Abstract
The branched-chain sugar apiose was widely assumed to be synthesized only by plant species. In plants, apiose-containing polysaccharides are found in vascularized plant cell walls as the pectic polymers rhamnogalacturonan II and apiogalacturonan. Apiosylated secondary metabolites are also common in many plant species including ancestral avascular bryophytes and green algae. Apiosyl-residues have not been documented in bacteria. In a screen for new bacterial glycan structures, we detected small amounts of apiose in methanolic extracts of the aerobic phototroph Geminicoccus roseus and the pathogenic soil-dwelling bacteria Xanthomonas pisi. Apiose was also present in the cell pellet of X. pisi. Examination of these bacterial genomes uncovered genes with relatively low protein homology to plant UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase (UAS). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these bacterial UAS-like homologs belong in a clade distinct to UAS and separated from other nucleotide sugar biosynthetic enzymes. Recombinant expression of three bacterial UAS-like proteins demonstrates that they actively convert UDP-glucuronic acid to UDP-apiose and UDP-xylose. Both UDP-apiose and UDP-xylose were detectable in cell cultures of G. roseus and X. pisi. We could not, however, definitively identify the apiosides made by these bacteria, but the detection of apiosides coupled with the in vivo transcription of bUAS and production of UDP-apiose clearly demonstrate that these microbes have evolved the ability to incorporate apiose into glycans during their lifecycles. While this is the first report to describe enzymes for the formation of activated apiose in bacteria, the advantage of synthesizing apiose-containing glycans in bacteria remains unknown. The characteristics of bUAS and its products are discussed.
Introduction
Apiose (3-C-[hydroxymethyl]-D-erythrofuranose, Api) is a common sugar residue of the plant pectic polymers rhamnogalacturonan-II (RG-II) and apiogalacturonan in vascular plant species [1, 2]. In addition, apiose-containing small secondary metabolites were detected in lichens [3] and in the fungus Morchella conica [4].
In a screen for novel bacterial glycans, we unexpectedly found an apiosyl residue in methanolic extracts of two gram-negative proteobacteria: the alphaproteobacteria Geminicoccus roseus and the gammaproteobacteria Xanthomonas pisi (Fig 1). In addition to apiose we also detected xylose but the latter has been previously described in certain bacteria [5–11].
In plants the activated nucleotide sugar donor used to synthesize apiose-containing glycans is UDP-apiose (UDP-Api). A bifunctional enzyme (UAS) converts UDP-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcA) predominantly to UDP-Api but UDP-xylose (UDP-Xyl) is also made in a ratio close to 2:1. The UAS enzyme was characterized in several plant species and was named UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase [12–15]. UAS belongs to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily, which also includes UDP-xylose synthase (UXS) [16]. UDP-xylose synthase (UXS) was identified in plant, human and bacteria, and this enzyme has a single activity converting UDP-GlcA to UDP-Xyl. Functionally characterized bacterial UXSs [10, 11] belong to nitrogen fixing rhizobium species that symbiotically reside with plants. Another bacterial species that harbors UXS is the common human gut microbial species belonging to Bacteroides [11]. Certain plant pathogenic bacteria like Ralstonia solanacearum also synthesize UDP-Xyl as a byproduct of the related enzyme Rsu4kpxs [9]. Lastly, the common gram-negative bacterial gene ArnA encodes a UDP-GlcA decarboxylase able to form an intermediate UDP-4-keto-L-arabinose [9, 17] on route to the formation of UDP-4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose and UDP-4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose. Interestingly, ArnA can also produce UDP-Xyl as a byproduct [18]. None of the UXS enzymes were demonstrated to have dual activity like UAS.
In an effort to explain the existence of apiose in these bacteria (G. roseus and X. pisi), we searched their genomes for potential genes encoding UAS activity. Using plant UAS as a probe, we identified UAS-like homologous genes from several bacterial species. We show in this report that they are capable of synthesizing UDP-Api from UDP-GlcA. The origin of UAS in these bacteria remains unclear.
Results
Detection of apiose in extracts of G. roseus and X. pisi
Bacteria grown in liquid and agar media were collected and subjected to methanolic extractions. Following chemical hydrolyses, conversion of the monosaccharides to their alditol-sugar derivatives and GC-MS analyses, the methanolic extract revealed a peak that migrated like apiose (Fig 1). The GC chromatogram and the electron impact MS fragmentation pattern of this peak structure was not reported in Bacteria but had all the chromatographic and mass spectral features of an apiose. For example, the peaks at m/z 290 (Fig 1A, insert) suggest a cleavage between C2-C3 of an apiose-derivative. The peaks at m/z 248 and 247 are likely secondary ion fragments due to loss of m/z 42 (ketene) from m/z 290 and 289, respectively. Peaks at m/z 229/230 and 187/188 are due to loss of m/z 60 (acetate) and loss of acetate and ketene (m/z 60 + 42) from m/z 289/290, respectively. The major peak at m/z 188 represents the deuterated form of the acetylated apiose-derivative. No apiose was detected in the organic solvent extracts. By contrast, a small amount of Api was apparent in the cell pellet of X. pisi but not G. roseus (Fig 1). In addition to Api, these extracts also consist of other sugar residues like glucose, galactose, fucose, rhamnose, arabinose, and xylose (Xyl). While both Xyl and Api have similar structures their MS fragmentation patterns differ significantly (Fig 1C).
Because mass spectra are not sufficient to discriminate apiose from its two potential epimers, we sought to further validate the nature of the apiose-like GC-MS peak by identifying genes involved in the formation of the activated sugar.
Identification and phylogeny analysis of bacterial UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase-like homologs
The BLink and BLAST programs [19] were used to identify bacterial proteins in the NCBI non-redundant database that share sequence similarity to functional bacterial UXSs as well as plant UAS. A search in Bacteria for homologs to the amino acid sequence of Arabidopsis AXS/UAS1 (AEC08054.1) identified several candidates in proteobacteria: Candidatus entotheonella, Geminicoccus roseus, Xanthomonas pisi and Yangia pacifica with 43, 46, 48 and 49% sequence identity to Arabidopsis AXS/UAS1, respectively. These bacterial UAS-like gene homologs are named herein bUAS.
An unrooted phylogenetic tree (Fig 2) was generated using Dendroscope [20]. The analysis compared an alignment of amino acid sequences of functional plant and microbial proteins belonging to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) family with the amino acid sequences of the above bacterial UAS (bUAS) proteins. The PRALINE sequence alignment [21] (S1 Fig) included UDP-xylose synthases (UXSs) from plant, mammal and fungi, and two bacterial enzymes; a bifunctional UDP-4-keto-pentose/UDP-xylose synthase (RsU4kpxs) from the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and the C-terminal portion of ArnA that has a UDP-glucuronic acid 4-oxidase-6-decarboxylase activity [9, 17]. UAS, UXS, RsU4kpxs and ArnA are all decarboxylases that contain domains common to all SDRs: a conserved N-terminal Gly-X-X-Gly-X-X-Gly motif (S1 Fig; X = any amino acid) that is proposed to be involved in NAD+ binding and Tyr-X-X-X-Lys motif with an upstream Ser that forms the catalytic site of the SDR family [16, 22, 23]. The bUASs cluster into a group distinct from the clades for bacterial ArnA and the UXSs (Fig 2).
BLAST [19] analyses show X. pisi UAS (XpUAS) protein has 65% sequence identity with the homolog from G. roseus (GrUAS), 64% with that from Y. pacifica (YpUAS) and 44% with that from C. entotheonella (CeUAS). The closest plant homolog to XpUAS belongs to Ornithogalum longibracteatum (sea onion; AMM04380.1) and shares 51% sequence identity to the XpUAS. Similarly, the GrUAS is 47% identical to UAS from the sea grass Zostera marina, and YpUAS is 50% identical to UAS from Vitis vinifera (XP_002270884.1). Because no sea sponge genomes or transcriptomes are available, we cannot infer any relation of CeUAS to that of its host Theonella swinhoei, but its closest plant UAS homolog belongs to Amborella trichopoda (XP_006851788.1) with 44% sequence identity. Examination of the genes flanking bUASs in each of these bacteria revealed that each is flanked by different genes, with no apparent conserved operon.
Employing the phylogeny to assess origins of the bUASs was inconclusive. While the bUASs share a branch in the phylogeny (Fig 2), they have varying sequence identities and no common theme. Additionally, the bUAS sequences are not very identical to plant UAS sequences. It is possible that bUASs originated from a bacterial ancestral gene source, however we cannot exclude the possibility that bUASs came from plant UAS through a gene transfer event. The limited number of bUAS examples prohibits specifying their origin or the evolutionary advantage they confer. Future deposition of additional bacterial sequences will provide a better understanding of the relationship among UASs.
To date there are no reports that bacteria produce apiose [1]. Because we could not determine at the GC-MS level if the pentose was truly apiose or an apiose epimer (for example two possible epimer forms of apiose at C-2 and C-3), and because the metabolic pathway leading to formation of these apiose-like residues was unknown, we decided to clone the genes and determine if the UAS-like homologs are capable of converting UDP-GlcA to UDP-Api, or perhaps utilizing other UDP-sugar uronates, for example UDP-N-acetyl-glucosaminuronic acid (UDP-GlcNAcA) or UDP-galacuronic acid (UDP-GalA). To this end, XpUAS, GrUAS and CeUAS were cloned, expressed in E.coli and then functionally characterized.
Cloning of bUAS and in microbe formation of UDP-apiose
The coding sequences of the selected UAS homologs were cloned into a modified pET28b E. coli expression vector [27]. The bUAS-containing plasmids or empty plasmid (negative control) were then individually transformed into E. coli together with a pCDF plasmid containing the UDP-glucose dehydrogenase [28] that provides the potential UDP-GlcA substrate for bUAS in vivo. Nucleotide sugar-containing extracts from the isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG)-induced E. coli cells were chromatographed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and analyzed by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) in the negative mode. Two peaks eluting at 11.0 and 12.0 min (Fig 3A) were observed in strains harboring the bUAS but not in E. coli cells harboring plasmid control. The mass spectra (Fig 3B) of both peaks showed an [M-H]- ion at m/z 535.0, that gave MS/MS ion fragments at m/z 403.0, 323.0 and 211.0 which are consistent with [UDP-H2O-H]-, [UMP-H]- and [Ura-2H]-, respectively. The m/z 535.0 was not found in control E. coli expressing empty plasmid. Proton NMR (1H NMR) analyses confirmed that the UDP-pentose eluting at 11.0 min was UDP-Api, and not UDP-apiose-epimer. These data suggest that the bUAS enzymes do synthesize UDP-Api.
Characterization of purified recombinant bUAS
To obtain additional evidence for the nucleotide sugar metabolism and the specific UDP-sugar uronate that the bUASs are utilizing to form UDP-Api, the recombinant His6-tagged proteins were solubilized from E. coli cells and purified using nickel-affinity column. The recombinant bUASs migrated on SDS-PAGE with a predicted mass of between 43 and 45 kDa (Fig 4A). Each purified UAS was shown by HILIC-ESI-MS/MS to convert UDP-GlcA to two UDP-pentose products in the presence of NAD+. MS/MS analysis (Fig 4B) of these product peaks (11.0 and 12.0 min) also gave fragment ions at m/z 323.0 that is consistent with [UMP-H]-. Anomeric (H-1) peaks consistent with the presence of UDP-Api and UDP-Xyl were detected in all the 1H NMR spectra when the recombinant enzyme assays were performed in deuterated buffer (Fig 5).
GrUAS was the most highly expressed protein and was thus selected for further characterization. Real time 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the products formed when GrUAS reacts with UDP-GlcA (Fig 6 and S1 Table) confirmed that UDP-Api is the first product formed. GrUAS produces UDP-Api and UDP-Xyl in a ratio of ~1.7: 1.0, which is similar to characterized plant UASs [29–31]. The NMR study with GrUAS also confirmed that some of the UDP-Api is degraded and converted to the apiofuranosyl-1,2-cyclic phosphate during the in vitro reaction (Fig 6); this instability of UDP-apiose is a known phenomenon [29, 31, 32]. No degradation of UDP-Xyl is discernible over the course of the reaction.
The recombinant GrUAS is most active in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0–8.5, at 37°C (Fig 7A and 7B) and exists in solution as a dimer with a predicted size of 84 kDa (Fig 7C). Table 1 shows that GrUAS has a Km of 251 μM similar to that for Spirodela UAS [31], and a Kcat/Km of 60.2 nM s-1, while recombinant Arabidopsis AXS/UAS1 has a reported Km of 7 μM and Kcat/Km of 43 nM s-1 [30]. Previous studies have shown that UAS is inhibited by certain nucleotides and nucleotide sugars, especially UDP-Xyl and UDP-GalA [30, 31]. Table 2 demonstrates that under our assay conditions UDP-Xyl and UDP-GalA inhibited GrUAS activity by 9% and 77%, respectively.
Table 1. Enzymatic properties of recombinant GrUAS.
GrUAS | |
---|---|
Optimal pHa | 7.7–8.1 |
Optimal Temperature (°C)a | 37–42 |
Km (μM)b | 251 ± 44.6 |
Vmax (nM-s-1) | 70.4 ± 4.53 |
kcat (s-1) | 15.1 ± 0.97 |
kcat /Km (nM-s-1) | 60.2 ± 7.05 |
Mass of Active Protein/Dimer (kDa)c | (84.3) |
aOptimal pH was determined using different buffers (Tris-HCl, sodium phosphate, & HEPES; pH range 5.3–10.3). Temperature assays were conducted in Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.9.
bThe data presented are calculated from the average of three experiments.
cThe mass of active GrUAS eluted from Superdex75 gel filtration column (10.53 min) was estimated based on extrapolation of standard protein marker.
Table 2. Effect of nucleotide sugars and nucleotides on recombinant GrUAS activity.
Additive | Relative activity (%)a |
---|---|
Water (Control) | 100 ± 4.8 |
UDP-glucose | 89.1 ± 5.0 |
UDP-galactose | 98.5 ± 4.2 |
UDP-arabinose | 88.5 ± 5.6 |
UDP-xylose | 91.4 ± 5.6 |
UDP-galacturonic acid | 33.4 ± 9.5 |
UDP | 72.6 ± 5.5 |
UMP | 92.6 ± 5.0 |
GDP | 85.2 ± 7.9 |
GMP | 94.3 ± 3.7 |
CDP | 85.3 ± 4.6 |
CMP | 93.8 ± 4.5 |
TDP | 85.0 ± 4.8 |
TMP | 87.9 ± 4.9 |
NADP | 79.6 ± 3.3 |
NADPH | 82.6 ± 0.9 |
NADH | 105.3 ± 1.9 |
aAmounts of unreacted UDP-GlcA were determined by HPLC. The activity is calculated as the average relative amount of UDP-GlcA consumed compared to the control from three experiments.
Transcript analysis of bUAS and detection of UDP-apiose in X. pisi and G. roseus cultures
To investigate if the bUASs are transcribed in these bacteria and if they produce UDP-Api in vivo, cultures of X. pisi and G. roseus were grown in liquid and agar media. Analysis of RNA for bUAS transcript was positive for both species (Fig 8A) albeit at lower amounts when compared with the control transcripts; G. roseus sigma factor RpoD (WP_027134046.1) and X. pisi Sig70 (EGD11293.1). Furthermore, at culture steady state, small amounts of UDP-Api and UDP-Xyl were detected by HILIC-LC-ESI-MS/MS in aqueous extracts of living culture (Fig 8). Together, these data demonstrate that genes encoding bacterial UAS are expressed and the UAS enzymes are functionally active in vivo leading to production of UDP-Api in the specific bacteria tested.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains
Geminicoccus roseus ATCC BAA-1445 (G. roseus) and Xanthomonas pisi ATCC 35936 (X. pisi) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection in Manassas, VA, USA. G. roseus strain was isolated from a marine aquaculture system in Germany [33], and X. pisi strain was isolated from Pisum sativum in Japan [34]. Unless otherwise stated, G. roseus cultures were grown on marine agar (BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 30 oC, and X. pisi cultures grown on nutrient agar (BD Difco) at 25 oC. Liquid cultures were maintained in 125 mL of either marine broth or nutrient broth, shaking at 250 rpm.
Glycosyl residue composition analysis
5 to 7-day-old cultures (30 ml) were centrifuged (10,000 g, 5 min, 4°C) and cell pellets suspended in 10 volumes of cold MeOH:chloroform:H2O (40:40:20, v/v/v). The suspensions were transferred to 15 ml falcon tubes and vortexed for 10 min (30 sec every 2 min, 4°C). The suspensions were centrifuged (10,000g, 5 min, 4°C) and separated into a top methanolic-water phase (termed methanolic), medial interphase (termed pellet) and bottom organic chloroform phase. A portion (20 μl) of the top methanolic fraction was analyzed on HILIC-LC-ESI-MS/MS (see below) and the remainder transferred to a 13 mm borosilicate tube. The bottom chloroform fraction was transferred to a separate tube. The remaining interphase was re-suspended in 2 ml distilled deionized water (DDW) and samples centrifuged (10,000 g 5 min, 4°C). Supernatant was vacuum aspirated, the pellet was again re-suspended in 1 ml DDW and transferred to a new 13 mm borosilicate tube.
The methanolic and organic solvent extracts or cell pellets (~1 mg) were supplemented with myo-Inositol (10 μl of 5 mM solution) as an internal standard, evaporated to dryness at room temperature using a stream of air (REACTIVAP III, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and then hydrolyzed for 1 h at 120°C with 1 ml of 1 M TFA. TFA was removed by evaporation under a stream of air (40°C) and the residue washed with isopropanol (3 x 500 μl). The released monosaccharides were then converted into their corresponding alditol-acetate derivatives according to York et al [35], and the final residue dissolved in acetone (100 μl).
A fraction (1 μl) of each of the alditol-acetate derivative samples was analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC; 7890A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a mass selective detector (EI-MS, Agilent 5975C) and separated over a RTx-2330 fused silica column (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) as previously described [31]. Alditol-acetate derivatives of standard apiose, rhamnose, fucose, ribose, arabinose, xylose, mannose, glucose, and galactose (50 μg each) were prepared under the same conditions as samples. Monosaccharides were identified based on their retention times and their electron impact (EI) mass spectra.
Identification and cloning of CeUAS, GrUAS and XpUAS
The BLASTP program [19] and BLAST Link (BLink) tool were probed to identify bacterial proteins (taxid: 2) in the NCBI non-redundant database that share amino acid sequence homology to the Arabidopsis AXS/UAS1 (NP_180353.1). Analyses of hypothetical proteins belonging to the proteobacteria Candidatus entotheonella, Geminicoccus roseus and Xanthomonas pisi revealed that they share homology to UXS. The predicted protein for XpUAS lacked 38 amino acids at the N-terminal region based on sequence alignment with other UASs. To obtain the entire XpUAS ORF, the X. pisi whole genome shotgun sequence (NZ_JPLE01000032) was used to extend the nucleotide sequence to include 114 nucleotides upstream of the predicted transcript. The nucleotide sequences corresponding to the C. entotheonella and G. roseus proteins and the extended full-length nucleotide sequence for predicted XpUAS were used for primer design and cloning.
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from 5-day-old liquid cultures (3 ml) of G. roseus and X. pisi. Cells were pelleted (14,000 rpm, 1 min) and 200 μl extraction buffer [0.2 M Tris pH 8, 0.25 M NaCl, 25 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1% SDS] added, and the samples were vortexed for 2 min. Samples were spun down (12,000 rpm, 5 min), and 150 μl of supernatant was transferred to a new tube. An equal volume of isopropanol was added, and precipitated gDNA was pelleted (12,000 rpm, 5 min). Supernatant was vacuum aspirated and samples were allowed to dry under laminar flow hood for 20 min. gDNA was re-suspended in 100 μl TE (10 mM Tris pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) and stored at 4°C.
A portion of gDNA (2 μl), dNTP’s (0.2 mM) and 1 unit of Phusion® high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) were mixed with 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primers (IDT, Coralville, IA, USA; S2 Table) and used to amplify GrUAS and XpUAS under the following thermal cycler conditions: one 98°C denaturation cycle for 30 s followed by 25 cycles (each of 8 s denaturation at 98°C; 25 s annealing at 60°C; 30 s elongation at 72°C), and finally termination at 4°C. The PCR product was directly cloned into the E. coli expression vector pET28b modified to contain an N-terminal His6 tag followed by a TEV cleavage site [27].
Because no axenic monoculture of C. entotheonella was available, a synthetic ORF gene corresponding to the nucleotide sequence of CeUAS was obtained (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The ORF was cloned into the modified pET28b expression vector [27], using forward and reverse primers (see S2 Table).
Following cloning of the individual bUAS genes, the plasmids were sequence verified (Georgia Genomics Facility, Athens, GA, USA) and termed, pET28b-TEV-CeUAS.1, pET28b-TEV-GrUAS.1 and pET28b-TEV-XpUAS.1. Their amino acid sequences were deposited in GenBank™ (accession numbers MF191704, MF191705 and MF191706, respectively).
Analysis of nucleotide sugars produced in microbe
Nucleotide sugars from E. coli harboring the expression plasmids were harvested as described [31, 36]. BL21-derived E. coli cells (3 or 60 ml) co-transformed with pCDFDuet-BtbDH and either pET28b-TEV-CeUAS.1, pET28b-TEV-GrUAS.1, pET28b-TEV-XpUAS.1 or empty pET28b vector control were grown in LB medium [1.0% (w/v) Bacto tryptone, 0.5% (w/v) Bacto yeast extract, and 1.0% (w/v) NaCl] supplemented with 35 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 50 μg/ml kanamycin, and 25 μg/ml spectinomycin at 37°C and 250 rpm, induced with Isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG, 0.5 mM) at an OD600 of 0.6 and grown at 30°C for 4 h. In microbe nucleotide sugars were extracted and analyzed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-LC-ESI-MS/MS) as described [31].
His6-tagged protein expression and purification
BL21-derived E. coli cells were transformed with pET28b-TEV-CeUAS.1, pET28b-TEV-GrUAS.1, pET28b-TEV-XpUAS.1, or the empty vector control. The cells were grown at 37°C and 250 rpm for 16 h in 20 ml LB media containing kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (35 μg/ml). A portion (5 ml) of the culture was transferred to fresh 245 ml LB supplemented with antibiotics and grown under the same conditions until its OD600nm was 0.8. IPTG (0.5 mM) was then added to induce expression of the gene, and the culture then grown for an additional 4 h at 30°C and 250 rpm. The induced cultures were cooled on ice and centrifuged (6,000 g, 10 min, 4°C). The cell pellet was suspended in 10 ml lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride]. The cells were ruptured by sonication and proteins were then isolated after centrifugation as described [27]. The final soluble protein fraction (Fraction S20) was collected and kept on ice prior to immediate purification.
The different His6-tagged proteins, including control empty plasmid, were each purified using fast-flow Ni-Sepharose (2 ml resin packed in a 15 x 1 cm polypropylene column; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) as previously described [31], where the purified His6-bUAS-protein eluted in fraction E7 and had activity. The active enzymes were dialyzed (6,000–8,000 molecular weight cut-off; Spectrum Laboratories Inc, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) at 4°C three times for a total of 2 h against 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, containing 0.15 M NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 10 μM NAD+. The dialysates were divided into 150 μμl aliquots, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Aliquots of purified protein were assayed for activity and analyzed on SDS-PAGE.
SDS-PAGE was performed with 12% (w/w) polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were stained with 0.1% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 in aqueous (aq.) 20% methanol (MeOH) containing 7% (v/v) acetic acid and de-stained with aq. 20% methanol containing 7% (v/v) acetic acid. Protein concentrations were determined with the Bradford reagent [37] using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard, and the molecular mass of active recombinant GrUAS was estimated by size-exclusion chromatography as previously described [31].
Recombinant bUAS enzyme assays
Unless otherwise indicated, the 50 μl reactions were performed in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9, containing 1 mM NAD+, 1 mM UDP-GlcA, and up to10 μg of purified protein. The assay mixtures were incubated at 37°C for up to 45 min and the reactions terminated by placing the tubes in boiling water for 2 min followed by the addition of an equal volume of chloroform. The suspensions were vortexed and centrifuged (12,000 g, 5 min, 22°C), and the aqueous phase analyzed for nucleotide sugars. 1H NMR assays were performed in deuterium oxide (D2O) using 30 μg purified protein in final volume of 180 μl.
Characterization of recombinant GrUAS
GrUAS activity was assayed in different buffers, at different temperatures and with various additives and nucleotide sugars. For pH studies, reactions in total volume of 50 μl consisted of purified recombinant GrUAS (10 μg), 1 mM NAD+, 1 mM UDP-GlcA and various pH buffers (100 mM) and kept at 37°C for 30 min. Inhibition assays were performed by first supplementing the standard reaction mixtures with various nucleotides and nucleotide sugars, addition of purified protein and incubation. The amounts of reactants and products were determined by UV spectroscopy and used to calculate enzyme activity as follows. The products from each recombinant enzyme assay were chromatographed over a column (200 x 1 mm) packed with 15 μm Source 15Q anion exchange resin (GE Healthcare) by elution with a linear gradient (5 mM to 0.6 M) of ammonium formate over 25 min at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min using an Agilent 1100 Series HPLC equipped with an G1313A auto-sampler, a G1315B diode array detector, and ChemStation software. Nucleotides and nucleotide sugars were detected by their A261nm (for UDP-sugars) and A259nm (for NAD+). The concentrations of reactants and products were determined by comparison of their peak areas to a calibration curve of standard UDP-GlcA [9].
Selected kinetic parameters of recombinant GrUAS (10 μg) were determined by varying the concentrations of UDP-GlcA in 50 μl reactions consisting of 1 mM NAD+ in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9. Reactions were kept for 7 min at 37°C quenched with an equal volume of chloroform and then vortex mixed. The reaction products in the aqueous phase were separated using a Q-15 anion exchange column as described above and reaction rates calculated from the depletion of the UDP-GlcA signal integral normalized to the NAD+ signal integral. Values from three independent replicates were used to generate a non-linear regression plot and resultant data using GraphPad Prism Version 7.
HILIC-LC-ESI-MS/MS
ESI-MS/MS analysis was performed on a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) LC-ESI-MS-IT-TOF operating in the negative ion mode. Methanolic extracts, in microbe and recombinant enzyme assay products were mixed with 2/3 volume aq. 95% acetonitrile (ACN) containing 25 mM ammonium acetate and an aliquot (10–20 μl) chromatographed over an Accucore amide-HILIC column (150 x 4.6 mm; Thermo), eluted at 0.4 ml min-1 with a linear gradient of aq. 75% (v/v) acetonitrile containing 40 mM ammonium acetate, pH 4.4, to 50% (v/v) acetonitrile containing 40 mM ammonium acetate, pH 4.4, over 35 min using a Shimadzu LC-30AD HPLC. Mass spectra (mass range 100–2,000 m/z) were collected every 1.3 sec for 30 minutes. Second stage MS/MS data was collected by collision-induced dissociation (CID) with a collision energy of 35% and a nebulizing nitrogen gas flow of 1.5 ml min-1 (59).
Real-time 1H and NMR enzyme assays
All spectra were obtained using a Varian Inova 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 3 mm cryogenic probe. Continuous 1H and 2-D HSQC NMR spectroscopic monitoring of reactions (180 μl volume) were carried out at 37°C in a mixture of D2O/H2O (9:1, v/v) containing 0.83 mM 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate (DSS, internal reference), 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 1 mM UDP-GlcA or 13C6-labeled UDP-GlcA, 1 mM NAD+ and purified recombinant enzyme. One-dimensional 1H NMR spectra with the water resonance signal pre-saturated were collected 5 minutes post addition of enzyme in order to optimize spectrometer settings, and then spectra were continuously averaged every 2.5 min for up to 8 h. All chemical shifts are referenced to DSS at 0.00 ppm [29].
RNA isolation and RT-PCR
RNA was extracted [38] from a 5-day-old culture of G. roseus and a 2-day-old culture of X. pisi grown in liquid media. A 3 ml portion of liquid culture was centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 1 min, 22°C); supernatant discarded; and the cells were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until extraction. Cell pellets were re-suspended in 400 μl TE-lysozyme (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml lysozyme; Sigma L6876), vortexed at room temperature for 10 min; and extraction was carried out after addition of 40 μl of fresh 10X EB (0.3 M NaOAc, pH 5.2, 5% sarkosyl, w/v, 50 mM EDTA, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, v/v) and incubation at 65°C and mixing for 3 min. Subsequently, 440 μl of preheated acidic phenol was added, and samples incubated at 65°C while mixed by vortex for 7 min. Sample was then placed on ice for 3 min and centrifuged (10,000 g 5 min, 4°C). The top 350 μl of the aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and an equal volume of chloroform added. Sample was vortexed for 1 min, incubated at room temperature for 7 min and then centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 5 min, 22°C). The top 200 μl of the aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube mixed with 200 μl of cold isopropanol and placed at -20°C overnight. Sample was then centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, 4°C) and the pellet was re-suspended in 75% ethanol, again centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, 4°C) and supernatant aspirated. Tubes were left open under laminar flow hood for 15 min to dry. Resulting nucleic acids were re-suspended in 40 μl sterile, deionized distilled water (DDW) and RNA concentration measured with a nanodrop (Thermo). To digest remnant genomic DNA, 2 μg of RNA was DNAse treated according to manufacturer guidelines (Thermo). Following DNA digest (37°C for 30 min) an equal volume of chloroform was added and mixed. Sample was centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 5 min, 22°C) and top aqueous phase transferred to a new tube. RNA (0.5 μg) was then reverse transcribed with a random hexamer primer (Thermo) using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA). A portion of the reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction (2 μl), dNTP’s (0.2 mM) and 1 unit of Phusion® high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) were mixed with 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primers (IDT; S2 Table) and used to amplify GrUAS, XpUAS, G. roseus sigma factor RpoD (GrRpoD) and X. pisi sigma factor 70 (XpSig70) with the following thermal cycler conditions: one 98°C denaturation cycle for 30 s followed by 25 cycles (each of 8 s denaturation at 98°C; 25 s annealing at 60°C; 30 s elongation at 72°C), and finally termination at 4°C.
Discussion
This report is the first to describe the sugar apiose in Bacteria, and subsequently this study led us to identify functional genes responsible for synthesizing the activated donor UDP-apiose in prokaryotes. The activity of recombinant bacterial UDP-apiose synthase (bUAS) is specific and utilizes only UDP-glucuronic acid as a substrate.
The bacterial species appearing to contain a UAS were isolated from various sources, including soil and sea. The organization of the operons harboring bUAS in these bacteria is not conserved. The genes flanking bUAS are also not conserved. In contrast, the organizations of bacterial operons that carry out synthesis of other sugar nucleotides are conserved, for example dTDP-rhamnose [39–41]. Thus the ancestral origin of the bUAS remains somewhat elusive. Based on the current genomic database, to date, only 8 bUASs exist, but this number will likely increase as more marine bacteria are sequenced. Since the UAS belonging to the obligate endosymbiotic C. entotheonella shares less than 60% amino acid sequence identity with the other bUASs in this study, it is possible that there was no one single ancestral gene that gave rise to all of the bUASs. One possibility based on the limited sequences is that a duplication and sequence alteration of bacterial UXS or ArnA gave rise to these bUASs. However, one cannot rule out the possibility that early plant-derived UAS is the gene source for bUAS. Regardless of how or where they evolved, bUASs have the same catalytic domains and utilize the same chemistry as plant UASs (S1 Fig).
The bUASs are phylogenetically distinct from other short-chain decarboxylase/reductases (SDRs) and share a branch with functional plant UASs (Fig 2) All domains of life possess enzymes (UXSs) that convert UDP-GlcA to UDP-Xyl [10, 16, 42–44], while UAS appears to be limited to plants and now Bacteria. Only a select few prokaryotic species appear to contain apiose based on the presence of bUAS, suggesting it is advantageous for these organisms’ survival in their specific niche environments. Further support for this hypothesis is evidenced by the presence of UXS in the genomes of G. roseus, C. entotheonella and Y. pacifica, suggesting that these microbes require bUAS specifically for UDP-Api (not UDP-Xyl) synthesis.
The apiose residue observed in the methanolic extracts of G. roseus and X. pisi as well as the cell pellet fraction of X. pisi is likely to be incorporated as a secondary metabolite and potentially a cell wall glycan in X. pisi. Because no Api was detected in the chloroform-extracted fractions of culture, it is unlikely that the final Api residue is part of a glycolipid. Our previous work had shown that in green algae and basal land plants, Api residues also associated with secondary metabolites [31]. In vascular plants Api is present in the cell wall rhamnogalacturonan-II and apiogalacturonan and in secondary metabolites [1, 45–47]. It is therefore possible that these organisms share a related family of apioside metabolites.
The identification and functional characterization of bUAS reveals a new metabolic pathway of UDP-GlcA metabolism by which select microbes have adapted to compete within their local environments. Our results provide important tools for the future study of apiose and apiosides in bacteria. Continued study of the pathways leading to apiosylated metabolites in bacteria will uncover new and interesting glycosyltransferase activities valuable to carbohydrate research.
Supporting information
Abbreviations
- Api
apiose
- Xyl
xylose
- GlcA
glucuronic acid
- UAS
UDP-apiose synthase
- HILIC
hydrophilic interaction chromatography
- ESI
electrospray ionization
- MeOH
methanol
- ACN
acetonitrile
- UXS
UDP-xylose synthaseRsU4kpxs
- UDP-4-keto-pentose
UDP-xylose synthase
- Gr
G. roseus
- Ce
C. entotheonella
- Xp
X. pisi
- BtbDH
UDP-Glc dehydrogenase coding sequence from B. thuringiensis
- IPTG
isopropyl -D-thiogalactoside
- GalA
galacturonic acid
- TEV
tobacco etch virus
- EI
electron ionization
- XIC
extracted ion chromatogram.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequence files are available from the GenBank database (accession numbers MF191704, MF191705 and MF191706).
Funding Statement
The authors acknowledge the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy through Grant DE-FG02-12ER16324 (M.A.O and M.B-P.) for funding studies of Apiose synthesis. We also acknowledge the U.S. Department of Energy-funded Center for Plant and Microbial Complex Carbohydrates (Grant DE-FG02-93ER20097) for equipment support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Picmanova M, Moller BL. Apiose: one of nature's witty games. Glycobiology. 2016;26(5):430–42. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cww012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O'Neill MA, Albersheim P, Darvill AG. The pectic polysaccharides of primary cell walls In: D.M. D, editor. Methods in Plant Biochemistry. 2 ed. London: Academic Press; 1990. p. 415–41. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rezanka T, Guschina IA. Glycosidic compounds of murolic, protoconstipatic and allo-murolic acids from lichens of Central Asia. Phytochemistry. 2000;54(6):635–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zheng S, Gao L, Kang S, Shen X, Wang X. Studies on the two new stereo-saponins from Morchella conica. Indian J Chem Sect B. 1998;37:825–7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Isogai E, Isogai H, Kurebayashi Y, Ito N. Biological activities of leptospiral lipopolysaccharide. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1986;261(1):53–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knirel YA. Polysaccharide antigens of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1990;17(4):273–304. doi: 10.3109/10408419009105729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bystrova OV, Knirel YA, Lindner B, Kocharova NA, Kondakova AN, Zahringer U, et al. Structures of the core oligosaccharide and O-units in the R- and SR-type lipopolysaccharides of reference strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa O-serogroups. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006;46(1):85–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2005.00004.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fletcher CM, Coyne MJ, Bentley DL, Villa OF, Comstock LE. Phase-variable expression of a family of glycoproteins imparts a dynamic surface to a symbiont in its human intestinal ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(7):2413–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608797104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gu X, Glushka J, Yin Y, Xu Y, Denny T, Smith J, et al. Identification of a bifunctional UDP-4-keto-pentose/UDP-xylose synthase in the plant pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum strain GMI1000, a distinct member of the 4,6-dehydratase and decarboxylase family. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(12):9030–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.066803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gu X, Lee SG, Bar-Peled M. Biosynthesis of UDP-xylose and UDP-arabinose in Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021: first characterization of a bacterial UDP-xylose synthase, and UDP-xylose 4-epimerase. Microbiology. 2011;157(Pt 1):260–9. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.040758-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Coyne MJ, Fletcher CM, Reinap B, Comstock LE. UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylases of Bacteroides fragilis and their prevalence in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(19):5252–9. doi: 10.1128/JB.05337-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grisebach H, Döbereiner U. The biosynthesis of apiose in parsley. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1964;17(6):737–41. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sandermann H Jr., Tisue GT, Grisebach H. Biosynthesis of D-apiose. IV. Formation of UDP-apiose from UDP-D-glucuronic acid in cell-free extracts of parsley (Apium petroselinum L.) and Lemna minor. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1968;165(3):550–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ortmann R, Sutter A, Grisebach H. Purification and properties of UDP-apiose: 7-O-(-D-glucosyl)-flavone apiosyltransferase from cell suspension cultures of parsley. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1972;289(2):293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yin S, Kong JQ. Transcriptome-guided gene isolation and functional characterization of UDP-xylose synthase and UDP-D-apiose/UDP-D-xylose synthase families from Ornithogalum caudatum Ait. Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35(11):2403–21. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2044-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harper AD, Bar-Peled M. Biosynthesis of UDP-xylose. Cloning and characterization of a novel Arabidopsis gene family, UXS, encoding soluble and putative membrane-bound UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase isoforms. Plant Physiol. 2002;130(4):2188–98. doi: 10.1104/pp.009654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Breazeale SD, Ribeiro AA, McClerren AL, Raetz CR. A formyltransferase required for polymyxin resistance in Escherichia coli and the modification of lipid A with 4-Amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose. Identification and function oF UDP-4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(14):14154–67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414265200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Polizzi SJ, Walsh RM Jr., Peeples WB, Lim JM, Wells L, Wood ZA. Human UDP-alpha-D-xylose synthase and Escherichia coli ArnA conserve a conformational shunt that controls whether xylose or 4-keto-xylose is produced. Biochemistry. 2012;51(44):8844–55. doi: 10.1021/bi301135b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huson DH, Scornavacca C. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol. 2012;61(6):1061–7. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Simossis VA, Heringa J. PRALINE: a multiple sequence alignment toolbox that integrates homology-extended and secondary structure information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W289–94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kavanagh KL, Jornvall H, Persson B, Oppermann U. Medium- and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase gene and protein families: the SDR superfamily: functional and structural diversity within a family of metabolic and regulatory enzymes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(24):3895–906. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8588-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yin Y, Huang J, Gu X, Bar-Peled M, Xu Y. Evolution of plant nucleotide-sugar interconversion enzymes. PLoS One [Internet]. 2011. 3220709]; 6(11):[e27995 p.]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22125650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539 doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McWilliam H, Li W, Uludag M, Squizzato S, Park YM, Buso N, et al. Analysis tool web services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Web Server issue):W597–600. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li W, Cowley A, Uludag M, Gur T, McWilliam H, Squizzato S, et al. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W580–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang T, Bar-Peled L, Gebhart L, Lee SG, Bar-Peled M. Identification of galacturonic acid-1-phosphate kinase, a new member of the GHMP kinase superfamily in plants, and comparison with galactose-1-phosphate kinase. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(32):21526–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.014761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Broach B, Gu X, Bar-Peled M. Biosynthesis of UDP-glucuronic acid and UDP-galacturonic acid in Bacillus cereus subsp. cytotoxis NVH 391–98. FEBS J. 2012;279(1):100–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08402.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guyett P, Glushka J, Gu X, Bar-Peled M. Real-time NMR monitoring of intermediates and labile products of the bifunctional enzyme UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase. Carbohydr Res. 2009;344(9):1072–8. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.03.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Molhoj M, Verma R, Reiter WD. The biosynthesis of the branched-chain sugar D-apiose in plants: functional cloning and characterization of a UDP-D-apiose/UDP-D-xylose synthase from Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003;35(6):693–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith J, Yang Y, Levy S, Adelusi OO, Hahn MG, O'Neill MA, et al. Functional Characterization of UDP-apiose Synthases from Bryophytes and Green Algae Provides Insight into the Appearance of Apiose-containing Glycans during Plant Evolution. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(41):21434–47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.749069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Choi SH, Mansoorabadi SO, Liu YN, Chien TC, Liu HW. Analysis of UDP-D-apiose/UDP-D-xylose synthase-catalyzed conversion of UDP-D-apiose phosphonate to UDP-D-xylose phosphonate: implications for a retroaldol-aldol mechanism. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(34):13946–9. doi: 10.1021/ja305322x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Foesel BU, Gossner AS, Drake HL, Schramm A. Geminicoccus roseus gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic phototrophic Alphaproteobacterium isolated from a marine aquaculture biofilter. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2007;30(8):581–6. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2007.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K, Swings J. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:472–89. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rezanka T, Nedbalova L, Kolouchova I, Sigler K. LC-MS/APCI identification of glucoside esters and diesters of astaxanthin from the snow alga Chlamydomonas nivalis including their optical stereoisomers. Phytochemistry. 2013;88:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang T, Bar-Peled Y, Smith JA, Glushka J, Bar-Peled M. In-microbe formation of nucleotide-sugars in engineered Escherichia coli. Anal Biochem. 2012;421(2):691–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.12.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li Z, Hwang S, Bar-Peled M. Discovery of a Unique Extracellular Polysaccharide in Members of the Pathogenic Bacillus That Can Co-form with Spores. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(36):19051–67. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.724708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Macpherson DF, Manning PA, Morona R. Characterization of the dTDP-rhamnose biosynthetic genes encoded in the rfb locus of Shigella flexneri. Mol Microbiol. 1994;11(2):281–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Robertson BD, Frosch M, van Putten JP. The identification of cryptic rhamnose biosynthesis genes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and their relationship to lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(22):6915–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marolda CL, Valvano MA. Genetic analysis of the dTDP-rhamnose biosynthesis region of the Escherichia coli VW187 (O7:K1) rfb gene cluster: identification of functional homologs of rfbB and rfbA in the rff cluster and correct location of the rffE gene. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(19):5539–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gotting C, Kuhn J, Zahn R, Brinkmann T, Kleesiek K. Molecular cloning and expression of human UDP-D-xylose:proteoglycan core protein beta-d-xylosyltransferase and its first isoform XT-II. J Mol Biol. 2000;304(4):517–28. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kuhn J, Gotting C, Schnolzer M, Kempf T, Brinkmann T, Kleesiek K. First isolation of human UDP-D-xylose: proteoglycan core protein beta-D-xylosyltransferase secreted from cultured JAR choriocarcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(7):4940–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005111200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kobayashi M, Nakagawa H, Suda I, Miyagawa I, Matoh T. Purification and cDNA cloning of UDP-D-glucuronate carboxy-lyase (UDP-D-xylose synthase) from pea seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43(11):1259–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Darvill AG, McNeil M, Albersheim P. Structure of plant cell walls: VIII. A new pectic polysaccharide. Plant Physiol. 1978;62(3):418–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Watson RR, Orenstein NS. Chemistry and biochemistry of apiose. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1975;31:135–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Beck E, Hopf H. Branched-chain sugars and sugar alcohols In: D.M. D, editor. Methods in Plant Biochemistry. 2 ed. London: Academic Press; 1990. p. 235–89. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequence files are available from the GenBank database (accession numbers MF191704, MF191705 and MF191706).