Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2017 Aug 28;8:1578. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01578

Community Structure of Lithotrophically-Driven Hydrothermal Microbial Mats from the Mariana Arc and Back-Arc

Kevin W Hager 1,, Heather Fullerton 1,, David A Butterfield 2, Craig L Moyer 1,*
PMCID: PMC5609546  PMID: 28970817

Abstract

The Mariana region exhibits a rich array of hydrothermal venting conditions in a complex geological setting, which provides a natural laboratory to study the influence of local environmental conditions on microbial community structure as well as large-scale patterns in microbial biogeography. We used high-throughput amplicon sequencing of the bacterial small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene from 22 microbial mats collected from four hydrothermally active locations along the Mariana Arc and back-arc to explore the structure of lithotrophically-based microbial mat communities. The vent effluent was classified as iron- or sulfur-rich corresponding with two distinct community types, dominated by either Zetaproteobacteria or Epsilonproteobacteria, respectively. The Zetaproteobacterial-based communities had the highest richness and diversity, which supports the hypothesis that Zetaproteobacteria function as ecosystem engineers creating a physical habitat within a chemical environment promoting enhanced microbial diversity. Gammaproteobacteria were also high in abundance within the iron-dominated mats and some likely contribute to primary production. In addition, we also compare sampling scale, showing that bulk sampling of microbial mats yields higher diversity than micro-scale sampling. We present a comprehensive analysis and offer new insights into the community structure and diversity of lithotrophically-driven microbial mats from a hydrothermal region associated with high microbial biodiversity. Our study indicates an important functional role of for the Zetaproteobacteria altering the mat habitat and enhancing community interactions and complexity.

Keywords: Mariana Arc and back-arc, hydrothermal vents, community structure, microbial mats, ecosystem engineers

Introduction

Recognizing and cataloging the microbial biodiversity at extant hydrothermal vents is critical to gain a better understanding of current and ancient ecosystem functions and how the taxa present play a role in global geochemical processes (Gilbert et al., 2011; Reed et al., 2014). The steep redox gradients and high concentration of reduced substrates [e.g., Fe(II), H2S, and H2] in hydrothermal vent habitats provide energetically favorable conditions that support luxuriant microbial mats with phylogenetically diverse lithoautotrophic microbes (Emerson and Moyer, 2010; Amend et al., 2011). This spectrum of geochemistry is thought to be similar to that of early Earth and as such, hydrothermal vents are a compelling system to study early life on Earth and may provide insights into other potentially habitable zones such as Saturn's moon, Enceladus (Martin et al., 2008; McKay et al., 2008). Early Earth may have been drastically modified by iron-oxidizing bacteria as they are thought to have been partially, if not fully, responsible for the global pattern of banded iron formations deposited during the Precambrian (Konhauser et al., 2002; Chan et al., 2016a). Iron is the second most abundant metal in Earth's crust (Kappler et al., 2015), and it represents a large and ancient energy source for iron-oxidizing bacteria (Planavsky et al., 2009). Therefore, hydrothermal vent systems allow for investigations into the fundamentals of microbial ecology and biogeography as well as planetary processes such as global carbon and mineral cycling (Nakagawa and Takai, 2008; Dick et al., 2013; Resing et al., 2015).

The hydrothermally active regions of the Mariana Arc and back-arc systems are formed by differential volcanic activity from the subduction and melting of the Pacific plate beneath the Philippine plate (Fryer, 1996). Relative to mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal systems, the geochemistry of the hydrothermal vent effluent (e.g., concentrations of reduced metals, H2, H2S, CO2, and NH4+) across the Mariana region is highly heterogeneous due to the wide range in magmatic volatile content and magma chemistry of the Island Arc and back-arc. Fluid chemistry may be dominated by magmatic CO2, as at NW Eifuku (Lupton et al., 2006, 2008), or by active volcanism and magmatic SO2, as at NW Rota-1 (Butterfield et al., 2011), or may be more rock-buffered as at Urashima and Snail sites on the back-arc (Nakamura et al., 2013; Ishibashi et al., 2015). Significant variation in fluid chemistry within a vent field on a single submarine volcano is not uncommon, due to sub-seafloor reaction between host rock and fluids enriched in magmatic gases (e.g., Champagne and Yellow Cone vents from NW Eifuku). This high variability in vent effluent geochemistry compounded over the expansive geographic area of the Mariana region harbors disparate habitats that offer the opportunity for niche differentiation, a wide range of metabolic potential, and diverse microbial communities (Davis and Moyer, 2008).

Hydrothermal vent microbial community structure in the Mariana region was shown to be extremely diverse and has been split into three groups dominated either by Zetaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, or putative heterotrophic phylotypes (Davis and Moyer, 2008). The Zetaproteobacteria are a more recently described class of iron-oxidizing bacteria (Emerson et al., 2007), and a complex picture of biogeography has begun to emerge as they are found globally in an array of iron-rich environments including hydrothermal vent microbial mats from the South Tonga Arc; Iwo-Jima, Japan; Tutum Bay, Papua New Guinea; and the Mid Atlantic Ridge (Forget et al., 2010; Meyer-Dombard et al., 2013; Hoshino et al., 2015; Scott et al., 2015). Zetaproteobacteria have also been detected in hydrothermal borehole fluids (Kato et al., 2009b), continental subsurface water (Emerson et al., 2015), near shore estuaries (McBeth et al., 2013), estuarine oxygen minimum zones (Field et al., 2016), and non-venting deep continental margins (Rubin-Blum et al., 2014). Recent studies hypothesize that Zetaproteobacteria are microbial ecosystem engineers because they have the genetic potential for the production of organic carbon and the capacity to shape the environment by producing iron oxyhydroxide minerals and exopolysaccharides, which in turn provide structure to the mats and can alter the local geochemistry, enhancing microbial diversity (Forget et al., 2010; Fleming et al., 2013; Meyer-Dombard et al., 2013; Jesser et al., 2015; Chan et al., 2016b). Due to the variability of the vent effluent composition, the Mariana region also has sulfur-rich hydrothermal habitats. Sulfur- and hydrogen-oxidizing Epsilonproteobacteria have been detected in microbial mats and hydrothermal fluids as the primary lithotrophic drivers at these locations (Davis and Moyer, 2008; Huber et al., 2010; Meyer and Huber, 2014).

In addition to the observed geographic-scale variation across vent habitats, community structures can be can be examined on a spatial scale of millimeters within individual microbial mats. Sampling at smaller spatial scales has received much attention in studies of soils and photosynthetic mats (Fike et al., 2008; Harris et al., 2013; Raynaud and Nunan, 2014; Cordero and Datta, 2016), but only recently has high-resolution sampling of deep-sea hydrothermal mats been highlighted (Breier et al., 2012; Teske et al., 2016). Unlike easily accessible photosynthetic mats, microbial mats in the deep sea are difficult to study on a fine scale due to the limitations of sample collection with remotely operated vehicles. Systematic, fine-scale sampling of iron mats from Lō'ihi Seamount, Hawai'i has revealed different abundances of functional genes and extracellular structures from visibly different mat morphologies (Fleming et al., 2013; Jesser et al., 2015; Fullerton et al., 2017) that occur in microbial mats that can be over a meter deep (Edwards et al., 2011) exhibiting millimeter scale redox gradients, especially at their surface (Glazer and Rouxel, 2009). Further, microscopy studies of iron-oxidizing bacteria reveal that cells are not evenly distributed in mats, but rather they develop into actively growing fronts (Chan et al., 2016b) that can oxidize iron at a rate of up to 52 μmole hr−1 and can accrete mat material at ~2.2 cm yr−1 (Emerson et al., 2017). These data confirm the importance of addressing spatial heterogeneity through fine-scale sampling of hydrothermal microbial mats.

The Mariana Arc and back-arc hydrothermal vent microbial communities have been described with high microbial biodiversity using small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene clone libraries and community fingerprinting analyses (Davis and Moyer, 2008). For this study, we used high-throughput, second generation SSU rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (Caporaso et al., 2012; Pedrós-Alió, 2012) in an effort to comprehensively investigate and better understand the community structure of microbial mats along the Mariana Arc and back-arc. We further expand on the importance of sampling scale by juxtaposing the microbial diversity of mats collected with a fine-scale sampling device (e.g., biomat sampler) to more commonly used scoop samplers. These results provide novel insights into patterns of biogeography, ecology, and microbial biodiversity of the lithotrophic drivers of these hydrothermal communities.

Methodology

Sample collection

Microbial mats were collected at the Mariana back-arc sites Snail (also known as the Fryer Site) and Urashima and at the Mariana Arc sites NW Eifuku and NW Rota-1 (Figure 1A) during R/V Roger Revelle cruise 1413 (11/29/2014–12/21/2014) with remotely operated vehicle Jason II. A total of 22 samples were collected with either the biomat syringe sampler (Breier et al., 2012; Figure 1F) or scoop sampler (Figure 1G, Table 1). Scoop samples were preserved in RNAlater (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at depth (LSc), or RNAlater was added after the scoop was brought to the surface (Sc). All mats collected were stored at −80°C upon processing until DNA extractions. Sample names consist of Jason II dive number (797–801) followed by biomat sampler cassette letter and individual syringe number(s) or the type of scoop and the scoop number (e.g., biomat sampler: 797B3 and scoop sampler: 797LSc1). Mats from three locations were collected with both biomat and scoop samplers to compare community structure and diversity in relation to sampling technique. Vent effluent was collected with the Hydrothermal Fluid and Particle Sampler (Butterfield et al., 2004) and analyzed on board for total hydrogen sulfide, pH, and dissolved hydrogen. Iron was measured by atomic absorption at Pacific Marine Environmental Lab in Seattle, WA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Bathymetric map of the Mariana region with black circles designating dive locations. Representative photos of mat collection sites: (B) Golden Horn chimney at Urashima; (C) Marker 104 at Snail Vents; (D) Champagne Vents; (E) Yellow Cone Mkr 146, and (F) Yellow Cone Marker 124 at NW Eifuku; (G) Iceberg and (H) Olde Iron Slides at NW Rota-1. Images (F,G) include the biomat syringe sampler and an RNAlater Scoop (LSc), respectively. Scale bars represent 10 cm. Map is courtesy of Susan Merle, NOAA EOI/OSU.

Table 1.

Sample location details and general descriptions of microbial mats.

Sample Vent field Site Latitude Longitude Depth (m) Description
797D156 Snail Mkr 108 12° 57.166′ N 143° 37.142′ E 2,850 Iron mat with black Mn outer surface
797D234 Snail Mkr 108 12° 57.166′ N 143° 37.142′ E 2,850 Iron mat with black Mn outer surface
797B12 Urashima Snap Snap 12° 55.333′ N 143° 38.950′ E 2,928 Flocculant iron mat
797B3 Urashima Snap Snap 12° 55.333′ N 143° 38.950′ E 2,928 Flocculant iron mat
797B56 Urashima Snap Snap 12° 55.333′ N 143° 38.950′ E 2,928 Flocculant iron mat
797LSc1 Urashima Snap Snap 12° 55.333′ N 143° 38.950′ E 2,928 Flocculant iron mat
797C34 Urashima Saipanda Horn 12° 55.333′ N 143° 38.950′ E 2,928 Flocculant iron mat
801Sc8 Urashima Golden Horn (base) 12° 55.340′ N 143° 38.957′ E 2,930 Flocculant iron mat
801X126 Urashima Golden Horn (base) 12° 55.343′ N 143° 38.953′ E 2,931 Flocculant iron mat
801X345 Urashima Golden Horn (middle) 12° 55.343′ N 143° 38.953′ E 2,928 Flocculant iron mat
801LSc4 Urashima Golden Horn (top) 12° 55.343′ N 143° 38.953′ E 2,922 Flocculant iron mat
798B123456 NW Eifuku Champagne 21° 29.244′ N 144° 2.485′ E 1,606 Creamy white sulfur mat at vent orifice
798LSc3 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 124) 21° 29.274′ N 144° 2.519′ E 1,584 Flocculant iron mat
798C346 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 146) 21° 29.265′ N 144° 2.519′ E 1,579 Flocculant iron mat
798LSc1 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 146) 21° 29.265′ N 144° 2.519′ E 1,579 Flocculant iron mat
799B156 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 146) 21° 29.264′ N 144° 2.524′ E 1,581 Flocculant iron mat
799D124 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 146) 21° 29.264′ N 144° 2.524′ E 1,580 Flocculant iron mat
799D3 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 146) 21° 29.264′ N 144° 2.524′ E 1,581 Flocculant iron mat
799D56 NW Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr 146) 21° 29.264′ N 144° 2.524′ E 1,581 Flocculant iron mat
800LSc2 NW Rota-1 Iceberg 14° 36.061′ N 144° 46.577′ E 527 Thin white mat on volcanic sand
800B12456 NW Rota-1 Olde Iron Slides 14° 36.056′ N 144° 46.656′ E 567 Iron tufts adjacent to white filamentous mat
800Sc8 NW Rota-1 Olde Iron Slides 14° 36.056′ N 144° 46.656′ E 567 Iron tufts mixed with white filamentous mat

DNA extractions, amplification, and sequencing

For each sample, three to five extractions using ~0.5 g of mat material for each extraction were done using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) after removal of excess fluid (sea water or RNAlater). The manufacture's protocol was followed with the following modifications: 250 μl 0.5 M sodium citrate pH 5.8 was added in place of 250 μl of the sodium phosphate buffer. Lysis was performed with two rounds of bead beating for 45 s at a setting of 5.5 using the FastPrep instrument (MP Biomedicals) with samples being placed on ice between runs. DNA was eluted in 100 μl 1.0 mM Tris pH 8.0. Genomic DNA was quantified with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer using the dsDNA high sensitivity kit (ThermoFisher Scientific).

The V3-V4 variable regions of the SSU rRNA gene were amplified via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from all mat samples using bacterial primers 340F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGC WGCAG-3′) and 784R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) according to Klindworth et al. (2012) with overhang sequences on the 5′ ends (not shown) compatible with Illumina adapters. Triplicate PCRs were performed in 25 μl reactions with 2X KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA), 0.1 mM forward/reverse primers, and 25 ng template DNA. The following PCR conditions were used: 3 min at 95°C; 25 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C; and a final elongation of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were pooled and purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Illumina Nextera XT (Illumina Inc.) adapters with unique index combinations were added to each sample in a 50 μl PCR using 2X KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix with the following conditions: 3 min at 95°C; 8 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C; and a final elongation of 5 min at 72°C. Products were again purified with Agencourt AMPure XP beads. Libraries were then quantified with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer and size validated with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq as per manufacturer's protocol generating 2 × 300 bp paired-end reads. Sequence data are available through the NCBI Sequence Read Archive study number SRP092903 (BioProject: PRJNA352433).

Sequence processing

Reads in which 75% of the base calls had a QScores below 30 were discarded from further analysis using FASTQ Quality Filter of the FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). Remaining sequences were processed using the mothur software package as previously described (Schloss et al., 2009; Kozich et al., 2013). Briefly, after forming contigs from the paired-end reads, PCR primers were trimmed off and any sequence with a homopolymer >8 bases or any sequences with ambiguous base calls were eliminated from further processing. Reads were pre-cluster with the “pre.cluster” command with a threshold of four-nucleotide differences. Chimeras were removed with UCHIME (Edgar et al., 2011). Sequences were binned into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on 97% sequence similarity using “cluster.split”, and OTUs were classified to the genus level using RDP training set v.9 (Wang et al., 2007; Cole et al., 2013).

The program ZetaHunter (https://github.com/mooreryan/ZetaHunter) assigns sequences classified as Zetaproteobacteria to previously defined Zetaproteobacterial OTUs (zOTUs) (Schloss et al., 2009; McAllister et al., 2011; Quast et al., 2012). The most abundant read from each OTU classified as Zetaproteobacteria was assessed using ZetaHunter to further classify these OTUs for comparison to previous studies.

Diversity and statistical analyses

OTU bins at the level of 97% sequence similarity as determined with mothur were used in all downstream analyses. We subsampled to the number of reads in the least sequenced sample (54,803 contigs) for calculation of diversity indices with the “summary.single” command. A distance matrix was calculated (Yue and Clayton, 2005) and a community structure dendrogram was constructed in BioNumerics v.7.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) including calculation of cophenetic correlations. Rarefaction curves were calculated using mothur based on the number of observed OTUs per sample and 1,000 iterations. Abundant OTUs were determined by selecting OTUs with >1% of the total reads/sample in at least one sample. The vegan and gplots packages in R were used (R Core Team, 2014; Oksanen et al., 2015; Warnes et al., 2015) to visualize abundant OTUs belonging to the Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacteria with double hierarchical clustering based off Bray-Curtis dissimilatory matrices. Metastats is an application that uses count data from multiple populations to determine which OTUs are significantly different between populations (White et al., 2009). Implemented through mothur, a Metastats analysis was used to determine which of these OTUs had a significantly different abundance (p < 0.05) between groups established by clustering hierarchy. To link community structure to select environmental factors we performed a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) with the vegan package in R using proportions of reads for the abundant Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacterial OTUs and environmental concentrations for Fe, H2S, and H2 (Ter Braak, 1986). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for statistical significance (p < 0.05) of the CCA.

Results

Site descriptions

Microbial mats were collected from four active hydrothermal fields from both the Mariana Arc and back-arc. Sample collection locations and images depicting representative microbial mats are shown in Figure 1, and the general features of mats collected are described in Table 1. Snail, an on-axis back-arc site, was characterized by thick orange mats with a black surface likely composed of manganese (Figure 1C). Urashima is an off-axis, back-arc field ~5 km to the southeast of Snail characterized by tall iron-sulfide chimney structures layered with flocculent orange microbial mats. Golden Horn Chimney was the largest of these structures reaching 13 m high (Figure 1B). The arc seamount NW Eifuku included creamy, white mats near liquid CO2 bubbling at Champagne Vent (Figure 1D) as well as yellow to orange mats located at Yellow Cone Markers 146 and 124 (Figures 1E,F). Yellow Cone had small, chimney-like structures formed from flocculent mat material, but no large mineralized chimneys such as Golden Horn were observed. The seamount NW Rota-1 was primarily dominated by thin white microbial mats comparable to those collected at Iceberg (Figure 1G); however, Olde Iron Slides had thin tufts of yellow-orange mat as well (Figure 1H). The fluids collected adjacent to microbial mats from Champagne and Iceberg are referred to as sulfur-dominated; they had H2S to Fe molar ratio values of >4,000x with respect to fluids collected amidst the flocculent, yellow to orange microbial mats, which were high in Fe and considered iron-dominated (Table 2). Fluids from Champagne also had a relatively high concentration of H2 compared to all other locations in this study. No fluid for geochemical analyses were collected at Olde Iron Slides.

Table 2.

Geochemical profiles for mat collection sites.

Vent field Site Tmax (°C) pH Fe (μM) H2S (μM) H2 (μM)
Snail Mkr 108 36.0 6.7 19.3 <0.4 <0.01
Urashima Saipanda Horn/Snap Snap 18.7 6.5 48.5 <0.4 0.01
Urashima Golden Horn (base) 10.0 6.6 54.0 <0.4 0.03
Urashima Golden Horn (middle) 10.3 6.5 67.0 <0.4 0.02
Urashima Golden Horn (top) 15.9 6.3 66.1 0.4 0.01
Urashima Mid-water background 2.0 7.5 15.3 <0.4 0.02
NW-Eifuku Champagne (Mkr144) 63.0 4.9 14.7 2758.1 0.70
NW-Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr124) 22.5 5.6 221.3 0.8 <0.01
NW-Eifuku Yellow Cone (Mkr146) 30.5 5.7 96.7 4.0 0.02
NW-Eifuku Eifuku background plume 2.0 7.5 0.1 0.4 <0.01
NW Rota-1 Menagerie (near Iceberg) 19.1 5.4 <0.1 816.0 <0.01

Sequencing and community structure

A total of 22 samples of microbial mats were collected and analyzed including 20 from locations with iron-dominated fluids including Snail, Urashima, NW Eifuku, and NW Rota-1. One mat sample was collected from Champagne and Iceberg respectively, where fluids were sulfur-dominated. In total 17,515,651 raw, paired-end sequences with an average length of 420 bp covering the V3-V4 regions of the SSU rRNA gene were generated. After quality filtering with mothur, a total of 6,770,752 contigs remained. At a 97% similarity cutoff 62,520 OTUs were generated of which 162 were abundant with >1% of the total reads in at least one sample. Of these OTUs, were 30 cosmopolitan taxa found across all iron-dominated mats.

As seen in Figure 2, at the phylum level, all samples had a large abundance of the Proteobacteria with a majority of these reads belonging to the classes Zetaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria. Unclassified bacteria also made up a large portion of all communities. Both mats from Snail (797D156 and 797D234) contained >50% unclassified bacteria whereas the average and standard deviation for all other samples was 18.8 ± 9.5%. Other phyla found in notable abundance include Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, and Planctomycetes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

OTU-based dendrogram with cophenetic correlation values at nodes and a scale bar representing percent similarity. Stacked bar graphs of community structure including Proteobacteria at the class level and other abundant phyla for 22 microbial mats from the Mariana Arc and back-arc.

The mat communities from iron-dominated fluids clustered together with the exclusion of the two mat communities from sulfur-dominated fluids (Figure 2). These two sulfur-dominated communities also had low similarity to each other as determined by the Yue-Clayton similarity measure and <25% of other taxa than the identified Epsilonproteobacteria, respectively, thereby comprising relative simple community structures. Cluster analysis revealed mixed clustering hierarchy among vent fields (Figure 2). However, when only comparing the 69 abundant Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacterial OTUs, the iron-rich mats formed three distinct clusters. One consisted of all the mats from NW Eifuku, and the other two were composed of Snail/Urashima mats and NW Rota-1/Urashima communities (Figure 3). A Metastats analysis revealed that 33 of these OTUs had a significant difference (p < 0.05) in abundance among the three groups (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Heatmap of Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-Proteobacterial OTUs with a maximum abundance >1% of reads in at least one sample. OTU number, class, family, and genus are displayed where sequences are classifiable. The zOTU classification is provided for the Zetaproteobacteria. Square root transformed values of the percentage of total reads per sample are plotted. Three groupings of iron-dominated microbial mat communities are present: an Urashima/Snail group (Urash/Snail), an Urashima/NW Rota-1 group (Urash/Rota), and a NW Eifuku group (Eifuku) are indicated with light, medium, and dark orange shading, respectively. Filled circles in the three columns left of the heatmap indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) in OTU abundance with respect to pairwise comparisons between the three groups of iron-dominated mats using Metastats.

Zetaproteobacterial phylotypes were detected in all flocculent, orange communities associated with iron-dominated fluids ranging from 4.1 to 44.3% (average ± standard deviation = 20.0 ± 10.9%) of the community composition. All Zetaproteobacterial OTUs were classified by RDP as the same genus, Mariprofundus, and the program ZetaHunter allowed for finer-scale OTU classification. All but two of the abundant Zetaproteobacterial OTUs (New zOTU 1 and 2) fit into previously characterized zOTUs. The two most abundant zOTUs (1 and 8) were found in all of the iron mat communities examined. Other zOTUs were endemic to one location; e.g., zOTU 20 was restricted to only Snail (Figure 3). Although detected (data not shown), no abundant OTUs were classified as zOTU 2 or 11. The two sulfur-dominated communities from Champagne and Iceberg had <0.06% of the reads classified as Zetaproteobacteria.

Epsilonproteobacteria were detected in every mat community, and the two sulfur-dominated microbial mats from Champagne and Iceberg had the highest percent of reads belonging to Epsilonproteobacteria at >77% (Figure 2). The Champagne mat was composed primarily of the genera Thioreductor and Lebetimonas (Figure 3). A single Thioreductor OTU represented nearly 53% of the total reads from the Champagne mat (Figure 3). The Iceberg microbial community was composed predominantly of the genera Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum with 26% of the total reads assigned to a single Sulfurovum OTU (Figure 3). Epsilonproteobacteria were well represented in iron-dominated mats as well, where they comprised 0.4–28.5% (average ± standard deviation = 13.9 ± 9.3%) of the reads (Figure 2). These abundant Epsilonproteobacterial OTUs present were also of the genera Sulfurovum and Sulfurimonas (Figure 3).

Gammaproteobacteria made up a large fraction of the community in iron-dominated mats as well. The Gammaproteobacteria range from 5.5 to 42.7% (average ± standard deviation = 17.4 ± 9.2%) of the reads in iron-dominated microbial mats, but they were found in low abundance (≤2.1%) in the sulfur-dominated mats (Figure 2). Of the 25 abundant Gammaproteobacterial OTUs, six belonged to the order Methylococcales and 18 could not be classified past the class level. BLAST searches of these unclassified Gammaproteobacteria indicated close relation to other environmental samples from marine hydrothermal environments (Supplemental Table 1).

ANOVA on the CCA with the abundant Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacterial OTUs and environmental parameters pertaining to inorganic electron donors (Fe, H2S, and H2) was significant (p = 0.005); 36.1% of the total variability in community structure was captured by CCA1 and CCA2 (Figure 4). When tested, the environmental parameters of temperature and pH were not found to be significant (data not shown). All locations with iron-dominated fluids formed a tight grouping overlapping with the Zetaproteobacterial OTUs and all but two of the Gammaproteobacterial OTUs. The Sulfurovum/Sulfurimonas OTUs formed a diffuse group including the two remaining Gammaproteobacterial OTUs. Champagne and the four abundant Thioreductor/Lebetimonas OTUs constituted a distinct third cluster.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

CCA triplot of community structure in relation to selected environmental variables for microbial mats from hydrothermal vents along the Mariana Arc and back-arc. Colored triangles represent abundant OTUs of the classes Zetaproteobacteria (n = 22) and Gammaproteobacteria (n = 25) and the genera Sulfurovum/Sulfurimonas (n = 18) and Thioreductor/Lebetimonas (inverted triangles, n = 4) of the Epsilonproteobacteria. Coordinates of mat collection sites are indicated with black circles. Percent of total variability explained by each axis is in parentheses on the axis label. The model is significant at p < 0.005.

Diversity estimates

Calculation of alpha diversity metrics based on OTUs defined at 97% sequence similarity allow for comparisons among samples (Table 3). An average Good's coverage of 0.98 indicated sufficient sequencing depth. The range and average values for Chao1 richness estimator, non-parametric Shannon diversity, and inverse Simpson diversity metrics, respectively, were 1,200–8,220 (average ± standard deviation = 4,646 ± 1,673), 2.1–6.3 (average ± standard deviation = 5.0 ± 1.0), 3.3–145.4 (average ± standard deviation = 50.0 ± 40.0) as seen in Table 3. The iron-dominated mats all had greater richness, diversity, and observed number of OTUs when compared to the two sulfur-dominated mats.

Table 3.

Sequencing information and diversity metrics.

Sample Number of sequences Observed OTUs Good's coverage Chao-1 richness Shannon diversity* Inverse Simpson diversity Shannon evenness
797D156 307,131 3,524 0.97 6,208 6.3 145.4 0.76
797D234 176,609 3,409 0.97 5,922 6.3 140.6 0.76
797B12 206,039 1,814 0.98 3,249 4.7 28.7 0.62
797B3 366,647 1,500 0.99 3,182 4.0 13.8 0.54
797B56 210,604 2,252 0.98 3,938 5.2 42.0 0.67
797LSc1 582,358 2,644 0.98 5,028 5.2 34.8 0.65
797C34 94,770 2,209 0.98 3,585 5.2 35.1 0.67
801Sc8 125,894 1,915 0.98 3,725 4.5 26.1 0.59
801X126 54,806 2,545 0.98 4,298 4.6 17.1 0.58
801X345 63,308 2,905 0.97 8,220 4.7 17.8 0.58
801LSc4 114,835 1,404 0.99 3,060 3.8 17.1 0.51
798B123456 233,627 504 0.99 1,200 2.1 3.3 0.34
798LSc3 420,287 2,656 0.97 5,991 5.6 80.9 0.70
798C346 379,737 1,756 0.98 3,819 4.2 16.1 0.55
798LSc1 334,615 2,255 0.98 4,840 5.4 62.7 0.69
799B156 348,417 3,091 0.97 5,626 6.0 92.5 0.73
799D124 271,779 1,712 0.98 3,316 4.9 43.6 0.65
799D3 1,123,677 2,929 0.97 5,918 5.6 61.9 0.70
799D56 92,953 2,606 0.98 4,095 5.7 76.5 0.71
800LSc2 350,113 1,495 0.99 3,028 3.4 8.7 0.46
800B12456 361,680 3,056 0.97 5,813 5.3 33.1 0.64
800Sc8 374,997 4,466 0.96 8,155 6.3 101.9 0.74

All metrics calculated with subsampling to the lowest sequencing effort, 54,806 sequences.

*

Non-parametric.

Mat communities collected using scoops showed higher diversity than associated with biomat samples. At three locations both scoops and biomat samples were taken in the same place: 797LSc1 corresponds with 797B12 and 797B56, 798LSc1 corresponds with 798C346, and 800Sc8 corresponds with 800B12456. All the scoop communities had higher values for observed OTUs, Chao1 richness, and non-parametric Shannon diversity than their corresponding biomat communities with the exception that 797B56 had the same value for the non-parametric Shannon metric as 797LSc1 (Table 3). Rarefaction analysis also revealed higher richness in the mats collected with scoops compared to the corresponding biomat samples in all cases (Supplemental Figure 1).

Discussion

Community structure comparisons

Two distinct community types were identified based on the prevalent taxa. The first of these are the Zetaproteobacterial-dominated communities that were present only in association with the iron-dominated vent effluent. The second community type lacked Zetaproteobacteria; however, they had high levels of Epsilonproteobacteria and were found only in association with the sulfur-dominated fluids. These sulfur-dominated communities were present only at the Mariana Arc sites Champagne, NW Eifuku and Iceberg, NW Rota-1. Both community types contain an abundance of bacteria related to known lithoautotrophs to drive community primary production, and no mats were composed primarily of putative heterotrophic taxa as seen previously (Davis and Moyer, 2008).

The majority of the microbial mats we examined were of the Zetaproteobacteria-dominated community type and exhibited a high level of variability among the remaining community members (Figure 2). These Zetaproteobacterial-dominated mats were collected from all four dive locations (Table 1), and their respective community structure does not appear to correlate with location when all taxa are included (Figure 2). Only 18.5% of the abundant OTUs were found across all iron-dominated mats, which can lend explanation to the low Yue-Clayton similarities and high beta diversity in community structure observed between mat communities (Figure 2).

Biogeographic patterns emerged only when the variation of less abundant classes and the unclassified OTUs were removed from cluster analysis. The Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacteria, often the lithotrophic drivers of hydrothermal microbial mats, were found in high abundance in the iron mats here, and are likely the most ecologically significant members in these communities (Figure 2). With only the abundant OTUs belonging to the Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacteria, the Zetaproteobacterial-dominated mats of NW Eifuku all clustered together in one group (Figure 3). The two other groups are composed of communities from Snail, Urashima, and NW Rota-1, which are all relatively close to one another whereas NW Eifuku is hundreds of km north of these three vent fields (Figure 1A). These data support previous research showing community structure variability corresponding with vent location (Opatkiewicz et al., 2009; Huber et al., 2010; Makita et al., 2016). Although there were OTUs with significantly different abundances among all three groups of iron-dominated mats as determined via Metastats (Figure 3), there were no genera unique to one grouping, which suggests that a common ecosystem function is shared among the abundant community members of the Zeta-, Epsilon-, and Gamma-proteobacterial OTUs in all iron-dominated mats of the Mariana Arc and back-arc. This indicates that local fluid geochemistry (e.g., sulfur- vs. iron-dominated) rather than large-scale geography is more influential in determining the bacterial community composition and function, although there are observable patterns in biogeography based on differential OTU abundance among sites.

Zetaproteobacteria

All characterized Zetaproteobacteria strains are obligate iron-oxidizing lithoautotrophs belonging to the genus Mariprofundus (Emerson et al., 2007; McBeth et al., 2011; Makita et al., 2017). Members of this genus have been previously detected in flocculent mats from the back-arc Snail and Urashima sites and from NW Eifuku (Davis and Moyer, 2008; Kato et al., 2009a; Makita et al., 2016); in addition to these locations, we have now identified Zetaproteobacteria at NW Rota-1 (Olde Iron Slides). After years of documented eruptions from 2004 to 2010 (Schnur et al., 2017), it is possible the hydrothermal fluids are undergoing a transition from sulfur- to iron-dominated effluent at this location as hypothesized by Butterfield et al. (1997). This geochemical succession is likely mirrored by the change in community structure that we are observing here as Zetaproteobacteria colonize a previously Epsilonproteobacteria-dominated vent field. We hypothesize a more recent transition from high sulfur to iron conditions might also explain why the orange mats at Olde Iron Slides were thinner and patchier in comparison to those found at Snail, Urashima, and Yellow Cone (Figure 1).

Because all Zetaproteobacteria isolates belong to the same genus, RDP classifies each Zetaproteobacterial sequence as identical; however, this underrepresents the actual diversity of this class. To further resolve the taxonomic diversity of the Zetaproteobacteria, McAllister et al. (2011) focused on their biogeography throughout the Pacific Ocean and found zOTUs 1 and 2 to be globally distributed, or cosmopolitan. In our study, zOTU 1 was found in relatively high abundance in all iron-dominated mats (Figure 3); however, zOTU 2 does not appear to be ecologically relevant or play a large role in ecosystem function, though it was detected throughout at low levels. Single cell amplified genomes from Lō'ihi Seamount show greater genetic diversity in zOTU 1 than zOTU 2 (Field et al., 2015). This higher genetic diversity may result in more phenotypic plasticity in zOTU 1, providing an advantage in the Mariana hydrothermal systems, where vent habitats are more heterogeneous (in terms of temperature and chemical composition) than locations such as Lō'ihi Seamount, where zOTU 2 is more abundant (McAllister et al., 2011; Field et al., 2015; Fullerton et al., 2017). The presence of zOTUs 3 and 4 in the Mariana raises their status to cosmopolitan across the Pacific. The higher depth of sequencing obtained here is probably responsible for their detection rather than a recent colonization event (although these are not mutually exclusive). The type strains Mariprofundus ferrooxidans and Mariprofundus micogutta belong to zOTUs 11 and 18, respectively. Though detected, these zOTUs were not found to be abundant in any mat communities investigated (Figure 3). Therefore, the present type strains are likely poor representatives of the most ecologically important and ubiquitously distributed zOTUs in the Mariana Arc and back-arc microbial mat communities.

The diversity of the Zetaproteobacteria has been under investigation due to their prominence and ecological importance in iron-rich hydrothermal habitats. Evidence suggests that Zetaproteobacteria not only act as primary producers (with respect to carbon cycling), but also produce an extensive physical environment that would otherwise not exist, thereby providing a habitat for diverse microbial communities. In a comparison between the two community types, all the Zetaproteobacterial-dominated mats had higher microbial diversity than the Epsilonproteobacteria-dominated community types (Table 3). This increased biodiversity is potentially due to the Fe-oxyhydroxides produced by the Zetaproteobacteria. These extracellular structures (e.g., stalks and sheaths) are well-documented from both isolates and naturally occurring microbial mats (Fleming et al., 2013; Bennett et al., 2014; Chan et al., 2016b; Makita et al., 2016). This high surface-area architecture can be colonized by an array of secondary consumers (e.g., Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Gammaproteobacteria, and Planctomycetes) that were also found to be present (Figure 2).

Epsilonproteobacteria

The Epsilonproteobacteria have broad metabolic capabilities, at hydrothermal vents they are typically represented by lithoautotrophic isolates energetically using reduced sulfur compounds and/or H2, they are motile and capable of quorum-sensing (Takai et al., 2005a; Campbell et al., 2006; Pérez-Rodríguez et al., 2015; Waite et al., 2017). Epsilonproteobacteria were detected in all samples; however, there are two distinct types of Epsilonproteobacterial communities containing OTUs either from the genera Thioreductor and Lebetimonas or Sulfurovum and Sulfurimonas. The sulfur-rich fluids at Champagne Vent were also high in H2 and supported a Thioreductor/Lebetimonas-dominated microbial mat. This was the only mat community composed of a high percentage of Thioreductor (Figure 3), which is represented by the type strain Thioreductor micantisoli (Nakagawa et al., 2005a). Cultured representatives in this genus are mesophilic, strictly anaerobic, and utilize H2 as their electron donor and S0 or NO3- as electron acceptors (Nakagawa et al., 2005b). Champagne Vent was also the only mat community that contained a high percentage of reads classified as Lebetimonas (Figure 3). The type strain for this group is Lebetimonas acidophila, also a strictly anaerobic H2-oxidizer and S0-reducer (Takai et al., 2005b). Previous work found both Thioreductor and Lebetimonas sequences in hydrothermal fluids sampled from NW Eifuku and NW Rota-1 as well as other Mariana Arc and back-arc vent fields (Huber et al., 2010; Meyer and Huber, 2014). These two genera appear to be highly prevalent in fluids, but as shown here are often rare in microbial mats as abundances of Thioreductor/Lebetimonas OTUs were <0.05% in all mats other than at Champagne Vent. This is likely due to their metabolic requirement for H2, which strongly correlates with the concentration of H2 (Figure 4). The low diversity and evenness in the Champagne Vent mat (Table 3) was due to the dominance of four putative H2-oxidizing OTUs accounting for 71.5% of the total reads. This indicates that H2 was likely the primary energy source for this microbial mat community.

Epsilonproteobacteria found in the diffuse-flow, sulfur-dominated mat at Iceberg Vent contained abundant OTUs identified as Sulfurimonas and Sulfurovum. Type strain Sulfurimonas autotrophica is a strict aerobe oxidizing H2S, S0, and S2O32- (Inagaki et al., 2004). Sulfurovum lithotrophicum also oxidizes S0 and S2O32- aerobically or anaerobically with NO3- as a terminal electron acceptor (Inagaki et al., 2003). We also detected a high abundance of Sulfurovum and Sulfurimonas OTUs in Zetaproteobacterial-dominated mats in addition to iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria. Despite the low concentrations of H2S in iron-dominated mats, the Epsilonproteobacteria likely play an important role in biogeochemical cycling of sulfur and carbon in iron mats, and their ecological importance should not be overlooked.

Gammaproteobacteria

The Gammaproteobacteria were also present in high abundance in mats with iron-dominated vent fluids, but the predicted metabolic potential is difficult to determine for the majority of them due to lack of classification beyond the class level. Six abundant Gammaproteobacterial OTUs classified as Methylococcaceae most likely obtain energy and carbon from methane (Hanson and Hanson, 1996; Gulledge et al., 2001). Methanotrophic Gammaproteobacteria in the order Methylococcaceae have been detected on the Mariana back-arc and other hydrothermal systems previously (Brazelton et al., 2006; Kato et al., 2009a). The other classified OTU belongs to the heterotrophic genus Thalassomonas (Macián et al., 2001). The remaining unclassified Gammaproteobacterial OTUs are likely common at marine hydrothermal habitats as indicated by high similarity to environmental sequences obtained from hydrothermal vents (Supplemental Table 1). When these same OTUs are compared to isolated strains the top representatives are heterotrophic or have sulfur-oxidizing metabolisms (Supplemental Table 1).

Globally, vent systems are rich in chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria including free-living and invertebrate endosymbiont taxa (Wirsen et al., 1998; Reed et al., 2014). Known sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria were present in low abundances in the mats in this study; e.g., six Thiomicrospira OTUs were detected, but the most abundant of these was only 0.18% of the total reads in sample 797B3 from Urashima. Recently, it has been shown that some Thiomicrospira spp. are also capable of switching between iron and sulfur oxidation (Barco et al., 2017). This metabolic switching could potentially cause some of the Gammaproteobacteria OTUs to more tightly cluster with those representing Zetaproteobacteria (Figure 4). Still, we hypothesize the abundant unclassified Gammaproteobacterial OTUs are predominantly heterotrophic (i.e., secondary consumers) in these Mariana, Zetaproteobacterial-dominated mats due to ecosystem engineering. The Gammaproteobacterial OTUs generally do not share a similar distribution pattern with the Sulfurovum/Sulfurimonas or Thioreductor/Lebetimonas OTUs, which suggests they do not have an energetic dependence on H2S or H2, respectively; however, there were two Gammaproteobacterial OTUs (055 and 153) that did share a similar distribution pattern with the Sulfurovum/Sulfurimonas, indicating that they may also share a potential energetic dependence on H2S (Figure 4). Making assumptions about the role of the unclassified Gammaproteobacteria in these habitats, however, must be done with caution because of the wide array of energy yielding metabolisms utilized by this phylogenetically diverse class (Williams et al., 2010).

Sampling scale

In addition to a large geographic scale, we also compared communities of fine-scale biomat samples and bulk scoop samples taken from the same microbial mat on three occasions. Rarefaction analysis showed higher OTU richness in the scoop sample than in the corresponding biomat sample from all three mat communities (Supplemental Figure 1). Observation of the high abundance OTUs in these sample pairings revealed different OTU enrichments based on sample type (Supplemental Figure 2). The scoop and biomat pairing from NW Rota-1, Olde Iron Slides (800Sc8 and 800B12456) is a clear example where targeted, fine-scale sampling had a significant impact on the measured microbial diversity and community structure. The biomat sampler specifically targeted thin, orange tufts on the surface of the mat, and the scoop sampler was less selective and collected underlying sediment as well as the orange and white microbial mats. Correspondingly, the biomat sample had over twice as many Zetaproteobacterial reads (Figure 2) and was enriched in zOTUs 1 and 8 (Supplemental Figure 2). The higher diversity and richness exhibited in scoops (Table 3, Supplemental Figure 1) from the other two microbial mats (Snap-Snap, Urashima and Yellow Cone, NW Eifuku) is likely a result of sampling multiple microhabitats within these mats, e.g., oxygenated surface layers and microaerophilic to anoxic zones deeper in the architecture of the mat (Chan et al., 2016b). These data are similar to that of more accessible systems such as in photosynthetic microbial mats, where depth profiles have shown considerable changes in community structure at the millimeter scale (Harris et al., 2013). Sampling scale affected estimated bacterial diversity and should be considered in future assessments of hydrothermal microbial mat communities.

Conclusions

This study offers insights into the community structure and biodiversity of lithotrophically-driven bacterial mat communities from iron- and sulfur-rich hydrothermal venting along the Mariana Arc and back-arc. Although local geochemistry (e.g., ratio of Fe/H2S and availability of H2) was the primary driver that correlated with community structure, geographic patterns in OTU abundance were also apparent, especially in the iron-dominated systems. Our study indicates an important functional role of Zetaproteobacteria at all sites with iron-dominated vent effluent and Epsilonproteobacteria at sites with sulfur-dominated fluids. Gammaproteobacteria were also high in abundance within the iron-dominated mats and likely had a heterotrophic role as secondary consumers, though some show the potential to grow lithotrophically as well. Higher bacterial diversity was observed in Zetaproteobacterial-dominated mats, which supports the hypothesis that Zetaproteobacteria function as ecosystem engineers altering the mat habitat and enhancing community interactions and complexity. In addition, sampling technique is an important consideration when attempting to assess the spatial heterogeneity associated with hydrothermal microbial mat communities. The high diversity observed among and within microbial communities encourages further research into the ecology, metabolic potential, and biodiversity of microbial mats fueled by Mariana Arc and back-arc submarine volcanism.

Author contributions

This work was designed and samples were collected by KH, HF, and CM. Corresponding geochemical assays were designed and conducted by DB. KH conducted the molecular analyses and amplicon sequencing. KH, HF, and CM contributed to the bioinformatics. KH wrote the manuscript. HF, DB, and CM substantially contributed to the data interpretation, drafting and revising of the manuscript. KH, HF, DB, and CM are all responsible for all aspects of this work and approve the final version to be published.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We wholeheartedly thank the ROV Jason II operations team for their assistance with sample collection during the “Ironman” cruise (November 29th to December 21st, 2014) to the Mariana Submarine Ring of Fire despite challenging weather and nearly unsurmountable technical difficulties. We also thank the captain and crew of the R/V Roger Revelle. We acknowledge and thank Kevin Roe and Ben Larson for their contribution to the chemical analysis of hydrothermal vent fluids. This is JISAO contribution #2017-07 and PMEL contribution #46240.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was funded in part by Western Washington University's Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, by the Biology Alumni Student Research Fellowship, the Fouts Foundation for the Enhancement of Student Research Experiences, and by the National Science Foundation, award OCE 1155756 (to CM). Additional funding was provided by the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) under NOAA Cooperative Agreement NA10OAR4320148 (to DB).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01578/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Amend J. P., McCollom T. M., Hentscher M., Bach W. (2011). Catabolic and anabolic energy for chemolithoautotrophs in deep-sea hydrothermal systems hosted in different rock types. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5736–5748. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barco R. A., Hoffman C. L., Ramirez G. A., Toner B. M., Edwards K. J., Sylvan J. B. (2017). In-situ incubation of iron-sulfur mineral reveals a diverse chemolithoautotrophic community and a new biogeochemical role for Thiomicrospira. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 1322–1337. 10.1111/1462-2920.13666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett S. A., Toner B. M., Barco R., Edwards K. J. (2014). Carbon adsorption onto Fe oxyhydroxide stalks produced by a lithotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria. Geobiology 12, 146–156. 10.1111/gbi.12074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brazelton W. J., Schrenk M. O., Kelley D. S., Baross J. A. (2006). Methane-and sulfur-metabolizing microbial communities dominate the Lost City hydrothermal field ecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 6257–6270. 10.1128/AEM.00574-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breier J. A., Gomez-Ibanez D., Reddington E., Huber J. A., Emerson D. (2012). A precision multi-sampler for deep-sea hydrothermal microbial mat studies. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 70, 83–90. 10.1016/j.dsr.2012.10.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butterfield D. A., Jonasson I. R., Massoth G. J., Feely R. A., Roe K. K., Embley R. E., et al. (1997). Seafloor eruptions and evolution of hydrothermal fluid chemistry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 355, 369–386. 10.1098/rsta.1997.0013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Butterfield D. A., Nakamura K. I., Takano B., Lilley M. D., Lupton J. E., Resing J. A., et al. (2011). High SO2 flux, sulfur accumulation, and gas fractionation at an erupting submarine volcano. Geology 39, 803–806. 10.1130/G31901.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Butterfield D. A., Roe K. K., Lilley M. D., Huber J. A., Baross J. A., Embley R. W., et al. (2004). Mixing, reaction and microbial activity in the sub-seafloor revealed by temporal and spatial variation in diffuse flow vents at Axial volcano, in The Subseafloor Biosphere at Mid-Ocean Ridges, eds Wilcock W. S. D., DeLong E. F., Kelley D. S., Baross J. A., Cary S. C. (Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union; ), 269–289. [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell B. J., Engel A. S., Porter M. L., Takai K. (2006). The versatile ε proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 458–468. 10.1038/nrmicro1414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caporaso J. G., Lauber C. L., Walters W. A., Berg-Lyons D., Huntley J., Fierer N., et al. (2012). Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624. 10.1038/ismej.2012.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan C. S., Emerson D., Luther G. W. (2016a). The role of microaerophilic Fe-oxidizing micro-organisms in producing banded iron formations. Geobiology 14, 509–528. 10.1111/gbi.12192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan C. S., McAllister S. M., Leavitt A. H., Glazer B. T., Krepski S. T., Emerson D. (2016b). The architecture of iron microbial mats reflects the adaptation of chemolithotrophic iron oxidation in freshwater and marine environments. Front. Microbiol. 7:796. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cole J. R., Wang Q., Fish J. A., Chai B., McGarrell D. M., Sun Y., et al. (2013). Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633–D642. 10.1093/nar/gkt1244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cordero O. X., Datta M. S. (2016). Microbial interactions and community assembly at microscales. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 227–234. 10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis R. E., Moyer C. L. (2008). Extreme spatial and temporal variability of hydrothermal microbial mat communities along the Mariana Island Arc and southern Mariana back-arc system. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113:B08S15 10.1029/2007JB005413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dick G. J., Anantharaman K., Baker B. J., Li M., Reed D. C., Sheik C. S. (2013). The microbiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent plumes: ecological and biogeographic linkages to seafloor and water column habitats. Front. Microbiol. 4:124. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Edgar R. C., Haas B. J., Clemente J. C., Quince C., Knight R. (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Edwards K. J., Glazer B. T., Rouxel O. J., Bach W., Emerson D., Davis R. E., et al. (2011). Ultra-diffuse hydrothermal venting supports Fe-oxidizing bacteria and massive umber deposition at 5000 m off Hawaii. ISME J. 5, 1748–1758. 10.1038/ismej.2011.48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Emerson D., Moyer C. L. (2010). Microbiology of seamounts common patterns observed in community structure. Oceanography 23, 148–163. 10.5670/oceanog.2010.67 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Emerson D., Rentz J. A., Lilburn T. G., Davis R. E., Aldrich H., Chan C., et al. (2007). A novel lineage of Proteobacteria involved in formation of marine Fe-oxidizing microbial mat communities. PLoS ONE 2:e667. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Emerson D., Scott J. J., Leavitt A., Fleming E., Moyer C. L. (2017). In situ estimates of iron-oxidation and accretion rates for iron-oxidizing bacterial mats at Lō'ihi Seamount. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 126, 31–39. 10.1016/j.dsr.2017.05.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Emerson J. B., Thomas B. C., Alvarez W., Banfield J. F. (2015). Metagenomic analysis of a high carbon dioxide subsurface microbial community populated by chemolithoautotrophs and bacteria and archaea from candidate phyla. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1686–1703. 10.1111/1462-2920.12817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Field E. K., Kato S., Findlay A. J., MacDonald D. J., Chiu B. K., Luther G. W., et al. (2016). Planktonic marine iron oxidizers drive iron mineralization under low-oxygen conditions. Geobiology 14, 499–508. 10.1111/gbi.12189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Field E. K., Sczyrba A., Lyman A. E., Harris C. C., Woyke T., Stepanauskas R., et al. (2015). Genomic insights into the uncultivated marine Zetaproteobacteria at Loihi Seamount. ISME J. 9, 857–870. 10.1038/ismej.2014.183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fike D. A., Gammon C. L., Ziebis W., Orphan V. J. (2008). Micron-scale mapping of sulfur cycling across the oxycline of a cyanobacterial mat: a paired nanoSIMS and CARD-FISH approach. ISME J. 2, 749–759. 10.1038/ismej.2008.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fleming E. J., Davis R. E., McAllister S. M., Chan C. S., Moyer C. L., Tebo B. M., et al. (2013). Hidden in plain sight: discovery of sheath-forming, iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria at Loihi Seamount, Hawaii, USA. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 85, 116–127. 10.1111/1574-6941.12104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Forget N. L., Murdock S. A., Juniper S. K. (2010). Bacterial diversity in Fe-rich hydrothermal sediments at two South Tonga Arc submarine volcanoes. Geobiology 8, 417–432. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00247.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fryer P. (1996). Evolution of the Mariana convergent plate margin system. Rev. Geophys. 34, 89–125. 10.1029/95RG03476 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fullerton H., Hager K. W., McAllister S. M., Moyer C. L. (2017). Hidden diversity revealed by genome-resolved metagenomics of iron-oxidizing microbial mats from Lō'ihi Seamount, Hawai'i. ISME J. 11, 1900–1914. 10.1038/ismej.2017.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilbert J. A., O'Dor R., King N., Vogel T. M. (2011). The importance of metagenomic surveys to microbial ecology: or why Darwin would have been a metagenomics scientist. Microb. Inform. Exp. 1:5. 10.1186/2042-5783-1-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Glazer B. T., Rouxel O. J. (2009). Redox speciation and distribution within diverse iron-dominated microbial habitats at Loihi Seamount. Geomicrobiol. J. 26, 606–622. 10.1080/01490450903263392 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gulledge J., Ahmad A., Steudler P. A., Pomerantz W. J., Cavanaugh C. M. (2001). Family- and genus-level 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for ecological studies of methanotrophic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4726–4733. 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4726-4733.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hanson R. S., Hanson T. E. (1996). Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 439–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harris J. K., Caporaso J. G., Walker J. J., Spear J. R., Gold N. J., Robertson C. E., et al. (2013). Phylogenetic stratigraphy in the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. ISME J. 7, 50–60. 10.1038/ismej.2012.79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoshino T., Kuratomi T., Morono Y., Hori T., Oiwane H., Kiyokawa S., et al. (2015). Ecophysiology of Zetaproteobacteria associated with shallow hydrothermal iron-oxyhydroxide deposits in Nagahama Bay of Satsuma Iwo-Jima, Japan. Front. Microbiol. 6:1554. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huber J. A., Cantin H. V., Huse S. M., Welch D. B. M., Sogin M. L., Butterfield D. A. (2010). Isolated communities of Epsilonproteobacteria in hydrothermal vent fluids of the Mariana Arc seamounts. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 73, 538–549. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00910.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Inagaki F., Takai K., Kobayashi H., Nealson K. H., Horikoshi K. (2003). Sulfurimonas autotrophica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfur-oxidizing ε-proteobacterium isolated from hydrothermal sediments in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53, 1801–1805. 10.1099/ijs.0.02682-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Inagaki F., Takai K., Nealson K. H., Horikoshi K. (2004). Sulfurovum lithotrophicum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the ε-Proteobacteria isolated from Okinawa Trough hydrothermal sediments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 1477–1482. 10.1099/ijs.0.03042-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ishibashi J.-I., Tsunogai U., Toki T., Ebina N., Gamo T., Sano Y., et al. (2015). Chemical composition of hydrothermal fluids in the central and southern Mariana Trough back arc basin. Deep Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 121, 126–136. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.06.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jesser K. J., Fullerton H., Hager K. W., Moyer C. L. (2015). Quantitative PCR analysis of functional genes in iron-rich microbial mats at an active hydrothermal vent system (Lō'ihi Seamount, Hawai'i). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 2976–2984. 10.1128/AEM.03608-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kappler A., Emerson D., Gralnick J. A., Roden E. E., Muehe E. M. (2015). Geomicrobiology of Iron, in Ehrlich's Geomicribiology, eds Ehrlich H. L., Newman D. K., Kappler A. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; ), 343–400. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kato S., Kobayashi C., Kakegawa T., Yamagishi A. (2009a). Microbial communities in iron-silica-rich microbial mats at deep-sea hydrothermal fields of the Southern Mariana Trough. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 2094–2111. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01930.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kato S., Yanagawa K., Sunamura M., Takano Y., Ishibashi J.-I., Kakegawa T., et al. (2009b). Abundance of Zetaproteobacteria within crustal fluids in back-arc hydrothermal fields of the Southern Mariana Trough. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 3210–3222. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02031.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Klindworth A., Pruesse E., Schweer T., Peplies J., Quast C., Horn M., et al. (2012). Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:e1. 10.1093/nar/gks808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Konhauser K. O., Hamade T., Raiswell R., Morris R. C., Ferris F. G., Southam G., et al. (2002). Could bacteria have formed the Precambrian banded iron formations? Geology 30, 1079–1082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kozich J. J., Westcott S. L., Baxter N. T., Highlander S. K., Schloss P. D. (2013). Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5112–5120. 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lupton J., Butterfield D., Lilley M., Evans L., Nakamura K.-I., Chadwick W., et al. (2006). Submarine venting of liquid carbon dioxide on a Mariana Arc volcano. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7:8 10.1029/2005GC001152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lupton J., Lilley M., Butterfield D., Evans L., Embley R., Massoth G., et al. (2008). Venting of a separate CO2-rich gas phase from submarine arc volcanoes: examples from the Mariana and Tonga-Kermadec arcs. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113:B08S12 10.1029/2007JB005467 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Macián M. C., Ludwig W., Schleifer K. H., Garay E., Pujalte M. J. (2001). Thalassomonas viridans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine gamma-proteobacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 1283–1289. 10.1099/00207713-51-4-1283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Makita H., Kikuchi S., Mitsunobu S., Takaki Y., Yamanaka T., Toki T., et al. (2016). Comparative analysis of microbial communities in iron-dominated flocculent mats in deep-sea hydrothermal environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5741–5755. 10.1128/AEM.01151-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Makita H., Tanaka E., Mitsunobu S., Miyazaki M., Nunoura T., Uematsu K., et al. (2017). Mariprofundus micogutta sp. nov., a novel iron-oxidizing zetaproteobacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal field at the Bayonnaise knoll of the Izu-Ogasawara arc, and a description of Mariprofundales ord. nov. and Zetaproteobacteria classis nov. Arch. Microbiol. 199, 335–346. 10.1007/s00203-016-1307-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Martin W., Baross J., Kelley D., Russell M. J. (2008). Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 805–814. 10.1038/nrmicro1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McAllister S. M., Davis R. E., McBeth J. M., Tebo B. M., Emerson D., Moyer C. L. (2011). Biodiversity and emerging biogeography of the neutrophilic iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 5445–5457. 10.1128/AEM.00533-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. McBeth J. M., Fleming E. J., Emerson D. (2013). The transition from freshwater to marine iron-oxidizing bacterial lineages along a salinity gradient on the Sheepscot River, Maine, USA. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5, 453–463. 10.1111/1758-2229.12033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. McBeth J. M., Little B. J., Ray R. I., Farrar K. M., Emerson D. (2011). Neutrophilic iron-oxidizing “Zetaproteobacteria” and mild steel corrosion in nearshore marine environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1405–1412. 10.1128/AEM.02095-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. McKay C. P., Porco C. C., Altheide T., Davis W. L., Kral T. A. (2008). The possible origin and persistence of life on Enceladus and detection of biomarkers in the plume. Astrobiology 8, 909–919. 10.1089/ast.2008.0265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Meyer J. L., Huber J. A. (2014). Strain-level genomic variation in natural populations of Lebetimonas from an erupting deep-sea volcano. ISME J. 8, 867–880. 10.1038/ismej.2013.206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Meyer-Dombard D. R., Amend J. P., Osburn M. R. (2013). Microbial diversity and potential for arsenic and iron biogeochemical cycling at an arsenic rich, shallow-sea hydrothermal vent (Tutum Bay, Papua New Guinea). Chem. Geol. 348, 37–47. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.02.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nakagawa S., Takai K. (2008). Deep-sea vent chemoautotrophs: diversity, biochemistry and ecological significance. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 65, 1–14. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00502.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nakagawa S., Inagaki F., Takai K., Horikoshi K., Sako Y. (2005a). Thioreductor micantisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel mesophilic, sulfur-reducing chemolithoautotroph within the ε-Proteobacteria isolated from hydrothermal sediments in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 599–605. 10.1099/ijs.0.63351-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nakagawa S., Takai K., Inagaki F., Hirayama H., Nunoura T., Horikoshi K., et al. (2005b). Distribution, phylogenetic diversity and physiological characteristics of epsilon-Proteobacteria in a deep-sea hydrothermal field. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1619–1632. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00856.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nakamura K., Toki T., Mochizuki N., Asada M., Ishibashi J., Nogi Y., et al. (2013). Discovery of a new hydrothermal vent based on an underwater, high-resolution geophysical survey. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 74, 1–10. 10.1016/j.dsr.2012.12.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P. R., O'Hara, et al. (2015). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2. 2–1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf
  64. Opatkiewicz A. D., Butterfield D. A., Baross J. A. (2009). Individual hydrothermal vents at Axial Seamount harbor distinct subseafloor microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 70, 413–424. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00747.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pedrós-Alió C. (2012). The rare bacterial biosphere. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 449–466. 10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Pérez-Rodríguez I., Bolognini M., Ricci J., Bini E., Vetriani C. (2015). From deep-sea volcanoes to human pathogens: a conserved quorum-sensing signal in Epsilonproteobacteria. ISME J. 9, 1222–1234. 10.1038/ismej.2014.214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Planavsky N., Rouxel O., Bekker A., Shapiro R., Fralick P., Knudsen A. (2009). Iron-oxidizing microbial ecosystems thrived in late Paleoproterozoic redox-stratified oceans. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 286, 230–242. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., Gerken J., Schweer T., Yarza P., et al. (2012). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. 10.1093/nar/gks.1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Available online at: http://www.R-project.org [Google Scholar]
  70. Raynaud X., Nunan N. (2014). Spatial ecology of bacteria at the microscale in soil. PLoS ONE 9:e87217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Reed D. C., Algar C. K., Huber J. A., Dick G. J. (2014). Gene-centric approach to integrating environmental genomics and biogeochemical models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 1879–1884. 10.1073/pnas.1313713111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Resing J. A., Sedwick P. N., German C. R., Jenkins W. J., Moffett J. W., Sohst B. M., et al. (2015). Basin-scale transport of hydrothermal dissolved metals across the South Pacific Ocean. Nature 523, 200–203. 10.1038/nature14577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rubin-Blum M., Antler G., Tsadok R., Shemesh E., Austin J. A., Coleman D. F., et al. (2014). First evidence for the presence of iron oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria at the Levantine continental margins. PLoS ONE 9:e91456. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schloss P. D., Westcott S. L., Ryabin T., Hall J. R., Hartmann M., Hollister E. B., et al. (2009). Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schnur S. R., Chadwick W. W., Embley R., Ferrini V., de Ronde C., Cashman K., et al. (2017). A decade of volcanic construction and destruction at the summit of NW Rota-1 Seamount: 2004-2014. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 1558–1584. 10.1002/2016JB013742 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Scott J. J., Breier J. A., Luther G. W., Emerson D. (2015). Microbial iron mats at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and evidence that Zetaproteobacteria may be restricted to iron-oxidizing marine systems. PLoS ONE 10:e0119284. 10.1371/journal.pone.0119284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Takai K., Campbell B. J., Cary S. C., Suzuki M., Oida H., Nunoura T., et al. (2005a). Enzymatic and genetic characterization of carbon and energy metabolisms by deep-sea hydrothermal chemolithoautotrophic isolates of Epsilonproteobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 7310–7320. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7310-7320.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Takai K., Hirayama H., Nakagawa T., Suzuki Y., Nealson K. H., Horikoshi K. (2005b). Lebetimonas acidiphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, acidophilic, hydrogen-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the ‘Epsilonproteobacteria’, isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal fumarole in the Mariana Arc. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 183–189. 10.1099/ijs.0.63330-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ter Braak C. J. (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67, 1167–1179. 10.2307/1938672 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Teske A., de Beer D., McKay L. J., Tivey M. K., Biddle J. F., Hoer D., et al. (2016). The Guaymas Basin hiking guide to hydrothermal mounds, chimneys, and microbial mats: complex seafloor expressions of subsurface hydrothermal circulation. Front. Microbiol. 7:75. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Waite D. W., Vanwonterghem I., Rinke C., Parks D. H., Zhang Y., Takai K., et al. (2017). Comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.). Front. Microbiol. 8:682. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M., Cole J. R. (2007). Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267. 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Warnes A. G. R., Bolker B., Bonebakker L., Huber W., Liaw A., Lumley T. (2015). Package Gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. R package version 2.16.0. Available online at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots
  84. White J. R., Nagarajan N., Pop M. (2009). Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000352. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Williams K. P., Gillespie J. J., Sobral B. W. S., Nordberg E. K., Snyder E. E., Shallom J. M., et al. (2010). Phylogeny of gammaproteobacteria. J. Bact. 192, 2305–2314. 10.1128/JB.01480-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wirsen C. O., Brinkhoff T., Kuever J., Muyzer G., Molyneaux S., Jannasch H. W. (1998). Comparison of a new Thiomicrospira strain from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge with known hydrothermal vent isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4057–4059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yue J. C., Clayton M. K. (2005). A similarity measure based on species proportions. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 34, 2123–2131. 10.1080/STA-200066418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES