Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2017 May 19;53(4):441–448. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.020

Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Pediatric Healthcare Visits and Hospitalizations

Ashley L Merianos 1, Roman A Jandarov 2, E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens 3
PMCID: PMC5610064  NIHMSID: NIHMS864447  PMID: 28532658

Abstract

Introduction

This study assessed the relationship between secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) as measured by serum cotinine and healthcare utilization among children.

Methods

In 2016, the 2009–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were analyzed including 4,985 children aged 3–19 years. Associations between SHSe and having a routine place for health care, type of place, and hospital utilization were examined using logistic regression models. Poisson regression analyses assessed the relationship between SHSe and number of hospital admissions. Relationships between SHSe and acute care visits and hospital utilization were examined among asthmatic children.

Results

SHSe level did not differ by having a routine place for health care, although children with high SHSe indicative of active smoking (cotinine ≥ 3 ng/mL) were 3.49 times (95% CI=1.77, 6.89) more likely to use an emergency department. Children with high SHSe were 2.85 times (95% CI=1.87, 4.34) more likely to have had an overnight hospital stay. Children with high SHSe had 2.05 times (95% CI=1.46, 2.87) the risk of having a higher number of hospital admissions for overnight stays versus children with no SHSe (cotinine <0.05 ng/mL). Among asthmatic children, those with high SHSe and low SHSe (cotinine 0.05–2.99 ng/mL) were more likely to have an acute care visit, overnight hospital stay, and higher number of hospital admissions than asthmatic children with no SHSe.

Conclusions

High SHSe is associated with increased healthcare utilization. The emergency department and inpatient settings are important venues in which to routinely offer cessation and SHSe reduction interventions.

INTRODUCTION

Despite a recent decline in secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), more than 37% of children in the U.S. are regularly exposed.1 Health effects of SHSe include respiratory symptoms, lower respiratory illnesses, ear infections, and sudden infant death syndrome.2,3 SHSe is associated with asthma, and asthmatic children who are exposed to SHS have more frequent and severe exacerbations.2,4 SHSe is a risk factor for these acute exacerbations that result in increased emergency department (ED) visits, intensive care unit admissions, hospitalizations, and readmissions.59 Economic costs attributable to smoking and SHSe are more than $156 billion3 and direct medical expenses for asthma exceed $50 billion in the U.S.10

Research linking SHSe to healthcare utilization in children has yielded discordant results. Prior investigations have found that SHS-exposed children are at increased risk for ED visits,11 hospitalizations, bed days for respiratory conditions, and total annual expenditures to care for these respiratory conditions.12 Another study found that SHS-exposed children who had Medicaid have significantly higher ED and prescription drug expenditures, potentially for respiratory illnesses.13 Conversely, prior observational studies have found a negative association between self-reported SHSe and children’s healthcare utilization, including fewer general practitioner visits for mild respiratory symptoms14 and preventive care visits15,16; this may be because caregivers who smoke may not utilize their child’s primary pediatric provider for ill or preventive care visits.17 Other research revealed no associations between self-reported SHSe and primary care or ED visits and hospitalizations.16 Similarly, mixed evidence for healthcare utilization among asthmatic children has been documented. In addition to studies that have shown a positive relationship between SHSe and healthcare visits and associated costs in children with asthma,8,9,18,19 an inconsistent association using salivary cotinine to measure SHSe was found, such that children with high cotinine levels had an elevated general practitioner contact rate, whereas children with moderate cotinine levels had a reduced rate of consultations for asthma.20

Although there are clear evidence-based guidelines that exhort pediatric practitioners to routinely screen for and provide SHSe counseling at every healthcare visit, rates of assistance for helping caregivers reduce their child’s SHSe remain low.21 An understanding of the relationship between objectively measured SHSe and healthcare utilization is critical to prioritize limited healthcare resources and provide pertinent information to healthcare professionals and policymakers that may inform decisions about how SHSe reduction interventions may decrease healthcare visits and costs. This information may mobilize pediatric practitioners to intervene with and provide brief counseling to all caregivers who smoke. The primary objective of this study was to assess the relationship between SHSe and healthcare utilization among a national sample of children aged 3–19 years. Routine places for healthcare and hospitalization outcomes among children with serum cotinine levels indicative of high SHSe and low SHSe were compared with those with no SHSe. Children with detectable SHSe were hypothesized to be at increased risk for higher healthcare utilization than children with no SHSe. As research indicates that most asthmatic children are exposed to SHS,22 the relationships between SHSe and acute care visits to the ED and urgent care centers for asthma-related complaints and hospitalizations were examined among asthmatic children. Asthmatic children with detectable SHSe were posited to be at elevated risk for having higher healthcare utilization than asthmatic children with no SHSe.

METHODS

Data Sample

In 2016, a secondary data analysis of the 2009–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) was performed. NHANES is a series of nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys that assess the health and nutrition status of the civilian non-institutionalized population in the U.S.23 Upon National Center for Health Statistics Research Ethics Review Board approval, written consent was obtained from participants who were selected using complex, stratified, multistage probability sampling procedures.24 During each survey, data were collected via a household interview and a subsequent medical examination that included collection of various physical examination and laboratory measurements.24 Children who were aged 3–19 years (N=4,985) were selected for the present study’s analyses because serum cotinine was collected among those aged ≥ 3 years.

The two most recent NHANES cycles were combined to create a large aggregated data set. A university-based IRB determined this study was “not human subjects’ research,” and was exempt from review.

Measures

The independent variable, serum cotinine, the metabolite of nicotine, is an objective biomarker for SHSe that has widespread use as an accepted measure of SHSe in epidemiologic research.2527 NHANES measured serum cotinine by an isotope dilution high performance liquid chromatography system. Based on the recommendations for serum cotinine cut points to distinguish high SHSe from low SHSe of Avila Tang et al.27 and Benowitz and colleagues,28 the following categories were used: (1) no SHSe (cotinine < 0.05 ng/mL); (2) low SHSe (cotinine 0.05–2.99 ng/mL); and (3) high SHSe (cotinine ≥ 3 ng/mL). This study was unable to distinguish between nonsmokers (cotinine < 2.99 ng/mL) and active smokers (cotinine ≥ 3 ng/mL) given self-report smoking status was not collected in children aged <12 years.

Several healthcare utilization outcome variables were investigated. The relationship between SHSe and whether children had a routine place to go for health care (yes, no) was examined. If yes, then a follow-up question asked what type of place they most often go for health care. Routine places were: clinic or health center, doctor’s office or HMO, ED, and hospital outpatient department (yes, no). Each type of place was also assessed based on SHSe.

The relationship between SHSe and hospitalization outcomes was assessed: (1) whether children were patients in a hospital overnight within 12 months (yes, no); and (2) how many overnight or longer hospital admissions had occurred within the past 12 months among those who were patients overnight. Number of hospital admissions was coded by NHANES as zero times, one time, two times, three times, four times, five times, and six times or more. SHSe and healthcare utilization related to children with asthma was examined including whether a doctor or other health professional ever said that the child had asthma (yes, no). A follow-up question on if children had a visit to an ED or urgent care center because of asthma (yes, no) was asked only among those who currently had an asthma diagnosis. Hospitalization outcomes in asthmatic children were also examined.

Sociodemographic variables that were used to adjust for differences between groups included children’s age, sex, race/ethnicity, and annual household income. Age was categorized as 3–11 years and 12–19 years. Race/ethnicity was categorized as white, black, Hispanic, and other race including multiracial. Income level included <$20,000/year, $20,000–$44,999/year, $45,000–74,999/year, and ≥ $75,000/year.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R, version 3.3.0. Examination weights provided by NHANES were used to account for the complex sampling design, differential probabilities of selection, and survey non-response, in addition to incorporating the complex design into the calculation of all variance estimates and statistical tests by using weighted statistical models to adjust for additional covariates using methods available in R.2931 Sociodemographic differences were examined based on the prevalence of SHSe in each group using chi-square tests. The associations between SHSe and healthcare utilization outcome variables were examined by testing a series of logistic regression models adjusting for the covariates. Follow-up Poisson regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between SHSe and number of hospital admissions. All statistical analyses were two-sided and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of sampled children, 52.5% were aged 3–11 years and 47.5% were aged 12–19 years; 48.8% were female; and more than half were non-Hispanic white (55.3%), followed by 22.0% Hispanic, 14.4% black, and 8.3% other race including multiracial. Based on household income, 17.6% of children had an income of < $20,000/year, 27.6% had an income of $20,000–$44,999/year, 19.2% had an income of $45,000–74,999/year, and 35.6% had an income of ≥ $75,000/year. Children with no SHSe represented 56% of the sample, whereas 35% had low SHSe and 9% had high SHSe. For asthmatic children, 49% had no SHSe, 39% had low SHSe, and 12% had high SHSe.

Statistically significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics between serum cotinine levels were noted. Sex, age, race/ethnicity, and household income differed based on SHSe (Table 1). Approximately 93.5% of children had a routine place to go for health care; 73.9% reported a doctor’s office or HMO as the most frequently accessed place, followed by a clinic or health center (23.6%), ED (1.3%), and hospital outpatient department (0.6%). Table 2 displays results from the adjusted logistic regression models of the associations between SHSe and routine place to go for health care. After adjustment, SHSe level was unrelated to whether children had a routine place to go for health care. Regarding type of routine place for health care, adjusted results showed that children with high SHSe (≥ 3 ng/mL) were 3.49 times more likely to report an ED as their routine place for health care compared with children with no SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL, 95% CI=1.77, 6.89, p < 0.001); no difference was observed between low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) and no SHSe levels. No associations were found between SHSe levels and the following routine places to go for health care: doctor’s office or HMO; clinic or health center; or hospital outpatient department.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Children Aged 3–19 Years by SHSe Level, NHANES 2009–2012

Sociodemographic characteristics Overall No SHSe < 0.05 ng/mL Low SHSe 0.05–2.99 ng/mL High SHSe > 3ng/mL

n % (95% CI) n % (95% Cl) n % (95% Cl) n % (95% Cl)
Child sex
 Female 2,391 48.8 (46.8, 50.8) 1,330 58 (55.3, 60.7) 908 35 (31.9, 38.1) 153 7 (2.9, 11.1)
 Male 2,594 51.2 (49.2, 53.2) 1,377 55 (52.5, 57.6) 969 34 (31.1, 36.9) 248 11 (7.1, 14.9)
Child age
 3–11 years 2,707 52.5 (50.5, 54.5) 1,482 59 (56.5, 61.6) 1,134 38 (35.3, 40.7) 91 3 (0.0, 6.5)
 12–19 years 2,278 47.5 (45.5, 49.5) 1,225 55 (52.3, 57.7) 743 32 (28.7, 35.3) 310 14 (10.1, 17.9)
Child race/ethnicity
 White 1,347 55.3 (52.6, 58.0) 650 56 (52.3, 59.7) 524 33 (28.9, 37.1) 173 11 (6.3, 15.7)
 Black 1,241 14.4 (12.4, 16.4) 419 34 (29.5, 38.5) 699 55 (51.3, 58.7) 123 11 (5.5, 16.5)
 Hispanic 1,823 22.0 (20.0, 24.0) 1,268 69 (66.5, 71.6) 482 26 (22.1, 29.9) 73 4 (0.0, 8.5)
 Other races/multiracial 574 8.3 (6.0, 10.7) 370 60 (55.1, 64.9) 172 32 (24.9, 39.1) 32 8 (0.0, 17.4)
Household income level
 <$20,000/year 1,138 17.6 (15.4, 19.76) 376 32 (27.3, 36.7) 611 52 (48.1, 55.9) 151 16 (10.1, 21.9)
 $20,000–$44,999/year 1,614 27.6 (25.4, 29.8) 810 48 (44.5, 51.5) 674 42 (38.3, 45.7) 130 10 (4.9, 15.1)
 $45,000–$74,999/year 789 19.2 (16.5, 21.9) 468 59 (54.5, 63.5) 275 35 (29.3, 40.7) 46 7 (0.0, 14.5)
 >$75,000/year 1,087 35.6 (32.7, 38.5) 841 75 (72.1, 77.9) 195 19 (13.5, 24.5) 51 6 (0.0, 12.5)

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p < 0.001).

N=4,985. n refers to raw scores; percentages are weighted and exclude missing data.

SHSe, secondhand smoke exposure; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Table 2.

Adjusted Prevalence of Routine Place to go for Health Care Stratified by SHSe Level in Children

Healthcare visits
Multivariable regressionb
No Yes

Cotinine level n % (95% CI)a n % (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Routine place to go for health care (n=4,984)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 195 6 (2.7, 9.3) 2,512 94 (93.0, 95.0) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 116 7 (2.3, 11.7) 1,760 93 (91.8, 94.2) 0.98 (0.76, 1.27)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 59 14 (5.2, 22.8) 342 86 (82.3, 89.7) 1.01 (0.71, 1.43)
Doctor’s office or HMO as most often place for health care (n=4,614)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 823 26 (23.1, 28.9) 1,689 74 (71.8, 76.2) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 577 29 (25.3, 32.7) 1,183 71 (68.5, 73.6) 1.02 (0.87, 1.19)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 119 31 (22.8, 39.2) 223 69 (62.9, 75.1) 0.84 (0.66, 1.08)
Clinic or health center as most often place for health care (n=4,614)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 1,748 77 (75.0, 79.0) 764 23 (20.1, 25.9) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 1,245 74 (71.7, 76.4) 515 26 (22.3, 29.7) 1.04 (0.89, 1.22)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 251 75 (69.7, 80.3) 91 25 (16.2, 33.8) 1.08 (0.83, 1.41)
Emergency department as most often place for health care (n=4,614)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 2,485 99 (98.6, 99.4) 27 1 (0.0, 4.7) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 1,729 99 (98.6, 99.4) 31 1 (0.0, 4.5) 0.73 (0.38, 1.41)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 321 95 (92.7, 97.4) 21 5 (0.0, 14.4) 3.49 (1.77, 6.89)
Hospital outpatient department as most often place for health care (n=4,614)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 2,495 99 (98.6, 99.4) 17 1 (0.0, 5.7) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 339 99 (98.0, 100.0) 25 1 (0.0, 4.9) 1.54 (0.70, 3.37)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 1,735 100 (100.0, 100.0) 3 0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.64 (0.14, 3.02)

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p < 0.001). n refers to raw scores and percentages are weighted. Missing values excluded.

a

Adjusted prevalence estimates and CIs.

b

Regression controlling for child’s sex, child age, child race/ethnicity, and household income level.

SHSe, secondhand smoke exposure; Ref, reference group

Adjusted logistic regression model results indicated that there was a statistically significant association between SHSe and overnight hospital stays in the past 12 months (Table 3). Children with high SHSe (≥ 3 ng/mL) were 2.85 times more likely to have had an overnight hospital stay than children with no SHSe (> 0.05 ng/mL; 95% CI=1.87, 4.34, p < 0.001); no difference was found between low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) and no SHSe. While controlling for covariates, there was a statistically significant difference between SHSe and number of hospital admissions (Table 4). Children with high SHSe had 2.05 times the risk of having a higher number of hospital admissions compared with children with no SHSe (95% CI=1.46, 2.87, p < 0.001); no difference was found between low SHSe and no SHSe.

Table 3.

Adjusted Prevalence of Overnight Hospital Stays, Asthma, and Acute Care Visits Stratified by SHSe Level

Overall
Multivariable regressionb
No Yes

Cotinine level n % (95% CI)a n % (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Overnight hospital stays in past year for all children (n=4,985)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 2,621 97 (96.4, 97.6) 86 3 (0.0, 6.5) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 1,793 96 (95.0, 97.0) 84 4 (0.0, 8.1) 1.30 (0.92, 1.82)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 368 90 (86.9, 93.1) 33 10 (0.0, 20.2) 2.85 (1.87, 4.34)***
Ever had asthma (n=4,985)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 2,309 84 (82.4, 85.6) 398 16 (12.5, 19.5) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 1,481 79 (76.8, 81.2) 396 21 (17.1, 24.9) 1.28 (1.09–1.51)***
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 298 75 (70.1, 79.9) 103 25 (16.6, 33.4) 1.34 (1.05–1.71)***
Children with asthma
 Had an acute care visit for asthma in past year (n = 418)c
  No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 143 85 (79.1, 90.9) 32 15 (2.7, 27.4) Ref
  Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 139 73 (65.6, 80.5) 68 27 (16.4, 37.6) 2.17 (1.24–3.80)**
  High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 27 66 (48.2, 83.8) 9 34 (3.0, 65.0) 4.74 (1.93–11.68)***
 Overnight hospital stays in past year for children with asthma (n = 897)
  No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 378 96 (94.0, 98.0) 20 4 (0.0, 12.6) Ref
  Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 368 94 (91.7, 96.4) 28 6 (0.0, 14.8) 1.40 (1.05–1.88)**
  High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 93 88 (81.3, 94.7) 10 12 (0.0, 32.2) 4.44 (3.14–6.28)***

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001).

N=4,985. n refers to raw scores and percentages are weighted.

a

Adjusted prevalence estimates and CIs.

b

Regression controlling for child’s sex, child age, child race/ethnicity, and household income level.

c

Question was only asked among those who still have asthma.

SHSe, secondhand smoke exposure; Ref, reference group

Table 4.

Adjusted Prevalence of Number of Hospital Admissions for Overnight Stays Stratified by SHSe Level in Children

Cotinine level Number of hospital admissions for overnight stays in past year
Poisson regressionb
RR (95% CI)
0 times 1 time 2 times 3 times 4 times 5 times >6 times

n %(95% CI)a n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)
Overall (N=4,985)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 2,724 96.7 (96.1 97.3) 72 2.6 (0.0, 6.3) 7 0.2 (0.0, 3.5) 8 0.3 (0, 4.0) 1 0.1 (0.0, 6.4) 0 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 4 0.1 (0.0, 3.2) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 404 90.4 (87.5, 93.3) 35 7.8 (0.0, 16.6) 2 0.5 (0.0, 10.3) 5 1.1 (0.0, 10.3) 0 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 1 0.2 (0.0, 9.0) 1.06 (0.81, 1.40)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 1,657 96.2 (95.2, 97.2) 48 2.8 (0.0, 7.5) 10 0.5 (0.0, 4.8) 4 0.2 (0.0, 4.5) 1 0.1 (0.0, 6.4) 1 0.1 (0.0, 6.4) 1 0.1 (0.0,6.4) 2.05 (1.46, 2.87)
Children with asthma (N=846)
 No SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL) 421 95.9 (93.9, 97.9) 11 2.5 (0.0, 11.7) 3 0.7 (0.0, 9.9) 2 0.5 (0.0, 9.9) 1 0.2 (0.0, 9.6) 0 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 1 0.2 (0.0, 9.6) Ref
 Low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL) 95 88 (81.5, 94.4) 7 6.5 (0.0, 24.7) 1 0.9 (0.0, 19.7) 4 3.7 (0.0, 22.1) 0 0 (0.0, 0.0) 0 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 1 0.9 (0.0, 19.7) 1.10 (0.89, 1.37)
 High SHSe (> 3 ng/mL) 330 94.6 (92.2, 96.9) 15 4.3 (0.0, 14.5) 2 0.6 (0.0, 11.0) 0 0 (0.0, 0.0) 1 0.3 (0.0, 10.9) 0 0.1 (0.0, 0.0) 1 0.3 (0.0, 10.9) 3.87 (3.06, 4.89)

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p < 0.001). n refers to raw scores and percentages are weighted. Missing values excluded.

a

Adjusted prevalence estimates and CIs.

b

Regression controlling for child’s sex, child age, child race/ethnicity, and household income level.

SHSe, secondhand smoke exposure; RR, relative risk; Ref, reference group

Approximately 17.4% of children were told by a doctor or other health professional that they had asthma. Statistically significant differences were found between all SHSe levels and ever having an asthma diagnosis (Table 3). Children with high SHSe (≥ 3 ng/mL, OR=1.34, 95% CI=1.05, 1.71, p < 0.001) and low SHSe (0.05–2.99 ng/mL, OR=1.28, 95% CI=1.09, 1.51, p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to have ever had asthma than children with no SHSe (< 0.05 ng/mL). Among asthmatic children, there were statistically significant associations between all SHSe levels and having an acute care visit for asthma (Table 3). Asthmatic children with high SHSe (OR=4.74, 95% CI=1.93, 11.68, p < 0.001) and low SHSe (OR=2.17, 95% CI=1.24, 3.80, p < 0.01) were significantly more likely to have had a visit to an ED or urgent care center because of asthma than those with no SHSe. Asthmatic children with high SHSe (OR=4.44, 95% CI=3.14, 6.28, p < 0.001) and low SHSe (OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.05, 1.88, p < 0.01) were more likely to have had an overnight hospital stay than asthmatic children with no SHSe (Table 3). Asthmatic children with high SHSe were also at 3.87 times the risk of having a higher number of hospital admissions than asthmatic children with no SHSe (95% CI=3.06, 4.89, p < 0.001); no difference was found between low SHSe and no SHSe (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the association between biochemically validated SHSe and healthcare utilization among children using a nationally representative sample was assessed. Previous studies evaluating SHSe related to healthcare utilization have yielded mixed results, which may be due to lack of biochemical validation of caregiver reported SHSe in most studies, and therefore this study was undertaken to address the current gap in the literature. As hypothesized, children with high SHSe were at elevated risk for higher healthcare utilization. Although differences were not observed between those with low SHSe and no SHSe based on healthcare utilization, it is important to note that 44% of children had detectable SHSe (> 0.05 ng/mL). This is consistent with national research, which found that 24.2 million children (37.3%) had detectable SHSe as measured by serum cotinine.1 These findings provide further impetus to comply with the American Academy of Pediatrics32,33 recommendation to screen for and provide SHSe reduction counseling to caregivers who smoke during all healthcare visits.

The finding that EDs are a common place for health care among children with high, biochemically validated SHSe confirms results of a prior study conducted by Merianos et al.17 using self-reported SHSe. The present study found that children with high SHSe are 3.5 times more likely to routinely seek ill care or health advice at an ED than children with no SHSe. Higher ORs were found in the present study compared with the previous study that relied on self-report. The prior study indicated that children with home SHSe were at increased risk to seek care at the ED (i.e., OR=1.40) than unexposed children, potentially due to caregivers under-reporting their child’s SHSe level.27,34 These results underscore the importance of screening and intervening with caregivers in the ED about their child’s SHSe to mobilize them to reduce their child’s exposure by quitting smoking. Prior research has revealed that smoking-cessation efforts targeting caregivers in the ED are accepted by both pediatric ED staff and caregivers,35 and increase caregiver quit attempts.35,36 However, a significant proportion of children with SHSe are not being identified in the ED as screening rates are low and counseling rates are even lower.37,38 Promising research suggests that the use of clinical decision support systems within the electronic health record may help to facilitate the systematic screening and counseling of all caregivers who smoke by healthcare providers in the ED and other settings.3943 As healthcare providers find clinical decision support system use both feasible and acceptable, further research is needed to determine how the routine use of these tools impacts future SHSe-related morbidity, visits, and costs in pediatric patients.

The present study found significant associations between SHSe and both hospital utilization outcome variables, indicating that children with high SHSe were more likely to have stayed in a hospital overnight and have a higher number of hospital admissions than children with no SHSe. Even though the study was unable to assess illness severity in children who were hospitalized given the nature of the NHANES data, prior studies have found that SHSe in children is associated with elevated risk of illness severity among children who are hospitalized, including those with asthma.44,45 Furthermore, as evidenced by prior research,43,46,47 hospitalization is an opportune time to routinely screen for SHSe and use as a “teachable moment” to educate caregivers about the dangers of exposing their child to tobacco smoke. Though routine screening in the inpatient setting is feasible46,47 and caregivers are willing to receive smoking-cessation counseling while their child is hospitalized,48 few hospitals currently have standardized system supports (e.g., a mandatory child SHSe question during admission) for healthcare professionals to screen and intervene with caregivers about their smoking behaviors. Strengthening policies and procedures of healthcare system supports, such as clinical decision support system use and implementation of evidence based-guidelines,49,50 may increase practitioners’ rates of engaging caregivers in meaningful SHSe reduction discussions to reduce their child’s SHSe.43

The present study’s findings indicated that 39% of children with asthma had high SHSe and 12% had low SHSe; thus, more than half (51%) of asthmatic children are exposed to SHS, which parallels prior findings.22 Results also revealed that children with high SHSe and low SHSe were at increased risk to have ever had asthma. Consistent with the hypothesis, the present study found statistically significant associations between all SHSe levels and having an acute care visit to the ED or an urgent care center for asthma and hospital utilization among asthmatic children. Asthmatic children with high SHSe and low SHSe were significantly more likely to have had an acute care visit to the ED or urgent care center or an overnight hospital stay. Similar to findings including the whole sample, results indicated that asthmatic children with high SHSe were at increased risk of having a higher number of hospital admissions. The prevalence of childhood asthma continues to rise in the U.S., especially among those who are non-Hispanic black and come from low socioeconomic backgrounds.51 Thus, asthma-related healthcare encounters among children have remained stable over the past decade for ED visits and hospitalizations.52 This is not surprising, especially among SHS-exposed children, given SHSe increases the risk of asthma severity and related ED visits, hospitalizations, and even length of hospital stays.59,45,53 Initiatives to eliminate SHSe among children with asthma are greatly needed.

Limitations

This study is not without limitations. The NHANES design is cross-sectional in nature, and inferences are not causal. Random cotinine measurements may have a limited capacity to identify SHSe after 1–2 days.25 Because self-report smoking data were not used to measure the child’s smoking status, active smoking may have confounded the present study’s results among older children. The study was limited to the measures provided by NHANES, including the wording and formatting of self-reported healthcare utilization questions where participants may not have understood the differences between types of healthcare places and social desirability bias may have occurred. Although potential sociodemographic confounding variables were adjusted for in analyses, residual confounding by factors unaccounted for in the models may have occurred and unexpectedly biased results. Longitudinal research would provide insight into the effect SHSe has on the child’s illness and healthcare utilization rates over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found that objective measurements of SHSe were associated with increased utilization of EDs and hospitalizations among SHS-exposed children with high serum cotinine levels. The study also found that high SHSe and low SHSe had a prominent impact on acute care visits for asthma and overnight hospital stays among asthmatic children. Healthcare settings that care for a high volume of SHS-exposed children, including the ED and inpatient settings, should be considered important venues to routinely incorporate SHSe screening, smoking-cessation, and SHSe reduction interventions—especially among children with SHSe-related illnesses such as asthma.32,38 These efforts may increase quit attempts, reduce smoking among caregivers, and decrease potentially preventable and costly ED visits and hospitalizations.36,48 Future research should assess illness severity and healthcare costs related to these visits. Assessing the cost–benefits of providing cessation interventions to caregivers of SHS-exposed children may help to drive the implementation of standardized SHSe screening and counseling in all pediatric settings.

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD083354 (Dr. Mahabee-Gittens).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

References

RESOURCES