Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Sep 21;5(38):e00956-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00956-17

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Strains of a Newly Described Species, Sphingobacterium cellulitidis

Torsten Seemann a,b, Dieter M Bulach a,b, Glen Carter b, M John Albert c,✉
PMCID: PMC5609413  PMID: 28935734

ABSTRACT

The draft genome sequences of two strains of a newly described species, Sphingobacterium cellulitidis, have been determined. The type strain originated from cellulitis of a toe of a patient and the other strain from the environment. The sequences will provide the reference genomes of the new Sphingobacterium species.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Sphingobacterium comprises Gram-negative, nonfermenting, non-spore-forming aerobic bacilli. These bacteria are catalase and oxidase positive. They can be cultivated on blood agar and MacConkey agar, where they produce colonies with a yellow color (1). They are ubiquitous in nature, being found in soil, plant material, and water bodies. They are characterized by the presence of menaquinone as the major respiratory quinone, as well as sphingolipids and polar lipids (2). There are 43 species of Sphingobacterium, and few are associated with human infection, with the exception of S. spiritivorum and S. multivorum. These two species are occasionally isolated from bloodstream infections, respiratory infections, cellulitis, and end-stage kidney disease (3–8). Sphingobacterium strain R-53603 was isolated from cellulitis of the right big toe of a female patient in Kuwait, and according to 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, this strain is closely related to environmental strain R-53745 collected from an activated sludge isolate in Singapore. DNA-DNA hybridization and other analyses were used to provide evidence leading to the assignment of these strains to a new species, Sphingobacterium cellulitidis (9). Reported here are the annotated draft genome sequences for both R-53603 (the type strain for S. cellulitidis) and R-53745. Significantly, this is a third Sphingobacterium species associated with human disease.

Whole-genome sequencing of the strains was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument using Nextera XT library preparation and paired-end 151-bp chemistry. Sequence reads were de novo assembled using Unicycler version 0.4 (10), with default parameters, and annotated using Prokka version 1.12 (11), with default parameters.

The characteristics of genome assembly and annotation of strains R-53603 and R-53745 are as follows: sequencing depths, 94× and 106×; sizes, 4.61 Mb and 4.40 Mb; numbers of contigs (≥200 bp), 32 and 51; contig N50 values, 438 kbp and 225 kbp; G+C contents, 37.5% and 37.4%; numbers of coding sequences (CDSs), 4,011 and 3,771; and numbers of tRNAs, 45 and 45, respectively. No antibiotic resistance genes (http://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/) or virulence factor genes (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/) were detected in the genome sequence of either S. cellulitidis strain.

Accession number(s).

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers NOUX00000000 (strain R-53603) and NOUY00000000 (strain R-53745). The versions described in this paper are the first versions, NOUX01000000 and NOUY01000000, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Footnotes

Citation Seemann T, Bulach DM, Carter G, Albert MJ. 2017. Draft genome sequences of two strains of a newly described species, Sphingobacterium cellulitidis. Genome Announc 5:e00956-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00956-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Forbes B, Sahm D, Weissfeld A. 2007. Diagnostic microbiology, 12th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wauters G, Janssens M, De Baere T, Vaneechoutte M, Deschaght P. 2012. Isolates belonging to CDC group II-i belong predominantly to Sphingobacterium mizutaii Yabuuchi et al. 1983: emended descriptions of S. mizutaii and of the genus Sphingobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:2598–2601. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.037325-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barahona F, Slim J. 2015. Sphingobacterium multivorum: case report and literature review. New Microbes New Infect 7:33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marinella MA. 2002. Cellulitis and sepsis due to Sphingobacterium. JAMA 288:1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tronel H, Plesiat P, Ageron E, Grimont PA. 2003. Bacteremia caused by a novel species of Sphingobacterium. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:1242–1244. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2003.00801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kämpfer P, Engelhart S, Rolke M, Sennekamp J. 2005. Extrinsic allergic alveolitis (hypersensitivity pneumonitis) caused by Sphingobacterium spiritivorum from the water reservoir of a steam iron. J Clin Microbiol 43:4908–4910. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4908-4910.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gupta A, Logan J, Elhag N, Almond M. 2016. Sphingobacterium spiritivorum infection in a patient with end stage renal disease on haemodialysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 15:25. doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0141-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lambiase A, Rossano F, Del Pezzo M, Raia V, Sepe A, de Gregorio F, Catania MR. 2009. Sphingobacterium respiratory tract infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Res Notes 2:262. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huys G, Purohit P, Tan CH, Snauwaert C, De Vos P, Saffar HA, Al Obaid I, Busse HJ, Seemann T, Albert MJ. 2017. Sphingobacterium cellulitidis sp. nov., isolated from clinical and environmental sources. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1415–1421. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES