Skip to main content
Biology Open logoLink to Biology Open
. 2017 Jul 27;6(9):1270–1278. doi: 10.1242/bio.026211

Dlx3b/4b is required for early-born but not later-forming sensory hair cells during zebrafish inner ear development

Simone Schwarzer 1, Sandra Spieß 1, Michael Brand 1, Stefan Hans 1,*
PMCID: PMC5612237  PMID: 28751305

ABSTRACT

Morpholino-mediated knockdown has shown that the homeodomain transcription factors Dlx3b and Dlx4b are essential for proper induction of the otic-epibranchial progenitor domain (OEPD), as well as subsequent formation of sensory hair cells in the developing zebrafish inner ear. However, increasing use of reverse genetic approaches has revealed poor correlation between morpholino-induced and mutant phenotypes. Using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis, we generated a defined deletion eliminating the entire open reading frames of dlx3b and dlx4b (dlx3b/4b) and investigated a potential phenotypic difference between mutants and morpholino-mediated knockdown. Consistent with previous findings obtained by morpholino-mediated knockdown of Dlx3b and Dlx4b, dlx3b/4b mutants display compromised otic induction, the development of smaller otic vesicles and an elimination of all indications of otic specification when combined with loss of foxi1, a second known OEPD competence factor in zebrafish. Furthermore, sensorigenesis is also affected in dlx3b/4b mutants. However, we find that only early-born sensory hair cells (tether cells), that seed and anchor the formation of otoliths, are affected. Later-forming sensory hair cells are present, indicating that two genetically distinct pathways control the development of early-born and later-forming sensory hair cells. Finally, impairment of early-born sensory hair cell formation in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos reverses the common temporal sequence of neuronal and sensory hair cell specification in zebrafish, resembling the order of cell specification in amniotes; Neurog1 expression before Atoh1 expression. We conclude that the Dlx3b/4b-dependent pathway has been either acquired newly in the fish lineage or lost in other vertebrate species during evolution, and that the events during early inner ear development are remarkably similar in fish and amniotes in the absence of this pathway.

KEY WORDS: Inner ear, Neurogenesis, Sensorigenesis, Tether cells, Dlx3b/4b, Foxi1, CRISPR/Cas9, Zebrafish


Summary: The transcription factors Dlx3b and Dlx4b control the formation of early-born sensory hair cells or tether cells in the developing zebrafish inner ear.

INTRODUCTION

The vertebrate inner ear is a sensory organ mediating hearing and balance. It derives from the otic placode, a transient ectodermal thickening adjacent to the developing hindbrain, and contains a complex arrangement of mechanosensory hair cells, nonsensory supporting cells and sensory neurons (Barald and Kelley, 2004; Raft and Groves, 2015; Whitfield, 2015). Inner ear formation is a multistep process initiated by the establishment of the preplacodal region, a zone of ectoderm running around the anterior border of the neural plate containing precursors for all sensory placodes (Streit, 2007). The preplacodal region is further specified into a common otic-epibranchial progenitor domain (OEPD) that in zebrafish also contains the progenitors of the anterior lateral line ganglion (Chen and Streit, 2013; McCarroll et al., 2012; Hans et al., 2013). Signaling molecules of the fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) and Wnt/wingless families are critical for OEPD induction and differentiation in all vertebrates examined to date (Phillips et al., 2001; Léger and Brand, 2002; Maroon et al., 2002; Solomon and Fritz, 2002; Alvarez et al., 2003; Solomon et al., 2003; Wright and Mansour, 2003; Ladher et al., 2005; Freter et al., 2008; McCarroll et al., 2012; Ladher, 2017). In amniotes, competence to respond to Fgf signals is conferred by Foxi3, a forkhead transcription factor, whereas in zebrafish, competence is provided by the functional homolog Foxi1 and additionally by the distal-less homeodomain transcription factors Dlx3b and Dlx4b (Dlx3b/4b) (Hans et al., 2004; Solomon et al., 2004; Yamanishi et al., 2012; Khatri et al., 2014; Birol et al., 2016). The otic placode develops into the otocyst or otic vesicle with mechanosensory hair cells generated in the sensory epithelia and neuronal precursors delaminating as neuroblasts from the ventral face of the otic vesicle (Haddon and Lewis, 1996; Rubel and Fritzsch, 2002). Both lineages require the activity of the proneural proteins Atonal homologue1 (Atoh1) and Neurogenin1 (Neurog1) (Ma et al., 1998; Bermingham et al., 1999; Andermann et al., 2002; Fritzsch et al., 2010). Recent results indicate that Foxi1 and Dlx3b/4b act upstream of Neurog1 and Atoh1, respectively, implying transcriptional inputs for neural and sensory cell formation to OEPD stages in zebrafish (Hans et al., 2013). Notably, the temporal specification of neuroblasts and hair cells is not constrained across phyla, and is reversed in zebrafish compared with amniotes. In mouse, expression of Neurog1 in the developing inner ear occurs at embryonic day (E) 8.75 preceding Atoh1 expression at E10.5 (Fritzsch et al., 2010). In zebrafish, atoh1b is initiated at 10.5 h postfertilization (hpf) followed by atoh1a at 14 hpf (Millimaki et al., 2007), preceding otic neurog1 expression at 15 hpf (Radosevic et al., 2014). The reasoning behind this reversal is currently unknown. In zebrafish, the first hair cells can be observed already at 20 hpf, whereas neuronal precursors arise between 22 to 42 hpf (Haddon and Lewis, 1996; Riley et al., 1997). Early-born hair cells form in an atoh1b-dependent manner and give rise to tether cells that seed and anchor the formation of otoliths, large solidified bio-crystals that mediate vestibular function (Millimaki et al., 2007). Recent results predict the existence of a hair cell-specific otolith precursor-binding factor, but the identity of such a factor remains elusive (Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2012). In contrast, amniotes do not form otoliths, but structurally similar bio-crystals called otoconia, located above hair cells of the saccule and utricle, enable detection of gravity and linear acceleration (Lundberg et al., 2015).

In zebrafish, knockdown is easily achieved via antisense morpholino oligonucleotides, which possess a modified backbone providing protection from degradation and bind close to the translational start site or at splice sites, thus blocking translation or splicing, respectively (Bill et al., 2009). However, an increasing number of gene knockout studies using programmable nucleases have revealed discrepancies with published morpholino-induced phenotypes (Kok et al., 2015; Novodvorsky et al., 2015; Boer et al., 2016). In particular, in a large collection of knockout lines, >70% of morpholino-induced phenotypes failed to be observed in the corresponding mutants (Kok et al., 2015). This suggests that morpholino-mediated off-target effects are much more prevalent than previously stated, and highlight the need to re-evaluate the use of antisense-based technology for characterization of gene function in the zebrafish. Here, we revisited the function of Dlx3b/4b during zebrafish OEPD development using a newly generated null mutant carrying a defined deletion of dlx3b and dlx4b (dlx3b/4b). We show that dlx3b/4b mutants confirm previous findings generated by morpholino-mediated knockdown with respect to compromised otic induction and the development of smaller otic vesicles. Furthermore, combined loss of dlx3b/4b and foxi1 eliminates all indications of otic specification at all stages examined. Additionally, we confirm that Dlx3b/4b is required for proper formation of sensory hair cells. However, we find that dlx3b/4b mutants only impair the formation of early-born hair cells (also known as tether cells) required for seeding and anchoring the formation of otoliths, whereas later-forming sensory hair cells are present. This indicates that two genetically distinct pathways result in the formation of early-born and later-forming sensory hair cells, respectively. Furthermore, loss of early-born hair cells in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos reverses the temporal order of neuronal and hair cell specification, resembling the order of cell specification in amniotes, which express Neurog1 before Atoh1. In summary, we conclude that the Dlx3b/4b-dependent pathway has either been acquired in the fish lineage or lost in other vertebrate lineages and that inner ear development is highly similar in amniotes and fish in the absence of this pathway.

RESULTS

Generation of a defined chromosomal deletion at the dlx3b and dlx4b locus

We envisioned that the best strategy to generate an unambiguous null allele would be to introduce a defined deletion eliminating the entire open reading frame in the locus of interest. This approach is particularly useful for avoiding alternative translational start sites and allows easy identification of carrier fish. To achieve a simultaneous deletion of dlx3b and dlx4b, which are organized in a tail-to-tail bigene cluster (dlx3b/4b), two CRISPR/Cas9 target sites separated by 21,045 bp up- and downstream from the cluster were chosen (Fig. 1A). Injection of gRNA that targeted only a single site along with mRNA encoding a dual NLS-tagged zebrafish codon-optimized Cas9 protein into single-cell zebrafish embryos resulted in site-specific insertion/deletion (indel) mutations in the corresponding target sites as evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing (data not shown). After co-injection of both gRNAs, deletion events in the genomic region between the two target sites were detected by PCR (primer 1f and rev), which were confirmed by sequencing (data not shown). Injected siblings were grown to adulthood and tested for germ-line transmission of the deletion to F1 fish using the previously established PCR strategy. Among the 80 animals examined, one founder was identified carrying the deletion of the entire dlx3b/4b locus was established (Fig. 1A). In situ hybridization of embryos at early segmentation stages obtained from incrosses of heterozygous carriers showed a complete loss of dlx3b mRNA in 25% of the clutch, corroborating the absence of the dlx3b gene (Fig. 1B). In order to enable accurate genotyping of progeny from incrosses of heterozygous carriers, we established a multiplex PCR strategy by adding a second forward primer (f2), which anneals to genomic sequences absent in the dlx3b/4b deletion allele (Fig. 1A). Genotyping of five embryos selected at 24 hpf that displayed an obvious phenotype (see below) proved to harbor only the dlx3b/4b deletion allele indicated by the presence of a 618-bp amplicon (Fig. 1C). In contrast, nine randomly selected embryos with wild-type morphology contained the wild-type allele shown by the presence of a 473-bp fragment either in homozygosity or in combination with the dlx3b/4b deletion allele (Fig. 1C). Taken together, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis resulted in the predicted generation of a dlx3b/4b null allele.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Generation of a dlx3b and dlx4b (dlx3b/4b) null allele. (A) Scheme of the dlx3b/4b bigene cluster at chromosome 12. Transcriptional start sites are indicated by arrows. Exon sequences with translated and untranslated regions are represented in dark and light grey, respectively. Positions of the CRISPR/Cas9 target sequences, separated by 21,045 bp, and their sequences in the wild-type and dlx3b/4b deletion allele are indicated in orange and red. Primers used for genotyping (1f, 2f and rev) are shown as half arrows. (B) In situ hybridization of dlx3b at early OEPD stages (three somites). Expression of dlx3b is absent in 25% of embryos obtained from a dlx3b/4b heterozygote incross. Scale bar: 500 µm. (C) Multiplex PCR using primers 1f, 2f and rev reveals the presence of the dlx3b/4b deletion (618 bp) and wild-type allele (473 bp). M indicates a marker for molecular size standard.

Loss of Dlx3b/4b results in compromised OEPD induction and subsequent otic vesicle hypoplasia

Previously, morpholino-mediated knockdown of Dlx3b/4b has been reported to result in improper OEPD induction and subsequent compromised otic placode/vesicle formation (Solomon and Fritz, 2002). Indeed, incrosses of identified heterozygous dlx3b/4b deletion carriers confirmed previous findings and resulted in embryos with smaller otic vesicles, which were also demonstrated by starmaker (stm) expression, a marker of the entire otic epithelium (Fig. 2A,B,I,J). Reduction of otic tissue was partially rescued during subsequent development, but otolith formation remained defective in dlx3b/4b mutants compared with wild-type siblings (Fig. 2E,F). Furthermore, whereas foxi1 mutants display reduced otic induction with highly variable otic vesicle morphologies (Nissen et al., 2003; Solomon et al., 2003), analysis of dlx3b/4b;foxi1 double mutants showed that combined loss of both factors results in a complete absence of otic tissue (Fig. 2C,D,G,H,K,L), corroborating previous findings using morpholino-mediated knockdown of Dlx3b/4b (Hans et al., 2004; Solomon et al., 2004). Also consistent with previous findings, expression of pax8, the earliest OEPD marker, which is completely dependent on Foxi1, was unchanged in dlx3b/4b mutants in comparison with wild-type siblings (Fig. 3A-C). Similarly, sox9a, another early OEPD marker, which is partially dependent on Foxi1 activity, was also unchanged in dlx3b/4b mutants (Fig. 3E-G), contradictory to results reporting reduced expression of sox9a in the OEPD after morpholino-mediated knockdown of Dlx3b/4b (Liu et al., 2003). In contrast, pax2a was absent at early OEPD stages in both dlx3b/4b and foxi1 mutants in comparison with control siblings, but recovered at late OEPD stages, and pax2a cDNA probes labeled size-reduced otic placodes in both mutant backgrounds (Fig. 3I-K,M-O and data not shown). Expression of pax8, sox9a and early OEPD pax2a in dlx3b/4b;foxi1 double-mutant embryos mimicked findings in single mutants, but placodal pax2a expression failed to form, foreshadowing the complete absence of otic specification (Fig. 3D,H,L,P). Combined and with the exception of an effect of sox9a on early OEPD expression, these results show a strong correlation between morpholino-induced and mutant phenotypes of dlx3b/4b, and indicate that the previously used morpholinos represent a reliable tool to knock down dlx3b/4b gene function.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Loss of Dlx3b/4b results in otic vesicle hypoplasia. (A-H) Live images of wild-type control embryos (A,E), dlx3b/4b mutants (B,F), foxi1 mutants (C,G) and dlx3b/4b; foxi1 double mutants (D,H) at 24 hpf (A-D) and 72 hpf (E-H). (I-L) Expression of starmaker (stm), a marker of the otic epithelium in wild-type control siblings (I), dlx3b/4b mutants (J), foxi1 mutants (K) and dlx3b/4b; foxi1 double mutants (L) at 24 hpf. Lateral views are seen with anterior to the left. Scale bars: 50 µm in H; 40 µm in L.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Loss of Dlx3b/4b results in compromised OEPD induction. In situ hybridization of pax8 (A-D), sox9a (E-H) and pax2a (I-P) at early OEPD (two and five somites) and placodal (12 somites) stages in wild-type control embryos (A,E,I,M), dlx3b/4b mutants (B,F,J,N), foxi1 mutants (C,G,K,O) and dlx3b/4b; foxi1 double mutants (D,H,L,P). (A-L) Dorsal views with anterior to the left. (M-P) Dorsolateral views with anterior to the left. Scale bar: 40 µm.

Loss of early-born, but not later-forming, sensory hair cells in dlx3b/4b mutants

Previous studies have shown that Dlx3b/4b is required for proper expression of atoh1a and atoh1b and subsequent formation of mechanosensory hair cells (Millimaki et al., 2007; Hans et al., 2013). In addition, although morpholino-mediated knockdown of Dlx3b/4b results in a fully penetrant phenotype with complete failure in otolith development, formation of hair cells at later stages has been reported (Solomon and Fritz, 2002; Liu et al., 2003). This discrepancy could be explained either by insufficient supply of dlx3b/4b morpholino during injection, degradation of dlx3b/4b morpholino during subsequent development, or by the formation of sensory hair cells in a Dlx3b/4b-independent manner. This question can be addressed only by the production of a mutant allele. Hence, we analyzed sensory lineage development using myosin VIIAa (myo7aa), a marker of sensory hair cells (Ernest et al., 2000). Consistent with previous reports using morpholino knockdown (Millimaki et al., 2007; Hans et al., 2013), dlx3b/4b mutant embryos displayed a complete loss of myo7aa in comparison with control embryos, which expressed myo7aa at 24 hpf in discrete anterior and posterior domains of the otic vesicle corresponding to the prospective utricular and saccular maculae (Fig. 4A,B). At 32 hpf, the number of mature hair cells in the two sensory patches had increased in control embryos. Expression of myo7aa could now also be detected in the prospective utricular domain of the otic vesicle in dlx3b/4b mutants (Fig. 4C,D). To corroborate this finding, we analyzed expression of Tg(pou4f3:GAP-GFP,) which is a GFP marker for all differentiated hair cells of the developing otic vesicle (Xiao et al., 2005). In wild-type siblings at 21 hpf, GFP fluorescence was present in early-born hair cells or tether cells (which form in pairs at the anterior and posterior ends of the otocyst), whereas GFP could not be detected in otic vesicles of dlx3b/4b mutants (Fig. 4E,F). Slightly later, at 24 hpf, GFP expression was initiated in otic vesicles of dlx3b/4b mutants, but was initially restricted to the prospective utricular domain (Fig. 4G,H). Subsequently, additional hair cells formed also in the domain marking the future saccular maculae of dlx3b/4b mutants (Fig. 4I,J). Higher magnifications showed that hair cell kinocilia formation appeared to occur normally (Fig. 4I′,J′). However, quantification revealed that the total number of GFP-positive hair cells remained significantly lower in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos in comparison with control siblings (Fig. 4K). Previous studies have shown that early-born hair cells are generated in an atoh1b-dependent manner (Millimaki et al., 2007; Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2012). Consistently, atoh1b expression in the OEPD or otic placode was never observed in dlx3b/4b mutants compared with control embryos (Fig. 5A-D). However, at 22 hpf, atoh1b expression was initiated in dlx3b/4b mutants and present during subsequent vesicle stages, although confined to the domain of the future utricular macula (Fig. 5E,F). Similarly, atoh1a expression was absent in dlx3b/4b mutants, but present in wild-type embryos at placodal stages (Fig. 5G,H). Expression of atoh1a was activated prior to atoh1b at 20 hpf and continued to be expressed in otic vesicles at 24 hpf in dlx3b/4b mutants. Compared with control siblings at 24 hpf with atoh1a expression in the prospective utricular and saccular maculae, atoh1a expression was initially confined to the anterior domain of the developing otic vesicle in dlx3b/4b mutants, but also expressed in a posterior patch at later stages (Fig. 5I,J and data not shown). Because dlx3b/4b mutants do not form functional early-born hair cells resulting in absence of otoliths, we also analyzed the expression of otogelin (otog). Otog can be found in the acellular membranes of the inner ear in zebrafish and amniotes (Lundberg et al., 2015). In addition, otog is required for proper seeding of otolith precursor particles in zebrafish (Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2015). Otolith precursor particles appeared in the otic vesicle at 18 hpf, and bind exclusively to the tips of the kinocilia of the first hair/early born cells or tether cells (Riley et al., 1997). We found that expression of otog could already be detected at OEPD and placodal stages in control, but not dlx3b/4b mutant, embryos (Fig. 5G,H and data not shown). At vesicle stages, expression of otog marked two domains at the poles of the otic vesicle in control siblings, whereas only the anterior domain was present in dlx3b/4b mutants (Fig. 5I,J). Taken together, these results show that only early-born hair cells (tether cells), which are required for otolith formation, are dependent on Dlx3b/4b activity. Later-forming hair cells develop through a Dlx3b/4b-independent mechanism. Furthermore, onset of otog expression in dlx3b/4b mutants is delayed but not sufficient to rescue otolith seeding.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Delayed formation of sensory hair cells in dlx3b/4b-deficient embryos. (A-D) In comparison with control embryos at 24 hpf and 32 hpf, myo7aa expression is initially absent and subsequently restricted to the domain of the future utricular macula in dlx3b/4b mutants. (E-J) Expression of Tg(pou4f3:GAP-GFP) in control siblings and dlx3b/4b mutants at 21 hpf, 24 hpf and 48 hpf confirms delayed formation of sensory hair cells in dlx3b/4b-deficient embryos. Arrowheads indicate positions of the nascent otoliths in wild-type embryos. Note the initial onset of GFP in the prospective domain of the utricular macula and the subsequent expression in the future domain of the saccular macula in dlx3b/4b mutants. (I′,J′) Kinocilia formation appears normally in control siblings and dlx3b/4b mutants. Lateral views are shown with anterior to the left. NT, neural tube; OV, otic vesicle. Scale bars: 40 µm in D; 25 µm in J; 10 µm in J′. (K) Time course showing the mean number of pou4f3:GAP-GFP-positive hair cells in the domain of the future utricular and saccular domain of control (ctrl) and dlx3b/4b mutant embryos. dlx3b/4b-deficient embryos exhibit a significantly reduced number of sensory hair cells at 21 hpf and 24 hpf, and display significantly fewer hair cells at 48 hpf (**P<0,01; ***P<0,001; ****P<0,0001). Data are mean±s.e.m (n≥6 for each time point).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Analysis of upstream regulators of sensory hair cell and otolith development. (A-D) At OEPD (five somites) and placodal stages (12 somites), otic expression of atoh1b is absent in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos in comparison with wild-type siblings. (E,F) In contrast, atoh1b can be detected in dlx3b/4b mutants at 24 hpf although limited to the anterior portion of the otic vesicle. (G-J) Similarly, atoh1a is initially not expressed in the developing otic placode of dlx3b/4b-deficient embryos but present in the future domain of the utricular macula at 24 hpf. (K-N) Compared with wild-type control, otog expression is undetectable in dlx3b/4b mutants at placodal stages and restricted to the prospective domain of the utricular macula at 24 hpf. (A-D,G,H) Dorsolateral views with anterior to the left. (E,F,I,J) Lateral views with anterior to the left. OP, otic placode. Scale bar: 40 µm.

Increased OEPD-dependent neurogenesis in dlx3b/4b mutants

Previous studies have suggested that Dlx3b/4b play important roles in OEPD-derived neurogenesis (Millimaki et al., 2007; Dee et al., 2008; Padanad and Riley, 2011; Hans et al., 2013). To address this in the newly generated dlx3b/4b mutants, we examined neurogenic differentiation 1 (neurod1), which is expressed in the anterior-ventral region of the otic vesicle, in delaminated neuroblasts as well as progenitors of the anterior lateral line ganglia, which are closely associated with the delaminated otic neuroblasts at 24 hpf (Andermann et al., 2002). In comparison with control embryos, neurod1 expression increased in the absence of Dlx3b/4b, despite smaller otic vesicles indicated by starmaker (stm) expression (Fig. 6A,B). Increased neurod1 expression in dlx3b/4b mutants is prefigured by increased levels of the proneural gene neurogenin1 (neurog1), which delineates the neurogenic placodes including progenitors of the anterior lateral line ganglion (gALL) and cells within the otic vesicle that give rise to delaminated neuroblasts (gVIII) (Andermann et al., 2002) (Fig. 6C,D). Onset of neurog1 expression, however, was unchanged and could be observed at 15 hpf similar to wild-type siblings (data not shown). To distinguish anterior lateral line progenitors and otic neuroblasts, we performed double labeling with neurod1, expressed in both lineages, and T-cell leukemia, homeobox 3b (tlx3b), which exclusively labels progenitors of anterior lateral line ganglion, but not otic neuroblasts, at 24 hpf (Langenau et al., 2002). In comparison with wild-type siblings, the majority of neurod1-labelled cells co-expressed tlx3b in dlx3b/4b mutants, indicating an increase in anterior lateral line progenitors in this genetic background (Fig. 6E,F). To examine any change in epibranchial ganglion progenitors, we analyzed the expression of paired-like homeobox 2a (phox2a) and paired-like homeobox 2bb (phox2bb), which label progenitors of the geniculate (gVII), petrosal (gIX) and nodose (gX) ganglion (Guo et al., 1999). In comparison with control siblings at 32 hpf, phox2a expression revealed that all epibranchial progenitor populations were initiated in a similar manner in both dlx3b/4b, which was confirmed by phox2bb expression at 50 hpf (Fig. 6G,H and data not shown). Taken together, these findings show that loss of Dlx3b/4b seems to result in defects in OEPD-derived neurogenesis with a potential increase in anterior lateral line ganglion progenitors. In contrast, otic and epibranchial placode neurogenesis seems to be unaffected and indistinguishable from that in the wild type in dlx3b/4b mutants.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

OEPD-dependent neurogenesis in dlx3b/4b-deficient embryos. (A,B) Expression of neurod1 (blue) in control siblings and dlx3b/4b mutants at 24 hpf. Expression of stm (red) reveals the size reduction of the otic vesicle in dlx3b/4b mutants in comparison with wild-type embryos. (C,D) Expression of neurog1 in control and dlx3b/4b mutant embryos at 24 hpf. (E,F) Double staining of neurod1 (red) and tlx3b (blue) indicates increased production of anterior lateral line ganglion progenitors in dlx3b/4b mutants compared to control siblings at 24 hpf. (G,H) At 32 hpf, phox2a expression in dlx3b/4b mutants is indistinguishable from wild-type controls. (A,B,E,F) Lateral views with anterior to the left. (C,D,G,H) Dorsal views with anterior to the left. gALL, anterior lateral line ganglion progenitor; gVII, geniculate ganglion progenitor; gVIII, statoacoustic ganglion progenitor; gIX, petrosal ganglion progenitor; gX, nodose ganglion progenitor. Scale bar: 40 µm.

DISCUSSION

Their ease of use established morpholino oligonucleotides as a highly valuable knockdown tool in zebrafish, providing insights into various developmental mechanisms including inner ear development. Because reports indicated that several morpholino-induced phenotypes might be due to non-specific effects, morpholino oligonucleotides usage guidelines were established (Eisen and Smith, 2008). However, with the ability to apply reverse genetic approaches, a growing number of discrepancies emerged even in studies that largely adhered to the published usage guidelines. In a recent comprehensive study, >70% of morpholino-induced phenotypes failed to be observed in the corresponding mutants (Kok et al., 2015). Hence, it is now suggested that morpholino oligonucleotides should be no longer be considered a stand-alone tool for elucidating gene function in zebrafish. Consequently, appropriate mutant lines need to be generated and characterized to validate morpholino-induced phenotypes.

Here, we revisited the function of Dlx3b/4b in early inner ear development using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis. Removal of the entire dlx3b and dlx4b tail-to-tail bigene cluster resulted in the introduction of a defined deletion and the generation of an unambiguous null allele. We found that the deletion of the dlx3b/4b locus confirmed almost all previously reported results obtained with morpholino-mediated knockdown, showing that the published dlx3b and dlx4b morpholinos represent a reliable knockdown tool. Only reduced expression of sox9a in the OEPD after simultaneous morpholino-mediated knockdown of Dlx3b/4b (Liu et al., 2003) could not be confirmed. However, consistent with morpholino-mediated knockdown, mutant embryos showed a delayed onset of pax2a, resulting in compromised otic induction and subsequent otic vesicle hypoplasia (Fig. 7). Furthermore, combined loss of Dlx3b/4b and the forkhead transcription factor Foxi1 eliminated all indications of otic specification as previously described (Hans et al., 2004; Solomon et al., 2004). Our analysis of dlx3b/4b mutants also confirmed a role for Dlx3b/4b in sensorigenesis (Fig. 7). Otolith formation was defective in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos due to the absence of functional early-forming sensory hair cells or tether cells. In contrast, later-forming sensory hair cells were present and formed in a Dlx3b/4b-independent manner, indicating that distinct pathways control the development of early-born and later-forming sensory hair cells in zebrafish. We also found that loss of early-born sensory hair cells in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos reverses the common temporal sequence of neuronal and sensory hair cell specification in zebrafish (Fig. 7). Together with recent results from amniotes, our results demonstrate that vertebrate inner ear development is highly conserved but also suggest that zebrafish employ an additional Dlx3b/4b-dependent pathway, which has been either newly acquired in fish or lost in other vertebrate species. We propose that differences in otic induction, otolith versus otoconia formation, and the temporal order of neuronal and sensory hair cell specification result from the activity of the Dlx3b/4b-dependent pathway in fish. Expression of members of the distal-less gene family during early inner ear development has been reported in other species (Dirksen et al., 1993; Papalopulu and Kintner, 1993; Robinson and Mahon, 1994; Brown et al., 2005), but functional analysis suggests that otic placode induction in mammals and amphibians does not require distal-less gene function (Robledo et al., 2002; Saint-Germain et al., 2004). By contrast, expression analysis and functional characterization of Foxi3 in chick and mouse suggest that the amniote Foxi3 gene is the functional homolog of zebrafish foxi1 in otic and epibranchial placode formation (Edlund et al., 2015). Knockdown of Foxi3 causes a failure of otic placode induction in chick embryos (Khatri et al., 2014). Consistently, induction of the otic placode as well as formation of the otocyst completely fail to occur in Foxi3 mutant mice (Birol et al., 2016). Furthermore, Foxi3 is necessary for the development of the neurogenic epibranchial placodes similar to the role foxi1 plays in zebrafish (Guo et al., 1999; Birol et al., 2016). Hence, in amniotes, loss of a single factor results in the complete loss of otic specification and is much more severe than changes seen in foxi1 mutant zebrafish. Here, only additional removal of the Dlx3b/4b-dependent pathway resulted in a complete block of otic development. Dlx3b/4b-dependent otic induction is required for the proper onset of atoh1b, which is necessary for the development of early-born hair cells (Millimaki et al., 2007; Hans et al., 2013). Early-born hair cells, or tether cells, are sensory hair cells that seed and localize the formation of otoliths, large solidified bio-crystals. Expression of a so-far unidentified hair cell-specific otolith precursor-binding factor is a key initiator of this process (Millimaki et al., 2007; Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2012). Consequently, in the absence of Dlx3b/4b function, early-born hair cells are lost or not properly specified, and otolith formation is completely absent. In contrast to zebrafish, other vertebrate species do not possess otoliths but rather form otoconia, minute biomineralized particles, which are anchored to the otoconial membrane atop the hair bundles (Lundberg et al., 2015). Because dlx3b/4b mutants failed to develop otoliths it would be interesting to determine if they instead form otoconia or otoconia-like structures. However, due to other defects, dlx3b/4b mutants are embryonic lethal around 5 days postfertilization, and a conditional dlx3b/4b allele will be required to address this question.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Schematic of the events during early otic development in zebrafish. In wild-type embryos, the otic placode develops into the otic vesicle with the formation of neuronal precursors/neuroblasts (purple) and sensory hair cells (light red) in a stereotypical temporal order. Sensory hair cells (1) are generated prior to the formation of neuroblasts (2). Subsequently, early-born hair cells (tether cells) seed and localize the formation of otoliths (grey). Loss of Foxi1 results in compromised otic induction and the development of smaller otic vesicles lacking the neuronal lineage. Loss of Dlx3b/4b also results in compromised otic induction and the development of smaller otic vesicles. However, otolith formation is completely abolished and the temporal order of neuronal and sensory hair cell formation is reversed. Combined loss of Dlx3b/4b and Foxi1 eliminates all indications of otic specification.

Loss of early-forming hair cells in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos reversed the temporal order of neuronal and hair cell specification. It has been reported that the order of cell specification in amniotes, Neurog1 expression prior to Atoh1 expression, is not constrained across phylogeny and that the temporal sequence of cell specification is reversed in zebrafish with atoh1b and atoh1a expression preceding neurog1 expression (Millimaki et al., 2007; Fritzsch et al., 2010; Radosevic et al., 2014; Raft and Groves, 2015). Our results now indicate that two genetically distinct pathways result in the formation of early-born and later-forming sensory hair cells, respectively. The former are atoh1b-dependent whereas the latter are mostly dependent on atoh1a, as was previously shown using morpholino-mediated knockdown of Atoh1a and Atoh1b (Millimaki et al., 2007). Loss of Atoh1b activity following atoh1b morpholino-mediated knockdown, or as shown here in dlx3b/4b mutant embryos, delays onset of atoh1a expression beyond the onset of otic neurogenesis (Millimaki et al., 2007). Taken together, lack of the Dlx3b/4b-dependent pathway in zebrafish resembles events during amniotic inner ear development with respect to otic induction, absence of otoliths and temporal order of cell specification. Currently, it is unclear if the recruitment of the Dlx3b/4b pathway in early inner ear development is a feature in the ontogenesis of zebrafish, teleosts or all fish species. The spatio-temporal analysis of Foxi1 and Dlx3b in medaka showed a large degree of conservation within the teleost lineage (Hochmann et al., 2007), but functional data are lacking. Future work will be needed to address this issue more rigorously.

In addition to its involvement in sensorigenesis, analysis of dlx3b/4b mutant embryos confirmed previous results that Dlx3b/4b participates in OEPD-dependent neurogenesis (Hans et al., 2013). These findings suggest that the early OEPD represents an equivalence group with progenitors of the inner ear and the anterior lateral line ganglion and that failure to enter the otic lineage results in the adoption of an anterior lateral line ganglion fate. In contrast, development of the third neuronal component of the OEPD, the epibranchial placodes, is unaffected by loss of Dlx3b/4b activity, supporting a model whereby the otic/anterior lateral line placodes form first followed by the subsequent induction of epibranchial placodes through an Fgf-relay (Padanad and Riley, 2011; Maulding et al., 2014).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were conducted according to the guidelines and under supervision of the Regierungspräsidium Dresden (permit AZ 24-9168.11-1/2013/29). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and the number of animals used. Heterozygous animals carrying the dlx3b/4b mutation do not show any obvious phenotype, and are indistinguishable from wild-type siblings during development and adulthood. In contrast, animals carrying the dlx3b/4b mutation in homozygosity are severely affected and highly lethargic at 120 hpf, although no gross anatomical malformations can be observed with the exception of the inner ear. Due to restrictions in our animal experimentation permits we cannot provide information about time of death and terminal phenotype because mutant larvae were always euthanized at 120 hpf.

Cas9 and gRNA construction

Cas9 mRNA and gRNAs were synthesized as recently described (Jao et al., 2013). Briefly, Cas9 mRNA was synthesized by in vitro transcription using T3 mMESSAGE mMACHINE kit (Ambion, Austin, USA). gRNAs were generated and purified using the MEGAshortscript T7 and mirVana miRNA isolation kits (Ambion), respectively. Sequences of the genomic target sites and oligonucleotides for making gRNAs are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sequences of genomic target sites and oligonucleotides for making gRNA expression constructs

graphic file with name biolopen-6-026211-i1.jpg

Zebrafish husbandry and germline transformation

Zebrafish were raised and maintained as previously described (Brand et al., 2002). Zebrafish embryos were obtained by natural spawnings of adult fish and staged according to hpf or standard criteria (Kimmel et al., 1995). The wild-type line used was AB. The transgenic line Tg(pou4f3:GAP-GFP)s356 has been described previously (Xiao et al., 2005). The mutation in foxi1 (foxi1em1) including the genotyping protocol has been described by Solomon et al. (2003). For germ line transformation, Cas9 mRNA and gRNAs were co-injected into fertilized eggs, after which embryos were raised to adulthood, crossed to AB wild-type fish and the resulting F1 embryos were screened by PCR. To detect the deletion in the dlx3b/4b locus, the primers dlx3b/4b-1f 5′-CTGCTGATCGCTAAGGTTGTCTTCTGCC-3′ and dlx3b/4b-rev 5′-CTCCAGCATTTCACCTCTTCATTATCGCCATAAC-3′ were used, which result in an amplicon of 618 bp in the presence of the deletion allele. In total, 80 animals were screened and one founder carrying the dlx3b/4b deletion allele in the germline was identified. For subsequent genotyping, the primer dlx3b/4b-2f 5′-GGAGAGTCCTTAGAAGTCGGATGGCAACTC-3′ was added, amplifying a 473 bp fragment in the presence of wild-type DNA. Genotyping of embryos demonstrated the exact concordance between homozygous mutant genotype and observed phenotype. At least 12 mutant embryos from three separate clutches were analyzed for each experiment.

In situ hybridization

cDNA probes that detect the following genes were used: dlx3b (Ekker et al., 1992), pax2a (Krauss et al., 1991), pax8 (Pfeffer et al., 1998), phox2a (Guo et al., 1999), myo7aa (Ernest et al., 2000), atoh1a (Itoh and Chitnis, 2001), neurog1 and neurod1 (Andermann et al., 2002), tlx3b (Langenau et al., 2002), sox9a (Liu et al., 2003), stm (Söllner et al., 2003), atoh1b (Adolf et al., 2004) and otog (Stooke-Vaughan et al., 2015). Probe synthesis and in situ hybridization were performed essentially as previously described (Westerfield, 2000).

Image acquisition, processing and statistical analysis

Images were acquired with a MVX10 microscope (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany), Axio Imager Z1 and Axiophot 2 microscope (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany), and SP5 confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) (in the light microscopy facility of the BIOTEC/CRTD at Technische Universität Dresden). All images shown are representatives of a fully penetrant phenotype. Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop or Fiji (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) and compiled with Adobe Illustrator.

The collected data were normally distributed and plotted as mean±s.e.m. Statistical significance was assessed using Mann–Whitney test in GraphPad Prism (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001). The sample size was ≥6 for each sensory patch.

Acknowledgements

We thank Theresa Rändler, a former pupil of the Martin-Andersen-Nexö-Gymnasium in Dresden, who participated in the establishment of the dlx3b/4b mutant line in the context of a Besondere Lernleistung (BeLL). We also thank past and present members of the Brand laboratory for discussions; Dr Monte Westerfield (University of Oregon), Dr Kate Barald (University of Michigan) and Dr Iris Steinebrunner for comments on the manuscript; and Marika Fischer, Jitka Michling, Claudia Meyer and Daniela Mögel for dedicated zebrafish care. This work was supported by the Light Microscopy Facility, a core facility of BIOTEC/CRTD at the Technische Universität Dresden.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: S.H.; Investigation: S. Schwarzer, S. Spieß, S.H.; Resources: S. Spieß, M.B., S.H.; Writing - original draft: S. Schwarzer, S.H.; Writing - review & editing: S. Spieß, M.B., S.H.; Visualization: S. Schwarzer; Project administration: S.H.; Funding acquisition: M.B., S.H.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB655 and HA 6362/1-1), Technische Universität Dresden (Support-the-Best grant to M.B.) and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 225094).

References

  1. Adolf B., Bellipanni G., Huber V. and Bally-Cuif L. (2004). atoh1.2 and beta3.1 are two new bHLH-encoding genes expressed in selective precursor cells of the zebrafish anterior hindbrain. Gene Expr. Patterns 5, 35-41. 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez Y., Alonso M. T., Vendrell V., Zelarayan L. C., Chamero P., Theil T., Bösl M. R., Kato S., Maconochie M., Riethmacher D. et al. (2003). Requirements for FGF3 and FGF10 during inner ear formation. Development 130, 6329-6338. 10.1242/dev.00881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andermann P., Ungos J. and Raible D. W. (2002). Neurogenin1 defines zebrafish cranial sensory ganglia precursors. Dev. Biol. 251, 45-58. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barald K. F. and Kelley M. W. (2004). From placode to polarization: new tunes in inner ear development. Development 131, 4119-4130. 10.1242/dev.01339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bermingham N. A., Hassan B. A., Price S. D., Vollrath M. A., Ben-Arie N., Eatock R. A., Bellen H. J., Lysakowski A. and Zoghbi H. Y. (1999). Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284, 1837-1841. 10.1126/science.284.5421.1837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bill B. R., Petzold A. M., Clark K. J., Schimmenti L. A. and Ekker S. C. (2009). A primer for morpholino use in zebrafish. Zebrafish 6, 69-77. 10.1089/zeb.2008.0555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Birol O., Ohyama T., Edlund R. K., Drakou K., Georgiades P. and Groves A. K. (2016). The mouse Foxi3 transcription factor is necessary for the development of posterior placodes. Dev. Biol. 409, 139-151. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.09.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boer E. F., Jette C. A. and Stewart R. A. (2016). Neural crest migration and survival are susceptible to morpholino-induced artifacts. PLoS ONE 11, e0167278 10.1371/journal.pone.0167278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brand M., Granato M. and Nüsslein-Volhard C. (2002). Keeping and raising zebrafish. In Zebrafish, A Practical Approach (ed. Nüsslein-Volhard C. and Dahm R.), pp. 7-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown S. T., Wang J. and Groves A. K. (2005). Dlx gene expression during chick inner ear development. J. Comp. Neurol. 483, 48-65. 10.1002/cne.20418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen J. and Streit A. (2013). Induction of the inner ear: stepwise specification of otic fate from multipotent progenitors. Hear. Res. 297, 3-12. 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dee C. T., Hirst C. S., Shih Y.-H., Tripathi V. B., Patient R. K. and Scotting P. J. (2008). Sox3 regulates both neural fate and differentiation in the zebrafish ectoderm. Dev. Biol. 320, 289-301. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dirksen M.-L., Mathers P. and Jamrich M. (1993). Expression of a Xenopus Distal-less homeobox gene involved in forebrain and cranio-facial development. Mech. Dev. 41, 121-128. 10.1016/0925-4773(93)90042-V [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edlund R. K., Birol O. and Groves A. K. (2015). Chapter fourteen – the role of Foxi family transcription factors in the development of the ear and jaw. In Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Vol. 111 (ed. Paul A. T.), pp. 461-495. London: Academic Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisen J. S. and Smith J. C. (2008). Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense. Development 135, 1735-1743. 10.1242/dev.001115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekker M., Akimenko M.-A., Bremiller R. and Westerfield M. (1992). Regional expression of three homeobox transcripts in the inner ear of zebrafish embryos. Neuron 9, 27-35. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90217-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ernest S., Rauch G.-J., Haffter P., Geisler R., Petit C. and Nicolson T. (2000). Mariner is defective in myosin VIIA: a zebrafish model for human hereditary deafness. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 2189-2196. 10.1093/hmg/9.14.2189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Freter S., Muta Y., Mak S.-S., Rinkwitz S. and Ladher R. K. (2008). Progressive restriction of otic fate: the role of FGF and Wnt in resolving inner ear potential. Development 135, 3415-3424. 10.1242/dev.026674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fritzsch B., Eberl D. F. and Beisel K. W. (2010). The role of bHLH genes in ear development and evolution: revisiting a 10-year-old hypothesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 3089-3099. 10.1007/s00018-010-0403-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo S., Brush J., Teraoka H., Goddard A., Wilson S. W., Mullins M. C. and Rosenthal A. (1999). Development of noradrenergic neurons in the zebrafish hindbrain requires BMP, FGF8, and the homeodomain protein soulless/Phox2a. Neuron 24, 555-566. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81112-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haddon C. and Lewis J. (1996). Early ear development in the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J. Comp. Neurol. 365, 113-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hans S., Liu D. and Westerfield M. (2004). Pax8 and Pax2a function synergistically in otic specification, downstream of the Foxi1 and Dlx3b transcription factors. Development 131, 5091-5102. 10.1242/dev.01346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hans S., Irmscher A. and Brand M. (2013). Zebrafish Foxi1 provides a neuronal ground state during inner ear induction preceding the Dlx3b/4b-regulated sensory lineage. Development 140, 1936-1945. 10.1242/dev.087718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hochmann S., Aghaallaei N., Bajoghli B., Soroldoni D., Carl M. and Czerny T. (2007). Expression of marker genes during early ear development in medaka. Gene Expr. Patterns 7, 355-362. 10.1016/j.modgep.2006.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Itoh M. and Chitnis A. B. (2001). Expression of proneural and neurogenic genes in the zebrafish lateral line primordium correlates with selection of hair cell fate in neuromasts. Mech. Dev. 102, 263-266. 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00308-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jao L.-E., Wente S. R. and Chen W. (2013). Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13904-13909. 10.1073/pnas.1308335110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Khatri S. B., Edlund R. K. and Groves A. K. (2014). Foxi3 is necessary for the induction of the chick otic placode in response to FGF signaling. Dev. Biol. 391, 158-169. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.04.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kimmel C. B., Ballard W. W., Kimmel S. R., Ullmann B. and Schilling T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203, 253-310. 10.1002/aja.1002030302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kok F. O., Shin M., Ni C.-W., Gupta A., Grosse A. S., van Impel A., Kirchmaier B. C., Peterson-Maduro J., Kourkoulis G., Male I. et al. (2015). Reverse genetic screening reveals poor correlation between morpholino-induced and mutant phenotypes in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 32: 97-108. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krauss S., Johansen T., Korzh V. and Fjose A. (1991). Expression of the zebrafish paired box gene pax[zf-b] during early neurogenesis. Development 113, 1193-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ladher R. K. (2017). Changing shape and shaping change: Inducing the inner ear. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 65, 39-46. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ladher R. K., Wright T. J., Moon A. M., Mansour S. L. and Schoenwolf G. C. (2005). FGF8 initiates inner ear induction in chick and mouse. Genes Dev. 19, 603-613. 10.1101/gad.1273605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Langenau D. M., Palomero T., Kanki J. P., Ferrando A. A., Zhou Y., Zon L. I. and Look A. T. (2002). Molecular cloning and developmental expression of Tlx (Hox11) genes in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Mech. Dev. 117, 243-248. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00187-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Léger S. and Brand M. (2002). Fgf8 and Fgf3 are required for zebrafish ear placode induction, maintenance and inner ear patterning. Mech. Dev. 119, 91-108. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00343-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu D., Chu H., Maves L., Yan Y.-L., Morcos P. A., Postlethwait J. H. and Westerfield M. (2003). Fgf3 and Fgf8 dependent and independent transcription factors are required for otic placode specification. Development 130, 2213-2224. 10.1242/dev.00445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lundberg Y. W., Xu Y., Thiessen K. D. and Kramer K. L. (2015). Mechanisms of otoconia and otolith development. Dev. Dyn. 244, 239-253. 10.1002/dvdy.24195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ma Q., Chen Z., Barrantes I. B., Luis de la Pompa J. and Anderson D. J. (1998). neurogenin1 is essential for the determination of neuronal precursors for proximal cranial sensory ganglia. Neuron 20, 469-482. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80988-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Maroon H., Walshe J., Mahmood R., Kiefer P., Dickson C. and Mason I. (2002). Fgf3 and Fgf8 are required together for formation of the otic placode and vesicle. Development 129, 2099-2108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Maulding K., Padanad M. S., Dong J. and Riley B. B. (2014). Mesodermal Fgf10b cooperates with other fibroblast growth factors during induction of otic and epibranchial placodes in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 243, 1275-1285. 10.1002/dvdy.24119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. McCarroll M. N., Lewis Z. R., Culbertson M. D., Martin B. L., Kimelman D. and Nechiporuk A. V. (2012). Graded levels of Pax2a and Pax8 regulate cell differentiation during sensory placode formation. Development 139, 2740-2750. 10.1242/dev.076075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Millimaki B. B., Sweet E. M., Dhason M. S. and Riley B. B. (2007). Zebrafish atoh1 genes: classic proneural activity in the inner ear and regulation by Fgf and Notch. Development 134, 295-305. 10.1242/dev.02734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nissen R. M., Yan J., Amsterdam A., Hopkins N. and Burgess S. M. (2003). Zebrafish foxi one modulates cellular responses to Fgf signaling required for the integrity of ear and jaw patterning. Development 130, 2543-2554. 10.1242/dev.00455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Novodvorsky P., Watson O., Gray C., Wilkinson R. N., Reeve S., Smythe C., Beniston R., Plant K., Maguire R., Rothman A. M. K. et al. (2015). klf2ash317 mutant zebrafish do not recapitulate morpholino-induced vascular and haematopoietic phenotypes. PLoS ONE 10, e0141611 10.1371/journal.pone.0141611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Padanad M. S. and Riley B. B. (2011). Pax2/8 proteins coordinate sequential induction of otic and epibranchial placodes through differential regulation of foxi1, sox3 and fgf24. Dev. Biol. 351, 90-98. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.12.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Papalopulu N. and Kintner C. (1993). Xenopus Distal-less related homeobox genes are expressed in the developing forebrain and are induced by planar signals. Development 117, 961-975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pfeffer P. L., Gerster T., Lun K., Brand M. and Busslinger M. (1998). Characterization of three novel members of the zebrafish Pax2/5/8 family: dependency of Pax5 and Pax8 expression on the Pax2.1 (noi) function. Development 125, 3063-3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Phillips B. T., Bolding K. and Riley B. B. (2001). Zebrafish fgf3 and fgf8 encode redundant functions required for otic placode induction. Dev. Biol. 235, 351-365. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Radosevic M., Fargas L. and Alsina B. (2014). The role of her4 in inner ear development and its relationship with proneural genes and notch signalling. PLoS ONE 9, e109860 10.1371/journal.pone.0109860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Raft S. and Groves A. K. (2015). Segregating neural and mechanosensory fates in the developing ear: patterning, signaling, and transcriptional control. Cell Tissue Res. 359, 315-332. 10.1007/s00441-014-1917-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Riley B. B., Zhu C., Janetopoulos C. and Aufderheide K. J. (1997). A critical period of ear development controlled by distinct populations of ciliated cells in the zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 191, 191-201. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Robinson G. W. and Mahon K. A. (1994). Differential and overlapping expression domains of Dlx-2 and Dlx-3 suggest distinct roles for Distal-less homeobox genes in craniofacial development. Mech. Dev. 48, 199-215. 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90060-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Robledo R. F., Rajan L., Li X. and Lufkin T. (2002). The Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes are essential for craniofacial, axial, and appendicular skeletal development. Genes Dev. 16, 1089-1101. 10.1101/gad.988402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rubel E. W. and Fritzsch B. (2002). Auditory system development: primary auditory neurons and their targets. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 51-101. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Saint-Germain N., Lee Y.-H., Zhang Y., Sargent T. D. and Saint-Jeannet J.-P. (2004). Specification of the otic placode depends on Sox9 function in Xenopus. Development 131, 1755-1763. 10.1242/dev.01066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Söllner C., Burghammer M., Busch-Nentwich E., Berger J., Schwarz H., Riekel C. and Nicolson T. (2003). Control of crystal size and lattice formation by starmaker in otolith biomineralization. Science 302, 282-286. 10.1126/science.1088443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Solomon K. S. and Fritz A. (2002). Concerted action of two dlx paralogs in sensory placode formation. Development 129, 3127-3136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Solomon K. S., Kudoh T., Dawid I. B. and Fritz A. (2003). Zebrafish foxi1 mediates otic placode formation and jaw development. Development 130, 929-940. 10.1242/dev.00308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Solomon K. S., Kwak S.-J. and Fritz A. (2004). Genetic interactions underlying otic placode induction and formation. Dev. Dyn. 230, 419-433. 10.1002/dvdy.20067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Stooke-Vaughan G. A., Huang P., Hammond K. L., Schier A. F. and Whitfield T. T. (2012). The role of hair cells, cilia and ciliary motility in otolith formation in the zebrafish otic vesicle. Development 139, 1777-1787. 10.1242/dev.079947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stooke-Vaughan G. A., Obholzer N. D., Baxendale S., Megason S. G. and Whitfield T. T. (2015). Otolith tethering in the zebrafish otic vesicle requires Otogelin and α-Tectorin. Development 142, 1137-1145. 10.1242/dev.116632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Streit A. (2007). The preplacodal region: an ectodermal domain with multipotential progenitors that contribute to sense organs and cranial sensory ganglia. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 51, 447-461. 10.1387/ijdb.072327as [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Westerfield M. (2000). The Zebrafish Book. A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio), 4th edn Eugene: University of Oregon Press. [Google Scholar]
  63. Whitfield T. T. (2015). Development of the inner ear. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 32, 112-118. 10.1016/j.gde.2015.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wright T. J. and Mansour S. L. (2003). Fgf3 and Fgf10 are required for mouse otic placode induction. Development 130, 3379-3390. 10.1242/dev.00555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiao T., Roeser T., Staub W. and Baier H. (2005). A GFP-based genetic screen reveals mutations that disrupt the architecture of the zebrafish retinotectal projection. Development 132, 2955-2967. 10.1242/dev.01861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yamanishi E., Takahashi M., Saga Y. and Osumi N. (2012). Penetration and differentiation of cephalic neural crest-derived cells in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev. Growth Differ. 54, 785-800. 10.1111/dgd.12007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biology Open are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES