Asia and Europe [89]. However, so far, the role of golden jackals in its ecology remains unknown.
The first report of Hepatozoon canis in golden jackals is relatively recent [19] and has been followed in the last years by several records, mainly in Europe and North Africa (Table 2). Surprisingly, despite the wide distribution of H. canis in canids [90], this tick-borne apicomplexan has never been found in jackals from sub-Saharan Africa or Asia. Nevertheless, the large number of records and the presence of its main vector, R. sanguineus (s.l.) suggest a reservoir role of golden jackals for H. canis at least in Europe, Middle East and North Africa.
Intestinal homoxenous coccidia (Eimeriidae)
Various species of intestinal coccidia of the family Eimeriidae have been found in, or even described from jackals (Table 2). We consider all records of Eimeria as pseudoparasites, as previously suggested [91]. Three species of the genus Isospora have been described from golden jackals but currently their taxonomic status is listed as doubtful [91]: Isospora dutoiti is a misidentification with Hammondia spp. or Neospora caninum, while I. theileri and I. kzilordiniensis are probably invalid names (as they might be synonyms with other Isospora species from canids). Two other species, I. neorivolta and I. ohioensis, which are known to infect several species of canids [91], were reported in golden jackals. Interestingly, all these Isospora reports in golden jackals are from countries in the former USSR, and this probably reflects a greater interest of researchers from this area for this group of parasites rather than the real geographical distribution. Few reports of unnamed Isospora sp. in golden jackals are known from Asia and the Balkans (Table 2).
Heteroxenous coccidia (Sarcocystidae)
Various records list golden jackals host to Sarcocystidae. Sporocysts of Sarcocystis (S. cruzi, S. tenella and S. tropicalis) and oocysts of Cystoisospora canis have been reported in the faeces of golden jackals in Europe, Russia and India, suggesting their role as definitive hosts (Table 2). Although antibodies against Neospora caninum have been detected in C. aureus in Israel [60], the role of golden jackals as definitive hosts for this parasite has never been demonstrated and needs to be investigated. So far, various canid species were demonstrated to shed oocysts of N. caninum: dogs (Canis familiaris) [92], coyotes (C. latrans) [93], dingoes (C. lupus dingo) [94], and gray wolves (C. lupus) [95]. Interestingly, Takacs et al. [59] reported “Toxoplasma-like” oocysts in the faeces of jackals but, unfortunately, no morphometric data were provided and there was no attempt to characterize them molecularly. We can only assume that these were small oocysts which, in our opinion, could represent any of the small canine coccidia N. caninum, Besnoitia spp. or Hammondia spp., none of them confirmed so far in golden jackals.
Helminths
The highest number of studies on the parasitic fauna of golden jackals are related to helminths. Our literature survey found at least 178 publications in 38 countries reporting helminths in golden jackals, with 119 species belonging to three phyla: Platyhelminthes, Nematoda and Acanthocephala [96–119].
Trematodes
The diversity of trematodes in golden jackals is relatively high (27 species from nine families) (Table 3). Most of the studies originate in the countries of the former USSR, Asia and North Africa, with few scattered records in Europe. There are no trematodes recorded in golden jackals in sub-Saharan Africa. This situation reflects probably the impact of the Russian helminthological school and the lack of studies in other regions rather than the influence of ecological factors or feeding behaviour of jackals. Among the various records of trematodes in golden jackals, two groups could be identified: the canid- or Carnivora-specific trematodes and other trematodes (specific rather to other mammal groups or birds).
Table 3.
A comprehensive list of trematode parasites of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Family | Species | Origin | Prevalence (%) | Frequency | Intensity | Method | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phylum Platyhelminthes | |||||||
Class Trematoda | |||||||
Dicrocoeliidae | Dicrocoelium dendriticum (syn. D. lanceatum) | Russia | 5.0 | 1/20 | 5.00 ± 4.45 | necropsy | [96]a |
26.1 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [98] | |||
Diplostomidae | Alaria alata | Azerbaijan | 22.4 | 20/89 | 2–30 | necropsy | [99] |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 9.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
1.9 | 1/56 | na | necropsy | [45] | |||
Croatia | na | na | na | na | [102] | ||
Chechnya | 100 | 16/16 | 22–268 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Greece | 20.0 | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
Hungary | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | ||
Russia | 10.0 | 2/20 | 3.00 ± 2.68 | necropsy | [96] | ||
34.8 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [98] | |||
13.3 | 8/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
26.0 | 39/150 | 2–23 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 0.9 | 4/447 | 19.00 ± 3.63 | necropsy | [108] | ||
30.0 | 18/60 | na | necropsy | [49] | |||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | na | [109] | ||
Alaria americana (syn. A. canis)b | Iran | 5.0 | 1/20 | 34 | necropsy | [110] | |
10.0 | 1/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |||
Pharyngostomum cordatum (syn. P. fausti) | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Azerbaijan (as P. fausti) | 8.3 | 1/12 | 2 | necropsy | [99] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Russia | 6.6 | 4/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
Echinostomatidae | Echinochasmus corvus | India | na | na | na | na | [112] |
Echinochasmus schwartzi | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | |
Euparyphium sp. | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | |
Euparyphium melis | Russia | 16.6 | 10/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |
Heterophyidae | Ascocotyle italica (syn. Parascocotyle italica) | Russia | 8.3 | 5/60 | na | necropsy | [106] |
Ascocotyle sinoecum (syn. Phagicola sinoecum) | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | |
Cryptocotyle lingua b | Russia | 2.7 | 4/150 | 3–18 | necropsy | [53] | |
Heterophyes sp. | Egypt | na | 3/5 | na | necropsy | [113] | |
Heterophyes aequalis | Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [113] | |
Heterophyes dispar | Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [113] | |
Heterophyes heterophyes | Egypt | 2 specimens | na | na | necropsy | [113] | |
Metagonimus ciureanus (syn. Dexiogonimus ciureanus) | Georgia | na | na | na | necropsy | [114] | |
Metagonimus yokogawai | Iran | 14.2 | 4/28 | na | necropsy | [115] | |
Italy | case report | 6 | necropsy | [116] | |||
Serbia | 1.6 | 1/60 | na | necropsy | [49] | ||
Microphallidae | Microphallus narii (syn. Spelotrema narii) | India | na | na | na | na | [117] |
na | na | na | na | [112] | |||
Opisthorchiidae | Metorchis xanthosomus b | Russia | 21.8 | na | na | necropsy | [97] |
Opisthorchis sp. | Bangladesh | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [118] | |
Pseudamphistomum truncatum | Serbia | 0.2 | 1/447 | 2 | necropsy | [108] | |
3.3 | 2/60 | na | necropsy | [49] | |||
Plagiorchiidae | Plagiorchis sp. | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] |
Plagiorchis elegans b | Russia | 3.3 | 2/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |
Plagiorchis massino | Uzbekistan | na | na | na | na | [109] | |
Schistosomatidae | Schistosoma spindale b | India | case report | na | CO | [119] | |
Troglotrematidae | Nanophyetus salmincola b | India | case report | na | CO | [47] |
Abbreviations: na not applicable/unknown, CO coprological examination
aUnknown site of infection
bDoubtful record
The most commonly reported and widely distributed trematode in golden jackals is Alaria alata, found in Caucasus, Russia and Central Asia to Middle East and the Balkans (Table 3). We consider the report of Alaria americana in Iran doubtful, as the species is known otherwise only in canids from North America [120].
Jackals have been commonly reported as hosts for fish-borne trematodes typically associated with carnivores. Such examples include species of the genera Ascocotyle, Cryptocotyle, Heterophyes, Metagonimus (Heterophyidae), Echinochasmus, Euparyphium (Echinostomatidae), Pseudamphistomum, Opisthorchis (Opisthorchiidae) mainly in Asia and northern Africa. The fish-borne Nanophyetus salmincola was identified in India, but its geographical distribution is limited to the Pacific Northwest of the USA [121]; with high probability, the report might represent a misidentification with N. schikhobalowi, an Asian troglotrematid [122]. The diversity of trematode species in golden jackals is completed by other groups which use various invertebrates (i.e. arthropods) (Plagiorchis massino, Microphallus narii) or non-fish small vertebrates (i.e. amphibians) (Pharyngostomum cordatum) as second intermediate hosts, reflecting the wide diet composition of this carnivore.
Interestingly, Dicrocoelium dendriticum, a hepatic fluke typically associated with herbivores, has been found on several occasions in the bile ducts of golden jackals [97, 98] in Russia. As the infection source for this parasite is represented by ant second intermediate hosts, the infection of jackals is probably accidental.
Several of these trematodes reported in golden jackals have zoonotic potential. Human alariosis caused by Alaria mesocercariae manifests in various clinical signs which range from cutaneous symptoms to respiratory disorders, a diffuse unilateral neuroretinitis even to an anaphylactic shock with fatal outcome [123]. However, all human cases originate in North America (and are probably caused by A. americanum). The zoonotic potential of A. alata in Eurasia remains unknown. Adults Heterophyes dispar and H. heterophyes may produce diarrhoea, abdominal pain and discomfort in humans [124], while Metagonimus yokogawai is considered to be the most common intestinal trematode infection in the Far East, highly important due to the ability of their eggs to invade the blood stream thus causing serious complications [125]. Hence, golden jackals might have a significant role in the environmental contamination with such parasites and represent an indirect source for human contamination. Hepatic and biliary trematodes D. dendriticum, Pseudamphistomum truncatum and Opisthorchis felineus are also able to infect humans, causing abdominal pain, weight loss, chronic relapsing watery diarrhea and hepatobiliary system damages [126, 127].
However, for many other trematode species, golden jackals, as other carnivores, are probably accidental hosts, or most likely, present a pseudoparasitism following ingestion of birds or rodents, as they typically infect other vertebrate groups. For instance, Cryptocotyle lingua is mainly a parasite of different gull species in Europe, North America and Japan [128]; Plagiorchis elegans is a parasite of raptors, waterfowl, passerines and several mammals as the wood mouse, rat, gerbil and hamster [129]; Metorchis xanthosomus is specific for birds in Anseriformes, Gaviiformes, Podicipediformes and Gruiformes [130]; and Schistosoma spindale has been described in ruminants and rodents in southeastern Asia [131].
Cestodes
Cestode infections in golden jackals have been recorded across all their distribution range, with a relatively high species diversity (Table 4) [132–152].
Table 4.
A comprehensive list of cestode parasites of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Family | Species | Origin | Prevalence (%) | Frequency | Intensity | Method | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phylum Platyhelminthes | |||||||
Class Cestoda | |||||||
Dilepididae | Aelurotaenia cameroni | India | na | na | na | na | [132] |
Diphyllobothriidae | Diphyllobothrium sp. | Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [133] |
Diphyllobothrium latum | Bangladesh | 20.0 | 6/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | |
India | na | na | na | na | [112] | ||
Spirometra sp. | Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [135] | |
Iran | 7.1 | 1/14 | 4 | necropsy | [136] | ||
Spirometra erinaceieuropaei (syn. S. erinacei) | Azerbaijan | 25.0 | 19/76 | 1–19 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Azerbaijan (as S. erinacei) | 3.5 | 4/114 | 2–21 | necropsy | [137] | ||
Iran (as S. erinacei) | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | ||
Spirometra houghtoni | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | |
Spirometra mansoni (syn. Bothriocephalus mansoni) | Italy | case report | na | necropsy | [138] | ||
Dipylidiidae | Diplopylidium noelleri | Iran | 5.0 | na | na | necropsy | [139] |
Tunisia | 16.0 | 5/31 | 1–66 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Dipylidium caninum (syns Taenia elliptica, T. cucumerina) | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Bangladesh | 26.6 | 8/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | ||
Bulgaria | 3.8 | na | na | necropsy | [141] | ||
63.6 | 7/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | |||
Chechnya | 100 | 16/16 | 3–12 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Hungary | 5.0 | 1/20 | 4 | necropsy | [59] | ||
India | na | na | na | na | [143] | ||
na | na | na | na | [112] | |||
Indiaa | 5.0 | 3/60 | na | CO | [144] | ||
Iran | 7.1 | 1/14 | 4 | necropsy | [136] | ||
10.0 | 4/40 | na | necropsy | [145] | |||
20.0 | 2/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |||
10.1 | 8/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
33.9 | 19/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
Israel | 46.6 | 7/15 | na | necropsy | [146] | ||
5.8 | 1/17 | na | CO | [19] | |||
Italy | na | na | na | necropsy | [138] | ||
Kazakhstan | 16.6 | 3/18 | 2–8 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Russia | 47.8 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
5.0 | 1/20 | 1.00 ± 0.25 | necropsy | [96] | |||
10.0 | 6/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
8.0 | 12/150 | 1–13 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 1.6 | 7/447 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [149] | ||
16.0 | 5/31 | 4–67 | necropsy | [140] | |||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [150] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Joyeuxiella echinorhynchoides | Azerbaijan | 30.2 | 23/76 | 1–30 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Iran | 27.8 | 5/18 | na | necropsy | [334] | ||
7.5 | 3/40 | na | necropsy | [145] | |||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [150] | ||
Joyeuxiella pasqualei | Iran | 30.0 | 3/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |
Mesocestoididae | Mesocestoides sp. group A (oval to elongate cirrus-pouch and short cirrus) | Israel | 8.1 | 7/86 | na | necropsy, ME | [335] |
Mesocestoides sp. group B (broad-oval cirrus-pouch and long, more or less strongly coiled cirrus) | Israel | 15.2 | 13/85 | na | necropsy, ME | ||
Mesocestoides sp. | Greece | na | 3/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | |
Tunisia | na | 2/5 | na | necropsy | [149] | ||
Iran | na | 1/1 | na | necropsy | [336] | ||
Bulgaria | 34.6 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | ||
Mesocestoides corti | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Tunisia | 12.9 | 4/31 | 1–10 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Mesocestoides lineatus (syn. M. carnivoricolus) | Azerbaijan | 2.6 | 3/114 | 9–47 | necropsy | [137] | |
37.7 | 37/98 | 2–63 | necropsy | [99] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 27.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
72.7 | 8/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | |||
Hungary | 20.0 | 4/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
India | na | na | na | na | [112] | ||
India (as M. carnivoricolus) | na | na | na | necropsy | [337] | ||
Ingushetia | na | 1/2 | na | necropsy | [338] | ||
Iran | 15.0 | 3/20 | na | necropsy | [110] | ||
70.0 | 7/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |||
36.7 | 29/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
30.3 | 17/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
61.1 | 11/18 | na | necropsy | [334] | |||
Russia | 26.1 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
5.0 | 1/20 | 1.00 ± 0.53 | necropsy | [96] | |||
40.0 | 24/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [339] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [98] | |||
40.0 | 60/150 | 1–128 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 5.8 | 26/447 | 69.7 ± 9.3 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | 74.0 | 23/31 | na | necropsy | [140] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [340] | ||
Ukraine | na | 1/1 | 5 | necropsy | [341] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Mesocestoides litteratus | Serbia | 4.7 | 21/447 | 64.3 ± 15.1 | necropsy | [108] | |
Tunisia | 23.0 | 7/31 | 6–130 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Mesocestoides petrowi | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Russia | na | na | na | necropsy | [342] | ||
Mesocestoides zacharovae | Azerbaijan | case report | na | necropsy | [343] | ||
Taeniidae | Echinococcus granulosus | Azerbaijan | 16.3 | 16/98 | 2–400 | necropsy | [99] |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bangladesh | 20.0 | 6/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | ||
Bulgaria | 23.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
na | 3/3 | na | PCR | [344] | |||
9.0 | 1/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | |||
1.9 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | |||
Ceylon | case report | 7 | necropsy | [345] | |||
Chad | 1.2 | 1/82 | na | necropsy | [346] | ||
Chechnya | na | na | na | necropsy | [347] | ||
12.0 | 2/16 | 8–16 | necropsy | [103] | |||
Chechnya, Ingushetia | na | 2/7 | 74–217 | necropsy | [348] | ||
Hungary | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
India | na | na | na | CO | [349] | ||
Iran | 5.0 | 1/20 | 48 | necropsy | [110] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | |||
16.0 | na | na | necropsy | [350] | |||
2.3 | 2/86 | na | necropsy | [351] | |||
40.0 | 16/40 | na | necropsy | [145] | |||
40.0 | 16/40 | na | necropsy | [352] | |||
8.9 | 7/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
20.0 | 2/10 | na | necropsy | [353] | |||
66.7 | 6/9 | na | CO | [353] | |||
na | 1/1 | na | PCR | [354] | |||
3.5 | 2/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
na | na | na | PCR | [355] | |||
Italy | case report | 1 | necropsy | [356] | |||
Kazakhstan | 5.9 | na | 3–29 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Kenya | 27.2 | 6/22 | < 200 | necropsy | [357] | ||
Palestine | na | na | na | na | [358] | ||
Pakistan | 9.0 | 9/100 | na | necropsy | [359] | ||
Russia | 12.5 | 2/16 | na | necropsy | [360] | ||
82.6 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | |||
69.8 | na | na | necropsy | [361] | |||
5.0 | 1/20 | 4.00 ± 2.36 | necropsy | [96] | |||
66.0 | 10/15 | na | CO | [362] | |||
3.3 | 2/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
Tajikistan | 30.7 | 4/13 | > 1,000 | necropsy | [363] | ||
Tunisia | na | 1/5 | 72 | necropsy | [149] | ||
na | 2/2 | na | PCR | [364] | |||
9.7 | 3/31 | 11–98 | necropsy | [140] | |||
E. multilocularis (syn. Alveococcus multilocularis) | Azerbaijan | 3.7 | 2/54 | 3–5 | necropsy | [99] | |
Hungary | 9.0 | 1/11 | 412 | necropsy | [365] | ||
Ingushetia | na | 1/2 | na | necropsy | [338] | ||
Iran | 16.0 | 4/25 | na | necropsy | [366] | ||
50.0 | 5/10 | na | necropsy | [353] | |||
na | 9/9 | na | CO | [353] | |||
Russia (as Alveococcus multilocularis) | 18.7 | 3/16 | na | necropsy | [360] | ||
Serbia | 14.3 | 4/28 | 4–57 | necropsy | [367] | ||
Tajikistan | 7.7 | 1/13 | na | necropsy | [363] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | 1/4 | na | necropsy | [368] | ||
Multiceps multiceps (syn. Taenia multiceps | Azerbaijan | 8.9 | 8/89 | 2–11 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bangladesh (as T. multiceps) | 10.0 | 3/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | ||
Bulgaria | 9.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
9.0 | 1/11 | necropsy | [142] | ||||
Chechnya | na | na | na | necropsy | [347] | ||
Iran | 7.5 | 3/40 | necropsy | [145] | |||
India | na | na | na | necropsy | [369] | ||
Kazakhstan | 11.1 | 2/18 | 4–16 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Russia | 39.1 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
Serbia | 1.6 | 7/447 | 3.00 ± 0.53 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Tajikistan | na | 2/6 | na | necropsy | [370] | ||
Ukraine | na | 1/1 | na | necropsy | [341] | ||
Taenia serialis | Kazakhstan | 5.5 | 1/18 | 10 | necropsy | [147] | |
Kenya | na | 2/2 | 42 | PCR | [371] | ||
Serbia | 1.1 | 5/447 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Taenia sp. | Bulgaria | 23.0 | na | na | necropsy | [141] | |
Greece | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
India | na | na | na | na | [143] | ||
Indiaa | 11.6 | 7/60 | na | CO | [144] | ||
Irana | na | 2/2 | 11 ± 2 epg | CO | [372] | ||
Kenya | 60.0 | 3/5 | na | necropsy | [373] | ||
Tunisia | 19 | 6/31 | 1–29 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Taenia crassiceps | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Hungary | 40.0 | 8/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Russia | 25.0 | 15/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
Taenia hydatigena (syn. T. marginata) | Azerbaijan | 15.3 | 14/91 | 1–18 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 55.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
27.2 | 3/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | |||
Chechnya | na | na | na | necropsy | [347] | ||
50.0 | 8/16 | 3–6 | necropsy | [103] | |||
Hungary | 15.0 | 3/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
India | na | na | na | necropsy | [369] | ||
Iran | 7.1 | 1/14 | 2 | necropsy | [136] | ||
40.0 | 16/40 | na | necropsy | [145] | |||
10.0 | 1/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |||
7.6 | 6/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
7.1 | 4/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
5.6 | 1/18 | na | necropsy | [334] | |||
Italy (as T. marginata) | na | na | na | na | [138] | ||
Kazakhstan | 22.0 | 4/18 | 2–8 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Russia | 6.2 | 1/16 | na | necropsy | [360] | ||
36.8 | 14/38 | 1–3 | necropsy | [374] | |||
34.8 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | |||
5.0 | 1/20 | 3.00 ± 2.18 | necropsy | [96] | |||
1.6 | 1/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [98] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
Serbia | 0.9 | 4/447 | 3.75 ± 1.80 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | ||
Taenia krabbei | Azerbaijan | 0.8 | 1/114 | 3 | necropsy | [137] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Taenia krepkogorski (syn. Hydatigera krepkogorski) | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Taenia ovis | Azerbaijan | 5.1 | 2/39 | 1–2 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | case report | na | necropsy | [375] | |||
Iran | 5.6 | 1/18 | necropsy | [334] | |||
Russia | 39.1 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
USSR (former) | na | na | na | necropsy | [376] | ||
Taenia pisiformis (syn. T. serrata) | Azerbaijan | 15.7 | 14/89 | 1–6 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 18.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
54.5 | 6/11 | necropsy | [142] | ||||
Chechnya | 100 | 16/16 | 3–18 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Greece | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
Hungary | 20.0 | 4/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
India (as T. serrata) | na | na | na | na | [377] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [369] | |||
Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | ||
Kazakhstan | 5.5 | 1/18 | 3 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Russia | 17.4 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
3.3 | 2/60 | necropsy | [106] | ||||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
16.7 | 25/150 | 1–3 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 1.8 | 8/447 | 10.1 ± 2.1 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | 3.2 | 1/31 | 1 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Taenia polyacantha (syn. Tetratirotaenia polyacantha) | Azerbaijan (as Tetratirotaenia polyacantha) | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [340] | ||
Taenia taeniaeformis (syn. Hydatigera taeneiformis) | Azerbaijan (as H. taeneiformis) | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [152] |
Abbreviations: CO coprological examination; ME microscopic/morphological examination; PCR polymerase chain reaction; epg eggs per gram faeces; na not applicable/not available
aAnimals kept in captivity
Among all the cestode species, Aelurotaenia cameroni is the only one known exclusively in the golden jackal. However, as the species was only recently described [132], its absence from other carnivores cannot be excluded until further studies. It is not surprising that all other identified tapeworm species are characteristic to carnivores, confirming the low specific affinity of the adult parasites [153]. As such species infect usually a wider range of canid or non-canid carnivores, this demonstrates a close environmental connection between multiple carnivore species and the use of the same trophic source.
The most commonly reported tapeworms in golden jackals are Dipylidium caninum, Mesocestoides spp., Echinococcus granulosus and Taenia spp., found across a wide geographical range (Europe, Asia and Africa). The cosmopolitan character of all these cestodes is attributed to the abundance and diversity of intermediate hosts and the lack of specificity for the definitive hosts [153]. Hence, the jackal, together with other carnivores, represents an important source of environmental contamination. Several of these species are known to be zoonotic, some with a minor impact (i.e. D. caninum), but other being a major public health threat (i.e. E. granulosus).
Dipylidium caninum occurs across the globe, human cases being reported in European and Asian countries after accidental ingestion of the infected cat and dog fleas with cysticercoid larvae [154]. Although the jackal is not a domestic species, hence not a direct source of infection to humans, it may transmit fleas to hunting, shepherd or stray dogs and participates together with other wild canids in the natural cycle of this cestode.
Several species of the genus Mesocestoides have been found in golden jackals in various regions. Mesocestoides lineatus is spread in Africa, Asia and Europe; it was rarely found in humans, with about 20 cases being described to date across the world [155]. Although the main definitive hosts are carnivores, humans can also act as accidental final hosts following ingestion of raw or undercooked meat of birds, amphibians, reptiles or small mammals [156]. The zoonotic potential of the other species of Mesocestoides in unknown.
The most well-represented family of tapeworms found in jackals is the Taeniidae. The high diversity of the Taeniidae in golden jackals reflects furthermore the wide range of mammalian prey species on which they feed. Golden jackals are hosts to both zoonotic species of Echinococcus. Echinococcus granulosus and E. multilocularis have been reported in this wild canid on multiple occasions and across a wide geographical range. The unilocular or cystic hydatidosis produced by larvae of E. granulosus (sensu lato) is a ubiquitous infection with high prevalence in various parts of the world [157]. Human multilocular or alveolar echinococcosis caused by E. multilocularis has recorded a significant increase in the incidence in northern Eurasia since 1990 [157, 158]. In several regions, high prevalences with both species were reported in golden jackals (Table 4). Reports of Echinococcus spp. in areas where this canid has recently spread or increased in abundance (i.e. central and eastern Europe) raise the important question on its role as a potentially new natural reservoir and infection source for humans and livestock.
Among species of genus Taenia and Multiceps, the most commonly reported species in golden jackals are T. hydatigena, T. pisiformis, T. ovis and M. multiceps. Other species (T. polyacantha, T. taeniaeformis, T. krabbei, T. krepkogorski, T. crassiceps and M. serialis) have been also found but only occasionally, mainly within the limited geographical range of Caucasus and central Asia (Table 4). The zoonotic potential of these species is limited, and only few human cases have been reported so far: T. taeniaeformis [159–162], T. crassiceps [163], T. hydatigena [164], T. ovis [165, 166], M. multiceps and M. serialis [167]. Taenia krabbei, T. krepkogorski and T. polyacantha are considered non-zoonotic tapeworms [158, 168]. Considering the common findings of a wide range of Taeniidae in golden jackals, the high spatial mobility of these hosts and the high resistance of taeniid eggs in the environment [169], the role of jackals as natural reservoirs and infection source for humans and domestic animals should be considered potentially important.
Species of Spirometra (Diphyllobothriidae) identified in golden jackals from Europe and Asia (S. mansoni, S. houghtoni and S. erinaceieuropaei) cause sparganosis in intermediate hosts. Humans may acquire the infection after drinking water contaminated with infected copepods or by ingestion of uncooked meat, and occasionally may lead to blindness, paralysis, and death [170, 171]. Diphyllobothrium latum is also reported in humans due to consumption of raw or undercooked fish, in cold water areas from the Holarctic Eurasia, overlaid to those regions where the species is recorded in jackal [172]. However, due to the limited number of reports, the role of golden jackals in the natural cycle of these diphyllobothriid cestodes remains unknown.
Tapeworm species with a limited geographic distribution are also reported in jackals. Diplopylidium noelleri and Joyeuxiella spp. are spread only in warm regions from Asia and Europe, probably due to the high abundance and diversity of reptiles, known as common intermediate hosts [173].
Acanthocephalans
Although the diet of golden jackals generally includes invertebrates, wild birds, reptiles and small mammals which are intermediate or paratenic hosts in the life-cycle of thorny-headed worms [174–176], compared to other groups of helminths, there are only few and geographically limited reports of acanthocephalans in golden jackals. The diversity of acanthocephalans identified in this canid includes at least six species (Table 5) [176–181].
Table 5.
Acanthocephalan parasites of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Family | Species (synonym) | Origin | Prevalence (%) | Frequency | Intensity | Method | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class Archiacanthocephala | |||||||
Oligacanthorhynchidae | Macracanthorhynchus sp. | Iran | 10.0 | 1/10 | necropsy | [111] | |
Macracanthorhynchus catulinus | Azerbaijan | 0.8 | 1/114 | 24 | necropsy | [137] | |
17.0 | 14/82 | 1–6 | necropsy | [99] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 3.8 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | ||
Kazakhstan | 5.5 | 1/18 | 3 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Russia | 6.6 | 4/60 | n/a | necropsy | [106] | ||
6.7 | 10/150 | 1–6 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Turkmenistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [177] | ||
Macracanthorhynchus hirudinaceus a | Tunisia | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [149] | |
3.2 | 1/31 | 6 | necropsy | [140] | |||
Iran | case report | na | necropsy | [178] | |||
62.5 | 25/40 | na | necropsy | [179] | |||
30.0 | 3/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |||
5.0 | 4/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
3.5 | 2/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
Oncicola sp. | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [178] | |
Oncicola canis | Iran | case report | na | necropsy | [178] | ||
12.6 | 10/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
Pachysentis canicola | Iran | case report | na | necropsy | [180] | ||
Class Palaeacanthocephala | |||||||
Centrorhynchidae | Centrorhynchus itatsinis | Azerbaijan | 1.4 | 1/71 | na | necropsy | [181] |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Incertae sedis | Echinorhynchus pachyacanthus | Italy | na | na | na | necropsy | [138] |
Abbreviation: na not applicable/not available/no answer
aDoubtful record
Macracanthorhynchus catulinus has been reported on several occasions in jackals in former USSR and Bulgaria, while the congeneric species M. hirudinaceus was found only in Tunisia and Iran. It is unclear if the reports of M. hirudinaceus (a parasite typically found in pigs; [155]) represent cases of pseudoparasitism or misidentifications with M. catulinus (a parasite typically found in canids), as most papers referring to these findings do not provide details on the identification methods. There are few scattered records of other carnivore-specific acanthocephalan species in golden jackals (Oncicola canis, Pachysentis canicola, Centrorhynchus itatsinis and Echinorhynchus pachyacanthus) in central Asia and Italy (Table 5).
Nematodes
Nematodes constitute the most well-represented group of parasites in golden jackals, with 41 species identified (28 species in Chromadorea and 13 species in Enoplea) (Table 6) [182–256].
Table 6.
Nematode parasites of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Family | Species (synonym) | Origin | Prevalence (%) | Frequency | Intensity | Method | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phylum Nematoda | |||||||
Class Chromadorea | |||||||
Ancylostomatidae | Ancylostoma sp. | Indiaa | na | 3/3 | na | CO | [182] |
na | 5/5 | na | CO | [183] | |||
31.6 | 19/60 | na | CO | [144] | |||
case report | 700 epg | CO | [184] | ||||
case report | na | CO | [47] | ||||
Irana | na | 2/2 | 10.5 epg | CO | [372] | ||
Ancylostoma/Uncinaria sp. | Bulgaria | 84.6 | na | na | necropsy | [141] | |
Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [135] | ||
India | na | 3/6 | na | CO | [185] | ||
Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | ||
Serbia | 33.3 | 20/60 | na | necropsy | [49] | ||
Tunisia | na | 5/5 | na | necropsy | [149] | ||
Ancylostoma braziliense b | India | na | na | na | na | [117] | |
Ancylostoma caninum | Azerbaijan | 17.3 | 17/98 | 1–20 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bangladesh | 46.6 | 14/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | ||
Bulgaria | 54.5 | 6/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | ||
11.5 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | |||
Chechnya | 50.0 | 8/16 | 3–18 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [186] | ||
Greece | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
Hungary | 40.0 | 8/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
India | na | na | na | na | [187] | ||
na | na | na | na | [143] | |||
na | na | na | na | [188] | |||
Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [189] | ||
100 | 12/12 | 100–400 epg | CO | [190] | |||
Iran | 100 | 20/20 | 27.1 | necropsy | [110] | ||
7.1 | 1/14 | 4 | necropsy | [136] | |||
2.5 | 2/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
case report | na | necropsy | [155] | ||||
3.5 | 2/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
Israel | 33.3 | 5/15 | na | necropsy | [146] | ||
76.0 | 13/17 | 50–800 epg | CO | [19] | |||
Russia | 52.2 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
5.0 | 3/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
12.0 | 18/150 | 3–265 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 0.2 | 1/447 | 2 | necropsy | [108] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | 9.7 | 3/31 | 2–4 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
Ancylostoma guentini | India | na | na | na | necropsy | [191] | |
Placoconus lotoris (syn. Uncinaria lotoris)b | Russia | 16.6 | 2/12 | 4 | necropsy | [98] | |
Uncinaria stenocephala | Afghanistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [192] | |
Azerbaijan | 50.0 | 49/98 | 1–404 | necropsy | [99] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 64.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [237] | |||
45.4 | 5/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | |||
84.6 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | |||
Chechnya | 50.0 | 8/16 | 4–23 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Greece | na | 4/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
Hungary | 40.0 | 8/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Iran | 85.0 | 17/20 | 11.1 | necropsy | [110] | ||
6.3 | 5/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
Russia | 34.8 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [339] | |||
30.0 | 18/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
89.3 | 134/150 | 3–550 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | 68.0 | 21/31 | 1–54 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [150, 194] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Ascarididae | Baylisascaris devosi | Azerbaijan | 17.7 | 14/79 | 1–16 | necropsy | [99] |
Toxascaris sp. | Kazakhstan | 11.1 | 2/18 | 2–8 | necropsy | [147] | |
Toxascaris leonina | Afghanistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [192] | |
Armeniaa | case report | na | CO | [195] | |||
Azerbaijan | 0.8 | 1/114 | 1 | necropsy | [137] | ||
31.8 | 29/91 | 1–19 | necropsy | [99] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 36.0 | na | na | necropsy | [101] | ||
5.8 | na | na | necropsy | [141] | |||
Chechnya | 100 | 16/16 | 1–12 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [186] | ||
Hungary | 15.0 | 3/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Iran | 30.0 | 3/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | ||
Irana | na | 2/2 | 166.5 epg | CO | [372] | ||
Kazakhstan | 11.1 | 2/18 | 2–11 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Russia | 43.5 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
10.0 | 2/20 | 4.00 ± 3.14 | necropsy | [96] | |||
15.0 | 9/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [98] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
4.7 | 7/150 | 2–23 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | 6.5 | 2/31 | 1–7 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [150] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Toxocara sp. | Indiaa | 21.6 | 13/60 | na | CO | [144] | |
na | na | na | CO | [196] | |||
na | 2/2 | 40–700 epg | CO | [197] | |||
na | 3/6 | na | CO | [185] | |||
Toxocara canis (syn. Belascaris marginata) | Azerbaijan | 32.6 | 32/98 | 1–21 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bangladesh | 40.0 | 12/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | ||
na | 2/5 | na | CO | [118] | |||
Bulgaria | 54.5 | 6/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | ||
7.7 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | |||
Chechnya | 50.0 | 8/16 | 3–18 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Greece | na | 2/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
Hungary | 20.0 | 4/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
India (as B. marginata) | na | na | na | na | [187] | ||
na | na | na | na | [143] | |||
na | na | na | na | [112] | |||
Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [189] | ||
Iran | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [110] | ||
7.1 | 1/14 | 10 | necropsy | [136] | |||
10.0 | 1/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | |||
5.0 | 4/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
12.5 | 7/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
Irana | na | 2/2 | 25 ± 5 epg | CO | [372] | ||
Russia | 60.9 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
5.0 | 1/20 | 2.00 ± 2.13 | necropsy | [96] | |||
6.6 | 4/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [98] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
23.3 | 35/150 | 1–22 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 1.6 | 7/447 | 7.8 ± 2.1 | necropsy | [108] | ||
23.3 | 14/60 | na | necropsy | [49] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Tunisia | 16.0 | 5/31 | 1–9 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [150] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Toxocara cati (syns Ascaris mystax, T. mystax)b | Italy | na | na | na | necropsy | [138] | |
Russia | 26.1 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
5.0 | 1/20 | 2.0 ± 1.9 | necropsy | [96] | |||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | ||
Crenosomatidae | Crenosoma vulpis | Azerbaijan | 14.6 | 12/82 | 1–19 | necropsy | [99] |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bangladesh | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [118] | ||
Chechnya | 100 | 16/16 | 10–23 | necropsy | [103] | ||
Hungary | 30.0 | 6/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Russia | 26.1 | n/a | na | necropsy | [97] | ||
10.0 | 6/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
na | na | na | necropsy | [107] | |||
12.0 | 18/150 | 6–297 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Crenosoma petrowi | Chechnya | 37.5 | 6/16 | 16–38 | necropsy | [103] | |
Diaphanocephalidae | Kalicephalus schadi fotedari b | India | na | na | na | necropsy | [198] |
Dracunculidae | Dracunculus medinensis | India | na | na | na | na | [112] |
Kazakhstan | 16.6 | 3/18 | 2–4 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Gnathostomatidae | Gnathostoma spinigerum | India, Bangladesh, Burma | na | na | na | na | [112] |
Bangladesh | 26.6 | 8/30 | na | necropsy | [134] | ||
Gongylonematidae | Gongylonema sp.b | Serbia | 0.4 | 2/447 | 1 | necropsy | [108] |
Metastrongylidae | Angiostrongylus vasorum | na | na | 1/1 | na | EI | [199] |
Hungary | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Molineidae | Molineus patens | Russia | 8.3 | 5/60 | na | necropsy | [106] |
26.0 | 39/150 | 3–104 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Onchocercidae | Acanthocheilonema reconditum (syn. Dipetalonema reconditum) | Bulgaria | 30.0 | 3/10 | na | K | [200] |
Kenya (as Dipetalonema reconditum) | na | na | na | na | [201] | ||
Dirofilaria immitis | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Bangladesh | na | 4/5 | na | necropsy | [118] | ||
Bulgaria | 8.9 | 5/56 | 2–16 | necropsy/K | [202] | ||
9.6 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | |||
70.0 | 7/10 | na | K | [200] | |||
37.5 | 122/325 | 1–19 | necropsy | [203] | |||
Greece | case report | 4 | necropsy | [204] | |||
Hungary | 7.4 | 2/27 | 1–10 | necropsy | [205] | ||
Indiaa | na | na | na | na | [206] | ||
Iran | 28.5 | 4/14 | 13 | necropsy | [136] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [207] | |||
11.4 | 9/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
1.7 | 1/56 | na | necropsy | [48] | |||
8.9 | 4/45 | 1–10 | necropsy, molecular | [208] | |||
Romania | 18.52 | 10/54 | 1–7 | necropsy | [209] | ||
9.26 | 5/54 | na | molecular | [209] | |||
Russia | 8.3 | 1/12 | 29 | necropsy | [98] | ||
8.3 | 5/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | |||
20.0 | na | na | necropsy | [339] | |||
22.7 | 34/150 | 2–23 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 7.3 | 32/437 | na | necropsy | [210] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | ||
Dirofilaria repens | Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [186] | |
Iran | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [110] | ||
Romania | 1.8 | 1/54 | na | molecular | [209] | ||
Russia | 3.3 | 2/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | ||
Oxyuridae | Syphacia sp.b | Kazakhstan | 5.5 | 1/18 | 7 | necropsy | [147] |
Physalopteridae | Physaloptera sp. | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] |
Kazakhstan | 5.5 | 1/18 | 4 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Physaloptera sibirica | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Kazakhstan | 11.1 | 2/18 | 1–3 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Rictulariidae | Rictularia sp. | Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [186] |
Greece | na | 1/5 | na | necropsy | [104] | ||
Rictularia affinis (syn. Pterygodermatites affinis) | Azerbaijan | 36.3 | 28/77 | 1–29 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 7.7 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | ||
India (as P. affinis) | na | na | na | na | [117] | ||
na | na | na | na | [188] | |||
na | na | na | na | [112] | |||
Iran | 50.0 | 5/10 | na | necropsy | [111] | ||
5.0 | 4/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | |||
Kazakhstan | 11.1 | 2/18 | 1–3 | necropsy | [147] | ||
Tunisia (as P. affinis) | 6.5 | 2/31 | 1 | necropsy | [140] | ||
Turkmenistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [177] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Rictularia cahirensis | Egypt | na | na | na | necropsy | [186] | |
Iran | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [110] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | necropsy | [340] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
Spirocercidae | Spirocerca arctica | Azerbaijan | 16.6 | 2/12 | 5–14 | necropsy | [99] |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Spirocerca lupi (syn. Filaria sanguinolenta) | Azerbaijan | 23.4 | 23/98 | 1–29 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
India | case report | na | necropsy | [211] | |||
na | na | na | na | [112] | |||
Indiaa | case report | na | necropsy | [212] | |||
Iran | 2.5 | 2/79 | na | necropsy | [139] | ||
Italy (as F. sanguinolenta) | na | na | na | necropsy | [138] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
Spirocerca sanguinolenta | India | na | na | na | necropsy | [213] | |
Strongyloididae | Strongyloides sp. | Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [214] |
Irana | na | 2/2 | 5.5 ± 0.7 epg | CO | [372] | ||
Strongyloides stercoralis | Iran | na | na | na | necropsy | [105] | |
Subuluridae | Oxynema linstowi | Tunisia | 3.2 | 1/31 | 2 | necropsy | [140] |
Thelaziidae | Thelazia callipaeda | Romania | 1.6 | 1/64 | 70 | necropsy | [215] |
Class Enoplea | |||||||
Capillariidae | Capillaria sp. | Indiaa | na | na | na | CO | [214] |
Russia | 2.7 | 4/150 | 1–45 | necropsy | [53] | ||
Eucoleus aerophilus (syn. Thominx aerophilus) | Azerbaijan (as T. aerophilus) | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Hungary | 5.0 | 1/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Russia | 8.3 | 5/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
37.3 | 56/150 | 1–6 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Capillaria boehmi | Russia | 30.0 | 45/150 | 1–11 | necropsy | [53] | |
Capillaria plica | Azerbaijan | 14.8 | 4/27 | 1–4 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bulgaria | 16.4 | na | na | necropsy | [45] | ||
Hungary | 45.0 | 9/20 | na | necropsy | [59] | ||
Russia | 11.6 | 7/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
33.3 | 50/150 | 1–123 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Capillaria putorii | Azerbaijan | na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |
Dioctophymatidae | Dioctophyme renale | Azerbaijan | 3.5 | 4/114 | 1 | necropsy | [137] |
Iran | 35.0 | 7/20 | na | necropsy | [110, 216] | ||
Russia | 3.3 | 2/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [148] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | necropsy | [151] | ||
na | na | na | necropsy | [152] | |||
Dioctophyme skrjabini | Russia | 17.4 | na | na | necropsy | [97] | |
Trichinellidae | Trichinella sp. | Armenia | 33.3 | 5/15 | na | TRIC | [217] |
Azerbaijan | 30.1 | na | na | TRIC | [218] | ||
28.6 | na | na | TRIC | [219] | |||
Bulgaria | 50.0 | na | na | TRIC | [220] | ||
33.3 | 15/45 | na | TRIC | [221] | |||
21.2 | 7/33 | na | TRIC | [222] | |||
Croatia | na | na | na | AD | [102] | ||
Georgia | 80.0 | na | na | TRIC | [218] | ||
Romania | 53.7 | 29/54 | na | TRIC | [223] | ||
Russia | 14.3 | na | na | TRIC | [224] | ||
case report | na | AD | [225] | ||||
25.0 | 75/302 | na | TRIC | [226] | |||
case report | na | AD | [227] | ||||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | TRIC | [228] | ||
Thailand | case report | na | TRIC | [229] | |||
case report | na | TRIC | [230] | ||||
USSR (former) | 36.5 | na | na | TRIC | [231] | ||
Yugoslavia (former) | 25.0 | na | na | TRIC | [232] | ||
Trichinella britovi | Algeria | case report | na | PCR | [233] | ||
Azerbaijan | case report | na | AD | [234] | |||
Iran | 11.1 | 2/18 | na | AD, PCR | [235] | ||
Kazakhstan | na | na | na | TRIC | [234] | ||
Lithuania | na | 3/4 | 0.9–1.4 lpg | AD, PCR | [236] | ||
Romania | case report | 55 lpg | AD, PCR | [237] | |||
Serbia | 4.7 | 2/42 | na | AD, PCR | [238] | ||
15.4 | 2/13 | na | AD, PCR | [239] | |||
27.8 | 25/90 | 1.1–57.6 lpg | AD, PCR | [240] | |||
Turkmenistan | case report | na | AD | [234] | |||
Uzbekistan | case report | na | AD | [234] | |||
Trichinella nativa | Kazakhstan | 18.9 | 4/18 | 7 lpg | AD | [147] | |
Lithuania | n/a | 1/4 | 0.9–1.4 lpg | AD, PCR | [236] | ||
URSS (former) | 61.5 | na | na | TRIC | [241] | ||
Trichinella nelsoni | Iran | na | 2/2 | na | TRIC | [242] | |
Kazakhstan | 16.2 | 3/18 | 6 lpg | na | [147] | ||
Trichinella pseudospiralis | Russia | 2.7 | 4/150 | na | TRIC | [53] | |
Trichinella spiralis | Afghanistan | case report | 214 lpg | TRIC | [243] | ||
Azerbaijan | 20.4 | 17/83 | 1–7 lpg | TRIC | [244] | ||
21.1 | 25/114 | 1–22 lpg | TRIC | [137] | |||
17.5 | 16/91 | 1–44 lpg | TRIC | [99] | |||
Bulgaria | na | na | na | TRIC | [245] | ||
45.0 | na | na | TRIC | [101] | |||
40.0 | na | na | AD | [45] | |||
Georgia | 36.6 | na | na | TRIC | [246] | ||
Hungary | 9.0 | 1/11 | na | AD, PCR | [365] | ||
Iran | 60.3 | 38/63 | na | TRIC | [247] | ||
55.5 | 10/18 | na | TRIC | [248] | |||
na | 3/3 | na | TRIC | [249] | |||
55.7 | 59/106 | na | TRIC | [250] | |||
84.0 | na | na | TRIC | [251] | |||
Kazakhstan | 5.5 | 1/18 | 3 lpg | TRIC | [147] | ||
Russia | 43.5 | na | na | TRIC | [97] | ||
21.6 | 13/60 | na | TRIC | [106] | |||
55.3 | 83/150 | na | TRIC, AD | [53] | |||
Senegal | 33.0 | na | na | TRIC | [252] | ||
Serbia | na | 3/3 | 1.9–21.4 lpg | AD, PCR | [253] | ||
8.3 | 1/12 | 3 lpg | AD, PCR | [254] | |||
7.9 | 3/38 | 3 lpg | AD, PCR | [255] | |||
14.2 | 6/42 | na | AD, PCR | [238] | |||
38.4 | 5/13 | na | AD, PCR | [239] | |||
71.1 | 64/90 | 0.59–152.8 lpg | AD, PCR | [240] | |||
Tunisia | na | 2/2 | na | TRIC | [256] | ||
Trichuroididae | Trichuris sp. | Indiaa | 15.0 | 9/60 | na | CO | [144] |
Trichuris georgicus (syn. Trichocephalus georgicus) | Azerbaijan | 14.4 | 12/83 | 1–12 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Trichuris vulpis (syn. Trichocephalus vulpis) | Azerbaijan (as Trichocephalus vulpis) | 11.2 | 11/98 | 1–11 | necropsy | [99] | |
na | na | na | necropsy | [100] | |||
Bangladesh | na | 1/5 | na | CO | [118] | ||
Bulgaria | 30.7 | na | 1–156 | necropsy | [141] | ||
36.3 | 4/11 | na | necropsy | [142] | |||
Russia (as Trichocephalus vulpis) | 21.6 | 13/60 | na | necropsy | [106] | ||
35.3 | 53/150 | 1–70 | necropsy | [53] | |||
Serbia | 11.6 | 4/60 | na | necropsy | [49] | ||
Hungary | 10.0 | 2/20 | na | necropsy | [59] |
Abbreviations: AD artificial digestion, CO coprological examination, EI experimental infection, epg eggs per gram faeces, lpg larvae per gram tissue, K Knott test, PCR polymerase chain reaction, TRIC trichinelloscopy, na not applicable/not available
aAnimals kept in captivity
bDoubtful record
Ascarids
Ascarids, primarily considered heteroxenous nematodes, have lost their intermediate hosts and have adapted to direct transmission or through paratenic hosts [257]. Four species are reported in golden jackals, with Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina being ubiquitous. Baylisascaris devosi is a species typically found in mustelids inhabiting the northern hemisphere [258]. Its presence in golden jackals has been reported only once, in Azerbaijan [99]. This broad distribution and common presence of ascarids in this wild canid can be explained by the intervention of numerous paratenic hosts, possible preys for jackals, in the life-cycle of these nematode species (mostly rodents and invertebrates such as earthworms and insects) [259].
Strongyloides
The cosmopolitan and zoonotic Strongyloides stercoralis infects about 200 million people, more commonly in tropical and subtropical climates [260]. Despite the large number of records in domestic dogs from various countries, the species has been reported only once in golden jackals (Table 6). The lack of reports in other parts of the jackal’s range could be explained by a low receptivity of this host or by failures of finding the parasites during necropsy due to their small size. A moderate prevalence of 5.6% is also recorded in dogs from northeastern Iran [261] which is higher than estimated prevalence in humans across the country that ranges between 0.1 and 0.3% [262]. Although carnivores can be a source of infection for humans via larvae that develop in the environment, the principal reservoirs of S. stercoralis are humans. The role of domestic and wild carnivores in the epidemiology of strongyloidiasis remains to be clarified [155].
Hookworms and other digestive tract strongylids
Several hookworm (Ancylostomatidae) species have been reported in golden jackals, with Ancylostoma caninum and Uncinaria stenocephala commonly reported across the entire geographical range of these hosts. Additionally, A. guentini was described from golden jackals in India, being so far the only known host for this parasite [191]. The remaining two records (Placoconus lotoris, known otherwise only from new world procyonids, and Ancylostoma braziliense, typically found in the Americas) we list as doubtful and as these are probably misidentifications of other hookworm species. The opportunistic behaviour of the golden jackals leads them to venture close to human habitats to feed [2]. The proximity with domestic dogs allows interspecific transmission of ancylostomid species, due to the high rate of soil and grass contamination [263]. In this regard, increased prevalence recorded in Russia, ranging between 5.0 and 52.2%, is correlated with similar values in dogs, between 2.06 and 62.3% [264]. Ancylostoma caninum and U. stenocephala possess a zoonotic potential causing dermal larva migrans in humans [260]. Although a direct relationship between the numerous reports in golden jackals and the presence of disease in humans cannot be established, this carnivore species probably contributes to the presence of Ancylostomatidae larvae in rural and periurban areas.
Molineus patens is a hookworm commonly reported in a wide range of carnivores in the Palaearctic and Nearctic [265], including two records from jackals in Russia. However, its zoonotic role has not been documented.
Metastrongyloids
Compared to foxes, little is known about the respiratory and cardiovascular strongylids of golden jackals. Crenosoma vulpis has been reported on several occasions in Asia and Europe, with variable prevalence (Table 6). There is a single report of Crenosoma petrowi in golden jackals, a parasite otherwise known mainly from mustelids in North America [266], one report from bears (also in North America) and another one from stone martens in Italy [267]. Surprisingly, there is only one record of Angiostrongylus vasorum in golden jackals, suggesting either a lack of habitat overlap or a low detection sensitivity during necropsy.
Filarioids
Zoonotic filarioids Acanthocheilonema reconditum, Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens have been all reported in golden jackals in various countries (Table 6). They have been found both as adults during necropsies but also as microfilariae demonstrating the reservoir role of jackals. Dirofilaria spp. are responsible in humans of conjunctivitis, focal pulmonary infarction with granuloma formation and subcutaneous and submucosal lesions in the lung and conjunctiva [268–270]. A recent review listed 1782 human Dirofilaria spp. infections, out of which 372 were pulmonary (in Australia, North and South America) and 1410 were subcutaneous/ocular cases (mostly in Europe and Asia) [271]. Acanthocheilonema reconditum is considered non-pathogenic for canids [155], but a single human case is well documented as being caused by this species and at least other two, by other Acanthocheilonema species [270, 272, 273]. The recorded prevalence of D. immitis has significantly varied in different areas between 7.3% in Serbia and 80.0% in Bangladesh, and seems to be consistent with the prevalence registered in dogs, generally between 40 and 70% in endemic areas [155]. The prevalence of D. repens in golden jackals ranged between 3.3 and 10.0%, resembling that recorded in dogs, generally varying from 5 to 20% [155].
The oriental eye-worm Thelazia callipaeda has been identified in golden jackals only in Romania [215], but this is probably due to lack of proper examinations of the eyes during the necropsy in other studies rather than a resistance of this host. Dogs originating in the Far East were initially considered the main host of the nematode [257]. Over the last 15 years, T. callipaeda has shown an increase in the distribution area mainly in Europe, with many new host records [274]. Human thelaziosis followed the same geographical spreading, with recent cases of infection diagnosed [274]. In this epidemiological picture, the golden jackal occurs as a new reservoir host.
Capillariids
Respiratory capillariids of carnivores (C. aerophila, C. boehmi and C. putorii) are considered primarily homoxenous, but the earthworms often act as facultative intermediate hosts [1, 275]. Along with the heteroxenous species Capillaria plica found in the urinary bladder, all species are cosmopolitan [257]. They have been found in golden jackals in Russia and other former Soviet Union countries. Only C. plica and C. aerophila are known to be zoonotic [276, 277], but their public health impact is minor. As the primary source of infection with Capillaria is the soil contaminated by infective eggs [155], the jackal can play an epidemiological role and secondary source of infection for domestic carnivores and humans.
Trichinella
Trichinellids are an important group of meat-borne zoonotic parasites [278] for which the golden jackals represent an important reservoir. Five species, T. britovi, T. nativa, T. nelsoni, T. pseudospiralis and T. spiralis, were recorded in mountainous and lowland regions across the distribution range of the golden jackal in Europe and Asia. However, only three of these (T. britovi, T. nativa and T. spiralis) have been confirmed molecularly (Table 6). We consider all the records by artificial digestion or trichinelloscopy (see Table 6) where the species is named as hypothetic, as there is no reliable morphological means of differentiation between species, hence we recommend to consider these as Trichinella sp. Nevertheless, the zoonotic potential have been shown for most Trichinella species, hence, the golden jackal represents an important natural sylvatic reservoir for these nematodes [240].
Other nematodes
Various other groups of nematodes have been found in golden jackals (families Spirocercidae, Dracunculidae, Gnathostomatidae, Physalopteridae, Rictulariidae, Subuluridae), but the reports are occasional (Table 6). Other groups (Kalicephalus, Syphacia and Gongylonema) are with high probability pseudoparasites, originating in prey hosts.
Spirocerca lupi is a rare zoonotic nematode species also identified in golden jackals in Europe, central and southern Asia (Table 6). Although a single human infection has been reported [279], the jackal may represent a reservoir host that maintains the life-cycle of the parasite in a certain region. Two other species of the genus Spirocerca (S. arctica and S. sanguinolenta, both described from domestic dogs) have been also reported in jackals, but their taxonomic status and biology are unknown.
Dracunculus medinensis has been identified in the golden jackal from several central and southern Asian countries. Currently the disease in humans has been declared extinct in the vast majority of the countries, with only three (Chad, South Sudan and Ethiopia) reporting cases in 2016 [280]. Dogs are considered to be important reservoirs for human infection [155, 281, 282]. In 2016, more than 1000 dogs in Chad, 14 dogs in Ethiopia, and 11 dogs in Mali were reported with guinea-worm [280]. In this context, understanding the role of wild canids (including golden jackals) remains a crucial aspect in the management of the ongoing eradication campaign.
Another zoonotic species identified in golden jackals from tropical Asian countries (India, Bangladesh, Myanmar) is Gnathostoma spinigerum. Gnathostomiasis, a major food-borne parasitic zoonosis and a significant public health problem, is considered an emerging imported disease in Europe and a common human infection in central and South America, and Asia [283]. Domestic and wild mammals are the final hosts and numerous intermediate and paratenic hosts are the source for the human infection. The golden jackals maintain the sylvatic focus of the parasites and interfere with the domestic cycle, at least in several Asian countries (Table 6).
Various other carnivore-specific spirurids have been found in golden jackals (Physaloptera sibirica, Rictularia affinis, R. cahirensis and Oxynema linstowi), but the role of this host species in their natural cycle remains unknown.
The cosmopolitan species Dioctophyme renale causes a severe kidney destruction in the carnivore definitive hosts. Although with limited zoonotic importance, so far around 20 human cases have been reported [284]. American minks seem to be the main reservoirs of the parasite [257], but an increased prevalence is also recorded in other wild and domestic carnivores. In golden jackals, D. renale has been reported in Asia, where the prevalence ranged between 3.3–35.0% (Table 6). Interestingly, this wild canid has shown a twice higher prevalence than stray dogs in the same geographical region [110], demonstrating the role of the jackal in the development of parasite’s cycle in nature.
Trichuris vulpis has been found on various occasions in golden jackals in Europe and Asia (Table 6). The high prevalence of T. vulpis infection in golden jackals (10.0–36.3%) is in line with the value recorded in dogs originating from the same areas: 25% in India [285], 20% in Bulgaria [286] and 8.95% in Russia [264]. Although the prevalence of T. vulpis in domestic and wild canids is generally high, only around 60 human cases have been recorded [155].
Arthropods
A great variety of Arthropods have been found in golden jackals (Table 7) [287–328].
Table 7.
Arthropod parasites of the golden jackal, Canis aureus
Family | Species | Origin | Prevalence (%) | Frequency | Intensity (A, ♂, ♀, N, L)b |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class Arachnida | ||||||
Demodecidae | Demodex spp. | Israel | na | 1/1 | na | [287] |
Demodex canis | Russia | 3.3 | 5/150 | na | [53] | |
Demodex folliculorum | Bangladesh | na | na | na | [118] | |
Ixodidae | Amblyomma sp. | Nepal | na | na | na | [288] |
Amblyomma varanense (syn. Aponomma gervaisi lucasi) | India | na | na | na | [289] | |
Amblyomma variegatum | Haute-Volta | na | na | 7 N | [290] | |
Senegal | na | na | 54 L | [291] | ||
Dermacentor marginatus | Russia | 15.3 | 23/150 | 1–26 | [53] | |
Serbia | 45.0 | 9/20 | na | [292] | ||
Dermacentor reticulatus | Austria | na | 1/1 | 17 ♂; 2 ♀ | [56] | |
Hungary | na | 4/4 | 10 A | [293] | ||
Italy | na | 1/1 | na | [116] | ||
Romania | 12.6 | 10/79 | 46 ♂; 25 ♀ | [294] | ||
Russia | 62.0 | 93/150 | 1–26 | [53] | ||
Haemaphysalis sp. | Iran | 1.7 | 1/56 | na | [48, 295, 296] | |
Nepal | na | na | na | [288] | ||
Haemaphysalis adleri | Iraq | na | na | na | [297] | |
Israel | na | 2/2 | 4 ♂; 1 ♀ | [298] | ||
na | 3/3 | na | [299] | |||
Haemaphysalis bispinosa | India | na | na | na | [300] | |
Nepal | na | na | na | [288] | ||
Haemaphysalis canestrinii | India | na | 1/1 | 9 ♂; 3 ♀, | [301] | |
na | na | na | [300] | |||
Pakistan | na | 3/3 | 3 ♂; 1 ♀ | [301] | ||
Haemaphysalis concinna | Austria | na | 1/1 | 1 N | [56] | |
Hungary | na | 4/4 | 7 N; 4 L | [293] | ||
Romania | 1.2 | 1/79 | 1 N | [294] | ||
Haemaphysalis flava | India | na | na | A | [289] | |
Haemaphysalis indoflava | India | na | na | na | [302] | |
Haemaphysalis intermedia | India | na | 2/2 | 8 ♂; 17♀; 28 N; 13 L | [303] | |
na | na | na | [300] | |||
Haemaphysalis kutchensis | India | na | na | 10 ♂; 1 ♀ | [348] | |
Haemaphysalis leachii (syns H. leachii leachii, H. leachii indica) | Egypt (as H. leachii leachii) | na | na | na | [305] | |
India | na | 1/1 | 9 ♂; 3 ♀ | [306] | ||
India (as H. leachii indica) | na | na | na | [289] | ||
na | 2/2 | 7 ♂; 2♀; 4 N; 1 L | [307] | |||
Nepal (as H. leachii indica) | na | 3/3 | 6 N | [307] | ||
Haemaphysalis longicornis (syn. H. neumanni) | Ceylon | na | na | na | [308] | |
Haemaphysalis paraleachi | Sudan | 100 | 10/10 | 42 ♂; 4 ♀ | [309] | |
Haemaphysalis parva (syn. H. otophila) | India | na | na | na | [310] | |
Israel | na | 3/3 | na | [299] | ||
Israel (as H. otophila) | na | 6/6 | 37 | [311] | ||
Haemaphysalis punctata | Romania | na | 4/4 | na | [312] | |
2.5 | 2/79 | 1 ♂; 2 N | [294] | |||
Hyalomma sp. | Russia | 0.7 | 1/150 | 1 | [53] | |
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Hyalomma aegyptium | USSR (former) | na | na | na | [313] | |
Hyalomma anatolicum | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Hyalomma asiaticum | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Hyalomma scupense | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Ixodes sp. | Iran | na | 1/1 | na | [314] | |
Russia | na | na | na | [339] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Ixodes acuminatus (syn. I. redikorzevi theodori) | Israel | na | 6/6 | 1 | [311] | |
Ixodes canisuga | Hungary | na | 4/4 | 1 N | [293] | |
Ixodes hexagonus | Romania | 10.1 | 8/79 | 2 ♂; 11 ♀; 24 N; 12 L | [294] | |
Ixodes ovatus | Nepal | na | 1/1 | 6 ♀ | [315] | |
Ixodes ricinus | Hungary | na | 4/4 | 3 A | [293] | |
Iran | 3.5 | 2/56 | na | [48, 295, 296] | ||
Italy | na | 1/1 | na | [116] | ||
Romania | na | 1/1 | na | [316] | ||
na | 4/4 | na | [312] | |||
26.5 | 21/79 | 54 ♂; 45♀; 3 N; 4 L | [294] | |||
Russia | 68.7 | 103/150 | 1–62 | [53] | ||
Serbia | 55.0 | 11/20 | na | [292] | ||
Rhipicephalus sp. | Iran | 1.7 | 1/56 | na | [48, 295, 296] | |
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Rhipicephalus annulatus (syn. Boophilus calcaratus) | Russia | 1.3 | 2/150 | 1–2 | [53] | |
Rhipicephalus cuspidatus | Haute-Volta | na | na | na | [290] | |
Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides | India | na | na | na | [289] | |
na | 1/1 | 4 ♂ | [306] | |||
na | 2/2 | 1 ♀; 2 N | [303] | |||
na | na | na | [300] | |||
Nepal | na | na | na | [288] | ||
Rhipicephalus leporis | Iraq | na | na | na | [297] | |
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Rhipicephalus pumilio | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | [152] | ||
Rhipicephalus rossicus | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Rhipicephalus sanguineus | Algeria | na | 2/2 | 15 ♂; 8 ♀ | [317] | |
Burma, Ceylon, India | na | na | na | [289] | ||
India | na | na | na | [300] | ||
Iran | na | na | na | [314] | ||
Israel | na | 6/6 | na | [311] | ||
Nepal | na | na | na | [288] | ||
Nigeriaa | na | 3/6 | na | [41] | ||
Romania | na | 1/1 | na | [316] | ||
na | 4/4 | na | [312] | |||
1.2 | 1/79 | 1 ♂ | [294] | |||
Serbia | 0.5 | 1/20 | na | [292] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | [150] | ||
na | na | na | [318] | |||
Rhipicephalus schulzei | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Rhipicephalus simus | Kenya | na | na | na | [319] | |
Rhipicephalus sulcatus | Haute-Volta | na | na | 5 ♂ | [290] | |
Rhipicephalus turanicus | Iraq | na | na | na | [320] | |
100 | 14/14 | na | [297] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | [152] | ||
Psoroptidae | Otodectes cynotis | Iran | 1.7 | 1/56 | na | [48, 295, 296] |
Sarcoptidae | Sarcoptes scabiei | Israel | na | 1/1 | na | [287] |
Class Insecta | ||||||
Boopiidae | Heterodoxus spiniger | Africa (North, East); Asia (South); Europe (Southeast) | na | na | na | [321] |
Uganda | na | 1/1 | 1 ♂; 2 ♀ | [322] | ||
Ceratophyllidae | Paraceras melis | Russia | 10.0 | 15/150 | 1–12 | [53] |
3.3 | 5/150 | na | [323] | |||
Coptopsyllidae | Coptopsylla lamellifer dubinini | Uzbekistan | na | na | na | [152] |
Hippoboscidae | Hippobosca longipennis | Russia | 2.7 | 4/150 | 1–2 | [53] |
Linognathidae | Linognathus setosus | Afrotropical Region | na | na | na | [324] |
Nepal | na | na | na | [288] | ||
Pediculidae | Pediculus sp. | Bangladesh | na | na | na | [118] |
Pulicidae | Pulex irritans | Afghanistan | na | na | 2 ♂; 1 ♀ | [325] |
Iran | na | na | 3 ♂; 1 ♀ | [326] | ||
Israel | na | 6/6 | 36 | [311] | ||
Russia | 24.0 | 36/150 | 1–15 | [53] | ||
14.0 | 21/150 | na | [323] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | [152] | ||
Ctenocephalides canis | Afghanistan | na | na | 10 ♂; 38 ♀ | [325] | |
Iran | na | na | 13 ♂; 25 ♀ | [326] | ||
10.8 | 6/56 | na | [48, 295, 296] | |||
Israel | na | 4/6 | 27 | [311] | ||
Nigeriaa | na | 1/6 | na | [41] | ||
Russia | 48.0 | 72/150 | 1–28 | [53] | ||
17.3 | 30/150 | na | [323] | |||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Turkey | na | na | na | [150] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | [152] | ||
Ctenocephalides felis (syn. C. felis felis) | Ethiopia | na | na | na | [327] | |
India (as C. felis felis) | na | na | na | [328] | ||
Iran (as C. felis felis) | na | na | 2 ♂; 2 ♀ | [326] | ||
Israel | 50.0 | 3/6 | 6 | [311] | ||
Russia | 3.3 | 5/150 | 1–4 | [53] | ||
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Uzbekistan | na | na | na | [152] | ||
Echidnophaga gallinacea | Afghanistan | na | na | 1 ♂ | [325] | |
Ethiopia | na | na | na | [327] | ||
Xenopsylla nesokiae | Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | |
Trichodectidae | Trichodectes canis | Russia | 13.3 | 20/150 | 1–34 | [53] |
Tajikistan | na | na | na | [148] | ||
Vermipsyllidae | Chaetopsylla globiceps | Russia | 27.3 | 41/150 | 1–19 | [53] |
6.7 | 10/150 | na | [323] | |||
Class Maxillopoda | ||||||
Linguatulidae | Linguatula serrata | Romania | 1.3 | 1/73 | 1 ♂ | Our unpublished data |
Abbreviation: na not applicable/not available
aAnimals kept in captivity
bA, adults; ♂, male; ♀, female; N, nymphs; L, larvae
Ticks
Due to the large geographical range, the diversity of ticks parasitizing golden jackals is high. Ticks from 37 species belonging to six genera have been recorded in jackals throughout Europe, Asia and Africa. Nevertheless, the number of studies on tick-borne pathogens is surprisingly low. The common tick species found in golden jackals in Europe, i.e. Dermacentor reticulatus, D. marginatus, Haemaphysalis concinna, H. punctata, Ixodes canisuga, I. hexagonus, I. ricinus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.), show that they share these ticks with other wild canids, like foxes [329] or with domestic dogs [330]. The two most commonly reported ticks in golden jackals from Europe are D. reticulatus and I. ricinus. These ticks are known to be important vectors for Babesia canis and important tick-borne bacteria, Borrelia burgdorferi (s.l.) and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. However, the reports of these pathogens in C. aureus are scarce (a single report of Babesia canis from Romania [42]). In Asia, the most common ticks on jackals are several species of genus Haemaphysalis, with a high diversity of species reported: H. leachi, H. adleri, H. bispinosa, H. canestrinii, H. flava, H. indoflava, H. intermedia, H. kutchensis and H. parva. However, studies on the pathogens they might transmit are absent. Several of these Haemaphysalis species are shared with domestic dogs or other wild carnivores, raising the question of the reservoir role of jackals for certain tick-borne pathogens. Except for Haemaphysalis ticks, another commonly reported tick on golden jackals from Asia is Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides, a tick which prefers ungulates and known as vector of several viral and protozoan diseases [331]. Studies in golden jackals from arid regions (northern Africa and Middle East) demonstrated the predominant presence of ticks from the genus Rhipicephalus: R. sanguineus (s.l.), R. turanicus and R. leporis. Surprisingly, there are no reports of ticks on golden jackals in sub-Saharan Africa.
Mites
Compared to foxes, jackals seem to be less affected by mange-causing mites (Table 7). So far, there is a single report of Sarcoptes scabiei in golden jackals, in Israel [287] and a single report of Otodectes cynotis, in Iran [295]. It is unclear if the scarcity of data regarding Sarcoptes is because of the low prevalence or because of the lack of studies and/or reports. Except sarcoptid mites, there are few records of Demodex in golden jackals, but its clinical significance is not known (Table 7).
Fleas and lice
The diversity of fleas reported in golden jackals is relatively high, with at least seven species reported (Table 7), with the most common being Pulex irritans, Ctenocephalides canis and C. felis. Most of the reports of fleas in golden jackals originate in Russia and other former USSR countries and western and southern Asia. Surprisingly, there are no reports of fleas in golden jackals in Europe. The reports of lice in golden jackals are scarce with only three species occasionally reported (Table 7).
Other arthropods
Although relatively common in most wild carnivores and domestic dogs (Mihalca, personal observation), there is only a single report of Hippobosca longipennis in golden jackals (Table 7). This species is an important vector for Acanthocheilonema dracunculoides, a filarioid widely distributed in canids across Africa [332]. However, this vector-borne nematode was never reported in golden jackals.
Conclusions
This is the first comprehensive checklist summarizing the data on parasites of golden jackals. The large variety of parasites reported in golden jackals is caused by multiple factors, including their large geographical range, their extensive territorial mobility and wide food spectrum. Moreover, like in other carnivores, the predator behaviour of golden jackals is the cause of common records of pseudoparasites. Nevertheless, even in such cases, although these parasites do not infect jackals, they can be spread and can remain infective for their natural hosts. Considering that jackals share their habitats with domestic dogs and a wide variety of wild carnivores across their distribution range and the high similarity with canine parasites [333], the risk of interspecific transmission among canid species, and the continued spread of the species, is likely to be associated with future territorial expanding of different parasitic diseases. The vast majority of parasites recorded in golden jackals are shared with domestic dogs or even domestic cats. Other parasites of jackals can use a wide variety of other domestic species, including livestock, as intermediate hosts. Hence, jackals are an important source of infection for domestic animals and might be directly or indirectly responsible for economic losses. Probably the most important aspect regarding the parasites of golden jackal is the large number and common occurrence of zoonotic parasites. Among these, several are with high public health impact: Leishmania, Echinococcus, hookworms, Toxocara, and Trichinella. Our review brings overwhelming evidence on the importance of Canis aureus as wild reservoir of human parasites.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Cristian Domşa who generated the map of golden jackal distribution.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The data supporting the conclusions are provided within the article.
Authors’ contributions
CMG collected the information from databases, systematized information in tables and wrote the manuscript. ADM had the initial idea of this review and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Călin Mircea Gherman, Email: calin.gherman@usamvcluj.ro.
Andrei Daniel Mihalca, Email: amihalca@usamvcluj.ro.
References
- 1.Viranta S, Atickem A, Werdelin L, Stenseth NC. Rediscovering a forgotten canid species. BMC Zoology. 2017;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40850-017-0015-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jhala YV, Moehlman PD. Golden jackal Canis aureus Linnaeus, 1758. Least Concern (2004). In: Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffman M, DW MD, editors. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs: Gland: IUCN; 2004. p. 156–61.
- 3.Koepfli KP, Pollinger J, Godinho R, Robinson J, Lea A, Hendricks S, Schweizer RM, et al. Genome-wide evidence reveals that African and Eurasian golden jackals are distinct species. Curr Biol. 2015;25(16):2158–2165. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nagy J. Régibb és újabb adatok a nádifarkasok és a sakálok előfordulásairól. Nimród Vadászlap. 1942;30(35):554–556. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wozencraft WC. Order Carnivora. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM, editors. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005. pp. 532–629. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khalaf-Sakerfalke VJ, Taher NABA. Canis aureus palaestina Khalaf, 2008: a new golden jackal subspecies from the Gaza strip, Palestine. Gazelle Palestinian Biol Bul. 2008;80:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rueness EK, Asmyhr MG, Sillero-Zubiri C, Macdonald DW, Bekele A, Atickem A, Stenseth NC. The cryptic African wolf: Canis aureus lupaster is not a golden jackal and is not endemic to Egypt. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005;438:803–819. doi: 10.1038/nature04338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sommer R, Benecke N. Late-Pleistocene and early Holocene history of the canid fauna of Europe (Canidae) Mamm Biol. 2005;70:227–241. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2004.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trouwborst A, Krofel M, Linnell JDC. Legal implications of range expansions in a terrestrial carnivore: the case of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Europe. Biodivers Conserv. 2015;24:2593–2610. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0948-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Šálek M, Červinka J, Banea OC, Krofel M, Ćirovic´ D, Selanec I, Penezić A, Grill S, Riegert J. Population densities and habitat use of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) in farmlands across the Balkan peninsula. Eur J Wildl Res. 2014;60:193–200. doi: 10.1007/s10344-013-0765-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Giannatos G. Conservation action plan for the golden jackal (Canis aureus L., 1758) in Greece. Athens:WWF Greece; 2004.
- 13.Arnold J, Humer A, Heltai M, Murariu D, Spassov N, Hackländer K. Current status and distribution of golden jackals Canis aureus in Europe. Mamm Rev. 2012;42:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00185.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kryštufek B, Tvrtkovič N. Range expansion by Dalmatian jackal population in the twentieth century (Canis aureus L., 1758) Folia Zool. 1990;39:291–296. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nowak RM, Paradiso JL. Walker’s mammals of the world. 4. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Van Lawick H, Van Lawick-Goodall J. Innocent killers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1970. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kingdon J. East African mammals: an atlas of evolution in Africa, volume 3, Part A: Carnivores. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yakobson B, Manalo DL, Bader K, Perl S, Haber A. An epidemiological retrospective study of rabies diagnosis and control in Israel, 1948–1997. Isr J Vet Med. 1998;53:114–126. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shamir M, Yakobson B, Baneth G, King R, Dar-Verker S, Markovics A, Aroch I. Antibodies to selected canine pathogens and infestation with intestinal helminths in golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Israel. Vet J. 2001;162(1):66–72. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aguirre AA. Wild canids as sentinels of ecological health: a conservation medicine perspective. Parasit Vectors. 2009;(Suppl. 1):S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Rockville Pike. 2003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. Accessed 20 Sept 2016.
- 22.Science Direct. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 1997. http://www.sciencedirect.com/. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.
- 23.Web of Science. Institute for Scientific Information. New York: Thomson Reuters; 1964. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/. Accessed 1 Sept 2016.
- 24.Helminthological Abstracts. Wallingford: CABI; 1910. http://www.cabi.org/publishing-products/online-information-resources/helminthological-abstracts/. Accessed 27 July 2016.
- 25.Biological Abstracts . BIOSIS. New York: Thomson Reuters; 1926. [Google Scholar]
- 26.BioOne, Washington, DC. 1999. http://www.bioone.org/. Accessed 15 Sept 2016.
- 27.Host-Parasite Database. London: Natural History Museum; 1922. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/taxonomy-systematics/host-parasites/database/. Accessed 15 July 2016.
- 28.Scholar G. Bibliographic database. Mountain View: Google; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Scientific Electronic Library "Kiberleninka", Moscow. 2012. http://cyberleninka.ru. Accessed 1 July 2016.
- 30.Scientific Library Earth Papers. http://earthpapers.net/. Accessed 30 June 2016.
- 31.Adl SM, Simpson AG, Lane CE, Lukeš J, Bass D, Bowser SS, Brown MW, et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2012;59(5):429–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gibson DI, Jones A, Bray RA, editors. Keys to the Trematoda. Wallingford: CAB International; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jones E, Bray RA, Gibson DI, editors. Keys to the Trematoda. Wallingford: CAB International; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bray RA, Gibson DI, Jones A, editors. Keys to the Trematoda. Wallingford: CAB International; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kahlil LF, Jones A, Bray RA, editors. Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. Wallingford: CAB International; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nakao M, Lavikainen A, Iwaki T, Haukisalmi V, Konyaev S, Oku Y, Okamoto M, Ito A. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Taenia (Cestoda: Taeniidae): proposals for the resurrection of Hydatigera Lamarck, 1816 and the creation of a new genus Versteria. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(6):427–437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.De Ley P, Blaxter M. A new system for Nematoda: combining morphological characters with molecular trees, and translating clades into ranks and taxa. In: Cook R, Hunt DJ, editors. Nematology monographs and perspectives. Leiden: E.J. Brill; 2004. pp. 633–653. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Amin OM. Classification of the Acanthocephala. Folia Parasitol. 2013;60(4):273–305. doi: 10.14411/fp.2013.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Roskov Y, Abucay L, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Flann C, Bailly N, Kirk P, Bourgoin T, DeWalt RE, Decock W, De Wever A. (editors) 2016. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 28th July 2016. Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col. Species 2000: Naturalis, Leiden, the Netherlands ISSN 2405-8858. Accessed 11 August 2016.
- 40.Rau MAN. Experimental infection of the jackal (Canis aureus) with Piroplasma canis Prana & Gallivalerio, 1895. A preliminary note. Indian J Med Res. 1926;14:243–244. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mbaya AW, Aliyu MM, Nwosu CO, Ibrahim UI. Captive wild animals as potential reservoirs of haemo- and ectoparasitic infection of man and domestic animals in the arid-region of northeastern Nigeria. Vet Arhiv. 2008;78:429–40. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mitková B, Hrazdilová K, D’Amico G, Duscher GG, Suchentrunk F, Forejtek P, Gherman CM, et al. Eurasian golden jackal as host of canine vector-borne protists. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2110-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Maronpot RR, Guindy E. Preliminary study of Babesia gibsoni Patton in wild carnivores and domesticated dogs in Egypt. Am J Vet Res. 1970;31:797–799. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Patton WS. Preliminary report on a new piroplasm (“Piroplasma gibsoni” sp. nov.) found in the blood of hounds of the madras hunt and subsequently discovered in the blood of the jackal “Canis aureus”. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1910;3:271–281. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kirkova Z, Raychev E, Georgieva D. Studies on feeding habits and parasitological status of red fox, golden jackal, wild cat and stone marten in Sredna Gora. Bulgaria. J Life Sci. 2011;5:264–70. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bhatia BB, Chauhan PPS, Agrawal RD, Ahluwalia SS. Eimeria aurei n. sp. from jackal. Indian J Parasitol. 1979;3:49–50. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Latchumikanthan A, Vimalraj PG, Gomathinayagam S, Jayathangaraj MG. Concurrent infection of Nanophyetus (Troglotrema) salmincola, Ancylostoma sp. and Isospora sp. in a captive jackal (Canis aureus) J Vet Parasitol. 2012;26(1):87–88. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Razmjoo M, Bahrami AM, Shamsollahi M. Seroepidemiological survey of important parasitic infections of wild carnivores. IJABBR. 2014;2(3):783–792. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ilić T, Becskei Z, Petrović T, Polaček V, Ristić B, Milić S, et al. Endoparasitic fauna of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Serbia. Acta Parasitol. 2016;61(2):389–396. doi: 10.1515/ap-2016-0051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yakimoff WL, Matikaschwili IL, Rastegaieff EF. Zur Frage über die Coccidien der Schakale, Eimeria dutoiti n. sp. Arch Protistenkd. 1933;80:177–178. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Glebezdin VS. On the fauna of coccidia wild mammals Southwest Turkmenistan. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Turkmeniskoi SSR Seriya Biologicheskih Nauk. 1978;3:71–8. (In Russian).
- 52.Dzerzhinsky VA, Musabekov KS. Findings of coccidians of the genus Isospora (Coccidiida) in the Central Asian jackal. Parazitologiya. 1985;19(4):318–20. (In Russian). [PubMed]
- 53.Tulov AV. Parasitocenoses of jackal (Canis aureus L.) in ecosystems of the north-west Caucasus. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University, Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Biological Sciences; 2013. (In Russian).
- 54.Yakimoff WL, Lewkowitsch EN. Isospora theileri n. Sp., coccidie de Schakale. Arch Protistenkd. 1932;77:533–537. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Maia JP, Alvares F, Boratyński Z, Brito JC, Leite JV, Harris DJ. Molecular assessment of Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina) infections in wild canids and rodents from north Africa, with implications for transmission dynamics across taxonomic groups. J Wildl Dis. 2014;50(4):837–848. doi: 10.7589/2013-10-280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Duscher GG, Kübber-Heiss A, Richter B, Suchentrunk F. A golden jackal (Canis aureus) from Austria bearing Hepatozoon canis - import due to immigration into a non-endemic area? Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4(1–2):133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Duscher G, Ćirović D, Heltai M, Szabo L, Lanszki J, Bošković I, et al. Hepatozoonosis in golden jackals (Canis aureus) from southeastern and central Europe: prevalence data from a first molecular screening. Book of Abstracts of First International Jackal Symposium; Oct 13–16, 2014. Veliko Gradiste; 2014. pp. 70–1.
- 58.Farkas R, Solymosi N, Takács N, Hornyák Á, Hornok S, Nachum-Biala Y, Baneth G. First molecular evidence of Hepatozoon canis infection in red foxes and golden jackals from Hungary. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:303. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Takács A, Szabó L, Juhász L, Takács AA, Lanszki J, Takács PT, Heltai M. Data on the parasitological status of golden jackal (Canis aureus L., 1758) in Hungary. Acta Vet Hung. 2014;62(1):33–41. doi: 10.1556/AVet.2013.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Steinman A, Shpigel NY, Mazar S, King R, Baneth G, Savitsky I, Shkap V. Low seroprevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in wild canids in Israel. Vet Parasitol. 2006;137(1–2):155–158. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mukherjea AK, Krassner SM. A new species of coccidia (protozoa: Sporozoa) of the genus Isospora Schneider, 1881, from the jackal, Canis aureus Linnaeus. Proc Zool Soc Calcutta. 1965;18:35–40. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Levine ND, Tadros W. Named species and hosts of Sarcocystis (protozoa: Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) Syst Parasitol. 1980;2:41–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00015094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ghorbani M, Hafizi A, Shegerfcar MT, Rezaian M, Nadim A, Anwar M, Afshar A. Animal toxoplasmosis in Iran. J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;86(2):736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Namroodi S, Yousefi MR, Milanloo D. Toxoplasma gondii serosurvey in golden jackals from Golestan province, Iran. IJMCM. 2014;2:446–50. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Radhy AM, Khalaf JM, Faraj AA. Some gastro-intestinal protozoa of zoonotic importance observed in captive animals of al- Zawraa zoo in Baghdad. Int J Sci Nat. 2013;4(3):567–570. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Beck R, Sprong H, Lucinger S, Pozio E, Cacciò SM. A large survey of Croatian wild mammals for Giardia duodenalis reveals a low prevalence and limited zoonotic potential. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11(8):1049–1055. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chatteriee GC, Roy H, Mitra AN. Notes on Pentatrichomonas canis-auri n. sp., found in cecal contents of an Indian jackal (Canis aureus), its cultivation in vitro and its method of multiplication. J Dept Sc Calcutta Univ. 1926;8:11.
- 68.Hamidi AN, Nadim A, Edrissian GH, Tahvildar-Bidruni G, Javadian E. Visceral leishmaniasis of jackals and dogs in northern Iran. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1982;76(6):756–757. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90100-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ćirović D, Chochlakis D, Tomanović S, Sukara R, Penezić A, Tselentis Y, Psaroulaki A. Presence of Leishmania and Brucella species in the golden jackal Canis aureus in Serbia. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:728516. doi: 10.1155/2014/728516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hervás J, Méndez A, Carrasco L, Gómez-Villamandos JC. Pathological study of visceral leishmaniasis in a jackal (Canis aureus) Vet Rec. 1996;139(12):293–295. doi: 10.1136/vr.139.12.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Khan MAHNA, Khanm SS, Bashu J, Rima UK, Pervin M, Hossain MZ, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in golden jackals of Bangladesh agricultural university campus, a threat for expanding future zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. Bangl J Vet Med. 2012;10(1&2):101–109. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Maruashvili GM, Bardzhadze BG. New natural reservoir of Leishmania donovani in Georgia. Med Parazitol. 1980;6:77–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Musabekov KS, Novak MD, Farizova OM. Jackal as a potential source of leishmaniasis in the south-southeast of Kazakhstan. Math KazSSR Ser Biol Nauk. 1987;4:86–7. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nadim A, Navid-Hamidid A, Javadian E, Bidruni GT, Amini H. Present status of kala-azar in Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(1):25–28. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1978.27.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jarallah HM. Dissemination of canine visceral leishmaniasis to different organs of jackals experimentally infected with Leishmania donovani. Pak Vet J. 2015;35(1):98–100. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bessad A, Mouloua K, Kherrachi I, Benbetka S, Benikhlef R, Mezai G, Harrat Z. Leishmania infantum MON-1 isolated from a golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Grande Kabylie (Algeria). Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2012;105(1):5–7. (In French). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 77.Babuadze G, Alvar J, Argaw D, de Koning HP, Iosava M, Kekelidze M, Tsertsvadze N, et al. Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Georgia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(3):e2725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mohebali M, Arzamani K, Zarei Z, Akhoundi B, Hajjaran H, Raeghi S, Heidari Z, et al. Canine visceral leishmaniasis in wild canines (fox, jackal, and wolf) in northeastern Iran using parasitological, serological, and molecular methods. J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 2015;10(4):538–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Niazi AD. Studies in epidemiology and seroepidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Iraq. Doctoral thesis. London: London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine, 1980. doi:10.17037/PUBS.00682256.
- 80.Baneth G, Dank G, Keren-Kornblatt E, Sekeles E, Adini I, Eisenberger CL, Schnur LF, King R, Jaffe CL. Emergence of visceral leishmaniasis in central Israel. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59(5):722–725. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Talmi-Frank D, Kedem-Vaanunu N, King R, Bar-Gal GK, Edery N, Jaffe CL, Baneth G. Leishmania tropica infection in golden jackals and red foxes. Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(12):1973–5. doi: 10.3201/eid1612.100953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lubova VV. Study of Kzyl-Orda foci. Communication 1 and 2. Voprosy Medizinskykh i Biologicheskykh Issledovaniy, Moskva. 1972;49–52 (In Russian).
- 83.Latyshev NI, Kryukova AP, Povalishina TP. Essays on the regional parasitology of Middle Asia. I. Leishmaniasis in Tajikistan. Materials for the medical geography of Tadjik SSR. (Results of expeditions in 1945–1+7). Problems of Regional, General and Experimental Parasit Med Zoo., Moscow. 1951;7:35–62. (In Russian).
- 84.Dursunova SM, Ponirovskii EN, Afanasiev NP. Possible role of wild animals in epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Turkmen SSR. Trudy Ashkhabadskogo Inst Epidem i Gig. 1964;6:157–8. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jarallah HM. Experimental innoculation of jackals with Leishmania major and their susceptibility by histopathological lesions. Indian Vet J. 2015;92(1):90–91. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mircean V, Dumitrache MO, Mircean M, Bolfă P, Györke A, Mihalca AD. Autochthonous canine leishmaniasis in Romania: neglected or (re)emerging? Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:135. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Espejo LA, Costard S, Zagmutt FJ. Modelling canine leishmaniasis spread to non-endemic areas of Europe. Epidemiol Infect. 2014;27:1–14. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814002726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sasaki M, Omobowale O, Tozuka M, Ohta K, Matsuu A, Nottidge HO, et al. Molecular survey of Babesia canis in dogs in Nigeria. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69(11):1191–1193. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Alvarado-Rybak M, Solano-Gallego L, Millán J. A review of piroplasmid infections in wild carnivores worldwide: importance for domestic animal health and wildlife conservation. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1808-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Baneth G. Perspectives on canine and feline hepatozoonosis. Vet Parasitol. 2011;181(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Duszynski DW, Couch L, Upton SJ. Coccidia (Eimeriidae) of Canidae and Felidae. Supported by NSF-PEET DEB 9521687. 2000. http://biology.unm.edu/coccidia/carniv1.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2017.
- 92.McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM. Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol. 1998;28:1473–1478. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00138-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gondim LF, McAllister MM, Pitt WC, Zemlicka DE. Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:159–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.King JS, Slapeta J, Jenkins DJ, Al-Qassab SE, Ellis JT, Windsor PA. Australian dingoes are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:945–950. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Rajendran C, Miska K, Ferreira LR, Martins J. Gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a natural definitive host for Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol. 2011;181:382–387. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gadzhiev IG, Ataev AM, Gazimagomedov MG. Fauna of helminthes of domestic and wild Сanidae in the plane zone of Dagestan. Russian J Parasitol. 2010;4:12–5. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Atalay MM. The main helminth infections of wild carnivores and principles of prevention in Dagestan offensive. Vet Pathol Moscow. 2010;2(33):5–10. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hajiyev IG. Helminthiases of dogs in the territory of the Terek-Kuma Lowland and improvement of control measures. Thesis for the degree of candidate of veterinary sciences. Makhachkala 2011, pp. 148.
- 99.Fataliyev GG. Helminthofauna of wild dogs in Azerbaijan and the ways of its formation. Parasitologyia. 2011;45(2):129–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ibrahimova RS, Fataliyev GH. Current state of helminthofauna of canids (Canidae) in Azerbaijan. Proc Azerbaijan Natnl Acad Sci Biological Med Sci. 2015;70(1):35–8. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Trifonov T, Meskov S, Stoimenov K. Helminth fauna of the jackal (Canis aureus) in the Strandzha Mountains. Vet Med Nauki. 1970;7(6):51–4. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Florijančić T, Ozimec S, Bošković I, Degmečić D, Urošević B, Nekvapil N, et al. Survey on sylvatic parasitosis in Podunavlje Region of Croatia. In: Popović Z, Beuković M, Dordević M, Beuković D, et al., editors. Proceedings of International symposium on hunting “Modern aspects of sustainable management of game population”. Zemun: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture; 2012. pp. 118–121. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Shahba HK. Hookworm and uncinariosis of carnivores. Ivanovo: Thesis for the degree of candidate of veterinary sciences; 2010 (In Russian).
- 104.Papadopoulos H, Himonas C, Papazahariadou M, Antoniadou-Sotiriadou K. Helminths of foxes and other wild carnivores from rural areas in Greece. J Helminthol. 1997;71(3):227–231. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X00015960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Dalimi A, Mobedi I. Helminth parasites of carnivores in northern Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1992;86(4):395–397. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1992.11812683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Itin GS, Kravchenko VM. Ecological-faunistic characteristics of helminthcoenosis of jackals (Canis aureus) at the Krasnodar Territory. Theory Pract of Parasitic Dis Animals-Biology. 2011;12:224–7. (In Russian).
- 107.Kruchkova EN. Helminth fauna of carnivores in the European region of Russia. Theory Pract Parasitic Dis Animals. 2012;13:205–8. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ćirović D, Pavlović I, Penezić A, Kulišić Z, Selaković S. Levels of infection of intestinal helminth species in the golden jackal Canis aureus from Serbia. J Helminthol. 2015;89(1):28–33. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X13000552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Shakarboev EB. The trematodes of vertebrates in Uzbekistan (species composition, ways of circulation and ecological-biological peculiarities). Tashkent: Abstract of Doct thesis; 2009 (In Russian).
- 110.Sadighian A. Helminth parasites of stray dogs and jackals in Shahsavar area, Caspian region. Iran J Parasitol. 1969;55(2):372–374. doi: 10.2307/3277413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Dalimi A, Sattari A, Motamedi G. A study on intestinal helminthes of dogs, foxes and jackals in the western part of Iran. Vet Parasitol. 2006;142(1–2):129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Chowdhury N. Indian subcontinent. In: Chowdhury N, Alonso Aguirre A, editors. Helminths of wildlife. Enfield: Science Publishers Inc; 2001. pp. 287–371. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Wells WH, Randal BH. New hosts for trematodes of the genus Heterophyes in Egypt. J Parasitol. 1956;42(3):287–292. doi: 10.2307/3274854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Rodonaya TE. On the detection of the USSR fluke Dexiogonimus ciureanus Witenberg, 1929. Helminthofauna of animals and plants in Georgia: Collection Institute of Zoology, Tbilisi. 1967;95–97 (In Russian).
- 115.Massoud J, Jalali H, Reza M. Studies on trematodes of the family Heterophyidae (Odhner, 1914) in Iran: 1. Preliminary epidemiological surveys in man and carnivores in Khuzestan. J Helminthol. 1981;55(4):255–260. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X00027851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lapini L, Molinari P, Dorigo L, Are G, Beraldo P. Reproduction of the golden jackal (Canis aureus moreoticus i. Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, 1835) in Julian pre-Alps, with new data on its range-expansion in the high-Adriatic hinterland (Mammalia, Carnivora, Canidae). Boll Mus Civ St Nat Venezia. 2009;60:169–86.
- 117.Rao BV. Helminth parasites from an Indian jackal (Canis aureus narid): Ancylostoma braziliense (Gomez 1910) Leiper 1915, Rictularia affinis (Jagerskiold, 1904) (Nematoda): and Spelotrema narii n. sp. (Trematoda). Ind J Helminthol. 1965;17:6884.
- 118.Yousuf MA, Bashu J, Pervin M, Islam MT, Das PM, Khan MAHNA. Identifying diseases of golden jackals of Bangladesh Agricultural University campus, Mymensingh. Bangladesh. Bangl J Vet Med. 2014;12(2):217–24. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Vimalraj PG, Latchumikanthan A. Schistosoma spindale infection in a captive jackal (Canis aureus) J Parasit Dis. 2015;39(1):120–121. doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0292-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Roberts L, Janovy J., Jr . Foundations of parasitology. 8. New York: McGraw Hill Publishers; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 121.Olsen OW. Animal parasites: their life cycles and ecology. New York: Dover Publications; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Filimonova LV. Experimental study of the biology of Nanophyetus schikhobalowi Skryabin & Podyapolskaya, 1931 (Trematoda, Nanophyetidae). Trudy Gel’mintologicheskoi Laboratorii. 1965;15:172–84. (In Russian).
- 123.Möhl K, Grosse K, Hamedy A, Wüste T, Kabelitz P, Lücker E. Biology of Alaria spp. and human exposition risk to Alaria mesocercariae - a review. Parasitol Res. 2009;105(1):1–15. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 124.Chai JY, Seo BS, Lee SH, Hong SJ, Sohn WM. Human infections by Heterophyes heterophyes and H. dispar imported from Saudi Arabia. Korean J Parasitol. 1986;24(1):82–6. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 125.Uppal B, Wadhwa V. Rare case of Metagonimus yokogawai. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005;23(1):61–62. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.13878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Cengiz ZT, Yilmaz H, Dulger AC, Cicek M. Human infection with Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Turkey. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30(2):159–161. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.60525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Khamidullin RI, Liubina VS, Khamidullin IR, Medinskiĭ BL. Trematodiases in Tataria. Med Parazitol (Moscow). 1991;2:60–1. (In Russian). [PubMed]
- 128.Dawes B. The Trematoda, with special reference to British and other European forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1968. [Google Scholar]
- 129.Gorman AM. Studies on the biology of Plagiorchis elegans (Rudolphi, 1802), (Trematoda: Digenea) in its mammalian and molluscan hosts. Leeds: PhD Thesis, University of Leeds. 1980.
- 130.Sitko J, Bizos J, Sherrard-Smith E, Stanton DW, Komorová P, Heneberg P. Integrative taxonomy of European parasitic flatworms of the genus Metorchis Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Opisthorchiidae) Parasitol Int. 2016;65(3):258–267. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Kumar V. Trematode infections and diseases of man and animals. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gupta V, Parmar S. On two new species of cestodes of the families Hymenolepididae and Dilepididae from mammals of India. Indian J Helminthol. 1989;40(2):165–171. [Google Scholar]
- 133.Gawande P, Baviskar B, Umale N, Gandhe A, Baviskar P, Bawaskar S, Maske DK. Survey of gastrointestinal helminths in captive mammals and birds at Maharajbagh Zoo. Nagpur Zoo's Print J. 2010;25(4):21–2. [Google Scholar]
- 134.Shaikh H, Huq MM, Karim MJ, Khan MMM. Indicence of helminth parasites of domestic and wild cats and jackals in Bangladesh. Indian J Parasitol. 1982;6(2):245–247. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Niphadkar SM, Narsapur VS, Deshpande VS, Nehete RS. Parasitic infections of zoo animals in Bombay. J Bombay Vet Col. 1989;1(1):37–40. [Google Scholar]
- 136.Farahnak A, Mobedi I, Mohamadi F. Study of zoonotic helminths of carnivores in Khuzestan, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 1998;27(3–4):15–20. [Google Scholar]
- 137.Litvinov VF, Litvinov VP. Helminths of carnivores in East Azerbaijan. Parazitologiya. 1981;15(3):219–23. [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sonsino P. Studi e notizie elmintologiche. Atti Soc Tosc Sc Nat. Proc Verb. 1889;6:224–237. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Meshgi B, Eslami A, Bahonar AR, Kharrazian-Moghadam M, Gerami-Sadeghian A. Prevalence of parasitic infections in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2009;10/4(29):387–391. [Google Scholar]
- 140.Lahmar S, Boufana B, Ben Boubaker S, Landolsi F. Intestinal helminths of golden jackals and red foxes from Tunisia. Vet Parasitol. 2014;204(3–4):297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Kirkova Z, Georgieva D, Raychev E. Study on the prevalence of trichurosis in different categories of dogs and wild carnivores. Bulg J Vet Med. 2006;9(2):141–147. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kamenov Y, Kanchev K, Radev V. Study on the helminth infection in canids in North-West Bulgaria. Sofia: Proceedings of Anniversary Conference of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Forestry; 2009. p. 298–303.
- 143.Ray DK, Negi SK, Srivastava PS. Occurrence of helminth parasites of zoonotic nature in wildlife in the Tarai. Indian J Anim Res. 1975;92:75–8. [Google Scholar]
- 144.Patel PV, Patel AI, Sabapara RH, Sahu RK, Vyas R. Helminthic infection in wild canids in zoological gardens of Gujarat. Zoo's Print J. 2003;18(4):1084. doi: 10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.18.4.1084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Arbabi M, Doroudgar A, Hooshyar H, Mobedi I. A survey of cestode infections of carnivores in the Kashan region. A survey on carnivore’s cestodes contamination in Kashan region. J Vet Res. 2004;59(3):289–293. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Hoida G, Greenberg Z, Furth M, Malsha Y, Craig PS, Schantz PM, Sneir R, El-on J. An epidemiological survey of Echinococcus granulosus and other helminths in animal populations in northern Israel. J Helminthol. 1998;72(2):127–131. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X00016308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Musabekov KS. [Diseases and parasites of jackal (Canis aureus L., 1758) from South Kazakhstan.] Proceedings of the NAS RK, ser. biological and medical. 2008;3:10–13 (In Russian).
- 148.Chernyshev VI. [On the ecology and parasites of the jackal in Tadzhikistan.] Trudy Akademii Nauk Tadzhikskoy SSR Dushanbe. 1954;21:151 (In Russian).
- 149.Lahmar S, Boufana BS, Lahmar S, Inoubli S, Guadraoui M, Dhibi M, et al. Echinococcus in the wild carnivores and stray dogs of northern Tunisia: the results of a pilot survey. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009;103(4):323–31. doi: 10.1179/136485909X440836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Merdivenci A. Yabanıl Hayvanlarda Pazarizolojik Araştırmalar. Izmir: Proceedings of The 6th National Congress of Biology; 1968. pp 81–101.
- 151.Irgashev IK. [The helminth fauna of domestic and wild carnivores in the Samarkand region.] Uzbekskii Biologicheskii Zhurnal. 1958;5:39–45 (In Russian).
- 152.Tariannikov T. [Parasites of the jackal (Canis aureus aureus) from the region of middle Syr Daria.] Parazitologiya. 1983;17(6):478–480 (In Russian).
- 153.Baer JG. The origin of human tapeworms. J Parasitol. 1940;26(2):127–134. doi: 10.2307/3272379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Turner JA. Human dipylidiasis (dog tapeworm infection) in the United States. J Pediatr. 1962;61:763–768. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(62)80352-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Acha PN, Szyfres B. Zoonoses and communicable diseases common to man and animals. Volume 3. Parasitoses. 3rd ed. Washington DC: PAHO (Pan American Health Organization [PAHO]). Scientific and Technical Publication No. 580; 2003.
- 156.Dhaliwal BBS, Juyal PD. Parasitic zoonoses. New Delhi: Springer; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 157.Deplazes P, Rinaldi L, Alvarez Rojas CA, Torgerson PR, Harandi MF, Romig T, et al. Global distribution of alveolar and cystic echinococcosis. Adv Parasitol. 2017;95:315–493. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Romig T, Bilger B, Mackenstedt U. Current spread and epidemiology of Echinococcus multilocularis. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1999;106(8):352–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Bacigalupo J. Sobre una nueva especie de Taenia, Taenia infantis. Semana Med. 1922;26:726.
- 160.Morishita K, Sawada I. On tapeworms of the genus Multiceps hitherto unrecorded from man. Jap J Parasitol. 1966;15:495–501. [Google Scholar]
- 161.Spassky AA, Spasskaia LP, Reznik VN. On the biological polyvalence of Hydatigera taeniaeformis and its occurrence in man. Med Parazitol Mosk. 1968;37(3):339–43. (In Russian). [PubMed]
- 162.Sterba J, Barus V. First record of Strobilocercus fasciolaris (Taeniidae-larvae) in man. Folia Parasitol. 1976;23:221–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Hoberg EP, Ebinger W, Render JA. Fatal cysticercosis by Taenia crassiceps (Cyclophyllidea: Taeniidae) in a presumed immunocompromised canine host. J Parasitol. 1999;85:1174–1178. doi: 10.2307/3285685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Slais J. Befunde von fruhen Entwicklungsstadien des Cysticercus in der Liber des Menschen. Zbl allg Path path Anat. 1965;108:316–321. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Sadykov VM. [Epizootiological and epidemiological significance of Cysticercus ovis.] Sb Rab Gel’mintologii Izdatel‘stvo “Kolos”. 1971;344–350 (In Russian).
- 166.Beugnet E, Gevrey J, Messouak A. The Cysticercus ovis cysticercosis: a non zoonotic muscular cysticercosis. Rev Med Vet. 1996;147(7):547–552. [Google Scholar]
- 167.Ing MB, Schantz PM, Turner JA. Human coenurosis in North America: case reports and review. Clinic Infect Dis. 1998;27:519–523. doi: 10.1086/514716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Nguyen MT, Gabriël S, Abatih EN, Dorny P. A systematic review on the global occurrence of Taenia hydatigena in pigs and cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2016;226:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Heyneman D. Cestodes. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th. Galveston: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Yoon KC, Seo MS, Park SW, Park YG. Eyelid sparganosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;2004(138):5–873. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Cho JH, Lee KB, Yong TS, Kim BS, Park HB, Ryu KN. Subcutaneous and musculoskeletal sparganosis: imaging characteristics and pathologic correlation. Skelet Radiol. 2000;29:402–408. doi: 10.1007/s002560000206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Dick TA, Nelson PA, Choudhury A. Diphyllobothriasis: update on human cases, foci, patterns and sources of human infections and future considerations. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001;32(2):59–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Bowman DB, Hendrix CM, Lindsay DS, Barr SC. Feline clinical parasitology. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 174.Borkowski J, Zalewski A, Manor R. Diet composition of golden jackals in Israel. Ann Zool Fennici. 2011;48:108–118. doi: 10.5735/086.048.0203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Nadeem MS, Naz R, Shah SI, Beg MA. Season- and locality-related changes in the diet of Asiatic jackal (Canis aureus) in Potohar, Pakistan. Turk J Zool. 2012;36(6):798–805.
- 176.Radović A, Kovačić D. Diet composition of the golden jackal (Canis aureus L.) on the Peljeac Peninsula, Dalmatia, Croatia. Period Biol. 2010;112(2):219–24.
- 177.Babaev Y. Data on the helminth fauna of wild mammals in the Karakumskii Canal zone. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Turkmenskoi SSR. Biol Nauk. 1976;4:68–74. [Google Scholar]
- 178.Zariffard MR. Study on helminth parasites of carnivores of East Azerbaijan Province of Iran with focus on Echinococcus multilocularis and its importance in public health. Tehran: University of Tehran, Doctor of Philosophy dissertation; 1994.
- 179.Arbabi M, Droudgar A, Houshyar H, Mobedi E. Prevalence of Macracanthorhynchus hirudinaceus in Caniidae in Kashaniran. Vet J (Tehran) 2002;15(2):55–57. [Google Scholar]
- 180.Nabavi R, Hajinezhad M, Jamshidian A. Detection of Pachysentis canicola (Acanthocephala: Oligacanthorhynchida) in Iranian golden jackal, Sistan, Iran. IJAPBS. 2015;4(8):70–2.
- 181.Elchuev MS. A first finding of Centrorhynchus itatsinis Fukui, 1929 in a jackal in the Azerbaijan SSR. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Azerbaĭdzhanskoĭ SSR. Biologicheskikh Nauk. 1986;6:47–51. (In Russian).
- 182.Varadharajan A, Pythal C. Parasites of wildlife - I. A preliminary investigation on the parasites of wild animals at the zoological Farden, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Zoo's Print J. 1999;14(3–12):159–64. doi: 10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.14.12.159-64. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Varadharajan A, Kandasamy A. A survey of gastro-intestinal parasites of wild animals in captivity in the V.O.C. Park and mini zoo, Coimbatore. Zoo's Print J. 2000;15(5):257–8. doi: 10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.15.5.257-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Ghoke SS, Naikwade BS, Thorat KS, Jogdand NK, Kalaskar PS. Incidence of helminthic infection in captive carnivores of Sidhharth municipal zoo, Aurangabad, Maharashtra. Zoos Print J. 2012;27(3):25–6. [Google Scholar]
- 185.Javaregowda AK. Studies on prevalence of endo-parasitic infection in wild carnivores maintained under captive state. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40(4):1155–1158. doi: 10.1007/s12639-014-0640-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Myers BJ, Kuntz RE, Wells WH. Helminth parasites of reptiles, birds, and mammals in Egypt: VII. Check list of nematodes collected from 1948 to 1955. Can J Zool. 1962;40(4):531–538. doi: 10.1139/z62-045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Baylis MA. Nematoda. Vol. II. (Filarioidea, Dioctophymoidea and Trichinelloidea) London: Taylor and Francis; 1939. Sewell RBS, editor. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. [Google Scholar]
- 188.Gupta NK, Kalia DC. Remarks on two already known nematode parasites from an Indian jackal. Res Bull Panjab Univ Sci. 1988;39(34):227–231. [Google Scholar]
- 189.Nashiruddullah N, Chakraborty A. Parasites of captive wild carnivores of Assam state zoo. Intas Polivet. 2001;2:173–181. [Google Scholar]
- 190.Singh T, Gupta MP, Singla LD, Singh N, Sharma DR. Prevalance and chemotherapy of gastrointestinal helminthic infections in wild carnivores of Mahendra Choudhury Zoological Park. Punjab. J Vet Parasitol. 2006;20(1):17–23. [Google Scholar]
- 191.Gupta NK, Kalia DC. Two new species of Ancylostoma (Nematoda) along with a key to the species of the genus possessing three pairs of ventral teeth. Rev Iber Parasitol. 1984;44(4):337–346. [Google Scholar]
- 192.Barus V, Kullmann E, Tenora F. Parasitische nematoden aus wirbeltieren Afghanistans. Acta Sci Nat Brno. 1972;6:1–46. [Google Scholar]
- 193.Yanchev Y. Morphology, taxonomy and distribution of species of Uncinaria (Frölich, 1789) from carnivores in Bulgaria. Khelmintologiya. 1986;22:55–66. [Google Scholar]
- 194.Merdivenci A, Buyurman Ü. Turkiye'de çakalda Uncinariasis olgusu. Turk Biol Derg. 1966;15(1–2):52–59. [Google Scholar]
- 195.Movsessian SO, Manassian JS, Hovhannissian RL. Specific composition of animal helminths in the Yerevan Zoo. Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR. Institute of Zoology. Zoological Papers. 1987;21:81–97. (In Russian).
- 196.Pradhan S, Sharma D, Subba B, Chettri V. Preliminary investigation on the parasites of mammals at Padmaja Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park. Darjeeling. Zoo's Print J. 2011;26(8):11–3. [Google Scholar]
- 197.Thawait VK, Maiti SK, Dixit AA. Prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites in captive wild animals of Nandan Van Zoo, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Vet World. 2014;7(7):448–51. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2014.448-451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Kalia DG, Nayital AK. A new subspecies record of Kalicephalus Molin, 1861 (Nematoda: Diaphanocephaloidea) from jackal; hitherto a cosmopolitan parasite of snakes. Indian J Parasitol. 1989;13:135–138. [Google Scholar]
- 199.Guilhon J. Transmission d'Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) aux canides sauvages. Compt Rend Hebd Seanc Acad Sci Paris. 1965;261(21):4496–7. [PubMed]
- 200.Panayotova-Pencheva M, Trifonova A, Mirchev R, Movsesyan S. Diversity and morphometric data of blood filarial larvae in carnivorous from Bulgaria. Rossiĭskiĭ Parazitologicheskiĭ Zhurnal. 2014;1:14–23. [Google Scholar]
- 201.Nelson GS. Dipetalonema reconditum (Grassi, 1889) from the dog with a note on its development in the flea, Ctenocephalides felis and the louse, Heterodoxus spiniger. J Helminthol. 1962;36(03):297–308. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X00023968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Kirkova Z., Ivanov A., Georgieva D. Dirofilariosis in dogs and wild carnivores in Bulgaria. In: Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, editors. Mappe Parassitologiche 8 “Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens in dog and cat and human Infections”. Zagreb: Rolando Editore; 2007. p. 204.
- 203.Panayotova-Pencheva MS, Mirchev RL, Trifonova AP. Dirofilaria immitis infection in carnivores from Bulgaria: 2012–2013 update. Bulg J Vet Med. 2016;19(2):153–62. doi: 10.15547/bjvm.918. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Diakou A, Migli D, Spiridakis G. Dirofilaria immitis (heartworm) in a golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Greece. In: Poulakakis N, Antoniou A, Karameta E, Psonis N, Vardinoyannis K, editors. Book of abstracts, 13th International Congress on the Zoogeography and Ecology of Greece and Adjacent Regions, University of Crete. Irakleio Hellenic Zoological Society; 2015 p. 27.
- 205.Tolnai Z, Széll Z, Sproch Á, Szeredi L, Sréter T. Dirofilaria immitis: an emerging parasite in dogs, red foxes and golden jackals in Hungary. Vet Parasitol. 2014;203(3–4):339–342. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Rao AT, Acharjyo LN. Incidence of heartworm in captive wild carnivores. Indian J Parasitol. 1993;17:201–202. [Google Scholar]
- 207.Meshgi B, Eslami A, Helan JA. Epidemiological survey of blood filariae in rural and urban dogs of Tabriz. J Fac Vet Med Tehran Univ. 2002;57(4):59–63. [Google Scholar]
- 208.Heidari Z, Kia EB, Arzamani K, Sharifdini M, Mobedi I, Zarei Z, Kamranrashani B. Morphological and molecular identification of Dirofilaria immitis from jackal (Canis aureus) in North Khorasan, northeast Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 2015;52(4):329–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Ionică AM, Matei IA, D'Amico G, Daskalaki AA, Juránková J, Ionescu DT, et al. Role of golden jackals (Canis aureus) as natural reservoirs of Dirofilaria spp. in Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1524-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Penezić A, Selaković S, Pavlović I, Ćirović D. First findings and prevalence of adult heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) in wild carnivores from Serbia. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(9):3281–3285. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3991-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Agrawal RD, Ahluwalia SS, Chauhan PPS. Occurrence of aortic spirocercosis in jackal. Indian J Anim Sci. 1986;56:402–403. [Google Scholar]
- 212.Islam S, Nashiruddullah N. Spirocerca lupi in a wild jackal (Canis aureus) from Assam. J Vet Parasitol. 2000;14(2):127128. [Google Scholar]
- 213.Acharya SK. Incidence of helminth parasites in indigenous dogs and jackals with special reference to hookworms. Indian Vet J. 1939;16:7–9. [Google Scholar]
- 214.Varadharajan A, Pythal C, Subramanian H. Investigation on the prevalence of helminth parasites of wild mammals in the Thrissur Zoo, Kerala. Cheiron. 2001;B:12–15.
- 215.Mihalca AD, Ionică AM, D'Amico G, Daskalaki AA, Deak G, Matei IA, et al. Thelazia callipaeda in wild carnivores from Romania: new host and geographical records. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1628-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Sadighian A, Amini F. Dioctophyma renale (Goeze, 1782) stiles, 1901 in stray dogs and jackals in Shahsavar area, Caspian region. Iran J Parasitol. 1967;53(5):961. doi: 10.2307/3276817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Asatrian AM. Spread and specific composition of Trichinella in Armenia. Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR. Institute of Zoology. Zoological Papers. 1987;21:34–40. [Google Scholar]
- 218.Bessonov AS. Trichinellosis in the former USSR. Epidemic situation (1988–1992) In: Campbell WC, Pozio E, Bruschi F, editors. Trichinellosis. Rome: Istituto Superiore di Sanità Press; 1994. pp. 505–510. [Google Scholar]
- 219.Sadikhov IA, Elchuev MS. [The situation for trichinosis in Sheki-Zagatala region of Azerbaijan.] Proceedings of the 7th All-Russia Conf for trichinosis, Moscow. 1996. p. 72–73 (In Russian).
- 220.Guenov G, Boeva V, Georgieva M, Bankov D, Stoimenov K. Organization and results of trichinellosis control in Bulgaria. In: Kim CW, Ruitenberg EJ, Teppema JS, editors. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Trichinellosis. Surrey: Reedbooks; 1981. pp. 387–389. [Google Scholar]
- 221.Georgieva D, Koinarski VT, Ivanov AI, Prelesov PN, Kirkova ZT. Role of wild carnivores in the epizootology and epidemiology of trichinellosis. Bulg J Vet Med. 2000;3(4):199–204. [Google Scholar]
- 222.Zelyazkov P, Todev I, Ivanov L, Mirchev R, Lalkovski N. Epizootological studies on trichinelosis (Trichinella sp.) among wild carnivores in Bulgaria. In: Proceedings. Traditional and contemporary veterinary medicine, Bulgaria, 2009. Sofia: Lesotekhnicheski Universitet; 2009. p. 335–40. (In Bulgarian).
- 223.Marian I, Mihalca AD, Gherman CM. Prevalence of Trichinella spp. infection in large wild carnivore species from Romania between Jan 2014 and July 2015. Bulletin UASVM Vet Med. 2015;72(2):438–440. [Google Scholar]
- 224.Sapunov AY, Andryushchenko VG. Spreading of trichinellosis among domestic and wild animals in Krasnodar territory. Moscow: Kirov; 1992. Proceedings of the 6th Scientific Conference on Trichinellosis; pp. 177–179. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Ozeretskovskaya NN, Mikhailova LG, Sabgaida TP, Dovgalev AS. New trends and clinical patterns of human trichinellosis in Russia at the beginning of the XXI century. Vet Parasitol. 2005;132:167–171. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Kushnarev JV. [Epizootology, epidemiology and improvement measures against trichinosis in the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania.] Abstract of the Dissertation for the degree of candidate of Biological Sciences, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Helminthology “KN Skryabiia”, Moscow; 2007 (In Russian).
- 227.Odoevskaia IM, Kurnosova OP, Klinkov AV, Bocharova MM. Biological properties of the isolate of Trichinella spp. from a jackal in the North Caucasian Region. Med Parazitol (Moscow). 2009;4(3):326. (In Russian). [PubMed]
- 228.Komardin HK, Didkovskaya LF. Trichinosis in Tajikistan. Health Tajikistan. 1985;6:46–9. [Google Scholar]
- 229.Boonthanom P, Nawarat A. The outbreaks of trichinosis at Amphur Mae Sarialng. Bull Pub Health. 1963;33:301–308. [Google Scholar]
- 230.Doege TC, Thienprasit P, Headington JT, Pongprot B, Tarawanich S. Trichinosis and raw bear meat in Thailand. Lancet. 1969;1(7592):459–461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(69)91493-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Bessonov AS. Epizoology and epidemiology of trichinellosis in the USSR: Prospects for eradication of the infection. In: Kim CW, editor. Trichinellosis. New York: Intext; 1974. pp. 557–562. [Google Scholar]
- 232.Rukavina J, Brglez J. Trichinellosis of some species of wild animals in Yugoslavia. Wiad Parazytol. 1970;16(1):79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Nezri M, Ruer J, De Bruyne A, Cohen-Valensi R, Pozio E, Dupouy-Camet J. First report of a human case of trichinellosis due to Trichinella britovi after jackal (Canis aureus) meat consumption in Algeria. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2006;99(2):94–5. (In French). [PubMed]
- 234.Shaikenov BS, Boev SN. Distribution of Trichinella species in the Old World. Wiad Parazytol. 1983;29:595–608. [Google Scholar]
- 235.Mirjalali H, Rezaei S, Pozio E, Naddaf SR, Salahi-Moghaddam A, Kia EB, et al. Trichinella britovi in the jackal Canis aureus from south-west Iran. J Helminthol. 2014;88(4):385–388. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1300028X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Deksne G, Segliņa Z, Jahundoviča I, Esīte Z, Bakasejevs E, Bagrade G, et al. High prevalence of Trichinella spp. in sylvatic carnivore mammals of Latvia. Vet Parasitol. 2016;231:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Blaga R, Gherman C, Seucom D, Cozma V, Boireau P. First identification of Trichinella sp. in golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Romania. J Wildl Dis. 2008;44(2):457–459. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-44.2.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Živojinović MŽ. 2013. Epizootiological, serological and molecular investigtions of Trichinella species. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. PhD thesis; 2013. doi:10.2298/BG20131225ZIVOJINOVIC. (In Serbian).
- 239.Živojinović M, Sofronic-Milosavljevic L, Cvetkovic J, Pozio E, Interisano M, Plavsic B, et al. Trichinella infections in different host species of an endemic district of Serbia. Vet Parasitol. 2013;194(2–4):136–138. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Ćirović D, Teodorović V, Vasilev D, Marković M, Ćosić N, Dimitrijević M, et al. A large-scale study of the Trichinella genus in the golden jackal (Canis aureus) population in Serbia. Vet Parasitol. 2015;212(3–4):253–256. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Merkushev AV. 100 years of the research on trichinosis in the USSR. Zool Zhurnal. 1965;11(4):229–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Massoud J, Mahdavi M. Characterization of northern and southern isolates of Trichinella in Iran. Iran J Publ Health. 1987;16(1–4):91–100. [Google Scholar]
- 243.Kullmann E. Über den ersten Nachweis von Trichinella spiralis (Owen) in Afghanistan. Z Parasitenkd. 1965;25:393–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 244.Feizullaev NA, Litvinov VP, Litvinov VF. Trichinella spiralis in predatory mammals at the Kyzyl-Agach reserve. Doklady Akademii Nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR. 1977;33(2):61–2. (In Russian).
- 245.Matov K, Varadinov A, Genov T. On the distribution of Trichinella spiralis (Owen, 1835) in domestic and wild carnivores, rodents and insectivores in Bulgaria. Izvestiya na Tsentralnata Khelmintologichna Laboratoriya. 1960;5:61–5. (In Bulgarian).
- 246.Kurashvili BE, Rodonaya TE, Matsaberdize GV, Gurchiani KR, Savvateeva IA, Dzhaparidze LA, Petriashvili LI. Trichinelliasis of animals in the Georgian SSR. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik, Tbilisi. 1971;2:19–48. [Google Scholar]
- 247.Mobedi I, Arfaa F, Madadi H, Movafagh K. Sylvatic focus of trichiniasis in the Caspian region, northern Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1973;22(6):720–722. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1973.22.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Sadighian A, Arfaa F, Movafagh K. Trichinella spiralis in carnivores and rodents in Isfahan. J Parasitol. 1973;59(6):986. doi: 10.2307/3278630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Hamidi AN, Mobedi I. Sylvatic focus of trichiniasis in Bandar Abbas area south of Iran. Iran J Public Health. 1977;6(1):30–33. [Google Scholar]
- 250.Massoud J. Trichinellosis in carnivores in Iran. In: Kim CW, Pawlowski ZS, editors. Trichinellosis. Hanover: University Press of New England; 1978. pp. 551–554. [Google Scholar]
- 251.Hamidi AN. Trichiniasis among the animals in north eastern Iran, 1969, 1976, 1977. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1979;72(3):254–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Gretillat S. Epidemiologie de la trichinellose sauvage au Senegal. Wiad Parazytol. 1970;16(1):109–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Cvetkovic J, Teodorovic V, Marucci G, Vasilev D, Vasilev S, Cirovic D, Sofronic-Milosavljevic L. First report of Trichinella britovi in Serbia. Acta Parasitol. 2011;56(2):232–5.
- 254.Petrović J, Pušić I, Apić J, Milanov D, Grgić Ž, Đorđević V, Matekalo-Šverak V. Sylvatic trichinosis - role of wild animals in cycle of spread of trichinosis in Serbia. Vet Glas. 2012;66(3–4):175–83. (In Serbian).
- 255.Petrović J, Grgić Ž, Živkov-Baloš M. Molecular diagnostics of Trichinella species: new data on Trichinella life cycle in Vojvodina region. In: Lilić S, Ðorđević V, editors. Proceedings of the 57th International Meat Industry Conference: Meat and meat products - perspectives of sustainable production. Belgrade: Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology; 2013. p. 152–7.
- 256.Fassbender CP, Mayer P. Uber die Verteilung von Trichinella spiralis in der Muskulatur einiger nordafrikanischer Carnivoren. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1974;81:284–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Anderson RC. Nematode parasites of vertebrates. Their development and transmission, 2nd Ed. New York: CABI Publishing; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 258.Sprent JFA. Notes on Ascaris and Toxascaris, with a definition of Baylisascaris gen. nov. Parasitology. 1968;58(1):185–98. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 259.Despommier D. Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(2):265–272. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.265-272.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Marquardt WC, Demaree RS, Jr, Grieve RB. Parasitology and vector biology. 2. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 261.Razmi GHR. Survey of dogs’ parasites in Khorasan Razavi Province. Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2009;4(4):48–54. [Google Scholar]
- 262.Rokni MB. The present status of human helminthic diseases in Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008;102(4):283–295. doi: 10.1179/136485908X300805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Traversa D, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Di Cesare A, La Torre F, Drake J, Pietrobelli M. Environmental contamination by canine geohelminths. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:67. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Moskvina TV, Ermolenko AV. Helminth infections in domestic dogs from Russia. Vet World. 2016;9(11):1248–1258. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1248-1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Popiołek M, Jarnecki H, Łuczyński T. The first record of Molineus patens (Dujardin, 1845) (Nematoda, Molineidae) in the ermine (Mustela erminea L.) in Poland. Wiad Parazytol. 2009;55(4):433–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Addison EM, Fraser GA. Life cycle of Crenosoma petrowi (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) from black bears (Ursus americanus) Can J Zool. 1994;72(2):300–302. doi: 10.1139/z94-041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Ribas A, Milazzo C, Foronda P, Casanova JC. New data on helminths of stone marten, Martes foina (Carnivora, Mustelidae), in Italy. Helminthologia. 2004;41(1):59–61. [Google Scholar]
- 268.Merrill JR, Otis J, Logan WD Jr, Davis MB. The dog heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in man. An epidemic pending or in progress? JAMA 1980;243(10):1066–8. [PubMed]
- 269.Pampiglione S, Rivasi F. Human dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens: an update of world literature from 1995 to 2000. Parassitologia. 2000;42:231–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Huynh T, Thean J, Maini R. Dipetalonema reconditum in the human eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1384. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1384i. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Simón F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchón R, González-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carretón E, Montoya-Alonso JA. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(3):507–544. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00012-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Burns RP, Helzerman R, Patrick M, Gerhardt N, Beaver PC. Intraocular filiariasis (a motion picture) Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79(5):745–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Beaver PC, Meyer EA, Jarroll EL, Rosenquist RC. Dipetalonema from the eye of a man in Oregon, USA. A case report. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29(3):369–372. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1980.29.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Otranto D, Cantacessi C, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Pfeffer M, Genchi C, et al. The role of wild canids and felids in spreading parasites to dogs and cats in Europe. Part II: helminths and arthropods. Vet Parasitol. 2015;213(1–2):24–37. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Campbell B, Little MD. Identification of the eggs of a nematode (Eucoleus boehmi) from the nasal mucosa of north American dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991;198:1520–1523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Cross JH. Intestinal capillariasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992;5(2):120–129. doi: 10.1128/CMR.5.2.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Lalosević D, Lalosević V, Klem I, Stanojev-Jovanović D, Pozio E. Pulmonary capillariasis miming bronchial carcinoma. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78(1):14–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Guiliano DB, Oksov Y. Trichinella and the nurse cell. In: Schaible UE, Haas A, editors. Intracellular niches of microbes: a pathogens guide through the host cell. Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 279.Beaver PC, Jung RC, Cupp EW. Clinical parasitology. 9. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 280.World Health Organization: Dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs359/en/ (Updated January 2017). Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 281.Genis DE. New cases of detection of Dracunculus medinensis L. 1758 in domestic animals (cats and dogs) in Kazakhstan. Med Parazitol (Moscow). 1972;41(3):365. (In Russian). [PubMed]
- 282.Cairncross S, Muller R, Zagaria N. Dracunculiasis (Guinea worm disease) and the eradication initiative. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2):223–246. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.223-246.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Waikagul J, Diaz Chamacho SP. Gnathostomiasis. In: Murrell KD, Fried B, editors. Food-borne parasitic zoonoses: fish and plant-borne parasites. New York: Springer; 2007. pp. 235–61. [Google Scholar]
- 284.Ignjatovic I, Stojkovic I, Kutlesic C, Tasic S. Infestation of the human kidney with Dioctophyma renale. Urol Int. 2003;70(1):70–73. doi: 10.1159/000067695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin P, Mencke N, Thompson RC. The role of dogs in transmission of gastrointestinal parasites in a remote tea-growing community in northeastern India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67(5):539–545. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.67.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Radev V, Lalkovski N, Zhelyazkov P, Kostova T, Sabev P, Nedelchev N, Vassileva R. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites and Dirofilaria spp. in stray dogs from some regions in Bulgaria. Bulg J Vet Med. 2016;19(1):57–62. doi: 10.15547/bjvm.872. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Berkovitz A, Waner T, King R, Perl S. Concurrent parasitation with Sarcoptes and Demodex in a golden jackal. Israel J Vet Med. 2009;64(1):10–11. [Google Scholar]
- 288.Mitchell RM. A list of ectoparasites from nepalese mammals, collected during the Nepal ectoparasite program. J Med Entomol. 1979;16(3):227–233. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/16.3.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Sharif M. A revision of the Indian Ixodidae with special reference to the collection in the Indian museum. Rec Indian Museum. 1928;30:217–344. [Google Scholar]
- 290.Morel PC. Tiques d’animaux sauvages en Haute-Volta. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1978;31(1):69–78. doi: 10.19182/remvt.8178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Camicas JL. Contribution a l'étude des tiques du Sénégal (Acarina, Ixodoidea). I. Les larves d'Amblyomma Koch et de Hyalomma Koch. Acarologia. 1970;12(1):71–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Stojanov I, Pušić I, Pavlović I, Prodanov Radulović J, Kapetanov M, Ratajac R. Findings of ticks in some species of wild carnivores. In: Mihajla D, editor. Proceedings of International Symposium on Hunting: Modern aspects of sustainable management of game population. Novi Sad: Visio Mundi Academic Media Group; 2014. p. 154–8.
- 293.Hornok S, Fuente J, Horváth G, Fernández de Mera IG, Wijnveld M, Tánczos B, et al. Molecular evidence of Ehrlichia canis and Rickettsia massiliae in ixodid ticks of carnivores from South Hungary. Acta Vet Hung. 2013;61(1):42–50. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 294.D’Amico G, Dumitrache MO, Matei IA, Ionică AM, Gherman CM, Sándor AD, et al. Ixodid ticks parasitizing wild carnivores in Romania. Exp Appl Acarol. 2017;71(2):139–149. doi: 10.1007/s10493-017-0108-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Razmjoo M, Bahrami AM, Hosseini E. Ectoparasitic species from red fox and jackal in western of Iran. Glob Vet. 2013;10(6):626–629. [Google Scholar]
- 296.Razmjoo M, Bahrami AM, Hosseini E. Infestation diagnosis of ectoparasitism in red fox and jackals in south-west of Iran. Adv Biores. 2013;4(3):123–126. [Google Scholar]
- 297.Shubber HWK, Al-Hassani NA, Mohammad MK. Ixodid ticks diversity in the middle and south of Iraq. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2014;5(9):1518–1523. [Google Scholar]
- 298.Feldman-Muhsam B. A note on East Mediterranean species of the Haemophysalis. Bull Res Counc Isr. 1951;1:96–107.
- 299.Keysary A, Eremeeva ME, Leitner M, Din AB, Wikswo ME, Mumcuoglu KY, et al. Spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks collected from wild animals in Israel. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85(5):919–923. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Kaul HN, Dhanda V, Mishra AC. A survey of ixodid ticks in Orissa state, India. Indian J Anim Sci. 1979;49:707–12. [Google Scholar]
- 301.Hoogstraal H. Identity, hosts and distribution of Haemaphysalis (Rhipistoma) canestrinii (Supino) (resurrected), the postulated Asian progenitor of the African Leachi complex (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) J Parasitol. 1971;57(1):161–172. doi: 10.2307/3277774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Geevarghese G, Fernandes S, Kulkarni SM. A checklist of Indian ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) Indian J Anim Sci. 1997;67(5):566–574. [Google Scholar]
- 303.Rebello MJ, Reuben R. A report of ticks collected from birds and small mammals in North Arcot and Chittoor districts, South India. J Bombay Natural Hist Soc. 1966;63(2):283–289. [Google Scholar]
- 304.Hoogstraal H, Trapido H. Haemaphysalis kutchensis sp. n., a common larval and nymphal parasite of birds in northwestern India (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae) J Parasitol. 1963;49(3):489–497. doi: 10.2307/3275824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Hoogstraal H. Notes on African Haemaphysalis ticks. IV. Description of Egyptian populations of the yellow dog-tick, H. leachii leachii (Audouin, 1827) (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae) J Parasitol. 1958;44(5):548–558. doi: 10.2307/3274429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Mitchell CJ, Hoogstraal H, Schaller GB, Spillet J. Ectoparasites from mammals in Kanha National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India, and their potential disease relationships. J Med Ent. 1966;3(2):113–124. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/3.2.113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Hoogstraal H. Identity, distribution, and hosts of Haemaphysalis (Rhipistoma) indica Warburton (resurrected) (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae), a carnivore parasite of the Indian subregion. J Parasitol. 1970;56(5):1013–1022. doi: 10.2307/3277527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Galli VB. Notes de parasitologie et de technique parasitologique. Zbl Bakteriol. 1909;51:538–545. [Google Scholar]
- 309.El Kammah KM, Hoogstraal H, Camicas JL. Notes on African Haemaphysalis ticks: XI. H. (Rhipistoma) paraleachi (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) distribution and hosts of adults. Int J Acarol. 1992;18(3):205–212. doi: 10.1080/01647959208683952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Dias Travassos Santos JA. Contribuição para o conhecimento da fauna ixodológica da Índia portuguesa. An Inst Med Trop. 1954;11(2):361–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Theodor O, Costa M. A survey of the parasites of wild mammals and birds in Israel. Part one. Ectoparasites. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities: Jerusalem; 1967. [Google Scholar]
- 312.Mihalca AD, Dumitrache MO, Magdaş C, Gherman CM, Domşa C, Mircean V, et al. Synopsis of the hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of Romania with update on host associations and geographical distribution. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012;58:183–206. doi: 10.1007/s10493-012-9566-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Abusalimov NS. [Cattle, pigs, wild deer and jackals as hosts of Hyalomma aegyptium Linne 1758.] Doklady Akademii Nauk Azerbaijan SSR. 1958;14:543–545 (In Russian).
- 314.Abbassian-Lintzen R. A preliminary list of ticks (Acariña: Ixodoidea) occurring in Iran and their distributional data. Acarologia. 1960;2(1):43–61. [Google Scholar]
- 315.Hoogstraal H, Clifford CM, Saito Y, Keirans JE. Ixodes (Partipalpiger) ovatus Neumann, subgen. Nov.: identity, hosts, ecology, and distribution (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 1973;10(2):157–64. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 316.Dumitrache MO, Gherman CM, Cozma V, Mircean V, Györke A, Sándor AD, Mihalca AD. Hard ticks (Ixodidae) in Romania: surveillance, host associations, and possible risks for tick-borne diseases. Parasitol Res. 2012;110(5):2067–2070. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2703-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Leulmi H, Aouadi A, Bitam I, Bessas A, Benakhla A, Raoult D, Parola P. Detection of Bartonella tamiae, Coxiella burnetii and rickettsiae in arthropods and tissues from wild and domestic animals in northeastern Algeria. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 318.Bursali A, Keskin A, Tekin S. A review of the ticks (Acari: Ixodida) of Turkey: species diversity, hosts and geographical distribution. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012;57:91–104. doi: 10.1007/s10493-012-9530-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Aneurin LE. Some tick investigations in Kenya Colony. Parasitology. 1932;24(2):175–182. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000020527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Hubbard CA. Some ticks from Iraq. Ent News. 1955;66(7):189–191. [Google Scholar]
- 321.Emerson KC, Price RD. A host-parasite list of the Mallophaga on mammals. Miscell Publ Entomol Soc America Washington. 1981;12:1–72. [Google Scholar]
- 322.Plomley NJB. Notes on the systematics of two species of Heterodoxus (Mallophaga, Boopidae) Pap Proc Roy Soc Tasmania. 1939;1940:19–26. [Google Scholar]
- 323.Tulov AV, Zverjanovskii MI, Zabashta SN. [Associations of consorts in populations of flea at common jackal (Canis aureus L.) in the conditions of Krasnodar Region.] Current Issues in Veterinary Biology. 2013;1(17): 31 (In Russian).
- 324.Pajot FX. Les poux (Insecta, Anoplura) de la région afrotropicale. Paris: IRD. Collection Faune et Flore tropicales; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 325.Lewis RE. Siphonaptera collected during the 1965 Street Expedition to Afghanistan. Fieldiana Zool. 1973;64:1–161.
- 326.Farhang-Azad A. The flea fauna of Iran. II. A collection of fleas from Esfahan (Central Iran). Ann Mag Nat Hist. 1966;13(9:103–105):343–6.
- 327.Haeselbarth E, Segerman J, Zumpt Fritz KE. The arthropod parasites of vertebrates in Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian region). Volume III (Insecta excl. Phthiraptera) Publ South African Inst Med Res. 1966;13(52):1–283. [Google Scholar]
- 328.Kulkarni SM, Bhat HR, Dhanda V. A survey of haematophagous arthropods in western Himalayas, Sikkim and hill districts of West Bengal fleas (Siphonaptera) Indian J Med Res. 1974;62(7):1061–1088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Dumitrache MO, Kiss B, Dantas-Torres F, Latrofa MS, D'Amico G, Sándor AD, Mihalca AD. Seasonal dynamics of Rhipicephalus rossicus attacking domestic dogs from the steppic region of southeastern Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:97. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Földvári G, Farkas R. Ixodid tick species attaching to dogs in Hungary. Vet Parasitol. 2005;129(1–2):125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Walker JB, Keirans JE, Horak IG. The genus Rhipicephalus (Acari, Ixodidae): a guide to the brown ticks of the world. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
- 332.Albrechtová K, Sedlák K, Petrželková KJ, Hlaváč J, Mihalca AD, Lesingirian A, et al. Occurrence of filaria in domestic dogs of Samburu pastoralists in northern Kenya and its associations with canine distemper. Vet Parasitol. 2011;182(2–4):230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. Veterinary parasitology. 3. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 334.Nabavi R, Manouchehri Naeini K, Zebardast N, Hashemi H. Epidemiological study of gastrointestinal helminthes of canids in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province of Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2014;9(2):276–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Loos-Frank B. Cestodes of the genus Mesocestoides (Mesocestoididae) from carnivores in Israel. Israel J Zool. 1990;37(1):3–13. [Google Scholar]
- 336.Zare-Bidaki M, Mobedi I, Sadeghieh Ahari S, Habibizadeh S, Naddaf SR, Siavashi MR. Prevalence of zoonotic intestinal helminths of canids in Moghan plain, northwestern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2010;5(2):42–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Nama HS. Comparative study of the cestodes Mesocestoides carnivoricolus and M. lineatus. Biology. 1981;3(3):31–34. [Google Scholar]
- 338.Gasarov MI, Plieva AM. Helminth fauna of carnivores caught at the territory of the Republic of Ingushetia. Theor Pract Parasit Dis Anim. 2010;11:112–6. [Google Scholar]
- 339.Zverzhanovsky MI, Basova NY, Tulov AV. Parasitocenosis of jackals (Canis aureus L.) with participation of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) in trophic-epizootoloical chains of premountain zone of the Krasnodar Territory. Theor Pract Parasit Dis Animals - Biology. 2011;12:212–5 (In Russian).
- 340.Mimioğlu MM, Güralp N, Tolgay N, Sayn F. Ankara civarnda tilkilerde (Vulpes vulpes) bulduğumuz helmintler. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 1965;12:164–190. [Google Scholar]
- 341.Kornyushin VV. Malyshko (Varodi) EI, Malega AM. The helminths of wild predatory mammals of Ukraine. Cestodes Vestn Zool. 2011;45(6):e1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 342.Sadykhov IA. A new cestode species - Mesocestoides petrowi nov. sp. - from the intestine of fox (Vulpes vulpes). Sb Rab Gel'mintol. 1971:351–3. (In Russian).
- 343.Chertkova AN, Kosupko GA. Cestodes of the genus Mesocestoides found in domestic and wild animals in USSR and some principles of their systematics. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Instituta Gel'mintologii im KI Skryabina Teoreticheskie Problemy Veterinarnoi Gel'mintologii. 1975;22:193–211. (In Russian).
- 344.Breyer I, Georgieva D, Kurdova R, Gottstein B. Echinococcus granulosus strain typing in Bulgaria: the G1 genotype is predominant in intermediate and definitive wild hosts. Parasitol Res. 2004;93(2):127–130. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1116-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Dissanaike AS, Paramananthan DC. On the occurrence of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch,1786) in a Ceylon jackal. Ceylon Vet J. 1960;8(3/4):82–7.
- 346.Troncy P, Graber M. L’échinococcose-hydatidose en Afrique centrale. III. - Teniasis des carnivores à Echinococcus granulosus (Bats& 1186 - Rudolphi, 1801). Rev Elev Méd Vet Pays Trop. 1969;22(1):75–84. [PubMed]
- 347.Yandarhanov HS. Species composition, ecological and biological characteristics and communication biocenotic trematodes and cestodes mining of the Chechen Republic. The South of Russia: ecology, development. 2010;3:94–9. (In Russian).
- 348.Belyaeva AM. The role of wildlife (carnivores, cloven-hoofed animals and rodents) in the epizootology of echinococcosis. Vet Pathol Moscow. 2006;2(17):117–119. [Google Scholar]
- 349.Rao AT, Acharjyo LN. Diagnosis and classification of common diseases of captive animals at Nandankanan zoo in Orissa (India) Indian J Anim Health. 1984;2:147–152. [Google Scholar]
- 350.Zariffard MR. A study on helminthic parasites of wild carnivorous of east Azarbaijan with emphasis on Echinococcus multilocularis. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences. PhD Thesis; 1993.
- 351.Dalimi A, Motamedi G, Hosseini M, Mohammadian B, Malaki H, Ghamari Z, Ghaffari FF. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in western Iran. Vet Parasitol. 2002;105(2):161–171. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Arbabi M, Hooshyar H. Survey of echinococcosis and hydatidosis in Kashan region, central Iran. Iran J Publ Health. 2006;35(1):75–81. [Google Scholar]
- 353.Beiromvand M, Akhlaghi L, Fattahi Massom SH, Mobedi I, Meamar AR, Oormazdi H, et al. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in carnivores in Razavi Khorasan province, Iran using mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(11):e1379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Mobedi I, Zare-Bidaki M, Siavashi MR, Naddaf SR, Kia EB, Mahmoudi M. Differential detection of Echinococcus spp. copro-DNA by nested-PCR in domestic and wild definitive hosts in Moghan plain, Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2013;8(1):107–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Gholami S, Jahandar H, Abastabar M, Pagheh A, Mobedi I, Sharbatkhori M. Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in dogs and jackals from Caspian Sea region, northern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2016;11(2):186–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 356.Panceri P. Due fatti relativi ai Cestodi. Rend dell’Acad Sci Ficici e Mat Napoli. 1868;6:32–4. [Google Scholar]
- 357.Macpherson CNL, Karstad L. The role of jackals in the transmission of Echinococcus granulosus in the Turkana District of Kenya. In: Karstad L, Nestel B, Graham M, editors. Wildlife disease research and economic development. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 1980. pp. 53–56. [Google Scholar]
- 358.Witenberg G. Zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung von Echinokokkus und Trichinen in Palastina. Arch Schiffs- Tropenhyg. 1933;37:37–41. [Google Scholar]
- 359.Iqbal Z, Danso P, Hayat CS, Khan MN. Epidemiology of hydatid disease. Echinococcosis in dogs and jackals in Faisalabad (Pakistan) Indian Vet J. 1996;73(6):620–622. [Google Scholar]
- 360.Ulyanov SD. A study on the role of wolves and jackals in spreading larval cestodosis animals. Tr NIVI Kazakh Phil Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 1957;9:402–4. [Google Scholar]
- 361.Elkanova ZZ. [Epizootological and epidemiological characteristics of foci of echinococcosis in animals and humans in the ecosystem of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic.] Moscow: Thesis for the degree of candidate of biological sciences; 2010 (In Russian).
- 362.Bichieva MM, Atabieva JA, Levchenko NV, Bittirov AM, Shikhaliyev MA, Sarbasheva MM. Epizootological features of Echinococcosis in dogs and wild carnivores in the foothills of the North Caucasus. Vet Pathol. (Moscow). 2011;4(38):103–5. (In Russian).
- 363.Razikov S, Shodmonov IS, Adylov MH. The role of wild animals (carnivorous, artiodactyl and rodents) in epizootology of echinococcosis in Tadjikistan. Russian Parasitol J. 2010;4:59–63. [Google Scholar]
- 364.Boufana B, Lahmar S, Rebaï W, Safta ZB, Jebabli L, Ammar A, et al. Genetic variability and haplotypes of Echinococcus isolates from Tunisia. T Roy Soc Trop Med H. 2014;108(11):706–714. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Széll Z, Marucci G, Pozio E, Sréter T. Echinococcus multilocularis and Trichinella spiralis in golden jackals (Canis aureus) of Hungary. Vet Parasitol. 2013;197(1–2):393–396. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Zariffard MR, Massoud J. Study of Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis infections in Canidiae in Ardabile province of Iran. Arch Inst RAZI. 1998;48/49:47–52. [Google Scholar]
- 367.Lalošević D, Lalošević V, Simin V, Miljević M, Čabrilo B, Bjelić ČO. Spreading of multilocular echinococcosis in southern Europe: the first record in foxes and jackals in Serbia. Vojvodina Province. Eur J Wildl Res. 2016;62(6):793–6. doi: 10.1007/s10344-016-1050-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Kairov IK. [A study of multilocular hydatidosis in Karakalpakiya.] Sovremennoe sostoyanie prirodnykh resursov Karakalpakii. 1977;177–189 (In Russian).
- 369.Acharjyo LN. Helminthiasis in captive wild carnivores and its control in India. Zoo's Print J. 2004;19(7):1540–3. doi: 10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1001.1540-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Polishchuk VI, Dolgov VV. Multiceps infection in carnivores and coenuriasis in sheep in southern and central Tadzhikistan, USSR. Trudy NauchnoIssledovatel’skogo Veterinarnogo Instituta Tadzhikskoi SSR. 1979;9:78–80. (In Russian).
- 371.Zhang L, Hu M, Jones A, Allsopp BA, Beveridge I, Schindler AR, Gasser RB. Characterization of Taenia madoquae and Taenia regis from carnivores in Kenya using genetic markers in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and their relationships with other selected taeniids. Mol Cell Probes. 2007;21(5–6):379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Shemshadi B, Ranjbar-Bahadori S, Jahani S. Prevalence and intensity of intestinal helminths in carnivores and primates at Vakilabad zoo in Mashhad. Iran. Comp Clin Pathol. 2014;24(2):387–91. doi: 10.1007/s00580-014-1909-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Nelson GS, Pester FRN, Rickman R. The significance of wild animals in the transmission of cestodes of medical importance in Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1965;59(6):507–524. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(65)90153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Balkizova ZV, Chilayev SS. Hydatid teniasis of carnivores in the ecosystem of the Central Caucasus region. Bull Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian Univ. 2008;2:179–82. [Google Scholar]
- 375.Kamburov P, Georgieva D. Some data on Taenia ovis and Cysticercus ovis morphology. Helminthologia. 1984;21(3):195–198. [Google Scholar]
- 376.Abuladze KI. [Principles of cestodology. Volume IV. Taeniata. Cestodes of animals and man and the diseases caused by them.] Moscow: Izdatel'stvo 'Nauka'; 1964 (In Russian).
- 377.Nama HS. Cestode parasites of Indian mammals. New Delhi: Scientific Publishers; 1990. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the conclusions are provided within the article.