Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron. 2016 Nov 5;73(29):4206–4213. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.11.016

The intramolecular click reaction using ‘carbocontiguous’ precursors

Pravin C Patil 1, Frederick A Luzzio 1,
PMCID: PMC5603183  NIHMSID: NIHMS829755  PMID: 28943665

Abstract

The synthesis and utilization of all carbon-chain ‘carbocontiguous’ azidoalkynyl precursors for an intramolecular click reaction is described. The substrates contain both azidoalkyl and ethynylmethyl groups which are conjoined by a 2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole lynchpin and are suitably disposed for ring closure. On promotion by copper salts, a number of cyclic click products having the 1,4-disubstituted endo-fused triazole component and the 4,5-diphenyloxazole component are obtained. In one case, removal of the phenylsulfonylmethyl group from the substrate prior to cyclization gave the 1,5-disubstituted exo-fused triazole. The utilization of CuSO4/sodium ascorbate system appears to be the optimal conditions for closure/cyclization and afforded the cyclized products in yields of 84-95%.

Keywords: click chemistry; cyclic carbohydrates; cyclic peptides; dipolar cycloaddition; 1,2,3-triazole

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-829755-f0001.jpg

1. Introduction

Click reactions can facilitate the conjoining of large and small molecular fragments for study and applications in many areas of chemistry, including materials and biomolecular science.1 The intramolecular click reaction comprises an interesting subset of the fundamental Huisgen 3+2 dipolar cycloaddition reaction whereby a 1,2,3-triazole is formed within a precursor bearing both alkyne and azide moieties to form a ring.2 The intramolecular form of the reaction need only utilize a substrate which possesses both necessary reactive functionalities as well as entropic favorability for ring closure. At present the most frequent examples of the intramolecular click reaction involve substrates which do have the required reactive functionality, but possess heteroatoms such as oxygen and nitrogen.2 For example, when both the azide and alkynyl functionality are built into polypeptides, the stage is set for the cycloaddition to afford cyclic polypeptide analogues containing the signature 1,2,3-triazole ring. Depending on the ring-size potential, the intramolecular click reaction can provide two modes of addition whereby a 1,5- or a 1,4-disubstituted triazole is formed (Fig. 1). Specifically, the modes of addition may result in an exo-disposed C-C double bond, a.k.a., the 1,5-disubstituted triazole, or the endo-disposed C-C double bond or otherwise the 1,4-disubstituted triazole. The endo or exo products arising from cycloaddition of the azide to the alkyne defines the overall ring size and provides a ring whereby the endo product possesses one more carbon in the chain than the exo-derived product.3 Moreover, the newly-formed 1,2,3-triazole ring which is common to either cyclic polypeptide or most recently, even cyclic carbohydrate ‘click’ analogues, may act in additional capacity as a basic, hydrogen bond acceptor or π–stacking site.4 We describe herein an intramolecular click reaction in which the azide-alkyne precursor are the reacting components in a contiguous carbon chain thereby yielding two new rings. One of the rings is the connecting triazole which is fused to the second ‘major’ ring, namely the triazole-fused azecane, azacycloundecane, azacyclododecane, azatridecane or azatetradecane (10-14 membered rings, respectively), depending on the size of the azidoalkyl chain. The functionality of the larger of the newly-formed rings is represented by a 4,5-diphenyloxazole, an established carboxyl group equivalent which also performs as an efficient synthetic scaffold.5 The carbon substituted at 2-position of the 4,5-diphenyloxazole acts as a lynchpin which connects both the alkynyl and azido appendages prior to cyclization via the intramolecular click reaction.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Possible exo vs endo double bond disposition and 1,2,3-triazole substitution in the intramolecular click products of an azido alkyne having ten contiguous carbons.

2. Results and Discussion

Our synthesis of the click macrocyclization precursors begins with the 2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 1 (Fig. 2), a versatile intermediate reported previously from these laboratories which can be utilized to prepare extended oxazoles with diverse functionality.6 Using a deprotonation/alkylation sequence, the α-methylenesulfone 1 offers an efficient hinge point for which to attach appendages that carry both the necessary azide and alkynyl functionalities prior to cyclization. Our previous studies showed that alkylation of 1 using potassium tert-butoxide/THF followed by addition of 1,6-dibromohexane provided the monoalkylated product 2a (53%) and not the expected cyclic product from double (intramolecular) alkylation (Fig. 2).5 This result was in sharp contrast to using 1,3-diiodopentane, 1,4-dibromobutane or 1,5-dibromopentane which gave the cyclic products as a result of intramolecular dialkylation.7 Hence, treatment of 1 with potassium tert-butoxide in THF followed by addition of 1,6-dibromohexane, 1,7-dibromoheptane, 1,8-dibromooctane or 1,9-dibromononane gave the 2-(bromoalkyl)-2-(phenylsulfonyl)oxazoles 2a-d in yields of 45-66% after column chromatography (Scheme 1). The purified 2-haloalkyl-(phenylsulfonylmethyl)oxazoles 2a-d were again treated with potassium tert-butoxide/THF followed by propargyl bromide to provide the 2-(ethynylmethyl)-2-(haloalkyl)-2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl)oxazoles 3a-d in 42-80% yield after purification by column chromatography (Scheme 1). Treatment of the haloalkyl-propargylated products 3a-d with sodium azide/DMF smoothly afforded the 2-(azidoalkyl)-2-(ethynylmethyl)-2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl) oxazoles 5a-d (77-98%) which now carry the necessary functionality for the intramolecular click reaction. Alternatively, the 2-(haloalkyl)-2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl) oxazoles 2a-d were treated with sodium azide (DMF/rt/16 h) to give the 2-azidoalkyl-2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl)oxazoles 4a-d (73-81%). The azides 4a-d were then propargylated (potassium tert-butoxide/propargyl bromide/THF) to provide the click substrates 5a-d (42-52%) after purification by column chromatography (Scheme 1). The route involving the conversion of 2a-d to substrates 5a-d through intermediates 3a-d (Scheme 1, conditions b, c) appeared to be the most serviceable, so accordingly, the scale-up preparations of the click substrates were performed through the propargylated haloalkyl intermediates 3a-d.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

2-(Phenylsulfonylmethyl)-4,5-Diphenyloxazole scaffolds 1 and alkylation products

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of intramolecular click substrates 5a-d from intermediate 1.

Reagents/Conditions: (a) 1,6-, 1,7-, 1,8- or 1,9-dihalide/KOt-Bu/THF rt/16 h. (b) propargyl bromide/KOt-Bu/THF/rt/16 h. (c) NaN3/DMF/rt/16 h. (d) NaN3/DMF/rt/16 h. (e) propargyl bromide/KOt-Bu/THF/rt/16 h.

The intramolecular click reactions in which the azidoalkyne substrates 5a-d are converted to the corresponding cyclized products 6a-d are shown in Scheme 2. Utilizing the first member of the homologous substrate series 5a (Table 1), a number of variables, including copper source, reducing agent, base, solvent, reaction time and temperature were examined for the optimization of its cyclization to 6a. While thermally-promoted click reactions have been reported,8 refluxing solvents such as toluene or methanol alone were not sufficient for the cyclization of test substrate 5a (Entries 1 and 2, Table 1)9 and starting material was recovered in these experiments. Combinations of copper sulfate pentahydrate (0.1-0.5 eq) sodium ascorbate 0.5-1.0 eq) in a moderately polar solvent/water (THF/H2O) system gave at best, modest yields of product (38-51%) even after a reaction time of 16-48 h (Entries 7 and 8, Table 1). The use of ligand additives such as benzoic acid did not enhance the yields (Entries 13 and 14, Table 1), while the use of DMSO as a co-solvent with water did provide a 53% yield (Entry 12, Table 1). The employment of bases such as DIPEA or cesium carbonate along with the CuSO4/ascorbate system (Entries 3 and 5, Table 1)10 did not afford a marked improvement while bases such as DBU resulted in decomposition of starting material (Entry 4).11 The optimal conditions utilized copper sulfate pentahydrate (0.2 eq), sodium ascorbate (0.5 eq) in tert-butanol:water (2:1) at 90-95 °C whereby the reaction was completed in one hour (96%, Entry 11, Table 1).12,13,14 Mechanistic studies explain that, in general, the regiochemistry or otherwise mode of addition of the copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition gives the 1,4-triazole cycloadducts. These cases include many copper-catalyzed intramolecular click reactions in which monomeric or dimeric macrocycles result from the endo or 1,4 addition. However, with smaller potential ring sizes, the 1,5- or exo cycloadducts can result despite the employment of the copper/ascorbate reaction system.3 Consistent with mechanistic studies, we find that in the products 6a-d, the endo or 1,4-disposed regioisomers resulted from the cycloaddition. Routine 400 or 700 MHz 1H NMR data recorded with products 6a-d reveal that the lone triazole proton, although obscured by two phenyl groups of the oxazole and one of the phenylsulfonyl group, firmly reside in the δ7.2-7.6 region. To examine the regiochemistry, or endo vs exo disposition of the intramolecular click cycloaddition reaction, NOESY experiments at 700MHz (CDCl3) were performed with products 6a-d.3 The NOESY experiments revealed that in all four example, overlap of the triazole ring proton and the geminal protons of the ring methylene that is α- to the N1 of the triazole. Interestingly, close examination of the NOESY spectrum of the smallest ring product 6a revealed additional overlap between the triazole ring proton and the geminal protons of the methylene positioned in between the triazole group and the phenylsulfonylmethyl group. With the precursors of the intramolecular click reaction having a 1,1- or gem substitution of both the diphenyloxazole and the phenylsulfonyl group at the quaternary C-4 (numbered from the acetylene end), we surmised that the click cyclization yields of 6a-d would be higher due to a type of Thorpe-Ingold effect.15 So a distinct difference in the yield of click-cyclized product might be observed if one of the groups, namely the phenylsulfonyl group, was removed prior to cyclization. Hence, the desulfonylation of the 2-azidohexyl-2-(phenylsulfonylmethyl) oxazole 5a (Mg/HgCl2/MeOH/rt/30 min), using conditions optimized for substrates in a previous study.7 provided the oxazoyl azidoalkyne 7 in 68% yield after column chromatography (Scheme 3). Click cyclization of 7 (CuSO4·5H2O/sodium ascorbate/90-95 °C/30 min) afforded the oxazole-substituted 1,2,3-triazole-fused azecane exo-8 in 73% isolated yield, which was markedly less than that of 6a (derived from sulfonyl-substituted 5a). Surprisingly, NOESY experiments conducted on isolated product 8 revealed no overlap between the exo-disposed triazole ring proton and the protons of the major ring of 8.3

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Intramolecular click reactions of substrates 5a-d to give cyclized products 6a-d. Reagents/Conditions: (See also Table 1): (a) CuSO4.5H2O/sodium ascorbate/t-BuOH:H2O/90-95 °C/30 min.

Table 1.

Optimization of the intramolecular click reaction of 5a to 6a.

Entry/Ref Cu source (eq) Reducing agent (eq) Ligand/Base (eq) Conditions Yield (%)/Result1
19 Toluene/reflux/16 h NR
2 MeOH/reflux/16h NR
310 CuI (1.1) DIPEA (25) THF/rt 44
411 CuI (1.0) DBU (20) Toluene/rt/16 h Decomp.
5 CuI (0.1) Na ascorbate (0.2) Cs2CO3 (2.0) DMF/60°C/16 h 38
612 CuSO4.5H2O (1 mol%) Na ascorbate (10 mol%) t-BuOH-H2O/rt/12 h 40
7 CuSO4.5H2O (0.1) Na ascorbate (0.5) THF/H2O (2:1)/rt/48 h 38
8 CuSO4.5H2O (0.5) Na ascorbate (1.0) THF/H2O (2:1)/rt/16 h 51
913 CuSO4.5H2O (0.1) Na ascorbate (0.5) DMSO-t-BuOH-H2O (4:2:1) rt/48 h 28
1014 CuSO4.5H2O (0.2) Na ascorbate (0.5) t-BuOH-H2O (2:1)/60 °C/16 h 43
1114 CuSO4.5H2O (0.2) Na ascorbate (1.0) t-BuOH-H2O (2:1)/90-95 °C/1 h 96
12 CuSO4.5H2O (0.1) Na ascorbate (0.5) DMSO-H2O (1:2)/rt/16 h 53
13 CuSO4.5H2O (0.2) Na ascorbate (0.8) Benzoic acid (0.1) THF-H2O-t-BuOH (3:1:1)/rt/12 h 45
14 CuSO4.5H2O (1 mol%) Na ascorbate (5 mol%) Urea (2 mol%) 35
1

Yields are for isolated purified compounds

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis and intramolecular click reaction of nonphenylsulfone-substituted substrate 7 to 8. Reagents/conditions: (a) Mg/HgCl2/MeOH/rt/30 min (68%). (b) CuSO4.5H2O/90-95 °C/30 min (73%).

3. Conclusions

Using an activated 2-substituted-4,5-diphenyloxazole as a central scaffold, and sequentially attaching haloalkyl and propargyl groups followed by nucleophilic azidation, a number of carbocontiguous precursors for a series of intramolecular click reactions were prepared. The sequence of synthetic steps from the starting diphenyloxazole scaffold proved to be interchangeable and gave modest to good yields of the substrate azidoalkynes. The click reactions which afforded the highest yields were mediated with a copper sulfate/sodium ascorbate reagent system, employed a relatively polar aqueous alcohol solvent mixture and yielded the 1,4 exo-disubstituted products. The phenylsulfonyl activating group inherent in the ten-carbon starting scaffold could be reductively removed prior to cyclization and provided a click substrate, which in contrast to the other click examples, provided the 1,5 exo-disubstituted triazole. Our studies of the intramolecular click reaction of ‘carbocontiguous’ precursors and their products is the first study of its type in click chemistry. Our studies will continue to include cyclizations of substrates having diverse functionality and will be the topics of future communications from these laboratories.

4. Experimental

Solvents and reagents are ACS grade and were used as commercially supplied. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) utilized 0.25 mm pre-cut glass-backed plates (Merck, Silica Gel 60 F254). Thin-layer chromatograms were visualized during chromatographic and extraction runs by rapidly dipping the plates in anisaldehyde/ethanol/sulfuric acid stain or phosphomolybdic acid/ethanol stain and heating (hot plate). Gravity-column chromatography was carried out using silica gel 60 (E. Merck 7734, 70-230 mesh). Flash-column chromatography utilized silica gel 60 (E. Merck 9385, 230-400 mesh) with nitrogen gas pressurization. Melting points were taken on a Thomas Hoover apparatus. Extracts and chromatographic fractions were concentrated with a Büchi rotavapor under water aspirator vacuum. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H and l3C NMR) spectra were recorded with Varian VNMRS 400 or 700 MHz instruments using CDCl3 as a solvent and TMS as internal standard. Infrared spectra (FTIR) were recorded with a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 100 instrument and spectral values are reported as cm−1. The measurement of high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were performed at the Texas A&M University Laboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry.

General Procedure for synthesis of bromoalkyl-substituted sulfones 2a-d)

To a stirred solution of 2-(phenylsulfonyl)methyl-4,5-diphenyloxazole 1 (500 mg, 1.33 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in dry THF (10 mL) was added potassium tert-butoxide (1.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv) at 5 °C. The resulting yellow reaction mixture was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere (30 min). The dibromo alkane (1.60 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was then slowly added to the reaction mixture by syringe, and reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirring was continued (16 h). After completion of reaction, cold water (10 mL) was poured into the reaction mixture followed by extraction with dichloromethane (2 × 20 mL). The organic layers were combined, washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 9:1) to afford the corresponding products 2a-d.

2-(7-Bromo-1-(phenylsulfonyl)heptyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 2a

colorless oil (380 mg, 53%); Rf = 0.54 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3069, 2959, 1690, 1447, 1321, 1148, 687 cm−1; 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.78 −7.76 (m, 2H), 7.61 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.52-7.47 (m, 6H), 7.38-7.33 (m, 6H), 4.51 (dd, J = 10.0 Hz, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.40-2.37 (m, 2H), 1.83-1.80 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.37 (m, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.8, 147.0, 137.1, 136.0, 134.0, 131.6, 129.0, 128.92, 128.89, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.0, 127.8, 126.5, 65.7, 33.6, 32.4, 28.0, 27.6, 26.7, 26.3 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C28H28BrNO3S [M+H]+ 538.1052, found 538.1066.

2-(8-Bromo-1-(phenylsulfonyl)octyll)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 2b

Colorless oil (460 mg, 62%); Rf = 0.36 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3067, 2959, 1692, 1443, 1327, 1149, 690 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.46 (m, 6H), 7.35-7.33 (m, 6H), 4.48 (dd, J = 10.0 Hz, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.39-2.35 (m, 2H), 1.83-1.77 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.31 (m, 8H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.9, 147.0, 137.3, 136.0, 134.1, 131.7, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 65.9, 33.8, 32.6, 28.7, 28.3, 27.9, 26.8, 26.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C29H30BrNO3S [M+Na]+ 574.1022, found 574.1062.

2-(9-Bromo-1-(phenylsulfonyl)nonyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 2c

Colorless oil (500 mg, 66%); Rf = 0.35 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3058, 2929, 1698, 1447, 1323, 1150, 692 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.46 (m, 6H), 7.36-7.34 (m, 6H), 4.50 (dd, J = 10.0 Hz, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.41-2.36 (m, 2H), 1.81 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.38-1.28 (m, 10H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.0, 147.0, 137.3, 136.0, 134.1, 131.7, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 126.5, 65.9, 33.9, 32.7, 28.9, 28.8, 28.5, 28.0, 26.8, 26.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C30H32BrNO3S [M+Na]+ 588.1178, found 588.1198.

2-(10-Bromo-1-(phenylsulfonyl)decyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 2d

Colorless oil (350 mg, 45%); Rf = 0.33 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3061, 2927, 1698, 1446, 1323, 1149, 692 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.47 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.34 (m, 6H), 4.51 (dd, J = 9.6 Hz, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.39-2.36 (m, 2H), 1.84-1.77 (m, 2H), 1.43-1.26 (m, 12H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.0, 147.0, 137.3, 136.0, 134.1, 131.8, 129.1, 128.99, 128.97, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 126.6, 65.9, 34.0, 32.7, 29.2, 29.0, 28.9, 28.6, 28.1, 26.9, 26.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C31H34BrNO3S [M+Na]+ 602.1335.1521, found 602.1366.

General procedure for synthesis of bromoalkyl propargyl intermediates 3a-d

Potassium tert-butoxide (50 mg, 0.45 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of bromoalkyl (phenylsulfone) 2a-d (200 mg, 0.34-0.37 mmol) in THF (15 mL) at 5-10 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred (30 min) then propargyl bromide (0.41-0.44 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was slowly added by syringe under nitrogen. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirring was continued overnight after which time TLC indicated that the reaction was complete. The reaction mixture was quenched with cold water (10 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 20 mL). The organic extracts were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to give a crude oily residue. Submission of the residue to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1) afforded the pure bromohexyl (propargyl)sulfones 3a-d as colorless oils.

2-(10-Bromo-4-(phenylsulfonyl)dec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 3a

Colorless oil (170 mg, 80%); Rf = 0.51 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3294, 2935, 1447, 1308, 1145, 688 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.43 (m, 6H), 7.41-7.33 (m, 6H), 3.43 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.75-2.68 (m, 1H), 2.57-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.10 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.91-1.84 (m, 2H), 1.80-1.76 (m, 1H), 1.52-1.43 (m, 5H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.9, 147.0, 135.92, 135.90, 134.1, 131.7, 129.8, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 77.5, 72.1, 69.7, 33.8, 32.5, 29.8, 28.9, 27.7, 23.6, 21.2 ppm. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C31H30BrNO3S [M+H]+ 576.1208, found 576.1212.

2-(11-Bromo-4-(phenylsulfonyl)undec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 3b

Colorless oil (121 mg, 57% ); Rf = 0.58 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3292, 2930, 1445, 1308, 1145, 689 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.46-7.41 (m, 4H), 7.38-7.34 (m, 6H), 3.42 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.75-2.68 (m, 1H), 2.57-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.10 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.88-1.75 (m, 3H), 1.48-1.42 (m, 7H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.9, 147.0, 135.94, 135.93, 134.1, 131.7, 129.8, 129.0, 128.74, 128.68, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.6, 77.5, 72.1, 69.8, 33.9, 32.7, 29.9, 29.6, 28.3, 28.0, 23.7, 21.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C32H32BrNO3S [M+H]+ 590.1365, found 590.1337.

2-(12-Bromo-4-(phenylsulfonyl)dodec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 3c

Colorless oil (92 mg, 43%); Rf = 0.61 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3305, 2928, 1446, 1308, 1146, 689 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.41 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.31 (m, 6H), 3.41 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.27 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 2.74-2.67 (m, 1H), 2.57-2.49 (m, 1H), 2.09 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.87-1.73 (m, 3H), 1.42-1.35 (m, 9H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.0, 147.0, 135.95, 135.91, 134.1, 131.8, 129.8, 129.0, 128.72, 128.66, 128.55, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 77.5, 72.1, 69.8, 34.0, 32.7, 29.9, 29.7, 28.9, 28.5, 28.1, 23.7, 21.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C33H34BrNO3S [M+H]+ 604.1521, found 604.1490.

2-(13-Bromo-4-(phenylsulfonyl)tridec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 3d

Colorless oil (89 mg, 42%); Rf = 0.62 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3293, 2928, 1446, 1309, 1146, 1064, 689 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.41 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.34 (m, 6H), 3.42 (dd, J = 18.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.27 (dd, J = 18.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 2.70-2.67 (m, 1H), 2.57-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.09 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.87-1.73 (m, 3H), 1.42-1.30 (m, 11H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.0, 147.0, 135.96, 135.91, 134.1, 131.8, 129.8, 129.0, 128.72, 128.65, 128.55, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 77.5, 72.1, 69.8, 34.0, 32.8, 29.9, 29.8, 29.7, 29.0, 28.7, 28.1, 23.8, 21.3 ppm.. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C34H36BrNO3S [M+H]+ 618.1678, found 618.1702.

General procedure for synthesis of azidoalkyl substituted sulfones 4a-d)

To a clear solution of bromoalkyl sulfone 2a-d (350 mg, 0.60 - 0.65 mmol, 1.0 equiv), in dry DMF (10 mL) was added NaN3 (0.72-0.78 mmol, 1.2 equiv) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then stirred overnight at room temperature. Upon completion of reaction as indicated by TLC, the reaction mixture was diluted with cold water (25 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 25 mL). The combined extracts were washed with water then brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The drying agent was then removed and concentration of the dried extracts gave a crude residue. Submission of the oily crude residue to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1) gave the azidoalkyl oxazoles 4a-d as white or off-white amorphous solids.

2-(7-Azido-1-(phenylsulfonyl)heptyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 4a

Off-white amorphous solid (260 mg, 80%) mp 58-60 °C; Rf = 0.53 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3058, 2938, 2093, 1446, 1320, 1148, 691 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.44 (m, 6H), 7.34-7.32 (m, 6H), 4.47 (dd, J = 10.8 Hz, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.38-2.35 (m, 2H), 1.56-1.53 (m, 2H), 1.40-1.36 (m, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.8, 147.1, 137.2, 136.0, 134.1, 131.7, 129.1, 129.01, 128.99, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 65.8, 51.3, 28.6, 28.5, 26.8, 26.4, 26.3 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C28H28N4O3S [M+Na]+ 523.1774, found 523.1742.

2-(8-Azido-1-(phenylsulfonyl)octyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 4b

White amorphous solid (238 mg, 73%) mp 82-85 °C; Rf = 0. 28 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3067, 2931, 2093, 1446, 1321, 1148 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.46 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.34 (m, 6H), 4.49 (dd, J = 9.6 Hz, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.39-2.36 (m, 2H), 1.57-1.53 (m, 2H), 1.40-1.32 (m, 8H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.9, 147.0, 137.3, 136.0, 134.1, 131.7, 129.1, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 65.8, 51.3, 28.8, 28.7, 28.6, 26.8, 26.5, 26.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C29H30N4O3S [M+Na]+ 537.1931, found 537.1917.

2-(9-Azido-1-(phenylsulfonyl)nonyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 4c

White amorphous solid (261 mg, 80%) mp 62-64 °C; Rf = 0. 34 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3062, 2928, 2092, 1446, 1322, 1149 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.45 (m, 6H), 7.35-7.33 (m, 6H), 4.49 (dd, J = 9.6 Hz, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.38-2.33 (m, 2H), 1.58-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.28 (m, 10H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.9, 147.0, 137.3, 136.0, 134.1, 131.7, 129.1, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 126.5, 65.9 (65.8), 51.4, 28.93, 28.89, 28.8, 28.7, 26.9, 26.6, 26.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C30H32N4O3S [M+Na]+ 551.2087, found 551.2112.

2-(10-Azido-1-(phenylsulfonyl)decyl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 4d

Colorless oil (265 mg, 81%); Rf = 0.38 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3067, 2928, 2093, 1712, 1446, 1322, 1149 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.46 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.32 (m, 6H), 4.50 (dd, J = 10.4 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.41-2.34 (m, 2H), 1.59-1.52 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.26 (m, 12H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.9, 147.0, 137.3, 136.0, 134.1, 131.7, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 126.5, 65.9, 51.4, 29.2, 29.0, 28.9, 28.8, 28.7, 26.9, 26.6, 26.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C31H34N4O3S [M+Na]+ 565.2244, found 565.2234.

General procedure for synthesis of azidoalkyl propargyl substituted sulfones 5a-d from azidoalkyl sulfones 4a-d

Potassium tert-butoxide (0.44-0.48 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added to a stirred solution of azidoalkyl (phenylsulfone) 4a-d (200 mg, 0.37-0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in THF (15 mL) at 5-10 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred (30 min) then propargyl bromide (0.44-0.48 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was slowly added by syringe under nitrogen. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir overnight at room temperature after which time TLC indicated that the reaction was complete. The reaction mixture was quenched with cold water (10 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 20 mL). The organic extracts were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to give a crude oily residue. Submission of the residue to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 9:1) afforded the pure azidoalkyl (propargyl) sulfones 5a-d as colorless oils.

General procedure for synthesis of azidoalkyl propargyl substituted sulfones (5a-5d) from bromopropargyl sulfones 3a-3d

To a clear solution of bromoalkyl propargyl sulfones 3a-d (100 mg, 0.16 - 0.17 mmol, 1.0 equiv), in dry DMF (10 mL) was added NaN3 (0.19-0.20 mmol, 1.2 equiv) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir overnight at room temperature. After completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with cold water (25 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 25 mL). The combined extracts were washed with water then brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Evaporation of organic solvent under vacuum using a rotary evaporator gave a crude residue. Submission of the oily crude residue to gravity-column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1) gave the azidoalkyl propargyl sulfonylmethyloxazoles 5a-d, respectively as colorless oils.

2-(10-Azido-4-(phenylsulfonyl)dec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5a

Colorless oil (99 mg, 46%); Rf = 0.38 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3299, 2937, 2093, 1308, 1145 cm−1; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.41 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.31 (m, 6H), 3.42 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (dd, J = 17.6 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.75-2.69 (m, 1H), 2.57-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.09 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.80-1.77 (m, 1H), 1.64-1.46 (m, 7H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.9, 147.0, 135.93, 135.92, 134.1, 131.7, 129.8, 129.0,128.7,128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 77.5, 72.1, 69.7, 51.4, 29.8, 29.3, 28.7, 26.3, 23.6, 21.3 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C31H30N4O3S [M+H]+ 539.2117, found 539.2124

2-(11-Azido-4-(phenylsulfonyl)undec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5b

Colorless oil (111 mg, 52%); Rf = 0.39 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3302, 2932, 2093, 1446, 1308, 1145 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.47 (m, 2H), 7.45-7.41 (m, 4H), 7.37-7.33 (m, 6H), 3.41 (dd, J = 17.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (dd, J = 17.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.71-2.68 (m, 1H), 2.56-2.49 (m, 1H), 2.09 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.78-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.60-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.44-1.40 (m, 7H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.9, 147.0, 135.94, 135.92, 134.1, 131.7, 129.8, 129.0, 128.73, 128.66, 128.55, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 77.5, 72.1, 69.8, 51.4, 29.8, 29.6, 28.7, 28.6, 26.5, 23.7, 21.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C32H32O3S [M+Na]+ 575.2087, found 575.2097.

2-(12-Azido-4-(phenylsulfonyl)dodec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5c

Colorless oil (102 mg, 48%); Rf = 0.40 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3296, 2931, 2095, 1447, 1309, 1146 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.46-7.41 (m, 4H), 7.38-7.33 (m, 6H), 3.43 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (dd, J = 17.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.75-2.68 (m, 1H), 2.57-2.50 (m, 1H), 2.10 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.79-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.59-1.54 (m, 2H), 1.45-1.35 (m, 9H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.0, 147.0, 136.0, 135.9, 134.1, 131.8, 129.8, 129.0, 128.7, 128.67, 128.6, 128.4, 128.1, 128.0, 126.6, 77.6, 72.1, 69.8, 51.4, 29.9, 29.7, 29.0, 28.8, 26.6, 23.7, 21.3 ppm. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C33H34N4O3S [M+Na] 589.2244, found 589.2239.

2-(13-Azido-4-(phenylsulfonyl)tridec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5d

Colorless oil (90 mg, 42%); Rf = 0.42 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3302, 2928, 2092, 1446, 1308, 1145 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49-7.47 (m, 2H), 7.46-7.39 (m, 5H), 7.35-7.31 (m, 5H), 3.41 (dd, J = 18.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (dd, J = 18.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.73-2.67 (m, 1H), 2.56-2.49 (m, 1H), 2.09 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.77-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.63-1.54 (m, 2H), 1.43-1.31 (m, 11H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.0, 145.0, 136.0, 135.9, 134.0, 131.8, 129.8, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.9, 126.5, 77.5, 72.0, 69.8, 51.4, 29.87, 29.78, 29.3, 29.03, 29.02, 28.8, 26.7, 23.8, 21.3 ppm.; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C34H36N4O3S [M+Na]+ 603.2300, found 603.2309.

General procedure for the synthesis of final click compounds 6a-d from phenylsulfonylmethyl azidoalkyne precursors 5a-d

To the clear solution of 5a-d (0.077-0.235 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in 1.5 mL of t-BuOH:H2O (2:1) was added CuSO4.5H2O (0.015-0.047 mmol, 0.2 equiv) and sodium ascorbate (0.077-0.235 mmol, 1.0 equiv) at room temperature. The reaction mass was then heated to 90-95 °C (oil bath) for 30 min. During the progress of reaction, a light yellow color solid was separated from reaction mass and adhered to the bottom of reaction flask. Upon completion of reaction, as indicated by TLC, the reaction mass was cooled to room temperature, then diluted with water (10 mL) and extracted in dichloromethane (2 × 15 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to give a light yellow solid. The resulted crude solid product s were washed ethyl acetate (1 mL) and ethyl acetate layer was decanted thereafter to obtain the pure cyclized products 6a-d, respectively. The above described procedure also used for synthesis of cyclic click compound 8 from 7.

4,5-diphenyl-2-(5-(phenylsulfonyl)-4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11-octahydro-[1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a]azecin-5-yl)oxazole 6a

Light yellow amorphous solid (95 mg, 95%) mp 138-140 °C (decomp); Rf = 0.4 (chloroform/MeOH, 4:1); FT-IR: 3061, 2932, 1446, 1306, 1142, 689 cm−1; 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56-7.54 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.48-7.42 (m, 4H), 7.35-7.28 (m, 10H), 4.19-4.14 (m, 2H), 4.06 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (d, J = 8.8Hz, 1H), 2.41 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 1.90-1.88 (m, 1H), 1.79-1.77 (m, 2H), 1.29-1.24 (m, 5H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.5, 146.6, 140.9, 136.8, 135.9, 133.8, 131.7, 129.5, 129.0, 128.7, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.0, 127.9, 126.5, 124.1, 71.8, 50.1, 29.9, 29.1, 26.5, 25.8, 23.3, 22.6 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C31H30N4O3S [M+H]+ 539.2117, found 539.2181.

4,5-diphenyl-2-(5-(phenylsulfonyl)-5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12-octahydro-4H-[1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a][1]azacycloundecin-5-yl)oxazole 6b

Light yellow amorphous solid (120 mg, 92%) mp 142-144 °C (decomp); Rf = 0.47 (chloroform/MeOH, 4:1); FT-IR: 3061, 2932, 1446, 1306, 1142, 689 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.49-7.44 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.31 (m, 10H), 4.19-4.14 (m, 2H), 4.10 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.16 (t, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 1.87-1.76 (m, 3H), 1.36-1.27 (m, 7H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.5, 146.6, 141.0, 136.9, 135.9, 133.8, 131.7, 129.5, 129.0, 128.72, 128.68, 128.6, 128.4, 128.0, 127.9, 126.4, 124.1, 71.8, 50.2, 30.1, 29.9, 29.5, 28.4, 26.7, 26.2, 23.5 ppm.

4,5-diphenyl-2-(5-(phenylsulfonyl)-4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13-decahydro-[1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a][1]azacyclododecin-5-yl)oxazole 6c

Light yellow amorphous solid (67 mg, 84%) mp 146-148 °O (decomp); Rf = 0.40 (chloroform/MeOH, 4:1); FT-IR: 3061, 2930, 1446, 1306, 1143, 690 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.49-7.45 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.32 (m, 10H), 4.23-4.21 (m, 2H), 4.11 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 2.17 (t, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 1.87-1.76 (m, 3H), 1.26-1.22 (m, 9H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.5, 146.6, 141.0, 136.9, 135.9, 133.8, 131.7, 129.5, 129.0, 128.70, 128.67, 128.6, 128.4, 128.0, 127.9, 126.4, 124.0, 71.8, 50.2, 30.1, 30.0, 29.7, 28.8, 28.7, 26.7, 26.3, 23.6 ppm.

4,5-diphenyl-2-(5-(phenylsulfonyl)-5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14-decahydro-4H-[1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a][1]azacyclotridecin-5-yl)oxazole 6d

Light yellow amporphous solid (38 mg, 84%) mp 134-136 °C (decomp); Rf = 0.55 (chlorofom/MeOH, 4:1); FT-IR: 3061, 2925, 1445, 1306, 1143, 690 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.50-7.47 (m, 4H), 7.38-7.32 (m, 10H), 4.23-4.21 (m, 2H), 4.11 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (t, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 1.86-1.78 (m, 3H), 1.23.-1.19 (m, 11H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.5, 146.6, 141.1, 136.9, 135.9, 133.8, 131.8, 129.5, 129.0, 128.70, 128.67, 128.6, 128.4, 128.0, 127.9, 126.4, 124.0, 71.9, 50.2, 30.1, 30.0, 29.8, 29.2, 29.0, 28.8, 26.7, 26.4, 23.7 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C34H36N4O3S [M+H]+ 581.2586, found 581.2561.

2-(10-azidodec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 7

To a stirred solution of 2-(10-azido-4-(phenylsulfonyl) dec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 5a (27 mg, 0.050 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in methanol (5 mL) was added magnesium turnings (18.3 mg, 0.75mmol, 15 equiv) and crystals of mercuric chloride (1.4 mg, 0.005 mmol, 0.1 equiv) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature (3 h) while monitoring the reaction progress by TLC. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite bed followed by washing with methanol (2 × 10 mL). The filtrate was concentrated under vacuum using rotary evaporator and the resultant crude residue was submitted to gravity-column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with combinations of hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) to afford the pure product 2-(10-azidodec-1-yn-4-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 7 as colorless oil (13.6 mg, 68%); Rf = 0.6 (hexane/ethyl acetate, 4:1); FT-IR: 3301, 3059, 2932, 2093, 1444, 1059, 694 cm−1; 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.37-7.30 (m, 6H), 3.23 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.18-3.15 (m, 1H), 2.74 (ddd, J = 19.6, 6.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (ddd, J = 19.6, 6.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.01 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.92 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 1.59-1.57 (m, 2H), 1.38-1.34 (m, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.4, 145.2, 135.0, 132.5, 129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 128.0, 126.4, 81.5, 70.2, 51.4, 38.7, 32.2, 28.9, 28.7, 26.8, 26.5, 22.8 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z calcd for C25H26N4O [M+H]+ 399.2185, found 399.2192.

2-(4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11-octahydro-[1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a]azecin-5-yl)-4,5-diphenyloxazole 8

The same procedure (Entry 11, Table 1) was used for the preparation of 8: Off-white amorphous solid (9.5 mg, 73%) mp 128-130 °C; Rf = 0.37 (chloroform/MeOH, 4:1); FT-IR: 3059, 2929, 2865, 1444, 1053, 694 cm−1; 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.34-7.26 (m, 6H), 7.13 (s, 1H), 4.17 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H),3.30-3.28 (m, 1H), 3.23-3.19 (m, 1H), 3.14-3.12 (m, 1H), 1.82-1.69 (m, 4H), 1.29-1.18 (m, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.2, 145.2, 144.9, 134.9, 132.5, 128.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.89, 126.3, 121.4, 50.1, 39.8, 33.2, 30.1, 29.7, 28.6, 26.8, 26.1 ppm.

Acknowledgments

The measurement of high resolution mass spectra by Dr. Bo Wang of the Texas A&M University Laboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry is acknowledged. Financial support from the NIH/NIDCR through grant 1RO1DE023206 is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and Notes

  • 1.a Singh MS, Chowdhury S, Koley S. Tetrahedron. 2016;72:5257–5283. [Google Scholar]; b Totobenazara J, Burke AJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;56:2853–2869. [Google Scholar]; b Majumdar KC, Ray Krishanu. Synthesis. 2011:3767–3783. [Google Scholar]; c Hein CC, Liu X-M, Wang D. Pharmaceutical Research. 2008;25:2216–2230. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9616-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Meldal M, Tornøe CW. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:2952–3015. doi: 10.1021/cr0783479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Moses JE, Moorhouse AD. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:1249–1262. doi: 10.1039/b613014n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a Oueis E, Jaspars M, Westwood NJ, Naismith JH. Angew, Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:5842–5845. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601564. For intramolecular click reactions, See. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Arbačiauskienė E, Laukaitytė V, Holzer W, Šackuš A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015:5663–5670. [Google Scholar]; c Chouhan G, James K. Org. Lett. 2013;15:1206–1209. doi: 10.1021/ol303572t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Pasini D. Molecules. 2013;18:9512–9530. doi: 10.3390/molecules18089512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Xiao Y, Zhang L. Org. Lett. 2012;14:4662–4665. doi: 10.1021/ol302102h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Bogdan AR, James K. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4060–4063. doi: 10.1021/ol201567s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g White CJ, Yudin AK. Nat. Chem. 2011;3:509–524. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Chouhan G, James K. Org. Lett. 2011;13:2754–2757. doi: 10.1021/ol200861f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Chandrasekhar S, Rao CL, Nagesh C, Reddy CR, Sridhar B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:5869–5872. [Google Scholar]; j Hotha F, Anegundi RI, Natu AA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:4585–4588. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ray A, Manoj K, Bhadbhade MM, Mukhopadhyay R, Bhattacharjya A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2775–2778. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tiwari VK, Mishra BB, Mishra KB, Mishra N, Singh AS, Chen X. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:3086–3240. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a Wasserman HH, McCarthy KE, Prowse KS. Chem. Rev. 1986;86:845–856. [Google Scholar]; b Evans DA, Nagorny P, Xu R. Org. Lett. 2006;8:5669–5671. doi: 10.1021/ol0624530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patil PC, Luzzio FA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016;57:757–759. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Patil PC, Luzzio FA. J. Org. Chem. 2016 doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01280. DOI: 1010.21/acs.joc.6b01280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a Huisgen R. In: 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry. Padwa E, editor. Wiley; New York: 1984. pp. 1–176. [Google Scholar]; b Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:2596–2599. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::AID-ANIE2596>3.0.CO;2-4. For room temperature click reactions See. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hotha S, Anegundi RI, Natu AA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:4585–4588. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pirali T, Tron GC, Zhu J. Org. Lett. 2006;8:4145–4148. doi: 10.1021/ol061782p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bodin KD, Gin DY, Gin MS. Org. Lett. 2005;7:4479–4482. doi: 10.1021/ol051818y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yap AH, Weinreb SM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:3035–3038. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bahulayan D, Arun S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:2850–2855. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Munster N, Nikodemiak P, Koert U. Org. Lett. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02048. DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett6b02048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jung ME, Piizzi G. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:1735–1766. doi: 10.1021/cr940337h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES