SUMMARY
The incidence of azole resistance in Aspergillus species has increased over the past years, most importantly for Aspergillus fumigatus. This is partially attributable to the global spread of only a few resistance alleles through the environment. Secondary resistance is a significant clinical concern, as invasive aspergillosis with drug-susceptible strains is already difficult to treat, and exclusion of azole-based antifungals from prophylaxis or first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis in high-risk patients would dramatically limit drug choices, thus increasing mortality rates for immunocompromised patients. Management options for invasive aspergillosis caused by azole-resistant A. fumigatus strains were recently reevaluated by an international expert panel, which concluded that drug resistance testing of cultured isolates is highly indicated when antifungal therapy is intended. In geographical regions with a high environmental prevalence of azole-resistant strains, initial therapy should be guided by such analyses. More environmental and clinical screening studies are therefore needed to generate the local epidemiologic data if such measures are to be implemented on a sound basis. Here we propose a first workflow for evaluating isolates from screening studies, and we compile the MIC values correlating with individual amino acid substitutions in the products of cyp51 genes for interpretation of DNA sequencing data, especially in the absence of cultured isolates.
KEYWORDS: Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus niger, azole drug resistance, diagnostics, cyp51A, cyp51B, cyp51C, efflux, tandem repeats
INTRODUCTION
Inhalation of Aspergillus spores, primarily of the species Aspergillus fumigatus, might result in different clinical manifestations. Whereas sequelae are usually absent in a healthy host, frequent exposure to spores might foster the development of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in individuals with an atopic disposition. Cavitary lung disease, e.g., following tuberculosis, might predispose individuals to aspergilloma. Chronic necrotizing aspergillosis is predominantly observed in patients who suffer from chronic lung disease or mild immunosuppression. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is the most dangerous and life-threatening clinical manifestation and might result from Aspergillus exposure in heavily immunosuppressed patients (1). In fact, Aspergillus spp., primarily A. fumigatus, are the most common emerging fungal pathogens, especially in patients with malignant hematological diseases who are undergoing intensive chemotherapy or after allogeneic hematologic stem stell transplantation. Consequently, prolonged neutropenia (<500 cells/μl for more than 10 days) has been identified as a major risk factor (1).
Over time, several azole-based antimycotic drugs have been developed, among which itraconazole (ITZ), voriconazole (VRZ), posaconazole (PSZ), and (lately) isavuconazole (ISAZ) are mainly used for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of aspergilloses (Fig. 1). Azoles are steric inhibitors of sterol 14α-demethylase enzymes catalyzing a critical step in ergosterol biosynthesis (Fig. 2A and B).
FIG 1.
Chemical structures of clinically used azole antifungals. Azoles are characterized by five-atom heterocycles which contain at least one nitrogen atom (red). Compounds containing moieties with two nitrogen atoms are called diazoles, and those with three nitrogen atoms are called triazoles. Recently marketed antifungals contain one (B and D) or more (A, C, E, and F) triazole moieties and a benzene ring substituted with fluorine (A to C and F) rather than chlorine (D and E). Triazole antifungals are derivatives of either fluconazole (A to C) or ketoconazole (D to F) as the lead compound. This correlates with cross-resistance phenotypes observed in clinical and environmental isolates (see the text).
FIG 2.
Azole antifungal drug resistance mechanisms in fungal cells. (A) A. fumigatus, including the cell wall (CW) and the cytoplasmic membrane (CM), in the absence of azoles. Cyp51 activity is required for the biosynthesis of the membrane compound ergosterol (green). The abcA, cdr1B, and mdr1 genes encode efflux pumps, which are localized in the plasma membrane. These genes are regulated by different transcription factors (TF), such as AtrR. (B) In the presence of azoles, some drug molecules can be pumped out through efflux pumps, but intracellular levels are sufficient to inhibit Cyp51A, resulting in decreased amounts of ergosterol in the membrane. (C) Mutations in cyp51A (asterisk) can reduce target binding of the antifungal drug, therefore conferring resistance. (D) Overexpression of the drug target Cyp51A can be mediated by mutations in the HAP complex (HAP*) or by different kinds of tandem repeats within the promoter region of cyp51A. (E) Increased expression of efflux pumps, such as AbcA, Cdr1B, and Mdr1, increases the drug tolerance of A. fumigatus. Possible mechanisms for increased transcription may be gain-of-function mutations in the regulating transcription factors (TF*, AtrR*).
The infection-related mortality rates are still exceptionally high, despite recent improvements in prophylaxis, early diagnosis, and antifungal treatment of the disease (2). The incidence of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. has increased over the past years, additionally jeopardizing the outcomes for high-risk populations by failure of azole-based prophylaxis and first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis.
Starting with the initial observation in a Dutch strain collection that over the 1990s numbers of azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAf) had increased unproportionally due to a single resistance allele (3), the same has now been demonstrated on a global level (4). Different patterns of resistance are seen, with multiazole and pan-azole resistance being more common than resistance to a single triazole. A variety of mutations in the coding region of cyp51A (Fig. 2C), a gene encoding a sterol 14α-demethylase in A. fumigatus, as well as tandem repeats of 34, 46, and 53 bp upstream in its promoter region (Fig. 2E), have been found to confer, or at least to correlate with, various degrees of drug resistance. Today, the most frequently observed resistance allele consists of a 34-bp tandem repeat in the promoter region of cyp51A combined with the L98H substitution (TR34/L98H). This allele confers high ITZ resistance and various levels of cross-resistance to other azoles. Together with strains carrying a TR46 allele in conjunction with Y121F and T289A exchanges, such strains are thought to spread globally through the environment (5), potentially propagated by the use of 14α-demethylase inhibitor (DMI) fungicides in agriculture. In fact, for many plant-pathogenic fungi, similar resistance mechanisms toward agricultural azole-based fungicides are observed (6–10), and their spread to the level of complete replacement of susceptible strains in some regions (11, 12) is a much discussed topic in phytopathology. The best-studied example is the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici, in which the cyp51B paralog has evolved several resistance mutations in both promoter and coding regions as a result of azole selection (for an overview, see reference 12).
Resistant Aspergillus strains present in the environment are thought to exogenously colonize or infect susceptible hosts. These observations are of significant concern, as exclusion of azole-based antifungals from prophylaxis or first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis dramatically limits treatment options (4). A careful reevaluation of remaining management options for invasive aspergillosis caused by azole-resistant strains by an international expert panel suggested that, in initial therapy, the environmental prevalence of azole-resistant strains should be considered in areas where the prevalence reaches 10% (13, 14). For example, this may be done by combining VRZ with an echinocandin or liposomal amphotericin B (13, 15).
In about 20 to 50% of azole-resistant clinical A. fumigatus isolates, no mutations within the cyp51A locus are observed (16–18); therefore, additional pathways and factors that confer secondary resistance must exist. In this context, only the HAP complex member hapE (CCAAT binding complex [CBC]) has been implicated in clinical ARAf so far (19, 20). Additionally, drug efflux has been discussed to contribute to resistance (17, 21, 22). Hence, different azole resistance patterns may be multifactorial, and this must also be considered when encountering isolates with an altered cyp51 sequence (23).
The molecular detection of genetic alterations leading to azole resistance is gaining importance, given the poor culture-based diagnostic yield for clinical specimens from hematological patients. From a clinical point of view, azole resistance is associated with therapeutically relevant azole treatment failure that is increasingly reported and plays a more and more important role, especially in hematology and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, leading to high mortality rates (24–27).
There is an ongoing debate as to how epidemiologic thresholds should be generated and to what degree laboratory findings of azole resistance in A. fumigatus outside invasive aspergillosis should be reported to clinicians (28). Nevertheless, it is evident that medium- to large-scale environmental and clinical screening studies are urgently needed to generate epidemiologic data to reassess clinical treatment options on local or national levels. Molecular analysis of such isolates is not readily available to most diagnostic laboratories and is far from being standardized. Therefore, we outline here a stepwise workflow for evaluating isolates from such screening studies to build up local epidemiologic data (Fig. 3). Furthermore, we created an annotated reference sequence for easy identification of known polymorphisms in A. fumigatus Cyp51A, in accordance with their recently proposed unified nomenclature (29), and compiled the MIC values correlating with individual Cyp51A amino acid substitutions. This should aid in the interpretation of DNA sequencing data, especially in the absence of a culture isolate.
FIG 3.
Potential sampling workflow for ARAf screening studies. No standardized scheme for conducting screening studies is established yet, but combining several approaches proposed in the literature gives rise to an efficient workflow that eliminates false-positive results and yields robust numbers on the prevalence and phylogenetic cohesion of resistant isolates.
SCREENING FOR AZOLE-RESISTANT ASPERGILLUS STRAINS
Clinical guidelines, e.g., by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) (30, 31), do not specify laboratory testing procedures but rather reference the general literature on the isolation of Aspergillus from respiratory tract specimens (32, 33).
Only recently has it been recommended “…to test different, up to five, colonies as different azole susceptibility phenotypes might be present in a single culture” (13). Indeed, rapid conidial dispersion is a key feature of Aspergillus spp., especially A. fumigatus (34). This allows the fungi to rapidly colonize fresh materials and, presuming a certain selective pressure in the environment, also explains the rapid clonal expansion of resistance phenotypes (35) and makes mixed samples very likely. Dissemination of resistant isolates is also directly propagated by human activities (36).
A very educative experiment highlighting how easily conidia of A. fumigatus are moved through the air was conducted by Kwon-Chung and Sugui (34). In their setup, fresh agar plates were kept next to a sporulating A. fumigatus culture plate. Compared to growth in the same setup with A. nidulans, growth was observed on the fresh plates in a very rapid fashion, despite all attempts to keep the environment free of air movement. The lecture to be taken here with respect to laboratory work is that, when handling aspergilli, especially A. fumigatus, working in the best possible sterile environment free of air movement is highly advisable to avoid cross-contamination between samples and/or cultures. In addition, both environmental and clinical samples may contain susceptible along with resistant fungal material (37, 38). This leads to a reduced detection rate for resistant strains under regular culture conditions in cases where susceptible fungal cells pose the majority of the inoculum. In such cases, additional use of screening agars with included antifungal drugs may be highly beneficial to suppress the growth of most susceptible strains (Fig. 3). For some samples, this may lead to the detection of a single resistant colony only. This emphasizes the need to reduce the number of cross-contaminating conidia from previously cultured samples. Best practice will physically separate the primary culture from any subsequent handling of cultures, especially those with resistance phenotypes.
Standardized protocols for screening of environmental samples do not yet exist. This may be due partially to the heterogeneity of such “environmental samples,” which may encompass dry soil (e.g., see references 39 to 43), air samples (35, 44–46), plant material (43), or simply surface swabs (46). For soil, rigorous vortexing in NaCl (43) and plating of the supernatant following settling of the soil debris have been used. Addition of 0.5% (wt/vol) saponin facilitated the extraction of highly hydrophobic material, i.e., A. fumigatus conidia (39, 40). To restrict the growth of most potential contaminants, incubation at elevated temperatures (>43°C) can be used, as A. fumigatus is highly thermotolerant (47). However, especially environmental samples from tropical areas may still yield strong overgrowth with other thermotolerant species (our own unpublished observation).
Drug concentrations for screening agar plates used in the literature range from 0.5 μg/ml for PSZ (48, 49) to 1 to 4 μg/ml for ITZ or VRZ (39, 43, 48–50). At the lower end of the concentration range, a higher false-positive rate may be observed (39). When working with the goal of isolating A. fumigatus, specifically screening for fluconazole resistance is not necessary, as A. fumigatus is intrinsically resistant to this compound (51–53).
Different mutations leading to singly elevated resistances to particular drugs only are known (Tables 1 and 2). MIC values measured for isolates with altered azole susceptibility are cumulated in Tables 1 and 2. MIC values for tests done according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) protocols were taken from previous references (16, 18, 24, 26, 38, 42, 44, 49, 54–81), and MIC values for tests done according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocols were taken from other previous references (3, 35, 43, 45, 50, 82–107).
TABLE 1.
Levels of drug resistance conferred by mutations in A. fumigatus cyp51A, using EUCAST breakpointsa
Mutation | No. of isolates with MIC (μg/ml) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Itraconazole |
Voriconazole |
Posaconazole |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S |
I | R |
S |
I | R |
S |
I | R |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | >4 | 8 | >8 | 16 | >16 | 32 | >32 | <0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | >2 | 4 | >4 | 8 | >8 | 16 | >16 | <0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | >4 | >8 | >16 | >32 | |
TR34/L98H | 7 | 4 | 18 | 13 | 32 | 13 | 55 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 42 | 62 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 13 | 54 | 53 | 20 | 1 | ||||||||||||
TR34/L98R | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TR34/L98Y | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TR34/L98Q | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TR34/L98I | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TR46/Y121F/T289A | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
TR46/Y121F/T289A/G448S | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TR46×3/Y121F/M172I/T289A/G448S | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F46Y/M172V/N248T/D255E | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G54E | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
G54R | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G54R/M220T | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G54W | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Y121F | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P216L | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F219C | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F219I | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220I | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
M220K | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220L | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220T | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220V | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220R | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Y431C | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G432A | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G434C | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G448S | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Values are cumulative numbers of isolates with the respective MIC values reported in the literature, stratified according to clinical EUCAST breakpoints (133). S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant.
TABLE 2.
Levels of drug resistance conferred by mutations in A. fumigatus cyp51A, using CLSI breakpointsa
Mutation | No. of isolates with MIC (μg/ml) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Itraconazole |
Voriconazole |
Posaconazole |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S |
I | R |
S |
I | R |
S |
I | R |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | >4 | 8 | >8 | 16 | >16 | 32 | >32 | <0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | >2 | 4 | >4 | 8 | >8 | 16 | >16 | <0.125 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | >4 | >8 | >16 | >32 | |
TR34/L98H | 11 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 59 | 5 | 28 | 5 | 24 | 23 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 50 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
TR46/Y121F/T289A | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 7 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
G54E | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
G54R | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
G54V | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G54W | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
G54E/I266N | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G138C | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G138S | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F219I | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F219S | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220I | 1 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220K | 9 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220R | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220T | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M220V | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I266N | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G448S | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Values are cumulative numbers of isolates with the respective MIC values. Clinical breakpoints for results obtained with the CLSI methodology are not available; the values for S/I/R classification used here were adopted from reference 190.
Clinically used antifungal triazole compounds fall into two distinct structural classes (Fig. 1), which largely correlate with cross-resistance phenotypes: in A. fumigatus isolates with mutations in the cyp51A gene, cross-resistances within the substance pairs ITZ/PSZ and VRZ/ISAZ are most strongly correlated (16, 108). ISAZ and its azonium sulfate derivative for oral formulations have become an alternative for the therapy of invasive aspergillosis in patients with VRZ intolerance and seem to be more favorable than VRZ regarding drug-drug interactions (109).
In light of this, the use of at least VRZ along with ITZ as screening drugs is recommended to cover the range of currently known resistance phenotypes. Where available, extension of screening to the clinically relevant substances PSZ and even ISAZ may become advisable in the future.
SPECIES IDENTIFICATION OF ASPERGILLUS
Exact species determination of molds by morphology, including that of Aspergillus spp., is a nontrivial issue (110). Molds can be slow to generate species-specific morphological traits allowing their discrimination, and they often require rather specific conditions to do so (111). On Sabouraud's agar plates, Aspergillus colonies appear as dense fields of conidiophores of various colors. Of the species discussed here, A. flavus appears yellowish to greenish, A. fumigatus and its close sibling species dark blue-green, A. nidulans green to dark yellow, A. niger black, and A. terreus light brownish (112). Due to the absence or delay of conidium formation, A. fumigatus may vary in its visual appearance to nearly white (“albino phenotype”) (16, 111, 113). In addition, exact species boundaries are still not defined in all cases, and classification will ultimately require sequencing of several loci (e.g., internal transcribed spacer [ITS], tub1, benA, and cmd [114, 115]). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometric species identification was recently extended to clinically important molds (116–118). In our own experience, commonly isolated species can readily be differentiated by using the commercial databases, and in cases where isolates with a common look (e.g., the bluish appearance of A. fumigatus) do not give rise to identification via MALDI-TOF, they turn out to be cryptic species not yet included in the scheme (119).
SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING PROCEDURES FOR ASPERGILLUS SPP.
There are several assays for susceptibility testing of Aspergillus, such as broth macrodilution (120), broth microdilution (121–123), and disk diffusion (124, 125) assays, Etest/MIC strip kits (126–128), and other commercial kits (129). Each method has distinct advantages and disadvantages; for example, macro- and microdilution assays are laborious and time-consuming, whereas Etest is easy to perform but expensive when used on a larger scale, and agar diffusion is inexpensive but not able to indicate exact MIC values (120).
Subsequent retesting and quantitative determination of MIC values by use of a reference method are also indicated to determine possible cross-resistance between compounds. In larger studies, two broth microdilution reference methods are mainly used for susceptibility testing: the CLSI M38-A2 protocol (121) and the EUCAST E.DEF 9.1 protocol (123, 130). These two standard methods are highly reproducible, and the MICs can be used for therapeutic selection of antifungal drugs as well as monitoring of antifungal drug susceptibility during treatment (120).
These two methods differ in several critical technical points, such as the amount of fungal inoculum (4 × 104 to 5 × 104 CFU/ml as determined by use of a spectrophotometer for the CLSI method and 2 × 105 to 5 × 105 CFU/ml as determined by use of a hemocytometer for the EUCAST method). In addition, the EUCAST method uses a higher percentage of glucose (2%) in the test medium, which facilitates an increased growth rate and specifies the use of flat-bottomed microtiter plates (120). It should be noted that both protocols have limitations in testing amphotericin B, which shows only a very narrow range of MIC values (0.5 to 2 μg/ml), as well as PSZ and the echinocandins (131). Because of their technical differences, the methods generate different absolute MIC values (131, 132), and consequently, divergent clinical breakpoints have been established by both EUCAST and CLSI (121, 133). EUCAST provides clinical breakpoints for antifungal agents for the interpretation of susceptibility testing results for fungi. Among molds, species-related clinical breakpoints have been determined only for A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. nidulans, A. niger, and A. terreus (133). Using the EUCAST breakpoint table on these species, resistant isolates against the defined antifungal agents can be identified and subsequently investigated for mutations. There are no clinical breakpoints available from the CLSI, and therefore epidemiological cutoff values must be used (121).
In clinical studies, the results of in vitro susceptibility testing of A. fumigatus isolates did not necessarily correlate with the expected outcome of antifungal therapy in infected patients (123). From these studies, the “90-60 rule” was established, which implies that patients with infections caused by an in vitro susceptible strain will respond to the antifungal treatment in approximately 90% of cases, whereas patients suffering from infections caused by resistant isolates will respond in only about 60% of cases (120, 134). Therefore, although broth microdilution susceptibility screening is valuable for the selection of the best therapeutic agent, reliable prediction of the clinical outcome in a patient during antifungal therapy is still cumbersome (120, 130, 131). For these reasons, the combined use of molecular approaches to identify resistance and the phenotypic susceptibility testing described above may improve and guide successful treatment.
EVOLUTION OF cyp51 GENE FAMILIES
The major targets of azole antifungal drugs are cytochrome P450-type enzymes with sterol 14α-demethylase activity. Inhibition of these enzymes leads to the formation of aberrant sterols, which do not complement the function of ergosterol in the plasma membrane and have cytotoxic and eventually fungistatic properties (135). The corresponding genes are called cyp51 in molds and ERG11 in ascomycetous yeast. P450 cytochromes are an evolutionarily ancient protein family and have undergone significant expansion and functional divergence across the entire phylogenetic tree. In molds, this is signified by at least three different lineages of paralogous genes, namely, cyp51A, cyp51B, and cyp51C.
Transcript and therefore protein abundance can be a direct function of gene copy number (“gene amplification” or “gene dosage effect”). If another copy of a cyp51 gene is introduced, this can have a direct effect on drug resistance. For example, heterologous expression of a second pdmA copy in A. nidulans leads to strains that are selectable on azole-containing agar (136). This demonstrates that gene amplification may also contribute to tolerance, possibly as a prerequisite step to the expansion of cyp51 gene families.
However, in evolutionary time spans, such duplicated genes will be fixed in a population only when they diverge in function (137). Paralogous genes may be lost and even may reemerge in populations (138).
Among Aspergillus spp., section Fumigati species contain cyp51A and cyp51B (139). Heterologous expression as well as biochemical testing has revealed differences between A. fumigatus Cyp51A and Cyp51B; despite identical substrate preferences and identical sensitivities against ITZ, VRZ, and PSZ, the isoenzymes showed differential tolerance of fluconazole, which was significantly increased for Cyp51A compared to that of Cyp51B (53, 140, 141). On comparing the Cyp51 protein sequences of molds to those of yeasts, e.g., Erg11 of Candida albicans (51), for which a multitude of substitutions have been brought forward in the context of azole resistance (e.g., see references 142 and 143), it becomes evident that their phylogenetic relationship is far from clear and that direct knowledge transfer to resistance in molds is difficult, at best. The proper paralog to C. albicans ERG11 is probably cyp51B (29). To complicate matters, due to differences in expression patterns (Cyp51B is expressed constitutively, and Cyp51A is inducible), Cyp51A is believed to be the major player in azole resistance in A. fumigatus.
Among section Flavi species, at least for A. flavus and A. calidoustus, the additional paralog cyp51C is present, and in A. calidoustus cyp51A has been lost (144). In these species, Cyp51C appears to be the key player (see below).
RESISTANCE THROUGH TRANSCRIPTIONAL MODULATION OF cyp51 GENES
To date, three different azole resistance-associated variations of the cyp51A promoter (Fig. 4A) are known for A. fumigatus. Most frequently, two tandem repeats, of 34 and 46 bp, have been described to occur 279 bp upstream of the coding region (84, 98, 145). The TR34 promoter has been found only with the L98H exchange conferring high ITZ resistance, and the TR46 promoter has been found in conjunction with the Y121F and T289A exchanges in intermediate to highly VRZ-resistant isolates. Additionally, a 53-bp repeat has been found in isolates that are cross resistant to VRZ and ITZ, without any further Cyp51A alterations (41, 145). Most recently, isolates with up to three or four copies of the TR46 repeat were identified (81). Changes in the promoter region must be interpreted in the context of gene expression levels (Fig. 2D). For the TR34 promoter, a 2-fold higher activity in a reporter assay (146) and an 8-fold higher cyp51A gene expression level (84) have been reported. However, this remains untested so far for any other promoter variants. Molecular studies of the altered A. fumigatus cyp51A promoter have identified opposing actions of the CCAAT binding complex (CBC), which is involved in the regulation of many genes in eukaryotes by binding CCAAT sites (19, 147, 148), and the HAP complex, an element of the sterol response pathway (20). Genome sequencing of matched resistant and susceptible isolates also identified a mutation in hapE, introducing the P88L amino acid exchange, which was shown to be responsible for the azole resistance phenotype (19). Detailed molecular studies of the HAP complex have found it to interact with the cyp51A promoter at the repeat elements found in drug-resistant isolates, there opposing the action of the sterol response factor SrbA (20). The P88L substitution leads to a significant loss of binding activity, in turn leading to unopposed action of the sterol biosynthesis response pathway, upregulating cyp51A, among other sterol biosynthesis genes. As it has been reported only once, the number of clinical isolates containing the P88L substitution in HapE appears not to be very high, or at least underinvestigated.
FIG 4.
Mutations in A. fumigatus cyp51A and its promoter region. (A) Alignment of the TR34 (taken from isolate 168 [16]), TR46 (taken from an environmental isolate [39]), and TR53 (sequence taken from a Columbian isolate [41; P. LePape, personal communication]) promoter alleles with the wild-type sequences from A. fumigatus (A. fu), A. fischeri (A. fish), and A. oerlinghausenensis (A. oerl) (119). Green, TR34 repeat unit; blue or red, 5′ or 3′ region and respective repeat sequences probably stemming from there. Black uppercase residues indicate sequence divergence in the repeat region, lowercase residues indicate adjacent residues, and black boxes indicate TR34, TR46, and TR53 repeats. (B) In sequencing data, these three different types of A. fumigatus can easily be differentiated by the 5′ upstream sequence preceding the static repeat unit: sequences different from the wild-type sequenc are indicated by underscored nucleotides. (C) Known amino acid substitutions in Cyp51A. Red, known resistance-conferring substitutions; black, substitutions present in the population, probably without an effect on drug susceptibility. (D) cyp51A gene features visualized by use of sequence analysis software (Geneious R10). The data are available as a .gb annotated file or as a Word document in a community-editable form from https://github.com/oliverbader/Aspergillus_fumigatus_cyp51A.
Outside A. fumigatus, data on cyp51 promoter alterations are scarce. Only in Aspergillus (Neosartoriya) fischeri and Aspergillus oerlinghausense, the two known species most closely related to A. fumigatus, can a similar to identical 34-bp core repeat region readily be identified in the respective promoters of the corresponding cyp51A genes (Fig. 4A). In A. oerlinghausense, a short insertion upstream of the core repeat correlates with the decreased azole susceptibility in the only two existing isolates of this new species (119), albeit molecular confirmation for this observation is currently lacking. The 1-kb regions flanking the three cyp51 paralogs of resistant and susceptible A. flavus isolates investigated (149) did not deviate from each other, but further upstream a short 4-bp deletion was found in two resistant strains (149). The role of this deletion remains unclear. In sequencing data for A. fumigatus cyp51A, the type of repeat can easily be identified by the first 10 bp preceding the static 34-bp repeat unit (Fig. 4B).
RESISTANCE-CONFERRING ALTERATIONS WITHIN Cyp51 PROTEINS
Mair et al. (29) recently suggested the use of a positional nomenclature for fungal resistance mutations to allow easier transfer of knowledge on orthologous proteins of different species. Based on a preformed alignment of the amino acid sequences, the respective number in a reference is given instead of the residue number of the affected amino acid itself. For Cyp51A-orthologous proteins, the reference was suggested to be Cyp51A of A. fumigatus, and for Cyp51B-orthologous proteins, the reference is Cyp51B of Zymoseptoria tritici (anamorph of Mycosphaerella graminicola). For Cyp51C, no suggestion has yet been made; for the purpose of this review, we therefore name Cyp51C of A. flavus as the reference. The positional nomenclature is used below and summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Cyp51 substitutions in non-A. fumigatus organisms and their correspondence to the reference positions used in the text
Organism | Reference positiona |
Reference | Observed substitution |
Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene | Positionb | Gene | Substitution | |||
A. flavus | Afcyp51A | Y68 | 29 | cyp51A | Y132N | 160 |
Afcyp51A | K133 | 29 | cyp51A | K197N | 160 | |
Afcyp51A | NA | cyp51A | A205T | 149 | ||
Afcyp51A | D280 | 29 | cyp51A | D282E | 160 | |
Afcyp51A | M286 | 29 | cyp51A | M288L | 160 | |
Afcyp51A | T470 | 29 | cyp51A | T469S | 160 | |
Ztcyp51B | H430 | 29 | cyp51B | H399P | 160 | |
Ztcyp51B | A453 | 29 | cyp51B | D411N | 160 | |
Ztcyp51B | T496 | 29 | cyp51B | T454P | 160 | |
Ztcyp51B | NA | cyp51B | T486P | 160 | ||
Afcyp51C | M54 | Proposed here | cyp51C | M54T | 149 | |
Afcyp51C | S196 | Proposed here | cyp51C | S196F | 161 | |
Afcyp51C | S240 | Proposed here | cyp51C | S240A | 149, 162 | |
Afcyp51C | D254 | Proposed here | cyp51C | D254N | 149 | |
Afcyp51C | I285 | Proposed here | cyp51C | I285V | 149 | |
Afcyp51C | Y319 | Proposed here | cyp51C | Y319H | 149, 191 | |
Afcyp51C | A324 | Proposed here | cyp51C | A324P | 161 | |
Afcyp51C | N423 | Proposed here | cyp51C | N423D | 161 | |
Afcyp51C | V465 | Proposed here | cyp51C | V465 M | 161 | |
A. terreus | Afcyp51A | M220 | 29 | cyp51A | M217I | 165 |
A. niger | Afcyp51A | K230 | 29 | cyp51A | R228Q | 166 |
A. tubingensis | Afcyp51A | L21 | 29 | cyp51A | L21F | 166 |
Accession numbers for reference sequences are as follows: A. fumigatus cyp51A, AF338659; Zymoseptoria tritici (anamorph of Mycosphaerella graminicola) cyp51B, AY253234; and cyp51C, AKQ20794.1.
NA, not applicable (the respective residue was not found at this position in publicly deposited A. flavus sequences).
Aspergillus fumigatus
In approximately 50 to 80% of the clinically observed ARAf isolates, resistance is attributable to amino acid exchanges within the Cyp51A protein (16–18, 95). Cyp51B substitutions seen in the population apparently do not contribute to resistance. Similarly, only a subset of Cyp51A substitutions present in the population lead to resistance against azoles (Fig. 4C). Notably, several synonymous (silent) mutations in cyp51A are also known, e.g., at the L358 or C454 codon (82) or the L77, R65, or E356 codon (150). These are interesting in a phylogenetic context but have no relevance for deduction of resistance phenotypes. On encountering nonsynonymous mutations in sequencing data, these must be discriminated from allelic variants without any effects on azole susceptibility. Several substitutions (e.g., F46Y, H147Y, M172V, N248T, N248K, D255E, D343N, E427K, and G434C) seem not to be involved in azole resistance, as they are also found in different combinations in azole-susceptible isolates (56, 62, 70, 75, 82, 87, 151), and these sites are mostly localized at the protein surface (152). Among these, isolates harboring the multiply substituted cyp51A F46Y/G89G/M172V/L358L/E427K/C454C allele (18, 56) appear to form a separate phylogenetic subgroup rather than grouping with strains with acquired resistance. Nevertheless, these substitutions do occur alongside those with relevance for reduced antifungal drug susceptibility, e.g., the TR34/L98H substitution (Fig. 4 and Table 2), likely where the original resistant strain crossed with another isolate of the population (153, 154).
The Cyp51A-I266N substitution reported from Japan (90) can probably be discarded as an interpretation error, as the reference sequence already has an asparagine (N) residue at this codon and it was not observed in subsequent studies (155).
Azole-based inhibitors of Cyp51 interact with the protein by complexing the heme group located in the catalytic center (152). For amino acid substitutions located along the periphery of the protein (e.g., S52T, Q88H, N125I, Q141H, S297T, or F495H), homology modeling suggests that they do not relevantly change its functionality (82, 152). Consequently, residues where substitutions lead to azole resistance, e.g., G54 (57, 83, 90, 103), G138 (56, 75, 104), or M220 (56, 82, 99), are mainly located close to the opening of one of the two ligand access channels of the protein, blocking the docking of most azole molecules (82, 152). Similarly, the L98 residue is located on a highly conserved, loop-forming, arch-like structure affecting the entry to the ligand access channel (82).
For several of the polymorphisms seen in antifungal drug-resistant isolates, the resistance-conferring nature of the particular substitution has been confirmed on a molecular level: biochemical testing of purified recombinant A. fumigatus Cyp51A-M220K and Cyp51A-G54W expressed in Escherichia coli (141) showed inhibition kinetics that would be expected from the respective clinical isolates' phenotypes, namely, a strong reduction in inhibition by ITZ and PSZ but not by VRZ. Interestingly, the G54W mutation does occur in both isolates with increased and those with susceptible MIC values (Tables 1 and 2). This raises the question of whether this substitution is actually relevant to clinical resistance, despite the fact that its contribution to reduced susceptibility has been confirmed in vitro (141). This may also be an example of interactions with other factors, such as protein-protein interactions potentially dependent on the genetic strain background.
A very different situation was found for Cyp51A-L98H. In this case, inhibition of resistance was only marginally impaired, but the enzyme retained some residual activity at higher triazole concentrations, thus likely explaining its in vivo resistance phenotype (141). Structural modeling suggests that the L98H substitution is located at neither the substrate binding cleft nor the central heme group, but rather in a conserved surface arch, which would support these data (152).
The gold standard for in vivo testing of this is heterologous expression of a potential resistance-conferring allele in a susceptible host. In the case of cyp51A mutations from A. fumigatus, susceptible strains of the fungal model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae and, more recently, A. fumigatus itself have been used.
S. cerevisiae is readily available for genetic studies and has also served as a host in several studies of azole resistance in several plant-pathogenic fungi (11). S. cerevisiae encodes only one Cyp51 ortholog, namely, Erg11. However, deletion of ERG11 results in lethality, which is why complementation experiments were done in an ERG11 tetracycline-repressible strain (140) or by a one-step gene replacement strategy (75). In these studies, introduction of the cyp51A or cyp5B gene was shown to complement the loss of the respective S. cerevisiae enzyme function.
Using a tetracycline-regulatable system, Alcazar-Fuoli et al. (156) were able to confirm the anticipated phenotypes for several mutations at positions G54 and M220: elevated ITZ MICs were found for G54E, G54V, G54W, and M220K mutants, and the M220K and M220I substitutions conferred VRZ resistance. The highest MIC values for PSZ were found for the G54W mutant, followed by the G54V, G54E, and M220K mutants. Using the gene replacement strategy, Albarrag et al. (75) confirmed decreased azole susceptibility for Cyp51A-G138C and Cyp51A-Y431C. Unexpectedly, the G434C mutant showed no resistance phenotype. The authors suggested that this method may not be suitable for alterations at the far C-terminal end of the protein, where interactions with as yet unknown binding partners may be the reason for reduced susceptibility in the original host.
Although a high degree of cross- and pan-azole resistance is seen, the quantitative degree of reduced drug sensitivity still varies between individual substitutions as well as compounds (Table 2). These effects may also be cumulative in cases where different promoter modifications and/or amino acid substitutions are combined in a single isolate. For A. fumigatus, these effects have been best investigated for the TR46/Y121F/T289A allele. Isolates with this allele show high VRZ MICs along with reduced ITZ and PSZ susceptibilities (45). A single isolate with only the Y121F substitution showed only an intermediate VRZ MIC (157). Based on this, molecular dissection of this allele in an A. fumigatus expression system showed that the combination of TR46 with the Y121F mutation was sufficient to induce both high ITZ and VRZ resistances, while TR46 or the T289A mutation alone or in combination did not have a similar effect. Most strikingly, the strain arising from combination of the T289A mutation with the TR46/Y212F allele was again less resistant to ITZ (158). Others have also found the TR46/Y121F/T289A allele in combination with the G448S substitution in an isolate with pan-azole resistance (67). However, the G448S amino acid change can result in cross-resistance to VRZ and ITZ (159). The MIC values reported for the individual mutations are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, stratified by testing method.
Aspergillus flavus
Next to A. fumigatus, most other amino acid substitutions in Cyp51 proteins have been described for Aspergillus flavus. A key difference of this species from other Aspergillus species is the existence of a third paralog in A. flavus, namely, cyp51C. Substitutions have been observed in all three paralogs. Using the positional nomenclature (Table 3), these were at Y68, K133, D280, M286, and T470 in Cyp51A (149, 160), H430, D435, and T496 in Cyp51B (160), and M54, S196, S240, D254, Y319, A324, N423, and V465 in Cyp51C (149, 161, 162).
As in A. fumigatus Cyp51A, the relevance of the Cyp51 substitutions seen in A. flavus must also be interpreted with respect to the variability of the respective positions in the population as well as in other fungal species.
Both the M54T and S240A substitutions in Cyp51C are present in susceptible isolates and were identified as variants in the respective studies (149, 161) only because the genome-sequenced strain MYA-384/AF70 (accession number PRJNA217045) contains a cyp51C isoform divergent from that of the general A. flavus population, including the reference genome (A. flavus NRRL3357 [accession number PRJNA13284]) (163). The latter also applies to the S196P, D254N, and N423D substitutions (Fig. 5). Only in the case of the M54T substitution is a known resistance substitution of Cyp51A (G54) located in the close vicinity; however, Cyp51A G54 actually corresponds to the adjacent Cyp51C position G53, not M54 (Fig. 5). At all positions except S196, variation is seen between other species. The S240A substitution (note that due to the intron in A. flavus cyp51C, the respective mutation is referred to as a T788G substitution; nucleotide positions of the mutations are listed in the work of Paul et al. [149]) remains particularly controversial. In one study, it was associated with a high VRZ MIC, and this phenotype was confirmed using molecular complementation assays (162). However, others have also observed it in susceptible isolates (149). Together, these observations make involvement of these residues in drug resistance unlikely (149).
FIG 5.
Amino acid substitutions in Cyp51C proteins. Numbers and asterisks show the reference positions of residues discussed in the text (blue). Vertical dashes, sequence identity between A. flavus NRRL3357 Cyp51C (accession number XP_002383931) and A. fumigatus Cyp51A (accession number AF338659); dots, residues identical to those in A. flavus NRRL3357 Cyp51C. Accession numbers for the other reference sequences are as follows: A. flavus ATCC MYA-384/AF70, KOC15064; A. oryzae RIB40, AB514682; A. nomius, XP_015411243; A. lentulus, AEB77687; Trichophyton interdigitale, EZF31978; Trichophyton tonsurans, EGD95049; Trichophyton rubrum, XP_003235929; Trichophyton soudanense, EZF72647; Microsporum canis, XP_002845046; Histoplasma capsulatum, EER42982; and Blastomyces dermatitidis, EGE84227.
Of the four remaining residues (I285, Y319, A232, and V465), only I285 shows variation within the Aspergillus genus (161), but the reported I285V substitution cooccurred only in isolates with other potential resistance-conferring substitutions (149).
For cyp51A and cyp51B, microevolution experiments using long-term incubation of A. flavus on azole-containing media have yielded strains with reduced azole susceptibility and mutations leading to multiple amino acid exchanges in both Cyp51A and Cyp51B (160). This was most prominent for Cyp51A-K197N (position K133), which was observed three times independently. Other substitutions (Table 3) were observed only once, and several less susceptible isolates with unaltered cyp51A and cyp51B sequences were also observed. Potential changes in cyp51C or other genes were not investigated, limiting these observations; similarly, the K133 position is not known outside these experiments to hold resistance substitutions and has not been verified independently.
How any of these substitutions affect antifungal therapy in a clinical setting remains unclear. In a nonimmunocompromised mouse model, VRZ treatment was not relevantly impaired by mutations in cyp51C (164). The authors of that study discussed the position of the Y319H mutation as being rather far from the binding position of azoles and a potential loss of fitness in resistant strains as explanations for the unexpected results.
Other Aspergillus Species
Data on azole resistance and the underlying mutations in species apart from A. fumigatus and A. flavus are scarce; however, there are 3 single observations of Cyp51A alterations reported in the literature (Table 3): the M217I substitution (position M220) in A. terreus (165), the R228Q substitution (position K230) in A. niger (166), and the L21F substitution (position L21) in A. tubingensis (166). The isolate with the R228Q substitution showed a PSZ MIC above the epidemiological cutoff value. For the A. tubingensis isolate with the L21F substitution, especially the measured ITZ MIC value of 64 μg/ml was highly elevated compared to those for other isolates (166). Only the M217I substitution corresponds to a well-known residue (M220) involved in azole resistance in A. fumigatus. Neither K230 nor L21 has been implicated in Cyp51A-based drug resistance, and neither observed exchange has yet been validated independently.
MOLECULAR METHODS FOR DETECTION OF ALTERATIONS AT cyp51 LOCI
Aspergillus fumigatus
A standard method to detect alterations of the cyp51A gene in fungal isolates is not yet defined. The most commonly used method is simple PCR amplification of the entire coding and promoter region, followed by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products. Identification of the promoter repeat type can easily be achieved by analyzing the 5′ upstream sequence of the static repeat unit (Fig. 4B). Specific methods for detection of the TR34 and TR46 variants are also available, including several rapid TaqMan-based approaches and melting curve analyses on LightCycler instruments (Table 4). Utilization of an AluI-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method (167) at the L98 codon probably has the highest value for most laboratories, as the assay is readily performed without the need for specialized equipment. It allows easy simultaneous detection of both TR34 and TR46 repeats (and likely also others), as well as the L98H substitution (Fig. 6), therefore encompassing the most frequently encountered resistance-associated cyp51A alleles. The commercially available AsperGenius assay also covers these two alleles (Table 4). For a few selected other exchanges at polymorphic sites, namely, G54 and M220, specialized PCR-based detection methods have been developed (Table 4).
TABLE 4.
PCR-based assays to characterize molecular resistance azole mechanisms in Aspergillus spp.
PCR use and format | Target | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Analyses of A. fumigatus cyp51A | ||
Real-time PCR | Single regions (∼100 bp) | 192, 193 |
Mixed-format real-time PCR | TR- and amino acid substitution-specific regions | 92, 194 |
PCR-RFLP | Multiple single regions (180–270 bp) | 167 |
Nested PCR, two amplicons | F1, TR region to L98; F2, G54 to N266 | 193 |
Conventional one-step and nested PCRa | Single regions (100–173 bp) for TR34/L98H and M220 | 175 |
Single regions (103–143 bp) for TR46 and the L98H substitution | 174 | |
PCR with TaqMan probes | TR, G54, L98, G138, M220 | 83 |
L98H and Y121F substitutions | 71 | |
Primer extension | TR34 and 15 polymorphic sites | 151 |
LightCycler endpoint genotyping | L98H, Y121F substitutions | 71 |
AsperGenius (PathoNostics BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands) multiplex real-time PCR and melting curve analysisa | TR34, L98H, Y121F, T289A substitutions | 25, 107, 176, 177 |
Real-time RT-PCR | cyp51A gene expression | 75 |
Analyses of A. fumigatus genes other than cyp51A | ||
PCR plus sequencing | Full cyp51B gene in four amplicons | 75 |
Real-time RT-PCR | cyp51B gene expression | 75 |
mdr1 and mdr4 gene expression | 75 | |
PCR with TaqMan probes | cyp51B S35, P294 | 151 |
PCR plus sequencing | Full hapE gene | 19 |
PCR plus sequencing, real-time RT-PCR | cyp51A, mdr1-4, atrF, cdr1B (abcG1), mfs56 | 17 |
Analyses of A. flavus cyp51 genes | ||
PCR plus sequencing | cyp51A and -B genes plus 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences | 160 |
PCR plus sequencing, TaqMan probes | cyp51A, -B, and -C genes plus 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences | 162 |
PCR plus sequencing | cyp51A, -B, and -C genes plus 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences | 149 |
Non-culture-based, direct investigation of clinical (respiratory) samples was possible after confirmation of Aspergillus DNA in the sample by use of diagnostic Aspergillus PCR assays.
FIG 6.
Interpretation of AluI-digested A. fumigatus cyp51A PCR product surrounding the L98 position. (A) In isolates carrying the L98H substitution, the AluI restriction site at this codon is abolished (167). (B) A PCR product amplified with the P5-P7 primer pair (16) encompasses both the L98 site and the promoter repeat region. When digested with AluI, the wild-type product is cleaved into four fragments, and the length of fragment A is characteristic of the length of the TR region. In L98H isolates, fragments B and C are not cleaved apart, resulting in a visible size shift. (C) When resolved in a high-percentage (e.g., 2.5%) agarose gel, the size shift is visualized as specific RFLP patterns for TR34/L98H- and TR46-carrying isolates. Other substitutions cannot be found using this method, as their RFLP patterns correspond to the wild-type patterns. The method may, however, be suitable to detect other promoter variants.
For all other mutations, including so far unknown ones, PCR amplification of the gene in either a single (3, 18, 45, 50, 68, 82, 104, 168) or multiple (16, 44, 54, 56, 60, 62, 63, 75, 84, 100, 157, 169–171) amplicons plus subsequent sequencing is necessary. Identification of mutations in trace files or derived fasta sequences and of the respective amino acid substitutions is most easily achieved by mapping against a reference sequence. To facilitate this, we created an annotated reference containing currently known polymorphic sites along with other relevant features (Fig. 4D) (https://github.com/oliverbader/Aspergillus_fumigatus_cyp51A). Alternatively, there is also an online tool available to perform sequence analysis on A. fumigatus cyp51A (172).
Given the low pathogen yields by cultural methods for patients with hematological malignancies who are at high risk for invasive aspergillosis, it is very likely that azole resistance is still underdiagnosed in this population (173). The reported high mortality rates associated with ARAf underline the necessity of using non-culture-based assays for the detection of both Aspergillus spp. and azole resistance directly from clinical samples (24, 25, 174, 175). This approach requires higher sensitivity and lower detection thresholds than those for working on cultured isolates. Molecular methods for detecting cyp51A alterations directly from clinical samples have to combine high sensitivity and specificity to ensure the amplification of small amounts of Aspergillus DNA and to avoid cross-reactivity with human DNA. Most formats are PCR-based methods with subsequent DNA sequence analysis for the detection of mutations. PCR assays investigating primary clinical samples directly do not have the ability to amplify the whole cyp51A gene due to the very small amount of intact fungal high-molecular-weight DNA in these samples. Therefore, individual PCR assays were established to amplify the key mutation-carrying gene sections. In this scenario, nested PCR assays using two consecutive PCRs amplifying the same gene region have shown the highest sensitivities. A new real-time PCR-based system for detection of Aspergillus DNA and the TR34/L98H and Y121F/T289A cyp51A alterations without subsequent DNA sequencing is the AsperGenius system from PathoNostics (25, 107, 176, 177). This test system is based on Aspergillus DNA amplification by multiplex real-time PCR followed by melting curve analysis to detect the mutations in different PCR cycler-based detection channels. Protocols that have been used successfully directly on clinical samples (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid and blood samples) with low pathogen DNA amounts, e.g., nested PCR (174) or multiplex PCR (25, 58, 176, 177), are summarized in Table 4. In this rapidly advancing field, prospective studies are still ongoing.
Other Aspergillus Species
For Aspergillus spp. other than A. fumigatus, there are currently no commonly used protocols and—to date—no commercially available kits. The best-characterized species is Aspergillus flavus. Molecular analysis of the cyp51A and cyp51B genes for resistance mutations was performed using PCR with subsequent DNA sequence analysis (160). In another study, amplification of cyp51A, -B, and -C included an additional 1 kb of genomic DNA up- and downstream of the coding regions (162). Assays for the analysis of cyp51 expression levels by quantitative TaqMan-based real-time PCR have also been described (162). The aspects of molecular azole resistance detection in A. flavus are also summarized in Table 4.
OTHER RESISTANCE MECHANISMS
For a significant proportion of azole-resistant clinical A. fumigatus isolates, no mutations within the cyp51A locus are observed (16–18, 95). Compilation of the MIC values from the literature (Tables 1 and 2) showed that isolates with the VRZ resistance-conferring TR46/Y121F/T289A allele fall into two clearly distinct groups with respect to ITZ cross-resistance, namely, VRZr ITZs/i and VRZr ITZr, in the absence of other cyp51A mutations. We also previously observed an unusual TR34/L98H isolate with an additional VRZ MIC of >32 μg/ml (39). Together, these data highlight the multifactorial ability of the fungus to overcome susceptibility, so the genetic basis for resistance is not restricted just to mutations within the cyp51A region. However, so far, only a few other mechanisms have been discussed to contribute to clinical azole resistance.
Most importantly, the expression of ABC transporters can be upregulated in clinical isolates (Fig. 2E); however, their contribution to azole resistance has not yet been fully clarified (17, 23). So far, the best-studied transporter in correlation with drug resistance is the ABC efflux transporter Cdr1B. This transporter shows high homology to the efflux pump Cdr1p from Candida albicans (CaCdr1), which is regulated by the transcription factor Tac1. Overexpression of CaCdr1 increases the resistance to fluconazole in both A. fumigatus (17, 21) and C. albicans (178). A potential regulator of Cdr1B in A. fumigatus that is similar to Tac1 in C. albicans is the zinc cluster transcription factor AtrR (179). Mutations in this regulator might provide explanations for increased resistance mediated by overexpression of Cdr1B. Nevertheless, gain-of-function mutations of either the atrR or cdr1B coding region or their promoters have not been described so far.
Data from in vitro approaches, such as mutagenesis, genetic backcrosses, and complementation in S. cerevisiae, have led to the identification of other potential drug resistance genes (19, 22, 180–182), but these have not yet been confirmed to exist in clinical or environmental isolates.
Especially when interpreting PCR and/or sequencing data in the absence of a culture isolate for susceptibility testing, it must be kept in mind that the presence of a particular mutation likely indicates resistance toward specific compounds (high positive predictive value); however, the absence of a mutation per se does not indicate susceptibility (low negative predictive value).
Standardized phenotypic tests that can be used for diagnostic procedures for detection of increased sterol biosynthesis or efflux have not yet been proposed.
CONTRIBUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES TO RESISTANCE DETECTION
Using genetic strain typing of a small A. fumigatus strain set, it has been suggested that the TR34/L98H allele arose only once and has since been propagating through the A. fumigatus population (35). For isolates with the TR46/Y121F/T289A or G54E/W allele, similar observations have been made (39, 108). This has led to only a few distinct lineages, which can be differentiated by both short-tandem-repeat typing (e.g., see references 24 and 108) and csp1 typing (e.g., see references 39 and 170). Because of this and a significant degree of cross-resistance to agricultural fungicides, the hypothesis of an environmental origin of these alleles has been suggested (50). Strains with these alleles are thought to be propagated in the environment through the use of different azole compounds by the farming industry. Along with that proposition, an exogenous route of infection of patients has been proposed for these isolates. In contrast, isolates with other exchanges at G54 or at M220 or with one of the rarer mutations are more likely to have originated within the patient under prolonged antifungal therapy with mold-active azoles.
Short-tandem-repeat typing of A. fumigatus (STRAf typing) utilizes the copy number variability of nine short repeat sequences, of 2 to 4 bp in length, whose PCR amplicons are resolved by capillary electrophoresis (183). STRAf typing has a very high discriminatory power (183), and for ARAf isolates, it has been shown to readily demonstrate the genetic nearness of globally isolated TR34/L98H or G54E strains (108). This makes it an excellent and robust reference method; however, capillary electrophoresis requires special equipment, which rules out its use as a rapidly established laboratory technique. Thus, the typing approach using the repetitive region of the csp1 gene is implemented more easily (184–186). The csp1 gene is simply amplified by PCR and sequenced, and the sequence is searched for the number and type of 12-bp-long elements. Their order gives one of (currently) 27 csp1 types (184). As a single-locus method, it has a lower discriminatory power than that of STRAf typing, but it is more easily implemented and is practical even for a single isolate. Among the isolates tested in our own laboratory, there was a moderate correlation of TR34/L98H isolates with the t04B csp1 type, a type which has not been described for isolates with any other cyp51A allele (39).
Additionally, sequencing of hypervariable regions in cell wall genes (“TRESP”) (187) has been shown to yield a sufficiently diverse marker set to discriminate within the A. fumigatus population. By this analysis, TR34/L98H strains also formed a less diverse (i.e., more closely related) subpopulation.
Ultimately, whole-genome sequencing will have to reveal the phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships among early TR34/L98H A. fumigatus isolates and their progeny. A first study (154) did indeed find similar rates of recombination between strains isolated more distantly as well as in close proximity. Similar conclusions of both local clonal expansion and global recombination were drawn from a study using STRAf typing (188).
From a clinical point of view, phylogenetic analyses are therefore interesting for identifying local outbreaks or common sources of infection, but they unfortunately have—despite a likely common ancestral origin for strains with the major resistance alleles—only low value for the prediction of azole resistance phenotypes in A. fumigatus.
CONCLUSIONS
The emergence of Aspergillus strains with azole resistance, and even pan-azole resistance, spreading through the environment rather than originating under therapy in individual patients poses a significant threat to vulnerable patient groups. Although this has not yet been shown for other alleles, most worrying is that at least Cyp51A-G54W- or Cyp51A-M220K-carrying azole-resistant A. fumigatus strains do not seem to suffer from growth or fitness defects (189): as in phytopathogens, azole resistance in human-pathogenic Aspergillus spp. is likely here to stay. Recombination with other alleles has already been observed within A. fumigatus cyp51A alleles, as both TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A alleles have been observed in combination with substitutions seen in the population (39, 81, 154). Since A. fumigatus does have a sexual cycle and genetically crosses in the wild (153, 154), it stands to reason that despite the initial clonal expansion, phylogenetic relationships between the different loci and resistance alleles will blur and eventually dissipate in the future. Within a species, the resistance traits may freely combine with each other as well as with other traits present in the wild, leading to increasingly resistant populations. Establishing the local epidemiology, for which we outlined potential workflows here, and setup of proper patient testing procedures are therefore indicated in clinical settings.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a research grant from Pfizer Germany to O.B. (grant WI186302) and by a research grant of Burapha University, through the National Research Council of Thailand, to M.T. (grant 165/2559).
We thank Agnieszka Goretzki (University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany) for conducting the RFLP analysis in Fig. 6. We thank Patrice Le Pape (Université de Nantes, Nantes, France) for providing the unpublished sequence of the 53-bp promoter repeat unit for Fig. 4. The anonymous reviewers are thanked for pointing out several gaps in the initial manuscript.
All authors contributed to writing and approved the final version of the manuscript.
D.B. serves in the speakers' bureaus of Astellas, Basiela, Gilead Sciences, Merck/MSD, and Pfizer, received research grants from Gilead Sciences and Pfizer and travel grants from Astellas, Merck/MSD, and Pfizer, and is a consultant to Basiela, Gilead Sciences, and MSD. U.G. received grants from Gilead Sciences and travel grants and speakers' fees from Pfizer and Gilead. O.B. received research grants from Pfizer and Gilead Sciences.
Biographies
Anna Dudakova is a medical microbiologist with a focus on antimicrobial stewardship, including antifungal treatment. Infections with Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. are her main interest. She works at the Institute for Medical Microbiology at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
Birgit Spiess is a molecular biologist with a research focus on molecular diagnostics of invasive fungal diseases and azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, especially in patients with hematological malignancies. She works as a Senior Scientist in the Scientific Laboratory of the Department of Hematology and Oncology at the Mannheim University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Germany.
Marut Tangwattanachuleeporn is a microbiologist currently holding an Assistant Professorship for Microbiology at Burapha University, Chon Buri, Thailand. His studies focus on the prevalence of pathogenic fungi in the environment, such as Aspergillus spp., dermatophytes, and Cryptococcus spp., as potential sources of infection, as well as monitoring of their antimycotic drug resistance.
Christoph Sasse is a molecular microbiologist with a research focus on the stress and drug responses of the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. He was trained in Göttingen, Germany, at Georg August University and currently holds a postdoctoral position in the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics of Georg August University.
Dieter Buchheidt is a hematologist and infectious diseases specialist with a focus on biomarker-based diagnosis of Aspergillus infections in patients with hematological malignancies. He is a Senior Physician at the Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael Weig is a medical microbiologist with a research focus on the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human fungal infections. He is a Senior Physician at the Institute for Medical Microbiology at the University Medical Center Göttingen.
Uwe Groß is a medical microbiologist who is focusing his research activities on the epidemiology and diagnosis of infectious diseases. He is Head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology at the University Medical Center Göttingen.
Oliver Bader is a molecular biologist with a research focus on pathogenic fungi. Initially trained in molecular mycology at the Robert Koch Institute, he is currently a group leader at the Institute for Medical Microbiology, working on the development and refinement of diagnostic strategies, including susceptibility testing, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and serologic detection of bacterial and fungal infections.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kousha M, Tadi R, Soubani AO. 2011. Pulmonary aspergillosis: a clinical review. Eur Respir Rev 20:156–174. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00001011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van de Peppel RJ, von dem Borne PA, le Cessie S, de Boer MGJ. 2017. A new time-dependent approach for assessment of the impact of invasive aspergillosis shows effect on short- but not on long-term survival of patients with AML or high-risk MDS. Bone Marrow Transplant 52:883–888. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Snelders E, van der Lee HA, Kuijpers J, Rijs AJ, Varga J, Samson RA, Mellado E, Donders AR, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2008. Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLoS Med 5:e219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Verweij PE, Chowdhary A, Melchers WJ, Meis JF. 2016. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: can we retain the clinical use of mold-active antifungal azoles? Clin Infect Dis 62:362–368. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wiederhold NP, Patterson TF. 2015. Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 36:673–680. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Luo CX, Schnabel G. 2008. The cytochrome P450 lanosterol 14alpha-demethylase gene is a demethylation inhibitor fungicide resistance determinant in Monilinia fructicola field isolates from Georgia. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:359–366. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02159-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma Z, Proffer TJ, Jacobs JL, Sundin GW. 2006. Overexpression of the 14alpha-demethylase target gene (cyp51) mediates fungicide resistance in Blumeriella jaapii. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2581–2585. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2581-2585.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Parker JE, Warrilow AG, Price CL, Mullins JG, Kelly DE, Kelly SL. 2014. Resistance to antifungals that target CYP51. J Chem Biol 7:143–161. doi: 10.1007/s12154-014-0121-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Price CL, Parker JE, Warrilow AG, Kelly DE, Kelly SL. 2015. Azole fungicides—understanding resistance mechanisms in agricultural fungal pathogens. Pest Manag Sci 71:1054–1058. doi: 10.1002/ps.4029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.FRAC. 2017. Mechanisms of fungicide resistance. http://www.frac.info/resistance-overview/mechanisms-of-fungicide-resistance.
- 11.Becher R, Wirsel SG. 2012. Fungal cytochrome P450 sterol 14alpha-demethylase (CYP51) and azole resistance in plant and human pathogens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:825–840. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4195-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cools HJ, Fraaije BA. 2013. Update on mechanisms of azole resistance in Mycosphaerella graminicola and implications for future control. Pest Manag Sci 69:150–155. doi: 10.1002/ps.3348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Verweij PE, Ananda-Rajah M, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Bruggemann RJ, Chowdhary A, Cornely OA, Denning DW, Groll AH, Izumikawa K, Kullberg BJ, Lagrou K, Maertens J, Meis JF, Newton P, Page I, Seyedmousavi S, Sheppard DC, Viscoli C, Warris A, Donnelly JP. 2015. International expert opinion on the management of infection caused by azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus. Drug Resist Updat 21–22:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Verweij PE, Lestrade PP, Melchers WJ, Meis JF. 2016. Azole resistance surveillance in Aspergillus fumigatus: beneficial or biased? J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2079–2082. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Patterson TF, Thompson GR III, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young JA, Bennett JE. 2016. Executive summary: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:433–442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bader O, Weig M, Reichard U, Lugert R, Kuhns M, Christner M, Held J, Peter S, Schumacher U, Buchheidt D, Tintelnot K, Gross U, MykoLabNet-D Partners. 2013. cyp51A-based mechanisms of Aspergillus fumigatus azole drug resistance present in clinical samples from Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3513–3517. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00167-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fraczek MG, Bromley M, Buied A, Moore CB, Rajendran R, Rautemaa R, Ramage G, Denning DW, Bowyer P. 2013. The cdr1B efflux transporter is associated with non-cyp51a-mediated itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1486–1496. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bueid A, Howard SJ, Moore CB, Richardson MD, Harrison E, Bowyer P, Denning DW. 2010. Azole antifungal resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: 2008 and 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2116–2118. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Camps SM, Dutilh BE, Arendrup MC, Rijs AJ, Snelders E, Huynen MA, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2012. Discovery of a HapE mutation that causes azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus through whole genome sequencing and sexual crossing. PLoS One 7:e50034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gsaller F, Hortschansky P, Furukawa T, Carr PD, Rash B, Capilla J, Muller C, Bracher F, Bowyer P, Haas H, Brakhage AA, Bromley MJ. 2016. Sterol biosynthesis and azole tolerance is governed by the opposing actions of SrbA and the CCAAT binding complex. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005775. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paul S, Diekema D, Moye-Rowley WS. 2013. Contributions of Aspergillus fumigatus ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins to drug resistance and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 12:1619–1628. doi: 10.1128/EC.00171-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meneau I, Coste AT, Sanglard D. 2016. Identification of Aspergillus fumigatus multidrug transporter genes and their potential involvement in antifungal resistance. Med Mycol 54:616–627. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moye-Rowley WS. 2015. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the development of clinically significant azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front Microbiol 6:70. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Steinmann J, Hamprecht A, Vehreschild MJ, Cornely OA, Buchheidt D, Spiess B, Koldehoff M, Buer J, Meis JF, Rath PM. 2015. Emergence of azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis in HSCT recipients in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1522–1526. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chong GM, van der Beek MT, von dem Borne PA, Boelens J, Steel E, Kampinga GA, Span LF, Lagrou K, Maertens JA, Dingemans GJ, Gaajetaan GR, van Tegelen DW, Cornelissen JJ, Vonk AG, Rijnders BJ. 2016. PCR-based detection of Aspergillus fumigatus Cyp51A mutations on bronchoalveolar lavage: a multicentre validation of the AsperGenius assay(R) in 201 patients with haematological disease suspected for invasive aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:3528–3535. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van Paassen J, Russcher A, In't Veld-van Wingerden AW, Verweij PE, Kuijper EJ. 2016. Emerging aspergillosis by azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus at an intensive care unit in the Netherlands, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill 21:30300. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.30.30300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rössler S, Bader O, Stölzel F, Sommer U, Spiess B, Geibel S, Buchheidt D, Gross U, Baretton G, Jacobs E. 2017. Progressive dispersion of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: fatal invasive aspergillosis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia infected with an A. fumigatus strain with a cyp51A TR46 Y121F M172I T289A allele. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00270-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00270-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alanio A, Denis B, Hamane S, Raffoux E, Peffault de la Tour R, Touratier S, Bergeron A, Bretagne S. 2016. New therapeutic strategies for invasive aspergillosis in the era of azole resistance: how should the prevalence of azole resistance be defined? J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2075–2078. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mair W, Lopez-Ruiz F, Stammler G, Clark W, Burnett F, Hollomon D, Ishii H, Thind TS, Brown JK, Fraaije B, Cools H, Shaw M, Fillinger S, Walker AS, Mellado E, Schnabel G, Mehl A, Oliver RP. 2016. Proposal for a unified nomenclature for target-site mutations associated with resistance to fungicides. Pest Manag Sci 72:1449–1459. doi: 10.1002/ps.4301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA, Wingard JR, Patterson TF, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 46:327–360. doi: 10.1086/525258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Patterson TF, Thompson GR III, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young JA, Bennett JE. 2016. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:e1–e60. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Munoz P, Alcala L, Sanchez Conde M, Palomo J, Yanez J, Pelaez T, Bouza E. 2003. The isolation of Aspergillus fumigatus from respiratory tract specimens in heart transplant recipients is highly predictive of invasive aspergillosis. Transplantation 75:326–329. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000044358.99414.B8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Horvath JA, Dummer S. 1996. The use of respiratory-tract cultures in the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Am J Med 100:171–178. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89455-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kwon-Chung KJ, Sugui JA. 2013. Aspergillus fumigatus—what makes the species a ubiquitous human fungal pathogen? PLoS Pathog 9:e1003743. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Xu J, Sharma C, Sundar G, Singh PK, Gaur SN, Hagen F, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2012. Clonal expansion and emergence of environmental multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR(34)/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in India. PLoS One 7:e52871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dunne K, Hagen F, Pomeroy N, Meis JF, Rogers TR. 29 March 2017. Inter-country transfer of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus on plant bulbs. Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/cix257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ahmad S, Joseph L, Hagen F, Meis JF, Khan Z. 2015. Concomitant occurrence of itraconazole-resistant and -susceptible strains of Aspergillus fumigatus in routine cultures. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:412–415. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kolwijck E, van der Hoeven H, de Sevaux RG, ten Oever J, Rijstenberg LL, van der Lee HA, Zoll J, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2016. Voriconazole-susceptible and voriconazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus coinfection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:927–929. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201510-2104LE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bader O, Tunnermann J, Dudakova A, Tangwattanachuleeporn M, Weig M, Gross U. 2015. Environmental isolates of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4356–4359. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00100-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tangwattanachuleeporn M, Minarin N, Saichan S, Sermsri P, Mitkornburee R, Gross U, Chindamporn A, Bader O. 2017. Prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment of Thailand. Med Mycol 55:429–435. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Le Pape P, Lavergne RA, Morio F, Alvarez-Moreno C. 2016. Multiple fungicide-driven alterations in azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Colombia, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 22:156–157. doi: 10.3201/eid2201.150978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Prigitano A, Venier V, Cogliati M, De Lorenzis G, Esposto MC, Tortorano AM. 2014. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment of northern Italy, May 2011 to June 2012. Euro Surveill 19:20747. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.12.20747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, van den Boom M, Yntema JB, Hagen F, Verweij PE, Meis JF. 2014. Multi-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment in Tanzania. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2979–2983. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rocchi S, Daguindau E, Grenouillet F, Deconinck E, Bellanger AP, Garcia-Hermoso D, Bretagne S, Reboux G, Millon L. 2014. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolate with the TR34/L98H mutation in both a fungicide-sprayed field and the lung of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient with invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 52:1724–1726. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03182-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van der Linden JW, Camps SM, Kampinga GA, Arends JP, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Haas PJ, Rijnders BJ, Kuijper EJ, van Tiel FH, Varga J, Karawajczyk A, Zoll J, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2013. Aspergillosis due to voriconazole highly resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and recovery of genetically related resistant isolates from domiciles. Clin Infect Dis 57:513–520. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ahmad S, Khan Z, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2014. Occurrence of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with TR34/L98H mutations in outdoor and hospital environment in Kuwait. Environ Res 133:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bhabhra R, Askew DS. 2005. Thermotolerance and virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus: role of the fungal nucleolus. Med Mycol 43(Suppl 1):S87–S93. doi: 10.1080/13693780400029486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.van der Linden JWM, Arendrup MC, van der Lee HAL, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE. 2009. Azole containing agar plates as a screening tool for azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycoses 52:19–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01781.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mortensen KL, Mellado E, Lass-Flörl C, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Johansen HK, Arendrup MC. 2010. Environmental study of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and other aspergilli in Austria, Denmark, and Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4545–4549. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00692-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Snelders E, Huis In't Veld RA, Rijs AJ, Kema GH, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2009. Possible environmental origin of resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to medical triazoles. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4053–4057. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00231-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Edlind TD, Henry KW, Metera KA, Katiyar SK. 2001. Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51 sequence: potential basis for fluconazole resistance. Med Mycol 39:299–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Leonardelli F, Macedo D, Dudiuk C, Cabeza MS, Gamarra S, Garcia-Effron G. 2016. Aspergillus fumigatus intrinsic fluconazole resistance is due to the naturally occurring T301I substitution in Cyp51Ap. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5420–5426. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00905-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Warrilow AG, Melo N, Martel CM, Parker JE, Nes WD, Kelly SL, Kelly DE. 2010. Expression, purification, and characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus sterol 14-alpha demethylase (CYP51) isoenzymes A and B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4225–4234. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00316-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mortensen KL, Jensen RH, Johansen HK, Skov M, Pressler T, Howard SJ, Leatherbarrow H, Mellado E, Arendrup MC. 2011. Aspergillus species and other molds in respiratory samples from patients with cystic fibrosis: a laboratory-based study with focus on Aspergillus fumigatus azole resistance. J Clin Microbiol 49:2243–2251. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00213-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dannaoui E, Meletiadis J, Tortorano AM, Symoens F, Nolard N, Viviani MA, Piens MA, Lebeau B, Verweij PE, Grillot R, EBGA Network. 2004. Susceptibility testing of sequential isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus recovered from treated patients. J Med Microbiol 53:129–134. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05326-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Howard SJ, Cerar D, Anderson MJ, Albarrag A, Fisher MC, Pasqualotto AC, Laverdiere M, Arendrup MC, Perlin DS, Denning DW. 2009. Frequency and evolution of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1068–1076. doi: 10.3201/eid1507.090043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Monzon A, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2008. Epidemiological cutoffs and cross-resistance to azole drugs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2468–2472. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00156-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hamprecht A, Buchheidt D, Vehreschild JJ, Cornely OA, Spiess B, Plum G, Halbsguth TV, Kutsch N, Stippel D, Kahl P, Persigehl T, Steinbach A, Bos B, Hallek M, Vehreschild MJ. 2012. Azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis in a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia in Germany. Euro Surveill 17:20262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pelaez T, Monteiro MC, Garcia-Rubio R, Bouza E, Gomez-Lopez A, Mellado E. 2015. First detection of Aspergillus fumigatus azole-resistant strain due to Cyp51A TR46/Y121F/T289A in an azole-naive patient in Spain. New Microbes New Infect 6:33–34. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Camps SM, van der Linden JW, Li Y, Kuijper EJ, van Dissel JT, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2012. Rapid induction of multiple resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus fumigatus during azole therapy: a case study and review of the literature. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:10–16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05088-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morio F, Aubin GG, Danner-Boucher I, Haloun A, Sacchetto E, Garcia-Hermoso D, Bretagne S, Miegeville M, Le Pape P. 2012. High prevalence of triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, especially mediated by TR/L98H, in a French cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1870–1873. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Alanio A, Cabaret O, Sitterle E, Costa JM, Brisse S, Cordonnier C, Bretagne S. 2012. Azole preexposure affects the Aspergillus fumigatus population in patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4948–4950. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05990-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fischer J, van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel S, Rietschel E, Vehreschild MJ, Wisplinghoff H, Kronke M, Hamprecht A. 2014. Prevalence and molecular characterization of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp. isolates from German cystic fibrosis patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1533–1536. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lavergne RA, Morio F, Favennec L, Dominique S, Meis JF, Gargala G, Verweij PE, Le Pape P. 2015. First description of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus due to TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4331–4335. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00127-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lazzarini C, Esposto MC, Prigitano A, Cogliati M, De Lorenzis G, Tortorano AM. 2015. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates from an Italian culture collection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:682–685. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02234-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.van Ingen J, van der Lee HA, Rijs TA, Zoll J, Leenstra T, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2015. Azole, polyene and echinocandin MIC distributions for wild-type, TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in the Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:178–181. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.van Ingen J, van der Lee HA, Rijs AJ, Snelders E, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2015. High-level pan-azole-resistant aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 53:2343–2345. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00502-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Astvad KM, Jensen RH, Hassan TM, Mathiasen EG, Thomsen GM, Pedersen UG, Christensen M, Hilberg O, Arendrup MC. 2014. First detection of TR46/Y121F/T289A and TR34/L98H alterations in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from azole-naive patients in Denmark despite negative findings in the environment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5096–5101. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02855-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Choukri F, Botterel F, Sitterle E, Bassinet L, Foulet F, Guillot J, Costa JM, Fauchet N, Dannaoui E. 2015. Prospective evaluation of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates in France. Med Mycol 53:593–596. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu M, Zeng R, Zhang L, Li D, Lv G, Shen Y, Zheng H, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Zheng N, Liu W. 2015. Multiple cyp51A-based mechanisms identified in azole-resistant isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus from China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4321–4325. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00003-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mohammadi F, Hashemi SJ, Zoll J, Melchers WJ, Rafati H, Dehghan P, Rezaie S, Tolooe A, Tamadon Y, van der Lee HA, Verweij PE, Seyedmousavi S. 2015. Quantitative analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism for rapid detection of TR34/L98H- and TR46/Y121F/T289A-positive Aspergillus fumigatus isolates obtained from patients in Iran from 2010 to 2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:387–392. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02326-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jensen RH, Hagen F, Astvad KM, Tyron A, Meis JF, Arendrup MC. 2016. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in Denmark: a laboratory-based study on resistance mechanisms and genotypes. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:570.e1–570.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chen Y, Lu Z, Zhao J, Zou Z, Gong Y, Qu F, Bao Z, Qiu G, Song M, Zhang Q, Liu L, Hu M, Han X, Tian S, Zhao J, Chen F, Zhang C, Sun Y, Verweij PE, Huang L, Han L. 2016. Epidemiology and molecular characterizations of azole resistance in clinical and environmental Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5878–5884. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01005-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Howard SJ, Pasqualotto AC, Denning DW. 2010. Azole resistance in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and Aspergillus bronchitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:683–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Albarrag AM, Anderson MJ, Howard SJ, Robson GD, Warn PA, Sanglard D, Denning DW. 2011. Interrogation of related clinical pan-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains: G138C, Y431C, and G434C single nucleotide polymorphisms in cyp51A, upregulation of cyp51A, and integration and activation of transposon Atf1 in the cyp51A promoter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5113–5121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00517-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mushi MF, Buname G, Bader O, Gross U, Mshana SE. 2016. Aspergillus fumigatus carrying TR34/L98H resistance allele causing complicated suppurative otitis media in Tanzania: call for improved diagnosis of fungi in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Infect Dis 16:464. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1796-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Snelders E, Karawajczyk A, Verhoeven RJ, Venselaar H, Schaftenaar G, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2011. The structure-function relationship of the Aspergillus fumigatus Cyp51A L98H conversion by site-directed mutagenesis: the mechanism of L98H azole resistance. Fungal Genet Biol 48:1062–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jeanvoine A, Rocchi S, Reboux G, Crini N, Crini G, Millon L. 12 May 2017. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in sawmills of Eastern France. J Appl Microbiol doi: 10.1111/jam.13488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nawrot U, Kurzyk E, Arendrup MC, Mroczynska M, Wlodarczyk K, Sulik-Tyszka B, Wroblewska M, Ussowicz M, Zdziarski P, Niewinska K, Brillowska-Dabrowska A. 4 March 2017. Detection of Polish clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates resistant to triazoles. Med Mycol doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zhang M, Feng CL, Chen F, He Q, Su X, Shi Y. 2017. Triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates obtained in Nanjing, China. Chin Med J (Engl) 130:665–668. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.201609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zhang J, Snelders E, Zwaan BJ, Schoustra SE, Meis JF, van Dijk K, Hagen F, van der Beek MT, Kampinga GA, Zoll J, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE, Debets AJM. 2017. A novel environmental azole resistance mutation in Aspergillus fumigatus and a possible role of sexual reproduction in its emergence. mBio 8:e00791-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00791-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Snelders E, Karawajczyk A, Schaftenaar G, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2010. Azole resistance profile of amino acid changes in Aspergillus fumigatus CYP51A based on protein homology modeling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2425–2430. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01599-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Garcia-Effron G, Dilger A, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Park S, Mellado E, Perlin DS. 2008. Rapid detection of triazole antifungal resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 46:1200–1206. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02330-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mellado E, Garcia-Effron G, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2007. A new Aspergillus fumigatus resistance mechanism conferring in vitro cross-resistance to azole antifungals involves a combination of cyp51A alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1897–1904. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01092-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mavridou E, Bruggemann RJ, Melchers WJ, Mouton JW, Verweij PE. 2010. Efficacy of posaconazole against three clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates with mutations in the cyp51A gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:860–865. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00931-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.van der Linden JW, Jansen RR, Bresters D, Visser CE, Geerlings SE, Kuijper EJ, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2009. Azole-resistant central nervous system aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 48:1111–1113. doi: 10.1086/597465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lockhart SR, Frade JP, Etienne KA, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Balajee SA. 2011. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from the ARTEMIS global surveillance study is primarily due to the TR/L98H mutation in the cyp51A gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4465–4468. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00185-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Burgel PR, Baixench MT, Amsellem M, Audureau E, Chapron J, Kanaan R, Honore I, Dupouy-Camet J, Dusser D, Klaassen CH, Meis JF, Hubert D, Paugam A. 2012. High prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in adults with cystic fibrosis exposed to itraconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:869–874. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05077-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rath PM, Buchheidt D, Spiess B, Arfanis E, Buer J, Steinmann J. 2012. First reported case of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus due to the TR/L98H mutation in Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6060–6061. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01017-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tashiro M, Izumikawa K, Minematsu A, Hirano K, Iwanaga N, Ide S, Mihara T, Hosogaya N, Takazono T, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, Kurihara S, Imamura Y, Miyazaki T, Nishino T, Tsukamoto M, Kakeya H, Yamamoto Y, Yanagihara K, Yasuoka A, Tashiro T, Kohno S. 2012. Antifungal susceptibilities of Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates obtained in Nagasaki, Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:584–587. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05394-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.van der Linden JW, Snelders E, Kampinga GA, Rijnders BJ, Mattsson E, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Kuijper EJ, Van Tiel FH, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2011. Clinical implications of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, The Netherlands, 2007–2009. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1846–1854. doi: 10.3201/eid1710.110226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Randhawa HS, Gaur SN, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2012. Isolation of multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in India. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:362–366. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Kathuria S, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2015. Prevalence and mechanism of triazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus in a referral chest hospital in Delhi, India and an update of the situation in Asia. Front Microbiol 6:428. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gregson L, Goodwin J, Johnson A, McEntee L, Moore CB, Richardson M, Hope WW, Howard SJ. 2013. In vitro susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus to isavuconazole: correlation with itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5778–5780. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01141-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wiederhold NP, Gil VG, Gutierrez F, Lindner JR, Albataineh MT, McCarthy DI, Sanders C, Fan H, Fothergill AW, Sutton DA. 2016. First detection of TR34 L98H and TR46 Y121F T289A cyp51 mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 54:168–171. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02478-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wu CJ, Wang HC, Lee JC, Lo HJ, Dai CT, Chou PH, Ko WC, Chen YC. 2015. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates carrying TR34/L98H mutations in Taiwan. Mycoses 58:544–549. doi: 10.1111/myc.12354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Badali H, Vaezi A, Haghani I, Yazdanparast SA, Hedayati MT, Mousavi B, Ansari S, Hagen F, Meis JF, Chowdhary A. 2013. Environmental study of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with TR34/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in Iran. Mycoses 56:659–663. doi: 10.1111/myc.12089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Vermeulen E, Maertens J, Schoemans H, Lagrou K. 2012. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus due to TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation emerging in Belgium, July 2012. Euro Surveill 17:20326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.da Silva Ferreira ME, Capellaro JL, dos Reis Marques E, Malavazi I, Perlin D, Park S, Anderson JB, Colombo AL, Arthington-Skaggs BA, Goldman MH, Goldman GH. 2004. In vitro evolution of itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus involves multiple mechanisms of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4405–4413. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4405-4413.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Diaz-Guerra TM, Mellado E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2003. A point mutation in the 14alpha-sterol demethylase gene cyp51A contributes to itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1120–1124. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1120-1124.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Garcia-Effron G, Mellado E, Gomez-Lopez A, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2005. Differences in interactions between azole drugs related to modifications in the 14-alpha sterol demethylase gene (cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2119–2121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.2119-2121.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Mellado E, Garcia-Effron G, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2004. Substitutions at methionine 220 in the 14alpha-sterol demethylase (Cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus are responsible for resistance in vitro to azole antifungal drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2747–2750. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2747-2750.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mann PA, Parmegiani RM, Wei SQ, Mendrick CA, Li X, Loebenberg D, DiDomenico B, Hare RS, Walker SS, McNicholas PM. 2003. Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus resulting in reduced susceptibility to posaconazole appear to be restricted to a single amino acid in the cytochrome P450 14alpha-demethylase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:577–581. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.577-581.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Howard SJ, Webster I, Moore CB, Gardiner RE, Park S, Perlin DS, Denning DW. 2006. Multi-azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 28:450–453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hagiwara D, Takahashi H, Fujimoto M, Sugahara M, Misawa Y, Gonoi T, Itoyama S, Watanabe A, Kamei K. 2016. Multi-azole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus harboring Cyp51A TR46/Y121F/T289A isolated in Japan. J Infect Chemother 22:577–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Leonardelli F, Theill L, Nardin ME, Macedo D, Dudiuk C, Mendez E, Gamarra S, Garcia-Effron G. 2017. First itraconazole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolate harbouring a G54E substitution in Cyp51Ap in South America. Rev Iberoam Micol 34:46–48. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Montesinos I, Argudin MA, Hites M, Ahajjam F, Dodemont M, Dagyaran C, Bakkali M, Etienne I, Jacobs F, Knoop C, Patteet S, Lagrou K. 2017. Culture-based methods and molecular tools for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus detection in a Belgian university hospital. J Clin Microbiol 55:2391–2399. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00520-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sharma C, Hagen F, Moroti R, Meis JF, Chowdhary A. 2015. Triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus harbouring G54 mutation: is it de novo or environmentally acquired? J Glob Antimicrob Resist 3:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Rybak JM, Marx KR, Nishimoto AT, Rogers PD. 2015. Isavuconazole: pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, and current clinical experience with a new triazole antifungal agent. Pharmacotherapy 35:1037–1051. doi: 10.1002/phar.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Balajee SA, Nickle D, Varga J, Marr KA. 2006. Molecular studies reveal frequent misidentification of Aspergillus fumigatus by morphotyping. Eukaryot Cell 5:1705–1712. doi: 10.1128/EC.00162-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Balajee SA, Houbraken J, Verweij PE, Hong SB, Yaghuchi T, Varga J, Samson RA. 2007. Aspergillus species identification in the clinical setting. Stud Mycol 59:39–46. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.59.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.De Hoog G, Guarro J, Figueras M. 2000. Atlas of clinical fungi, 2nd ed American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Faria-Ramos I, Farinha S, Neves-Maia J, Tavares PR, Miranda IM, Estevinho LM, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG. 2014. Development of cross-resistance by Aspergillus fumigatus to clinical azoles following exposure to prochloraz, an agricultural azole. BMC Microbiol 14:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Samson RA, Varga J. 2009. What is a species in Aspergillus? Med Mycol 47(Suppl 1):S13–S20. doi: 10.1080/13693780802354011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kocsube S, Varga J. 2017. Targeting conserved genes in Aspergillus species. Methods Mol Biol 1542:131–140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6707-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.De Carolis E, Posteraro B, Lass-Florl C, Vella A, Florio AR, Torelli R, Girmenia C, Colozza C, Tortorano AM, Sanguinetti M, Fadda G. 2012. Species identification of Aspergillus, Fusarium and Mucorales with direct surface analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:475–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Iriart X, Lavergne RA, Fillaux J, Valentin A, Magnaval JF, Berry A, Cassaing S. 2012. Routine identification of medical fungi by the new Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight system with a new time-effective strategy. J Clin Microbiol 50:2107–2110. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06713-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Bille E, Dauphin B, Leto J, Bougnoux ME, Beretti JL, Lotz A, Suarez S, Meyer J, Join-Lambert O, Descamps P, Grall N, Mory F, Dubreuil L, Berche P, Nassif X, Ferroni A. 2012. MALDI-TOF MS Andromas strategy for the routine identification of bacteria, mycobacteria, yeasts, Aspergillus spp. and positive blood cultures. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:1117–1125. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Houbraken J, Weig M, Gross U, Meijer M, Bader O. 2016. Aspergillus oerlinghausenensis, a new mould species closely related to A. fumigatus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363:fnv236. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Lass-Flörl C. 2010. In vitro susceptibility testing in Aspergillus species: an update. Future Microbiol 5:789–799. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Rex JH, Alexander BD, Andes D, Arthington-Skaggs B, Brown SD, Chaturveli V, Espinel-Ingroff A, Ghannoum MA, Knapp CC, Motyl MR, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pfaller JB, Sheehan DJ, Walsh T. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard—2nd ed CLSI document M38-A2, 2nd ed, vol 28 CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Espinel-Ingroff A, Fothergill A, Ghannoum M, Manavathu E, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pfaller M, Rinaldi M, Schell W, Walsh T. 2005. Quality control and reference guidelines for CLSI broth microdilution susceptibility method (M38-A document) for amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. J Clin Microbiol 43:5243–5246. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5243-5246.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2008. EUCAST technical note on the method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia-forming moulds. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:982–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Espinel-Ingroff A. 2006. Comparison of three commercial assays and a modified disk diffusion assay with two broth microdilution reference assays for testing zygomycetes, Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Cryptococcus neoformans with posaconazole and amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol 44:3616–3622. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01187-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Espinel-Ingroff A, Arthington-Skaggs B, Iqbal N, Ellis D, Pfaller MA, Messer S, Rinaldi M, Fothergill A, Gibbs DL, Wang A. 2007. Multicenter evaluation of a new disk agar diffusion method for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. J Clin Microbiol 45:1811–1820. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00134-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Szekely A, Johnson EM, Warnock DW. 1999. Comparison of E-test and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of molds. J Clin Microbiol 37:1480–1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Mills K, Bolmstrom A. 2000. In vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi: comparison of Etest and reference microdilution methods for determining itraconazole MICs. J Clin Microbiol 38:3359–3361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Arendrup MC, Verweij P, Nielsen HV. 2017. Evaluation of MIC strip isavuconazole test for susceptibility testing of wild-type and non-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01659-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01659-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Castro C, Serrano MC, Flores B, Espinel-Ingroff A, Martin-Mazuelos E. 2004. Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel with a modified NCCLS M38-A method to determine the activity of voriconazole against clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. J Clin Microbiol 42:4358–4360. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4358-4360.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Arendrup MC, Cuenca-Estrella M, Lass-Flörl C, Hope WW. 2013. Breakpoints for antifungal agents: an update from EUCAST focussing on echinocandins against Candida spp. and triazoles against Aspergillus spp. Drug Resist Updat 16:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Lass-Flörl C, Perkhofer S, Mayr A. 2010. In vitro susceptibility testing in fungi: a global perspective on a variety of methods. Mycoses 53:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Mosquera J, Denning DW. 2002. Azole cross-resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:556–557. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.556-557.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.EUCAST. 2015. Antifungal agents. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/AFST/Clinical_breakpoints/Antifungal_breakpoints_v_8.0_November_2015.pdf Accessed 5 January 2016.
- 134.Rex JH, Pfaller MA. 2002. Has antifungal susceptibility testing come of age? Clin Infect Dis 35:982–989. doi: 10.1086/342384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Vanden Bossche H, Koymans L, Moereels H. 1995. P450 inhibitors of use in medical treatment: focus on mechanisms of action. Pharmacol Ther 67:79–100. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(95)00011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Osherov N, Kontoyiannis DP, Romans A, May GS. 2001. Resistance to itraconazole in Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus is conferred by extra copies of the A. nidulans P-450 14alpha-demethylase gene, pdmA. J Antimicrob Chemother 48:75–81. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Taylor JW. 2014. Evolutionary perspectives on human fungal pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a019588. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Hawkins NJ, Cools HJ, Sierotzki H, Shaw MW, Knogge W, Kelly SL, Kelly DE, Fraaije BA. 2014. Paralog re-emergence: a novel, historically contingent mechanism in the evolution of antimicrobial resistance. Mol Biol Evol 31:1793–1802. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Mellado E, Diaz-Guerra TM, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. 2001. Identification of two different 14-alpha sterol demethylase-related genes (cyp51A and cyp51B) in Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus species. J Clin Microbiol 39:2431–2438. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2431-2438.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Martel CM, Parker JE, Warrilow AG, Rolley NJ, Kelly SL, Kelly DE. 2010. Complementation of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae ERG11/CYP51 (sterol 14alpha-demethylase) doxycycline-regulated mutant and screening of the azole sensitivity of Aspergillus fumigatus isoenzymes CYP51A and CYP51B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4920–4923. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00349-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Warrilow AG, Parker JE, Price CL, Nes WD, Kelly SL, Kelly DE. 2015. In vitro biochemical study of CYP51-mediated azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7771–7778. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01806-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Flowers SA, Colon B, Whaley SG, Schuler MA, Rogers PD. 2015. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:450–460. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03470-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Xiang MJ, Liu JY, Ni PH, Wang S, Shi C, Wei B, Ni YX, Ge HL. 2013. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res 13:386–393. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Hagiwara D, Watanabe A, Kamei K, Goldman GH. 2016. Epidemiological and genomic landscape of azole resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus fungi. Front Microbiol 7:1382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Hodiamont CJ, Dolman KM, Ten Berge IJ, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE, Pajkrt D. 2009. Multiple-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus osteomyelitis in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease successfully treated with long-term oral posaconazole and surgery. Med Mycol 47:217–220. doi: 10.1080/13693780802545600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Paul S, Klutts JS, Moye-Rowley WS. 2012. Analysis of promoter function in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell 11:1167–1177. doi: 10.1128/EC.00174-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kato M. 2005. An overview of the CCAAT-box binding factor in filamentous fungi: assembly, nuclear translocation, and transcriptional enhancement. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69:663–672. doi: 10.1271/bbb.69.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Brakhage AA, Andrianopoulos A, Kato M, Steidl S, Davis MA, Tsukagoshi N, Hynes MJ. 1999. HAP-like CCAAT-binding complexes in filamentous fungi: implications for biotechnology. Fungal Genet Biol 27:243–252. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.1999.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Paul RA, Rudramurthy SM, Meis JF, Mouton JW, Chakrabarti A. 2015. A novel Y319H substitution in CYP51C associated with azole resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6615–6619. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00637-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Zhao Y, Garnaud C, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Thiebaut-Bertrand A, Saint-Raymond C, Camara B, Hamidfar R, Cognet O, Maubon D, Cornet M, Perlin DS. 2016. Direct molecular diagnosis of aspergillosis and CYP51A profiling from respiratory samples of French patients. Front Microbiol 7:1164. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Araujo R, Gungor O, Amorim A. 2015. Single-tube PCR coupled with mini-sequencing assay for the detection of cyp51A and cyp51B polymorphisms in Aspergillus fumigatus. Future Microbiol 10:1797–1804. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Liu M, Zheng N, Li D, Zheng H, Zhang L, Ge H, Liu W. 2016. cyp51A-based mechanism of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: illustration by a new 3D structural model of Aspergillus fumigatus CYP51A protein. Med Mycol 54:400–408. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.O'Gorman CM, Fuller H, Dyer PS. 2009. Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 457:471–474. doi: 10.1038/nature07528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Abdolrasouli A, Rhodes J, Beale MA, Hagen F, Rogers TR, Chowdhary A, Meis JF, Armstrong-James D, Fisher MC. 2015. Genomic context of azole resistance mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus determined using whole-genome sequencing. mBio 6:e00536-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00536-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Tashiro M, Izumikawa K, Hirano K, Ide S, Mihara T, Hosogaya N, Takazono T, Morinaga Y, Nakamura S, Kurihara S, Imamura Y, Miyazaki T, Nishino T, Tsukamoto M, Kakeya H, Yamamoto Y, Yanagihara K, Yasuoka A, Tashiro T, Kohno S. 2012. Correlation between triazole treatment history and susceptibility in clinically isolated Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4870–4875. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00514-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Sanglard D. 2011. Probing the role of point mutations in the cyp51A gene from Aspergillus fumigatus in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Med Mycol 49:276–284. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.512926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Lescar J, Meyer I, Akshita K, Srinivasaraghavan K, Verma C, Palous M, Mazier D, Datry A, Fekkar A. 2014. Aspergillus fumigatus harbouring the sole Y121F mutation shows decreased susceptibility to voriconazole but maintained susceptibility to itraconazole and posaconazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:3244–3247. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Snelders E, Camps SM, Karawajczyk A, Rijs AJ, Zoll J, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2015. Genotype-phenotype complexity of the TR46/Y121F/T289A cyp51A azole resistance mechanism in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet Biol 82:129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Bellete B, Raberin H, Morel J, Flori P, Hafid J, Manhsung RT. 2010. Acquired resistance to voriconazole and itraconazole in a patient with pulmonary aspergilloma. Med Mycol 48:197–200. doi: 10.3109/13693780902717018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Krishnan-Natesan S, Chandrasekar PH, Alangaden GJ, Manavathu EK. 2008. Molecular characterisation of cyp51A and cyp51B genes coding for P450 14alpha-lanosterol demethylases A (CYP51Ap) and B (CYP51Bp) from voriconazole-resistant laboratory isolates of Aspergillus flavus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 32:519–524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Sharma C, Kumar R, Kathuria S, Kumar Singh P, Gupta D, Chowdhary A. 2016. Prevalence of azole resistance in clinical Aspergillus flavus isolates: presence of novel S196F, A324P, N423D and V465M substitutions in the cyp51C gene, abstr 4352. 26th Eur Congr Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Conf Abstr. [Google Scholar]
- 162.Liu W, Sun Y, Chen W, Liu W, Wan Z, Bu D, Li R. 2012. The T788G mutation in the cyp51C gene confers voriconazole resistance in Aspergillus flavus causing aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2598–2603. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05477-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Nierman WC, Yu J, Fedorova-Abrams ND, Losada L, Cleveland TE, Bhatnagar D, Bennett JW, Dean R, Payne GA. 2015. Genome sequence of Aspergillus flavus NRRL 3357, a strain that causes aflatoxin contamination of food and feed. Genome Announc 3:e00168-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00168-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Rudramurthy SM, Seyedmousavi S, Dhaliwal M, Chakrabarti A, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 7 November 2016. Pharmacodynamics of voriconazole against wild-type and azole-resistant Aspergillus flavus isolates in a non-neutropenic murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi: 10.1128/AAC.01491-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Arendrup MC, Jensen RH, Grif K, Skov M, Pressler T, Johansen HK, Lass-Florl C. 2012. In vivo emergence of Aspergillus terreus with reduced azole susceptibility and a Cyp51A M217I alteration. J Infect Dis 206:981–985. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Iatta R, Nuccio F, Immediato D, Mosca A, De Carlo C, Miragliotta G, Parisi A, Crescenzo G, Otranto D, Cafarchia C. 2016. Species distribution and in vitro azole susceptibility of Aspergillus section Nigri isolates from clinical and environmental settings. J Clin Microbiol 54:2365–2372. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01075-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Ahmad S, Khan Z, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2014. Simple, low-cost molecular assays for TR34/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene for rapid detection of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 52:2223–2227. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00408-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Howard SJ, Arendrup MC. 2011. Acquired antifungal drug resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: epidemiology and detection. Med Mycol 49(Suppl 1):S90–S95. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.508469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Chen J, Li H, Li R, Bu D, Wan Z. 2005. Mutations in the cyp51A gene and susceptibility to itraconazole in Aspergillus fumigatus serially isolated from a patient with lung aspergilloma. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:31–37. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Camps SM, Rijs AJ, Klaassen CH, Meis JF, O'Gorman CM, Dyer PS, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2012. Molecular epidemiology of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates harboring the TR34/L98H azole resistance mechanism. J Clin Microbiol 50:2674–2680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00335-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Montesinos I, Dodemont M, Lagrou K, Jacobs F, Etienne I, Denis O. 2014. New case of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus due to TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:3439–3440. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Weber M, Schaer J, Walther G, Kaerger K, Steinmann J, Rath PM, Spiess B, Buchheidt D, Hamprecht A, Kurzai O. 11 March 2017. FunResDB—a web resource for genotypic susceptibility testing of Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Koehler P, Hamprecht A, Bader O, Bekeredjian-Ding I, Buchheidt D, Doelken G, Elias J, Haase G, Hahn-Ast C, Karthaus M, Kekule A, Keller P, Kiehl M, Krause SW, Kramer C, Neumann S, Rohde H, La Rosee P, Ruhnke M, Schafhausen P, Schalk E, Schulz K, Schwartz S, Silling G, Staib P, Ullmann A, Vergoulidou M, Weber T, Cornely OA, Vehreschild MJ. 2017. Epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis and azole resistance in patients with acute leukaemia: the SEPIA Study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:218–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Spiess B, Postina P, Reinwald M, Cornely OA, Hamprecht A, Hoenigl M, Lass-Flörl C, Rath PM, Steinmann J, Miethke T, Lauten M, Will S, Merker N, Hofmann WK, Buchheidt D. 2014. Incidence of cyp51A key mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus—a study on primary clinical samples of immunocompromised patients in the period of 1995–2013. PLoS One 9:e103113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Spiess B, Seifarth W, Merker N, Howard SJ, Reinwald M, Dietz A, Hofmann WK, Buchheidt D. 2012. Development of novel PCR assays to detect azole resistance-mediating mutations of the Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A gene in primary clinical samples from neutropenic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3905–3910. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05902-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Chong GL, van de Sande WW, Dingemans GJ, Gaajetaan GR, Vonk AG, Hayette MP, van Tegelen DW, Simons GF, Rijnders BJ. 2015. Validation of a new Aspergillus real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Aspergillus and azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Clin Microbiol 53:868–874. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03216-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.White PL, Posso RB, Barnes RA. 2015. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the PathoNostics AsperGenius assay for detection of invasive aspergillosis and resistance to azole antifungal drugs during testing of serum samples. J Clin Microbiol 53:2115–2121. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00667-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Coste A, Turner V, Ischer F, Morschhauser J, Forche A, Selmecki A, Berman J, Bille J, Sanglard D. 2006. A mutation in Tac1p, a transcription factor regulating CDR1 and CDR2, is coupled with loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 5 to mediate antifungal resistance in Candida albicans. Genetics 172:2139–2156. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.054767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Hagiwara D, Miura D, Shimizu K, Paul S, Ohba A, Gonoi T, Watanabe A, Kamei K, Shintani T, Moye-Rowley WS, Kawamoto S, Gomi K. 2017. A novel Zn2-Cys6 transcription factor AtrR plays a key role in an azole resistance mechanism of Aspergillus fumigatus by co-regulating cyp51A and cdr1B expressions. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006096. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Blatzer M, Barker BM, Willger SD, Beckmann N, Blosser SJ, Cornish EJ, Mazurie A, Grahl N, Haas H, Cramer RA. 2011. SREBP coordinates iron and ergosterol homeostasis to mediate triazole drug and hypoxia responses in the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Genet 7:e1002374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Lamoth F, Juvvadi PR, Soderblom EJ, Moseley MA, Asfaw YG, Steinbach WJ. 2014. Identification of a key lysine residue in heat shock protein 90 required for azole and echinocandin resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:1889–1896. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02286-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Losada L, Sugui JA, Eckhaus MA, Chang YC, Mounaud S, Figat A, Joardar V, Pakala SB, Pakala S, Venepally P, Fedorova N, Nierman WC, Kwon-Chung KJ. 2015. Genetic analysis using an isogenic mating pair of Aspergillus fumigatus identifies azole resistance genes and lack of MAT locus's role in virulence. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004834. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.de Valk HA, Meis JF, Curfs IM, Muehlethaler K, Mouton JW, Klaassen CH. 2005. Use of a novel panel of nine short tandem repeats for exact and high-resolution fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:4112–4120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.4112-4120.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Gao LJ, Sun Y, Wan Z, Li RY, Yu J. 2013. CSP typing of Chinese Aspergillus fumigatus isolates: identification of additional CSP types. Med Mycol 51:683–687. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.770609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Kidd SE, Nik Zulkepeli NA, Slavin MA, Morrissey CO. 2009. Utility of a proposed CSP typing nomenclature for Australian Aspergillus fumigatus isolates: identification of additional CSP types and suggested modifications. J Microbiol Methods 78:223–226. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Klaassen CH, de Valk HA, Balajee SA, Meis JF. 2009. Utility of CSP typing to sub-type clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates and proposal for a new CSP type nomenclature. J Microbiol Methods 77:292–296. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Garcia-Rubio R, Gil H, Monteiro MC, Pelaez T, Mellado E. 2016. A new Aspergillus fumigatus typing method based on hypervariable tandem repeats located within exons of surface protein coding genes (TRESP). PLoS One 11:e0163869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Ashu EE, Hagen F, Chowdhary A, Meis JF, Xu J. 2017. Global population genetic analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus. mSphere 2:e00019-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00019-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Valsecchi I, Mellado E, Beau R, Raj S, Latge JP. 2015. Fitness studies of azole-resistant strains of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7866–7869. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01594-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Vazquez JA, Manavathu EK. 2016. Molecular characterization of a voriconazole-resistant, posaconazole-susceptible Aspergillus fumigatus isolate in a lung transplant recipient in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1129–1133. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01130-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Astvad KMT, Hare RK, Arendrup MC. 2017. Evaluation of the in vitro activity of isavuconazole and comparator voriconazole against 2635 contemporary clinical Candida and Aspergillus isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017:S1198-743X(17)30192-1. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.van der Linden JW, Snelders E, Arends JP, Daenen SM, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2010. Rapid diagnosis of azole-resistant aspergillosis by direct PCR using tissue specimens. J Clin Microbiol 48:1478–1480. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02221-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Denning DW, Park S, Lass-Flörl C, Fraczek MG, Kirwan M, Gore R, Smith J, Bueid A, Moore CB, Bowyer P, Perlin DS. 2011. High-frequency triazole resistance found in nonculturable Aspergillus fumigatus from lungs of patients with chronic fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis 52:1123–1129. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Klaassen CH, de Valk HA, Curfs-Breuker IM, Meis JF. 2010. Novel mixed-format real-time PCR assay to detect mutations conferring resistance to triazoles in Aspergillus fumigatus and prevalence of multi-triazole resistance among clinical isolates in the Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:901–905. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]