Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Microcirculation. 2009 Feb;16(2):159–166. doi: 10.1080/10739680802353868

Determinants of Retinal Microvascular Architecture in Normal Subjects

ALUN D HUGHES *, TIEN Y WONG , NICHOLAS WITT *, RICHARD EVANS *, SIMON A MCG THOM *, BARBARA E KLEIN , NISH CHATURVEDI *, RONALD KLEIN
PMCID: PMC5603261  NIHMSID: NIHMS900786  PMID: 19206002

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have shown that changes in the retinal microvasculature predict cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, little is known regarding influences on the retinal microvasculature in healthy people without overt cardiovascular or metabolic disease.

Methods

We used a semiautomated computerized technique to analyze digitized retinal photographs from a total of 167 healthy people (age range, 45–75 years; 83 female), without clinical CVD, diabetes, or hypertension, randomly sampled from the population-based Beaver Dam Eye Study. We assessed arteriolar and venular narrowing, arteriolar optimality deviation, and other quantitative aspects of the retinal microvasculature.

Results

Arterioles were significantly narrower and longer, had wider branching angles, and were more tortuous than venules. Increased arteriolar length to diameter ratio (an index of arteriolar narrowing) was positively and independently associated with older age and elevated systolic blood pressure. Arteriolar optimality deviation (an index of microvascular endothelial dysfunction) increased with greater body mass index. Current smoking and increased white blood cell (WBC) count was associated with wider venules. After controlling for smoking, WBC was no longer a significant predictor of venular diameter.

Conclusions

CVD risk factors are associated with retinal microvascular changes in healthy individuals without evidence of CVD, diabetes, or hypertension. CVD risk factors have different influences on the arteriolar and venular bed.

Keywords: retina, microvascular, arterioes, venules


The retinal circulation is closely related to the cerebral circulation and offers a rare opportunity to visualize the arteriolar and venular circulations in man in vivo using noninvasive techniques. Examination of the retinal fundus is commonly used to assess retinal microvascular damage in diabetes and as an indicator of target organ damage in hypertension [9]. Recent studies have shown that the existence of retinopathy and, especially, more quantitative measures of retinal microvascular abnormalities, even in those without diabetes and hypertension, predict incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), including stroke [28,25,18] and ischemic heart disease, [23], heart failure [31], hypertension [32], as well as type 2 diabetes, [33], often independently of other traditionally used risk factors. Nevertheless, it remains unclear to what extent these changes in the retinal microvasculature are simply a late consequence of clinical CVD, and relatively little is known regarding the normal distribution of retinal microvascular geometry and the cardiovascular risk factors influencing these parameters in healthy individuals without overt CVD. Such data are important to determine the extent of early effects of vascular and metabolic risk factors on the microcirculation.

The objective of this study was to use a semiautomated computer-based analysis of retinal photographs to determine the factors influencing the retinal microvasculature in subjects without any evidence of CVD, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus drawn from the population-based Beaver Dam Eye Study.

METHODS

Study Population

The study population was a randomly selected subgroup of the Beaver Dam Eye Study cohort. The Beaver Dam Eye study is a prospective, population-based study, details of which have been published elsewhere. [27]. In brief, a private census of the population of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, USA, was performed from fall 1987 to spring 1988. Of 5924 individuals eligible, 4926 (83%) participated in the baseline examination. A standardized interview and examination was performed at baseline, including questions relating to a history of CVD, medication use, and cigarette smoking. Self-reported smoking was classified as current, ex-, or never smoker and quantified in terms of pack years. Blood pressure (BP) was measured with a random-zero sphygmomanometer, according to the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program protocol [10], and the average of two measurements was used. Nonfasting bloods were obtained from all participants and plasma glycosylated hemoglobin, serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and white blood cell (WBC) count determined, as previously described [27]. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a past history of diabetes or the presence of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin and a random blood sugar >11 mmol/l. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/height2. From this population, we selected a random sample of 167 subjects (83 women) aged <75 years, who had undergone retinal photography and had not experienced a cardiovascular death during a 10-year follow-up period, who had no history of CVD, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus at baseline, and were not receiving medication for any cardiovascular condition (e.g., angina, coronary disease, hypertension, or diabetes).

Image Analysis

Retinal photography techniques and retinal image analysis have been previously described in detail [23,29]. In brief, 30-degree color stereoscopic photographic positives of the ocular fundus centered on the optic disc (field 1) of both eyes were digitized by using a commercial photographic scanner (Nikon LS1000, Nikon UK, Kingston, Surrey, UK) at a resolution of 2700 dpi (yielding images of ~2900 × 2500 pixels). Digitized images were converted to monochrome by the extraction of the green layer the digital red, green, and blue (RGB) images. Retinal microvascular and branching parameters were measured from the digitized images, using a custom written program running within the Matlab programming environment on a personal computer [2]. Measurements were made from at least seven vessel segments and at least five bifurcations in both arterial and venous arcades from each subject. A vessel segment was defined as linking two clearly visible bifurcations, or else traversing a linear distance of at least 1.5 disc diameters (the width of an average optic disc in photographic images) from the optic disc boundary without bifurcating (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Retinal microvascular analysis. The figure shows a typical digitized retinal image viewed in the analysis program after tracking and measurement of several arteriolar trees. An enlargement of one region is shown to illustrate the measured parameters. D0 = parent diameter, D1 = 1st offspring diameter, D2 = 2nd offspring diameter, ω = branching angle, L = vessel segment length.

The analysis was performed on a sequence of complete trees, generally from a single eye, continuing onto the second eye, if necessary, to achieve the required number of vessel segments and bifurcation Vessel path length was measured along the vessel center line between bifurcations. Arteriolar and venular diameters were measured at a series of intensity cross-sections normal to the vessel at two-pixel intervals along the entire length of the vessel segment. At each cross-section, the vessel diameter was measured to subpixel accuracy, using a sliding linear regression filter (SLRF) technique, as previously described [2], and an average was calculated for each vessel. To derive a measure of vessel narrowing that is applicable to both arterioles and venules (unlike the arterio-venous ratio; AVR) and is unaffected by the refractive properties of the eye, we calculated the length-diameter ratio (LDR) of each segment as a measure of arteriolar and venular narrowing [14]. This ratio may have some advantages over AVR, a widely used measure of arteriolar narrowing, in that it is not influenced by concurrent arteriolar and venular changes. Bifurcation angles (ω) were measured as the angle subtended between branches arising from a bifurcation. The relationship of parent to offspring arteriolar diameters was quantified by the optimality deviation—a measure of the extent to which the optimality ratio (γratio) deviates from the theoretically predicted optimum for minimum power losses and uniform shear distribution across bifurcations. Increased deviation is an indicator of microvascular endothelial dysfunction [5]. The γratio was calculated from the parent arteriolar diameter (D0) and the offspring diameters (D1 and D2) as:

Γratio=D13+D232D033

The optimality deviation was calculated as:

Γratio=123

Vessel tortuosity was measured as the difference between the actual path length of the vessel segment (measured by tracking) and the straight line length of the segment, divided by the straight line length. This simple measure of tortuosity does not distinguish between increased length due to bowing and that due to multiple points of inflection, so we also analyzed vessels by using another measure of tortuosity, based on vessel curvature calculated from the integral of the square of curvature along the path of the vessel, normalized by the total path length [6], but since our findings with this alternative measure of tortuosity did not differ substantially from the more simple measure, we have only presented data using the former analysis. AVR was calculated on the basis of the estimated diameters of the central retinal artery (CRAE) and vein (CRVE), as previously described [8,20,21,28].

Statistical Methods

Two group comparisons were performed using a Student’s t-test for paired and unpaired data as appropriate, or in the case of skewed data, the nonparametric equivalents. Regression was performed by using ordinary linear regression or quantile regression for data with non-normally distributed residuals, and findings are presented as regression coefficients (beta) with their respective standard errors (SEs) and P-values. Other data are presented as means (SD) or medians (ranges) for continuous variables or n (%) for categorical variables. The distribution of pack years was normalized by taking log (pack years +1) for purposes of regression. All statistical analysis was performed by using Intercooled Stata 9.2 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1, and retinal measurements are shown in Table 2. There was no gender difference in arteriolar measurements. Women had significantly more acute venular branching angles than men, but no other gender difference was observed (data not shown); consequently, gender-specific analyses are not presented.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Population Studied

Variable All subjects
(n = 167)
Age, years   64 (45–74)
Males, n (%)   84 (50)
SBP, mmHg 126 (16)
DBP, mmHg   75 (10)
BMI, kg/m2   27.8 (5.0)
HbA1c (%)     5.7 (3.1–7.5)
Total cholesterol, mmol/L     6.1 (1.0)
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L     1.3 (0.3–3.7)
WBC, 103 cells/mL     6.5 (5.6–7.7)
Pack years     1.2 (0–132)
Smokers (non/current/ex), n (%)   79 (47)/57(34)/31 (19)

Data are means (SD), medians (ranges), or n (%).

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein, WBC, white blood cell count.

Table 2.

Arteriolar and Venular Parameters in the Population

Variable All subjects (n = 167)
Arterioles
 CRAE, μm   205.4 (20.4)
 Length, μm 1075 (341)
 LDR     14.3 (11.4, 17.8)
ω     69.5 (64.5, 78.3)
Simple tortuosity (×10−2)       0.40 (0.02, 1.1)
Optimality deviation       0.08 (0.03–0.14)
Venules
 CRVE, μm   228.5 (19.1)**
 Length, μm   881 (302)**
 LDR       9.8 (3.5)**
ω     73.5 (66.6,79.2)**
 Simple tortuosity       0.03 (0.00, 0.68)**
Other
 AVRCR       0.90 (0.84,0.95)
 Retinopathy, n (%)       8 (5)
 AV nicking, n (%)       2 (1)

Data are means (SD), medians (ranges), or n (%).

**

P<0.01;

*

P<0.05 comparing arterioles vs. venules.

CRAE/CRVE, estimated diameters of the central retinal artery/vein; LDR, length-diameter ratio; AVR, arterio-venous ratio.

Retinal arterioles were significantly narrower and longer than venules (Table 2), had narrower branching angles, and were more tortuous than venules (Table 2). Arteriolar LDR showed a positive relationship with increasing age and SBP. This observation was consistent with our finding of an inverse relationship between arteriolar diameter (CRAE) and age and SBP (Table 3A). Arteriolar optimality deviation increased with increasing BMI (Table 3A). There were no other significant associations between CVD risk factors and arteriolar parameters.

Table 3A.

Results of Univariate Regression Analysis between Measurements and Retinal Arteriolar Parameters

CRAE Beta (s); P Length Beta (se); P LDR Beta (se); P ω Beta (se); P Optimality deviation Beta (se); P
Age, years −0.18 (0.20); 0.4   13.3 (3.2);<0.001   0.19 (0.05);<0.001 −0.16 (0 .10); 0.12 −0.0005 (0.0009); 0.6
SBP, mmHg −0.35 (0.01);<0.001   3.5 (1.6); 0.03   0.06 (0.02); 0.016 −0.06 (0.05); 0.2 −0.0004 (0.0004); 0.4
BMI, kg/m2 −0.72 (0.31); 0.022   5.4 (5.3); 0.3   0.10 (0.08); 0.2   0.05 (0.17); 0.8   0.0028 (0.0014); 0.04
WBC, 103 cells/mL   1.09 (0.75); 0.15 −4.7 (12.5); 0.7 0.0103 (0.19); > 0.9   0.68 (0.39); 0.08 −0.0007 (0.0033); 0.8
Pack year   0.19 (0 .92); 0.8   19.3 (15.2); 0.2   0.33 (0.23); 0.16 −0.68 (0 .47); 0.16 −0.0052 (0.0039); 0.19
Total cholesterol, mol/L −0.28 (1.53); > 0.9 −9.1 (25.6); 0.7 −0.40 (0.39); 0.3   0.17 (0.79); 0.8   0.0044 (0.0067); 0.5
HDL cholesterol, mol/L   1.14 (3.64); 0.8   43.7 (61.1); 0.5   0.17 (0.93); 0.9 −1.77 (1.92); 0.4 −0.0090 (0.0158); 0.6
HbA1c,% −2.31 (2.26); 0.3 −3.9 (37.9); > 0.9 −0.02 (0.58); > 0.9   0.52 (1.20); 0.7 −0.0166 (0.010); 0.09

Unlike arterioles, venular narrowing (venular LDR) was unrelated to age or blood pressure. Venular diameters (CRVE) also showed no correlation with age or blood pressure. However, venular LDR was inversely related to WBC and to pack years of smoking (Table 3B), and similarly, venular diameter was positively associated with WBC and to pack years of smoking (Table 3B). Venules tended to be wider (nonsmokers CRVE = 225.1 (2.1) vs. current smokers CRVE =230.8 (2.5); P= 0.09, adjusted for age and sex), and venular narrowing was significantly less in current smokers than in nonsmokers (nonsmokers venular LDR =10.5 (0.4) vs. current smokers venular LDR =8.8 (0.5); P = 0.009, adjusted for age and sex).

Table 3B.

Results of Univariate Regression Analysis between Measurements and Retinal Venular Parameters

CRAE Beta (se); P Length Beta (se); P LDR Beta (se); P ω Beta (se); P
Age, years −0.14 (0.19); 0.464     7.5 (2.9); 0.012     0.06 (0 .03); 0.08 −0.14 (0.10); 0.15
SBP, mmHg −0.04 (0.09); 0.705     0.8 (1.5); 0.6   −0.00 (0.02); > 0.9   0.00 (0 .05); 0.927
BMI, kg/m2   0.20 (0 .30); 0.497 −4.3 (4.7); 0.4 −0.099 (0.05); 0.07   0.36 (0.16); 0.023
WBC, 103cells/mL   2.88 (0.66);<0.001 −8.7 (11.1); 0.4   −0.18 (0.09); 0.049 −0.36 (0.37); 0.3
Pack year     1.7 (0.8); 0.047 −26.5 (13.4); 0.05   −0.35 (0.15); 0.026 −0.29 (0.45); 0.5
Total cholesterol, mmol/L   1.07 (1.43); 0.5     4.8 (22.7); 0.8  0.033 (0.26); > 0.9 −0.37 (0 .74); 0.6
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L −5.74 (3.39); 0.09   72.0 (53.6); 0.2     0.95 (0.62); 0.1 −3.24 (1.73); 0.06
HbA1c,% −2.39 (2.11); 0.3 −22.1 (33.6); 0.5   −0.03 (0.39); > 0.9 −0.77 (1.13); 0.5

Analysis was performed by linear regression or ζquantile regression for data with non-normally distributed residuals. Distribution of pack years was normalized by taking log (pack years + 1) for the purposes of regression. There were no significant associations for arteriolar or venular simple tortuosity.CRAE/CRVE, estimated diameters of the central retinal artery; SBP, systolic blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; WBC, white blood cell; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.

In a multivariate model adjusted for sex, both age and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were significant independent, negative correlates of arteriolar narrowing (beta = −0.0010 [0.0003] P = 0.01 and beta = −0.00041 [0.0001] P<0.001, respectively).

After the inclusion of log (pack years +1) in a multivariate model, the relationship between WBC and wider venules was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (pack years beta = 0.007 [0.002]; P = 0.004 and WBC beta = 0.002 [0.002]; P = 0.1; adjusted for age and sex in a multivariate analysis). The association between arteriolar optimality deviation and increasing BMI remained largely unaffected by statistical adjustment for age, sex, BP, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, WBC, and pack years (multivariate adjusted beta = 0.0038 [0.0016]; P = 0.02, including all the above variables).

DISCUSSION

This study compared arterioles and venules in the retinal microvasculature and examined associations with standard cardiovascular risk factors in a community-based sample without any evidence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or CVD and not receiving medication for these diseases.

In this generally healthy population, we observed that retinal arterioles were narrower than venules, had wider branching angles, and were more tortuous, than venules. Most previous studies have examined retinal microvascular changes in the context of disease states, such as hypertension [30], metabolic syndrome [19], or diabetes [4]. Numerous studies have consistently shown that hypertension is associated with retinal arteriolar narrowing, and that the relationship between BP and arteriolar narrowing extends across the range of BP in a population [26]. Our data are in keeping with these previous observations showing that elevated BP was independently associated with evidence of arteriolar narrowing, despite participants having blood pressures in the normotensive range. This finding is also consistent with studies in 6–8-year-old healthy children where arteriolar narrowing was related with higher BP levels, suggesting early pathophysiological effects of blood pressure on microvascular caliber, even in the absence of clinically defined hypertension [17]. Our data indicate that LDR may be a useful means of normalizing vessel diameter, so that it may be relatively independent of refraction, although recent data suggest that the impact of differences in refraction is relatively minor [34]. We believe that it is probably useful to present both uncorrected and length-normalized data in future studies. Our findings, however, emphasize the potential limitations of AVR as a measure of arteriolar narrowing [16], since it fails to take account of independent changes in arteriolar and venular caliber.

Factors influencing the retinal venular circulation differ from those influencing the arteriolar circulation. Until recently, the venular system has not been given much attention. Venular changes were not observed to be related to BP in a large population study, [26] and venular diameter has, therefore, been widely used to normalize arteriolar diameter. However, more recently, it has become clear that venular diameter is affected by disease. Indeed, increased venular diameter, rather than decreased arteriolar diameter, has been reported to be associated with increased risk of stroke [11] and coronary heart disease [24]. It has been proposed that wider venules are an indicator of increased systemic inflammation 12, 15], and our observations support this in showing an association between WBC and venular diameter that appeared to be related to smoking habit. After taking into account smoking in a multivariate model, WBC was no longer a significant predictor of venular narrowing, suggesting that smoking is a closer correlate of chronic inflammation status than a measurement of WBC on a single occasion.

In this study, we also examined possible predictors of optimality deviation, a proposed measure of microvascular endothelial function [5,24]. We showed that increased arteriolar optimality deviation was positively correlated with elevated BMI. Previous studies have reported that obesity is associated with endothelial dysfunction in both the macro- and microvasculature [7,13,22]. Our observations are consistent with these findings in other vascular beds and are in keeping with a generalized adverse effect of obesity on vascular function.

This study had a number of limitations. It was cross-sectional, and consequently, we cannot draw conclusions regarding causality. Subjects were drawn from a limited age range (between 45 and 74 years), and our observations cannot be extrapolated to other age groups. In addition, it is likely that some participants of this age will have undetected or subclinical disease, and this may have influenced some observations. The strengths of the study include the use of a community-based population combined with blinded quantitative assessment of retinal microvascular changes, using a semiautomated approach.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, retinal microvascular changes are evident in normotensive adult subjects without evidence of CVD or diabetes but correlate with known cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., elevated BP, obesity, and smoking). Our data, therefore, suggest that retinal microvascular changes may occur early in the pathoetiology of disease. Further longitudinal studies, particularly in young individuals, would be valuable in establishing if this is the case. Risk factors have differential influences on the retinal arteriolar and venular bed, and it is likely that these changes will have differential prognostic significance for both systemic and ocular diseases.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust. We are grateful to Stacy Meuer and Karl Jensen for their excellent technical assistance with the study. The Beaver Dam Eye Study was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (EY06594 to Ronald Klein and Barbara Klein). Professors Chaturvedi, Hughes, and Thom acknowledge the support of the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Scheme.

References

  • 1.Chapman N, Dell’Omo G, Sartini MS, Witt N, Hughes AD, Thom S, Pedrinelli R. Peripheral vascular disease is associated with abnormal arteriolar diameter relationships at bifurcations in the human retina. Clin Sci (Colch) 2002;103:111–116. doi: 10.1042/cs1030111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chapman N, Witt N, Gao X, Bharath AA, Stanton AV, Thom SA, Hughes AD. Computer algorithms for the automated measurement of retinal arteriolar diameters. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:74–79. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.1.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cheung N, Saw SM, Islam FM, Rogers SL, Shankar A, de H K, Mitchell P, Wong TY. BMI and retinal vascular caliber in children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:209–215. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fong DS, Aiello L, Gardner TW, King GL, Blankenship G, Cavallerano JD, Ferris FL, III, Klein R. Retinopathy in diabetes. Diab Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S84–S87. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Griffith TM, Edwards DH, Davies RLI, Harrison TJ, Evans KT. EDRF coordinates the behaviour of vascular resistance vessels. Nature. 1987;329:442–445. doi: 10.1038/329442a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hart WE, Goldbaum M, Cote B, Kube P, Nelson MR. Measurement and classification of retinal vascular tortuosity. Int J Med Inform. 1999;53:239–252. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00163-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hashimoto M, Akishita M, Eto M, Kozaki K, Ako J, Sugimoto N, Yoshizumi M, Toba K, Ouchi Y. The impairment of flow-mediated vasodilatation in obese men with visceral fat accumulation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:477–484. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, King WN, Clegg LX, Klein R, Cooper LS, Sharrett AR, Davis MD, Cai J. Methods for evaluation of retinal microvascular abnormalities associated with hypertension/sclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2269–2280. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90525-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hughes AD. The clinical assessment of retinal microvascular structure and therapeutic implications. Curr Treat Opt Cardiovasc Med. 2007;9:236–241. doi: 10.1007/s11936-007-0018-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. The hypertension detection and follow-up program. Prev Med. 1976;5:207–215. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(76)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ikram MK, de Jong FJ, Bos MJ, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, de Jong PT, Breteler MM. Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2006;66:1339–1343. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Jong FJ, Ikram MK, Witteman JC, Hofman A, de Jong PT, Breteler MM. Retinal vessel diameters and the role of inflammation in cerebrovascular disease. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:491–495. doi: 10.1002/ana.21129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Jongh RT, Serne EH, IJzerman RG, de V G, Stehouwer CD. Impaired microvascular function in obesity: implications for obesity-associated microangiopathy, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Circulation. 2004;109:2529–2535. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129772.26647.6F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.King LA, Stanton AV, Sever PS, Thom SA, Hughes AD. Arteriolar length-diameter (L:D) ratio: a geometric parameter of the retinal vasculature diagnostic of hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1996;10:417–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klein R, Klein BE, Knudtson MD, Wong TY, Tsai MY. Are inflammatory factors related to retinal vessel caliber? The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:87–94. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liew G, Sharrett AR, Kronmal R, Klein R, Wong TY, Mitchell P, Kifley A, Wang JJ. Measurement of retinal vascular caliber: issues and alternatives to using the arteriole to venule ratio. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:52–57. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mitchell P, Cheung N, de H K, Taylor B, Rochtchina E, Islam FM, Wang JJ, Saw SM, Wong TY. Blood pressure and retinal arteriolar narrowing in children. Hypertension. 2007;49:1156–1162. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.085910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Wong TY, Smith W, Klein R, Leeder SR. Retinal microvascular signs and risk of stroke and stroke mortality. Neurology. 2005;65:1005–1009. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000179177.15900.ca. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nguyen TT, Wong TY. Retinal vascular manifestations of metabolic disorders. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2006;17:262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Parr JC, Spears GF. General caliber of the retinal arteries expressed as the equivalent width of the central retinal artery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77:472–477. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90457-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parr JC, Spears GF. Mathematic relationships between the width of a retinal artery and the widths of its branches. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77:478–483. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90458-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Obesity/insulin-resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction—implications for the syndrome of insulin-resistance. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2601–2610. doi: 10.1172/JCI118709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Witt N, Wong TY, Hughes AD, Chaturvedi N, Klein BE, Evans R, McNamara M, Thom SA, Klein R. Abnormalities of retinal microvascular structure and risk of mortality from ischemic heart disease and stroke. Hypertension. 2006;47:975–981. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000216717.72048.6c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wong TY, Kamineni A, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, Siscovick DS, Cushman M, Duncan BB. Quantitative retinal venular caliber and risk of cardiovascular disease in older persons: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2388–2394. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wong TY, Klein R, Couper DJ, Cooper LS, Shahar E, Hubbard LD, Wofford MR, Sharrett AR. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and incident stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Lancet. 2001;358:1134–1140. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06253-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wong TY, Klein R, Klein BE, Meuer SM, Hubbard LD. Retinal vessel diameters and their associations with age and blood pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4644–4650. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wong TY, Klein R, Klein BE, Tielsch JM, Hubbard L, Nieto FJ. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and their relationship with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;46:59–80. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(01)00234-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wong TY, Klein R, Sharrett AR, Couper DJ, Klein BE, Liao DP, Hubbard LD, Mosley TH. Cerebral white matter lesions, retinopathy, and incident clinical stroke. JAMA. 2002;288:67–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wong TY, Knudtson MD, Klein R, Klein BE, Meuer SM, Hubbard LD. Computer-assisted measurement of retinal vessel diameters in the Beaver Dam Eye Study: methodology, correlation between eyes, and effect of refractive errors. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1183–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wong TY, Mitchell P. The eye in hypertension. Lancet. 2007;369:425–435. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60198-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wong TY, Rosamond W, Chang PP, Couper DJ, Sharrett AR, Hubbard LD, Folsom AR, Klein R. Retinopathy and risk of congestive heart failure. JAMA. 2005;293:63–69. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wong TY, Shankar A, Klein R, Klein BEK, Hubbard LD. Prospective cohort study of retinal vessel diameters and risk of hypertension. Br Med J. 2004;329:79–82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38124.682523.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wong TY, Shankar A, Klein R, Klein BE, Hubbard LD. Retinal arteriolar narrowing, hypertension, and subsequent risk of diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1060–1065. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.9.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wong TY, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Klein R, Mitchell P. Does refractive error influence the association of blood pressure and retinal vessel diameters? The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:1050–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES