Erratum
In the original publication of this article [1] there was 1 incorrect value displayed in Table 1. In this Erratum the incorrect (Table 1 in this Erratum) and correct version of Table 1 are shown (Table 2 in this Erratum). Only a part of Table 1 is shown in this Erratum. The full version of Table 1 is available in the original article. The original publication has been updated with the correct data; the error did not impact the scientific outcome of the study. The publisher apologizes to the authors and readers for the inconvenience.
Table 1.
Original version of Table 1 as published on 15 August 2017
| Study site | Sex | Barromo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. exam. | No. positive | ||
| Community people (14–25 years) | M | 28 | 0 |
| F | 28 | 0 | |
| Total | 53 | 0 | |
Table 2.
Correct version of Table 1, the value 28 has been corrected to 25
| Study site | Sex | Barromo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. exam. | No. positive | ||
| Community people (14–25 years) | M | 28 | 0 |
| F | 25 | 0 | |
| Total | 53 | 0 | |
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s41182-017-0060-y
Reference
- 1.Odongo-Aginya, et al. Wuchereria bancrofti infection at four primary schools and surrounding communities with no previous blood surveys in northern Uganda: the prevalence after mass drug administrations and a report on suspected non-filarial endemic elephantiasis. Trop Med Health. 2017;45:20. doi: 10.1186/s41182-017-0060-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
