Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the roles of microRNA (miR)-138 and interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). miR-138 and ISG15 expression in cancer tissues was detected, and the influence on proliferation, migration and invasion of OSCC cell lines was assessed. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to analyze the expression of miR-138 and ISG15 in resected cancer tissues and pericancerous tissues harvested from patients with OSCC. The protein level of ISG15 was determined via western blot analysis. The constructed pGCMV/EGFP/miR-138 plasmid was transfected into CAL27 and SCC-15 OSCC cell lines via a liposome method to upregulate miR-138 expression. The transfection efficiency was determined based on miR-138 expression levels, and changes in proliferation, migration and invasion were subsequently compared with those in untransfected cells. The expression of ISG15 mRNA and protein was also detected in OSCC cells. miR-138 was significantly downregulated (P<0.05) in cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues in patients with OSCC, whereas ISG15 mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in pericancerous tissues (P<0.05). ISG15 protein levels were also significantly higher in pericancerous tissues (P<0.05). ISG15 protein and mRNA levels were significantly decreased in the transfected cells compared with the untransfected cells, which indicated that miR-138 overexpression inhibited ISG15 expression. Additionally, the invasion, migration and proliferation abilities of successfully transfected CAL27 and SCC-15 cells were significantly decreased compared with the untransfected cells (P<0.05). The results of the present study suggest that miR-138 functions as a tumor-suppressive miR and serves an important role in OSCC via regulating ISG15 expression. These findings suggest that miR-138 is able to inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion of OSCC cell lines.
Keywords: microRNA-138, oral squamous cell carcinoma, interferon-stimulated gene 15
Introduction
Oral cancer is the sixth most prevalent form of cancer, with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) having the highest morbidity of all head and neck cancers (1). Patients with OSCC typically have a poor prognosis due to its invasion and migration capabilities, and the five-year survival rate is <50% (1). The underlying mechanisms of OSCC development were complex and dependent on regulation at the DNA, transcriptional, post-transcriptional and protein levels (2). microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are a class of 20–25 nucleotide endogenous non-coding RNAs (3). miRNAs are able to regulate various biological processes, such as metabolism, differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis (4). Numerous studies have demonstrated that miRNAs are able to serve as oncogenes and tumor suppressors, and participate in the development of cancers via regulating tumor cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and other biological processes by degrading mRNA or inhibiting translation of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes (5,6). miRNAs have been demonstrated to be associated with the development and progression of cancers, and they may have potential applications as biomarkers for the diagnosis of various cancers (7). miR-138 has previously been demonstrated to serve as a tumor suppressor gene in nasopharyngeal cancer (8), liver cancer (9) and ovarian cancer (10); however, the roles of miR-138 in the development and progression of OSCC remain to be elucidated.
The ubiquitin proteasome pathway (UPP) is an important mechanism underlying intracellular protein degradation (11). Following ubiquitination, the modified proteins will be degraded by proteasome (11). Interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) is a small protein with a low molecular weight induced by the expression of type I interferon, which is an upstream regulator in the UPP pathway. A previous study revealed that UPP participates widely in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis (12). Desai et al (13) demonstrated that the overexpression of ISG15 in cancer cells is able to negatively regulate ubiquitin-26S UPP via inhibiting the poly-ubiquitination of target proteins. ISG15 was also demonstrated to be upregulated in breast cancer, ovarian cancer and prostate cancer cells, whereas the corresponding ubiquitinated proteins were downregulated (13). ISG15 was also upregulated in cancer tissues from patients with pancreatic, endometrial and bladder cancer compared with pericancerous tissues (14). Andersen et al (15) demonstrated that ISG15 was highly expressed in bladder cancer tissues and that expression levels were significantly associated with the malignant grading. In the present study the expression and roles of miR-138 and ISG15 were investigated in patients with OSCC along with bioinformatic predictions.
Materials and methods
Collection of cancer tissues
The present study included a total of 20 patients with OSCC who underwent surgical resection at the Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou Medical College (Luzhou, China) between December 2013 and December 2014. Patients had an average age of 56 years, and there were 12 males and 8 females. Prior to surgery, all patients were diagnosed with OSCC by pathologists. Patients received no radiotherapy, chemotherapy or other adjuvant therapies. Cancer tissues and pericancerous tissues were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C within 10 min of being harvested. Prior written and informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Luzhou Medical College.
Bioinformatics prediction
Targetscan (www.targetscan.org) was used to analyze the miRNA binding sites in the ISG15 mRNA 3′-untranslated region (UTR). The candidate miRNAs were listed based on the scores assigned by Targetscan. Combined with the results of a literature review, miR-138 was selected for use in the present study.
Cell culture and transfection
Two OSCC cell lines, CAL27 and SCC-15 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA), were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) containing L-glucose (Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) (FBS). Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used to transfect CAL27 and SCC-15 cells according to the manufacture's protocol. At 24 h prior to transfection, 2×105 log-growth cells were seeded in 24-well plates. Cells were divided into three groups based on their transfection status: i) miR-138 group (transfected with pGCMV/EGFP/miR-138 vector); ii) Neg-miR-138 group (Mock); and iii) control group (Blank). Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used for transfection according to the manufacturer's protocol. A total of 2 µg pGCMV/EGFP/miR-138 vector and 1 µl Lipofectamine 2000 was added into Eppendorf tubes containing 50 µl Opti Memi medium. The tube was left to stand for 5 min at room temperature, mixed together and subsequently left to stand for a further 20 min at room temperature. When cell density reached ~60%, cells were added to 24-well plates. The H-DMEM containing 10% FBS was replaced 6 h post-transfection and cells were harvested at 48 h post-transfection. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to detect the expression of miR-138 in the collected cells to determine the transfection efficiency.
RNA extraction and RT
Total RNA was isolated from tissues using 1 ml TRIzol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) reagent per 100 mg, according to the manufacturer's protocol. For transfected CAL27 and SCC-15 cells, 2×105 cells were treated with 1 ml TRIzol reagent. The phenol-chloroform method was used to extract total RNA as described previously (16). RNA integrity was verified via gel electrophoresis using 2% agarose gel, and the purity of RNA was detected using a spectrophotometer. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA via reverse transcription with the Reverse Transcription System (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and stored at −20°C. The reverse transcription system included: 6 µl miRNA template, 10 µl 2X miRNA Reaction Buffer Mix, 2 µl 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 2 µl miRNA PrimeScript RT Enzyme Mixture (all Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) to give a total reaction volume of 20 µl. The reaction was performed at 37°C for 60 min with PolyA primer. A total of 100 µl RNase free H2O was subsequently added and 2 µl was removed and used for quantitative detection.
Detection of miR-138 by RT-qPCR
The Takara PrimeScript kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) was used for the RT-qPCR, and miR-138 was detected using SYBR green RT-qPCR with U6 as an internal reference. The primers for miR-138 were forward 5′-GACCCAGATTCCACCATAT-3′ and reverse (Uni-miR qPCR Primer) 5′-CAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′. The reaction system included 12.5 µl SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), 1 µl PCR Forward Primer (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), 1 µl Uni-miR qPCR Primer (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), 2 µl template and 8 µl double distilled (dd) H2O. Each sample had 3 replicates. The cycle conditions were as follows: 95°C for 30 sec, 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 20 sec. The relative expression of miR-138 was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCq method compared with U6 (17).
ISG15 detection by RT-qPCR
The SYBR Green RT-qPCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Inc., Wilmington, MA, USA) was used to detect the expression of ISG15 in different specimens with GAPDH as an internal reference. The primers for ISG15 were forward 5′-GCGCAGATCACCCAGAAGAT-3′ and reverse 5′-GTTCGTCGCATTTGTCCACC-3′. The reaction system included 10 µl SYBR EX Taq-Mix, 0.5 µl forward primer, 0.5 µl reverse primer, 1 µl cDNA template and 8 µl ddH2O. Each sample had 3 replicates. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, 25 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 40 sec, 72°C for 30 sec and finally 72°C for 1 min. The relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (17).
Western blot analysis
A total of 50 mg of each tissue was ground into a powder with liquid nitrogen, and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay for 20 min at 4°C (50 mM Tris-base (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), 1% TritonX-100, 1% Sodium deoxycholate lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 g/min for 5 min at 4°C. Proteins from transfected cells were collected via trypsin digestion (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The protein concentration was detected using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). A total of 50 µl protein was mixed with an equal volume of 2X SDS loading buffer and boiled at 100°C for 5 min. The proteins (2 µg per lane) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (100 V constant voltage) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (300 mA constant current at 4°C). The membrane then was blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBS-Tween 20 (TBST) buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the primary rabbit anti-human ISG15 (ab92345; 1:1,000) and rabbit anti-human GAPDH antibodies (ab204481; 1:2,000) were added and incubated overnight at 4°C. Following washing with TBST 3 times, the secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (ab6721; 1:1,000) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. All the antibodies were supplied by Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Finally, after washing with TBST for 3 times, the membrane was developed via enhanced chemiluminescence plus reagent (EMD Millipore, Billerca, MA, USA). The developed film was scanned and quantified using Image Lab 4.0 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). GAPDH was used as an internal control to calculate the relative expression of ISG15. The experiment was repeated three times.
Cell migration assay
Migration assays were performed using a Transwell chamber (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). Transfected cells of the miR-138, mock and control groups were collected using trypsin and re-suspended in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA to give a concentration of 5×105 cells/ml. A total of 200 µl cell medium, containing 1×105 cells, was seeded into the upper chamber and the bottom chamber was incubated with 750 µl medium containing 20% FBS. Cells were cultured at 37°C for 4 h and cells in the upper chamber were scratched with a cotton swab. The cells in the lower chamber were fixed with formaldehyde at 22°C for 15 min and stained using 0.1% crystal violet at 22°C for 20 min. Cells were then counted under a light microscope, and 3 fields were observed in each group. At 24, 48 and 72 h post-transfection, the three groups of CAL27 and SCC-15 cells (control, miR-138 and Neg-miR-138 groups) were mixed with 20 µl MTT solution (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Cells were incubated for 4 h at 37°C and the culture supernatant was subsequently discarded. A further 150 µl MTT solution was added and the absorbance of CAL27 and SCC-15 cells was measured at 492 nm. The experiment was repeated three times.
Cell invasion assay
The invasion of CAL27 and SCC-15 cell lines was analyzed using a Transwell chamber (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). In the Transwell chambers, 500 µl serum-free DMEM was added and placed at room temperature for 1 h for matrigel hydration. The lower chamber was incubated with 750 µl DMEM containing 20% FBS. The transfected cells of the miR-138, mock and control groups were re-suspended to give a concentration of 4×105 cells/ml. A total of 500 µl cell suspension was added to each chamber and subsequently cultured for 18 h at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells in the upper chamber were scratched with a cotton swab and cells in the lower chamber were fixed with 100% formaldehyde for 5 min at 22°C and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min at 22°C. The number of cells was subsequently counted under a light microscope. The experiment was repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and differences were determined using two-tailed Student's t-tests. P<0.05 was considered to indicated a statistically significant difference.
Results
ISG15 expression in OSCC tissues
To investigate the role of ISG15 in OSCC tissues, RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of ISG15 mRNA. The results revealed that ISG15 expression was significantly upregulated in OSCC tumor tissues compared with pericancerous tissues (P<0.05; Fig. 1A).
Western blot analysis was used to evaluate the ISG15 protein expression in OSCC tissues and associated pericancerous tissues. Expression of ISG15 protein was significantly higher in OSCC tissues compared with pericancerous tissues (P<0.05; Fig. 1B), consistent with mRNA expression. These findings indicate that ISG15 expression is modulated during the development and progression of OSCC.
Bioinformatics prediction and miR-138 expression in OSCC
TargetScan was used to predict potential miRNAs for complementary binding to the ISG15 3′UTR (Fig. 2A). Based on these results combined with a literature review, miR-138 was selected for the present study.
To further investigate the mechanisms of miR-138 in OSCC tissues, RT-qPCR was used to detect miR-138 expression, which was significantly downregulated in OSCC tumor tissues compared with pericancerous tissues (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). These results suggest that miR-138 participated in the regulation of OSCC.
miR-138 inhibits ISG15 expression
To investigate how miR-138 regulates the expression of ISG15, a pGCMV/EGFP/miR-138 overexpression plasmid was constructed. The liposome method was used to transfect CAL27 and SCC-15 cell lines. At 48 h post-transfection, transfection efficiency was determined by validating miR-138 expression. miR-138 expression was significantly higher in the miR-138 group compared with mock and control groups, in both cell lines (P<0.05; Fig. 3A). RT-qPCR and western blot analysis were used to detect the expression of ISG15 mRNA and protein in transfected cells. The results demonstrated that miR-138 overexpression is able to significantly decrease the expression of IGS15 mRNA protein, compared with the mock and control groups, in both cell lines (P<0.05; Fig. 3B and C). These findings indicated that miR-138 was able to inhibit the transcription of ISG15 mRNA and translation of ISG15 protein.
miR-138 inhibits invasion, migration and proliferation of CAL27 and SCC-15 cells
Matrigel and Transwell chambers were used to investigate the invasion and migration of differently transfected cells. It was demonstrated that miR-138 overexpression significantly repressed the migration and invasion abilities of CAL27 and SCC-15 cells compared with mock and control groups (P<0.05; Fig. 4A and B). These findings indicate that miR-138 was able to inhibition roles on OSCC cell movement.
MTT assay was used to detect the changes in proliferation of CAL27 and SCC-15 cells. Proliferation activity was significantly lower in the miR-138 group than in mock and control groups (P<0.05; Fig. 4C), which indicates that miR-138 is able to repress the proliferation of CAL27 and SCC-15 cell lines.
Discussion
ISG15 is a small molecular weight protein whose expression is induced by interferon (18). It was first identified as an ubiquitin-like modified protein and was named ubiquitin cross-reactive protein as its structure was similar to ubiquitin (18). Ubiquitin is a highly conserved small molecule that exists widely in eukaryotes and participates in protein degradation via protein modification in an enzyme cascade reaction (19). Similarly, ISG15 is involved in the regulation of various biological processes via binding to target proteins through a series of enzyme reactions to bind to the target protein (20,21). At present, >200 ISG15 target proteins have been identified in virus-infected cells or tumor cells, which suggests that ISG15 serves important roles in immune regulation and tumor development (21,22). It has previously been demonstrated that ISG15 is differentially expressed in different tumor cells and different cell lines from same histologic origin (15). In the present study, RT-qPCR and western blot analysis were used to detect ISG15 expression in OSCC tumor tissues and pericancerous tissues. The results demonstrated that that the expression of ISG15 mRNA and protein was significantly higher in tumors than in adjacent control tissues. Using bioinformatics, it was predicted that miR-138 was able to complementarily bind to the ISG15 3′UTR. In the present study, it was demonstrated that miR-138 expression was significantly lower in cancer tissues than in adjacent tissues, which indicates that ISG15 expression is associated with miR-138 expression.
miRNA broadly participates in the regulation of protein translation and mRNA stability (23). In order to investigate this further, a vector was constructed to induce miR-138 overexpression in cells. The CAL27 and SCC-15 cells were chosen for the present study and successfully transfected with the vector. It was demonstrated that miR-138 overexpression was able to repress ISG15 mRNA and protein levels, which indicates that miR-138 may regulate ISG15 expression via directly binding to the 3′UTR of ISG15. Proliferation, migration and invasion of CAL27 and SCC-15 miR-138 overexpression cells were assessed using MTT and Transwell assays. The results demonstrated that miR-138 decreased invasion and migration capability in CAL27 and SCC-15 cell lines and also induced a decrease in proliferation. Previous results have indicated that overexpression of ISG15 decreases the expression of poly-ubiquitinated proteins, which negatively regulates the ubiquitin pathway and poly-ubiquitin protein level (13). The level of poly-ubiquitination is a key factor to degrade target protein by proteasome (24). ISG15 is able to regulate the invasion and migration of tumor through ubiquitin induced protein modification (25). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that miR-138 may be able to regulate the biological processes of OSCC via repressing ISG15 expression. MiR-138 may serve a role by regulating the upstream factors in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. miR-138 may have potential applications as a novel biomarker for the early diagnosis and prognosis of OSCC.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the Applied Basic Research Projects in Sichuan Province (grant no. 2013JY0126) and the Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (grant no. 14JC0054).
References
- 1.Van Zyl A, Bunn BK. Clinical features of oral cancer. SADJ. 2012;67:566–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Williams HK. Molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous carcinoma. Mol Pathol. 2000;53:165–172. doi: 10.1136/mp.53.4.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science. 2001;294:853–858. doi: 10.1126/science.1064921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cai Y, Yu X, Hu S, Yu J. A brief review on the mechanisms of miRNA regulation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2009;7:147–154. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(08)60044-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kong YW, Ferland-McCollough D, Jackson TJ, Bushell M. microRNAs in cancer management. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e249–e258. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lopez-Camarillo C, Marchat LA, Arechaga-Ocampo E, Perez-Plasencia C, Del Moral-Hernandez O, Castaneda-Ortiz EJ, Rodriguez-Cuevas S. MetastamiRs: Non-coding microRNAs driving cancer invasion and metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:1347–1379. doi: 10.3390/ijms13021347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:857–866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu X, Lv XB, Wang XP, Sang Y, Xu S, Hu K, Wu M, Liang Y, Liu P, Tang J, et al. MiR-138 suppressed nasopharyngeal carcinoma growth and tumorigenesis by targeting the CCND1 oncogene. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:2495–2506. doi: 10.4161/cc.20898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang W, Zhao LJ, Tan YX, Ren H, Qi ZT. MiR-138 induces cell cycle arrest by targeting cyclin D3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1113–1120. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yeh YM, Chuang CM, Chao KC, Wang LH. MicroRNA-138 suppresses ovarian cancer cell invasion and metastasis by targeting SOX4 and HIF-lα. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:867–878. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: Destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:373–428. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Friedman J, Xue D. To live or die by the sword: The regulation of apoptosis by the proteasome. Dev Cell. 2004;6:460–461. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Desai SD, Haas AL, Wood LM, Tsai YC, Pestka S, Rubin EH, Saleem A, Nur-E-Kamal A, Liu LF. Elevated expression of ISG15 in tumor cells interferes with the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway. Cancer Res. 2006;66:921–928. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sato Y, Kamura T, Shirata N, Murata T, Kudoh A, Iwahori S, Nakayama S, Isomura H, Nishiyama Y, Tsurumi T. Degradation of phosphorylated P53 by viral protein-ESC E3 ligase complex. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000530. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Andersen JB, Aaboe M, Borden EC, Goloubeva OG, Hassel BA, Orntoft TF. Stage-associated overexpression of the ubiquitin-like protein, ISG15, in bladder cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1465–1471. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Puissant C, Houdebine LM. An improvement of the single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Biotechniques. 1990;8:148–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-tie quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reich N, Evans B, Levy D, Fahey D, Knight E, Jr, Darnell JE., Jr Interferon-induced transcription of a gene encoding a 15-kDa protein depends on an upstream enhancer element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:6394–6398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.18.6394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Husnjak K, Dikic I. Ubiquitin-binding proteins: Decoders of ubiquitin-mediated cellular functions. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:291–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051810-094654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao C, Denison C, Huibregtse JM, Gygi S, Krug RM. Human ISG15 conjugation targets both IFN-induced and constitutively expressed proteins functioning in diverse cellular pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10200–10205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504754102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Andersen JB, Hassel BA. The interferon regulated ubiquitin-like protein, ISG15, in tumorigenesis: Friend or foe? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jeon YJ, Yoo HM, Chung CH. ISG15 and immune diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802:485–496. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang Y, Shen XJ, Zou Q, Wang SP, Tang SM, Zhang GZ. Biological functions of microRNAs: A review. J Physiol Biochem. 2011;67:129–139. doi: 10.1007/s13105-010-0050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krämer OH, Zhu P, Ostendorff HP, Golebiewski M, Tiefenbach J, Peters MA, Brill B, Groner B, Bach I, Heinzel T, Göttlicher M. The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid selectively induces proteasomal degradation of HDAC2. EMBO J. 2003;22:3411–3420. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Desai SD, Reed RE, Burks J, Wood LM, Pullikuth AK, Haas AL, Liu LF, Breslin JW, Meiners S, Sankar S. ISG15 disrupts cytoskeletal architecture and promotes motility in human breast cancer cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2012;237:38–49. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2011.011236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]