Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2017 Jul 20;14(3):2431–2433. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4826

High mobility group box 1 in diabetic nephropathy

Haitao Shi 1,*, Yingqi Che 2,*, Lin Bai 1, Jinling Zhang 1, Jingxu Fan 1, Huiling Mao 3,
PMCID: PMC5609311  PMID: 28962177

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex disorder caused by the combined effects of genetic inheritance and environmental factors. The abnormal secretion of albumin via urine is the characteristic feature of a diabetic nephropathy (DN) patient. Moreover, the detection of this observable characteristic feature of DN is quite late. As a result the time, at which DN is observable, large extent of kidney damage has already occurred. Thus, this late observation significantly decreases the chances of efficient management of DN and associated outcomes. The current biomarker used to detect DN is microalbuminuria, the presence of albumin in the urine. However, the current biomarkers often lead to false negative results. The high mobility group box (HMGB)1 is an upcoming molecule being explored for its application in the management of DN. The present review enlightens the current status of HMGB1 in DN.

Keywords: diabetic nephropathy, high mobility group box 1, biomarkers

1. Introduction

The clinical observance of significant loss in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a direct indicator of diabetic nephropathy (DN) and is also associated with urine albumin excretion (1). Furthermore, DN is the most common causative agent for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). ESRD is also the result of type 2 diabetes (T2D) but is treatable. On the whole, in the United States, DN is the more prevailing cause of ESRD as compared to T2D.

DN is associated with high mortality as well as high morbidity rates during cardiovascular disease, long before ESRD (2). At present, many studies have explored DN extensively leading to information useable for the identification of DN at quite an early stage. However, the exact knowledge of pathophysiology of DN is still pending. Most of the confirmed factors identified for detection of DN include non-modifiable risk factors such as ethnicity, family history and elevated GFR early after diagnosis of T2D have been proven in many studies. Risk factors for developing DN that could be modified are glycemia, hypertension, smoking status, obesity and dyslipidemia. Research has shown that if the patients take good care of the modified risk factors such as glycemic controls, the progress of developing DN could be delayed.

2. Current views of DN

The state of untreated DN is the prime initiator of ESRD (3). The current biomarker used to detect DN is microalbuminuria, indicating extent of albumin secretion by the body via urination (4). The above technique involves recording of albumin-to-creatinine ration most probably in the first urine of the affected patient. The process of recording above ratio continues for 24 h at regular intervals within a day. The prime advantages of the biomarker are its efficacy, accuracy and ease of performing analyses both for patient as well as technician. Moreover, cost wise also it is very economical. However, limitation of this biomarker are biased results due to variable urine concentrations, diet factors or urinary tract infection. With the presence of microalbuminuria, National Kidney Foundation (5) classification has suggested that the levels of GFR might be exploited for the accurate staging of chronic kidney disease.

3. Serum creatinine levels during DN

One of the most efficient indices used for the determination of clinical health of kidneys is serum creatinine levels (6). The prime route for the metabolism of creatinine produced by muscles is via by glomerular filtration. So, during abnormal functioning of kidneys, GFR is affected leading to elevation in the creatinine levels. On the other hand, the only limitation associated with the test that it is unable to detect DN at an early stage. It is applicable only after marked damages to kidney nephrons. Another limitation is that sexes and age of the patient affect serum creatinine levels, so chances of false lows are more in both women and old patients. Cystatin C is another upcoming indicator of falling GFR (7). A study in the recent past also conformed the dependence of excretion of creatinine on its dietary intake, thus, more the intake the more is the excretion of creatinine (8).

4. HMGB1

HMGB1 is a profuse non-histone chromatin, component well known for its dual DNA binding domains viz. HMG box A and B (9). The high affinity of high mobility group box (HMGB)1 for DNA is its characteristic feature. In cancer, elevated levels of HMGB1 are correlated well with cancer progression in the form of invasion and metastasis (10). It is associated with tumor metastasis as it is able to modulate cell adhesive properties and extracellular matrix components (10).

5. HMGB1, DN and RAGE

The interaction with a member of immunoglobulin superfamily viz. receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is the prime pathway for the activation of HMGB1 (11). RAGE is abundant in various tissues and cells including heart, lungs, kidney, brain, skeletal, neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes. With advanced glycation end products (AGEs) interaction, RAGE mediates the effects of its other extracellular ligands. Further, RAGE bound HMGB1 indicated the roles of RAGE in cellular migration and intrusiveness (12). Studies in the recent past have confirmed that soluble forms of RAGE might stabilize inflammatory reflexes from RAGE ligands such as AGEs, S100 proteins and HMGB1 (13,14). So, it is another way of HMGB1 to play the role of a cytokine via activation of additional immune responses or inflammatory reactions. Damaged or necrotic cells, leading to inflammation, could also passively release the protein. Further, post-translational modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation and poly(ADP)-ribosylation are also responsible for direct HMGB1 action towards secretory pathway (10). All these considerations indicated that HMGB1 is a very important mediator of inflammatory response, with several mechanisms of action not yet completely elucidated. Some recent studies have also shown that release of hyperglycemia-induced HMGB1 leads to renal injury causing tubulointerstitial inflammation during DN (1517).

6. HMGB1 signaling and DN

The prime cellular receptor for HMGB1 is the RAGE that is the main mode of communication between advanced glycation end product (AGE)-modified proteins and the endothelium cells (18). Further, additional pathways viz. CDC42/Rac pathway and MAPK-NF-κB pathways are also activated by RAGE binding to HMGB1 (19). Collective activation of the above two pathways often leads to chemotaxis, cytokine activation and migration of immune cells. There are additional receptor(s) relevant to HMGB1 signaling. Consistent with this assumption, follow-up studies further characterized that toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) and 4, are involved in HMGB1 signaling (12) likely through Rac1/PI3K/CDC42 pathway and MyD88 dependent NF-κB activation pathways.

7. AGE and DN

The AGE is the result of a non-enzymatic reaction between reducing monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells so as to amplify inflammation reaction (20,21). Receptors for AGE (RAGE) when bound to AGEs, associate with reactive oxygen species generation support supplementary AGEs via the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase pathway (22).

The aldose reductase-mediated polyol pathway may directly form AGEs via 3-deoxyglucosone AGE intermediates. This reaction causes depletion of NADPH and glutathione, and the resultant oxidative stress indirectly increases formation of AGEs (21). AGEs can cause extensive cross-linking of proteins and its oxidation, leading to their deposition, as reported in diabetes and Alzheimers diseases (23). Collectively, these reports indicate that HMGB1s role in the mechanisms of inflammation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, DN and cancer, are very important although still poorly known. Therefore, it is very important to investigate such aspects to better understand these pathogenetic mechanisms and possibly identify the molecular pathways involved, with the aim to develop novel therapeutic strategies for these serious diseases.

8. Conclusions

It was concluded from above that diabetic nephropathy is a common outcome associated with diabetes and could prove fatal if not treated in time. Further, the HMGB1 is the key protein responsible for DN and could be exploited as an efficient target for novel therapeutics against DN.

References

  • 1.Juster-Switlyk K, Smith AG. Updates in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. F1000Res. 2016;5:738. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7898.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wong LP, Li NC, Kansal S, Lacson E, Jr, Maddux F, Kessler J, Curd S, Lester K, Herman M, Pulliam J. Urgent peritoneal dialysis starts for ESRD: Initial multicenter experiences in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:500–502. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Toplak H, Stauber R, Sourij H. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Guidelines, clinical reality and health economic aspects. Diabetologia. 2016;59:1148–1149. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3941-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu HZ, Cheng YL, Wang WN, Wu H, Zhang YY, Zang CS, Xu ZG. 12-Lipoxygenase inhibition on microalbuminuria in type-1 and type-2 diabetes is associated with changes of glomerular angiotensin II type 1 receptor related to insulin resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:E684. doi: 10.3390/ijms17050684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jones GRD, Lim EM. The National Kidney Foundation Guideline on estimation of the glomerular filtration rate. Clin Biochem Rev. 2003;24:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lakshmanan H, Raman J, Pandian A, Kuppamuthu K, Nanjian R, Sabaratam V, Naidu M. Aqueous extract of Senecio candicans DC induce liver and kidney damage in a sub-chronic oral toxicity study in Wistar rats. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;79:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cholongitas E, Ioannidou M, Goulis I, Chalevas P, Ntogramatzi F, Athanasiadou Z, Notopoulos A, Alevroudis M, Sinakos E, Akriviadis E. Comparison of creatinine and cystatin formulae with 51 chromium-Edta glomerular filtration rate in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:191–198. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor EH. Clinical Chemistry. Vol. 4. John Wiley and Sons; New York, NY: 1989. pp. 58–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen Q, Guan X, Zuo X, Wang J, Yin W. The role of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016;6:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Todorova J, Pasheva E. High mobility group B1 protein interacts with its receptor RAGE in tumor cells but not in normal tissues. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:214–218. doi: 10.3892/ol.2011.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nagai R, Jinno M, Ichihashi M, Koyama H, Yamamoto Y, Yonei Y. Advanced glycation end products and their receptors as risk factors for aging. Anti-Aging Med. 2012;9:108–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramasamy R, Yan SF, Schmidt AM. Receptor for AGE (RAGE): signaling mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1243:88–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06320.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sárkány Z, Ikonen T, Ferreira-da-Silva F, Saraiva M, Svergun D, Damas AM. Solution structure of the soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) J Biol Chem. 2011;286:37525–37534. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.223438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Per M, Humpert Djuric Z, Kopf S, Rudofsky G, Morcos M, Nawroth P, Bierhaus A. Soluble RAGE but not endogenous secretory RAGE is associated with albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2007;7:6–9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-6-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim J, Sohn E, Kim CS, Jo K, Kim JS. The role of high-mobility group box-1 protein in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Am J Nephrol. 2011;33:524–529. doi: 10.1159/000327992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin M, Yiu WH, Wu HJ, Chan LY, Leung JC, Au WS, Chan KW, Lai KN, Tang SC. Toll-like receptor 4 promotes tubular inflammation in diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:86–102. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010111210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Penfold SA, Coughlan MT, Patel SK, Srivastava PM, Sourris KC, Steer D, Webster DE, Thomas MC, MacIsaac RJ, Jerums G, et al. Circulating high-molecular-weight RAGE ligands activate pathways implicated in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2010;78:287–295. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hori O, Brett J, Slattery T, Cao R, Zhang J, Chen JX, Nagashima M, Lundh ER, Vijay S, Nitecki D, et al. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular binding site for amphoterin. Mediation of neurite outgrowth and co-expression of rage and amphoterin in the developing nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25752–25761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yang H, Wang H, Czura CJ, Tracey KJ. The cytokine activity of HMGB1. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78:1–8. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1104648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Münch G, Keis R, Wessels A, Riederer P, Bahner U, Heidland A, Niwa T, Lemke HD, Schinzel R. Determination of advanced glycation end products in serum by fluorescence spectroscopy and competitive ELISA. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997;35:669–677. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1997.35.9.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huebschmann AG, Regensteiner JG, Vlassara H, Reusch JE. Diabetes and advanced glycoxidation end products. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1420–1432. doi: 10.2337/dc05-2096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wautier MP, Chappey O, Corda S, Stern DM, Schmidt AM, Wautier JL. Activation of NADPH oxidase by AGE links oxidant stress to altered gene expression via RAGE. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;280:E685–E694. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.5.E685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gella A, Durany N. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease. Cell Adh Migr. 2009;3:88–93. doi: 10.4161/cam.3.1.7402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES