Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 25;7:12279. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12478-1

Concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 is associated with aggressive behaviors of papillary thyroid carcinomas

Yu-Jie Dai 1,#, Yi-Bo Qiu 1,#, Rong Jiang 2, Man Xu 2, Le Zhao 1, George G Chen 3, Zhi-Min Liu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5612999  PMID: 28947799

Abstract

ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 mRNA and protein expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) were examined by real time RT-PCR and immunohistochemical staining. The mRNA and protein expression of ERα and PR were gradually increased and those of ERβ were gradually decreased from normal thyroid tissues to nodular hyperplasias (P < 0.05) and to PTCs (P < 0.05). However, the mRNA and protein expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 were only significantly increased in PTCs when compared with those in normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.001) and nodular hyperplasias (P < 0.001). There was some correlation between ERα, ERβ and PR, and between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression in PTCs. As for ERα, ERβ and PR, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα and PR, and a significant negative correlation between ERα and ERβ and between PR and ERβ protein expression. As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression in PTCs. Concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 was strongly associated with aggressive behaviors including extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node metastasis (LNM) and high TNM stage in PTCs (P < 0.001).

Introduction

Clinical and epidemiological studies have shown that papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) accounts for 80% of thyroid malignancy and is three times more common in women than in men, with the greatest gender difference observed during reproductive age and the decreased incidence after menopause1,2. The elevated risk was reported in women who used estrogen for gynecological problems3,4. These data strongly suggest that estrogen may be involved in the occurrence and development of PTC, as largely demonstrated in breast, endometrial and ovarian carcinomas5.

It is well known that estrogen manifests its physiologic and pathophysiologic actions through its interaction with two estrogen receptors, ERα and ERβ, which belong to the nuclear steroid hormone receptor family and function as hormone-dependent transcription factors to induce transactivation of a series of estrogen-dependent target genes6,7. Progesterone receptor (PR) is a paragon of estrogen-induced protein and is employed as a biomarker of ERα function and breast cancer prognosis8–10. However, there is increasing evidence demonstrating that estrogen also acts via plasma membrane receptor(s). One of the key candidates for the membrane mediated action of estrogen is a novel 36 kDa variant of full-length (66 kDa) ERα and is designated as ERα36. Compared with ERα, ERα36 retains DNA-binding, partial dimerization and ligand-binding domains but lacks both transcriptional activation domains (AF-1 and AF-2)11,12. The C-terminal 27-amino acid domain of ERα36 is unique and takes the place of the last 138 amino acids encoded by exon 7 and 8 of the ERα gene. This unique sequence may broaden the ligand-binding spectrum of ERα36 so that it is able to bind more ligands. In addition to estrogen, ERα36 also binds tamoxifen and fulvestrant, two ER inhibitors widely used in the clinic, which creates an agonistic response and is involved in resistance to classical endocrine therapy in estrogen-related cancers13,14. ERα36 mainly locates in the cytoplasm, as well as on the cell surface where it mediates non-genomic estrogen signaling through cross-talk with growth factor receptors and other signaling molecules (such as MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT and PKC) and promotes cell growth, invasion, migration and resistance to endocrine therapy13–17. High expression of ERα36 has been observed in breast cancer stem cells18–21, ER-positive and -negative human breast carcinomas22, endometrial carcinomas23 and gastric carcinomas24, which has shown to be associated with malignancy, invasion, metastasis, resistance to treatment and poor prognosis in these types of carcinomas. However, so far, no study dealt with ERα36 expression and its correlation with clinicopathological features of PTC.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its family members are a group of receptor tyrosine kinases on cell surface. Signaling occurs through both homo- and hetero-dimerization between members of the family, which induce cell proliferation, motility and invasion25. Interestingly, the preferred dimer partner of EGFR is the family member HER2 (also called EGFR2)26. The overexpression of EGFR and HER2 is frequently found in a variety of human malignancies such as breast27, endometrial28, colon29, gastric30 and papillary thyroid carcinomas31,32, and high expression of EGFR and HER2 occurs at an advanced stage of malignancy characterized by metastatic competence and poor prognosis.

In this study, we will simultaneously examine ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 expression in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues by using real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemical staining, systematically assess the association of their expression with clinicopathological features and evaluate the potential usefulness of these molecules in prediction for aggressive behaviors of PTCs.

Results

mRNA expression of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues

To compare gene expression of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues, 10 PTCs, 10 nodular hyperplasias and 10 normal thyroid tissues were collected to detect the mRNA levels of these molecules using real-time RT-PCR. As shown in Table 1, ERα, ERβ and PR mRNA were expressed in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues. ERα and PR mRNA levels were significantly higher in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias (P < 0.001 for both ERα and PR) and normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.001 for both ERα and PR). However, ERβ mRNA level was significantly lower in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias (P < 0.001) and normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.001). Furthermore, nodular hyperplasias had higher ERα and PR and lower ERβ mRNA levels when compared with normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.001 for ERα, ERβ and PR). These results indicated that ERα and PR mRNA levels were gradually increased and ERβ mRNA level was gradually decreased from normal thyroid tissues to nodular hyperplasias and to PTCs. As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, the mRNA levels of the three molecules were significantly higher in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias (P < 0.001 for ERα36, EGFR and HER2) and normal thyroid tissues (P < 0.001 for ERα36, EGFR and HER2). There were no statistically significant differences in mRNA levels of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 between nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues (P = 0.137, 0.117, 0.157 for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, respectively). These results indicated that increased mRNA expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 was only associated with the occurrence of PTC, but not with that of nodular hyperplasia.

Table 1.

mRNA expression of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues.

Groups(n = 10) ERα (ΔCT, P value) ERβ (ΔCT, P value) PR (ΔCT, P value) ERα36 (ΔCT, P value) EGFR (ΔCT, P value) HER2 (ΔCT, P value)
Normal thyroid tissues 4.15 ± 0.82 28.37 ± 4.87 4.46 ± 0.95 1.50 ± 0.28 1.78 ± 0.47 1.93 ± 0.43
Nodular hyperplasias 15.53 ± 3.95(<0.001a) 18.21 ± 4.92(<0.001a) 16.54 ± 5.20(<0.001a) 1.73 ± 0.35(0.137a) 2.15 ± 0.52(0.117a) 2.29 ± 0.64(0.157a)
PTCs 28.72 ± 5.16(<0.001b) 8.85 ± 2.13(<0.001b) 29.26 ± 8.21(<0.001b) 32.39 ± 6.65(<0.001b) 36.52 ± 7.01(<0.001b) 38.40 ± 7.13(<0.001b)
(<0.001c) (<0.001c) (0.001c) (<0.001c) (<0.001c) (<0.001c)
Open in a new tab

Mean ± SD of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 mRNA expression in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues after normalization to GAPDH. P-values derived using Mann-Whitney U test; aStands for significant difference between normal thyroid tissues and nodular hyperplasias; bStands for significant difference between PTCs and normal thyroid tissues; cStands for significant difference between PTCs and nodular hyperplasias; P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Immunohistochemical expression of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues

ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression were examined by immunohistochemical staining and the representatives of immunostaining for the six molecules were illustrated in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1, ERα, ERβ and PR protein were expressed in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues. Compared with normal thyroid tissues and nodular hyperplasias, PTCs had more follicular epithelial cells with staining for ERα and PR, however, less for ERβ. Furthermore, nodular hyperplasias had more follicular epithelial cells with staining for ERα and PR, however, less for ERβ when compared with normal thyroid tissues. As shown in Tables 2 and 3, in PTCs, high expression (≥5) was present in 109 (50%), 33 (15.1%) and 116 (53.2%) of 218 cases for ERα, ERβ and PR, respectively. High expression rates of ERα and PR were significantly higher in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias (37.2%, P = 0.014 and 39.7%, P = 0.010 for ERα and PR, respectively) and normal thyroid tissues (6.3%, P < 0.001 and 8.6%, P < 0.001 for ERα and PR, respectively). However, high expression rate of ERβ was significantly lower in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias (42.3%, P < 0.001) and normal thyroid tissues (56%, P < 0.001). Obviously, nodular hyperplasias had higher rates of high ERα and PR expression (P < 0.001 for both ERα and PR) and lower rate of high ERβ expression (P = 0.013) when compared with normal thyroid tissues. As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, there were almost no follicular epithelial cells with staining for ERα36, EGFR and HER2 in normal thyroid tissues and nodular hyperplasias. However, in PTCs, there were a lot of follicular epithelial cells with staining for the three molecules. As shown in Table 2, like normal thyroid tissues, the majority of nodular hyperplasias had negative or 1 IHC score for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, no cases showed high expression (≥5) of the three molecules. However, in PTCs, the majority of cases had ≥2 IHC score for the three molecules, high expression (≥5) was present in 112 (51.4%), 132 (60.6%) and 135 (61.9%) of 218 cases for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, respectively. The differences in ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression between PTCs and normal thyroid tissues as well nodular hyperplasias were statistically significant (P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Immunohistochemical staining for ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2. Columns correspond to immunostaining for ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2, respectively. The first row (a–f) shows the representatives of immunostaining for normal thyroid tissues. The second row (g–l) displays the representatives of immunostaining for nodular hyperplasias. The third row (m–r) shows the representatives of immunostaining for PTCs. All the pictures are in high-power fields (×400).

Table 2.

Immunohistochemical analysis of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 expression in 218 PTCs, 156 nodular hyperplasias and 175 normal thyroid tissues according to the scoring system.

Score ERα ERβ PR ERα36 EGFR HER2
Normal Nodular PTCs Normal Nodular PTCs Normal Nodular PTCs Normal Nodular PTCs Normal Nodular PTCs Normal Nodular PTCs
thyroid tissues hyper-plasias thyroid tissues hyper-plasias thyroid tissues hyper-plasias thyroid tissues hyper-plasias thyroid tissues hyper-plasias thyroid tissues hyper-plasia
(n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n)
0
Negative 99 15 6 3 4 16 95 12 4 143 103 9 146 102 5 147 105 5
+
1 21 11 14 7 12 33 25 14 16 28 51 14 24 50 12 26 48 10
2 16 22 16 11 19 61 14 20 21 4 2 20 5 4 15 2 3 14
3 17 27 32 27 23 47 14 22 25 0 0 31 0 0 26 0 0 25
4 11 23 41 29 32 28 12 26 36 0 0 32 0 0 28 0 0 29
++
6 7 19 46 35 39 17 10 33 32 0 0 32 0 0 36 0 0 39
8 3 15 32 43 20 15 5 27 43 0 0 34 0 0 38 0 0 36
+++
9 1 15 18 11 4 1 0 2 26 0 0 30 0 0 37 0 0 37
12 0 9 13 9 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 16 0 0 21 0 0 23
Open in a new tab

The immunohistochemical scores in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues were determined as the multiplication of proportion score and intensity score.

Table 3.

Correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with clinicopathological parameters in 218 PTCs.

Characteristics Case (n) ERα ERβ PR ERα36 EGFR HER2
Low High P value Low High P value Low High P value Low High P value Low High P value Low High P value
Tissue type
Normal thyroid tissues 175 164 11 77 98 160 15 175 0 175 0 175 0
Nodular hyperplasias 156 98 58 <0.001a 90 66 0.013a 94 62 <0.001a 156 0 — 156 0 — 156 0 —
PTCs 218 109 109 <0.001b 185 33 <0.001b 102 116 <0.001b 106 112 <0.001b 86 132 <0.001b 83 135 <0.001b
0.014c <0.001c 0.010c <0.001c <0.001c <0.001c
Classic PTCs 135 62 73 0.193 118 17 0.129 56 79 0.183 73 62 0.230 61 74 0.160 59 76 0.166
Follicular Variant of PTCs 36 17 19 26 10 18 18 15 21 12 24 11 25
Tall Cell Variant of PTCs 26 16 10 22 4 15 11 10 16 7 19 8 18
Oncocytic Variant of PTCs 21 14 7 19 2 13 8 8 13 6 15 5 16
Age (years)
<45 60 35 25 0.129 48 12 0.217 32 28 0.233 34 26 0.143 28 32 0.179 27 33 0.194
≥45 158 74 84 137 21 70 88 72 86 58 100 56 102
Gender
Male 54 22 32 0.117 43 11 0.216 21 33 0.180 30 24 0.240 26 28 0.132 25 29 0.151
Female 164 87 77 142 22 81 83 76 88 60 104 58 106
Tumor size (cm)
T1 ≤ 2 85 66 19 <0.001 64 21 <0.001 55 30 <0.001 48 37 0.150 38 47 0.175 37 48 0.143
2 < T2 ≤ 4 81 34 47 69 12 36 45 37 44 33 48 32 49
T3 > 4 52 9 43 52 0 11 41 21 31 15 37 14 38
ETE
Absent 170 89 81 0.191 141 29 0.136 84 86 0.144 106 64 <0.001 86 84 <0.001 83 87 <0.001
Present 48 20 28 44 4 18 30 0 48 0 48 0 48
LNM
Absent 113 63 50 0.078 92 21 0.141 58 55 0.164 86 27 <0.001 73 40 <0.001 73 40 <0.001
Present 105 46 59 93 12 44 61 20 85 13 92 10 95
TNM stage
I-II 111 60 51 0.223 90 21 0.113 58 53 0.100 84 27 <0.001 74 37 <0.001 73 38 <0.001
III-IV 107 49 58 95 12 44 63 22 85 12 95 10 97
Open in a new tab

P-values derived using Chi-square test to compare the expression of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 between subgroups defined by each clinicopathological parameter; astands for significant difference between normal thyroid tissues and nodular hyperplasias; bstands for significant difference between PTCs and normal thyroid tissues; cstands for significant difference between PTCs and nodular hyperplasias. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with clinicopathological features in PTCs

The correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with clinicopathological features was assessed by Chi-square test and summarized in Table 3. ERα and PR protein expression were positively correlated and ERβ protein expression was negatively correlated with tumor size (P < 0.001 for ERα, PR and ERβ), whereas the protein expression of them was not correlated with the other clinicopathological features analyzed. Notably, ERα36 protein expression was significantly correlated with ETE (P < 0.001), LNM (P < 0.001) and TNM stage (P < 0.001). PTCs with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage (III–IV) had higher rates of high ERα36 protein expression. However, there were no statistically significant differences in ERα36 protein expression between patients with different histologic subtype (P = 0.230), between older (≥45) and younger (<45) patients (P = 0.143), between male and female patients (P = 0.240), and between patients with large and small tumor size (P = 0.150). As for the two epidermal growth factor receptors, EGFR and HER2, no correlation was found to be present between the protein expression of the two molecules and histologic subtype, age, gender and tumor size of PTC patients (P = 0.160, 0.179, 0.132, 0.175 for EGFR and P = 0.166, 0.194, 0.151, 0.143 for HER2, respectively). However, EGFR and HER2 protein expression were significantly correlated with ETE (P < 0.001), LNM (P < 0.001) and TNM stage (P < 0.001). PTCs with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage (III-IV) had higher rates of high EGFR and HER2 protein expression than those with low TNM stage (I–II) and without ETE and LNM.

Correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with one another in PTCs

The correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with one another in PTCs was assessed by Spearman rank test. As shown in Table 4, there was no correlation between the protein expression of ERα, ERβ or PR and the protein expression of ERα36, EGFR or HER2. However, there was some correlation between ERα, ERβ and PR protein expression, and between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression. As for ERα, ERβ and PR, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα and PR protein expression (rs = 0.607, P < 0.001) and a significant negative correlation between ERα and ERβ protein expression (rs = −0.294, P < 0.001) and between PR and ERβ protein expression (rs = −0.245, P < 0.001). As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα36 and EGFR (rs = 0.285, P < 0.001), between ERα36 and HER2 (rs = 0.352, P < 0.001) and between EGFR and HER2 (rs = 0.160, P = 0.018) protein expression.

Table 4.

Correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with one another in 218 PTCs.

Proteins ERα ERβ PR ERα36 EGFR
Low High r s P value Low High r s P value Low High r s P value Low High rs P value Low High r s P value
ERβ
Low 81 104 −0.294 <0.001
High 28 5
PR
Low 84 18 0.607 <0.001 77 25 −0.245 <0.001
High 25 91 108 8
ERα36
Low 57 49 0.073 0.280 86 20 −0.101 0.136 55 51 0.099 0.144
High 52 60 99 13 47 65
EGFR
Low 48 38 0.094 0.167 69 17 −0.104 0.125 44 42 0.071 0.298 57 29 0.285 <0.001
High 61 71 116 16 58 74 49 83
HER2
Low 47 36 0.104 0.126 67 16 −0.091 0.183 42 41 0.060 0.379 59 24 0.352 <0.001 41 42 0.160 0.018
High 62 73 118 17 60 75 47 88 45 90
Open in a new tab

P-values for Spearman rank test; ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 were tested pairwise. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Association of concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage in PTCs

Given that ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression were positively correlated with one another and statistical analysis showed that PTCs with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage had higher rates of high protein expression of the three molecules than those with low TNM stage and without ETE and LNM, we further evaluated the association of ETE, LNM and high TNM stage with concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2. As shown in Table 5, there were 79 PTCs showing concomitant high expression of the three molecules, including 78 with high TNM stage and 1 with low TNM stage, 77 with LNM and 2 without LNM, 48 with ETE (all of PTCs with ETE) and 31 without ETE, respectively. The incidence of high TNM stage, LNM and ETE was significantly higher in patients with ERα36 high expression combined with both EGFR and HER2 high expression (98.7% for high TNM stage, 97.5% for LNM and 63.2% for ETE, respectively) than in those patients with ERα36 high expression combined with either EGFR or HER2 high expression (50.0%, 55.6% for high TNM stage, 50.0%, 55.6% for LNM and 0% for ETE, respectively), than in those patients with only ERα36 high expression (5.0% for high TNM stage, 5.0% for LNM and 0% for ETE, respectively), and than in those patients without high expression of any of the three molecules (0% for high TNM stage, LNM and ETE). Obviously, concomitant high expression of all the three molecules was significantly associated with high TNM stage, LNM and ETE when compared with cases not showing such expression (P < 0.001). As demonstrated in Fig. 2, a-c is a representative of PTC with TNM stage I and without ETE and LNM showing low expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2; d-f is a representative of PTC with TNM stage IV, ETE and LNM showing high expression of all the three molecules, ERα36, EGFR and HER2, respectively. When the concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 was used as a predictive indicator for high TNM stage, LNM and ETE, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were 72.9%, 99.1%, 98.7%, 79.1%, 86.2% for high TNM stage, 73.3%, 98.2%, 97.5%, 79.9%, 86.2% for LNM and 100.0%, 81.8%, 63.2%, 100.0%, 85.8% for ETE, respectively.

Table 5.

Correlation of concomitant expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 with ETE, LNM and TNM stage.

ETE LNM TNM stage
Absent n (%) Present n (%) P value Absent n (%) Present n (%) P value I–II n (%) III–IV n (%) P value
Expression information
(1) All of ERα36/EGFR/HER2 low expression 21 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001a 21 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001a 21 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001a
(2) ERα36 high expression; EGFR/HER2 low expression 20 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001b 19 (95.0) 1 (5.0) <0.001b 19 (95.0) 1 (5.0) <0.001b
(3) EGFR high expression; ERα36/ HER2 low expression 38 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001c 31 (81.6) 7 (18.4) <0.001c 31 (81.6) 7 (18.4) <0.001c
(4) HER2 high expression; ERα36/EGFR low expression 36 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001d 29 (80.6) 7 (19.4) <0.001d 30 (83.3) 6 (16.7) <0.001d
(5) ERα36/EGFR high expression; HER2 low expression 4 (100.0) 0 (0) 0.016e 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) 0.001e 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) <0.001e
(6) ERα36/HER2 high expression; EGFR low expression 9 (100.0) 0 (0) 0.001f 4 (44.4) 5 (55.6) <0.001f 4 (44.4) 5 (55.6) <0.001f
(7) EGFR/HER2 high expression; ERα36 low expression 11 (100.0) 0 (0) <0.001g 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5) <0.001g 3 (27.3) 8 (72.7) <0.001g
(8) All of ERα36/EGFR/HER2 high expression 31 (36.8) 48 (63.2) <0.001h 2 (2.5) 77 (97.5) <0.001h 1 (1.3) 78 (98.7) <0.001h
Evaluation index (Concomitant high expression of ERα36/EGFR/HER2) Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%)
Sensitivity 100.0 73.3 72.9
Specificity 81.8 98.2 99.1
Positive predictive value(PPV) 63.2 97.5 98.7
Negative predictive value(NPV) 100.0 79.9 79.1
Diagnostic accuracy 85.8 86.2 86.2
Open in a new tab

Correlation of concomitant expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 with ETE, LNM and TNM stage was measured by Chi-square test. a–gStand for significant differences between group (1)‒(7) and group (8), respectively; hstands for significant difference between groups with and without concomitant high expression of all the three molecules. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Association of concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage in PTCs. Columns correspond to immunostaining for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, respectively. The first row is the immunostaining of a representative of PTC with TNM stage I and without ETE and LNM showing low expression of ERα36 (a), EGFR (b) and HER2 (c). The second row is the immunostaining of a representative of PTC with TNM stage IV, ETE and LNM showing high expression of ERα36 (d), EGFR (e) and HER2 (f). All the pictures are in high-power fields (×400).

Discussion

Clinical and epidemiological studies have suggested that estrogen may be involved in the occurrence and development of PTC1–4, as largely demonstrated in breast, endometrial and ovarian carcinomas5. It is widely accepted that estrogen acts via ERα and ERβ, both of which function indisputably as hormone-dependent transcription factors to induce transactivation of a series of estrogen-dependent target genes6,7. PR is a paragon of estrogen-induced protein and its presence is a marker of a functional ERα8,9. Traditionally, ERα and PR expression are employed as biomarkers of endocrine therapy sensitivity and prognosis in breast cancer10. However, in the past 10 years, ERα36 (a novel 36 kDa variant of ERα) has been identified as a new member of the ER family and was found to be mainly located in the cytoplasm, as well as on the cell surface where it mediates non-genomic estrogen signaling through cross-talk with growth factor receptors and other signaling molecules (such as MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT and PKC) and promotes cell growth, invasion, migration and resistance to endocrine therapy13–17. EGFR and HER2 are two well-studied epidermal growth factor receptors and have been shown to be prognostic relevance in a variety of human malignancies including PTC27–32. To date, studies have shown that ERα36 is overexpressed in breast cancer stem cells18–21, ER-positive and -negative human breast carcinomas22, endometrial carcinomas23 and gastric carcinomas24, which is associated with malignancy, invasion, metastasis, drug resistance and poor prognosis of these tumors. However, no study dealt with the expression of ERα36 together with ERα, ERβ, PR, EGFR and HER2 and systematically assessed the correlation of their expression with clinicopathological features in PTC. In our present study, we simultaneously examined ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 mRNA and protein expression in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues using real time RT-PCR and immunohistochemical staining and demonstrated that ERα, ERβ and PR mRNA and protein were expressed in PTCs, nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues. Obviously, the mRNA and protein expression of ERα and PR were gradually increased and those of ERβ were gradually decreased from normal thyroid tissues to nodular hyperplasias and to PTCs. This result is in line with the previous studies showing that increased ERα and PR expression and decreased ERβ expression are associated with the occurrence of nodular hyperplasia and PTC33–35. As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, the mRNA expression levels of the three molecules were significantly higher in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias as well as normal thyroid tissues. There were no statistically significant differences in mRNA expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 between nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues. Consistent with the mRNA expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2, no cases of normal thyroid tissue and nodular hyperplasia showed high protein expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2. However, in PTCs, high protein expression was present in 51.4%, 60.6% and 61.9% for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, respectively. The differences in ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression between PTCs and normal thyroid tissues as well nodular hyperplasias were statistically significant (P  < 0.001). These results suggested that the increased mRNA and protein expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 are only associated with the occurrence of PTC, but not with that of nodular hyperplasia.

Then we assessed the correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with clinicopathological features. We found that ERα and PR protein expression were positively correlated and ERβ protein expression was negatively correlated with tumor size, whereas the protein expression of them was not correlated with the other clinicopathological features analyzed. These results are in line with our and other researcher’s previous studies showing that ERα and PR exert proliferative action and ERβ has an anti-proliferative function in breast cancer cells and PTC cells36–40. Notably, ERα36 protein expression was significantly correlated with ETE, LNM and TNM stage, whereas there was no correlation between the protein expression of ERα36 and the histologic subtype, age, gender and tumor size of PTC patients. PTCs with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage (III–IV) had higher rates of high ERα36 protein expression than those with low TNM stage (I-II) and without ETE and LNM. These results are in line with the previous studies in other tumor types such as breast, endometrial and gastric tumors22–24, indicating that ERα36 may also play important roles in progression and metastasis of PTC. As for EGFR and HER2, no correlation was found to be present between the protein expression of EGFR and HER2 and the histologic subtype, age, gender and tumor size of PTC patients. However, EGFR and HER2 protein expression were significantly correlated with ETE, LNM and TNM stage. PTCs with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage (III–IV) had higher rates of high EGFR and HER2 protein expression than those with low TNM stage (I–II) and without ETE and LNM. These results are consistent with the previous studies showing that EGFR and HER2 high expression are associated with some aggressive behaviors of PTC31,32.

Subsequently, we assessed the correlation of ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression with one another. No correlation was found between the protein expression of ERα, ERβ or PR and the protein expression of ERα36, EGFR or HER2. However, we found that there was some correlation between ERα, ERβ and PR protein expression, and between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression. As for ERα, ERβ and PR, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα and PR protein expression (rs = 0.607, P < 0.001) and a significant negative correlation between ERα and ERβ protein expression (rs = −0.294, P < 0.001) and between PR and ERβ protein expression (rs = −0.245, P < 0.001). These correlations are in line with the previous studies indicating that PR is a typical estrogen dependent target gene which is positively regulated by ERα and negatively regulated by ERβ41,42. Furthermore, ERα and ERβ expression levels were reversely regulated by several mechanisms such as proteasome pathway43,44 and some microRNAs45,46. As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression in PTCs. ERα36 expression was positively correlated with EGFR expression (rs = 0.285, P < 0.001) and HER2 expression (rs = 0.352, P < 0.001). Moreover, a significant positive correlation (rs = 0.160, P = 0.018) was also present between EGFR and HER2 expression. The existence of these positive correlations could be supported by the following data. A positive feedback loop between ERα36 and EGFR/HER2 was reported to promote malignant growth. EGFR signaling activated transcription of ERα36 through an activator-protein-1-binding site in the promoter of ERα36. In turn, ERα36 interacted with the EGFR/Src/Shc complex to strengthen the EGFR signaling pathway and stabilize EGFR protein17,47. A similar positive feedback loop between ERα36 and HER2 was also reported47,48.

Given that ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression were positively correlated with one another and the expression of these individual molecules was related to ETE, LNM and TNM stage, we subsequently evaluated the association of concomitant expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 with ETE, LNM and TNM stage in PTCs. The results showed that ERα36 high expression combined with both EGFR and HER2 high expression had stronger correlation with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage when compared with ERα36 high expression combined with either EGFR or HER2 high expression (P = 0.016, 0.001 for ETE, P ≤ 0.001 for LNM, P < 0.001 for high TNM stage, respectively) and only ERα36 high expression (P < 0.001 for ETE, LNM and high TNM stage). It was indicated that concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 was strongly associated with ETE, LNM and high TNM stage, and may be used as a predictive indicator for malignant behaviors such as ETE, LNM and high TNM stage in PTCs.

In summary, in the present study, we simultaneously examined ERα, ERβ, PR, ERα36, EGFR and HER2 expression, systematically assessed the association of their expression with clinicopathological features and evaluated the potential usefulness of these molecules in prediction for aggressive behaviors of PTCs. The results demonstrated that the mRNA and protein expression of ERα and PR were gradually increased and those of ERβ were gradually decreased from normal thyroid tissues to nodular hyperplasias and to PTCs. Increased ERα and PR and decreased ERβ mRNA and protein expression were associated with the occurrence of nodular hyperplasia and PTC. Remarkably, the mRNA and protein expression levels of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 were significantly higher in PTCs than in nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues. There were no significant differences in the mRNA and protein expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 between nodular hyperplasias and normal thyroid tissues. Increased mRNA and protein expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 were only associated with the occurrence of PTC, but not with that of nodular hyperplasia. There was no correlation between the protein expression of ERα, ERβ or PR and the protein expression of ERα36, EGFR or HER2. However, there was some correlation between ERα, ERβ and PR protein expression, and between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression in PTCs. As for ERα, ERβ and PR, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα and PR, and a significant negative correlation between ERα and ERβ and between PR and ERβ protein expression. As for ERα36, EGFR and HER2, there was a significant positive correlation between ERα36, EGFR and HER2 protein expression in PTCs. Concomitant high expression of ERα36, EGFR and HER2 was strongly associated with aggressive behaviors including ETE, LNM and high TNM stage, and may be used as a predictive indicator for ETE, LNM and high TNM stage in PTCs.

Materials and Methods

Case selection and tissue sample preparation

Tumor specimens for immunohistochemical analysis were obtained from 218 PTC patients who underwent initial thyroidectomy in the Department of Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, between Jan 2010 and Jan 2015. At the initial thyroid surgery for the 218 PTC patients, cervical lymph node dissection (CLND) was performed, tumor size was assessed, histologic subtype, extrathyroidal extension (ETE) and distant metastasis were confirmed. There were 135 patients confirmed to be classic PTC, 36 patients confirmed to be follicular variant of PTC, 26 patients confirmed to be tall cell variant of PTC and 21 patients confirmed to be oncocytic variant of PTC. There were 48 patients confirmed to have ETE, 105 patients confirmed to have lymph node metastasis (LNM), 61 patients confirmed to have distant metastasis, 85 PTCs with tumor size of ≤2 cm, 81 with tumor size of >2 and ≤4 cm, 52 with tumor size of >4 cm. There were 54 men and 164 women, 60 patients with the age of <45 years and 158 with the age of ≥45 years. According to TNM classification, there were 73 patients with stage I, 38 with stage II, 18 with stage III, and 89 with stage IV. For statistical analysis, stage I and II were combined into low TNM stage (I–II), and stage III and IV were combined into high TNM stage (III–IV). Besides, benign thyroid disease specimens were obtained from 156 patients with nodular hyperplasia. 175 normal thyroid tissues were taken from the contralateral lobe of PTC specimens, which exhibited apparently normal morphology as a control. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Tumor specimens for real-time RT-PCR were obtained from 10 PTC patients between Jan 2017 and June 2017. The benign thyroid disease specimens were obtained from 10 patients with nodular hyperplasia. For controls, 10 normal thyroid tissue specimens were used. All specimens were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C up to subsequent RNA extraction, reverse transcription and real-time PCR.

Tissue microarray (TMA)

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks were routinely prepared from surgical specimens of PTC, nodular hyperplasia and normal thyroid tissue. Representative areas containing tumor, nodular hyperplasia or normal thyroid tissue were identified by a pathologist. Duplicate tissue cores with a diameter of 0.6 mm were taken from each specimen (Beecher Instruments, Silver Springs, USA) and arrayed on a recipient paraffin block using standard procedures. Serial 5-μm-thick sections were cut with a Leica microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and mounted onto polylysine-coated slides.

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical staining of TMA section was performed as previously described49. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies for ERα (BS1114), ERβ (BS8465), PR (BS1766) and EGFR (BS1533) were purchased from Bioworld Technology (Minnesota, USA). Rabbit polyclonal antibody for ERα36 (CY1109) was purchased from Cell Applications (San Diego, CA, USA). Rabbit polyclonal antibody for HER2 (ab131490) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). These rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used as primary antibodies at 1:100 dilution and biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (ZB-2010, Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, China) was used as a secondary antibody at 1:500 dilution.

Immunohistochemical scoring

Stained TMA sections were scanned using the Nanozoomer HT Scan System (Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan). A semiquantitative assessment of immunohistochemical (IHC) scoring was performed by two observers blinded to the clinicopathologic data using the NDP Viewer software (version 1.1.27), with a consensus reached in all cases. The IHC score was assigned based on staining intensity and percentage of positive cells. The intensity score was assigned as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining) and 3 (strong staining). The proportion score was assigned as 0 (<5% positive cells), 1 (6–25% positive cells), 2 (26–50% positive cells), 3 (51–75% positive cells) and 4 (>75% positive cells). Multiplication of the intensity and proportion scores gave rise to the final staining score: 0 (negative), + (1–4), ++ (5–8) and +++ (9–12). For statistical analysis, a final staining score of negative or + was defined as the low expression, and a final staining score of +  + or +++ was defined as the high expression.

RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription and Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from frozen PTC, nodular hyperplasia and normal thyroid tissue specimens using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA), and residual genomic DNA was eliminated by DNase I digestion (Ambion, USA). RNA purity was confirmed by spectrophotometry. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA by using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The final cDNA product was amounted to 25 μL and stored at −80 °C.

Real-time PCR was performed by using SYBR-Green real-time PCR method on ABI-Prism 7000 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems, USA). The primers used were as following: for ERα, 5′-ATGATGAAAGGTGGGATACGA3′ (forward) and 5′-CTAGTTTGCGAGATTCTTCTTGTC-3′ (reverse); for ERβ, 5′-GTCACAGCGACCCAGGAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTTACTTCTACCTCTGAGAAAAC-3′ (reverse); for PR, 5′-TCATTCTATTCATTATGCCTTACCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAAAACCTTCCCGATGCTTCAG-3′ (reverse); for ERα36, 5′-CCAAGAATGTTCAACCACAACCT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCACGGTTCATTA ACATCTTTCTG-3′ (reverse); for EGFR, 5′-CGTCCGCAAGTGTAAGAA-3′(forward) and 5′-AGCAAA AACCCTGTGATT-3′ (reverse); for HER2, 5′-AGGGAGTATGTGAATGCC-3′(forward) and 5′-GGCCACTG GAATTTTCAC-3′(reverse); for GAPDH, 5′-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAAGATGGT GATGGGATTTC-3′ (reverse). Quantities of gene specific mRNA expression were determined by the CT method. Samples were analyzed in triplicate. Average threshold cycle (CT) value for GAPDH was used as an internal calibrator. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used for relative quantitation. Data was presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The real-time PCR mix was made on the basis of the prescription from the supplier: 6 μL sterile water, 1 μL sense and 1 μL antisense primers, 10 μL Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG w/ROX (Invitrogen, USA), and 2 μL target cDNA in a total volume of 20 μL. Run conditions were 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. Data were presented as percentages and mean and standard deviation, according to the distribution. Significance was assessed using Chi-square, Spearman rank and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate, to compare the groups. P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Data Availability

The data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81272937) and by Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Personnel Ministry (2011).

Author Contributions

Z.-M.L., Y.-J.D. and Y.-B.Q. conceived the experiments; Y.-J.D., R.J. and L.Z. conducted the experiments; Z.-M.L., Y.-J.D., Y.-B.Q. and M.X. analyzed the results; L.Z., Y.-B.Q. and M.X. collected specimens and patient information; Z.-M.L. wrote the manuscript; G.G.C. revised the manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Yu-Jie Dai and Yi-Bo Qiu contributed equally to this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Li H, Li J. Thyroid disorders in women. Minerva Med. 2015;106:109–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hima S, Sreeja S. Modulatory role of 17β-estradiol in the tumor microenvironment of thyroid cancer. IUBMB Life. 2016;68:85–96. doi: 10.1002/iub.1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Przybylik-Mazurek E, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Fedorowicz A, Pach D. Factors connected with the female sex seem to play an important role in differentiated thyroid cancer. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2012;28:150–5. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.563909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caini S, et al. Menstrual and reproductive history and use of exogenous sex hormones and risk of thyroid cancer among women: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26:511–8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0546-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pike MC, Pearce CL, Wu AH. Prevention of cancers of the breast, endometrium and ovary. Oncogene. 2004;23:6379–91. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hall JM, Couse JF, Korach KS. The multifaceted mechanisms of estradiol and estrogen receptor signaling. J. Biol Chem. 2001;276:36869–72. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100029200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matthews J, Gustafsson JA. Estrogen signaling: a subtle balance between ER alpha and ER beta. Mol Interv. 2003;3:281–92. doi: 10.1124/mi.3.5.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schultz JR, Petz LN, Nardulli AM. Estrogen receptor alpha and Sp1 regulate progesterone receptor gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;201:165–75. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00415-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petz LN, Ziegler YS, Loven MA, Nardulli AM. Estrogen receptor alpha and activating protein-1 mediate estrogen responsiveness of the progesterone receptor gene in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Endocrinology. 2002;143:4583–91. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bagaria SP, et al. Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:125–9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Z, et al. Identification, cloning, and expression of human estrogen receptor-alpha36, a novel variant of human estrogen receptor-alpha66. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;336:1023–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang ZY, Yin L. Estrogen receptor alpha-36 (ER-α36): A new player in human breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;418:193–206. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cao J, et al. Estrogen receptor-α36 is involved in development of acquired tamoxifen resistance via regulating the growth status switch in breast cancer cells. Mol Oncol. 2013;7:611–24. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Z, et al. A variant of estrogen receptor-{alpha}, hER-{alpha}36: transduction of estrogen- and antiestrogen-dependent membrane-initiated mitogenic signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;103:9063–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603339103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lin SL, et al. ER-alpha36, a variant of ER-alpha, promotes tamoxifen agonist action in endometrial cancer cells via the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways. PLoS One. 2010;5:9013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tong JS, et al. ER-α36, a novel variant of ER-α, mediates estrogen-stimulated proliferation of endometrial carcinoma cells via the PKCδ/ERK pathway. PLoS One. 2010;5:15408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang XT, et al. A positive feedback loop of ER-α36/EGFR promotes malignant growth of ER-negative breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2011;30:770–80. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Deng H, et al. ER-α36-mediated rapid estrogen signaling positively regulates ER-positive breast cancer stem/progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:88034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deng H, et al. ER-α variant ER-α36 mediates antiestrogen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer stem/progenitor cells. J. Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144:417–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lauricella M, et al. The analysis of estrogen receptor-α positive breast cancer stem-like cells unveils a high expression of the serpin proteinase inhibitor PI-9: Possible regulatory mechanisms. Int J. Oncol. 2016;49:352–60. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Giraddi RR, et al. Stem and progenitor cell division kinetics during postnatal mouse mammary gland development. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8487. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee LM, et al. ER-alpha36, a novel variant of ER-alpha, is expressed in ER-positive and -negative human breast carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:479–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tu BB, et al. ER-α36, a novel variant of estrogen receptor α, is involved in EGFR-related carcinogenesis in endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:227–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Deng H, et al. A variant of estrogen receptor-alpha, ER-alpha36 is expressed in human gastric cancer and is highly correlated with lymph node metastasis. Oncol Rep. 2010;24:171–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yarden Y. The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer: signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Eur J. Cancer. 2001;37:3–8. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00230-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–37. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Koletsa T, et al. EGFR expression and activation are common in HER2 positive and triple-negative breast tumours. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25:1171–9. doi: 10.14670/HH-25.1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lapińska-Szumczyk S1, et al. HER2-positive endometrial cancer subtype carries poor prognosis. Clin Transl Sci. 2014;7:482–8. doi: 10.1111/cts.12207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rego RL, et al. Prognostic effect of activated EGFR expression in human colon carcinomas: comparison with EGFR status. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:165–72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fuse N, et al. Prognostic impact of HER2, EGFR, and c-MET status on overall survival of advanced gastric cancer patients. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:183–91. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0471-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fisher KE, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression is a marker for adverse pathologic features in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J. Surg Res. 2013;185:217–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu G, Wang J, Zhou Z, Li T, Tang F. Combined staining for immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: improvement in the sensitivity or specificity? J. Int Med Res. 2003;3:281–92. doi: 10.1177/0300060513490617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sturniolo G, et al. Immunohistochemical Expression of Estrogen Receptor-α and Progesterone Receptor in Patients with PapillaryThyroid Cancer. Eur Thyroid J. 2016;5:224–230. doi: 10.1159/000452488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu J, Chen G, Meng XY, Liu ZH, Dong S. Serum levels of sex hormones and expression of their receptors in thyroid tissue in female patients with various types of thyroid neoplasms. Pathol Res Pract. 2014;210:830–5. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang Y, et al. Differential expression patterns and clinical significance of estrogen receptor-α and β in papillary thyroid carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:383. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ström A, et al. Estrogen receptor beta inhibits 17beta-estradiol-stimulated proliferation of the breast cancer cell line T47D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:1566–1571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308319100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Williams C, Edvardsson K, Lewandowski SA, Ström A, Gustafsson JA. A genome-wide study of the repressive effects of estrogen receptor beta on estrogen receptor alpha signaling in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2008;27:1019–1032. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hegde SM, et al. Interplay of nuclear receptors (ER, PR, and GR) and their steroid hormones in MCF-7 cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2016;422:109–120. doi: 10.1007/s11010-016-2810-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clare SE, et al. Progesterone receptor blockade in human breast cancer cells decreases cell cycle progression through G2/M by repressing G2/M genes. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:326. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2355-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mo XM, et al. Up-regulation of Hsp27 by ERα/Sp1 facilitates proliferation and confers resistance to apoptosis in human papillary thyroid cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;431:71–87. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sá SI, Pereira PA, Malikov V, Madeira MD. Role of estrogen receptor α and β in the induction of progesterone receptors in hypothalamic ventromedial neurons. Neuroscience. 2013;238:159–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bulun SE, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta, estrogen receptor-alpha, and progesterone resistance in endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:36–43. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cheng L, et al. PES1 promotes breast cancer by differentially regulating ERα and ERβ. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2857–70. doi: 10.1172/JCI62676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao Z, et al. Reciprocal Regulation of ERα and ERβ Stability and Activity by Diptoindonesin G. Chem Biol. 2015;22:1608–21. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kondo N, Toyama T, Sugiura H, Fujii Y, Yamashita H. miR-206 Expression is down-regulated in estrogen receptor alpha-positive human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5004–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Al-Nakhle H, et al. Estrogen receptor {beta}1 expression is regulated by miR-92 in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4778–84. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yin L, Zhang XT, Bian XW, Guo YM, Wang ZY. Disruption of the ER-α36-EGFR/HER2 positive regulatory loops restores tamoxifen sensitivity in tamoxifen resistance breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:107369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kang L, Guo Y, Zhang X, Meng J, Wang ZY. A positive cross-regulation of HER2 and ER-α36 controls ALDH1 positive breast cancer cells. J. Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;127:262–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang N, et al. Overexpression of HIF-2α, TWIST, and CXCR4 is associated with lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:589423. doi: 10.1155/2013/589423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES